Article Template - Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis

7 downloads 2559 Views 390KB Size Report
perioperative plan for the patient discussed here, no clear perioperative .... plant 1998; 13:700–3. 16 Master U, Cruz C, Schmidt R, Dumler F, Babiarz J.
Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, Vol. 22, 2006

Myra A. Kleinpeter, N. Kevin Krane

On abdominal computed tomography scan for evaluation of hematuria, the index patient, a 23year-old male, was found to have multiple renal cysts bilaterally. He had been on peritoneal dialysis for 6 years, complicated by intermittent episodes of exit-site infection and peritonitis. Over time, he developed recurrent urinary tract infection and nephrolithiasis with intermittent hematuria. His maintenance dose of recombinant erythropoietin was discontinued, and he maintained a normal hemoglobin level. Annual surveillance of the bilateral renal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging revealed development of a complex cystic mass that warranted further investigation. Following a urology consultation, laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed without complications and with minimal interruption of PD. Pathology evaluation revealed renal cell carcinoma within the renal parenchyma and multiple cystic structures consistent with acquired cystic kidney disease. No clear recommendations exist in the literature regarding continuation or interruption of PD in the perioperative period for planned nephrectomy, tumor resection, or other uncomplicated abdominal or retroperitoneal procedures. A perioperative management strategy for PD patients requiring abdominal or retroperitoneal surgery is outlined here. If these recommendations are followed, patients may continue PD with minimal interruption, preservation of the peritoneal membrane, and few complications. Key words Laparoscopic nephrectomy, perioperative evaluation, acquired cystic disease From: Tulane University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.

Perioperative Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Review of Abdominal Surgery Introduction Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an established alternative renal replacement therapy for patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Complications arising from PD may require surgical intervention. These surgical procedures may result in interruption of PD and temporary hemodialysis (HD) (1). However, with the increased use of laparoscopy, many procedures may be performed with no need for HD and minimal interruption of PD (2). Case report The index patient, a 23-year-old male, had been on PD for 6 years secondary to hypertension. Initially, HD had been his renal replacement therapy for 2 years. He was converted to PD secondary to recurrent HD access complications. His PD course was complicated by recurrent episodes of exit-site infection and peritonitis, including interruption of PD (with temporary return to HD) secondary to peritonitis. This patient developed periodic episodes of urinary tract infection associated with nephrolithiasis. As a result of an earlier evaluation for nephrolithiasis, bilateral simple renal cysts had been identified by ultrasound examination. When macroscopic hematuria developed, another ultrasound examination revealed development of a complex cystic mass that warranted further evaluation. An earlier computed tomography scan had confirmed multiple renal cysts bilaterally. Annual surveillance of the bilateral multiple renal cysts by magnetic resonance imaging revealed a complex cystic mass that warranted urologic investigation. Following that investigation, laparoscopic nephrectomy was planned. In preparation for the surgical procedure, a cardiovascular risk assessment was made, and additional PD by the continuous cycling method (CCPD) was planned for the 3 preoperative

120 days. A right-sided laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed. On the third postoperative day, low-volume CCPD with 1000 mL low-calcium dialysate was performed while the patient remained in the supine position. During physical therapy and other scheduled tests, a 250 mL residual was left at disconnection. On postoperative day 7, the dialysate volume was increased to 2000 mL. The patient tolerated the increased volume without complications. Two weeks postoperatively, the patient resumed his usual preoperative PD prescription of 2800 mL CCPD, with a daily 2500 mL continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) exchange. The remainder of the patient’s postoperative course was unremarkable. He required introduction of erythropoietin to maintain hemoglobin at 12 g/dL. (His maintenance dose of erythropoietin had been discontinued approximately 4 years before surgery.) Pathology examination of the kidney demonstrated renal cell carcinoma confined to the kidney. Perinephric lymph nodes were negative for metastatic disease. The patient was staged as T1M0N0. Discussion Complications of PD include the infectious, the anatomic, and structural complications related to the PD catheter. Anatomic complications include hernias arising from earlier surgical incisions and inguinal and umbilical hernias. Abdominal wall and inguinal hernias are frequent complications of PD, requiring surgical intervention for repair. Before the introduction of laparoscopic techniques, surgical intervention often required interruption of PD, temporary HD, surgical repair, and postoperative recovery before PD could be resumed. The risk of catheter-related complications and the reluctance that many PD patients have regarding HD are significant concerns. Many examples exist in the literature where temporary interruption of PD occurs in association with laparoscopic procedures, followed by resumption of PD 1 – 3 days following the surgery (1,3–6). In patients at risk for abdominal hernias, automated PD with low daytime fill volumes should be considered (7). Additionally, in obese patients and older patients, the complication of peritoneal leak may require correction and result in interruption of PD (7). Laparoscopic management may be considered for these patients as well.

Kleinpeter and Krane Malfunctions of the PD catheter may result from migration, kinking, or omental wrapping. Management of these complications may require surgical intervention. However, with newer interventional radiology techniques, catheters may be repositioned using a guide wire. In these instances, PD may be resumed immediately following confirmation of position (8). In instances that require surgical manipulation of the catheter, PD may be interrupted. However, with the increased use of laparoscopy, many malpositioned catheters may be manipulated into the correct position. In these circumstances, PD may be resumed immediately or interrupted for no more than 1 day (9,10). If patients develop peritonitis and require catheter replacement, Postuma et al. have provided an example of removal and replacement of an infected catheter during the same surgical procedure without interruption of PD (4). Patients undergo removal of the infected catheter laparoscopically and replacement on the opposite side of the abdominal wall. Following the surgery, PD is resumed within 48 – 72 hours with low volumes. Over the next few weeks, patients may resume their preoperative dialysis prescription. During a literature review before creating the perioperative plan for the patient discussed here, no clear perioperative recommendations were found. The literature does provide many case reports and case series for PD patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures (Table I). Many examples exist for the management of PD patients who develop umbilical and inguinal hernias and who undergo surgical repair without interrupting PD for prolonged periods of time or without conversion to HD (3,4). In these examples, surgical repair has been followed by resumption of PD with low volumes for 1 – 7 days, followed by return to the preoperative PD prescription within 2 – 4 weeks of the surgical repair (4). In more invasive laparoscopic abdominal surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy or gynecologic surgery, PD using low volumes has been resumed 24 – 72 hours after the procedure (11–13). In these cases, patients resumed their preoperative dialysis prescription within 2 – 3 weeks of the surgical procedure. Laparoscopic nephrectomy has been performed for living related-donor transplant harvest and the removal of renal masses in otherwise healthy patients. Schwartz and Vestal described bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal masses in a case report in a dialysis patient (14). The resulting operative

Perioperative Management Strategies TABLE I

121

Summary of literature concerning surgical procedures in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients

Procedure Catheter manipulation Guide-wire Surgical Cholecystectomy Gynecologic surgery Hernia repair Cicatricial Incisional Inguinal or umbilical Open processus vaginalis Nephrectomy PD catheter replacement Salpingectomy

References

Anesthesia

8–10 9,10 13 2 11

Local General or local General General

5 General 6 3,5,6 General or local 4 5 General Case report General 15 Local 12 General

PD interruption (days)

PD modality

Laparoscopy

Complications

0 1–3 1–3 14 (HD) 1–3

No Yes Yes

CAPD, CCPD CAPD CAPD

Yes

None None None 4/10 Peritonitis None

1–3

No No No

None None None

CAPD, CCPD CAPD CAPD, CCPD

No Yes Yes Yes

None None None None

CAPD, CCPD CCPD CAPD CAPD

0–1 1-3 1–3 3 2–3 1

CAPD

CAPD = continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; CCPD = continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis; HD = hemodialysis.

time and cosmesis was acceptable, and the low surgical morbidity lends credence to this approach in dialysis patients. In the perioperative management of PD patients (Table II), evaluation of cardiovascular risk, as well as surgical risk, needs to occur. Most dialysis patients have significant cardiovascular risk factors that may delay surgical procedures or result in modification of their perioperative management. Perioperative management in PD patients requiring surgery should also include optimizing anemia management for a target hemoglobin of 12 – 13 g/dL by using a combination of intravenous iron administration, erythropoietin, blood, and blood products as warranted. If patients may require blood transfusion, the transfusion should be done preoperatively, with additional dialysis to optimize volume status preoperatively. To improve intraoperative hemostasis, daily preventive aspirin should be discontinued 1 week before surgery in those patients on this regimen. Uremia causes platelet dysfunction and may alter hemostasis in surgical patients., Additional preoperative dialysis may therefore be indicated for PD patients. Patients on CCPD may perform PD nearly continuously for 48 – 72 hours before surgery. Patients on CAPD may perform PD every 3 – 4 hours while awake for 48 – 72 hours before surgery.

In an effort to prevent postoperative infections, prophylactic antibiotics may be administered as appropriate to the surgical procedure (2). Intraoperatively, when possible, a laparoscopic approach should be used. This approach will shorten the postoperative recovery period and minimize the need to convert PD patients to HD. Additionally, intravenous fluid administration should be minimized to reduce the necessity of immediate postoperative dialysis for volume overload. Postoperatively, PD may be resumed immediately if abdominal wall integrity is maintained (8–10). For many abdominal laparoscopic procedures, PD with low volumes may be resumed on postoperative days 1 – 3 with the patient in a supine position (3,5,6,9– 13,15). Exchange volumes may be gradually increased over the next week if the patient tolerates the increase. In most patients, the preoperative dialysis prescription may be resumed at 2 – 3 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative anemia management should also be optimized using intravenous iron, erythropoietin, and blood products as clinically indicated. Meticulous exitsite care and PD technique should be emphasized to minimize the risk of infectious PD complications. Surgical wound care should be just as meticulous to minimize the risk of wound infection. Acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) is a known complication of dialysis patients and was first

122 TABLE II

Kleinpeter and Krane Recommendations for perioperative management of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients

Recommendation

Level

Cardiovascular risk assessment Optimize anemia management for a target hemoglobin of 12 – 13 g/dL Discontinue acetylsalicylic acid 1 week before the planned surgical procedure Additional dialysis preoperatively 48 – 78 hours before the surgical procedure Laparoscopic approach when possible for abdominal surgical procedures in PD patients Preoperative administration of prophylactic antibiotics depending on the particular abdominal procedure Resumption of PD immediately after surgery if abdominal wall integrity is maintained Resumption of PD on postoperative days 1 – 3 with low volumes in a supine position Resumption of preoperative PD prescription 2 – 3 weeks postoperatively Meticulous exit-site care and technique to minimize risk of infectious complications Meticulous wound care to minimize risk of wound infection

described more than a hundred years ago. When ACKD occurs in PD patients, patients may initially be asymptomatic. As cyst progression occurs, complications can range from none at all to combinations of flank pain, nephrolithiasis, infection, bleeding, hematuria, malignancy, erythrocytosis, and benign tumors (16). If tumors occur as a complication of ACKD, definitive treatment may require interruption of PD for resection. The frequency of ACKD in low in PD patients (16–18). The present report emphasizes the fact that ACKD remains a potential complication of longterm dialysis in PD patients. In the presence of hematuria, further evaluation for ACKD is warranted. This review provides a management strategy (Table II) for PD patients who develop ACKD to continue PD with minimal interruption to perform a laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions Using the management strategy outlined here, PD patients may undergo abdominal or retroperitoneal surgical procedures with minimal interruption to PD. Using the laparoscopic approach, the postoperative course may be significantly shorter. Monitoring chronic PD patients for the development of malignancy in ACKD should be considered. Early intervention by laparoscopic nephrectomy using the management strategy outlined here will maintain the PD treatment modality. References 1 Moffat FL, Deitel M, Thompson DA. Abdominal surgery in patients undergoing long-term peritoneal dialysis. Surgery 1982; 92:598–604.

A A A B B A B B B A A

2 Goel S, Ribby KJ, Kathuria P, Khanna R. Temporary stoppage of peritoneal dialysis when laparoscopic procedures are performed on patients undergoing CAPD/CCPD: a change in policy. Adv Perit Dial 1998; 14:80–2. 3 Gianetta E, Civalleri D, Serventi A, et al. Anterior tension-free repair under local anesthesia of abdominal wall hernias in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Hernia 2004; 8:354–7. 4 Tast C, Kuhlmann U, Stolzing H, Alscher D, Mettang T. Continuing CAPD after herniotomy. EDTNA ERCA J 2002; 28:173–5. 5 Mettang T, Stoeltzing H, Alscher DM, Magadum S, Dunst R, Kuhlmann U. Sustaining continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after herniotomy. Adv Perit Dial 2001; 17:84–7. 6 Chan HM, Hsieh JS, Huang CJ, et al. Abdominal wall hernia complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1994; 10:444–8. 7 Del Peso G, Bajo MA, Costero O, et al. Risk factors for abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23:249–54. 8 Kawamoto S, Yamamoto H, Nakayama M, Kawaguchi Y, Hosoya T. Correction of CAPD catheter displacement using alpha-replacement method. Clin Exp Nephrol 2005; 9:53–7. 9 Kim HJ, Lee TW, Ihm CG, Kim MJ. Use of fluoroscopy-guided wire manipulation and/or laparoscopic surgery in the repair of malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Nephrol 2002; 22:532–8. 10 Ogunc G. Malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheter and accompanying surgical pathology repaired by laparoscopic surgery. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22:454–62. 11 Bellizzi V, Giannoulias D, Al-Sunaid M, et al. Gynecological surgery: not a contraindication for continuation of CAPD. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23:193–6.

Perioperative Management Strategies 12 Moreiras–Plaza M, Caceres–Alvarado N. Peritoneal dialysis obstruction caused by fallopian tube wrapping. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44:e28–30. 13 Magnuson TH, Bender JS, Campbell KA, Ratner LE. Cholecystectomy in the peritoneal dialysis patient. Unique advantages to the laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 1995; 9:908–9. 14 Schwartz BF, Vestal JC. Bilateral purely laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal masses using five ports without repositioning: a case report. J Endourol 2004; 18:449–52. 15 Posthuma N, Borgstein PJ, Eijsbouts Q, ter Wee PM. Simultaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and removal in catheter-related infections without interruption of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:700–3. 16 Master U, Cruz C, Schmidt R, Dumler F, Babiarz J.

123 Renal malignancy in peritoneal dialysis patients with acquired cystic kidney disease. Adv Perit Dial 1992; 8:145–9. 17 Trabucco AF, Johansson SL, Egan JD, Taylor RJ. Neoplasia and acquired renal cystic disease in patients undergoing chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Urology 1990; 35:1–4. 18 Katz A, Sombolos K, Oreopoulos DG. Acquired cystic disease of the kidney in association with chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1987; 9:426–9.

Corresponding author: Myra A. Kleinpeter, MD MPH, 1430 Tulane Avenue, SL45, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]