Contrived Confusions | Economic and Political Weekly
Home
Archives
Subscription
RSS
08/03/15 12:06 PM
About Us
Contact Us
For Contributors
Search
Search ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Editorial
Home
Commentary
Book Reviews
Perspectives
Special Articles
Specials
Web Exclusives
Postscript
More
Web Exclusives Change Text Size
A A
A
Free Issues
Contrived Confusions
March 7, 2015 February 28, 2015 February 21, 2015 February 14, 2015
No Contradictions Between PCPNDT and MTP Acts Vol - L No. 10, March 07, 2015 | Vandana Prasad Bibtex
Web Exclusives Endnote
RIS
Google Scholar
Print
Email
Ethical dilemmas surrounding abortion, particularly the conflict between human and legal rights of a childbearing woman
Vol - L No. 10
and the so-called rights of an unborn child, are quite legitimate. However, the pro-life activists should desist from treating
March 7, 2015
a woman as mere receptacle for the unborn child, taking away her inalienable right to control her own body. Vandana Prasad is with the Public Health Resource Network.
SUBSCRIBE
Table of Contents Zoom Cover
In the first week of December 2014, participants of a large rally at Jantar Mantar against cuts in social sector spending were shocked to see an anti-abortion stall with a banner titled “Delhi Commission for Women, Archdiocese of Delhi”, suggesting a partnership between the orthodox religious organisation and the Delhi Commission for Women. The stall housed posters that seamlessly mixed up issues of sex-selective abortion with pro-life stands against abortion per se. As it transpired, the religious organisation itself claimed a commission for women that was leading an exercise many would find anti-women’s rights, and which caused such public confusion. Notwithstanding, the more important unresolved issue is the confusion that seems to prevail in government and civil society both between the intention of the Pre-Conception
Religion and Citizenship How does religious identity constitute the idea of development and well-being in South Asia? This Special Issue reflects on this topic.
and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, and the Medical Termination Of Pregnancy MTP Act, 1971, and which is being exploited by many “pro-life” organisations of all religious hues to rouse public support against the legal entitlement of abortion. While no one might argue in favour of abortion as a desirable method of family planning or contraception from the public health perspective, safe abortion is considered a significant reproductive right of women and is upheld as a pillar of
From the Next Issue Click here...
reproductive health services by the progressive countries of the world. This is specially the case in countries like India, where women often do not have the power within the family to determine when and how they might be pregnant. Further, as the recent tragedy in the Chhattisgarh sterilisation camps also demonstrates, there is a high unmet need for decent contraceptive services on the supply side that prevent women from accessing their choice of contraception. Unsafe abortions contribute significantly to maternal mortality, and it has been proved that having legislations permitting abortion prevents unsafe abortions and brings down maternal mortality.
Digital Editions of EPW Books A number of titles of EPW/Sameeksha Trust Books are now available in digital version.
Basic Right of a Woman vs Rights of a Unborn Child Please explore for details. Certainly, from the point of view of human rights, at first sight, there does appear to be some conflict between the rights of women to be allowed to determine whether to house a pregnancy in their bodies and the so-called rights of the “unborn child”. However, as correctly argued by feminists, the rights of the woman are to be given precedence as an “existing” human being as against the rights of a child that does not yet exist as an independent fully functional being. In other words, the foetus does not have rights. Taking all these factors into account the right to safe abortion has been accorded to women after much struggle by women’s rights groups, by the law of the land as per the MTP ACT, which now stands to be amended with the intention to allow greater access to the highly neglected services for safe abortion. The MTP Act permits abortions in certain conditions up to the 20th week of gestation, while fetuses beyond 37 weeks are considered “mature” for independent existence. This leaves a fair amount of time between the permission for abortion and the consideration of the foetus as having the potential to live. However, this is somewhat confounded by the fact that modern science is able to save neonates born at gestations much preceding 37 weeks; as young as 28 week-old fetuses (7th month of pregnancy) may be kept alive with modern technology using ventilators, parenteral feeding etc. This
Current Statistics
narrows and blurs this boundary area somewhat in the minds of people applying a humanitarian rather than a legal
file:///Users/vandana/Desktop/Contrived%20Confusions%20%7C%20Economic%20and%20Political%20Weekly.webarchive
Page 1 of 4
Contrived Confusions | Economic and Political Weekly
08/03/15 12:06 PM
Time Series Data in Excel Files
perspective to the issue.
available at Nonetheless, the right to abortion must be differentiated from the laws against sex discrimination that are in no way in
India Time Series Lite pages.
contradiction to each other. There is no conflict between the PCPNDT Act and the MTP Act. The MTP Act allows abortion, while the PCPNDT forbids pre-natal sex determination to stop female foeticide. By conflating the two, confusion Review Issues
is being created in the minds of the public against a basic right of women. Even government posters for “awareness generation” of the public with respect to sex determination have been found to
Special Issues
Review of Rural Affairs: June 29, 2013
use the terminology of “bhroon hatya” or “foeticide” rather than “abortion” – a term that indicates a homicidal criminal
With Indian agriculture growing slowly,
activity of taking “a life”. Our engagements with the general public as well as public health activists as “trainers” reveals
employment in agriculture too has been increasing
the depth of confusion caused when people are questioned on why the foeticide of a male foetus is acceptable but not a
at a low rate. Urban employment has not
female one and whether there is some discrimination at play here with respect to the rights of the child.
expanded rapidly enough to provide work for the growing rural population. So, is the rise in non-
Act of Abortion
agricultural employment in recent years driven
Of course, the question itself is incorrectly premised; the only thing that is illegal, within the prescriptions of the MTP Act
more by distress than demand? Three articles in
and the PCPNDT Act, is determining the sex of the foetus (in this context, prior to abortion). It is entirely a social construct
this edition of the Review of Rural Affairs look at
that causes female fetuses to be selectively aborted, therefore creating a link with the falling sex ratios in our country. The aborted fetus may be male or female—as long as it is not known prior to the act of abortion and as long as the sex of the fetus is not permitted to influence the decision of abortion. A pregnancy may be continued or aborted as per the provisions of the MTP Act, and this must happen irrespective of sex determination, as pronounced by the PCPNDT Act.
aspects of this issue. A couple of related issues that are examined are the growth of “non-cultivating households” and the movement of wages of agricultural labour. Read Review of Rural Affairs
While the government may be working from ignorance or carelessness, the pro-life groups have used this confusion to
For All Review Issues
attack the act of abortion per se, raising slogans such as “one life is taken and another harmed”. While these groups have the freedom to take an anti-abortion stance, the government must be more careful to stand by the current laws of the land and eschew the term “female foeticide” entirely in its documents and public media. It is hoped that people grappling with the legitimate ethical paradox between the rights (legal and human) of the childbearing woman and the humanitarian concerns for unborn children will take into consideration the background arguments and factual legal elements, and arrive at a balanced view that safeguards against women being treated as passive hosts of unborn children. At the very least, such an exercise must not be carried out under the pretext of “saving the girl child”, who is neither to be selectively saved nor destroyed.
Tweet
Tweet
0
0
0
0
Comments
EPW - iOS and Android apps
EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy.
The EPW iOS app for iPad and iPhone is now
They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in
live in the App Store. An updated version of the
the Letters pages of EPW.
Android app (Version 2.0) is also available on the Google Play store.
0 Comments Recommend
Economic and Political Weekly
⤤ Share
Login
Sort by Best
Start the discussion… Recent Comments
Most read
Be the first to comment. epw_webeditor
✉
Please write to
[email protected] with your subscription number. Thanks. Subscribe
d
Add Disqus to your site
Privacy The Ethanol Blending Policy in India · 4 days ago
epw_webeditor Please write to
[email protected] with your
file:///Users/vandana/Desktop/Contrived%20Confusions%20%7C%20Economic%20and%20Political%20Weekly.webarchive
Page 2 of 4
