Airway Management in Critical Illness

0 downloads 0 Views 672KB Size Report
Mar 2, 2007 - significant endotracheal tube (ETT) misplacement,. *From the ...... 58 Hsu Y-W, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, et al. ... Force, torque, and.

Airway Management in Critical Illness J. Matthias Walz, Maksim Zayaruzny and Stephen O. Heard Chest 2007;131;608-620 DOI 10.1378/chest.06-2120

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services can be found online on the World Wide Web at:

CHEST is the official journal of the American College of Chest Physicians. It has been published monthly since 1935. Copyright 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook IL 60062. All rights reserved. No part of this article or PDF may be reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of the copyright holder ( ISSN: 0012-3692.

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians



Airway Management in Critical Illness* J. Matthias Walz, MD, FCCP; Maksim Zayaruzny, MD; and Stephen O. Heard, MD, FCCP

Airway management in the ICU can be complicated due to many factors including the limited physiologic reserve of the patient. As a consequence, the likelihood of difficult mask ventilation and intubation increases. The incidence of failed airways and of cardiac arrest related to airway instrumentation in the ICU is much higher than that of elective intubations performed in the operating room. A thorough working knowledge of the devices available for the management of the difficult airway and recommended rescue strategies is paramount in avoiding bad patient outcomes. In this review, we will provide a conceptual framework for airway assessment, with an emphasis on assessment of the patient with limited cervical spine movement or injury and of morbidly obese patients. Furthermore, we will review the devices that are available for airway management in the ICU, and discuss controversies surrounding interventions like cricoid pressure and the use of muscle relaxants in the critically ill patient. Finally, strategies for the safe extubation of patients with known difficult airways will be provided. (CHEST 2007; 131:608 – 620) Key words: airway management; critical care; intubation Abbreviations: AEC ⫽ airway exchange catheter; ASA ⫽ American Society of Anesthesiologists; DAA ⫽ difficult airway algorithm; DI ⫽ difficult intubation; ETT ⫽ endotracheal tube; FOI ⫽ fiberoptic intubation; LMA ⫽ laryngeal mask airway; NIPPV ⫽ noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation; PDT ⫽ percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy; RSI ⫽ rapid sequence intubation

in airway management is an important E xpertise skill for any health-care provider who is caring for critically ill patients. Due to advances in training and technology, elective airway management within the confines of the operating room is associated with very low rates of complications.1 These observations are in stark contrast to emergent airway management in the ICU. Complication rates in the ICU environment are much higher due to the limited physiologic reserve and comorbidities of the patient, as well as *From the Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA. The authors have reported to the ACCP that no significant conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article. Manuscript received August 24, 2006; revision accepted November 1, 2006. Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal. org/misc/reprints.shtml). Correspondence to: J. Matthias Walz, MD, FCCP, Department of Anesthesiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester MA 01655; e-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-2120

the inability, in the majority of cases, to perform a thorough evaluation of the patient’s anatomy prior to airway instrumentation. Furthermore, some of the induction agents that are suitable for airway management in the elective setting may be contraindicated in critically ill patients, further limiting the options for airway instrumentation. In a systematic study of complications associated with airway management in the ICU, Schwartz and colleagues2 reported major complications in a significant number of patients. Among the problems encountered were difficult intubations (DIs) [8%], esophageal intubations (8%), and pulmonary aspiration (4%), and an associated mortality rate of 3%. There was a significant correlation between the presence of hypotension at the time of intubation and cardiac arrest in this study.2 Kollef et al3 reviewed retrospectively over a 12-month period 278 patients requiring endotracheal intubation in an acute care military hospital. They found that almost 10% of patients (22 patients) had at least one significant endotracheal tube (ETT) misplacement,


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

and 23% of these individuals experienced serious complications.3 A recent prospective, observational multicenter study4 performed in French ICUs found at least one severe complication in 28% of all intubations, with an overall rate of cardiac arrest related to endotracheal intubation in the ICU of 2%. The presence of acute respiratory failure and the presence of shock as the indication for endotracheal intubation were independent risk factors for complications, whereas supervision by a senior physician appeared to have a protective effect.4 In a study5 on the frequency and outcomes of unplanned endotracheal extubations in a university trauma-surgical ICU, difficulty with reintubation (multiple or prolonged attempts) or need for a fiberoptic bronchoscope was a common occurrence (20%). The authors concluded that highly skilled airway management is necessary to avoid adverse outcomes related to reintubation.5 The implementation of training programs for ICU staff, immediate access to advanced airway devices, and knowledge and incorporation of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm (DAA) [Fig 1] may decrease the incidence of serious complications related to airway instrumentation in the ICU. In a retrospective review of 3,035 critically ill patients undergoing emergency airway management, Mort6 analyzed two time periods, 1990 to 1995 and 1995 to 2002, after the implementation of a protocol requiring the availability of advanced airway equipment at the bedside. Cardiac arrest within 5 min of intubation occurred in 2% of the patients overall. However, the rate was reduced by 50% between the first and the second time period analyzed (1990 to 1995, 2.8%; 1995 to 2002, 1.4%).6 In this review, we assume that the reader has a working knowledge of airway anatomy and of the technique for routine endotracheal intubation. Accordingly, we consider aspects of the use of medications, strategies for airway assessment prior to intubation, and some technical approaches to airway management in critically ill patients. Controversies surrounding airway management such as rapid sequence intubation (RSI), the merit of cricoid pressure and the sniffing position, as well as the risks associated with the use of muscle relaxants will be discussed. Furthermore, we will provide strategies for the safe extubation of the patient with a known difficult airway.

Airway Assessment Assessing a patient’s airway prior to performing a potentially difficult endotracheal intubation is challenging in the best of circumstances; in the critically

ill patient with severe respiratory distress or failure, it may be virtually impossible. There is some controversy as to what assessment tool has the best predictive value for DI; however, a focused and brief examination of the patient’s airway may substantially influence the strategy for airway management and the success of the procedure. An initial step in assessment is to determine the need for invasive vs noninvasive ventilatory support. If the patient needs invasive ventilatory support, the individual should quickly be assessed for (1) the risk for difficult mask ventilation and (2) the risk for DI. Independent risk factors for difficult mask ventilation in the elective setting include age of ⬎ 55 years, body mass index of ⬎26 kg/m2, lack of teeth, male gender, Mallampati class 4 airway, the presence of a beard, and a history of snoring.7,8 Whether these factors can be extrapolated to critically ill patients is unknown; however, it seems prudent to include them into the analysis in order to decrease the likelihood of a “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” scenario. Several clinical indicators for DI have been validated (Table 1). While the positive predictive values of these tests alone or in combination are not particularly high, a straightforward intubation can be anticipated if the test results are negative.9 For a recent review on the common clinical predictors of DI see the study by Reynolds and Heffner.10 Since only about 30% of airways in the emergency setting can be evaluated in this fashion, additional evaluation methods have been devised. Murphy and Walls11 have introduced the LEMON (ie, Look, [e]Mallampati class, Obstruction, and Neck mobility) airway assessment method to stratify the risk of DI in the emergency department. Furthermore, Reed et al12 were able to demonstrate that patients with large incisors, a reduced mouth opening, and a reduced thyroid-tofloor-of-mouth distance are more likely to have a poor airway grade during laryngoscopy.

Preparation for Endotracheal Intubation Being prepared for unforeseen complications during endotracheal intubation is of prime importance when instrumenting airway of a critically ill patient. Furthermore, conditions for intubation should be as close to ideal as possible in a busy ICU environment, and should include adequate personnel, optimal patient positioning and lighting, and the necessary equipment for endotracheal intubation. A supply of 100% oxygen, a well-fitting mask with attached bag-valve device (which should be checked for valve competency prior to use), suctioning equipment, a Magill forceps, and oral and nasal airways should be immediately available. The bed should be positioned CHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians


Figure 1. The ASA DAA: practice guidelines for the management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the ASA Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Reprinted with permission from Christie et al.5

at the proper height with the wheels locked, and a laryngoscope with blades of various sizes (straight and curved) should be available. The laryngoscope batteries and light should be checked on a routine basis. Traditional teaching recommends placing the patient in the “sniffing” position, in which the neck is

flexed and the head is slightly extended about the atlantooccipital joint in order to align the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes.13 An MRI study14 has called this concept into question, as the alignment of the three axes could not be achieved in any of the three positions tested (ie, neutral, simple head extension, and the sniffing position). In a randomized


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

Table 1—Components of the Preoperative Airway Physical Examination* Airway Examination Component

Nonreassuring Findings

Length of upper incisors Relation of maxillary and mandibular incisors during normal jaw closure Relation of maxillary and mandibular incisors during voluntary protrusion Interincisor distance Visibility of uvula

Relatively long Prominent “overbite” (ie, maxillary incisors anterior to mandibular incisors) Patient cannot bring mandibular incisors anterior to (in front of) maxillary incisors ⬍ 3 cm Not visible when tongue is protruded with patient in sitting position (eg, Mallampati class ⬎ II) Highly arched or very narrow Stiff, indurated, occupied by mass, or nonresilient Less than three ordinary finger breadths Short Thick Patient cannot touch tip of chin to chest or cannot extend neck

Shape of palate Compliance of mandibular space Thyromental distance Length of neck Thickness of neck Range of motion of head and neck

*This table displays some findings of the airway physical examination that may suggest the presence of a difficult intubation. The decision to examine some or all of the airway components shown in this table depends on the clinical context and the judgment of the practitioner. The table is not intended as a mandatory or exhaustive list of the components of an airway examination. The order of presentation in this table follows the “line of sight” that occurs during conventional oral laryngoscopy. Reprinted with permission from Christie et al.5

study15 conducted in general surgery patients, simple head extension was as effective as the sniffing position in facilitating tracheal intubation. Nonetheless, the sniffing position appears to provide an advantage in obese patients and in patients who have limited head extension. The utility of the sniffing position for intubations outside of the operating room is unknown. Preoxygenation prior to airway instrumentation is important and is usually facilitated with the administration of oxygen via a nonrebreathing face mask and bag-valve mask device. It is important to note, however, that patients with respiratory failure due to cardiopulmonary disease may not have an adequate response to conventional preoxygenation. Mort16 was able to demonstrate that only 50% of patients in this category have an increase in Pao2 of ⬎ 5% above baseline values with conventional preoxygenation of 4 min duration. To address this problem, Baillard and coworkers17 conducted a prospective, randomized study in a cohort of medical/ surgical ICU patients comparing preoxygenation prior to endotracheal intubation with the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to a bag-valve mask device for 3 min duration. The application of NIPPV ensured better pulse oximetric saturation and Pao2 values during tracheal intubation and up to 5 min into the postintubation period compared to the conventional preoxygenation method.17 For a complete checklist of the supplies needed for endotracheal intubation, see Table 2. After successful endotracheal intubation, it is of vital importance to confirm proper tube positioning. Methods to ascertain the position of the tube within the trachea include bilateral auscultation of the chest and measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide by

standard capnography if available, or by means of colorimetric chemical detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide (eg, Easy Cap II; Nellcor, Inc; Pleasanton, CA). The colorimetric detector is attached to the proximal end of the ETT and changes color on exposure to carbon dioxide. An additional method for detecting esophageal intubation uses a bulb that attaches to the proximal end of the ETT.18 When squeezed, the bulb will reexpand if it is in the trachea, but will remain collapsed with esophageal placement of the ETT. None of these methods is absolutely reliable; fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the only way to document ETT placement with absolute certainty. Given the potentially serious conse-

Table 2—Equipment Needed for Intubation* Supply of 100% oxygen Face mask Bag valve device with PEEP valve End-tidal CO2 detector Suction equipment Suction catheters Large-bore tonsil suction apparatus (Yankauer) Stylet Magill forceps Oral airways Nasal airways Laryngoscope handle and blades (curved, straight; various sizes) Endotracheal tubes (various sizes) Tongue depressors Syringe for cuff inflation Headrest Supplies for vasoconstriction and local anesthesia Tape Tincture of benzoin *PEEP ⫽ positive end-expiratory pressure. CHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians


quences of esophageal intubation, auscultation of the chest should always be combined with one additional test. Furthermore, a postintubation chest radiograph should always be obtained. Some of the most common complications of endotracheal intubation are listed in Table 3; for a comprehensive review on the subject see Hagberg et al.19 The following two patient populations deserve special mention: the morbidly obese patient; and the critically ill patient with known or suspected cervical spine injuries. In a recent review20 of 4,000 patients in the Australian Incident Monitoring Study, obesity and limited neck mobility were among the most common anatomic factors contributing to DI and/or a failed airway. Morbid Obesity Morbidly obese patients are more prone to hypoxemia than individuals of normal weight due to reductions in expiratory reserve volume, FVC, FEV1, functional residual capacity, and maximum voluntary ventilation.21 Due to body habitus, laryngeal exposure may be difficult. In addition, since repositioning a morbidly obese patient may be impossible if difficulties during laryngoscopy and/or intubation are encountered, careful patient positioning and choice of airway management is vitally important. Collins and coworkers22 compared the difference between the “sniff” and “ramped” positions in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery with respect to the quality of the laryngeal view obtained. They were able to demonstrate significantly better laryngeal views when a ramped position was achieved by arranging blankets underneath the patient’s body and head until horizontal alignment was achieved between the external auditory meatus and the sternal notch.22 It is conceivable that this would

Table 3—Selected Complications of Endotracheal Intubation Complications


Traumatic complications

Corneal abrasion Dental damage Perforation or laceration of pharynx, larynx, trachea, or esophagus Vocal cord injury Dislocation of an arytenoid cartilage Mainstem bronchus intubation Aspiration Hypotension Arrhythmias Hypoxia Hypercarbia Laryngeal spasm Bronchospasm

Hemodynamic and other complications

also improve laryngeal exposure in morbidly obese patients in the ICU setting. If there is concern about the adequacy of the mask airway to maintain oxygenation, use of an awake fiberoptic intubation (FOI) technique should always be considered. C-Spine Injuries and Immobility Managing the airway of a patient with limited neck mobility or cervical spine injury on an emergent basis requires careful planning and significant experience in order to avoid morbidity and mortality. Retrospective studies23–27 have suggested that neurologic deterioration in patients with cervical spine injuries is uncommon after airway management, even in highrisk patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation. These studies23–27 are limited, however, by their small sample size. While not all cervical spine injuries result in clinical instability, the results of initial radiographic studies in critically ill patients are often unknown at the time the airway has to be managed, and cervical spine precautions during airway instrumentation should be maintained. The reader is referred to a comprehensive review on airway management after cervical spine injury.28 Manual in-line immobilization during endotracheal intubation appears to be safe and effective for the prevention of morbidity that is related to airway instrumentation in patients with cervical spine injuries. Removing the anterior portion of the cervical collar while maintaining manual in-line immobilization is associated with less spinal movement than cervical collar immobilization during laryngoscopy and therefore should be routinely performed.29,30 Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that cricoid pressure does not result in deleterious cervical movement in a patient with an injured upper cervical spine.31 While there is no evidence in the literature to demonstrate the superiority of one mode of endotracheal intubation over the other, the authors of this review believe that awake FOI techniques should be strongly considered in the setting of limited neck mobility and cervical spine injuries. For patients with cervical stabilization in a halo device, the ability to perform a surgical airway, should conventional attempts for airway management fail, may be lifesaving. Conditions other than trauma that are associated with a decreased range of motion include any cause of degenerative disk disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis) and age ⬎ 70 years. Caution should also be exercised in patients with previous cervical spine instrumentation that may result in unanticipated difficult airway, necessitating fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation32 or intubation through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA).


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

RSI and Muscle Relaxants Since the majority of ICU patients requiring endotracheal intubation should be considered to have a full stomach, securing the airway with a rapidsequence intubation (originally termed rapid sequence induction in the operating room setting) therefore seems logical. There are, however, several caveats to consider before embarking on an airway management strategy that may leave very few options short of surgical airway intervention should the intensivist unexpectedly encounter a “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate scenario.” Furthermore, there are several contraindications to the use of succinylcholine in critically ill patients, thus eliminating the fastest and most reliable muscle relaxant that is used to facilitate rapid sequence endotracheal intubation (see the next section).33 Prior to administering drugs to facilitate airway management in the ICU, a decision should be made about whether spontaneous breathing should be preserved or ablated during endotracheal intubation. Controversies in RSI The classic teaching of RSI includes the application of cricoid pressure to avoid the regurgitation of gastric contents into the lung. Initially described by Sellick34 in 1961, this concept has been questioned by an MRI study35 of awake volunteers. Smith et al35 were able to demonstrate that the esophagus was lateral to the larynx in ⬎ 50% of the subjects. Moreover, cricoid pressure increased the incidence of an unoccluded esophagus (by 50% and caused airway compression of ⬎ 1 mm in 81% of the subjects studied. There are, however, cadaver studies demonstrating the efficacy of cricoid pressure36 and clinical studies showing that gastric insufflation with air during mask ventilation is reduced when cricoid pressure is applied.37 While cricoid pressure may or may not decrease the risk of aspiration, there is evidence that it may worsen the quality of laryngeal exposure.38,39 In a randomized intervention study on human cadavers involving emergency medicine physicians, a total of 1,530 sets of comparative laryngoscopies were performed by 104 participants. In this study, bimanual laryngoscopy (external laryngeal manipulation by the endoscopist with the free hand) improved the view compared to the application of cricoid pressure, application of back, upward, and right pressure on the thyroid cartilage (also referred to as BURP), or no manipulation. Cricoid pressure and back, upward, and right pressure on the thyroid cartilage frequently worsened the view on laryngoscopy.40 In a critical appraisal of the available literature, including 241 articles on the topic of cricoid pressure, Butler and Sen41 concluded that

there is little evidence to support the widely held belief that the application of cricoid pressure reduces the incidence of aspiration during RSI. As the application of cricoid pressure may have adverse effects, a careful analysis of the risks and benefits should be performed on an individual basis until more systematic studies are performed.

Choices of Drugs Emergent airway management in the ICU is frequently complicated by the patient’s limited physiologic reserve, which will often manifest as hypotension immediately after tracheal intubation. The exact incidence of morbidity and mortality related to airway management facilitated by the use of IV induction agents in the ICU is unknown; however, it is likely to be underreported. Several comprehensive reviews42 on pharmacologic agents used for airway management in the ICU have been published; we will therefore provide a brief overview of commonly used agents and discuss controversies surrounding their use. Propofol Propofol is a popular hypnotic agent for several reasons. It is associated with pleasant emergence and little hangover, is readily titratable, and has more rapid onset and offset kinetics than midazolam. In patients with cardiac comorbidities and limited physiologic reserve, it can be associated with significant hypotension, thus limiting its use in this patient population. In an analysis of 4,096 patients undergoing general anesthesia, Reich and coworkers43 reported that ASA physical status class III to V, baseline mean arterial pressure of ⬍ 70 mm Hg, age ⬎ 50 years, and the use of propofol were statistically significant multivariate predictors of hypotension. In the 2,406 patients with retrievable outcome data, prolonged postoperative hospital stay and/or death were more common in the patient group that experienced hypotension.43 While propofol provides superior conditions for endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants compared to sodium pentothal, it induces more hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures.44 This adds to previous evidence indicating that propofol may not be safe for high-risk patients with known cardiac dysfunction.45 Whether or not data obtained in the operating room environment can be extrapolated to the ICU setting is unknown; however, the independent risk factors cited previously certainly apply to the majority of patients who are in need of emergent airway management in the ICU. CHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians


Etomidate Etomidate has onset and offset pharmacokinetic characteristics that are similar to propofol, and lacks significant effects on myocardial contractility (even in the setting of cardiomyopathy), which make it one of the preferred induction agents for airway management in critically ill patients. When it was studied46 in a heterogeneous group of patients undergoing RSI in the emergency department, etomidate provided good intubation conditions with very few hemodynamic derangements, even in those patients with low BP prior to airway instrumentation. Nevertheless, the role of etomidate in clinical practice is in question due to its effect on adrenal production of steroids. Etomidate inhibits adrenal steroidogenesis through the inhibition of mitochondrial hydroxylase, both after a single dose and continuous administration.47– 49 Based on the available evidence, the use of etomidate in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock should be discouraged.50 If patients who are in septic shock receive etomidate, corticosteroid supplementation to prevent unnecessary deaths is recommended. Since the adrenal suppression by the drug lasts longer than previously estimated (up to 72 h), some authors51,52 have questioned the use of etomidate in critically ill patients altogether. Ketamine Ketamine is unique among the hypnotic agents in that it has analgesic, sedative, and amnestic effects. It has a slower onset and offset compared to propofol or etomidate following IV infusion, and stimulates the cardiovascular system (ie, raises heart rate and BP by direct stimulation of the CNS). In the usual dosage, ketamine decreases airway resistance. Whether ketamine, when administered as an adjunct during emergent airway management in the ICU, provides adequate intubation conditions has not been studied in a systematic fashion. When compared to sodium pentothal in a dose of 5 mg/kg, ketamine (2.5 mg/kg) will provide superior intubation conditions 1 min after the administration of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) in the elective surgery setting.53 These findings are supported by a more recent prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial54 in which the administration of ketamine resulted in excellent intubation conditions in a significantly higher proportion of elective surgery patients when compared to the administration of sodium pentothal. Ketamine also appears to be a useful adjunct to etomidate when RSI is performed with rocuronium. The combination of ketamine with etomidate and rocuronium resulted in superior intubation conditions in a prospective, randomized clinical trial55 of patients undergoing elective surgery when

compared to the combination of etomidate, fentanyl, and rocuronium, or etomidate with rocuronium, respectively. In the ICU, this combination may be useful for treating hemodynamically unstable patients with contraindications to the use of succinylcholine who are in need of emergent airway management facilitated by a neuromuscular blocker. The use of ketamine in patients with increased intracranial pressure is controversial; in this setting, it should be administered only after a careful risk-benefit analysis.56 Dexmedetomidine Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting, selective ␣2 receptor agonist that has been approved for use in the United States for the short-term sedation of critically ill patients.57 The drug may be useful for the awake, fiberoptic management of the airway in the ICU due to its analgesic, anxiolytic, and sedative effects without causing clinically significant respiratory depression.58 There have been case reports59,60 documenting the usefulness of dexmedetomidine for awake FOI in the operating room setting among patients undergoing elective surgery; however, no data are available regarding its use as an adjunct to airway management in the ICU. Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Succinylcholine: The use of succinylcholine (1 mg/kg IV) will result in excellent intubation conditions in ⬍ 1 min. Unless there are contraindications, it is the drug of choice when the airway must be secured quickly (ie, in the patient with a full stomach or with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux). The drug may trigger malignant hyperthermia in genetically susceptible persons, and can cause a malignant rise in extracellular potassium concentration in patients with major acute burns, upper or lower motor neuron lesions, prolonged immobility, massive crush injuries, and various myopathies.61,62 Infrequently, the use of succinylcholine can be associated with prolonged paralysis due to decreased plasma cholinesterase activity.63 Caution is also advised concerning its use in patients with open globe injuries, renal failure, and serious infections, and in neardrowning victims.42 Patients who are in a state of prolonged immobility are at a heightened risk of hyperkalemia when exposed to succinylcholine due to changes in the regulation and distribution of acetylcholine receptors during a course of critical illness, in particular the postsynaptic up-regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the expression of immature receptors. The up-regulation of receptors during periods of immobilization have been


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

described as early as 6 to 12 h into the disease process. Therefore, we recommend avoiding the use of succinylcholine in critically ill patients beyond 24 h in those with burns and spinal cord injury, and beyond 48 to 72 h of immobilization and/or denervation. For a comprehensive review on succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia, see the article by Martyn and Richtsfeld.64 Rocuronium: Of the currently available non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, rocuronium has the fastest onset of action and represents the only alternative to succinylcholine for use during RSI. In a dose of 0.8 to 1.2 mg/kg, rocuronium will provide excellent intubation conditions within 60 s. When compared to succinylcholine in a randomized, clinical trial65,66 on tracheal intubation in emergency cases, the two agents were equivalent with respect to acceptable intubation conditions and the number of failed intubation attempts. Succinylcholine (1 mg/kg) provided superior intubation conditions when compared to rocuronium in this trial; however, the dose of rocuronium that was used (0.6 mg/kg) was on the low end of the dosage range recommended for RSI.65,66 These results were confirmed by a more recent trial67 demonstrating superior intubation conditions for RSI with the use of succinylcholine (1 mg/kg) compared to rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), but no difference in the rate of adverse airway effects.67 A metaanalysis68 by the Cochrane Collaborative Group concluded that the intubating conditions achieved with the use of rocuronium are not statistically different from those achieved with succinylcholine when propofol is used as an induction agent.

Ways To Establish the Airway Three principal modalities are available for the delivery of mechanical ventilation to a critically ill patient. These are NIPPV via face mask, extraglottic airway devices (eg, various LMAs, an esophagealtracheal device [Combitube ETC; Tyco-HealthcareKendall USA; Mansfield, MA], or a perilaryngeal airway), or the endotracheal route (eg, ETT or tracheostoma). The most commonly practiced technique for endotracheal intubation is direct laryngoscopy with either a curved blade (Macintosh blade) or a straight blade (Miller blade) of various sizes. The choice of blade shape is a matter of personal preference; however, one study69 has suggested that less force and head extension are required when performing direct laryngoscopy with a straight blade. With respect to blade material, plastic single-use blades are inexpensive and carry a lower risk of infection when compared to metal reusable blades.

Nevertheless, their use in a critical care setting should be discouraged. In a prospective randomized trial70 of 284 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia requiring RSI, plastic laryngoscope blades were less efficient than metal blades, resulting in a significantly higher rate of failed intubation on the first attempt. Several laryngoscope blades to facilitate DIs have been introduced in the past. These include, but are not limited to, the McCoy angulated blade, the Dorges blade, the Viewmax laryngoscope blade (Rusch; Duluth, GA) with a patented lens system, as well as blades augmented by video or fiberoptic capabilities (eg, the Bullard Laryngoscope; ACMI: Southborough, MA; or the GlideScope; Verithon; Bothell, WA; or the WuScope; Achi Corp; San Jose, CA). There are no data on the utility of these tools for airway management in the ICU. In a trial comparing the alternative blades with standard blades on a human patient simulator, the Dorges and McCoy blades did not perform any better than the standard Macintosh blade either in easy or difficult tracheal intubation conditions.71 However, there are data from patients undergoing elective or emergent intubation in the operating room as well as from trials using cadavers and mannequins (some in the setting of limited neck mobility) suggesting that better glottic visualization is achieved with videoassisted or fiberoptic devices than with conventional blades.30,72–79 Extraglottic airway devices for supralaryngeal ventilation can be further divided into cuffed, orally inserted hypopharyngeal airways (ie, various forms of LMA) and cuffed orally inserted esophageal airways (esophageal tracheal combitube).80 Of the hypopharyngeal devices for ventilation, the LMA-Fasttrach (LMA North America, Inc; San Diego, CA) appears to be particularly useful for airway management in the ICU due to its unique design, which allows the mask to be used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. This device was recently modified, and is now available with an integrated fiberoptic system and a detachable monitor (LMA Ctrach; LMA North America, Inc), allowing for endotracheal intubation under direct vision without the use of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. In a study of 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways, including patients with Cormack-Lehane grade 4 views, patients with immobilized cervical spines, patients with airways distorted by tumors, surgery, or radiation therapy, and patients wearing stereotactic frames, the insertion of the LMA-Fastrach was accomplished in three or fewer attempts in all patients. The overall success rates for blind and fiberoptically guided intubations through the LMA-Fastrach were 96.5% and 100.0%, respectively.81 When studied in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective surgical procedures, the rate of CHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians


successful tracheal intubation with the LMA-Fastrach was 96.3%.82 Recent data have suggested that the new LMA CTrach system has potential advantages over the LMA-Fastrach and can be very useful in the management of the difficult airway.83,84 When a difficult airway is recognized prior to the administration of induction agents, an awake, FOI may be the best option; however, other modalities of awake intubation are possible (eg, blind oral or nasal intubation, or retrograde techniques). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy may be particularly useful when upper airway anatomy has been distorted by tumors, trauma, endocrinopathies, or congenital anomalies. Furthermore, it is useful in accident victims in whom a question of cervical spine injury exists and the patient’s neck cannot be manipulated. If the airway has to be secured via FOI in an emergent fashion, the use of a topical anesthesia seems preferable to regional nerve blockade.

Rescue Strategies Should initial attempts at endotracheal intubation fail, an alternative strategy for providing ventilation to the patient, and ultimately for securing the airway, must be in place. The implementation of the ASA DAA in the critical care setting is logical and, according to one analysis,6 may have decreased the number of failed airways in the ICU environment. Since this airway algorithm was originally developed as a tool for anesthesia providers in the operating room, some minor adaptations for the ICU setting should be considered (Fig 2). While assessments of the likelihood of successful intubation and the clinical impact of basic management problems remain the same, critically ill patients in respiratory failure will almost certainly have less tolerance for periods of apnea than patients with unanticipated difficult airways in the operating room. The return to spon-

Figure 2. Algorithm for airway management in the ICU. SB ⫽ spontaneous breathing; NMBA ⫽ neuromuscular blocking agent; DMV ⫽ difficult mask ventilation; pt ⫽ patient. 616

Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

taneous ventilation is an important exit strategy for intubation in the operating room during elective surgery. In the ICU, this is often impossible due to mechanical failure and the limited physiologic reserves of the patient. Strategies for airway management in the emergency pathway of the ASA DAA include alternative means to provide ventilation (eg, the LMA-Fasttrach described in the previous section, as well as the Combitube; Tyco-HealthcareKendall USA; Mansfield, MA). The LMA can also be used as an intubation conduit and has been reported as a successful bridge to percutaneous tracheostomy in a case of failed airway in the ICU.85 The Combitube combines the features of an ETT and an esophageal obturator airway, and reduces the risk of aspiration. The use of these devices can be learned easily by personnel who are unskilled in airway management.86 Other devices that are suitable for noninvasive rescue strategies include the gum elastic bougie or an airway exchanger catheter (Cook Critical Care; Bloomington, IN). These devices may be useful in a situation in which the glottis can be only partially visualized and the insertion of the ETT into the trachea is unsuccessful. In a randomized study38 of 60 patients undergoing elective intubation with the application of cricoid pressure, the use of a gum elastic bougie was more effective than a regular stylet to facilitate intubation. Another tool included in the ASA DAA emergency pathway is retrograde endotracheal intubation, which entails passing a wire through the cricothyroid ligament in a cephalad direction until the tip can be retrieved through the nose or the mouth. A hollow guiding catheter is inserted in a cephalad direction over the guidewire, the guidewire is removed, and the ETT is then advanced antegrade over the guiding catheter into the trachea. A commercial kit for the procedure is available (Cook Critical Care). Success rates for the procedure vary. In a review87 of 1,368 patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in the emergency department, the authors found that retrograde endotracheal intubations were attempted in 8 patients, of which only four were successful. Among the complications encountered was the inability to pass the ETT through the vocal cords.87 To overcome this problem, Lenfant and coworkers88 have recently developed a modification of the technique in a human cadaver study. Insertion of the hollow guiding catheter antegrade through the ETT into the trachea prior to removal of the guidewire significantly increased the success rate from 69%, using the classic technique, to 89%, using the modified technique.88 It should be noted, however, that each provider participating in the study had previously performed at least 10 successful procedures in a cadaver, suggesting that this strategy should be

carried out by experienced providers only. Should all alternative and noninvasive strategies to provide ventilation fail, a surgical airway has to be established. The two principal choices are cricothyroidotomy and tracheostomy, either in a percutaneous or open surgical fashion. In a study89 comparing surgical cricothyroidotomy (Portex cuffed device; Smiths Medical Ltd; Hythe, UK) and wire-guided cricothyroidotomy (cuffed and uncuffed version of Melkerset; Cook Critical Care) in an airway mannequin and artificial lung model, the cuffed devices provided more effective ventilation and tidal volumes. Furthermore, the surgical method was found to be quicker than the wire-guided approach (mean time to first breath, 44.3 vs 87.2 s, respectively) but may have a higher failure rate in inexperienced hands.89 Few data are available on the utility of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) for emergency airway access. In a case series90 of nine patients who were in severe respiratory distress, in which intubation by conventional means had been unsuccessful, all nine patients were successfully intubated using the PDT technique. The average time to gain access to the airway in the authors’ institution with this technique is reportedly 2.8 min, if performed by an experienced provider.90 Whenever possible, ventilation should be provided while access to the airway is being established (eg, LMA). While elective PDT in the critical care setting is safe and effective,91 more data are needed to establish its utility in emergency airway management.

Extubation of the Difficult Airway Extubation of the patient with a known difficult airway requires some planning should respiratory failure and the need for reintubation arise. Besides routine extubation criteria, the cuff leak test has been advocated as a tool for predicting postextubation respiratory stridor. However, the data on the utility of this test appear equivocal. While some authors92,93 have suggested that the cuff leak test might be a useful index of clinically significant laryngotracheal narrowing, others94,95 have not been able to confirm this association. In a more recent study using real-time laryngeal ultrasonography, Ding et al96 were able to demonstrate a significant relationship between the air column width during cuff deflation and the development of postextubation stridor. These data have been confirmed by a second recent, prospective randomized trial97 in 128 medical and surgical ICU patients. In this study, a reduced cuff leak volume, defined as ⬍ 24% of tidal volume, was a reliable indicator for identifying patients with a high risk for developing stridor. FurCHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians


thermore, Jaber et al97 were able to show that in patients who are at risk (eg, traumatic intubation, prolonged intubation, or previous accidental intubation) a leak volume of ⬍ 130 mL or 12% of the tidal volume has a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 95% for the development of postextubation stridor. Initially described by Benumof,98 extubating the patient via an airway exchange catheter (AEC) to retain a conduit for possible reintubation has been described by several authors.99,100 In a prospective study101 of 40 patients who had one or more risk factors for difficult reintubation, an AEC allowed for uncomplicated reintubation (n ⫽ 4) without desaturation on the first attempt. This was subsequently confirmed in a prospective, observational study102 in patients who had undergone maxillofacial and major neck surgery, and were considered to be impossible to reintubate by direct laryngoscopy. Reintubation was easily achieved with the AEC up to 18 h after extubation.102 An advantage of this strategy is the ability to insufflate oxygen through the catheter to avoid oxygen desaturation while assessing the patient for evidence of respiratory distress or compromise. Summary Managing the airway of a critically ill patient poses some unique challenges for the intensivist. The combination of a limited physiologic reserve in the patient and the potential for difficult mask ventilation and intubation mandates careful planning with a good working knowledge of alternative tools and strategies, should conventional attempts at securing the airway fail. If difficulty in managing a patient’s airway is anticipated, the use of awake fiberoptic techniques should be strongly considered. Although the use of muscle relaxants may facilitate endotracheal intubation, they must be used with extreme caution, and the clinician must have the requisite skills and alternative equipment to secure the airway if standard direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation cannot be accomplished. Given the potentially high complication rate of endotracheal intubation in an ICU environment, future research should be directed at developing protocols to increase the safety of airway management in the ICU. Finally, providing adequate ventilation to the patient who is experiencing respiratory failure takes precedence over endotracheal intubation in order to avoid adverse outcomes related to profound hypoxemia. References 1 Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, et al. Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1703–1711

2 Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults: a prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:367–376 3 Kollef MH, Legare EJ, Damiano M. Endotracheal tube misplacement: incidence, risk factors, and impact of a quality improvement program. South Med J 1994; 87:248 – 254 4 Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiplecenter study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2355–2361 5 Christie JM, Dethlefsen M, Cane RD. Unplanned endotracheal extubation in the intensive care unit. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:289 –293 6 Mort TC. The incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrest during emergency tracheal intubation: a justification for incorporating the ASA Guidelines in the remote location. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16:508 –516 7 Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K. The incidence and risk factors of difficult mask ventilation. J Anesth 2005; 19:7–11 8 Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1229 – 1236 9 Tse JC, Rimm EB, Hussain A. Predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anesthesia: a prospective blind study. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:254 –258 10 Reynolds SF, Heffner J. Airway management of the critically ill patient: rapid-sequence intubation. Chest 2005; 127: 1397–1412 11 Murphy M, Walls RM. Manual of emergency airway management. Chicago, IL: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000 12 Reed MJ, Dunn MJG, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005; 22:99 –102 13 Benumof J. Conventional (laryngoscopic) orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation (single-lumen tube). St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1996 14 Adnet F, Borron SW, Dumas JL, et al. Study of the “sniffing position” by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:83– 86 15 Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, et al. Randomized study comparing the “sniffing position” with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:836 – 841 16 Mort TC. Preoxygenation in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2672–2675 17 Baillard C, Fosse JP, Sebbane M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:171–177 18 Kasper CL, Deem S. The self-inflating bulb to detect esophageal intubation during emergency airway management. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:898 –902 19 Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19:641– 659 20 Paix AD, Williamson JA, Runciman WB. Crisis management during anaesthesia: difficult intubation. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14:e5 21 Biring MS, Lewis MI, Liu JT, et al. Pulmonary physiologic changes of morbid obesity. Am J Med Sci 1999; 318:293–297 22 Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, et al. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the “sniff” and “ramped” positions. Obes Surg 2004; 14:1171–1175


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

23 Lord SA, Boswell WC, Williams JS, et al. Airway control in trauma patients with cervical spine fractures. Prehospital Disaster Med 1994; 9:44 – 49 24 Norwood S, Myers MB, Butler TJ. The safety of emergency neuromuscular blockade and orotracheal intubation in the acutely injured trauma patient. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179:646 – 652 25 Suderman VS, Crosby ET, Lui A. Elective oral tracheal intubation in cervical spine-injured adults. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38:785–789 26 Talucci RC, Shaikh KA, Schwab CW. Rapid sequence induction with oral endotracheal intubation in the multiply injured patient. Am Surg 1988; 54:185–187 27 Wright SW, Robinson GG Jr, Wright MB. Cervical spine injuries in blunt trauma patients requiring emergent endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:104 –109 28 Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:1293–1318 29 Majernick TG, Bieniek R, Houston JB, et al. Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:417– 420 30 Watts AD, Gelb AW, Bach DB, et al. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1335–1342 31 Donaldson WF III, Heil BV, Donaldson VP, et al. The effect of airway maneuvers on the unstable C1–C2 segment: a cadaver study. Spine 1997; 22:1215–1218 32 Schoenhage KO, Koenig HM. Unanticipated difficult endotracheal intubations in patients with cervical spine instrumentation. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:960 –963 33 McCourt KC, Salmela L, Mirakhur RK, et al. Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:867– 871 34 Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet 1961; 2:404 – 406 35 Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G, et al. Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:60 – 64 36 Salem M, Joseph N, Heyman H, et al. Cricoid compression is effective in obliterating the esophageal lumen in the presence of a nasogastric tube. Anesthesiology 1985; 63: 443– 446 37 Lawes EG, Campbell I, Mercer D. Inflation pressure, gastric insufflation and rapid sequence induction. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:315–318 38 Noguchi T, Koga K, Shiga Y, et al. The gum elastic bougie eases tracheal intubation while applying cricoid pressure compared to a stylet. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50:712–717 39 Haslam N, Parker L, Duggan JE. Effect of cricoid pressure on the view at laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:41– 47 40 Levitan RM, Kinkle WC, Levin WJ, et al. Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upward-rightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47:548 –555 41 Butler J, Sen A. Cricoid pressure in emergency rapid sequence induction. Emerg Med J 2005; 22:815– 816 42 Wadbrook PS. Advances in airway pharmacology: emerging trends and evolving controversy. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2000; 18:767–788 43 Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:622– 628 44 Taha S, Siddik-Sayyid S, Alameddine M, et al. Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle

ants. Can J Anesth 2005; 52:249 –253 45 Lippmann M, Kakazu C. Hemodynamics with propofol: is propofol dangerous in classes III-V patients? Anesth Analg 2006; 103:260 46 Zed PJ, Abu-Laban RB, Harrison DW. Intubating conditions and hemodynamic effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13:378 – 383 47 Allolio B, Dorr H, Stuttmann R, et al. Effect of a single bolus of etomidate upon eight major corticosteroid hormones and plasma ACTH. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1985; 22:281–286 48 de Jong FH, Mallios C, Jansen C, et al. Etomidate suppresses adrenocortical function by inhibition of 11 betahydroxylation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984; 59:1143–1147 49 Wagner RL, White PF, Kan PB, et al. Inhibition of adrenal steroidogenesis by the anesthetic etomidate. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:1415–1421 50 Annane D, Sebille V, Bellissant E. Corticosteroids for patients with septic shock. JAMA 2003; 289:43– 44 51 Roberts RG, Redman JW. Etomidate, adrenal dysfunction and critical care [letter]. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:413 52 Bloomfield R, Noble DW. Etomidate and fatal outcome: even a single bolus dose may be detrimental for some patients. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97:116 –117 53 Hans P, Brichant JF, Hubert B, et al. Influence of induction of anaesthesia on intubating conditions one minute after rocuronium administration: comparison of ketamine and thiopentone. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:276 –279 54 Leykin Y, Pellis T, Lucca M, et al. Intubation conditions following rocuronium: influence of induction agent and priming. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005; 33:462– 468 55 Ledowski T, Wulf H. The influence of fentanyl vs. sketamine on intubating conditions during induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:519 –523 56 Albanese J, Arnaud S, Rey M, et al. Ketamine decreases intracranial pressure and electroencephalographic activity in traumatic brain injury patients during propofol sedation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1328 –1334 57 Martin E, Ramsay G, Mantz J, et al. The role of the ␣2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med 2003; 18:29 – 41 58 Hsu Y-W, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I. Crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:1066 –1076 59 Grant SA, Breslin DS, MacLeod DB, et al. Dexmedetomidine infusion for sedation during fiberoptic intubation: a report of three cases. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16:124 –126 60 Avitsian R, Lin J, Lotto M, et al. Dexmedetomidine and awake fiberoptic intubation for possible cervical spine myelopathy: a clinical series. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2005; 17:97–99 61 Yentis SM. Suxamethonium and hyperkalaemia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1990; 18:92–101 62 Hughes M, Grant IS, Biccard B, et al. Suxamethonium and critical illness polyneuropathy. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27:636 – 638 63 Booij L. Neuromuscular transmission and its pharmacological blockade. Pharm World Sci 1997; 19:13–34 64 Martyn JA, Richtsfeld M. Succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia in acquired pathologic states: etiologic factors and molecular mechanisms. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:158 –169 65 Sluga M, Ummenhofer W, Studer W, et al. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anCHEST / 131 / 2 / FEBRUARY, 2007

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians




68 69 70


72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79

80 81 82 83 84

esthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1356 –1361 Andrews JI, Kumar N, Van Den Brom RHG, et al. A large simple randomized trial of rocuronium versus succinylcholine in rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia along with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43:4 – 8 Mencke T, Knoll H, Schreiber J-U, et al. Rocuronium is not associated with more vocal cord injuries than succinylcholine after rapid-sequence induction: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:943–949 Perry J, Lee J, Wells G. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (database online). Issue 1, 2003 Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, et al. Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:456 – 461 Amour J, Marmion F, Birenbaum A, et al. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:60 – 64 Sethuraman D, Darshane S, Guha A, et al. A randomised, crossover study of the Dorges, McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope blades in a simulated difficult intubation scenario. Anaesthesia 2006; 61:482– 487 Lai HY, Chen IH, Chen A, et al. The use of the GlideScope for tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97:419 – 422 Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, et al. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:381–384 Leung YY, Hung CT, Tan ST. Evaluation of the new Viewmax laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:562–567 MacQuarrie K, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation using Bullard laryngoscope for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anesth 1999; 46:760 –765 Wackett A, Anderson K, Thode H. Bullard laryngoscopy by naive operators in the cervical spine immobilized patient. J Emerg Med 2005; 29:253–257 Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C. The GlideScope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 60 – 64 Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, et al. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52:191–198 Smith CE, Pinchak AB, Sidhu TS, et al. Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1253–1259 Brimacombe J. A proposed classification system for extraglottic airway devices [letter]. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:559 Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, et al. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-tomanage airways. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:1175–1181 Frappier J, Guenoun T, Journois D, et al. Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for the morbidly obese patient. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1510 –1515 Goldman AJ, Rosenblatt WH. Use of the fibreoptic intubating LMA-CTrach in two patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2006; 61:601– 603 Liu EHC, Goy RWL, Chen FG. The LMA CTrachTM, a






90 91

92 93

94 95 96 97

98 99 100 101


new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision: evaluation in 100 patients. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96:396 – 400 Divatia JV, Kulkarni AP, Sindhkar S, et al. Failed intubation in the intensive care unit managed with laryngeal mask airway and percutaneous tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27:409 – 411 Yardy N, Hancox D, Strang T. A comparison of two airway aids for emergency use by unskilled personnel: the Combitube and laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:181–183 Gill M, Madden MJ, Green SM. Retrograde endotracheal intubation: an investigation of indications, complications, and patient outcomes. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:123–126 Lenfant F, Benkhadra M, Trouilloud P, et al. Comparison of two techniques for retrograde tracheal intubation in human fresh cadavers. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:48 –51 Sulaiman L, Tighe SQM, Nelson RA. Surgical vs wireguided cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion. Anaesthesia 2006; 61:565–570 Ault MJ, Ault B, Ng PK. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy for emergent airway access. J Intensive Care Med 2003; 18:222–226 Polderman KH, Spijkstra JJ, de Bree R, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication. Chest 2003; 123:1595–1602 Miller RL, Cole RP. Association between reduced cuff leak volume and postextubation stridor. Chest 1996; 110:1035–1040 Chung Y-H, Chao T-Y, Chiu C-T, et al. The cuff-leak test is a simple tool to verify severe laryngeal edema in patients undergoing long-term mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:409 – 414 Kriner EJ, Shafazand S, Colice GL. The endotracheal tube cuff-leak test as a predictor for postextubation stridor. Respir Care 2005; 50:1632–1638 Engoren M. Evaluation of the cuff-leak test in a cardiac surgery population. Chest 1999; 116:1029 –1031 Ding LW, Wang HC, Wu HD, et al. Laryngeal ultrasound: a useful method in predicting post-extubation stridor; a pilot study. Eur Respir J 2006; 27:384 –389 Jaber S, Chanques G, Matecki S, et al. Post-extubation stridor in intensive care unit patients: risk factors evaluation and importance of the cuff-leak test. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:69 –74 Benumof JL. Additional safety measures when changing endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:921–922 Cooper RM. The use of an endotracheal ventilation catheter in the management of difficult extubations. Can J Anesth 1996; 43:90 –93 Topf AI, Eclavea A. Extubation of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:1213–1214 Loudermilk EP, Hartmannsgruber M, Stoltzfus DP, et al. A prospective study of the safety of tracheal extubation using a pediatric airway exchange catheter for patients with a known difficult airway. Chest 1997; 111:1660 –1665 Dosemeci L, Yilmaz M, Yegin A, et al. The routine use of pediatric airway exchange catheter after extubation of adult patients who have undergone maxillofacial or major neck surgery: a clinical observational study. Crit Care 2004; 8:R385–R390


Postgraduate Education Corner

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians

Airway Management in Critical Illness J. Matthias Walz, Maksim Zayaruzny and Stephen O. Heard Chest 2007;131;608-620 DOI 10.1378/chest.06-2120 This information is current as of March 2, 2007 Updated Information & Services

Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found at:


This article cites 93 articles, 30 of which you can access for free at:

Permissions & Licensing

Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:


Information about ordering reprints can be found online:

Email alerting service

Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article.

Images in PowerPoint format Figures that appear in CHEST articles can be downloaded for teaching purposes in PowerPoint slide format. See any online article figure for directions.

Downloaded from on March 2, 2007 Copyright © 2007 by American College of Chest Physicians