Chromatographic Separation of Puberty Accelerating Pheromone from ...

5 downloads 0 Views 632KB Size Report
THOMAS. A. KOST. Department of Microbiology,. N. C. State. University,. Raleigh, ..... (Lowry et al.,. 1951). In addition,. Fraction. B was tested for the presence.
BIOLOGY

OF

REPRODUCTION

15,

Chromatographic

260-265

(1976)

Separation

of Puberty Male

JOHN

Mouse G.

of Mental

Research North S.

Health,

Carolina

FINLAYSON

Bureau of Biologics, and Drug Administration,

Food

Bethesda,

J.

from

Division,

Raleigh,

WALTER

Pheromone

VANDENBERGH

N. C. Department

J.

Accelerating Urine1

DOBROGOSZ,

Maryland

STEVEN

Department

S.

of

N.

State

C.

Raleigh,

DILLS

and

THOMAS

A.

KOST

Microbiology, University,

North

Carolina

ABSTRACT Dialysis and sequential ultrafiltration were used to separate urine from adult male mice into a number of fractions, all of which proved to be capable of accelerating the sexual maturation of female mice. Chromatography of the lowest molecular weight fraction on Sephadex G-15 yielded several fractions, only one of which was active. The active fraction was eluted at a position corresponding to a molecular weight of 860. It contained no detectable steroids but gave a strong positive test peptides.

for

Vandenbergh,

INTRODUCTION The is

rate

of

sexual

accelerated

(Vandenbergh, presence

other

on

the

increased of

pubertal adult

Bronson

within

male

(Bronson

and

produced

of by

by urine

a

The

puberty

exposure male

by

circulating four-fold

after

in to

females

(Vandenbergh, and

Wise,

Accepted May 11, 1976. Received March 16, 1976. ‘We thank Carol Bradley for bioassay procedure. This work Public Health Grant MH 16870 Institute of Mental Health to JGV.

can

Colby

or

al., the

1975). active

it of

Further component

to

iso-

accelerating is

associated male

urine

progress in

urine

in is

here.

AND

METHODS

Bioassay

be

The procedure for assaying the activity of urinary fractions depends upon the detection of uterine hypertrophy coincident with the onset of estrus cyclicity. The procedure has been described in detail previously (Vandenbergh et al., 1975). In brief, it

material 1969)

1972;

that

component et

of

steps for

to 1973;

bedding

indicated

MATERIALS

in

exposure Stetson,

responsible

protein

isolation

reported

1974).

early

(Cowley

h and

the

ef-

mediated since

the

(Vandenbergh

al.,

acceleratory

rise

4

the et

pheromone puberty

with

Preliminary

1974).

the

female

male

by

(Vandenhergh

apparently

Desjardins,

mice a

inhibited

hormone

females

female of

activity

luteinizing

Induction

male

is

hypophyseal

levels

soiled

and

1974). female

in

presence

females

Drickamer,

fect

an

the

1967) of

1972;

maturation

by

late

by

Procedure

employs female albino mice (Mus musculus) of the Swiss Webster strain born in the laboratory and reared under standardized conditions of food, water, caging, photoperiod, humidity, and litter size. Females are weaned and individually caged at 21 days of age. Beginning at 28 days of age and for 8 consecutive days thereafter, 0.05 ml of a control or test substance is applied directly to each female’s oro-nasal groove daily. At 36 days of age females are killed and their uteri are removed and weighed.

and

assistance with the was supported by from the National

260

PUBERTY

Dialysis

ACCELERATING

Procedure

this

In

Exp. I, 16 ml of urine was collected from 20 adult male stud mice by gentle massage of the bladder, pooled, sterilized by filtration through a Millipore Swinnex filter with a 0.45 m pore size, and divided into two equal fractions. One fraction was stored for 4 days at 5#{176}C and the other 8 ml was dialysed against 40 ml distilled water at 5#{176}C for 48 h with one change of water. Both the dialysate and retentate were freezedried and reconstituted to the original 8 ml quantity with distilled water. Thus, from the original urine collected we were able to test whole urine as well as the retentate and dialysate after dialysis and freezedrying.

Ultrafiltration

Procedure

In

Exp. II, 24 ml of urine was collected from 20 adult male stud mice and filtered as described above. The urine was further clarified by cen trifugation at 5000 X g for 10 mm at 4#{176}C prior to ultrafiltration using a RC2 Refrigerated Sorval Centrifuge with an SS1 Rotor. The supernatant fluid was filtered by means of an Amicon 202 stirred ultrafiltration cell equipped with Amicon series UM ultrafiltration membranes. The operating pressure for all filtration was 55 psi. Each retentate was washed with 10 ml distilled water. The urine was initially filtered through a UM1O membrane, general retentivity greater than 10,000 molecular weight. The filtrate was collected and filtered through a UM2 membrane, general resensitivity greater than 1,000 molecular weight. The filtrate was again collected and filtered through a UMO5 membrane, general retentivity greater than 500 molecular weight. The filtrate passing the UM1O membrane and each of the filtrates (including the wash) were freeze-dried and stored until tested. Prior to delivery to females each fraction was reconstituted with 6 ml distilled water to return it to the original concentration found in whole male urine.

Chromato

graphic

Procedure

In

Exp. III, 30 ml urine was collected from 20 adult male stud mice and processed as described under the ultrafiltration procedure. An aliquot of the UMO5 filtrate was retained for testing and the remainder was lyophilized and reconstituted to a volume of 3 ml with 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 7.8. The sample was applied to a 75 X 1.5 cm column packed with G-15 Sephadex (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals) which had been equilibrated with 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate. The column was developed at room temperature with

TABLE

PHEROMONE

1. Standard

compounds

used

to estimate

molecular

same

solution.

261

A

flow

rate

of

1.5

mI/mm

For

estimation

of the

molecular

weight

of

Fraction

B (Fig. 2) several standards were chromatographed. The void volume of the column, approximately 40 ml, was indicated by the elution volume of blue dextran (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals) and cytochrome c (Sigma Chemicals), which emerged at the same position. The standards (Table 1) together with Fraction B were passed through the column and the elution volumes were measured. The log, molecular weight was plotted vs. effluent volume to obtain a standard curve. The molecular weight of Fraction B was then estimated from the graph. Selected fractions from each of the procedures described above were analysed for total protein (Lowry et al., 1951). In addition, Fraction B was tested for the presence of steroids by the hot sulfuric acid reaction and by the 10 percent phosphomolybdic acid reaction in ethanol (Edwards, 1969). Fraction B was also subjected to two-dimensional paper chromatography by the following procedure: 25 MI of Fraction B was spotted on one corner of a 21 X 21 cm sheet of Whatman 31 ET paper and chromatographed in an ascending manner in two phases. In phase one, phenol saturated with H2 0 in the presence of 3 percent ammonia was used with a 4.5 h development time. The chromatograph was dried overnight and rinsed three times with ether. In phase two, n-butanol:HCOOH:H20 (100:30: 25) was used with a development time of 2 h. The chromatograph was then dried and sprayed with ninhydrin and aniline phosphate.

weight

of Fraction

B.

Molecular Compound

Cytochrome

c

Bacitracin NADH Glutathione

(reduced)

was

achieved by the use of a peristaltic pump. Fractions of 2 ml were collected and absorbance was measured at 280 nm using a Beckman DU spectrophotometer. On the basis of the elution pattern obtained (Fig. 1) fractions were combined into two pools (I and II) representing the major peaks and a third pool (III) consisting of material eluted later. The fractions were pooled, lyophilized, and reconstituted to half the original urine volume with distilled water. This doubling of presumed concentration was thought necessary to compensate for losses during the procedure. In Exp. IV, a similar quantity of urine was processed as described for Exp. Ill; however, only the fractions indicated on Fig. 2 were prepared for bioassay. Those tested were Fractions B, C, D (i.e., subdivisions of Fraction I, which proved active in Exp. Ill); Fraction E, which was eluted just after the latter; Fraction A, which comprised all fractions collected prior to Fraction B, including those representing the void volume; and a recombined fraction made up of equal volumes of Fractions A through E.

weight

Source

12,400 1,450 665 307

Schwarz-Mann Schwarz-Mann Sigma Chemical Sigma Chemical

Biochemicals Biochemicals

Company Company

VANDENBERGH

262 TABLE 2. Mean body weight rated by dialysis or membrane

and uterine filtration.

weight

ET

of female

AL.

mice

after

Bo dy wt.

Experiment

N

5

14 14 14 14

18.3 18.5 18.2 17.9

13 13 13 13

Fjltrate-UMO5 Water ANOVAb different

from

experiment

bwithmfl

water

analysis

Bioassay of plus the retentate

urine and

urine induced

I revealed hypertrophy

in

Exp. uterine

used

as

a

controls

of variance

weight induced

by

that

of to

filtration uterine

The

results

and dialysate fractions that the pheromone

of

a large and

being

assumption be expected

the

and

molecule, was

filtrate

is

9.31a 19.60 12.59a 3.39

molecular was then

the

volume, contained the other fractions in uterine weight major

10.89

8.45a 11.25 2.08

the i.e.,

fraction viz.,

were

before

and

tively) equal

and peak

(Vanto the

Fraction

D,

compared

after

the

and

Fig.

Fraction

I (A

indicated found

was

of by

in the

in-

original

(Filtrate-UMO

recombined

after

in Fraction eluted after

B, which the void

was the volume.

Using standards of (Table 1) chromatographed of

E, respec-

sample consisting A through E.

chromatographed

weight

eluted

and

material

molecular

tested.

material

as

weight

narrower

2) were

with

activity

uterine

noted

in

C, and

and a recombined volumes of Fractions

substance

in

repeated

was

(B,

These

creased

(Exp. I, Table bound to or

12,000

known this

5),

separation,

first

discrete

molecular with Fraction

fraction

was

weight B the estimated

molecular released.

the in its

If

I (Fig.

‘III’

25 11

molecular to about

1?

chromatogthe compo-

after

the

activity 1 and

Table

ii

void

(Table 3). None of significant changes with water. Once

containing

II



24

membrane.

lowest those up

I

28

pheromone purest form

UMO5

eluted

activity induced compared

experiment

subfractions

filtrate (Fig. 1). Bioassay of (Exp. Ill) revealed that only first

data.

was

over

the

P