Chemical Physical Properties of Bio-coal

92 downloads 0 Views 825KB Size Report
Jun 7, 2012 - Not (grilling) charcoal. Not bio-char (soil additive). Not bio-carbon (high-end technical carbon product). Note: Especially confusing in ...
Nordic Environmental Chemistry Conference, Kakskerta,Turku, 4-7 June, 2012

Chemical Physical Properties of Bio-coal Defining the thermal regime known as torrefaction David Agar1 Margareta Wihersaari2 1 Department

of Chemistry 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä

Presentation Outline  Introduction  What is Bio-coal?  Why Bio-coal?

 Torrefaction    

Process overview The torrefaction regime Solid fuel properties of torrefied wood Torrefaction versus carbonisation

 Bio-coal production  Active players in Europe  Three key properties of bio-coal from experiment data  Conclusions

What is Bio-coal?  Solid fuel made from biomass (renewable)  Fossil coal substitute  High heating value (MJ/kg, compared to untreated biomass)  High bulk energy density (MJ/m3)  Handling properties like fossil coal (easy to grind)

 Fuel for coal-fired power plants (large-scale production)

Bio-coal as briquette

Bio-coal as pellets

What Bio-coal is NOT  Not (grilling) charcoal  Not bio-char (soil additive)  Not bio-carbon (high-end technical carbon product)  Note: Especially confusing in Finnish

Bio-coal Bio-char Bio-carbon

Biohiili

The Finnish language may have many different words for snow but this is not the case for high-carbon products 

Why Bio-coal?  EU Climate & Energy Package  Reduce GHG emissions by 2020  Secure inland energy sources (inland biomass)

 Untreated biomass not feasible (i.e. wood pellets)  Enabling technology: co-combustion using bio-coal would be

a fast method of cutting CO2 emissions significantly because…

Coal-fire power plants (black dots)

Helsingin Sanomat 28.10.2010

Torrefaction (roasting or incomplete pyrolysis) at the heart of bio-coal production Energy 0.1 Mass 0.3 Torrefaction gases

Raw Biomass

Energy 1.0 Mass 1.0

Torrefaction T = 220-300 C (inert atmosphere) Heating value increase = 0.9/0.7 = 1.29 29% increase

Torrefied Biomass

Energy 0.9 Mass 0.7

The Composition of Woody Biomass Component

Chemical Formula

Hardwood mass (%)

Softwood mass (%)

Cellulose

(C6H10O5)n

43

43

Hemicellulose

(C5H8O4)n

34

28

[(C9H10O3)(CH3O)0.9-1.7]n

23

29

Lignin

Rate of thermal degradation of the three components of woody biomass cellulose

Torrefaction Regime 220-300 C

Yang H et al., Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis, Fuel 2007

Volatile matter and fixed carbon content of fuels 35

100

Volatile matter (%)

90

70 25

60 50 40

20

30 20

15

10 0

10 wood

sod peat

torrefied wood

Pine wood (T = 285 C, t = ?) Bourgeois & Doat (1984)

coal

wood charcoal

Typical Polish coal used in Finland

higher heating value (MJ/kg)

composition (%)

Fixed carbon (%)

30

80

Ash content (%) Higher heating value (MJ/kg)

Elemental compositional changes

Composition of beech wood and torrefeed beech wood (T= 220-280C) in van Kravelen diagram Prins et al. More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction (2006)

Torrefaction versus carbonisation Heating value, as received 1000

= 10 MJ

Mass balance – 1 kg of wood

900

Pelletointiraja (ligniini ei riittää) Limit of pelletisation

800

(lignin decomposition)

700 600

g

500

tuhka N O

9 MJ

400

H

300

C

6 MJ

200 100 0

Wood hake chips

torrefioitu puu Torrefied wood

Woodpuuhiili charcoal

Extent of pyrolysis

H20

Bio-coal production is an optimisation problem Minimise Reaction time Reactor size Process complexity Investment expenses

Maximise Raw material particle size Ability to pelletise/briquette Heat transfer Use of torrefaction gas Grindability of product

Bio-coal versus conventional wood pellets

Wood pellets

∆E = 10%

Bio-coal

Torrefaction technology developers in Europe

Kiel J,Torrefaction for upgrading biomass into commodity fuel, 2011.

Are the expectations of bio-coal realistic = based on scientific findings? Key Property

Popular Claim

Experimental Data*

Mass/Energy Balance

70/90% 29% heating value increase

61-82/73-92% 7-21% (woody) 7-15% (agro)

Grindability

Same as fossil coal 7-36 kWh/t

Improved, grinding energy reduced 68-89% (reactivity?) 52-150 kWh/t

Equilibrium Moisture Content (ECM)

Hydrophobic or 3-6% max.

2.2% (RH 11.3%) 8.7% (RH 83.6%) Measured at 30 degrees C

*Experimental data from peer-reviewed scientific journal publications. Agar D, Wihersaari M. Bio-coal, torrefied lignocellulosic resources – key properties for its use in co-firing with fossil coal – their status, Biomass & Bioenergy (2012).

Conclusions  Bio-coal is a fossil coal substitute for coal-fired power plants  Potential to cut CO2 emissions significantly from energy sector  Torrefaction is a distinct thermal regime in which mostly

hemicellulose undergoes degradation (220-300 C)  Bio-coal production is an optimisation problem and is not trivial  Three key properties of bio-coal are available from recent peerreviewed literature for modelling of economics and GHGemission balance.

Nordic Environmental Chemistry Conference, Kakskerta,Turku, 4-7 June, 2012

Thank You For your attention David Agar1 Margareta Wihersaari2 1 Department

of Chemistry 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä