7J-b - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

2 downloads 0 Views 908KB Size Report
George Y. Baaklini and Alex Vary ......... Lewis Research. Center .... by Sanders and Baaklini [3], we selected three input varaiables, namely, the milling time of ...
5/ NASATechnical

Radial -"

_°_-_

Memorandum

10,6.048 ........

Basis Function

Network

) _,e,f/m_/

......

7J-b

Learns

Ceramic Processing and Predicts Related Strength and Density

,_Krzysztof J. Cios ; ;Ur_v_r'-_-(y of Tbledo ........................ Toledo, Ohio George Y. Baaklini and Alex Vary Lewis Research Center Cleveland,

Ohio

.........

-

::_

and .......

Robert E. Tjia University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio :

-=

_

=

May 1993

(NASA-TM-I06048) RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORK LEARNS CERAMIC PROCESSING AND PREDICTS RELATED • STRENGTH AND DENSITY (NASA) 20

N93-27129

Unclas

p

G3124

0169424

_=

RADIAL

BASIS

FUNCTION

NETWORK

PREDICTS

RELATED

LEARNS

CERAMIC

STRENGTH

AND

PROCESSING

AND

DENSITY

Krzysztof J. Cios _* University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio 43606 George Y. Baaklini and Alex Vary National Aeronautics arid Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland,

Ohio 44135 and

Robert E. Tjia University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio 43606

ABSTRACT

Radial

basis

Si3N4

modulus

MOR

bars

pressure

which

density

were

points"

method

(RBF)

of rupture

were

were

the the

descent

less than

12%

demonstrated

tested

outputs used

ceramic

°C.

the

to set the

hidden

RBF

network

an average and

were

centers

and

predicted

error

sintering

input

networks

of less than the

the

data

temperature time,

features.

output

and

from

273

and

135

Sintering

gas

Flexural

strength

and

The

"nodes-at-data-

assessed.

strength

accelerating

using

at room

time,

as the

layer

trained

tested

Milling

RBF

for optimizing

were

were

used

by which

with

a potential

which

at 1370

The

density

bars

networks

parameters

method. and

neural

(MOR)

processing

was

gradient

emerging

function

layer with

training

an

used

average

2%. Further,

the RBF

development

and

the

error

of

network

processing

of

materials.

INTRODUCTION

Ceramics material weight, currently fracture processing :t

for

such

heat

resistance

as

engine

with which

[1, 2, 3].

On sabbatical at Lewis Research

In

nitride

applications

to oxidization,

encountered toughness,

silicon

occur their

due and

this

(Si3N4)

type due

work,

are

to their

thermal

to discrete Sanders

leave from the University Center.

high

shock

of ceramic

under

investigation

operating

resistance

is its widely defects

and

of Toledo

introduced

Baaklini

[3],

and NASA

as

a candidate

temperatures,

reduced

[1]. The varying into were

Resident

major

drawback

strength the

and

material

concerned

Research

low

during with

Associate

the

problem that

of designing

possesses

high

manufacturing

they

sintering

investigated

the effect

was superior

manufacturing

nitride

strength

with

tried

temperature,

sieving

a silicon

fully dense

the

In

to optimize time,

lowest

several

nitrogen

of sintering

amount

pressure

Hence,

by using sound

of

varaiables and

and temperature

to dry sieving.

process

ceramic with the goal of achieving scatter.

such

as milling

setter

contact.

variations

process

time,

In

judgement

trying

coupled

they

wet powder

to optimize

with

of

sintering

addition,

and whether

in their work, they were

engineering

the

material

the

trial and error

methodology.

In our work networks

to help

approximation output

we are interested in the process

making

parameter,

modelling

design

say strength,

for new materials. but it becomes

data collected

by Sanders

during

variables mentioned

Designers

inputs)

data

However,

we expected

despite

was

not

powder,

strength

there

variables

available

density.

not enough

such as temperature

originally that

of rupture

and

were

obtained

an RBF

nitrogen

pressure

we attempt

on resultant

make use of the data obtained network.

The original

different

combinations

sieving,

would

determine and density

how effectively

of milling

times,

bars tested a neural

of a batch of MOR

toward

a desired

MOR

rationale

training

pairs

2

namely,

the

pressure the output the

above

asociated

with

be noted that the network

accurate

analysis. predictions

in the input space.

of milling

time,

sintering

the aid of a neural

test bar strength times,

can be trained

bars.

It should

for neural

pressure,

on 273 MOR

bars

the purpose to predict

time

and

network.

We

and testing

and density

nitrogen

at 1370 °C. Therefore,

network

the

From

(outputs

of a

From

for using

study [3] for training

sintering

effects

varaiables,

give reasonably

with

up process

of variables.

test bars.

neural

in function

and the nitrogen

The

distributed

and density

from the previous

time,

intended

to find the effects

data had exhibited

and 135MOR

excel

most

input

(MOR)

etc. Thus, the data set used in this study is based

temperature

to utilize

the combined

and sieving.

nor

network

strength

three

the sintering

the fact that the data points are unevenly

In this paper

comprehend

[3], we selected

of the modulus

is that

for processing

networks

that contribute

can usually

and Baaklini

flexural

variables

Neural

very difficult to do so for a large number

sintering

we selected

variables

it is possible

from a few trials. This Should help in speeding

time of the Si3N4-Si02-Y203

employed

of ceramics.

it easy to identify

few variables

milling

in finding whether

the neural

variations

for

powder

wet

tested

at room

of this study is to

the resultant

strength

i f

/

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION

One complex,

of the common

non-linear

functions.

any given function (nodes).

it employs

layer

proposed

the weights

network

(RBF)

approach

uses a combination

network,

data points

close to its center.

network

canbe

made

number

has been

is computationally

shown

elements

to be successful gradient

of

to approximate

of processing

demanding

iterative

error

reduction

linear outputs, slower iterative

of network

descent

in this method

and slow and results

because

the hidden

less

layer nodes

scheme,

direct approches methods.

as the radial

training

time

learning.

are RBF nodes

of it) and each node only responds

some

form

in

similar

to that

involving

used

matrix

learning

basis

because

the

The network centered

functions method,

in backpropagation.

inversion

has

is

at the

to an input which is

or sigmoidal

of supervised

layer

known

and supervised

layer nodes are usually linear

using

units in the hidden

[4]. Also

requires

of self-organization

The output

may be obtained

processing

to backpropagation

(or some subset

weights

and their such

as an

In the case of

can be used

in place

of the

of the RBF Network

Figure network

network

is the approximation

is the fact that the iterative

this type

as self-organized

Description

networks

has a sufficient

with "locally-tuned"

as an alternative

function

training

a neural

that the network

disadvantage

neural

times.

A three

considered

Theoretically,

backpropagation

its major

to optimize

long training

been

provided

The traditional

area. However,

uses of feedforward

NETWORKS

1 shows

performs

a general

a mapping

RBF

network

f: R n -- R

with n inputs

and one linear

given by the following

equation

output.

This

I I.II denotes

the

[5] :

11 r

f(x) -- a0 + 2E ,li_o(J

Ix-oil I)

(1)

i=l

where Euclidean

x _

R n is the norm,

Jli (0

nr) are the RBF centers,

input

vector,

_,(.) is a function

< = i < = nr) are

the weights

and nr is the number

from of the

of centers.

3

R n -- R, output

node,

As a variation

ci (0

< = i < =

of the linear

output,

I Bias

I

l_