The friction drag is obtained from tile two- dimensional airfoil tables as a function of lift coefficient for the appropriate section camber, thickness .... condition on the blade and nacelle surfaces can be mathematically written as: _.,_ = 0. (7). Where ... K=KMAX of block. N (which is also the boundary. K=I for block N+I) would be.
w,
NASA Technical AIAA-90-0028
Memorandum
102428
Application of an Efficient Hybrid Scheme for Aeroelastic Analysis of Advanced Propellers
R. Srivastava Georgia Atlanta,
and N.L.
Institute Georgia
T.S.R. Reddy The University Toledo, Ohio
Sankar
of Technology
of Toledo
and D.L. Huff Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio
Prepared for the 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting .--_:L___:±_:-__; sponsored by the American !nstitute Reno, Nevada, January 8-11, 1990
of Aeronautics
and Astronautics
(NASA-TN-102_28) APPLICATION C)F AN EFFICI_T HYBRID SCHEME F'3R AF_ROELASTIC ANALYSIS _F AnVANCED PROPELLERS (NASA) 30
p
CSCL
N90-13355
OIA G3/O2
UncIas 0252021
_
Im
Application
of an Efficient
Hybrid
Scheme
for Aeroelastic
R. Srivastava* Georgia
and
Institute
N.L.
Analysis
of Advanced
Propellers
Sankar*
of Technology
Atlanta,
Georgia
T.S.R.Reddyt The
University Toledo,
of Toledo Ohio
and D.L. National
Hufftt
Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland,
Ohio
Abstract
An tions
efficient
three-dimensional
to analyze
advanced
explicitly
and
compared
to a fully
memory The and
calculated
on
performance
tNASA tfMember
power
coefficients
ratios
AIAA Resident AIAA.
showed
power
agreement
to centrifugal
*Member
directions scheme.
of elemental good
due
two
The
implicit
advance
showed the
other
propellers.
scheme
is applied
for solving
scheme
treats
spanwise
implicitly, This
leads
the
without
affecting
to a reduction
Euler
equa-
direction
semi
the
accuracy,
in computer
time
as and
requirement.
various
tribution
the
hybrid
with of the
and
and
aero
for two advanced good
coefficient
correlation and
experiment. advanced loading
steady
should
with pressure
A study propellers
propellers,
be included
and
SRTL,
experiment.
Spanwise
dis-
coefficient
differences
:.]se
of the effect showed
SR3
that
of structural structural
for better
fle.,dbi[i_y deformation
correlation.
AHS.
Research
Associate
at Lewis
Research
Center;
member
AIAA
and AHS.
Introduction
It has fered
been
known
by propellers.
number
However
increases
losses
(due
beyond
to wave
of commercial
propellers,
also known
the
upto
Mach
The
propfans
high
efficiency
is accomplished
the
and
are
designed
hence
must
strong
and
classical
bending
and blades
could
be obtained
through
pressure
techniques
the
propulsive
speed
advanced
efficiency
at
cruise
techniques.
extending
and
using
thinner
airfoils,
on the
low aspect
ratio
blades
dictates
twist
are
and
a large
used.
This,
high disk loading.
number
However,
the
to the fact
effect
these
numerical
flow details
near
tests
of blades special
problems
per
features
range
known.
techniques can easily
field. 2
the
hence
are
a
observed
a
loading. the
flow
to obtain
the
is required. At the
propfans
and
cheaper
at any
point
These
design
definitely
efficiency
be obtained
and
exists
propfan,
blade
a need
it is easier
also
in order
techniques.
propulsive
there
of blade
Also,
Therefore,
high
and
thin
As concluded
They
with
on the
or numerical
tips,
are
oscillations.
associated
distribution
the
blades.
for a wide
blades
of a propfan,
between
expensive.
these
amplitude
to be accurately
very
that
swept
tunnel
flutter
of potentially
and
thus
This
highly
wind
experimental
With
losses,
numbers.
or large
of pressure
are
development
distribution,
Mach
Mach
integrity.
also
or. cascade
have
prediction
numerical
cruise
cruise
to high blade
due
flutter
alleviate
an accurate
the
propulsive
higher
further
are
unstalled
loads,
support
high
is of-
compressibility
to improve
compressibility
backwards
leads
arises
[2], through
coupling
on the
experimental
as the
to high
designed
high
efficiency
problems.
They
- torsion
the
structural
classical
Kaza
To understand phenomena
number,
problems
flexible.
aerodynamic
blade
disk loading
to new
to transonic
by Mehmed
lead
Newly
a very
In addition
maintain
critical
moderately
succeptible
blade.
of high
lead
One of the
rapidly
is underway
to relatively
the
with high tip Mach
propfans
to delay
of a propeller
combined
of the
propulsive
off very numbers
aircraft. show
best
0.8 [1].
of the
which
the
drops
an effort
as propfans,
section
propeller,
that
tip Mach
military
by sweeping
requirement
now
efficiency
Currently
outboard
The
time
0.5, as high
drag).
_ efficiency
speeds
for some
stage
e:dsts
to
through to obtain in the
flow
The e._istingnumerical methodsvary in comple_ty from simple Goldstein type strip analysis to analysesthat solve the Euler and Navier - Stokesequations. The strip theory basedon Goldstein'swork [3], assumesthe flow to be inviscid and incompressible(henceirrotational). The propeller is modeledby a lifting line vortex and the wakeis assumedto be composedof a rigid helical vortex sheet. In this analysis the propeller is restricted to having straight blades and no provision can be made for the nacelle_sincethe vortex wakeextendsto the a_s. Sullivan [4] has improved on this method by using the curved lifting line conceptto accountfor the sweep.In this approachthe vortex wakeis representedby a finite number of vortex filamen:sin place of tile continuoussheetof vorticity as usedin Goldstein's approach. The analysis has beenfurther extendedin reference[51by placing the vortex filaments along the stream surfacesso that Hanson
[6] and
blade.
They
blade
pressure
is obtained
Williams
numerically
the appropriate three-dimen_ional
Jou
converged that not
lead
potential
as the
Euler
finite
solved
the full
volume
flow effects
Navier
reviewed
a Mach
number
is obtained methods
nacelle. to a pr0pfan
angle The
due
friction
adjusted
drag
the
so far
operates
for
for sweep
by determining
propeller
to th e
of lift coefficient
mentioned
are
and
kinetic
based
at or near
on
transonic
important. approach
present
equation.
for upwash
as a function
numbers
were
approach
tables
The
Mach
function
representation.
advanced
equation.
by tile potential
equations
The
may become
for free stream
[10] and
sional
been
full
drag
a:dsymmetric
load
and
induced
of the
equation
the
airfoil
shape
Kernel
integral
far wake.
to non-unique
Chausee
have
the
rotational
be modelled
at times,
applied
solutions
strong
The
However,
using
the
thickness
flow nonlinearities
[8] has
of propfans
camber,
of the
analyses.
tip Mach number,
a linear
dimensional
effects.
energy-per-unit-length
to the
by discretizing
tile twosection
conform
i7] applied
solve
distribution
from
linearized
they
of Jameson
formulation
was
greater near
than
the
In addition
'.9! for not 0.6.
leading the
the
able
analysis
to provide
It was concluded edge,
potential
which
could
flow equations
solutions.
Whitfield to the - Stokes
in reference
et aI. propfan
[11] have geometry.
equations I13], with
around regards 3
applied
the
Matsuo a propfan.
unsteady, et aI. Some
to performance
three
dimen-
[12] have
recently
of these
methods
prediction.
All the been
analyses
mentioned
for axisymmetric
axisymmetric. free
analysis climb
or cross in the
and
propfan
being
primary
unsteady should
be able
to solve
condition,
tory
motion
The
blade
by grid
forcing
to be cast
blade.
A Cartesian
forces
do not appear
order
governing
accurate
central for the
Alternating
Direction
geometry
be at least the
other
explicitly,
of the an order
temporal Implicit propfan
the
and
of magnitude
other
This two
directions
the
as gusts
could
result of the
of the aircraft,
a method
body any
to solve
solution
method
and
blade
fitted
time free
vibra-
grid
is used.
dependent
blade
response
It also allows
the
to simulate
only for a rotating
equations,
due governing
a rotating
as the blade
to
Coriolis
but
also for
using
second
motion. form
are
derivatives
discretized and
a first
a set of algebraic
is used
spanwise
allows
such
unsteady
yet be able
to obtain
larger
function,
not
scheme
the
unsteady
in non-axisymmetric
governing
for the spatial
(ADI)
a propfan
blade.
conservative
derivative,
to the
performance
The
the
arbitrary
is not
including
winds
The
forced
and
is true
in fully
differencing
two directions. and
This
dependent
equations
differencing
The
simplifies
system
A true
for the safety
allowing
for a flexible
grid
cross
a propfan.
of both
coordinates,
time
The
a versatile
motion,
in Cartesian
of attack
conditions
is to develop
around
objective,
function
flow
analysis.
forcing
calculation
explicitly.
undergoing
The
the
the
configurations,
fuselage.
research
dependent
is simulated
dependent
a blade
time
et al. [11] have
flow.
off design
flow field around
motion
any
equations
unsteady
permit
in the
flowfield
this
will
of the
in all flight
of the
present
To accomplish
This
time
wake
etc.
motion.
propfan
them
to predict
undergoing
nature
wake may be very critical
of the
the
is at an angle
in atmosphere.
to include
equations
nacelle
also encounter
to the
or fuselage
objective
Euler
may
disturbances
be possible
configuration,
the
of the
of Whitfield
in flight
axisymmetric
propfan
exposed
due to gusts
The
conditions
the
to the
the exception
a propfan
the analysis
The
due
it should
flight
permit
winds
propfan
destroys
descent.
For
for cruise
which
would and
flows.
Even
stream,
so far, with
load
to solve
the
distribution
direction
radial
direction
fluxes
without
The
equations.
permits
spanwise
upwind
equations.
algebraic
in the
implicitly,
order
the
grid
as compared to be treated
affecting
the
to to
semi
accuracy
significantly
as compared
explicitly
requires
to three
inversions
memory
requirement
given
time,
leading
scheme
more
for
include
structural
implicit
needs
scheme.
Treating
of block
tridiagonal
scheme, levels
to be only
per
time
of information
time
and
one
It also
needs
reduces
use of such
requirement
semi-
as opposed
to be stored
The
memory
direction
matrix,
step.
two dimensional.
in computer
The
of the
advanced
due
the effects
governing
by results
for future
present
to centrifugal
and
discussion.
aeroelastic
are
1) to apply
2) to calculate
of structural
equations and
paper
propellers,
deformation,
4) to study
first, followed
inversions
as only two time
objectives
to analyze
propellers.
implicit
the
at any a hybrid
makes
the
efficient.
scheme
be helpful
a fully
to reduction
specific
analysis,
two costly
one of which
scheme
The
only
to a fully
and
flmdbility
steady
methods
hybrid
performance,
3) to
nero loading
in the
on the performance
the numerical The
stead},
an efficient
solution
method
developed
here
of advanced are described are expected
to
research.
Formulation
Aerodynamic
Model:
The Euler equations,
in conservation
form and in Cartesian
+ where nonlinear partial
¢t is the
vector
flux vectors derivative
containing which
of the
+
vector.
In the
can be written
as:
(1)
+ (6), = o
conserved
are functions
coordinates,
flow of the
above
properties,
vector
_. The
t_, F and G subscripts
are
denote
the the
equation
[
P
p_
pu 2 + P
pu
\
pv
puv
pw
puw
+ P)
e
(2) 5
.
pv
pw
fluv
flu w
pv 2 + p
flvw
pw _ + P
flvw
_(e+ p)
v(e + p)
where
p is the fluid
velocity,
e is the
pressure
and
density,
total
may
u, v, w are
energy
the
of the fluid
be expressed
using
inertia]
Cartesian
per unit
the
volume
equation
1
components and
of state
p is the
of the
flow
hydrodynamic
for perfect
gas as:
2
(3)
p = (_ - 1)[_- _p(_ + _ + _)1
where that shock)
7 is the
ratio
of specific
it ensures
the
conservation
in the
In order equations
The
coordinates
with
the
The
advantage
of physical
of using
flux properties
the
across
conservation
form
discontinuities
need
flow past
to be transformed
of the
coordinates
an arbitrary
generalized
in the
and
system,
physical
geometry recast have
domain
=
(e.g.
undergoing
in a generalized the
following
of interest
arbitrary
motion,
coordinate
system.
one to one relationship
:
_(_:,y,z,t)
= _(_,y,z,t) 7"
These
is
flow [14]. to analyze
these
heats.
coordinates
can be rewritten
as:
are
=
non orthogona]
(4)
t
and
completely
general.
The
equation
(1)
q._ + E_ + F n + G_
(5)
= 0
where
pU
p pu q
_
E
pv
J--1
=
d--1
pw e
k
puU
+ _p
pvU
+ _vp
pwU
+ Gp
(e + V)V- _,p
J
(6) pW
pV
F
=
J--I
pull
+ _7=P
pvV
+ _yp
pwV
+ 7hp
_
etc.
are
Initial
the
and
A large tions.
W are the metrics
unique
conditions The
number
of problems
proper
intelligent For these
guess
problem.
and
pwW
+ Gp
J is the jacobian
of the
Hence
using
correct
may be critical initial
the
free
by the
of the boundary
as the
conditions
calculations
velocities,
can be described
application
is as important initial
+ GP
and
(x, _7_, (x
of transformation.
Conditions
to any given
pvW
(_ + v)w - _,v
contravariant
Boundary
It is the
+ _p
J--1
(_+ p)V - n,p U, V, and
puW
conditions stream
condition
proper
7
that
makes
the
meaningful
equasolution
boundary
equations.
to convergence
conditions
set of governing
and physically
governing
could
same
help
of the numerical
in achieving
are used
scheme.
convergence
as the initial
An
faster.
condition.
In the present after
analysis
the governing
boundary
conditions
The
and
blade
on a solid
nacelle
have been
need
to be addressed:
- surface
there
surface
be ignored
equations
nacelle
Physically,
surfaces
solved
boundary
go to zero.
Euler
The
equations.
can be mathematically
the
_
the
surface.
can
be given
is the velocity
The
velocity
vector
vector
same solid
the
acteristic
of the must
should
is operating free air.
propagate be
allowed
state
to infinity.
On
to escape
hence
boundary,
all quantities
are fixed
upstream
while
and
7/is
the
unit
(x, y, z) in the
should the
all characteristics
in a supersonic escape, pressure should
air,
For steady
e are fixed
inside
surface
in free
pu, pv, pw and
acteristics
on the blade
and
(7)
+ (v- y.)) +
variables
travel
condition
of no slip can
vector
blade
normal
to
fixed coordinate
- z,)k
(8)
:
propfan
as that surface
condition
the velocity
as
conditions
Since
hence
as:
any point
= Far-field
The following
= 0
at the
_,at
surface,
boundary
boundary
written
flow field.
explicitly
:
or on a solid
physical
Thus
are updated
for the interior
condition
_.,_
Where
at the boundaries
can be no flow through
must
for the
the flow variables
thus
to that flow.
the
is fixed escape,
at the
to that hence
far field
conditions
calculations the
subsonic
inflow
value.
of the
flee
stream,as
subsonic
outflow
of the
8
and
:he
be the from
remaining
For a supersonic
inflow
distur:_ances boundary,
flee stream.
For supe-sonic
are extrapolated
the
one char-
cannot four
p, pu, pv, pw are ext-apolated
all quantities
flow domain.
boundary,
p is extrapolated
quantities
should
all disturbances
flee stream
At the
four
the
charfrom
outflow,
f:om inside
the
The
block
interface
It is neither one
blade
efficient
passage
computation. solid
would
Across
that
the
nor practical
these
and
periodicity
properties
at K=2 an
and
Therefore,
in order
be solved.
This
block interior
points
the nodes (lb),
to obtain
have
been
refer
to the
the average
of flow quantities
Solution The
latest
the
N (which
boundaries
the
available
values
adjoining
the
the
fluid
of fluid
time
does
whole
not
propfan
exist. should
biock one time step, explicitly,
the
Referring
quantities
for
N and
block K=2
one
after
flow variables
blocks. the
K=I
of block given
(la),
as the average
by averaging
boundary
at any
flow
will require
in figure
updated
block)
at K=KMAX-1
condition,
An axisymmetric
boundaries
are
corresponding
is also
these
of each
the
on
flow field.
solution
from
except
Periodicity
a case,
is done
for
the from
to figure
at boundary N+I)
would
be
of block
N+I.
In
are used.
Procedure:
descretized
hybrid
scheme,
factorized as far
again
on
hence,
boundaries
boundary
solved.
for such
the
updated.This
of block
so the
the solution
The
are updated
periodicity
time,
be continuous,
As shown
for a symmetric
side of the boundary
subscripts
must
boundaries.
K=KMAX
by advancing
K=KMAX
doing
and
the
In this case
on each
(the
flow,
interface
same
additional
of the blade.
fluid properties.
K=KMAX-1
is done
at a time.
same
at the
introduces
all the variables
fluid
K=I
unsymmetric
This
on the type of flow being
have
at the boundaries
all the blades
downstream
on the
properties
For
boundaries
depends
two boundaries
to solve
at a time.
boundaries
boundaries,
require
:
is handled
boundaries
for these
boundary
and
as coding
opposed Time
to the
forms
of the governing
described solved
in next
using
the
is concerned. explicit
integration
equations
section. ADI
The
scheme.
However
described
earlier,
algebraic
equations
An implicit
method
it allows
larger
time
are solved are
a
approximately
is more steps
using
demanding
to be taken
as
schemes. is carried
out
using
the
first order
q_+1 = qn + ArCgq _+1 Or
accurate
Euter
implicit
rule
(9)
where are
the
superscript
known,
and
n denotes
n + 1 the
order
accurate
scheme,
small
time
is required
step
Substituting
the
the
next
current
time
level,
at which
or unknown
time
level.
Even
satisfactory
time
to maintain
Eu!er
equations
accuracy
flow variables
though
is obtained
numerical
the
this
because
is a first
a relatively
stability.
(5) in (9) we get
q_+_ = qn _ Ar (E_ + F, 7 + GC) _+_ The accurate The
treated
This
derivatives
central
differences.
hybrid
In order
The
partial
implicitly
method
the while
77 derivative
two implicit
the
Beam
the
rt direction,
computational the
only
directions.
and
Warming solving
after
using
the
standard
second
Equation
(10)
the
77 marching
the
available
and
latest inversions
Chausee Using
equations
[15] first this
order
= n,_ _ Ar direction
between
rt
this the
at a time. any
-
"_n+l
"-iS-l,k
2A_7
10
flow
tridiagonal hybrid solver
The
dependency
variables. matrix,
scheme marches
marching on the
in with
along
direction marching
as :
(E_ +1 + F_ ''_+1 + G_ +1)
is changed
Pi,j+_,k
used
((, _), are
semi-explicitly.
of the
block
technique
to remove
be rewritten
are treated values
of the
one 77 plane
in order
can then
in two directions
(7) flux terms
two costly
sweep,
flux terms
direction
using
Rizk
the
every
time,
algorithm.
q.+a Since
radial
is obtained
requires
the
direction.
are obtained
scheme:
to decrease
is reversed
E_, F,_, G¢
(I0)
every
iteration,
(11) the
F_ ''_+1 alternates
during the odd time steps,and Fn+l
n
i,j+l,k -
Fi,d-_,k
2A_
during the eventime steps. The tions
above
are
discretization
costly
nonlinearity
to solve
is removed
resulting
in the
leads since
to a set of algebraic
the
flux vectors
by linearising
following
linear
N and
the fluxes
equation
equations G are
about
the
for q.
highly
previous
These
equa-
nonlinear. time
The
step
value,
:
[I+Ar(a_A_+a