Authentication of dried distilled grain with solubles ...

3 downloads 0 Views 923KB Size Report
Jun 2, 2014 - of Simone Mooiboek, Rita Boerrigter-Eenling and Alex Koot ... N., Dugan, M. E. R., Aalhus, J. L., McAllister, T. A., Walter, L. J., & McKinnon, J. J..
LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

LWT - Food Science and Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt

Authentication of dried distilled grain with solubles (DDGS) by fatty acid and volatile profiling Alba Tres, Samuel P. Heenan*, Saskia van Ruth RIKILT e Wageningen University and Research Centre, Akkermaalsbos, 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands

a r t i c l e i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history: Received 1 October 2013 Received in revised form 18 May 2014 Accepted 21 May 2014 Available online 2 June 2014

Demand for ethanol substituted fuels from the utilisation of cereal based biofuel has resulted in an over production of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) that are now readily available on the animal feed market. With this rapid emerging availability comes potential variability in the nutritional value of DDGS and possible risks of feed contaminants. Subsequently, the authentication and traceability of alternative animal feed sources is of high priority. In this study and as part of the EU research project “Quality and Safety of Feeds and Food for Europe (QSAFFE FP7-KBBE-2010-4) an attempt was made to classify the geographical origin of cereal grains used in the production of DDGS material. DDGS material of wheat and corn origin were obtained from Europe, China, and the USA. Fatty acid profiles and volatile fingerprints were assessed by gas chromatography flame ionisation (GC-FID) and rapid proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) respectively. Chemometric analysis of fatty acid profiles and volatile fingerprints allowed for promising classifications of cereals used in DDGS material by geographical and botanical origin and enabled visual representation of the data. This objective analytical approach could be adapted for routine verification of cereal grains used in the production of DDGS material. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Fingerprinting Authenticity Dried distillers grains

1. Introduction Emerging low cost animal feed stock, originating from bioprocessing and food production is increasing on a global scale. In particular, DDGS are obtained from ethanol distillation by drying solid residues of fermented cereal grains with the addition of pot ale syrup or evaporated spent wash. DDGS present a high concentration of energy, protein and ruminally undegradable protein, especially with respect to the original grains (Belyea et al., 2010; Rasco et al., 1987). This, together with low cost has promoted their use as a feed ingredient for several animal species (Aldai, Dugan, Rolland, & Kramer, 2009; Liu, 2011; Stein & Shurson, 2009; Swiatkiewicz & Koreleski, 2008). Despite the original source, from alcoholic distillation, DDGS are now increasingly available from the emerging biofuel industry (Holffman & Baker, 2011). With this new source of availability comes potential risks

Abbreviations: DDGS, distillers dried grains with solubles; FA, fatty acids; PCA, principal component analysis; PLS-DA, partial least squares-discriminant analysis; PTR-MS, proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry; VOC, volatile compounds. * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ31 317 480372; fax: þ31 317 417717. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (S.P. Heenan). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.044 0023-6438/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

of feed contaminants (Liu, 2011). Subsequently, the global expansion of DDGS material has raised concerns for the animal feed industry, resulting in potential implications for compliance with regulatory agencies. DDGS are mainly obtained from corn (especially in the USA), followed by wheat. DDGS may also originate from other grains such as barley, sorghum and rice, as well as from grain blends (Aldai et al., 2009; Liu, 2011; Nuez-Ortin & Yu, 2009). One of the main problems hindering DDGS use as animal feed is their high variation in nutrient concentrations and nutritional quality among different sources. The inconsistency in nutrient value can contribute to imbalanced feed formulations leading to diminished animal productivity (Belyea et al., 2010; Belyea, Rausch, & Tumbleson, 2004). Apart from the effects on animal growth performance and other productivity parameters, it is well-known that feed FA content influences tissue FA composition, which highly determines the nutritional properties of animal products for human consumption (Bou, Codony, Tres, Decker, & Guardiola, 2009).Therefore, controlling all factors that contribute to DDGS composition (such as grain botanical source, geographical origin and production method) could help deliver a high quality standard for DDGS and ensure their market value. The authentication of botanical and geographical origin relies on the recognition of several markers typical of the variety of grains used in production

216

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

and the country they were grown. However the natural variability of chemical composition prevents having one discriminative marker for any specific material. As an alternative strategy, fingerprinting techniques are nowadays used for authentication purposes (Bosque-Sendra, Cuadros-Rodriguez, Ruiz-Samblas, & de la Mata, 2012). Most studies on DDGS composition have evaluated DDGS nutrient composition (protein, oil, ash, carbohydrates, fibre contents) (Belyea et al., 2010; Liu, 2011; Nuez-Ortin & Yu, 2009; Rasco et al., 1987) but only a few have addressed its detailed chemical profiles (Aldai et al., 2010; Moreau, Liu, Winkler-Moser, & Singh, 2011; Winkler-Moser & Breyer, 2011; Winkler-Moser & Vaughn, 2009). FA fingerprinting has proven to be suitable for discriminate among wheat grain varieties, origin and year of harvest (Armanino, De Acutis, & Rosa Festa, 2002), but also to verify the authenticity of numerous food stuffs in relation to several identity aspects (Tres, Ruiz-Samblas, van der Veer, & van Ruth, 2013; Tres, van der Veer, Perez-Marin, van Ruth, & Garrido-Varo, 2012; Ulberth & Buchgraber, 2000). These previous findings, together with the fact that different DDGS sources led to variations in the FA profile of animal tissues and rumen fluid (Aldai et al., 2010, 2012) suggest FA composition as a promising strategy for the DDGS classification. In addition, the FA profile coupled with other important food constitutes such as volatile profiles is one promising approach capable of distinguishing high fat containing foods by geographical origin and/ or botanical identity (Araghipour et al., 2008; Luykx & van Ruth, 2008; Tres et al., 2013; van Ruth, Rozijn, et al., 2010; van Ruth, Villegas, et al., 2010). Consequently, the aim of this study is to authenticate the botanical and geographical origin of DDGS by FA and volatile fingerprinting. This, together with the fact that the determination of FA composition is a quite common analysis in food laboratory, makes it a promising technique to help verify DDGS identity. 2. Material and methods 2.1. Samples A total of 82 DDGS samples were collected in the framework of the QSAFFE EU funded project (QSAFFE FP7-KBBE-2010-4). DDGS samples were collected from six different countries (USA, Canada, France, Spain, Poland, and the Chinese provinces Jilin and Heilongjiang) between 2011 and 2012, they originated from two different botanical species (corn and wheat) and from the production of biofuel and alcoholic beverages (Supplementary Table 1). In addition a set of samples of unknown geographical origin were also obtained. All samples were pre-ground with a centrifugal mill (ZM 200, Retsch, Germany) using a mesh size of 0.5 mm. Prior to analysis, samples were stored in capped plastic vials, which were kept in the dark at 20  C. 2.2. Reagents and standards Sodium methoxide (0.5 N) was purchased from SigmaeAldrich (St Louis, MO). Boron trifluoride methanol complex (35%) was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The FA methyl ester mixture of standards was supplied by Supelco (Supelco 37 Component FAME mix, Supelco, St. Louis, MO). All the other reagents were of ACS quality grade. 2.3. Fatty acid composition Fat was extracted from DDGS with chloroform:methanol (2:1, v/ v) as described in Tres and van Ruth et al., (2011), using half gram of sample. The FA methyl esters were obtained as described in Guardiola, Codony, Rafecas, and Boatella (1994), and were

determined by gas chromatography using a Thermo Focus GC (Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Italy), fitted with a flame-ionisation detector and splitesplitless injector port, set at 270  C and 250  C, respectively. The split ratio was 1:30. Chromatographic separation of FA methyl esters was performed on CP-Select CB for FAME (3cyanopropyl polysiloxane) capillary column (50 m  0.25 mm i.d.; film thickness 0.25 mm, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). Helium (18 psi) was used as carrier gas, and the oven was programmed as follows: initial temperature 100  C, increased at 5  C/min to 230  C and held for 9 min. The sample volume injected was 1 mL. Fatty acids were identified by their retention times according to those found in the FAME standard mixture. All DDGS samples were analysed in triplicate and results were expressed as normalised peak areas (%). Data used was the average value of the three replicates for each sample. 2.4. Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry The volatile fingerprint of DDGS samples were measured in triplicate using a high sensitivity PTR-MS instrument (Ionicon Analytik, Innsbruck, Austria). All measurements were carried out under drift tube conditions of 120e140 Td (Td ¼ Townsend; 1 Td ¼ 1017 V cm2 mol1) over a mass range of m/z ¼ 20 to m/ z ¼ 160 and a dwell time of 0.2 s mass1, giving a cycle time of 32 s. Each ground DDGS sample was separately weighed (25 g) into 250 mL glass bottles (Schott Duran bottles, Germany) and allowed to equilibrate at room temperature (~25  C) for 30 min. Bottles were connected to the PTR-MS inlet flow that was heated to 60  C via Teflon (0.25 mm) tubing and headspace air was sampled at a flow rate of 50 ml/min. Masses were analysed in a quadrupole mass spectrometer and detected as ion counts per second (cps) by a secondary electron multiplier (SEM). Mass ion intensities were converted to concentration (ppbv) according to (Lindinger, Hansel, & Jordan, 1998). Sample measurements were performed in 5 cycles resulting in an analysis time of 3.0 min. The mean of cycles 2e4 were represented in further analysis. Background air scans of five cycles were conducted from an empty bottle before each sample measurement and the mean signal was subtracted from the sample spectra (Aprea et al., 2007). Then, the three averaged mass spectrums of the three replicates for each sample were averaged to obtain a mean mass spectrum per sample. In this manner, a dataset containing mean mass spectra per sample analysed could be compiled. M/z 32 (Oþ 2 ) and m/z 37 (water cluster ion) that are associated with the PTR-MS ion source were removed from the data set. The order of sample and triplicate measurements were randomised to account for possible memory affects. 2.5. Statistics The data matrix consisted of as many rows as samples (n ¼ 82) and as many columns as variables (19 for FA composition matrix and 158 for VOC fingerprint matrix). For multivariate modelling and classification we used Pirouette 4.0 (Infometrix, Seattle, USA). With the 82 samples PCA was performed for both the FA and VOC data, to screen the multivariate data for outliers and to explore the presence of any natural clustering in the data. Several data preprocessing techniques including: none, auto-scaling (scaling to unit variance), mean centring, logarithmic transformation and a combination of these techniques for FA and VOC data sets were applied to evaluate the contribution of all variables (fatty acids and mass ions). The purpose of pre-processing in this case was to allow for all variables to give equal influence to the PCA model, regardless of their original variance. PLS-DA was conducted to develop a classification model to help verify the identity of DDGS samples. Several PLS-DA models were developed according to the feature to be classified: botanical origin (corn vs wheat), geographical origin

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

of corn DDGS samples (USA vs Jilin province in China vs Heilongjiang province in China) and production method for corn DDGS samples (biofuel vs alcoholic beverages). To develop and validate the PLS-DA classification models, each sample set was divided into a training set (consisting of a random selection of 70% of the samples from each category) and a validation set (the remaining 30% of samples from each category). The training sets of samples were used to develop the models, and to internally validate them by leave-10% out cross-validation. Once the models were developed, they were externally validated by predicting the identity of the DDGS samples in the validation set. The performance of the models was assessed by their percentage accuracy (i.e. correctly predicted samples divided by the number of samples in the class) in predicting each class correctly. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. DDGS botanical identity PCA was conducted as an exploratory technique on the DDGS FA and VOC data (n ¼ 82) separately. Both the FA and VOC PCA scores plots revealed some natural clustering of the DDGS samples which was in agreement with their botanical origin (Fig. 1). No outlier samples were observed for the FA composition or the VOC data. In both approaches, corn DDGS clustered separately from wheat DDGS samples regardless of production method and or geographical origin. Therefore, a classification model was developed using PLSDA on each data set (FA and VOC) to help verify differences among botanical origin of the grain from which DDGS were produced. 3.1.1. DDGS botanical identity by FA profile: classification model The PLS-DA model on the FA profile (after data auto-scaling) correctly classified (both the internal and the external validation data sets) all wheat and almost all corn samples (Table 1). The unclassified corn samples were not assigned to wheat or corn as the models were not capable of classifying these samples. In this case an unclassified sample could be defined as somewhat different to other samples in terms of the presence or absence of fatty acids in relation to the class group of corn. Subsequently, these samples full outside the limits of the model and are difficult to classify. Despite the limited unassigned corn samples, these results showed that it can be possible to distinguish the botanical identity of the grains used to produce DDGS by the FA content. Comparisons of the PLSDA scores and loadings plots revealed the FA responsible for differences among the corn and wheat samples (Fig. 2). A high contribution of C18:1 n-9 (oleic), C18:0 (stearic) and C20:0 was observed for the separation of the corn from the wheat samples.

217

Separation of wheat from corn samples was driven by the monounsaturated FA n-6 and n-3 families, such as linoleic (C18:2 n-6) and linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3). This is in agreement with the differences encountered for individual FA between botanical sources of DDGS by univariate analysis (Supplementary Table 2), which is supported by Armanino et al. (2002), Winkler-Moser and Breyer (2011), and Moreau et al. (2011) findings, where FA composition depended on botanical variety of the grains. 3.1.2. DDGS botanical identity by VOC fingerprinting: classification model Good classifications were obtained by the PLS-DA model using the VOC data, with almost all samples being correctly classified in the internal and in the external validation sets. Observations along the positive factor of the PLS-DA plots (Fig. 3) indicated that corn were separated from wheat DDGS by mass ions [m/z] 34, 33, 35, 51, and 73, while along the negative axis wheat was separated from corn DDGS by m/z 68, 75, 76, 81, 85, 86, 113, 127, 128. Several VOC detected in DDGS have been associated with the fermentation process, the initiation of Maillard reaction (Seabolt, van Heugten, Kim, Ange-van Heugten, & Roura, 2010), or the ratio of amylopectin to amylose (Belyea et al., 2010) all of which might vary depending on the botanical origin of grains leading to detectable differences in volatile profiles. 3.2. DDGS geographical origin A clear separation of corn samples in two different groups corresponding to DDGS from different geographical origins was observed, especially on the FA data PCA (Fig. 1). To further explore this clustering PCA was conducted on both FA and VOC profiles using only corn samples from known geographical origins (n ¼ 54) (corn samples from unknown geographical origin were not included). For FA data the PCA scores plot showed three different clusters corresponding to USA, and the two Chinese provinces Heilongjiang and Jilin, while observations from the VOC PCA scores plot showed less evidence of cluster by country of origin (data not shown). 3.2.1. DDGS geographical origin by FA profile: classification model Internal validation of the PLS-DA model based on the FA profile (after auto-scaling) revealed that almost all samples were correctly assigned to their geographical origin (Table 1). In fact, only two USA samples were not assigned to any origin. By external validation, all samples were correctly assigned to their geographical origin, which suggests that FA profiling could be used to help verify the geographical origin of corn DDGS. PLS-DA models discriminating among more than 2 categories, develop one sub-model for each

Fig. 1. First two factors of the PCA scores plot based on the fatty acid composition (A) and the volatile profile (B) of corn (◊) and wheat (A) DDGS samples (auto-scaled data).

218

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

Table 1 Identification of DDGS botanical identity and geographical origin: validation of PLS-DA models built on the fatty acid and VOC profiles. Botanical origin

Correct classifications (%)

Geographical origin

Internal validationa

External validation

Correct classifications (%) Internal validationa

External validation

Fatty acid composition

Corn Wheat

97.9% 100%

95.2% 100%

USA Heilongjiang Jilin

87.5% 100% 100%

100% 100% 100%

Volatile organic compound fingerprint

Corn Wheat

97.9% 97.9%

97.9% 100%

USA Heilongjiang Jilin

100% 100% 85.7%

100% 100% 100%

a

Internal validation by leave 10%-out cross-validation.

category. In these sub-models, samples belonging to each category are discriminated from all the other samples (i.e. USA vs non-USA; Heilongjiang vs non-Heilongjiang; Jilin vs non-Jilin). For example, Fig. 4 shows that monounsaturated FA of the n-9 series such as C18:1 n-9 and C20:1 n-9 are important for the discrimination of the USA corn from all the other corn DDGS. Alternatively, samples from Jilin are discriminated from samples of Heilongjiang and USA by a high contribution of linoleic acid, while samples from Heilongjiang are discriminated by a high contribution of several n-3 polyunsaturated FA such as linolenic acid, some monounsaturated FA (except oleic acid and C20:1 n-9) and some saturated FA such as stearic palmitic acid (data not shown). These findings are in agreement with differences in the content of the individual FA

between the three geographical origins (Supplementary Table 3). To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies in literature addressing the differences in corn DDGS FA composition between these geographical origins, making it difficult to explain the factors behind these results. However, differences in the FA composition according to the geographical location in other commodities such as palm or olive oil (Tres et al., 2013; Garcia-Gonzalez, Luna, Morales, & Aparicio, 2009) have been related to differences in the botanical identity grown in each origin, to pedoclimatic conditions as well as to variations in the production process. Therefore, it is likely that these factors are also responsible for the differences observed in corn DDGS. In fact, it has been reported that besides the botanical source, the production method (i.e. type of process,

Fig. 2. Botanical identity of DDGS by fatty acid profile (auto-scaled data): PLS-DA scores plot of corn (◊) and wheat (A) DDGS (A) and loadings plot of FA (B).

Fig. 3. Botanical identity of DDGS by volatile finger-print (auto-scaled data): PLS-DA scores plot (A) of corn (◊), wheat (A) and loadings plot (B).

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

219

Fig. 4. Verification of the geographical origin of corn DDGS: PLS-DA scores plot (A) of USA (◊), Jilin (▵), Heilongjiang (▫), and loadings plots (B) of the fatty acid based models for USA compared to Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces of China.

drying step, amount of solubles added back to distillers wet grains) influence the final nutrient composition of DDGS (Belyea et al., 2010; Stein, Connot, & Pedersen, 2009).Fig. 5

samples. Due to the low number of samples that could be included in the production method, all samples were used as training set and the model was only internally validated by leave-10% out crossvalidation.

3.3. Identification of DDGS production process DDGS are a by-product of ethanol production through fermentation of grains to produce fuel or alcoholic beverages. As reported in literature, differences in production processes might lead to differences in DDGS composition. Therefore, we investigated whether FA profile or VOC fingerprinting could be a useful strategy to help verify the production process by which DDGS had been obtained (fuel vs beverage). However, our sample set only contained a few samples for which the full information on the production process was not available. Since we have observed that the botanical source of grains has a remarkable influence on DDGS composition, wheat DDGS were not included in the DDGS production model. Therefore, 31 corn samples were considered, of which 19 were from ethanol beverage production and 12 were from biofuel ethanol based production. Results from PCA on the VOC fingerprint showed some natural grouping in agreement with the DDGS production method (fuel vs beverage). However, there was some overlap between both clusters in the PCA on the FA composition data (data not shown). PLS-DA was attempted with all 31

3.3.1. Identification of DDGS production process by FA profile: classification model FA fingerprinting did not seem a promising technique to discriminate DDGS production method because of several (35%) misclassifications occurring during model internal validation. However, considering the high influence of the geographical origin on DDGS FA composition in this study, it is likely that the geographical identity of DDGS masked any possible differences between samples derived from fuel or beverage industries. Unfortunately, there were not enough DDGS samples produced as coproducts of the fuel and the beverage industries from the same country to perform a classification model (fuel vs beverage) for each country. It is therefore advisable to increase the DDGS sample set before discarding FA fingerprinting for this verification purpose. 3.3.2. Identification of DDGS production process by VOC fingerprint: classification model VOC PLS-DA classification demonstrated that 100% of DDGS from beverage production and 91.6% of DDGS from biofuel

Fig. 5. Verification of the geographical origin of corn DDGS: PLS-DA scores plot of USA (◊), Jilin (▵), Heilongjiang (▫) (A) and factor 1 loadings plots (B) of the volatile profile based model for USA compared to provinces Jilin and Heilongjiang from China.

220

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221

Fig. 6. Verification of the production method of corn DDGS: PLS-DA scores plot of beverage (◊), biofuel (▫) (A) and factor 1 loadings plots (B) of the volatile profile based models for production method.

production were correctly classified, leaving only one sample unassigned. Thus volatile profiling showed improved results when compared to FA profiling for distinguishing method of production. Beverage DDGS were separated from biofuel produced DDGS along the negative axis of factor 1 as a result of a high contribution of m/z 43, 44, 61, 62, 63, 64 and 110 (Fig. 6). In contrast a high contribution of m/z 42, 49, 87, 88, 89, 101, 102, 133 and 134 were responsible for separating biofuel from beverage produced samples along the positive axis of factor 1. In correspondence with literature and where compounds are present in DDGS, masses could be tentatively assigned to propylene glycol and/or 3-Methyl-1-butanol (m/z 43), acetic acid and/or a fragment of ethyl acetate (m/z 61), dimethyl sulphide (m/z 63), diacetyl (m/z 87), and ethyl acetate (m/ z 88). In particular acetic acid and diacetyl are associated with byproducts from fermentation and therefore dependent on the process (Seabolt et al., 2010). These findings are in line with previous reports that suggest that processing technique including fermentation and drying parameters yield high variability between DDGS composition (Belyea et al., 2010; Liu, 2011; Nuez-Ortin & Yu, 2009). For example Nuez-Ortin and Yu (2009) suggested that during fermentation some biofuel plants add significant amounts of sulphuric acid to adjust the pH, resulting in sulphur rich DDGS products. Despite the tentative assignment of some masses due to production process and as consequence further studies are required to help verify the identity of compounds derived from DDGS samples. 4. Conclusions In summary, the classification of the botanical and geographical origin and production process of DDGS using both FA and VOC profiles showed promising results. While volatile profiling using PTR-MS offered comparable results to FA fingerprinting; the latter is an analytical determination quite common in most food analytical laboratories. Regarding the identification of the DDGS production process, VOC fingerprinting offered a more successful classification approach than FA profiles, which is likely to be related to specific volatiles generated during the different fermentation, drying and manufacturing processes occurring in beverage or biofuel production. The classification models developed in this study represent a promising proof of concept study that could be expanded in the future to other DDGS botanical sources and geographical origins (i.e. for wheat DDGS), provided that new authentic samples are included in the sample sets. Apart from authentication purposes, DDGS compositional data and

classification of its botanical, geographical origin and production process might be important information for feed producers, because it is well-known that feed composition might determine feed digestibility, animal growth, health and composition of animal products such as meat or milk. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the 7th Framework Programme QSAFE (FP7-KBBE-2010-4) for providing funding and samples for this work. The authors would also like to acknowledge the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under a grant agreement PIEF-GA-2009-251972 (Marie Curie IEF) awarded to A Tres. Finally the authors thank very much the technical support of Simone Mooiboek, Rita Boerrigter-Eenling and Alex Koot throughout the duration of this work. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.044. References Aldai, N., Dugan, M. E. R., Aalhus, J. L., McAllister, T. A., Walter, L. J., & McKinnon, J. J. (2010). Differences in the trans-18:1 profile of the backfat of feedlot steers fed wheat or corn based dried distillers' grains. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 157(3e4), 168e172. Aldai, N., Dugan, M. E. R., Rolland, D. C., & Kramer, J. K. G. (2009). Fatty acid composition of Western Canadian beef: 1. Backfat. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 89(1), 315e329. Aldai, N., Klieve, A. V., Dugan, M. E. R., Kramer, J. K. G., Ouwerkerk, D., Aalhus, J. L., et al. (2012). Evaluation of rumen fatty acid hydrogenation intermediates and differences in bacterial communities after feeding wheat- or corn-based dried distillers grains to feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 90(8), 2699e2709. Aprea, E., Biasioli, F., Gasperi, F., Mott, D., Marini, F., & Mark, T. D. (2007). Assessment of Trentingrana cheese ageing by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry and chemometrics. International Dairy Journal, 17(3), 226e234. Araghipour, N., Colineau, J., Koot, A., Akkermans, W., Rojas, J. M. M., Beauchamp, J., et al. (2008). Geographical origin classification of olive oils by PTR-MS. Food Chemistry, 108, 374e383. Armanino, C., De Acutis, R., & Rosa Festa, M. (2002). Wheat lipids to discriminate species, varieties, geographical origins and crop years. Analytica Chimica Acta, 454(2), 315e326. Belyea, R. L., Rausch, K. D., Clevenger, T. E., Singh, V., Johnston, D. B., & Tumbleson, M. E. (2010). Sources of variation in composition of DDGS. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 159(3e4), 122e130. Belyea, R. L., Rausch, K. D., & Tumbleson, M. E. (2004). Composition of corn and distillers dried grains with solubles from dry grind ethanol processing. Bioresource Technology, 94(3), 293e298.

A. Tres et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 59 (2014) 215e221 Bosque-Sendra, J. M., Cuadros-Rodriguez, L., Ruiz-Samblas, C., & de la Mata, A. P. (2012). Combining chromatography and chemometrics for the characterization and authentication of fats and oils from triacylglycerol compositional data e a review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 724, 1e11. Bou, R., Codony, R., Tres, A., Decker, E. A., & Guardiola, F. (2009). Dietary strategies to improve nutritional value, oxidative stability, and sensory properties of poultry products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 49(9), 800e822. Garcia-Gonzalez, D. L., Luna, G., Morales, M. T., & Aparicio, R. (2009). Stepwise geographical traceability of virgin olive oils by chemical profiles using artificial neural network models. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 111(10), 1003e1013. Guardiola, F., Codony, R., Rafecas, M., & Boatella, J. (1994). Selective gaschromatographic determination of cholesterol in eggs. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 71(8), 867e871. Holffman, L. A., & Baker, A. (2011). Estimating the substitution of distiller's grains for corn and soybean meal in the U.S. feed complex. United States Department of Agriculture. Lindinger, W., Hansel, A., & Jordan, A. (1998). Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS): on-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels. Chemical Society Reviews, 27(5), 347e354. Liu, K. (2011). Chemical composition of distillers grains, a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(5), 1508e1526. Luykx, D. M. A. M., & van Ruth, S. M. (2008). An overview of analytical methods for determining the geographical origin of food products. Food Chemistry, 107(2), 897e911. Moreau, R. A., Liu, K. S., Winkler-Moser, J. K., & Singh, V. (2011). Changes in lipid composition during dry grind ethanol processing of corn. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 88(3), 435e442. Nuez-Ortin, W. G., & Yu, P. (2009). Nutrient variation and availability of wheat DDGS, corn DDGS and blend DDGS from bioethanol plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 89(10), 1754e1761. Rasco, B. A., Dong, F. M., Hashisaka, A. E., Gazzaz, S. S., Downey, S. E., & Buenaventura, M. L. S. (1987). Chemical-composition of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) from soft white wheat, hard red wheat and corn. Journal of Food Science, 52(1), 236e237. van Ruth, S. M., Rozijn, M., Koot, A., Garcia, R. P., van der Kamp, H., & Codony, R. (2010). Authentication of feeding fats: classification of animal fats, fish oils and

221

recycled cooking oils. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 155(1), 65e73. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.09.016. van Ruth, S. M., Villegas, B., Akkermans, W., Rozijn, M., van der Kamp, H., & Koot, A. (2010). Prediction of the identity of fats and oils by their fatty acid, triacylglycerol and volatile compositions using PLS-DA. Food Chemistry, 118(4), 948e955. Seabolt, B. S., van Heugten, E., Kim, S. W., Ange-van Heugten, K. D., & Roura, E. (2010). Feed preferences and performance of nursery pigs fed diets containing various inclusion amounts and qualities of distillers coproducts and flavor. Journal of Animal Science, 88(11), 3725e3738. Stein, H. H., Connot, S. P., & Pedersen, C. (2009). Energy and nutrient digestibility in four sources of distillers dried grains with solubles produced from corn grown within a narrow geographical area and fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22(7), 1016e1025. Stein, H. H., & Shurson, G. C. (2009). Board-invited review: the use and application of distillers dried grains with solubles in swine diets. Journal of Animal Science, 87(4), 1292e1303. Swiatkiewicz, S., & Koreleski, J. (2008). The use of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal, 64(2), 257e265. Tres, A., Ruiz-Samblas, C., van der Veer, G., & van Ruth, S. M. (2013). Geographical provenance of palm oil by fatty acid and volatile compound fingerprinting techniques. Food Chemistry, 137(1e4), 142e150. Tres, A., van der Veer, G., Perez-Marin, M. D., van Ruth, S. M., & Garrido-Varo, A. (2012). Authentication of organic feed by near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics: a feasibility study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(33), 8129e8133. Tres, A., & van Ruth, S. M. (2011). Verification of organic feed identity by fatty acid fingerprinting. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(16), 8816e8821. Ulberth, F., & Buchgraber, M. (2000). Authenticity of fats and oils. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 102(11), 687e694. Winkler-Moser, J. K., & Breyer, L. (2011). Composition and oxidative stability of crude oil extracts of corn germ and distillers grains. Industrial Crops and Products, 33(3), 572e578. Winkler-Moser, J. K., & Vaughn, S. F. (2009). Antioxidant activity of phytochemicals from distillers dried grain oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 86(11), 1073e1082.