Antibiotic-Dependent Induction of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E ...

2 downloads 0 Views 177KB Size Report
May 19, 2003 - ttgR, in response to several structurally unrelated antibiotics at the ... presence of hydrophobic antibiotics like chloramphenicol and tetracycline.
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Oct. 2003, p. 3067–3072 0066-4804/03/$08.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3067–3072.2003 Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vol. 47, No. 10

Antibiotic-Dependent Induction of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E TtgABC Efflux Pump Is Mediated by the Drug Binding Repressor TtgR Wilson Tera´n, Antonia Felipe, Ana Segura, Antonia Rojas, Juan-Luis Ramos,* and María-Trinidad Gallegos Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Estacio ´n Experimental del Zaidín, Department of Plant Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Granada, Spain Received 19 May 2003/Returned for modification 13 June 2003/Accepted 8 July 2003

Pseudomonas putida is well known for its metabolic capabilities, but recently, it has been shown to exhibit resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. In P. putida DOT-T1E, the TtgABC efflux pump, which has a broad substrate specificity, extrudes antibiotics such as ampicillin, carbenicillin, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, and chloramphenicol. We have analyzed the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump operon and its regulatory gene, ttgR, in response to several structurally unrelated antibiotics at the transcriptional level and investigated the role of the TtgR protein in this process. ttgABC and ttgR are expressed in vivo at a moderate basal level, which increases in the presence of hydrophobic antibiotics like chloramphenicol and tetracycline. In vitro experiments show that, in the absence of inducers, TtgR binds to a palindromic operator site which overlaps both ttgABC and ttgR promoters and dissociates from it in the presence of chloramphenicol and tetracycline. These results suggest that the TtgR repressor is able to bind to structurally different antibiotics, which allows induction of TtgABC multidrug efflux pump expression in response to these antimicrobial agents. This is the first case in which the expression of a drug transporter of the resistance-nodulation-division family has been shown to be regulated directly by antibiotics. the removal of antibiotics from the periplasm or the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (7, 25, 43). RND/MFP/OMFtype multidrug efflux systems have been described in various microorganisms including Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (19, 30, 41, 47). The range and number of agents extruded vary from organism to organism, even for pumps with high degrees of amino acid sequence similarity, promoting resistance to a range of clinically relevant antimicrobials. Expression of the majority of the bacterial drug transporter genes is controlled by transcriptional regulatory proteins, either repressors or activators, that are often located upstream from efflux pump operons (12). Some of them (i.e., BmrR [45, 48], EmrR [5, 20], QacR [39, 40], and TetR [16, 28, 29]) are able to bind to substrates of their cognate multidrug transporters and promote an increase in their expression. The drug-binding properties of these welldescribed bacterial efflux pump regulators have provided new insights into the protein-drug recognition field and, thus, in the design of new and more effective ways to overcome this mechanism of resistance. Strains of the species P. putida are well known for their metabolic capabilities, but recently, their mechanisms of resistance to a wide range of antibiotics and organic solvents have become the object of study (6, 17, 32, 33). In P. putida strain DOT-T1E, three homologous efflux pumps belonging to the RND family of bacterial transporters (TtgABC, TtgDEF, and TtgGHI) are involved in solvent tolerance (6, 24, 35). Although these pumps are 70% identical at the protein level, they exhibit significant differences in substrate specificity, and so TtgABC and TtgGHI extrude antibiotics as well as solvents.

The increasing antibiotic resistance in bacteria is creating a critical situation that may reverse the enormous medical gains experienced with the use of effective antibiotics. Resistance can be caused by diverse mechanisms involving decreased antibiotic accumulation, physical modification or destruction of the antibiotics, and alteration of the enzyme target of these agents. In recent years, a mechanism of resistance involving the active efflux of antibiotics by pumps has been elucidated. These efflux systems are broadly specific and able to accommodate a variety of structurally unrelated antimicrobial agents, such as antibiotics, biocides, dyes, detergents, fatty acids, and organic solvents (18, 26, 27, 30, 33). Efflux systems capable of transporting multiple antimicrobials fall into six classes: the major facilitator superfamily, the ATP-binding cassette family, the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, the small multidrug resistance family (which is itself a member of the drug-metabolite transporter superfamily), the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family, and the multidrug endosomal transporter family (37). The members of the RND family are the most relevant in respect to resistance to clinically important agents (30). Originally thought to be limited to gram-negative bacteria, members of the RND family have now been identified in all major kingdoms (44). In gram-negative microorganisms, RND transporters work in conjunction with a periplasmic membrane fusion protein (MFP) and an outer membrane protein, now called outer membrane factor (OMF) (47), which facilitates

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CSIC-Estacio ´n Experimental del Zaidín, Apdo. de Correos 419, E-18008 Granada, Spain. Phone: 34-958181608. Fax: 34-958135740, E-mail: [email protected]. 3067

3068

´ N ET AL. TERA

Only the TtgABC efflux pump has been shown to be essential for the antibiotic resistance of this strain, as a ttgB-knockout mutant experienced a significant decrease in resistance to an ample variety of antibiotics (6, 32, 35). On the other hand, the ttgGHI operon is expressed at high levels regardless of the growth conditions, and its expression is not increased in response to antibiotics in the culture medium (36). Divergent with respect to these structural genes are the putative regulatory genes: ttgR for ttgABC and an operon, ttgVW, in the case of the ttgGHI genes (6, 35, 36). TtgR and TtgV downregulate the expression of ttgABC (6) and ttgGHI (36), respectively, but the role of the ttgW gene product in the control of expression of ttgGHI remains to be determined. Given that TtgABC has been shown to extrude multiple antibiotics, we decided to analyze the expression of this pump at the transcriptional level in response to the antibiotics that the pump extrudes. We observed that, among the antibiotics tested, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were able to induce the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump and its regulatory gene, ttgR, and showed that TtgR is a drug-binding repressor involved in the antibiotic induction of this multidrug efflux pump. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture medium. The bacterial strain used in this study was P. putida DOT-T1E (31). This strain was routinely grown in liquid Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 30°C (38). Antibiotics were added to the culture medium to reach final concentrations of 20 ␮g/ml for rifampin and 20 ␮g/ml for tetracycline. We constructed fusions of the promoters of the ttgABC and ttgR operons to a promoterless lacZ gene in the low-copy-number (two to four copies per cell) pMP220 vector (42). The ttgR-ttgA intergenic region (300 bp) was amplified by PCR from P. putida DOT-T1E chromosomal DNA, which was isolated as described by Ausubel et al. (4) with primers incorporating EcoRI and PstI restriction sites (primer TTGAEcoRI [5⬘-CCGGAATTCGTGCGGGGAA C-3⬘] and primer TTGAPstI [5⬘-AAAACTGCAGTAATGGAAGAG-3⬘]) to create a fusion of the promoters of the ttgABC operon to ⬘lacZ and with primers TTGREcoRI (5⬘-CCCGGAATTCAAGAGTAATGGA-3⬘) and TTGRPstI (5⬘AAAACTGCAGCGCGTGCGG-3⬘) to create a fusion of the ttgR promoter to ⬘lacZ. PCRs (50 ␮l) were carried out with 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (AmershamPharmacia) and consisted of 1⫻ PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl), 0.2 ␮M each primer, 0.8 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Roche), and about 100 ng of template DNA. Cycling parameters were 2 min of incubation at 96°C, followed by 30 cycles of 96°C for 1 min, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, before finishing with 10 min at 72°C. Upon amplification, DNA was digested with EcoRI and PstI and ligated to EcoRI-PstI-digested pMP220 to produce pED14 (PttgA::lacZ) and pED13 (PttgR::lacZ). Plasmids pED13 and pED14 were sequenced to make sure that no mutations were introduced in the corresponding promoter regions. These plasmids were electroporated in P. putida DOT-T1E as described by Enderle and Farwell (8). Cells in 0.2-cm cuvettes were submitted to a high-voltage pulse (3,000 V) for 5 ms by using a MicroPulser electroporation apparatus (Bio-Rad), and transformants were selected in LB agar plates supplemented with tetracycline. DNA techniques. A Qiaprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen) was used for plasmid isolation. Both strands of the plasmid DNA were sequenced with universal, reverse, or specifically designed primers by using an automatic DNA sequencer (ABI-PRISM 310; Applied Biosystems, Inc.). Primer extension analysis. P. putida DOT-T1E was grown overnight in LB medium. The cells were then diluted 25-fold in fresh medium, and aliquots were incubated in the absence or presence of sublethal concentrations of antibiotics (carbenicillin [120 ␮g/ml], chloramphenicol [30 ␮g/ml], gentamicin [0.25 ␮g/ml], nalidixic acid [30 ␮g/ml], streptomycin [8 ␮g/ml], and tetracycline [1 ␮g/ml]) until the culture reached a turbidity of 1.0 at 660 nm. The cells (30 ml) were pelleted and processed for RNA isolation by the method of Marque´s et al. (22). mRNAs of the ttgABC pump operon and its corresponding regulator were reverse transcribed with avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase and a specific oligonucleotide primer complementary to a sequence located 120 to 150 nucleotides from the transcription start point of each gene (primer TtgA1 [5⬘-GAGC

ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. GGTAACGGCTGGCTTG-3⬘] and primer TtgR1 [5⬘-CTTCTTCTTTGGTTCG ACGGA-3⬘] for ttgABC and ttgR, respectively). As an internal control, the mRNA of the constantly expressed rpoS gene was also reverse transcribed with primer RpoS5 (5⬘-CAGCAATCGACTGCCC-3⬘). Oligonucleotides were end labeled with [␥-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase, and 0.5 to 1 pmol was annealed to 20 ␮g of total RNA for 5 min at 90°C, followed by 5 min at 65°C. cDNA was synthesized by using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (1 h at 44°C) and analyzed in urea-polyacrylamide sequencing gels (4, 22). The relative intensities of the bands were quantified by using a Molecular Imager system (GS525 equipment; Bio-Rad). The results presented here are representative of five independent experiments. ␤-Galactosidase assays. Bacterial cells were inoculated from fresh LB agar plates that had been supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics and in which the bacteria were allowed to grow overnight at 30°C. The cultures were diluted 100-fold in fresh LB medium without or with inducing antibiotics at the same concentrations used for the primer extension experiments and were then incubated at 30°C with shaking until the culture reached a turbidity of 1.0 at 660 nm, and ␤-galactosidase activity was determined as described by Miller (23). Tetracycline was used to maintain the plasmids; thus, tetracycline induction of the lacZ fusions could not be assessed. The results presented here are the means of eight different experiments. Overexpression and purification of TtgR. A 651-bp fragment containing the ttgR gene was amplified from P. putida DOT-T1E chromosomal DNA by PCR with primers TtgR5⬘NdeI (5⬘-NNNNNNCATATGGTCCGTCGAACCAAAG3⬘) and TtgR3⬘XhoI (5⬘-NNNNNNCTCGAGTTTGCGCAGAGCCGGGCTC3⬘), which generated NdeI and XhoI restriction sites, respectively. PCRs were carried out as described above. After digestion with these restriction enzymes, the PCR products were ligated into vector pET29a(⫹) (Novagen), which had previously been digested with NdeI and XhoI. The resulting plasmid, pTGF1, contained the ttgR-coding sequence in frame with a DNA sequence encoding a His6 tag at its 3⬘ end. For TtgR-His6 purification, pTGF1 was transformed into E. coli B834(DE3). The cells were grown in several 1-liter batches at 30°C in 2⫻ YT culture medium (38) with 50 ␮g of kanamycin per ml to an A660 between 0.5 and 0.7 and then induced with 1 mM isopropyl-␤-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were harvested after 3 h of induction at 20°C, resuspended in 25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0)–0.5 M NaCl–5% (vol/vol) glycerol—protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete; Roche), and broken by treatment with 20 ␮g of lysozyme per ml and a French press. Following centrifugation at 20,000 ⫻ g for 30 min, the protein was found to be predominantly (more than 80%) in the soluble fraction. TtgR-His6 was purified by nickel affinity chromatography with a HiTrap chelating Sepharose column (Amersham-Pharmacia) and eluted with an imidazole gradient. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed against TGED (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) to which 50% (vol/ vol) glycerol and 50 mM NaCl were added and stored at ⫺70°C (long-term storage) or ⫺20°C (shorter-term storage). Protein concentrations were determined by using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit. Gel mobility shift assays. The DNA probe was a 189-bp fragment containing the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region obtained from DOT-T1E chromosomal DNA by PCR with the TtgABC1 (5⬘-AACGCTCCGGGGGCACC-3⬘) and TtgABC2 (5⬘-GGGAGACGCTCAAGAG-3⬘) pair of primers. PCRs were carried out as described above; and cycling parameters were 1 min at 96°C, followed by 30 cycles of 96°C for 1 min, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, before finishing with 5 min at 72°C. The PCR product was isolated from an agarose gel by using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen) and was radiolabeled at its 5⬘ ends with [␥-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. The labeled probe (3 nM; ⬃10,000 cpm) was then incubated with 0.75 ␮M purified TtgR-His6 in 10 ␮l of TGED supplemented with 8 mM MgCl2, 20 ␮g of poly(dI-dC) per ml, and 200 ␮g of bovine serum albumin per ml. When present, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were added to the binding reaction mixture at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 mM. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 30°C, and samples were run on 4.5% (wt/vol) native polyacrylamide gels (Mini-Protean II; Bio-Rad) for 2 h at 50 V and room temperature in Tris-glycine buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 200 mM glycine). The results were analyzed by using a Molecular Imager system (GS525 equipment; Bio-Rad). DNase I footprinting assay. The DNA probe was the same 189-bp PCR fragment containing the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region used in the gel mobility shift assays. For the footprint on the top strand, the PCR was carried out with primers TtgABC1 (end labeled with [␥-32P]ATP as described above) and TtgABC2. For the footprint on the bottom strand, the same primers were used, but in this case, TtgABC2 was end labeled. Purified labeled probe (10 nM; ⬃104 cpm) was incubated without or with TtgR-His6 (0.75 ␮M) in 10-␮l reaction mixtures consisting of TGED supplemented with 8 mM MgCl2, 20 ␮g of poly(dI-

VOL. 47, 2003

TOLERANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS

FIG. 1. Effects of different antibiotics on the expression of the ttgABC promoter. P. putida DOT-T1E cultures were grown for 4 h in the absence and presence of different antibiotics at sub-MICs: streptomycin (Sm), 8 ␮g/ml; chloramphenicol (Cm), 30 ␮g/ml; nalidixic acid (Nal), 30 ␮g/ml; tetracycline (Tc), 1 ␮g/ml; carbenicillin (Cb), 120 ␮g/ml; and gentamicin (Gm), 0.25 ␮g/ml. Primer extension analysis of the ttgABC operon and the rpoS gene (an internal control) was carried out as described in Materials and Methods. The quantities of the corresponding cDNA bands are expressed at the bottoms of the gels in arbitrary units (basal level ⫽ 100 U).

dC) per ml, and 200 ␮g of bovine serum albumin per ml. When present, antibiotics (carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline) were added to the reaction mixture at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mM. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at 30°C before being treated with 40 ␮l of DNase I, as described previously (36).

RESULTS Expression of P. putida DOT-T1E TtgABC efflux pump and its regulator, TtgR. We have analyzed the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump operon and the ttgR gene under different conditions by measuring the relative amount of mRNA expressed in P. putida DOT-T1E grown in the absence and in the presence of several structurally unrelated antibiotics, such as carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline, which had previously been reported to be substrates for the TtgABC efflux pump (6). We observed increases in the levels of the ttgABC and the ttgR mRNAs with respect to the basal level in response to chloramphenicol (4-fold) and tetracycline (2.6-fold) but did not observe increases in response to the other antibiotics (see the results for the ttgABC operon in Fig. 1). We determined the expression of rpoS as an internal control to ensure that the differences observed were not due to variability in RNA isolation and/or the primer extension technique. In Pseudomonas spp. rpoS gene expression is unaltered in the exponential phase under different growth conditions (9, 34). The expression from the ttgA and ttgR promoters was also determined by using fusions of the corresponding promoters to lacZ in pED14 (PttgA::lacZ) and pED13 (PttgR::lacZ). The levels of expression of these promoters in the absence of antibiotics were relatively high (40 ⫾ 2 U for the PttgA promoter and 120 ⫾ 10 U for the PttgR promoter), but consistent 2.2- to 2.6-fold increases in the levels of expression of both promoters (105 ⫾ 5 U for the PttgA promoter and 265 ⫾ 15 U for the PttgR promoter) were observed in response to chloramphenicol at 30 ␮g/ml. However, no increase (⬍1.1-fold) at all was observed in response to the other antibiotics (data not shown). Note that

3069

because pED13 and pED14 are derivatives of Tetr plasmid pMP220, it is not feasible to analyze the induction mediated by tetracycline. Therefore, the ␤-galactosidase assays validated the mRNA levels. It is also worth noting that the expression patterns obtained from the ttgR and ttgA promoters were almost identical, which suggests a common mechanism of regulation for both promoters, also consistent with the fact that both promoters fully overlap. TtgABC and TtgR expression are correlated with antibiotic concentration. As chloramphenicol was the best inducer of the expression of the TtgABC pump, we decided to analyze how the antibiotic dose influenced the expression of the pump and the regulatory gene. We assayed the ␤-galactosidase activities from the ttgABC operon and ttgR promoters in wild-type strain DOT-T1E bearing the corresponding promoter fusions on plasmids pED13 and pED14 and grown in the absence and presence of increasing sublethal concentrations of chloramphenicol (6) (Fig. 2). We observed a parallel increase in the levels of expression of both the pump and the regulator with increasing concentrations of chloramphenicol, which suggests that the antibiotic induction is dose dependent and confirms that both operons are regulated in the same way. Therefore, in P. putida DOT-T1E, the expression of ttgABC and its regulatory gene, ttgR, seems to be correlated with cell antibiotic exposure. TtgR binds to the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region and is released in the presence of chloramphenicol and tetracycline. It had been reported previously that the efflux pump operon is negatively regulated by the adjacent ttgR gene product, as the basal level of ttgABC expression exhibited a 6- to 10-fold increase in a ttgR-knockout mutant. In this mutant, the basal level of activity of the ttgR promoter was also much higher than that in the wild-type background (6). According to these observations, we expected that an increase in TtgR expression would inhibit transcription from both the ttgABC and the ttgR promoters. However, we have shown here that the levels of expression of both the efflux pump and TtgR are enhanced by the presence of certain antibiotics (Fig. 1 and 2), which could be achieved only if the effectors that induce transcription from those promoters have a direct effect on TtgR repressor func-

FIG. 2. Effect of chloramphenicol (Cm) concentration on expression of ttgABC and ttgR promoters. The ␤-galactosidase activities of the P. putida DOT-T1E ttgABC promoter (plasmid pED14; white bars) and the ttgR promoter (plasmid pED13; gray bars) in cultures grown until the turbidity at 660 nm was 1 were determined in the absence (⫺) and in the presence of 25, 50, 75, and 100 ␮g/ml of chloramphenicol per ml.

3070

´ N ET AL. TERA

ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER.

FIG. 3. Dissociation of TtgR from its operator in the presence of chloramphenicol (Cm) and tetracycline (Tc). Gel mobility shift experiments were performed as described in Materials and Methods in the absence and presence of chloramphenicol (A) and tetracycline (B) at the indicated concentrations. The reaction mixtures contained 3 nM DNA and 0.75 ␮M TtgR. B, bound DNA; F, free DNA.

tion. This prompted us to purify the protein and to study in vitro the effect of chloramphenicol and tetracycline in TtgR binding to the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region. Gel mobility shift assays were carried out to show that TtgR binds specifically to a DNA fragment from position ⫹91 of ttgR to position ⫹68 of ttgABC, corresponding to the ttgR-ttgABC intergenic region (Fig. 3). It should be noted that only excess unlabeled intergenic competitor DNA and not excess control unspecific DNA was able to partially titrate out TtgR from its target DNA in gel mobility shift binding reactions (data not shown). Moreover, as for the in vivo induction of expression, chloramphenicol and tetracycline were able to show an in vitro effect on the binding of TtgR to the ttgABC-ttgR operator site. Figure 3 shows the dissociation of TtgR from the operator-containing DNA fragment in gel mobility shift experiments when increasing concentrations of either chloramphenicol or tetracycline were added in the binding reaction. This is the first experimental indication that these antibiotics directly promote TtgR dissociation from its operator site. In order to define the operator region within the ttgA-ttgR intergenic region to which TtgR binds, we carried out DNase I footprinting assays in the absence and presence of different antibiotics (Fig. 4). In the absence of inducers, TtgR protected the two strands of a single 36-bp segment within the ttgA-ttgR intergenic region, where an inverted repeat of 12 bp separated by 4 bp that covers the ⫺10 and ⫺35 regions of both the ttgABC and the ttgR promoters seems to be the sequence recognized by TtgR (Fig. 4). This unique position of the TtgRbinding site with respect to both divergent promoter regions is consistent with the coregulation of these promoters observed in vivo. In agreement with the gel mobility shift assays, this protection was lost when chloramphenicol or tetracycline was added to the binding reaction (Fig. 4A), confirming that, in the presence of these antibiotics, TtgR dissociates from its operator site. The addition of several other antibiotics like nalidixic acid, carbenicillin, gentamicin, or streptomycin to the assay did not cause TtgR dissociation (Fig. 4B), even at a high concentration of 3 mM (data not shown). These results are consistent with those of the in vivo experiments, as the antibiotics that did not induce the expression of ttgABC (Fig. 1) also did not affect TtgR binding, in contrast to the results for the antibiotics shown to be inducers. This provides further evidence for the direct involvement of TtgR in the antibiotic-dependent induction of the ttgABC multidrug efflux pump and strongly accounts

FIG. 4. DNase I footprint of the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region. (A) DNase I footprint assays of the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region were carried out as described in Materials and Methods in the absence and presence of TtgR (0.75 ␮M). When present, chloramphenicol (Cm) and tetracycline (Tc) were present at 1.5 mM. The regions protected by TtgR in both the top and the bottom strands are indicated with respect to the ttgABC transcriptional start point. (B) DNase I footprint of the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region (top strand) by TtgR (0.75 ␮M) in the absence and presence of 1.5 mM tetracycline (Tc), nalidixic acid (Nal), gentamicin (Gm), carbenicillin (Cb), or streptomycin (Sm). In panels A and B the numbers to the left of the gels represent base pairs. (C) Nucleotide sequence of the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region. The bases protected from DNase I digestion on each strand are highlighted in gray, and the putative TtgR palindromic recognition site is indicated by the arrows. ttgABC and ttgR ⫹1 (arrowheads), ⫺10, and ⫺35 points are also marked.

for the hydrophobic antibiotic specificity of the TtgR repressor. Similar to QacR (10, 40), TtgR seems to possess a multidrugbinding site able to accommodate two very structurally different drugs like chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Moreover, the TtgABC efflux pump was shown to extrude organic solvents like toluene and styrene as well as antibiotics (35). Also, TtgABC expression is induced by the presence of styrene or 1-naphthol (W. Tera´n, J. L. Ramos, and M. T. Gallegos, unpublished data), which suggests that TtgR is also probably involved in organic solvent binding.

VOL. 47, 2003

TOLERANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS

DISCUSSION This paper provides the first experimental evidence to demonstrate that the antibiotic-dependent induction of the P. pu tida DOT-T1E multidrug efflux pump TtgABC and its regulatory gene, ttgR, is controlled by the repressor protein TtgR. This is the first case in which the expression of an RND drug transporter has been shown to be regulated directly by antibiotics via its local regulator. Other RND transporters regulated by diverse drugs have been described, but in these cases the regulation involved one of the so-called global stress regulators, MarA, Rob, or SoxS (1, 2, 21, 46). Addition of the structurally dissimilar antibiotics chloramphenicol and tetracycline, which are also substrates of the TtgABC transporter, has been demonstrated to result in derepression of the ttgABC and ttgR promoters in vivo (Fig. 1 and 2). By both in vitro gel mobility shift (Fig. 3) and DNase I protection (Fig. 4) experiments, we have identified the operator site for TtgR in the ttgABC-ttgR intergenic region and have shown that TtgR is released from its operator DNA site by binding to chloramphenicol and tetracycline. TtgR is a member of the TetR family of transcriptional regulators (3), all of which share a highly homologous Nterminal DNA-binding domain of ⬃45 residues. The structures of TetR and QacR have revealed that this region forms a three-helix bundle that contains a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif (16, 29, 40). These conserved DNA-binding domains are connected to diverse ligand-binding domains in the TetR family of proteins (3). Within the TetR family members, there are proteins which bind to ⬃15-bp operator sites, like TetR (16, 29), and others, like QacR, which bind to an unusually long (36-bp) operator consisting of 15-bp half sites separated by a 6-bp spacer region (10). TtgR binds to an imperfect inverted repeat operator sequence which overlaps the ttgABC and ttgR promoters (Fig. 4C); in fact, the ⫺10 and ⫺35 regions of the ttgABC promoter and the ⫺10 region of the ttgR promoter are protected (Fig. 4). This operator site is also large (36 bp), comprising 12-bp half sites separated by 4 bp, which suggests that each half site would probably receive one dimer of TtgR, as reported for QacR (11, 40) and in accordance with the limited 6-bp DNA recognition capacity described for an HTH motif (14). The binding of TtgR to its operator prevents transcription from the ttgABC and ttgR operons, probably by blocking RNA polymerase access to the promoters. Most other members of the family of regulatory proteins that share homology with TtgR and that are divergently transcribed with respect to the operons that they control appear to regulate the expression of their own genes, such as TetR (15); CamR, a repressor of D-camphor degradation in P. putida (3); and TcmR, the repressor of the Streptomyces glaucescens tetracenomycin C resistance gene, tcmA (13). The repression of ttgABC and ttgR transcription by TtgR was able to be overcome by the addition of the structurally dissimilar antibiotics chloramphenicol and tetracycline, resulting in the induction of ttgABC and ttgR expression (Fig. 1 and 2). Gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 3) suggested that for these two antibiotics, induction of ttgABC and ttgR expression involved the direct interaction of TtgR with the substrates. Direct recognition of structurally dissimilar compounds rather than the involvement of a secondary messenger has also been shown for a

3071

limited number of multidrug pump regulators like QacR (10) and BmrR (45, 48) and probably appears to be a more general feature in bacterial multidrug transporter regulation. Why do these antibiotics induce the efflux pump genes while other antibiotic substrates of TtgABC fail to do so? Chloramphenicol and tetracycline probably resemble the natural effectors of the regulatory protein or the natural substrates of the efflux pump. On the other hand, Duque et al. (6) showed that the levels of expression in the wild-type strain never reached the ones observed in the ttgR null mutant, even in the presence of effectors, which suggests that, in strain DOT-T1E, ttgABC expression is always repressed in such a way that it never achieves the maximum level of expression or at least never achieves the levels reached in the TtgR mutant background. Because of the overlapping nature of the ttgABC and ttgR promoters, TtgR adjusts its own levels of expression in response to the different concentrations of effectors (Fig. 2). Therefore, TtgR seems to be constantly downregulating the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump operon promoter and, in doing so, prevents the overexpression of the pump under any conditions which could be harmful for the cell. This modulating role is similar to the one proposed for the AcrR repressor of the AcrAB pump of E. coli (21). Thus, TtgR functions as a multidrug-binding regulator that specifically modulates the expression of the ttgABC efflux pump in response to the presence of effectors. Future work on the ttgABC-ttgR system should reveal more intimate details of the molecular interactions between the regulator with its effectors and its target DNA. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by grants QLRT-2001-00435 and BIO4CT97-2270 from the European Commision to J.-L.R. and grant RGY0021/2002 from the Human Frontier Science Programme to M.T.G. We thank E. Duque for the gift of pED13 and pED14, Ana Hurtado for DNA sequencing, and Carmen Lorente for improving the language of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Alekshun, M. N., and S. B. Levy. 1997. Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2067–2075. 2. Aono, R., N. Tsukagoshi, and M. Yamamoto. 1998. Involvement of outer membrane protein TolC, a possible member of the mar-sox regulon, in maintenance and improvement of organic solvent tolerance of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 180:938–944. 3. Arakami, H., N. Yagi, and M. Suzuki. 1995. Residues important for the function of a multihelical DNA binding domain in the new transcription factor family of Cam and Tet repressors. Protein Eng. 8:1259–1266. 4. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. F. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1991. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associated, New York, N.Y. 5. Brooun, A., J. J. Tomashek, and K. Lewis. 1999. Purification and ligand binding of EmrR, a regulator of a multidrug transporter. J. Bacteriol. 181: 5131–5133. 6. Duque, E., A. Segura, G. Mosqueda, and J. L. Ramos. 2001. Global and cognate regulators control the expression of the organic solvent efflux pumps TtgABC and TtgDEF of Pseudomonas putida. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1100– 1106. 7. Elkins, C. A., and H. Nikaido. 2002. Substrate specificity of the RND-type multidrug efflux pump AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli is determined predominantly by two large periplasmic loops. J. Bacteriol. 184:6490–6498. 8. Enderle, P. J., and M. A. Farwell. 1998. Electroporation of freshly plated Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells. BioTechniques 25:954– 956. 9. Fujita, M., K. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, and A. Amemura. 1994. Transcription of the principal sigma-factor genes, rpoD and rpoS, in Pseudomonas aerugi-

3072

10. 11. 12. 13.

14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.

23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.

29. 30.

´ N ET AL. TERA

nosa is controlled according to the growth phase. Mol. Microbiol. 13:1071– 1077. Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, N. J. Roberts, I. T. Paulsen, and R. A. Skurray. 1998. QacR is a repressor protein that regulates expression of the Staphylococcus aureus multidrug efflux pump QacA. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18665–18673. Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, M. A. Schumacher, R. G. Brennan, and R. A. Skurray. 2001. The staphylococcal QacR multidrug regulator binds a correctly spaced operator as a pair of dimers. J. Bacteriol. 183:7102–7109. Grkovic, S., M. H. Brown, and R. A. Skurray. 2002. Regulation of bacterial drug export systems. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:671–701. Guilfoile, P. G., and C. R. Hutchinson. 1992. The Streptomyces glaucescens TcmR protein represses transcription of the divergently oriented tcmR and tcmA genes by binding to an intergenic operator region. J. Bacteriol. 174: 3659–3666. Harrison, S. C., and A. K. Aggarwal. 1990. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:933–969. Hillen, W., and C. Berens. 1994. Mechanisms underlying expression of Tn10 encoded tetracycline resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48:345–369. Hinrichs, W., C. Kisker, M. Duvel, A. Muller, K. Tovar, W. Hillen, and W. Saenger. 1994. Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance. Science 264:418–420. Kieboom, J., J. J. Dennis, J. A. de Bont, and G. J. Zylstra. 1998. Identification and molecular characterization of an efflux pump involved in Pseudomonas putida S12 solvent tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 273:85–91. Kieboom, J., and J. de Bont. 2001. Identification and molecular characterization of an efflux system involved in Pseudomonas putida S12 multidrug resistance. Microbiology 147:43–51. Lin, J., L. O. Michel, and Q. Zhang. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2124–2131. Lomovskaya, O., K. Lewis, and A. Matin. 1995. EmrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump EmrAB. J. Bacteriol. 177:2328–2334. Ma, D., M. Alberti, C. Lynch, H. Nikaido, and J. E. Hearst. 1996. The local repressor AcrR plays a modulating role in the regulation of acrAB genes of Escherichia coli by global stress signals. Mol. Microbiol. 19:101–112. Marque´s, S., J. L. Ramos, and K. N. Timmis. 1993. Analysis of the mRNA structure of the Pseudomonas putida TOL meta fission pathway operon around the transcription initiation point, the xylTE and the xylFJ regions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216:227–236. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 352–355. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Mosqueda, G., and J. L. Ramos. 2000. A set of genes encoding a second toluene efflux system in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E is linked to the tod genes for toluene metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 182:937–943. Murakami, S., R. Nakashima, E. Yamashita, and A. Yamaguchi. 2002. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 419:587– 593. Nikaido, H. 1996. Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178:5853–5859. Nikaido, H., and H. I. Zgurskaya. 2001. AcrAB and related multidrug efflux pumps of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:215–218. Orth, P., D. Schnappinger, P. E. Sum, G. A. Ellestad, W. Hillen, W. Saenger, and W. Hinrichs. 1999. Crystal structure of the tet repressor in complex with a novel tetracycline, 9-(N,N-dimethylglycylamido)-6-demethyl-6-deoxy-tetracycline. J. Mol. Biol. 285:455–461. Orth, P., D. Schnappinger, W. Hillen, W. Saenger, and W. Hinrichs. 2000. Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:215–219. Poole, K. 2001. Multidrug efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance in

ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER.

31.

32. 33. 34. 35.

36.

37. 38. 39. 40. 41.

42. 43. 44.

45.

46. 47. 48.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:255–264. Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, M. J. Huertas, and A. Haidour. 1995. Isolation and expansion of the catabolic potential of a Pseudomonas putida strain able to grow in the presence of high concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Bacteriol. 177:3911–3916. Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, P. Godoy, and A. Segura. 1998. Efflux pumps involved in toluene tolerance in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E. J. Bacteriol. 180:3323–3329. Ramos, J. L., E. Duque, M. T. Gallegos, P. Godoy, M. I. Ramos-Gonza ´lez, A. Rojas, W. Tera ´n, and A. Segura. 2002. Mechanisms of solvent tolerance in gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:743–768. Ramos-Gonzalez, M. I., and S. Molin. 1998. Cloning, sequencing, and phenotypic characterization of the rpoS gene from Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Bacteriol. 180:3421–3431. Rojas, A., E. Duque, G. Mosqueda, G. Golden, A. Hurtado, J. L. Ramos, and A. Segura. 2001. Three efflux pumps are required to provide efficient tolerance to toluene in Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E. J. Bacteriol. 183:3967– 3973. Rojas A., A. Segura, M. E. Guazzaroni, W. Tera ´n, A. Hurtado, M. T. Gallegos and J. L. Ramos. 2003. In vivo and in vitro evidence shows that TtgV is the local specific regulator of the TtgGHI multidrug and solvent efflux pump of Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol. 185:4755–4763. Saier, M. H., Jr., and I. T. Paulsen. 2001. Phylogeny of multidrug transporters. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 12:205–213. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Schumacher, M. A., M. C. Miller, S. Grkovic, M. H. Brown, R. A. Skurray, and R. G. Brennan. 2001. Structural mechanisms of QacR induction and multidrug recognition. Science 294:2158–2163. Schumacher, M. A., M. C. Miller, S. Grkovic, M. H. Brown, R. A. Skurray, and R. G. Brennan. 2002. Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug-binding protein QacR. EMBO J. 21:1210–1218. Shafer, W., W. L. Veal, E. H. Lee, L. Zarantonelli, J. T. Balthazar, and C. Rouquette. 2001. Genetic organization and regulation of antimicrobial efflux systems possessed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:219–224. Spaink, H. P., R. J. H. Okker, C. A. Wijffelman, E. Pees, and B. J. J. Lugtenberg. 1987. Promoters in the nodulation region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum Sym plasmid pRL1JI. Plant Mol. Biol. 9:27–39. Tikhonova, E. B., Q. Wang, and H. I. Zgurskaya. 2002. Chimeric analysis of the multicomponent multidrug efflux transporters from gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 184:6499–6507. Tseng, T. T., K. S. Gratwick, J. Kollman, D. Park, D. H. Nies, A. Goffeau, and M. H. Saier. 1999. The RND permease superfamily: an ancient, ubiquitous and diverse family that includes human disease and development proteins. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1:107–125. Vazquez-Laslop, N., P. N. Markham, and A. A. Neyfakh. 1999. Mechanism of ligand recognition by BmrR, the multidrug-responding transcriptional regulator: mutational analysis of the ligand-binding site. Biochemistry 38:16925–16931. White, D. G., J. D. Goldman, B. Demple, and S. B. Levy. 1997. Role of the acrAB locus in organic solvent tolerance mediated by expression of marA, soxS, or robA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:6122–6126. Zgurskaya, H. I., and H. Nikaido. 2000. Multidrug resistance mechanisms: drug efflux across two membranes. Mol. Microbiol. 37:219–225. Zheleznova, E. E., and R. G. Brennan. 2001. Crystal structure of the transcription activator BmrR bound to DNA and a drug. Nature 409:378–382.