A universal glue: underwater adhesion of the

Downloaded from http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on December 19, 2014

rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org

A universal glue: underwater adhesion of the secretion of the carnivorous flypaper plant Roridula gorgonias Dagmar Voigt1,2,†, Wilfried Konrad3 and Stanislav Gorb1,2 1

Research Cite this article: Voigt D, Konrad W, Gorb S. 2015 A universal glue: underwater adhesion of the secretion of the carnivorous flypaper plant Roridula gorgonias. Interface Focus 5: 20140053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2014.0053 One contribution of 15 to a theme issue ‘Biological adhesives: from biology to biomimetics’. Subject Areas: biomechanics, biomimetics, biomaterials Keywords: glue, adhesive, biomechanics, glandular trichomes, plant surface, resin Author for correspondence: Dagmar Voigt e-mail: [email protected]

†

Present address: Institute for Botany, Technische Universita¨t Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.

Evolutionary Biomaterials Group, Department of Thin Films and Biological Systems, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (formerly Metals Research), Heisenbergstraße 03, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 2 Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts-Universita¨t zu Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24098 Kiel, Germany 3 Department of Geosciences, University of Tu¨bingen, Ho¨lderlinstrasse 12, 72074 Tu¨bingen, Germany Glandular trichomes of the carnivorous plant Roridula gorgonias release a viscous resinous secretion. Its adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic glass surfaces was measured in air and underwater. The underwater adhesion reached up to 91% (on hydrophilic glass) and 28% (on hydrophobic glass) of that measured in the air. After being submersed for 24 h in water, trichomes did not lose their ability to adhere to both types of glass surfaces underwater. We assume that acylglycerides and triterpenoids, which have been demonstrated previously to be main compounds of the secretion, cause the predominantly non-polar character and the insolubility in water. The robustness of the secretion to a wet environment presumably enables the plant to maintain its trapping function also under humid conditions and during rainy weather.

1. Introduction The viscid secretion released from glandular trichomes of the carnivorous flypaper plant Roridula gorgonias Planch. (Roridulaceae) [1–3] has been suggested to be the strongest and extremely effective glue among those evolved in insect-trapping plants because of the conspicuous number of observed trapped insects of considerable body size and mass [1,4–6]. Three different trichome types of different geometry and stiffness act together in the three-dimensional, hierarchical trap: (i) long tentacle-shaped, (ii) medium-sized, and (iii) short [3]. Prominent, long trichomes with less viscous secretion are responsible for establishment of initial contacts and entanglement of the prey, whereas the short trichomes, bearing more viscid secretion, completely immobilize it. For example, a 60 mg heavy fly, glued to a single short trichome, could only be removed with a pull-off force 4.8 times higher than the fly body weight [2]. The secretion is of resinous nature and mainly composed of triterpenoids (taraxeradiol, dihydroxyolean-12-ene, dihydroxyurs-12-ene, 3 unknown triterpenediols), acylglycerides (mono- and diacylglycerides) and traces of germanicol and 3a-lupeol [7]. No saccharides or proteins have been previously detected. The chemical composition of a residual secretion component remains unclear. Because the secretion extends into filaments during pulling on it, its elastomeric properties have been previously assumed [2,8,9]. The secretion drop is water-insoluble, maintaining ovoid or spherical shape after washing with water [8–11]. Because of its resistance to water, one may suggest that it can also adhere to substrates in an aquatic environment. The secretion may be periodically exposed to wet conditions, such as heavy rainfalls in the South African biome fynbos [12], to which R. gorgonias belongs. Watersoluble secretion, such as the case of carnivorous plants Drosera, Drosophyllum and Byblis [13,14], can be simply washed out by rain, which would require an additional secretory activity to reset the adhesive ability of the plant trap. Interestingly, underwater attachment in aquatic organisms is usually based on proteinaceous secretions (reviews by Scherge & Gorb [15] and Flammang [16]).

& 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.


2 (a)

PC


retraction FS

load GC

Interface Focus 5: 20140053

AM GS GT

CL

GJ

(b)

HO

0.4

force (mN)

0.2 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

–0.2 –0.4 –0.6

distance (mm)

Figure 1. Force measurements. (a) An experimental design for measuring underwater adhesion of single trichomes of R. gorgonias. The fresh trichome (GT) was perpendicularly clamped (CL) and mounted on a horizontal holder (HO). A force sensor (FS) with a firmly adhering glass capillary (GC) and attached glass slide (GS) was moved down, using a motorized micromanipulator, until the contact between the GS and the secretion of the GT was established. Then the sensor with the secretion adhering to the GS was pulled off. The force – time signal was recorded and processed further in a computer (PC). A glass aquarium (GJ) was filled with Aqua Millipore water (AM) during underwater measurements. (b) Representative force – distance curve, transformed from obtained force – time curve. It displays a transition at 0.2 mm which indicates that instabilities have developed in order to relieve the force. Insets show the trichome position relative to the glass slide at each part of the force – distance curve. Arrows point to the direction of the substrate movement. The shaded area indicates the work that had to be applied to retract the adhering trichome from the surface.

Taking into account the general interest in underwater adhesion [17], the adhesive performance of the resinous plant secretion in the presence of water has to be examined. In this study, the secretion of R. gorgonias was visualized in dry and aqueous environments using light microscopy techniques. Its adhesive properties in air and underwater on hydrophilic (normal) and hydrophobic (silanized) glass surfaces were measured using a cell load force transducer.

2.2. Microscopy Microscopic observations of trichomes with adhesive secretion were conducted using a stereomicroscope Olympus SZX 12 with a DF PLAPO 1xPF objective (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Images were taken using a Nikon Coolpix E995 digital camera adapted to the stereomicroscope with a C-Mount adapter and an MDC 2 relay lens MXA 29005 (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Force measurements

2. Material and methods 2.1. Plants One- to three-year-old R. gorgonias were obtained from a private glasshouse culture (Klaus Keller, Augsburg, Germany), kept under laboratory conditions during experiments (23.7 + 1.78C, 47.3 + 10.0% RH, 16 h photoperiod) and supplied with wingless adult fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera, Drosophilidae). For experiments, short trichomes of the 10th – 20th leaves below the apex were selected.

Using a razor blade, a piece of leaf tissue bearing a single short glandular trichome with a spherical secretion droplet of 0.25 mm diameter on its tip was cut out of a living leaf of R. gorgonias. The leaf sample, with the trichome oriented horizontally, was mechanically clamped with tweezers attached to a holder (figure 1a). Slides of normal and silanized glass (5 mm diameter, ¨ nigshofen, Superior, Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Lauda-Ko Germany) were used as test substrates. They were glued perpendicularly to one end of a thin-walled glass capillary (1 mm diameter, TW100F-4, World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL) using ¨ nchen, super glue Loctite (Henkel Loctite Deutschland GmbH, Mu


(a)

(b)

3

(c)

mt tt tt


mt (d) st

(e)

st

3. Results 3.1. Secretion in air and underwater Secretion droplets on trichome tips (figure 2) appeared shiny and transparent in air. Their spherical shape remained stable underwater even after 24 h of submersion (figure 2a,c). However, droplets looked ‘milky’ underwater, and sometimes appeared spotted after being submersed (figure 2b,d,e). Complete dissolution was never observed.

0.7

on normal glass on silanized glass

*

0.6

a pull-off force (mN)

Germany). Glass slides and capillary were cleaned prior to experiments by successive immersions in piranha solution (mixture of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 3 : 1), rinsed with Aqua Millipore water and dried immediately by means of compressed air. To hydrophobize the glass surface, it was silanized with 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane 97% (C10H4Cl3F17Si, SIH5841.0, ABCR GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany). The quality of hydrophobization was tested using OCAH 200 contact angle measurement device (Dataphysics, Filderstadt, Germany; 1 ml of Aqua Millipore water on normal glass: 45.4 + 2.298; on silanized glass: 110.3 + 1.118; n ¼ 10). The free end of the capillary was firmly attached to a force transducer (10 g capacity, Biopac Systems Ltd, Santa Barbara, CA) combined with a motorized micromanipulator DC3314R and a controller MS314 (World Precision Instruments Inc.). The glass slide attached to the capillary tip was moved up and down with a velocity of about 30 mm s21. The slide was brought into contact with the trichome head, preloaded, and then withdrawn. Force – time curves were recorded using ACQKNOWLEDGE v. 3.7.0 software (Biopac Systems, Inc., Goleta, CA) at an acquisition sample rate of 500 Hz, transformed to force – distance curves, from which the pull-off force was estimated (figure 1b). Underwater experiments were carried out in an Aqua Millipore environment. For each substrate type (normal and silanized glass), n ¼ 20 measurements with N ¼ 20 single trichomes were performed at three different environmental conditions: in air, underwater and underwater using trichomes which were submersed in Aqua Millipore water for 24 h prior to measurements. In total, 120 tests were carried out. For statistics, pull-off force values obtained on a single surface type at different conditions were compared using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks, both followed by all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Tukey’s or Dunn’s test) according to the distribution of the data. Differences between pull-off force values on normal and silanized glass surfaces were estimated using Mann–Whitney rank-sum test (SIGMASTAT v. 3.1.1 software, Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA).

0.5 0.4 0.3

A

A b

A 0.2

b 0.1 0

in air

underwater

underwater after 24 h

Figure 3. Box-and-whisker diagram of pull-off force required to break the contact between the trichome secretion and different glass surfaces at different conditions: in air, underwater, and underwater after 24 h of submersion. The ends of the boxes define the 25th and 75th percentiles, with a line at the median and error bars defining the 10th and 90th percentiles. Upper-case letters indicate statistical differences between different conditions on normal glass and lower-case letters on silanized glass, according to Kruskal –Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks and Tukey’s test, p , 0.05 (for normal glass: H2,57 ¼ 2.4, p ¼ 0.307; for silanized glass: H2,57 ¼ 25.2, p 0.001). Asterisks show significant differences between normal and silanized glass at the same condition. For further statistics values, see table 1.

3.2. Adhesion In all trials, adhesive failure was observed, i.e. plant secretion separated from the glass surface without leaving any residue. The pull-off force required to retract an adhering trichome from the surface depended on the surface type and environmental conditions (figure 3 and table 1). On hydrophilic glass, no statistical differences in force between air and underwater environment were found. On hydrophobic glass, both types of underwater experiments resulted in rather low pull-off force compared with those measured in the aerial environment (28% immediately after submersion, and 26% after 24 h of submersion). In air, significantly higher pull-off force was required to pull the secretion from the hydrophobic surface than from the hydrophilic one. In both conditions,


Figure 2. Glandular trichomes of R. gorgonias at different conditions. (a) Adaxial leaf side covered with trichomes in air. (b) Adaxial leaf side covered with trichomes in Aqua Millipore water. (c– e) Short glandular trichome in air (c), in water (d ), after 24 h submersion in Aqua Millipore water (e). tt, long tentacle-shaped trichome; mt, medium-sized trichome; st, short trichome. Scale bars, (a,b) 2 mm, (c– e) 0.2 mm.


condition

T-statistics

p-value

significance

in air

741

0.041

significant

in water in water after

436 446

0.156 0.337

non-significant non-significant

24 h

4. Discussion The secretion of R. gorgonias adhered well to normal and silanized glass in air and underwater. The pull-off force required to retract a short trichome from the hydrophobic glass surface in air was significantly higher than that on the hydrophilic glass [3]. This result may indicate certain secretion

Dsws . Dssg . Dsas ,

(4:1)

produced by silanizing the glass. Our explanation of the unusual behaviour of the pull-off forces is based on these surface tension changes. A partial justification for relation (4.1) derives from exploiting Young’s equation once again: as mentioned above, Aqua Millipore behaves (in air environment) hydrophilic on normal glass, but hydrophobic on silanized glass, that is a . a, implying cos a , cos a, if a and a denote the respective contact angles. Proceeding as above, we obtain with Young’s equation swa cos a 2 swa cos a ¼ sas þ Dsas 2 (sws þ Dsws) 2 sas þ sws ¼ Dsas 2 Dsws , 0, hence Dsws . Dsas ,

(4:2)

which is partial proof to (4.1). The meaning of this relation is that glass silanization affects the interaction between solid (glass) and water molecules more strongly than the interaction between solid and air molecules. Because water is polar, but air is not, and because adhesive secretions produced by various animals and plants seem to have both polar and non-polar properties, it is plausible to assume that the effect of silanization on the interaction between solid and glue is of a moderate magnitude as indicated by equation (4.1).

4


underwater and underwater after 24 h submersion, no significant difference was observed in measured pull-off force values between normal and silanized glass. Considering the secretion droplet diameter of 0.25 mm (cross-sectional area of 0.05 mm2), the adhesive strength (tenacity) underwater was estimated between 3.3 (hydrophilic glass) and 2.2 kPa (silanized glass). Similar to experiments in air, the secretion was pulled into long thin filaments also underwater. The separation distance to interrupt the filament ranged from about 1452 mm on normal glass underwater after 24 h submersion to about 2260 mm on silanized glass underwater, without statistical difference between conditions on silanized glass (Kruskal–Wallis oneway ANOVA on ranks, H5,114 ¼ 1.5, p ¼ 0.472). On normal glass, filaments were statistically longer in air than in water after 24 h (Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks, H5,114 ¼ 10.5, p ¼ 0.005 followed by all pairwise multiple comparison procedure, Tukey’s test, p , 0.05). In the aqueous environment, filaments pulled off from silanized glass were significantly longer than those from normal glass; however, their length on both glass surfaces did not differ in air (table 2). The length of filaments (l ) did not influence the measured pull-off force (Fp) (Fp ¼ 0.20 þ 0.0000477 l, R 2 ¼ 0.01, F1,4 ¼ 0.04, p ¼ 0.85, linear-regression analysis). The work required to retract the trichome from the glass surface was estimated from force–distance curves (figure 1b). It was significantly lower on normal (0.20 J) than on silanized glass (0.37 J) in air (Mann–Whitney rank-sum test, T ¼ 426.5, p ¼ 0.006), and significantly lower in water and 24 h under water than in air (Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks followed by all pairwise multiple comparison procedure, Dunn’s test ( p , 0.05), for normal glass: H2,18 ¼ 15.6, p 0.001; for silanized glass: H2,18 ¼ 19.9, p 0.001). Underwater and 24 h underwater, the work did not differ statistically between normal (0.15, 0.08 J, respectively) and silanized glass (0.14, 0.09 J, respectively). Considering the influence of the length of filaments (l ) on the estimated pull-off work (Wp), a slightly, but not significantly positive trend was observed (Wp ¼ 20.04 þ 0.0000983 l, R 2 ¼ 0.16, F1,4 ¼ 0.74, p ¼ 0.44, linear-regression analysis).

specialization in capturing insects usually having hydrophobic cuticle [18]. Wetting-depending adherence of glues has been previously discussed because of the complexity of influencing factors [19]. Supporting the data on recent studies of trichome adhesion to glass surfaces [3], the secretion of R. gorgonias adhered to normal and silanized glass in air and underwater. As anticipated, the pull-off force required to retract a short trichome from the glass surface differed between hydrophobic and hydrophilic glass surfaces. Surprisingly, glass silanization leads in air to an increase, but underwater to a decrease of the pull-off force. Below, we present a theoretical explanation of this effect. It is based on the assumption that the contact angle u of the glue on the glass surface is within the interval 08 , u , 908 and on the observation that the circumference C of the glue droplet on the glass at pull-off time remains always the same. In air, the pull-off force F on normal glass is given by the expression Fa ¼ sag C sinu, and on silanized glass by Fa ¼ sag C sinu with sag denoting the surface tension s acting on a droplet of plant glue placed on a glass surface under air (the indices a and g indicate air and plant glue, respectively). Similar expressions hold underwater (index w), if sag is replaced by swg, and Fa by Fw. In air, we observed Fa . Fa which implies sinu . sinu, then u . u, and thus cosu , cosu according to well-known properties of the sine and cosine function and to our assumptions on C and u. Denoting changes of the surface tension owing to silanization by D and subtracting Young’s equation [20] sag cosu ¼ sas 2 ssg for normal glass, from its version for silanized glass, sag cosu ¼ sas þ Dsas 2 (ssg þ Dssg), we find sag cosu 2 sag cosu ¼ Dsas 2 Dssg , 0, hence Dssg . Dsas (the index s stands for the solid, i.e. glass). Underwater, the observation that Fw , Fw leads owing to similar reasoning to the result Dsws . Dssg. Thus, the variations of pull-off forces, observed on the different combinations of normal/silanized glass versus air/water conditions, depicted in figure 3, are tantamount to the surface tension changes


Table 1. Statistical differences in pull-off force between normal and silanized glass according to Mann– Whitney rank-sum analysis. See asterisk in figure 3.


Table 2. Median length of filaments (minimum–maximum) into which plant secretion was pulled off during force measurements on different surfaces at various conditions, and statistical differences in filament length between secretion droplets pulled off from normal and silanized glass (Mann–Whitney rank-sum analysis). statistical differences

condition

normal glass

silanized glass

T-statistics

p-value

in air

2493.4 (864.2– 3932.1)

2125.8 (646.7– 3897.3)

452.5

0.256 non-significant

in water in water after 24 h

1081.3 (103.1– 3676.2) 1155.3 (285.4– 3357.7)

2478.4 (1275.4 – 3897.4) 2740.9 (576.4– 3632.4)

322.0 329.5

0.018 significant 0.030 significant

OH-groups, found in the secretion of R. gorgonias [7], represent sites for possible strong polar interactions with hydrophilic substrates. In such structured fluids as plant secretions, monomers have affinity for a fluid boundary [21]. Monoglycerides are known to accumulate at oil –water or air –water interfaces, but not at oil –air interfaces, and smaller molecules of monoglycerides are slightly water-soluble [22]. These facts may explain the curious differences in pull-off forces required to retract the sticky plant secretion from hydrophobic and hydrophilic glass surfaces in air and underwater. Further, the certain solubility of monoglyceride molecules in water may explain the ‘milky’ appearance of plant secretion droplets underwater. Such ‘milky’ appearance is presumably owing to emulsification of external layers of the glue. A similar ‘milkiness’ underwater was observed for submersed adhesive tapes tesafilm (tesa SE, Hamburg, Germany) and Scotch Crystal and Scotch Magic (3M Deutschland GmbH, Neuss, Germany; D. Voigt 2010, unpublished data). Considering also previous observations on hygroscopic properties of R. gorgonias secretion [11], another reason may be swelling in the aqueous environment by ion interactions, as repeatedly reported for resins and elastic materials [23 –25]. Most resins swell more strongly in polar than in less polar solvents, diminishing but not eliminating cohesion and becoming softer and flexible [24,26]. The adhesive strength of 2.2 kPa for R. gorgonias secretion droplets underwater is much lower than those reported for permanent adhering aquatic organisms. However, considering previous results separating a thin layer of R. gorgonias secretion between two glass slides [3], its effective adhesive strength may be expected about 15 times higher than the currently estimated values from pull-off forces necessary to detach secretion droplets on trichomes from glass. For example, compared with the plaque of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. (Mollusca, Mytiloidea, Mytilidae), adhering to a smooth glass surface (316 and 750 kPa), and the adult barnacle Balanus balanoides L. (Arthropoda, Cirripedia), adhering to a slate surface (930 kPa), the underwater adhesive strength of the plant secretion is 9–26 times lower [27 –29]. It rather corresponds to that found in organisms having transitory underwater adhesion, for example 19 kPa in the beadled anemone Actinia equina L. (Anthozoa, Actiniidae) or 43 kPa in the plumose anemone Metridium senile L. (Anthozoa, Metridiidae; review by Scherge & Gorb [15]). In contrast to the permanent nature of adhesion of proteinaceous aquatic glues [15,16], the secretion of R. gorgonias does not cure or dry out [11]. Recently, this glue has been shown to behave similarly to pressure-sensitive adhesives, in which resins are known as tackifiers [3,30]. Epoxy-based


This study demonstrates for the first time that R. gorgonias secretion adheres underwater (figure 3). The appearance of long, thin, extensible and recoverable fluid filaments resulting from pulling the adhesive droplets in the aqueous environment supports previous assumptions about the viscoelastic property and strong cohesion of the secretion [2]. Extended force –distance curves, showing maximum initial peak and several following lower peaks (figure 1b), indicate large extension of secretion droplets into filaments (this effect is called fibrillation) and their previously discussed composite structure consisting of a fibrous network embedded in a fluid matrix [2]. This behaviour of secretion lets us suppose the presence of flows in the moving liquid (secretion) and did not differ in air and underwater. According to previous results, there is no significant influence of the length of filaments on the measured pull-off force [2]. Assuming the filaments as small springs glued to glass, having the same glued area, the force does not depend on how the springs are extended. Their extension will be different depending on stiffness. Spring deformation does not correlate with the glue strength. However, significantly longer filaments of secretion droplets suggest larger viscous dissipation, i.e. a higher internal friction of molecules in the secretion matrix and thus a strong resistance to separation, as on normal glass in air and on silanized glass in air, underwater and 24 h underwater. The filament length did not significantly correspond to the work required to retract the trichome from the glass surface; however, a slight positive trend was observed. In air, two times more work had to be applied to separate the secretion droplet from silanized glass (0.37 J) than from normal glass (0.20 J) and living blowfly Calliphora vicina Rob.-Des. (Diptera, Calliphoridae; 0.18 J), as was shown in previous studies [2]. Underwater, the work was similar for both glass types (normal: 0.15 J, silanized: 0.14 J), roughly corresponding to values obtained for blowflies [2]. After 24 h underwater, significantly lower work than in air and underwater had to be generated on both glasses (normal: 0.08 J, silanized: 0.09 J), resembling that previously estimated on the ‘sloughing-off’ surface of bugs Pameridea roridulae Reuter (Heteropera, Miridae; 0.07 J). Roridula gorgonias secretion may attach in air and underwater on both polar and non-polar surfaces. That is why one may assume that adhesive secretion should be able to remove or adsorb boundary water layer from the surface of the solid substrate [17]. The major known components of the secretion of R. gorgonias are non-polar. For example, high-molecular-weight triterpenoids may cause its insolubility and water repellency. On the other hand, significant concentrations of mono- and diacylglycerides and their free


length of filaments (mm) on

5


Acknowledgements. K. Keller (Augsburg, Germany) kindly provided plants and valuable information. The first author thanks M. Varenberg (Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel) for his valuable comments and corrections and M. Voigt (Zwickau/ Sa., Germany) for motivating discussions.

Funding statement. This study was partly supported by the COST Action TD0906.

References 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8. 9.

Marloth R. 1910 Further observations on the biology of Roridula. Trans. R. Soc. South Afr. 2, 59 –62. (doi:10.1080/00359191009519362) Voigt D, Gorb SN. 2008 An insect trap as habitat: cohesion-failure mechanism prevents adhesion of Pameridea roridulae bugs to the sticky surface of the plant Roridula gorgonias. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2647 – 2657. (doi:10.1242/jeb.019273) Voigt D, Gorb EV, Gorb SN. 2009 Hierarchical organisation of the trap in the protocarnivorous plant Roridula gorgonias Roridulaceae. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 3184–3191. (doi:10.1242/ jeb.034280) Marloth R. 1903 Some recent observations on the biology of Roridula. Ann. Bot. 17, 151–158. Ellis AG, Midgley JJ. 1996 A new plant-animal mutualism involving a plant with sticky leaves and a resisdent hemipteran insect. Oecologia 106, 478–481. (doi:10.1007/BF00329705) Hartmeyer S. 1998 Carnivory in Byblis revisited II, the phenomenon of symbiosis on insect trapping plants. Carnivorous Plant Newsl. 27, 110–113. Simoneit BRT, Medeiros PM, Wollenweber E. 2008 Triterpenoids as major components of the insecttrapping glue of Roridula species. Z. Naturforsch. 63c, 625– 630. Marloth R. 1925 Flora of South Africa, vol. 2, Part I. pp. 26– 30. Cambridge, UK: University Press. Lloyd FE. 1934 Is Roridula a carnivorous plant? Can. J. Res. 10, 780– 786. (doi:10.1139/ cjr34-066)

10. Bruce AN. 1907 On the distribution, structure, and function of the tentacles of Roridula. Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 17, 83– 98. 11. Voigt D, Gorb SN. 2010 Desiccation resistance of adhesive secretion in the protocarnivorous plant Roridula gorgonias as an adaptation to periodically dry environment. Planta 232, 1511 –1515. (doi:10. 1007/s00425-010-1270-2) 12. Manning J. 2004 SASOL first field guide to Fynbos of Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Struik Publishers. 13. Lloyd FE. 1942 The carnivorous plants. New York, NY: The Ronald Press Company. 14. Barthlott W, Porembski S, Seine R, Theisen I. 2004 Karnivoren. Biologie und Kultur fleischfressender Pflanzen. Stuttgart, Germany: Ulmer Verlag. 15. Scherge M, Gorb SN. 2001 Biological micro- and nanotribology. Nature’s solutions. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 16. Flammang P. 2006 Adhesive secretions in echinoderms: an overview. In Biological adhesives (eds AM Smith, JA Callow), pp. 183 –203. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 17. Waite JH. 1987 Nature’s underwater adhesive specialist. Int. J. Adhes. Adhesives 7, 9–14. (doi:10. 1016/0143-7496(87)90048-0) 18. Locke M. 1964 The structure and formation of the integument in insects. In The physiology of insecta (ed. M Rockstein), pp. 123–213. New York, NY: Academic Press. 19. Rasche M. 1991 Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen Benetzbarkeit und Haftung? Drauf & Dran 1991/1, 4 –8 and 19 –20.

20. Young T. 1805 An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 95, 65 –87. (doi:10.1098/ rstl.1805.0005) 21. Witten T, Pinus P. 2004 Structured fluids. Polymers, colloids, surfactants. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 22. To¨lpel A. 2007 Chemie und Physik der Milch. Naturstoff, Rohstoff, Lebensmittel, 2. Auflage, Hamburg: Behrs. 23. Bodamer GW, Kunin R. 1953 Behavior of ion exchange resins in solvents other than water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 2577–2580. (doi:10.1021/ie50527a057) 24. Mantanis GI, Young RA, Rowell RM. 1994 Swelling of wood. Part 1. Swelling in water. Wood Sci. Technol. 28, 119– 134. 25. Miller WS, Castagna CJ, Pieper AW. 2009 Understanding ion-exchange resins for water treatment systems. GE Water Process Technol. TP1050EN, 1–13. 26. Helfferich F. 1995 Ion exchange. New York, NY: Dover Publications. 27. DeVore DP, Gruebel RJ. 1978 Dityrosine in adhesive formed by the sea mussel Mytilus edulis. Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 80, 993–999. (doi:10.1016/ 0006-291X(78)91343-8) 28. Yule AB, Walker G. 1984 The adhesion of the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, to slate surfaces. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 64, 147–156. (doi:10.1017/ S0025315400059695) 29. Maruyama N, Etoh H, Sakata K, Ina K. 1991 Studies on phenoloxidase from Mytilus edulis associated with adhesion. Agric. Biol. Chem. 55, 2887– 2889. (doi:10.1271/bbb1961.55.2887)

6


washed out by rain are not that high, and the properties can be quickly re-established after rain. But in the case of 100% of non-water-based glue, the loss will be very substantial. We hypothesize two extreme strategies in sticky glandular hairy carnivory plants (flypapers): (i) cheap and quickly re-establishable and (ii) costly, but waterproof and desiccation-resistant adhesives. Because of a broad range of underwater applications in various fields, ranging from marine technology to medicine, current research interest in innovative reversible and reusable underwater adhesives increases [34–36]. Because traditional epoxy systems with strong reliable underwater bonding [31] are commonly known to be toxic, non-toxic adhesives of biological origin could offer a very promising alternative. That is why more detailed knowledge about the chemical composition of the R. gorgonias secretion might be potentially interesting as an inspiration for technical adhesives with underwater adhesive ability.


resin systems are commonly used as permanent adhesives for commercial applications in humid environments [31]. Thus, the secretion of R. gorgonias should be suitable for temporary adhesion, also in an aqueous environment. However, because the permanence of glue bonds is rather significant than their initial adherence [19], long-term studies on attachment performance should be subsequently undertaken to prove the reliability of Roridula glue. Because rainwater cannot dissolve or dilute the secretion, the plant may not have to renew secretory fluid after each rain or morning dew. This might be important for the plant to maintain similar adhesive ability at various weather conditions in its habitat. Additionally, the use of persistent resinous secretion could save energy because of no need of resetting secretion after each rain and dry weather periods [11]. Such an adaptation clearly provides strong selective advantages of such an adhesive mechanism for the fynbos biome, if compared with the water-soluble glues found in species of the carnivorous flypaper plant genera Drosera, Drosophyllum or Byblis, growing in rather humid habitats [13,14]. Secretion of those plants has been reported to be aqueous solution of mucopolysaccharides [32,33]. One explanation why the polysaccharide strategy is evolutionarily stable is that the Drosera glue has only 4% of the solid substance (the rest is water) [33]. That is why the costs to be


Protoplasmaforschung, Bd. 8, Physiologie des Protoplasmas. New York, NY: Springer. 33. Rost K, Schauer R. 1977 Physical and chemical properties of the mucin secreted by Drosera capensis. Phytochemistry 16, 1365– 1368. (doi:10. 1016/S0031-9422(00)88783-X) 34. Varenberg M, Gorb SN. 2007 A beetle-inspired solution for underwater adhesion. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 383– 385. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1171)

35. Majumder A, Sharma A, Ghatak A. 2010 A bioinspired wet/dry microfluidic adhesive for aqueous environments. Langmuir 26, 521– 525. (doi:10.1021/la9021849) 36. Dodou D, Breedveld P, de Winter JCF, Dankelman J, Leeuwen JL. 2010 Mechanisms of temporary adhesion in benthic animals. Biol. Rev. 86, 15 –32. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010. 00132.x)

7


30. Dahlquist CA. 1969 Pressure-sensitive adhesives. In Treatise on adhesion and adhesives, vol. 2 (ed. RL Patrick), pp. 219 –260. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. 31. Habenicht G. 2002 Kleben, Grundlagen, Technologien, Anwendung, 4th edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 32. Schnepf E. 1969 Sekretion und Exkretion bei Pflanzen. Protoplasmatologia, Handbuch der
