16O + 16O molecular structures of superdeformed ...

1 downloads 0 Views 207KB Size Report
Jul 5, 2017 - Zheng Shi-Jie, Xu Fu-Rong, Yuan Cen-Xi et al. Systematic Study on Triaxial Superdeformed Bands of Hf Isotopes. Zhang Da-Li and Ding Bin- ...
Home

Search

Collections

Journals

About

Contact us

My IOPscience

16O + 16O molecular structures of superdeformed states in S isotopes

This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2017 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 863 012050 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/863/1/012050) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 154.16.46.177 This content was downloaded on 05/07/2017 at 06:05 Please note that terms and conditions apply.

You may also be interested in: Manifestation of cluster effects in collective octupole and superdeformed states of heavy nuclei. T.M. Shneidman, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko et al. Gamma decay of superdeformed states A Lopez-Martens, T Døssing, T L Khoo et al. Coexistence of cluster states and mean-field-type states Hisashi Horiuchi Mixed representation RPA calculation for negative-parity excitations built on superdeformed states in the 40Ca and neutron-rich sulfur regions T Inakura Two-Particle Separation Energies in the Superdeformed Well A N Wilson, A Korichi, S Siem et al. Search for the GDR built on superdeformed nuclei A Bracco, F Camera, S Leoni et al. Alignments in the nobelium isotopes Zheng Shi-Jie, Xu Fu-Rong, Yuan Cen-Xi et al. Systematic Study on Triaxial Superdeformed Bands of Hf Isotopes Zhang Da-Li and Ding Bin-Gang

11th International Conference on Clustering Aspects of Nuclear Structure and Dynamics IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 863 (2017) 012050 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/863/1/012050

16

O + 16O molecular structures of superdeformed states in S isotopes Y Taniguchi1 1

Faculty of Health Sciences, Nihon Institute of Medical Science, 1276 Shimogawara, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Structures of excited states in S isotopes are investigated by using the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics and generator coordinate method (GCM). The GCM basis wave functions are calculated via energy variation with a constraint on the quadrupole deformation parameter β. By applying the GCM after parity and angular momentum projections, the coexistence of positive- and negative-parity superdeformed (SD) bands are predicted in 33-36 S except for negative-parity states in 36 S. The SD bands have structures of 16 O + 16 O + valence neutron(s) in molecular orbitals around the two 16 O cores in a cluster picture. The configurations of the valence neutron(s) in the SD states are δ and/or π molecular orbitals.

1. Introduction Clustering and deformation play important roles in nuclear structures. In S isotopes, 16 O + 16 O structures are expected to develop because S isotopes are analogous of Be isotopes. Be isotopes are considered to have structures of α + α + valence neutrons in molecular orbitals[1–8]. An α and an 16 O are double-closed-shell nuclei, and when α is replaced with 16 O in Be isotopes, they become S isotopes. In fact, existence of superdeformed (SD) states that contain a large amount of 16 O + 16 O cluster structure components has been predicted[9, 10], which is an analogue of α + α structure of 8 Be. The dominant components of the SD states in 32 S are predicted to be 4¯ hω configurations in the spherical shell-model picture. By a γ-spectroscopy experiment, various positive- and negative-parity states have been observed[11]. Low-lying states are considered to be 0¯hω or 2¯ hω neutron excited states. And many additional states are observed. But theoretical study about many-particle-many-hole states is insufficient. In this paper, structures of positive- and negative-parity SD states in 34 S is discussed in details. The SD states have structures of 16 O + 16 O clusters and valence neutrons in molecular orbitals. Molecular structures developed in 33-36 S are also discussed. Details of this work is reported in Ref. [12]. 2. The GCM and AMD models In this work, wave functions of ground and excited states are calculated by using the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD) and the generator coordinate method (GCM), which is superposition of AMD wave functions to diagonalize Hamiltonian. The Gogny D1S force

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1

-264 -266 -268 -270 -272 -274 -276 -278 -280 -282 -284 -286

-268

34

S

34

S

-270 energy [MeV]

energy [MeV]

11th International Conference on Clustering Aspects of Nuclear Structure and Dynamics IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 863 (2017) 012050 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/863/1/012050

-272 -274 -276 -278 -280 -282

0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

0

quadrupole deformation parameter β

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 quadrupole deformation parameter β

Figure 1. Energy curves of 34 S as functions of quadrupole deformation parameter β. Left and right panels are for positive- and negative-parity, respectively.

single-particle energy [MeV]

-10

positive negative

[202]

[321]

-20 -30 -40 -50 -60

single-particle energy [MeV]

0 0

-10 -20

quadrupole deformation parameter β

[321] [202]

-30 -40 -50 -60 -70 0.0

-70 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

positive negative

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 quadrupole deformation parameter β

0.8

Figure 2. Single-particle energies of as functions of quadrupole deformation parameter β for positive- (left) and negative-parity (right) states. Circles and squares show positive- and negative-parity orbits, respectively. Numbers in brackets show the Nilsson quanta for the two highest orbits of neutrons in SD region. This figure is taken from Ref. [12].

is used as an effective Hamiltonian. An AMD wave function is a Slater determinant of Gaussian wave packets, and parameters in the wave functions such as position of each wave packet and spin directions are optimized by variational calculation with a constraint on quadrupole deformation parameter β. Obtained wave functions are projected onto eigen states of parity and angular momentum and superposed. Final wave functions are obtained by diagonalizing Hamiltonian. 3. Results Figure 1 shows β-energy surface obtained by energy variational calculations for positive- and negative-parity states, respectively, in 34 S. β-energy surfaces have local minima and a shoulder at SD region around β ∼ 0.6, which implies coexistence of positive- and negative-parity SD states. Figure 2 shows single-particle orbits of neutrons as functions of quadrupole deformation parameter β for positive- and negative-parity states, respectively. Circles and squares show positive- and negative-parity orbits, respectively. In SD region, the two highest orbits are flat

2

11th International Conference on Clustering Aspects of Nuclear Structure and Dynamics IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 863 (2017) 012050 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/863/1/012050

25

12+ exp.

theory

9− +

excitation energy [MeV]

10

(10+ ) + (10 ) (9− )(9+ ) 10+ 9+ 8+ + 8 + − 8 8 7+ − 6− 6 6+ 6−

10 6− 7−

5

4− − 5(−) 2 4+

1− 3− −

3

+

4 2+ +

0

2+ 0 −

0+ yrast +

3+ 2+ 2+

8

+

8+

6

+

5 7−

2− − 5+ 4 3+

12+

8− 4− 2− 2− 4− 7− 4− 1− 3−

6+

3+ 2+

6



5− 4− 3− 2− 4−

12− 11− 10+

12





7−

9− 8−

6−− 3 5− 3− 6−

12+

10−

20

15

25

11−

10+

11−

20

10− 9− 8 7− 6− 5− 4−

8+



10− 8+ 9− 8 7− 6− 5− 3− −

6+

6+ 4+ 2+ 0+

15

4+ 2+ 0+ 10

4+ 2+ 0+ 5

2+ 2+ 0+ 0¯ hω 1¯ hω 0+ 0+ 4− 0+ 3− 2− 2+ SD2 SD SD1 ND ND ND ND

0

Figure 3. Left and right parts show experimental and theoretical level scheme, respectively, in 34 S. This figure is taken from Ref. [12].

and those Nilsson quanta are [202] and [321], which are positive- and negative-parity orbits, respectively. For lower 16 orbits, they have 2¯ hω excited configurations. Proton orbits have same configurations as lower 16 orbits of neutrons. Totally, the 32 S core part of SD region in 34 S has 4¯hω excited configurations, which are same as configurations of predicted SD states in 32 S [32 S(SD)][10]. The 32 S(SD) core part has neck structure as well as a prediction of SD states. They show that structure of these wave functions are 32 S(SD) core + [202] and [321] neutrons. Superposing those wave functions after parity and angular momentum projection, level scheme is obtained as shown in Fig. 3. Various rotational band are obtained. Three bands labeled − + K π = 0+ SD1 , 4SD , and 0SD2 , coexist, which are SD bands. Those three SD bands have multiparticle-multi-hole excited configurations for both of proton and neutron parts. Configurations − + 32 2 of dominant components of K π = 0+ SD1 , 4SD , and 0SD2 bands are S(SD) core + [202] , [202][321] and [321]2 valence neutrons, respectively, in the Nilsson picture. The SD states are interpreted as 16 O + 16 O molecular structure in a cluster picture. Configuration of 32 S(SD) core is same as those of SD states in 32 S, which contain a large amount of 16 O + 16 O cluster structure components[10]. Valence neutrons have [202] and [321] configurations in a Nilsson picture, and the [202] and [321] orbits correspond to δ and π orbitals around two 16 O cores, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4. The left part of Fig. 4 shows schematic pictures of phase of 0d orbits around two 16 O cores (dotted circles) for |lz | = 2, 1, and 0 components. By linear combination of 0d around two 16 O cores, δ, π, and σ orbitals (right part) are generated from |lz | = 2, 1, and 0 orbits, respectively, around two 16 O cores. Figure 4(a) shows a |lz | = 2 orbital, which is a δ orbital. Superposing two |lz | = 2 orbits around 16 O cores, a molecular orbital becomes right part. It has no node for z-direction. The 0d orbits has no node for radial direction, so Nilsson quanta of a δ orbital is [202]. Figure 4(b) shows a |lz | = 1 3

11th International Conference on Clustering Aspects of Nuclear Structure and Dynamics IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 863 (2017) 012050 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/863/1/012050

Figure 4. Schematic illustrations of molecular orbitals generated from 0d orbits around two 16 O cores for (a) δ, (b) π, and (c) σ orbitals. Horizontal axis is z-axis. Inverse triangles show locations of nodes in molecular orbitals in the z direction. Numbers in brackets show Nilsson quanta. This figure is taken from Ref. [12].

orbital, which is a π orbital. As same discussions, The π orbital have two nodes for z-directions, and Nilsson quanta of a π orbital is [321]. Figure 4(c) shows a |lz | = 0 orbital, which is a σ − + orbital. Nilsson quanta of a σ orbital is [400]. Totally, structures of K π = 0+ SD1 , 4SD , and 0SD2 are interpreted as 16 O + 16 O + δ 2 , δπ, and π 2 structures, respectively, in a cluster picture. It is predicted that 33-36 S also have positive- and negative-parity SD states with 16 O + 16 O molecular structure except for negative-parity states in 36 S. 4. Conclusions In conclusions, structures of SD states in 34 S by using the AMD and the GCM. In 34 S, two positive-parity and one negative-parity SD bands coexist. Those structures are interpreted as 16 O + 16 O + δ 2 , π 2 and δπ molecular orbitals around two 16 O cores. 33-36 S also have SD states except for negative-parity states in 36 S. They have also molecular structures. In order to understand largely deformed states in N 6= Z nuclei, clustering and molecular orbital around the cluster core are important. References [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Seya M, Kohno M and Nagata S 1981 Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 204 Kanada-En’yo Y, Horiuchi H and Dot´e A 1999 Phys. Rev. C 60 064304 Itagaki N and Okabe S 2000 Phys. Rev. C 61 044306 Ito M, Kato K and Ikeda K 2004 Phys. Lett. B 588 43 Ito M 2006 Phys. Lett. B 636 293 Ito M, Itagaki N, Sakurai H and Ikeda K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 182502 Ito M, Itagaki N and Ikeda K 2012 Phys. Rev. C 85 014302 Kanada-En’yo Y, Kimura M and Ono A 2012 Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012 01A202 Ohkubo S and Yamashita K 2002 Phys. Rev. C 66 021301 Kimura M and Horiuchi H 2004 Phys. Rev. C 69 051304 Bisoi A, Sarkar M S, Sarkar S, Ray S, Basu M R, Kanjilal D, Nag S, Selvakumar K, Goswami A, Madhavan N, Muralithar S and Bhowmik R K 2013 Phys. Rev. C 88 034303 [12] Taniguchi Y 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 054308

4