Catphan® phantom images where acquired with a 64 slices computed tomography system, with head and abdomen protocols. Automatic exposure modulation ...
Computed Tomography quality indexes: evaluation experience. Sabina Strocchi1*, Cristina Vite1, Raffaele Novario2, Marco Cacciatori3, Giovanna Frigerio3, Leopoldo Conte2 1
Department of Medical Physics, “Ospedale di Circolo e Fond. Macchi” Hospital, Varese, Italy Insubria University, Varese, Italy 3 Department of Medical Physics, “Sant’ Anna” Hospital, Como, Italy 2
ABSTRACT Aim of this work was to identify proper figures of merit (FoM’s) to quantitatively and objectively assess the whole acquisition process of a CT image and to evaluate which are more significant. Catphan® phantom images where acquired with a 64 slices computed tomography system, with head and abdomen protocols. Automatic exposure modulation system was on, with different settings. We defined three FoM’s (Q, Q1 and Q2) including image quality parameters and acquisition modalities; two of them (Q and Q1) include also a radiation dose quantity, the third (Q2) does not. Then we drew from these the comparable FoM’s (CNR, Q1*, Q2), that do not have dose in their definitions, in order to investigate how they depend on perceived image quality. The FoM’s were evaluated for each series. At the same time, expert observers evaluated the number of low contrast inserts seen in the phantom’ images. The considered CNR, Q1*, Q2 FoM’s are linearly related to the perceived image quality for both the acquisition protocols (head: r2=0.91;0.94;0.91; abdomen: r2=0.93;0.93;0.85). Q and Q1 values analysis shows that these FoM’s can distinguish between different acquisition modalities (head or abdomen) with statistically significant difference (p
