Conjugated Polymers Containing BODIPY and Fluorene Units for

polymers Article

Conjugated Polymers Containing BODIPY and Fluorene Units for Sensitive Detection of CN− Ions: Site-Selective Synthesis, Photo-Physical and Electrochemical Properties Tian He † , Danting Tang † , Cuiling Lin, Xi Shen, Chenjie Lu, Luonan Xu, Zhengye Gu, Zheng Xu, Huayu Qiu, Qian Zhang * and Shouchun Yin * College of Material Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China; [email protected] (T.H.); [email protected] (D.T.); [email protected] (C.Li.); [email protected] (X.S.); [email protected] (C.Lu); [email protected] (L.X.); [email protected] (Z.G.); [email protected] (Z.X.); [email protected] (H.Q.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (S.Y.); Tel.: +86 57128867897 (Q.Z. & S.Y.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 11 September 2017; Accepted: 10 October 2017; Published: 14 October 2017

Abstract: Conjugated polymers containing distinct molecular units are expected to be very interesting because of their unique properties endowed by these units and the formed conjugated polymers. Herein, four new conjugated copolymers based on fluorene and 4,4’-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) have been designed and synthesized via Sonogashira polymerization. The fluorene unit was attached to the 3,5- or 2,6-positions of BODIPY by ethynylenes or p-diacetylenebenzene. The obtained polymers show good thermal stability and broad absorption in the wavelength range from 300 to 750 nm. The effects of site-selective copolymerization and conjugation length along the polymer backbone on the optoelectronic and electrochemical properties of these copolymers were systematically studied by UV-Vis spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL) and cyclic voltammetry. Besides, it is found that the BODIPY-based copolymers exhibit selectively sensitive responses to cyanide anions, resulting in obvious change of UV-Vis absorption spectra and significant fluorescence quenching of the polymers among various common anions. Keywords: BODIPY; conjugated copolymers; site-selective; cyanide anion

1. Introduction 4,4-Difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) derivatives have been widely investigated in the fields of chemical sensors, solar cells, biological labeling, photodynamic therapy and nonlinear optical materials because of its unique advantages of high chemical and photo-stability, high extinction coefficients and fluorescence quantum yields, and narrow absorption and emission bands [1–11]. More interestingly, its optical properties could be effectively tuned by functionalizing BODIPY cores at the 2,6-, or 3,5-positions, or fusing some aromatic rings to the BODIPY core [1–5,12]. Incorporation of BODIPY dyes into the backbone of conjugated polymers is expected to integrate the unique properties of both BODIPY and conjugated polymers into one material for various potential applications, but the reports are limited [3,13–18]. Besides, much less attention has been paid to studying the effects of site-selective polymerization on their optoelectronic properties [19,20]. Polyfluorene and its derivatives have been distinguishing light-emitting materials owing to their highly efficient photoluminescence and electroluminescence, excellent thermal and chemical stability, good solubility and film-forming properties [21–28]. Previous studies demonstrated that Polymers 2017, 9, 512; doi:10.3390/polym9100512

www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers

Polymers Polymers 2017, 2017, 9, 9, 512 512

22 of of 14 14

stability, good solubility and film-forming properties [21–28]. Previous studies demonstrated that incorporation of suitable narrow bandgap chromophores into the side chain or main chain of wide incorporation of suitable narrow bandgap chromophores into the side chain or main chain of wide bandgap polyfluorene hosts could realize red and green emitters [25,29]. Based on these, incorporation bandgap polyfluorene hosts could realize red and green emitters [25,29]. Based on these, of BODIPY into polyfluorene backbone is expected to obtain a fluorescent conjugated polymer with incorporation of BODIPY into polyfluorene backbone is expected to obtain a fluorescent conjugated excellent optical properties. polymer with excellent optical properties. Herein, we have designed and synthesized four novel BODIPY-fluorene alternating copolymers Herein, we have designed and synthesized four novel BODIPY-fluorene alternating copolymers (Scheme 1). Polymers P1 and P3 were synthesized by the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction in, which (Scheme 1). Polymers P1 and P3 were synthesized by the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction in, fluorenes were attached to the 2,6- or 3,5- positions of BODIPY units through an ethynylene bridge, which fluorenes were attached to the 2,6- or 3,5- positions of BODIPY units through an ethynylene respectively. For comparison, polymers P2 and P4 with fluorene and BODIPY connected through bridge, respectively. For comparison, polymers P2 and P4 with fluorene and BODIPY connected a p-diacetylenebenzene bridge were also obtained. The effect of different connectivity on the BODIPY through a p-diacetylenebenzene bridge were also obtained. The effect of different connectivity on the cores and conjugation length along the polymer backbone on the optoelectronic and electrochemical BODIPY cores and conjugation length along the polymer backbone on the optoelectronic and properties of these copolymers was systematically investigated. Interestingly, these copolymers could electrochemical properties of these copolymers was systematically investigated. Interestingly, these selectively exhibit response to CN− , as demonstrated−by the significant change of UV-Vis absorption copolymers could selectively exhibit response to CN , as demonstrated by the significant change of and fluorescence spectra among various common anions. UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra among various common anions.

Scheme 1. Chemical structures of polymers P1, P2, P3 and P4. Scheme 1. Chemical structures of polymers P1, P2, P3 and P4.

2. Materials and 2. Materials and Methods Methods 2.1. Materials 2.1. Materials Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers, and used Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers, and used without further purification. 1-ethynyl-4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene, 4,4'-difluoro-3,5-dibromo-8without further purification. 1-ethynyl-4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene, 4,4'-difluoro-3,5-dibromo(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M1), 2,7-ethynyl-9,9-dioctylfluorene (M1’), 4,4’-difluoro8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M1), 2,7-ethynyl-9,9-dioctylfluorene (M1’), 4,4’-difluoro1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M-BODIPY) and 4,4’-difluoro-2,61,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M-BODIPY) and 4,4’-difluoro-2,6diiodo-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M3) were synthesized according to diiodo-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M3) were synthesized the literature [20,30]. Anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from sodium/benzophenoneketyl according to the literature [20,30]. Anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from prior to use. Triethylamine (Et3 N) was distilled from potassium hydroxide prior to use. sodium/benzophenoneketyl prior to use. Triethylamine (Et3N) was distilled from potassium hydroxide prior to use. 2.2. Instruments 1

H NMR spectra (500 MHz) in CDCl3 were recorded on a Bruker Advance 500 (Bruker, Fällanden 2.2. Instruments Switzerland) at 298 K and referenced to tetramethylsilane (0.00 ppm) as an internal standard. 13 C NMR 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz) in CDCl3 were recorded on a Bruker Advance 500 (Bruker, Fällanden spectra (125 MHz) in CDCl3 were referenced to the CDCl3 (77.16 ppm) signal. Mass spectra were Switzerland) at 298 K and referenced to tetramethylsilane (0.00 ppm) as an internal standard. 13C recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 5989 A mass spectrometer (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) NMR spectra (125 MHz) in CDCl3 were referenced to the CDCl3 (77.16 ppm) signal. Mass spectra perated in electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. High-resolution mass data were obtained with a MS50TC were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 5989 A mass spectrometer (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, instrument (Kratos, Manchester, UK). Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were recorded USA) perated in electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. High-resolution mass data were obtained with on a Lambda 750 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and fluorescence a MS50TC instrument (Kratos, Manchester, UK). Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra spectra were recorded on a F-7000 spectrofluorometer (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform were recorded on a Lambda 750 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and fluorescence spectra were recorded on a F-7000 spectrofluorometer (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan).

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

3 of 14

infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 5700 spectrometer (Thermo fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) in the 400–4000 cm−1 region. The molecular weights of the polymers were determined using polystyrene as the standard by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) with a Waters Associates liquid chromatograph (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a Waters 515 pump, a Wyatt injector with a stand kit, a CBL Model 200 column heater, a Wyatt Optilab T-rEx differential refractometer. All polymers were firstly dissolved in THF (ca. 4 mg/mL), and, before being injected into the GPC system, the solutions were filtered through 0.45 µm Poly tetra-fluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe-type filters. THF was the eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 . The column temperature was kept at 35 ◦ C. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) were performed on a LK2005A electrochemical work station (Lanlike, Tianjin, China) at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 . All CV measurements were carried out in dry THF with tetrabutylammonium phosphorus hexafluoride (Bu4 NPF6 , 0.1 M) as the supporting electrolyte at room temperature and using a conventional three-electrode configuration with a glassy carbon electrode as the working electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, and a Pt wire as the counter electrode. 2.3. Synthesis 2.3.1. Synthesis of Monomers 4,4’-difluoro-3,5-(4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)phenylethynyl)-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (1): 4,4’-difluoro-3,5-dibromo-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (438 mg, 1 mmol) and 1-ethynyl-4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene (495 mg, 2.5 mmol) were dissolved in the mixture of THF (150 mL) and Et3 N (800 µL) under argon. Then PdCl2 (PPh3 )2 (35 mg, 0.05 mmol) and CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol) were added to this solution. After stirring at 60 ◦ C for 10 h, the reaction mixture was poured into water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2 Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was washed with water for twice and dried over anhydrous Na2 SO4 for 3 h. The solvent was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. Then the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/CH2 Cl2 (2:1, v/v) as eluent to give blue solid 1 (480 mg, 50.4% yield). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm–1 ): 2924, 2854 (CH3 ), 2201, 2156 (C≡C), 1609, 1588, 1410, 862 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.62 (d, 4H, J = 8.2 HZ ), 7.49 (d, 4H), 7.44 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 HZ ), 7.33 (d, 2H), 6.89 (d, 2H, J = 4.3 HZ ), 6.72 (d, 2H), 2.47 (s, 3H, Ar–CH3 ), 0.28 (s, 18H, Si(CH3 )3 ). 4,4’-difluoro-3,5-(4-(ethynyl)phenylethynyl)-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (M2): 100 µL tetrabutylammonium fluoride solution (1.0 mol L−1 in THF) was added into the solution of 1 (67 mg, 0.1 mmol) in THF (20 mL) at −78 ◦ C under argon. After stirring for 15 min, the reaction mixture was poured into water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2 Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was washed with water for twice and then dried over anhydrous Na2 SO4 for 3 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether/CH2 Cl2 (1:1, v/v) as eluent to afford dark blue solid M2 (33 mg, 62.2% yield). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 3294 (≡C–H), 2962, 2925, 2853 (CH3 ), 2202, 2157 (C≡C), 1610, 1568, 1537, 860 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.65 (d, 4H, J = 8.5 HZ ), 7.52 (d, 4H), 7.44 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 HZ ), 7.33 (d, 2H), 6.90 (d, 2H, J = 4.1 HZ ), 6.73 (d, 2H), 3.24 (s, 2H, C≡CH), 2.47 (s, 3H, Ar–CH3 ). 13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 142.7, 141.2, 137.4, 136.9, 132.2, 132.1, 131.0, 130.7, 130.5, 129.2, 123.8, 123.2, 122.8, 101.8, 85.0 (C≡C), 83.3 (HC≡C), 79.7 (HC≡), 29.7 (CH3 ). ESI–MS: m/z 511.3 [M-F]− . HRMS [M-F]− : calcd. for C36 H21 BFN2 511.3747, found 511.3698. 4,4’-difluoro-2,6-(4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)phenylethynyl)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (2): M3 (590 mg, 1 mmol) and 1-ethynyl-4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene (495 mg, 2.5 mmol) were dissolved in 150 mL of THF and 800 µL of Et3 N under argon. Then PdCl2 (PPh3 )2 (35 mg, 0.05 mmol) and CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol) were added to this solution. After stirring at 60 ◦ C for 10 h, the reaction mixture was poured into water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2 Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was washed with water for twice and dried over anhydrous Na2 SO4 for 3 h. The solvent was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

4 of 14

chromatography with petroleum ether/CH2 Cl2 (1:1, v/v) as eluent to give orange solid 2 (465 mg, 63.7% yield). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 2938, 2849 (CH3 ), 2214, 2135 (C≡C), 1629, 1566, 1390, 823 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.43 (d, 4H, J = 8.4 HZ ), 7.39 (d, 4H), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 HZ ), 7.18 (d, 2H), 2.73 (s, 6H), 2.49 (s, 3H, Ar–CH3 ), 1.56 (s, 6H), 0.27 (s, 18H, Si(CH3 )3 ). 4,4-difluoro-2,6-(4-(ethynyl)phenylethynyl)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-(4-tolyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-sindacene (M4): 100 µL of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.0 mol L−1 in THF) was added into the solution of 2 (73 mg, 0.1 mmol) in THF (20 mL) at –78 ◦ C under argon. After stirring for 15 min, the reaction mixture was poured into water (50 mL) and extracted with CH2 Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was washed with water for twice and then dried over anhydrous Na2 SO4 for 3 h. The solvent was removed by evaporation under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography with petroleum ether/CH2 Cl2 (1:1, v/v) as eluent to give orange solid M4 (40 mg, 68.1% yield). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 3312 (≡C–H), 2958, 2931, 2848 (CH3 ), 2199, 2101 (C≡C), 1623, 1549, 1516, 871 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.46 (d, 4H, J = 8.3 HZ ), 7.42 (d, 4H), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 7.9 HZ ), 7.18 (d, 2H), 3.19 (s, 2H, C≡CH), 2.74 (s, 6H), 2.50 (s, 3H, Ar-CH3 ), 1.57 (s, 6H). 13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ) δ (ppm): 158.4, 147.1, 144.3, 143.2, 139.5, 132.1, 131.1, 130.1, 127.6, 124.5, 3 123.9, 121.7, 119.1, 96.0, 83.8 (C≡C), 83.3 (HC≡C), 78.9 (HC≡), 22.7, 21.5 (Ar–CH3 ), 13.5. ESI–MS: m/z 567.4 [M-F]− . HRMS [M-F]− : calcd. for C40 H29 BFN2 567.2457, found 567.2446. 2.3.2. Polymerization of Monomers Synthesis of P2: A solution of M2 (51 mg, 0.1 mmol), 9,9-dioctyl-2,7-dibromofluorene (M2’) (55 mg, 0.1 mmol) and CuI (0.95 mg, 0.005 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) and Et3 N (1 mL) was degassed twice with nitrogen following the addition of Pd(PPh3 )4 (3.56 mg, 0.005 mmol). After refluxing for 48 h under the protection of nitrogen, the reaction mixture was concentrated to 2 mL. Forty milliliters of methanol was added to the solution and stirred for 4 hours to precipitate the polymer. The precipitate was centrifuged and redissolved in THF (2 mL). Then the polymer was reprecipitated by dropwise adding the solution to 40 mL of methanol. The dissolution-reprecipitation operation was redone three times, and the resulted polymer was dried in vacuum oven at 45 ◦ C for 24 hours as a dark blue solid (27.6 mg) in 31.1% yield. Mw = 12.4 × 103 ; Mw /Mn = 2.0 (GPC, polystyrene calibration). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 2932, 2854 (CH3 ), 2199 (C≡C), 1547, 1252, 1159, 1034, 814 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.68–7.21 (br, Ar–H), 7.05–6.34 (br, H of BODIPY ring), 2.39 (br, CH3 linked at 8 position of BODIPY), 1.87 (br, CH2 linked at 8 position of Fluorene), 1.42–1.03 (br, CH2 of alkyl), 0.84 (br, CH3 of alkyl). Synthesis of P1: P1 was synthesized from monomers M1 and M1’ according to the procedure for preparing P2 as a dark solid in 38.7% yield. Mw = 10.7 × 103 ; Mw /Mn = 1.9 (GPC, polystyrene calibration). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 2927, 2860 (CH3 ), 2184 (C≡C), 1545, 1510, 1470, 1409, 803 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ) δ (ppm): 7.88–7.23 (br, Ar–H), 6.85-6.54 (br, H of BODIPY ring), 2.48 (br, 3 CH3 linked at 8 position of BODIPY), 2.08 (br, CH2 linked at 8 position of fluorene), 1.24–0.99 (br, CH2 of alkyl), 0.80 (br, CH3 of alkyl). Synthesis of P3: P3 was synthesized from monomers M3 and M1’ according to the procedure for preparing P2 as a dark brown solid in 41.8% yield. Mw = 11.8 × 103 ; Mw /Mn = 1.8 (GPC, polystyrene calibration). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 2924, 2853 (CH3 ), 2203 (C≡C), 1530, 1458, 1470, 1189, 821 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ) δ (ppm): 7.76-7.12 (br, Ar–H), 2.77 (br, CH linked at 3, 5 position of 3 3 BODIPY), 2.49 (br, CH3 linked at 8 position of BODIPY), 1.98 (br, CH3 linked at 1, 7 position of BODIPY), 1.28 (br, CH2 linked at 8 position of Fluorene), 1.20–0.98 (br, CH2 of alkyl), 0.77 (br, CH3 of alkyl). Synthesis of P4: P4 was synthesized from monomers M4 and M2’ according to the procedure for preparing P2 as a dark solid in 33.8% yield. Mw = 13.3 × 103 ; Mw /Mn = 2.0 (GPC, polystyrene calibration). FT-IR (KBr), υ (cm−1 ): 2921, 2846 (CH3 ), 2196 (C≡C), 1539, 1375, 1108, 818 (Ar). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ (ppm): 7.54–7.16 (br, Ar–H), 2.69 (br, CH3 linked at 3, 5 position of BODIPY), 2.49 (br, CH3 linked at 8 position of BODIPY), 1.98 (br, CH3 linked at 1, 7 position of BODIPY), 1.55 (br, CH2 linked at 8 position of fluorene), 1.29–1.07 (br, CH2 of alkyl), 0.98 (br, CH3 of alkyl).

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

5 of 14

3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Synthesis and Structural Characterization The synthetic routes to the BODIPY monomers and polymers are shown in Scheme 2. M1 and M3 were synthesized according to the literature. As shown in Scheme 2, monomers M2 and M4 were synthesized from M1 and M3 using the same method, respectively. In the case of M2, the trimethylsilyl protected compound 1 was first conveniently synthesized in 50.4% yield using the Sonogashira coupling of M1 with 1-ethynyl-4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene in the presence of a catalytic amount of Pd(PPh3 )2 Cl2 and CuI with Et3 N. After desilylation with tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF, M2 was obtained in good yield (62.2%). The chemical structures of the final monomers were characterized by 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, FT-IR, ESI–MS and HRMS spectrometry as shown in the Electronic Supplementary Information (Figures S1–S18). The polymerization was then accomplished by Sonogashira coupling reaction of BODIPY derivative monomers with substituted fluorene monomers in ~40% yield (Scheme 2). All the polymers can dissolve in common organic solvents, such as THF, CH2 Cl2 , CHCl3 and toluene. The weight-average molecular weight (Mw ) and polydispersity index (PDI) of the polymers measured by GPC were 10.7 × 103 and 1.9 for P1, 12.4 × 103 and 2.0 for P2, 11.8 × 103 and 1.8 for P3, and 13.3 × 103 and 2.0 for P4, respectively. The structures of the polymers were characterized by 1 H NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 1). In the case of P3, as depicted in the 1 H NMR spectra, a characteristic absorption singlet peak at δ Polymers 2017, 9, 512 7 of 14 3.19 ppm assigned to the acetylene proton of M1’ completely disappeared in the spectrum of P3. Besides, the resonance peaks of P3 were broader than those of the monomers M3 and M1’, due in Besides, the resonance peaks of P3 were broader than those of the monomers M3 and M1’, due in part to their longer rotational correlation times. These results indicate that the acetyl triple bonds of part to their longer rotational correlation times. These results indicate that the acetyl triple bonds of M3’ have been completely involved in the polymerization. The FT-IR spectra of monomers and P3 M3’ have been completely involved in the polymerization. The FT-IR spectra of monomers and P3 are shown in Figure 1b. As shown in Figure 1b, monomer M1’ displayed the characteristic ≡C–H are shown in Figure 1b. As shown in Figure 1b, monomer M1’ displayed the characteristic C–H stretching vibrations at 3300 cm−−11 . After polymerization, the characteristic ≡C–H stretching vibration stretching vibrations at 3300 cm . After polymerization, the characteristic C–H stretching vibration −1 was completely disappeared, and the characteristic C≡C stretching vibrations at 2110 cm shifted −1 was shifted to completely−disappeared, and the characteristic CC stretching vibrations at 2110 cm 1 to 2203 cm in the spectrum of P3, which further proved the efficient coupling reaction and the 2203 cm−1 in the spectrum of P3, which further proved the efficient coupling reaction and the successful preparation of the target polymer. The same results can be obtained by comparing the preparation of the target polymer. The same results can be obtained by comparing the 1H 1successful H NMR and FT-IR spectra of other monomers with their corresponding polymers presented in the ESI. NMR and FT-IR spectra of other monomers with their corresponding polymers presented in the ESI. (b)

(a)

M3

M3

P3

P3

M1' M1' ≡C‒H 8

7

6

5

4

3

Chemical Shift / ppm

2

1

0

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

Wavenumber / cm

1000

500

-1

Figure 1. 1. 11H spectra (b) (b) of of monomers monomers (M1’ (M1’ and and M3) M3) and and polymer polymer P3. P3. Figure H NMR NMR spectra spectra (a); (a); and and FT-IR FT-IR spectra

3.2. Thermal Properties The thermal stability of these polymers were investigated by thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA) at the heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. As shown in Figure 2, the decomposition temperature (Td) of 5% weight loss for P1, P2, P3 and P4 were 329, 303, 334 and 324 °C, respectively, which indicated that the obtained polymers have good thermal stability, and could provide a desirable thermal property for opto-electronic materials. Besides, it could be found that P3 and P4 showed better thermal stability than P1 and P2, respectively, which may be due to the existence of more effective electron delocalization in the polymerization at the 3,5 positions than that at the 2,6 positions. Moreover, the incorporation of p-diacetylenebenzene into the polymer main chain led to poorer thermal stability of the polymer by comparing P1 with P2 or P3 with P4.

Polymers 2017, 9, 512 Polymers 2017, 9, 512

6 of 14 6 of 14

Scheme Scheme 2. 2. Synthetic Syntheticroutes routes for for monomers monomers (M2 (M2 and and M4) M4) and and polymers polymers (P1, (P1, P2, P2, P3 P3 and and P4). P4).

The structures of the polymers were characterized by 1H NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 1). In the case of P3, as depicted in the 1H NMR spectra, a characteristic absorption singlet peak at δ 3.19 ppm assigned to the acetylene proton of M1’ completely disappeared in the spectrum of P3.

M1' M1' ≡C‒H 8

7

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

4000

3500

Chemical Shift / ppm

3000

2500

2000

1500

Wavenumber / cm

1000

500

-1

7 of 14

Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (a); and FT-IR spectra (b) of monomers (M1’ and M3) and polymer P3.

3.2. Thermal Properties 3.2. Thermal Properties The thermal stability of these polymers were investigated by thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA) −1 under The thermal these polymers were investigated by in thermal analyzer at the heating ratestability of 10 ◦ Cof min N2 atmosphere. As shown Figuregravimetric 2, the decomposition −1 under N2 atmosphere. As shown in◦ Figure 2, the (TGA) at the heating rate of 10 °C min temperature (Td ) of 5% weight loss for P1, P2, P3 and P4 were 329, 303, 334 and 324 C, respectively, decomposition (Td) ofpolymers 5% weight loss for thermal P1, P2, P3 and P4and were 329,provide 303, 334 and 324 which indicatedtemperature that the obtained have good stability, could a desirable °C, respectively, which indicated that the obtained polymers have good thermal and could thermal property for opto-electronic materials. Besides, it could be found thatstability, P3 and P4 showed provide a desirable thermal property for opto-electronic materials. Besides, it could be found that P3 better thermal stability than P1 and P2, respectively, which may be due to the existence of more and P4 showed thermal in stability than P1 andatP2, which may be 2,6 due to the effective electronbetter delocalization the polymerization the respectively, 3,5 positions than that at the positions. existence more effective electron delocalization in into the polymerization at chain the 3,5led positions than that Moreover,ofthe incorporation of p-diacetylenebenzene the polymer main to poorer thermal at the 2,6 positions. Moreover, the incorporation of p-diacetylenebenzene into the polymer main chain stability of the polymer by comparing P1 with P2 or P3 with P4. led to poorer thermal stability of the polymer by comparing P1 with P2 or P3 with P4. P1 P2 P3 P4

Weght residue / %

100

90

80

70

60 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

o

Temperature / C Figure Figure2.2.TGA TGAcurves curvesof ofthe thepolymers polymers(P1, (P1,P2, P2,P3 P3and andP4). P4).

3.3. Optical Properties 3.3. Optical Properties The normalized absorption spectra of all the BODIPY monomers and polymers in dilute THF The normalized absorption spectra of all the BODIPY monomers and polymers in dilute THF solution and thin films are shown in Figure 3, and the optical data are summarized in Table 1. From solution and thin films are shown in Figure 3, and the optical data are summarized in Table 1. From Figure 3, in THF solution, M1 showed a strong S0 –S1 (π–π*) transition with a maximum at 519 nm and a weak broad band around 365 nm ascribed to the S0 –S2 (π–π*) transition, characteristic of the typical absorption spectrum of a BODIPY chromophore. When attached to the 3,5 positions of BODIPY with two p-diacetylenebenzene units, the absorption peaks of M2 were red-shifted by 84 nm compared with that of M1, due to the increased π-conjugation. Similarly, the absorption maxima of M4 exhibited a bathochromic shift of 39 nm in comparison with that of M3. After polymerization, the absorption peak of P1 red-shifted to 550–610 nm, and the absorbance of P1 at 350–500 nm was apparently larger than that of M1. Similarly, compared to the absorption spectra of their respective BODIPY monomers, other copolymers also showed broad absorption in the wavelength range from 300 to 750 nm with red-shifted and broader absorption peaks, due to the significant extended conjugation length of polymer backbone and the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from fluorene to BODIPY. In addition, the absorption spectra of both P2 and P4 possessed a vibronic shoulder peak at ~660 nm, which imply the existence of ordered aggregation and strong π–π stacking in solution [31]. In solid films, the absorption spectra of all the monomers and polymers exhibited red shifts and broader peaks relative to their corresponding solution absorption, indicative of strong interactions. For example, the spectrum of M1 was broadened and red-shifted with a peak at 580 nm. After polymerization, the polymers presented broader and red-shifted absorption peaks in contrast to the BODIPY monomers. In addition, in Table 1, P2 and P4 exhibited bathochromic shifts in comparison with P1 and P3, respectively, because of longer conjugation by the ethynylphenyl group. Moreover, the absorption maxima of P1 and P2 exhibited bathochromic shifts compared to those of P3 and P4,

In solid films, the absorption spectra of all the monomers and polymers exhibited red shifts and broader peaks relative to their corresponding solution absorption, indicative of strong interactions. For example, the spectrum of M1 was broadened and red-shifted with a peak at 580 nm. After polymerization, the polymers presented broader and red-shifted absorption peaks in contrast to the Polymers 2017, 9, 512 8 of 14 BODIPY monomers. In addition, in Table 1, P2 and P4 exhibited bathochromic shifts in comparison with P1 and P3, respectively, because of longer conjugation by the ethynylphenyl group. Moreover, the absorption maxima of P1 and P2 exhibited bathochromic shifts compared to those of P3 and P4, respectively, which suggested that substitutions at 3,5-positions of BODIPY provided more effective respectively, which suggested that substitutions at 3,5-positions of BODIPY provided more effective π-conjugation than substitutions at 2,6 positions. π-conjugation than substitutions at 2,6 positions. M1-Sol P1-Sol M1-Film P1-Film

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

1.0

Normalized Absorbance


1.0

0.0

M2-Sol P2-Sol M2-Film P2-Film

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0 400

500

600

400

700

500


0.8

700

0.6

0.4

0.2

1.0



1.0

600

800

Wavelength / nm

Wavelength / nm


0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

0.0 400

500

600

Wavelength / nm

700

400

500

600

700

800

Wavelength / nm

Figure 3. 3. Normalized Normalized absorption absorption spectra spectra of of monomers monomers (M1, (M1, M2, M2, M3 M3 and and M4) M4) and andcopolymers copolymers (P1, (P1,P2, P2, Figure P3 and P4) in THF solution and films. P3 and P4) in THF solution and films.

The The emission emission spectra spectra of of monomers monomers and and copolymers copolymers in in THF THF solution solution and and films films are shown shown in Figure Figure 4 and ESI. In Figure 4, the change trends were the same as those of their absorption spectra and and extended extended π-conjugation π-conjugation length length of the copolymers copolymers results in significant bathochromic bathochromic shifts shifts of fluorescence maxima and broader emission peaks compared to their corresponding starting BODIPY their corresponding starting BODIPY monomers (Table 1). In solution, M1 and M3 displayed the maximum emission peaks at ~560 nm, while M2 and M4 blue-shifted to 644 and 607 nm, respectively. After polymerization, the fluorescent spectrum of P1 was broadened and red-shifted with peak at 609 nm. Similarly, the fluorescence spectra of P2, P3 and P4 also showed broadened peaks and red shifts in comparison with those of their corresponding monomers. Besides, from Table 1, it can be seen that P1, P2 and P4 exhibited lower fluorescence quantum yields in comparison with those of BODIPY monomers originated from the ICT excited states, and P3 showed the highest quantum yield with a value of 18.7% among all the polymers. Monomer M3 exhibits very low fluorescence quantum yield compared to other monomers because of the heavy atom effect of iodine substituents. The fluorescence properties of the monomers and polymers in the solid state were then measured (Figure 4b). Compared with those in solution, the emission spectra of the monomers in thin films preserved most of the spectra features and displayed obvious red shifts due to the strong π–π stacking. After polymerization, the fluorescence spectra of the polymers in the thin films were broadened and redshifted because of the extension of conjugation and strong intermolecular interaction.

The fluorescence properties of the monomers and polymers in the solid state were then measured (Figure 4b). Compared with those in solution, the emission spectra of the monomers in thin films preserved most of the spectra features and displayed obvious red shifts due to the strong π–π stacking. After polymerization, the fluorescence spectra of the polymers in the thin films were broadened and Polymers 2017, 9, 512 redshifted because of the extension of conjugation and strong intermolecular 9 of 14 interaction. M1 P1 M2 P2 M3 P3 M4 P4

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

(b) 1.0 Normalized Intensity

Normalized Intensity

(a)

M1 P1 M2 P2 M3 P3 M4 P4

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

0.0 500

550

600

650

700

750

800

500

550

Wavelength / nm

600

650

700

750

800

Wavelength / nm

Figure 4. Normalized fluorescence fluorescence emission emission spectra spectra of of monomers monomers (M1, (M1, M2, M2, M3 M3 and and M4) M4) and and Figure 4. Normalized copolymers (P1, (P1, P2, P2, P3 P3 and and P4) P4) in: in: THF THF (a); (a); and and films films (b). (b). copolymers Table 1. Optical data data of of the the monomers monomers and and copolymers. Table 1. Optical copolymers.

λmax, solλmax,λfilm max, film Compoundλmax, sol Compound (nm) (nm) (nm)(nm)

λem, sol λem, sol (nm) (nm)

Φf f Φ (%) (%)

λem, film λem, film (nm) (nm) 600 600 655 655 673 673 718 718 584 584 656 656 669 725 669 725

M1 519 557 30.4 519 580 580 557 30.4 582 605 605 609 1.9 P1 582 554, 554, 609 1.9 603 646 646 644 47.5 M2 603 644 47.5 604, 654 612, 662 693 10.6 P2 604, 654 612, 662 693 10.6 533 544 562 1.6 M3 533 544 562 1.6 569 575 633 18.7 P3 569 633 18.7 572 610 575 607 37.9 568, 664 572 648 610 618 3.1 M4 607 37.9 P4 568, 664 648 618 3.1 3.4. Electrochemical Properties 3.4. Electrochemical Properties The electrochemical properties of the copolymers were studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV). The + ) of the redox The electrochemical the copolymers were studied by cyclic (CV). The potentials were internallyproperties calibratedofusing the ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fcvoltammetry couple + potentials were internally theand ferrocene/ferrocenium ) of the redox couple (4.8 (4.8 eV below the vacuum calibrated level). Theusing HOMO LUMO energy levels(Fc/Fc were calculated from the onset eV below the vacuum level). The HOMO and LUMO energy levels were calculated from the onset oxidation and reduction potential of the redox curves. The CV curves are shown in Figure S19 and oxidation and reduction redox curves. CV HOMO curves are inenergy Figure levels S19 and the electrochemical data potential are listedof in the Table S1. In TableThe S1, the andshown LUMO of the electrochemical dataand are − listed in Table In Table theeV HOMO LUMO levels of polymers are −5.22 3.36 eV for P1,S1. −5.08 and S1, −3.41 for P2,and −5.14 and energy −3.25 eV for P3, the −5.22eV and eV for P1, −5.08 andP4−3.41 eVhigher for P2,HOMO −5.14 and −3.25 eV for P3, and andpolymers −5.11 andare −3.35 for−3.36 P4, respectively. P2 and show energy levels relative to −5.11 and eV for P4, respectively. P2 and P4 show length higher and HOMO levels relative to P1 P1 and P3,−3.35 respectively, due to the extended conjugation thusenergy stronger electron-donating and P3,P1 respectively, due to the extended conjugation length and electron-donating ability. and P2 show lower LUMO energy levels compared to P3thus andstronger P4, respectively. The band gaps for P1, P2, P3 and P4 are 1.89, 1.67, 1.86 and 1.75 eV, respectively. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were further performed on the corresponding repeating units of the four polymers to gain a better understanding of the electrochemical properties. The frontier molecular orbital energy levels and the corresponding HOMO and LUMO surface plots are shown in Figure 5 and Table S1. The variation trends for molecular orbital energy levels are in accordance with the results obtained from the CV measurements. In Figure 5, the HOMO surfaces are well spread over the whole of the conjugated backbones. Compared with P1 and P3, longer HOMO delocalization length for P2 and P4 would contribute to higher HOMO energy levels. The electron density of the LUMO for P1 and P2 is mainly localized on the BODIPY and adjacent acetylene and benzene, while the LUMO of P3 and P4 is mainly localized on the BODIPY and acetylene units. Compared with P3 and P4, the longer LUMO delocalization length for P1 and P2 would result in lower LUMO energy levels. These results are in concert with the experimental results. The theoretical calculation results indicate that changing the connectivity and conjugation length has great effect on the optical and electrical characteristics. M1 P1 M2 P2 M3 P3 M4 P4

electron density of the LUMO for P1 and P2 is mainly localized on the BODIPY and adjacent acetylene and benzene, while the LUMO of P3 and P4 is mainly localized on the BODIPY and acetylene units. Compared with P3 and P4, the longer LUMO delocalization length for P1 and P2 would result in lower LUMO energy levels. These results are in concert with the experimental results. The theoretical Polymers 2017, results 9, 512 indicate that changing the connectivity and conjugation length has great effect 10 ofon 14 calculation the optical and electrical characteristics. HOMO

LUMO

P1

P2

P3

P4

evaluated at at the the B3LYP/6-31G(d) B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. Figure 5. Frontier molecular orbitals of polymers using DFT evaluated

3.5. 3.5. Sensing Sensing Properties Properties These polymers were were evaluated evaluated for for potential potential responses responses to to anions. anions. The selectivity of polymers These polymers The selectivity of polymers −, Cl−,−Br−, − −, CN −, AcO −, HSO −, H2PO −, NO3− − − − − − − − with F I 4 4 using tetrabutyl-ammonium salts in 20 with F , Cl , Br , I , CN , AcO , HSO4 , H2 PO4 , NO3 using tetrabutyl-ammoniumTHF/H salts in (98:2, v/v) were investigated by UV-Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy, and naked eye colour changes. THF/H 2 0 (98:2, v/v) were investigated by UV-Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy, and naked eye colour Upon the Upon addition 20 equiv. of equiv. variousofanions to anions all the to four in THF/Hin 2OTHF/H (98:2, v/v) changes. the of addition of 20 various allpolymers the four polymers 2O − could − solutions ([RU] = 30 μM), evident changes of the absorption spectra induced by CN be (98:2, v/v) solutions ([RU] = 30 µM), evident changes of the absorption spectra induced by CN could − − observed (Figure 6). As in Figure 6a, in6a,the of P3,ofupon the addition of CNof, the be observed (Figure 6). shown As shown in Figure incase the case P3, upon the addition CN initial , the absorption bands at 569 nm were blue-shifted to 539 nm along with the obvious decrease of initial absorption bands at 569 nm were blue-shifted to 539 nm along with the obvious decrease of the the absorbance. However,any anychanges changescould couldhardly hardlybebefound found presence other anions. From Figure absorbance. However, inin presence of of other anions. From Figure 6b, −, gradual reduction of the absorbance and 6b, with the addition an increasing concentration of−CN with the addition of anofincreasing concentration of CN , gradual reduction of the absorbance and blue blue shift the absorption 569 nm observed, were observed, andisosbestic clear isosbestic at 492 was shift of theofabsorption band band at 569atnm were and clear points points at 492 nm wasnm found, found, indicative of the formation of new [6,32,33]. species [6,32,33]. More importantly, the changes of the indicative of the formation of new species More importantly, the changes of the solution solution color from purple to faint yellow can be clearly observed by the naked eyes upon addition color from purple to faint yellow can be clearly observed by the naked eyes upon addition of 20 equiv. − ionsoftoCN of ions to P3 (Figure other anions hardly induced any significant color of 20 CNequiv. P3− (Figure 6c), while 6c), the while other the anions hardly induced any significant color change, − − change,indicated which indicated that naked-eye of CN became which that naked-eye selectiveselective detectiondetection of CN became possible.possible. The sensing behavior was further studied by fluorescence spectra. In the case of P3, as shown in Figure 7a, the fluorescence intensity of P3 at 633 nm was significantly quenched in the presence of cyanide anions, while it gave no distinct response to other anions. Titration of CN− to the solution of P3 (Figure 7b), gradual decrease of fluorescence intensity at 633 nm was observed with the molar ratio increase of CN− from 1:0 to 1:50 equiv. Indeed, besides the visible color change discussed above, the addition of CN− also led to a significant quenching of the strong pink fluorescence as shown in Figure 7c. Other polymers showed similar obvious changes in the UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra upon addition of CN− ions, which were shown in Figures S20–S28. Based on the fluorescent titration data, the detection limit of P3 was estimated to be 33.2 µM according to the definition of IUPAC (3s/k, three times blank standard deviation/slope of analytical curve, Figure S29). Similarly, the detection limit of P1, P2 and P4 were 165.7, 89.4 and 22.4 µM, respectively. These results demonstrated these polymers could be used as selective and sensitive colorimetric probe for cyanide anions.

A 0.1

0.1

0.0 300

400

500

600

0.0 300

700

Wavelength / nm

400

500

600

700

Wavelength / nm

Polymers 2017, 512 (c)9, 9, Polymers 2017, 512 P3

(a)

HSO4-

Cl-

F-

Br-

0.6 0.5

Absorbance

1111 ofof 1414 H2PO4-

(b)

I-

NO3-

AcO-

CN-

0.6

P3 + other anions 0.5

0.4

0

0.4

Absorbance

Figure 6. (a) UV-Vis spectra of P3 ([RU] = 30 μM) in THF/H2O (98:2, v/v) in the presence of 20 equiv. 0.3 of different anions; (b) UV-Vis spectral changes of P3 0.3([RU] = 30 µ M) in THF/H2O (98:2, v/v) upon - of CN− (0, 120, 240, 270, 300, 330, addition of an increasing concentration 480, 510, 492 360, nm 390, 420, 450, P3 + CN 0.2 50 equiv. 0.2 540, 570, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1200 and 1500 µ M); and (c) visual images observed for P3 solutions 0.1 0.1 upon addition of 50 equiv. each anion. 0.0

0.0

300 400 500 700 300 400 500the case 600 The sensing behavior was further600 studied by fluorescence spectra. In of P3, as700shown in Wavelength / nm Wavelength / nm Figure 7a,(c) the fluorescence intensity of P3 at 633 nm was significantly quenched in the presence of cyanide anions, while it gave no distinct response to other anions. Titration of CN− to the solution of HSO Cl- of fluorescence BrH I- at 633NO AcOobserved CN- with the molar F4 2PO4 3 P3 (Figure 7b), P3 gradual decrease intensity nm was ratio increase of CN− from 1:0 to 1:50 equiv. Indeed, besides the visible color change discussed above, the addition of CN− also led to a significant quenching of the strong pink fluorescence as shown in Figure 7c. Other polymers showed similar obvious changes in the UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence upon addition CN−= ions, which were2Oshown in Figure S20–S28. on the Figure 6.spectra (a) UV-Vis spectra of P3of ([RU] 30 μM) in THF/H (98:2, v/v) in the presence ofBased 20 equiv. Figure 6. (a) UV-Vis spectra of P3 ([RU] = 30 µM) in THF/H O (98:2, v/v) in the presence of 20 equiv. 2 fluorescent titration data, detection of P3 was estimated toinbeTHF/H 33.2 µ M according to the of different anions; (b) the UV-Vis spectrallimit changes of P3 ([RU] = 30 µ M) 2O (98:2, v/v) upon of different anions;(3s/k, (b) UV-Vis spectral changes of P3 ([RU] = 30 µM) inof THF/H v/v)Figure upon S29). 2 O (98:2, definition of IUPAC three times blank standard deviation/slope analytical curve, − addition of an increasing concentration of CN (0, 120, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360, 390, 420, 450, 480, 510, addition of an increasing concentration of CN− (0, 120, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360, 390, 420, 450, 480, 510, Similarly, the detection limit of1000, P1, P2 and P41500 were 165.7, 89.4 and 22.4 µ M,observed respectively. These results 540, 570, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1200 and µ M); and (c) visual images for P3 solutions 540, 570, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1200 and 1500 µM); and (c) visual images observed for P3 solutions demonstrated theseofpolymers could be used as selective and sensitive colorimetric probe for cyanide upon addition equiv. each anion. upon addition of 5050 equiv. each anion. anions. The sensing behavior was further studied by fluorescence spectra. In the case of P3, as shown in Figure 7a, the fluorescence intensity of P3 at 633 nm was significantly quenched in the presence of cyanide anions, while it gave no distinct response to other anions. Titration of CN− to the solution of P3 (Figure 7b), gradual decrease of fluorescence intensity at 633 nm was observed with the molar ratio increase of CN− from 1:0 to 1:50 equiv. Indeed, besides the visible color change discussed above, the addition of CN− also led to a significant quenching of the strong pink fluorescence as shown in Figure 7c. Other polymers showed similar obvious changes in the UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra upon addition of CN− ions, which were shown in Figure S20–S28. Based on the fluorescent titration data, the detection limit of P3 was estimated to be 33.2 µ M according to the definition of IUPAC (3s/k, three times blank standard deviation/slope of analytical curve, Figure S29). Similarly, the detection limit of P1, P2 and P4 were 165.7, 89.4 and 22.4 µ M, respectively. These results demonstrated these polymers could be used as selective and sensitive colorimetric probe for cyanide anions.

Figure 7. (a) Fluorescence spectra of P3 ([RU] = 30 µM) in THF/H2 O (98:2, v/v) in the presence of 20 equiv. of different anions, λex = 365 nm; (b) fluorescence spectral changes of P3 ([RU] = 30 µM) in THF/H2 O (98:2, v/v) upon addition of an increasing concentration of CN− (0, 120, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360, 390, 420, 450, 480, 510, 540, 570, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1200 and 1500 µM), λex = 365 nm; and (c) fluorescence observed for P3 solutions upon addition of 50 equiv. each anion under the excitation of 365 nm.

To further demonstrate the preferential selective detection of CN− , competition experiments were further carried out by addition of 20 equiv. of other tested anions to P3 solution in the presence of 20 equiv. of CN− anion and the results are shown in Figure 8. From Figure 8, the absorbance of P3 at 569 nm was hardly interfered by HSO4 − , H2 PO4 − and AcO4 − , and was changed by 20%–35% by Cl− , F− ,

fluorescence observed for P3 solutions upon addition of 50 equiv. each anion under the excitation of 365 nm.

AbsCN-+M/AbsCN- ( 569 nm )

To further demonstrate the preferential selective detection of CN−, competition experiments were further carried out by addition of 20 equiv. of other tested anions to P3 solution in the presence Polymers 2017, 9, 512 − 14 of 20 equiv. of CN anion and the results are shown in Figure 8. From Figure 8, the absorbance12ofofP3 at 569 nm was hardly interfered by HSO4−, H2PO4− and AcO4−, and was changed by 20%–35% by Cl−, −,−Br−− − and NO −. The results suggest that the−CN− induced UV-Vis absorption response of P3 FBr , I , Iand NO3 − .3 The results suggest that the CN induced UV-Vis absorption response of P3 solution solution canincoexist in otheranions. common anions. Other(P1, polymers P2 and P4) the similar can coexist other common Other polymers P2 and (P1, P4) exhibited theexhibited similar phenomenon, − phenomenon, indicative the exclusive sensitivity of polymers towards S22, S25 and indicative of the exclusiveofsensitivity of polymers towards CN− (Figures S22,CN S25(Figure and S28). S28). 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

Figure 8. Changes in the UV-Vis absorbance at 569 nm of P3 ([RU] = 30 µM) containing 20 equiv. of Figure 8. Changes in the UV-Vis absorbance at 569 nm of P3 ([RU] = 30 µ M) containing 20 equiv. of CN- anions upon the addition of 20 equiv. of other competing anions in THF/H2 O (98:2, v/v). CN- anions upon the addition of 20 equiv. of other competing anions in THF/H2O (98:2, v/v). 1 H NMR To gain gain further further insight insight into into the the nature nature of of polymers-cyanide polymers-cyanide interactions, To interactions, the the changes changes of of 1H NMR spectra produced via the addition of cyanide anion to the M-BODIPY and P3 solutions were monitored. spectra produced via the addition of cyanide anion to the M-BODIPY and P3 solutions were As depictedAs in Figure S30, two doublet at 7.24 and 7.11 theassigned phenyl protons monitored. depicted inthe Figure S30, the peaks two doublet peaks atppm 7.24 assigned and 7.11 to ppm to the − to at the 8 position of BODIPY unit were shifted to 7.12 and 6.82 ppm upon the addition of CN phenyl protons at the 8 position of BODIPY unit were shifted to 7.12 and 6.82 ppm upon the addition a THF-d M-BODIPY, respectively. These observations are consistent with the previous of CN− to8 solution a THF-d8of solution of M-BODIPY, respectively. These observations are consistent with the reported reported results [6], indicating that the BODIPY may core be broken after the addition CN− and previous results [6], indicating that the core BODIPY may be broken after theof addition of 1 H NMR spectra of P3 before and after the addition of CN− showed new species were formed. The − 1 CN and new species were formed. The H NMR spectra of P3 before and after the addition of CN− the similar TheS30). twoThe peaks 7.71 and 7.54and ppm assigned to the phenyl showed theresults similar(Figure results S30). (Figure twoatpeaks at 7.71 7.54 ppm assigned to theprotons phenyl at the 8 position of BODIPY unit were similarly shifted to 7.55 and 7.47and ppm, respectively. Besides, protons at the 8 position of BODIPY unit were similarly shifted to 7.55 7.47 ppm, respectively. − the M-BODIPY exhibited similar UV-Vis and fluorescence changes upon the addition of CN Besides, the M-BODIPY exhibited similar UV-Vis and spectral fluorescence spectral changes upon the − is by the decomposition of the (as shownofinCN Figure Thus, the selective response P3 to CN − (as S31). addition shown in Figure S31). Thus, theofselective response of P3 to CN− is by the BODIPY core. decomposition of the BODIPY core.

4. Conclusions 4. Conclusions In this work, four novel BODIPY-containing conjugated polymers with different connectivity on In this work, four novel BODIPY-containing conjugated polymers with different connectivity on BODIPY and conjugation length were successfully synthesized. All copolymers show broad absorption BODIPY and conjugation length were successfully synthesized. All copolymers show broad in the wavelength region from 300 to 750 nm and display significant red shifts of both their absorption absorption in the wavelength region from 300 to 750 nm and display significant red shifts of both and fluorescence spectra maxima compared with their initial BODIPY monomers due to the significant their absorption and fluorescence spectra maxima compared with their initial BODIPY monomers extension of π-conjugation. The absorption and fluorescence spectra peaks of P2 and P4 with fluorene and BODIPY connected by p-diacetylenebenzene exhibited obvious red shifts compared with those of P1 and P3, respectively, because of their longer conjugation length. Besides, the red-shifted absorption and fluorescence peaks and longer LUMO delocalization length for P1 and P2 relative to those for P3 and P4, respectively, demonstrate that polymers with connectivity at 3,5-positions of BODIPY possess more effective conjugation than those at 2,6-positions. Moreover, the BODIPY-based copolymers exhibited selectively sensitive responses to cyanide anions, resulting in great blue-shift and decreased absorbance of UV-Vis absorption spectra, and significant quenching of the fluorescence intensity while they hardly displayed any responses to other ions, such as F− , Cl− , Br− , I− , AcO− , HSO4 − , H2 PO4 − ,

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

13 of 14

and NO3 − . The results demonstrated that BODIPY-based conjugated copolymers are highly promising for chemical and biological sensing applications. Supplementary Materials: The supplementary materials are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/9/ 10/521/s1. Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 51703046, 21574034 and 21274034), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (ZJNSF) (No. LY16B040006 and LQ18B040001) and the Startup Research Fund of Hangzhou Normal University (No. PD02003003002003). Author Contributions: Qian Zhang and Shouchun Yin designed the experiments; Tian He, Danting Tang, Cuiling Lin, Xi Shen, Chenjie Lu, Luonan Xu and Zhengye Gu performed the research; Zheng Xu did the calculation work; Tian He, Danting Tang, Cuiling Lin, Qian Zhang and Shouchun Yin analyzed the data; and Tian He, Danting Tang, Huayu Qiu, Qian Zhang and Shouchun Yin wrote the paper. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References 1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6. 7.

8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

15.

16.

Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. BODIPY Dyes and Their Derivatives: Syntheses and Spectroscopic Properties. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4891–4932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. The Chemistry of Fluorescent Bodipy Dyes: Versatility Unsurpassed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1184–1201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Liu, B.; Li, L.; Lin, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, H.; Qiu, H.; Yin, S. Polyacetylenes containing BODIPY pendants with different connectivities: synthesis, characterization and opto-electronic properties. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 372–381. [CrossRef] Liu, B.; Huang, F.; Shi, Y.; Ni, Z.; Lin, Y.; Yin, S. Synthesis, characterization and optical properties of a new poly(aryleneethynylene)a co-cotaining BODIPY. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 33, 1133–1139. Nepomnyashchii, A.B.; Bard, A.J. Electrochemistry and Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence of BODIPY Dyes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1844–1853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Wang, L.; Fang, G.; Cao, D. Highly selective and sensitive detection of F– and CN– ions simultaneously by a reaction-based BODIPY-containing conjugated polymer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 63–74. [CrossRef] Bessette, A.; Hanan, G.S. Design, synthesis and photophysical studies of dipyrromethene-based materials: Insights into their applications in organic photovoltaic devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3342–3405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Kowada, T.; Maeda, H.; Kikuchi, K. BODIPY-based probes for the fluorescence imaging of biomolecules in living cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4953–4972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ekmekci, Z.; Yilmaz, M.D.; Akkaya, E.U. A Monostyryl-boradiazaindacene BODIPY. Derivative as Colorimetric and Fluorescent Probe for Cyanide Ions. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 461–464. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Lee, C.-H.; Yoon, H.-J.; Shim, J.-S.; Jang, W.-D. A Boradiazaindacene-Based Turn-On Fluorescent Probe for Cyanide Detection in Aqueous Media. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 4513–4516. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Madhu, S.; Basu, S.K.; Jadhav, S.; Ravikanth, M. 3,5-Diformyl-borondipyrromethene for selective detection of cyanide anion. Analyst 2013, 138, 299–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Bredas, J.L.; Norton, J.E.; Cornil, J.; Coropceanu, V. Molecular Understanding of Organic Solar Cells: The Challenges. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1691–1699. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Venkat, R.; Donuru, G.K.V.; Velayudham, S.; Green, S.; Liu, H. Synthesis and Optical Properties of Red and Deep-Red Emissive Polymeric and Copolymeric BODIPY Dyes. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2130–2138. Nagai, A.; Miyake, J.; Kokado, K.; Nagata, Y.; Chujo, Y. Highly Luminescent BODIPY-Based Organoboron Polymer Exhibiting Supramolecular Self-Assemble Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15276–15278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Zhu, Y.L.; Ji, Y.J.; Wang, D.G.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, H.; Jia, X.R.; Song, M.; Yu, G.P.; Kuang, G.C. BODIPY-based conjugated porous polymers for highly efficient volatile iodine capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 6622–6629. [CrossRef] Sen, C.P.; Shrestha, R.G.; Shrestha, L.K.; Ariga, K.; Valiyaveettil, S. Low-Band-Gap BODIPY Conjugated Copolymers for Sensing Volatile Organic Compounds. Chemistry 2015, 21, 17344–17354. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Polymers 2017, 9, 512

17. 18.

19.

20. 21. 22. 23.

24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.

30.

31. 32.

33.

14 of 14

Ma, X.; Mao, X.; Zhang, S.; Huang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, C. Aza-BODIPY-based D-π-A conjugated polymers with tunable band gap: Synthesis and near-infrared emission. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 520–527. [CrossRef] Economopoulos, S.P.; Chochos, C.L.; Ioannidou, H.A.; Neophytou, M.; Charilaou, C.; Zissimou, G.A.; Frost, J.M.; Sachetan, T.; Shahid, M.; Nelson, J.; et al. Novel BODIPY-based conjugated polymers donors for organic photovoltaic applications. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 10221. [CrossRef] Debnath, S.; Singh, S.; Bedi, A.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Zade, S.S. Site-Selective Synthesis and Characterization of BODIPY-Acetylene Copolymers and Their Transistor Properties. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 1978–1986. [CrossRef] Meng, G.; Velayudham, S.; Smith, A.; Luck, R.; Liu, H. Color Tuning of Polyfluorene Emission with BODIPY Monomers. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1995–2001. [CrossRef] Akcelrud, L. Electroluminescent polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 875–962. [CrossRef] Grell, M.; Bradley, D.D.C.; Inbasekaran, M.; Woo, E.P. A glass-forming conjugated main-chain liquid crystal polymer for polarized electroluminescence applications. Adv. Mater. 1997, 9, 798–802. [CrossRef] Grell, M.; Knoll, W.; Lupo, D.; Meisel, A.; Miteva, T.; Neher, D.; Nothofer, H.-G.; Scherf, U.; Yasuda, A. Blue Polarized Electroluminescence from a Liquid Crystalline Polyfluorene. Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 671–675. [CrossRef] Kim, D.Y.; Cho, H.N.; Kim, C.Y. Blue light emitting polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 1089–1139. [CrossRef] Leclerc, M. Polyfluorenes: Twenty years of progress. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 2867–2873. [CrossRef] Neher, D. Polyfluorene Homopolymers: Conjugated Liquid-Crystalline Polymers for Bright Blue Emission and Polarized Electroluminescence. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 1365–1385. [CrossRef] Pei, Q.; Yang. Efficient Photoluminescence and Electroluminescence from a Soluble Polyfluorene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7416–7417. [CrossRef] Scherf, U.; List, E.J.W. Semiconducting Polyfluorenes-Towards Reliable Structure–Property Relationships. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 477–487. [CrossRef] Svensson, M.; Zhang, F.; Veenstra, S.C.; Verhees, W.J.H.; Hummelen, J.C.; Kroon, J.M.; Inganäs, O.; Andersson, M.R. High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells of an Alternating Polyfluorene Copolymer and a Fullerene Derivative. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 988–991. [CrossRef] Yin, S.; Leen, V.; Snick, S.V.; Boens, N.; Dehaen, W. A highly sensitive, selective, colorimetric and near-infrared fluorescent turn-on chemosensor for Cu2+ based on BODIPY. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6329–6331. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Cui, C.; Wong, W.-Y.; Li, Y. Improvement of open-circuit voltage and photovoltaic properties of 2D-conjugated polymers by alkylthio substitution. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2276–2284. [CrossRef] Liu, J.; He, X.; Zhang, J.; He, T.; Huang, L.; Shen, J.; Li, D.; Qiu, H.; Yin, S. A BODIPY derivative for colorimetric and fluorometric sensing of fluoride ion and its logic gates behavior. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 538–545. [CrossRef] He, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Dong, L.; Li, D.; Qiu, H.; Yin, S. A novel BODIPY-based colorimetric and fluorometric dual-mode chemosensor for Hg2+ and Cu2+ . Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 192, 29–35. [CrossRef] © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).