Cytologic Diagnosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage ...

0 downloads 0 Views 228KB Size Report
maintain a high index of suspicion in order to properly diagnose and treat this complication of lung cancer. Joseph. C. Koval, M.D., F.C.C.P,. Robert M. Curley,.
revealed almost

extensive totally

respiratory

failure

endobronchial tilation.

the

mens revealed well to 2,800 stmccessftmlly

lower

left

immediately

the carina brolnchi.

following

prolmpting

carcinoma. over

and

was instittmted.

delivered

fotmr

mechanical

yen-

biopsy

The

tumor

day’s;

the

pneumonia

therapy.

which

She

was

responded

again

qimickly

lower

lung

field.

Chest

x-ray

lower

lobe

the

that

climiiciamis

treating

these

especially’ in patients rhmring chemotherapy: Pii’ter

Brann

E. Postmus, L,unburg,

Hennie

M.D.;

MI).

and

,

C;, Russchen,

It!. 1).,

Univer.sity Groningen,

of a

hospital

Hospital

The

Netherlands

REFERENCES

in

Russchen Gil, Limburg AJ, Postmus PE. A pyrrhic victors’ in small cell lung cancer. Chest 1989; 95: 1331-32 2 AbeloffMD, Klastersky’J, Drings PD, Eagan lIT, Holsti L, Grecu FA, Mattson K, Postmus PE. Complications oftreatrnent of small cell carcinoma ofthe limng. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67:21-26 3 Sridhar KS, Barreras I, Saldana MJ, Manten II. Respiratory tract fisttmlae in recurrent aerodigestive cancers after chemotherapy Cancer 1988; 61:247-51 1

heard

showed

the

Cimrley

extimbated.

for ronchi

between

Esophagoscopy

and

was

cough.

examination

a fistula

bronchus.

Koval

responded

in the

prominent

lung markings in the right lower lobe. A barium contrast x-ray film of the esophagus (Fig 1)-shown in the right anterior oblique projection-demonstrated

with

Patients must be ass’are of this complication, (level(Iping infectiolns in the llasal lmmng parts

to intravenoims

to

1989 because of dysphagia and Her physical examination was remarkable

ttml)e indicated.’

agree

sped-

patient

and

admitted

celestin

ofa

\Ve

and

mechanical

The

ventilation

September,

right

and Acute

bronchoscopy

intubation

cCy

from

involving mainstem

was then begun using cisplatin and etop()side. 1989 the patient developed symptoms and signs lobe

antibiotic

and

radiotherapy small cell lung

weaned

Chemotherapy In August,

tumor

right

ensued

biolpsies, Emergent

right

endobronchial

occluding

esophagus

revealed

and

no

right

intraluminal

and the fistula could not be identified. The patient was with a percutaneotms gastrostomy tube for feeding and cytotox,ic therapy has been continued. Our patient differs from previously reported patients’2 in that she developed a bronchoesophageal fistimla while responding to) a tumor,

treated

combination

ofradiotherapy

and

chemotherapy’

that direct

extension

of SCLC

we postulate esophagus tumor

occurred

and

in response

to visualize

caused

a fistula

to combined

any

tumor

by a bulky

esophagus

that

modality

have

pressing

also

with

intol

shrinkage

therapy, stretching

and

with

necrosis

displacing

factor

A Diagnostic

the

imnable

wall

a contributing

Since

these

fistulae

are

are

almost

always

impossible

to prevent,

associated

and

with

fistula

morbidity’

pulmonary

C. Koval,

and

Mercy

and

Hospital

Taylor

Scranton,

Reprint

requests:

Dr

Kayo!,

S02jefferson

Ace,

Barreras

tract fistulae apy. Cancer

L,

in recurrent 1988;

aerodigestive

Manten

H.

cancers

after

in peripheral

bronchoscope

washing

addition

(,-()imld not patients

be

in

Respiratory

chemother-

61:247-51

cell

t(I

The are

patients

examples

without During this

described of a very

first

This metastases.

of chemotherapy;

a common

not

et al is the

in one

complication

workshop

was

by Russchen

majority’

in

IASLC

complication

induction

rare

radiotherapy, the

treated

by Koval and Cimrley- and Rtmsschen and

on small

reported. first

institution

the this

or

tumor.

ltmng cancer

in a series

developed

with

chemosensitive cell

Actually,

patient

who

et al

imu 1981,2

patient

of over

described 500

and

and

two

because

of patients,

centrally

Regarding

believe

it is not

patients

with small

the

justified cell

small located

low

cell with

incidence

to routinely lung

cancer.

lung

of fistula perform

Neither

cancer

mediastinal

is, lymph

in

revealed

malignant washing

remaining

14 patients, or

the

esophagosco)y’

is preventive

placement

40 percent.

was

reached

cells was

imu

eight in

in four

obtained

with

of

the

small

contrast,

it is interesting

patterns

were

positive

iy- this

and

coworkersM

while In the

reached

by complementary sensitivity,

with

post-bromichoscopy the

diagnosis

of malignancy analysis

sensitivity

significantly’

the

sputum,

specimens,

BAL

of 53

with

percent.

increases

diagnostic

imse of bronchial

washing

(p>O.05). of

three

patients,

methld.

patients

neoplastic

and two)

CHEST

Downloaded From: http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/chest/21616/ on 05/30/2017

cell

not

find

diagnosis.

In

did with

By’ contrast,

radiologic lesions had similar to those reported found

we

to histologic

of four

BAL analysis,

diagnostic

LIatients with nodular test. Our results are Baglimi

on

percent),

in relation

that

specimens

percent).

overall

number

positivities

six small

of BAL (40

combined

sputum

of involvement.

adenocarcinomas, (26

of

not

the

a 80

patients

patients an

with

exceeding

12 patients

and

by- analysis

45 years

a peripherically-located

diagnostic

washings

was

analysis

was

The

all three procedtmres (Ibtains The addition of BAL does

exclusively

we

in

lesion Twenty-six

pattern

The

positive

surgery:

Since

in BAL

1 1

the diagnosis

by

exclusively

sensitivity’

showed

of

increased

of 30 patients

index

infiltrative

histology.

use ofhronchial

was

an

was

endobronchial

age

in

yield

bronchoscope.

mean

carcinomas,

mixed

l)ronchial

differences

node

formatiomi,

had

diagnostic

in a group

a Karnofsky’s

26 patients

four

with

women,

the

35 percent

sputtmm the

the

sensitivity through

and

ifthe

the

All had

The

report’

to determine

four

had epidermoid

Because

dimring

chemotherapy. is remarkable

and

analysed

be visualized

in one

post-bronchoscopy

75 years.

in Hodgkin’s

have

carcinoma.

cannot

through

lymphomam2

involvement

BAL cytologic analysis carcinoma in whom

plims post-bronchoscopy’

patients

complicati(In

and

Radiologically, or mass

combined

Editor:

tried

visimalized men

of 36

percent.

victory’

lung

were

range

PA 18510

(If

primary

that

specimens

lung

workers

lung

60 percent

study#{176}We have

llrOnchiaj

Few

lesions been

cytologic

in primary’ lung

fungoides. in peripheral

has

techniques To the

Neoplasmas

lavage)

imseful

of parenchymal

mycosis

achieved

Eleven

MJ,

diagnosis and

(bronchoalveolar

diagnostically

sensitivity

node

Saldana

for Lung

Location

of BAL

found

diagnostic

with

Pennsylvania

1 Russchen GH, Limburg AJ, Postmtms, PE. A pyrrhic small cell lung cancer. Chest 1989; 95: 1331-32 KS,

in the

by- the

REFERENCES

2 Sridhar

and

the

Hospital,

Scranton,

been

another

of Medicine,

Moses

has

disease’

M.D., F.C.C.P, M. Curley, DO,

Robert

a Peripheral

The analysis

infections

Department

Technique

the

for

resulting from aspiration of esophageal contents, the clinician mimst maintain a high index of suspicion in order to properly diagnose and treat this complication of lung cancer. Joseph

in Bronchoalveolar

To the Editor:

formation.

mortality

Cytologic Diagnosis Lavage Specimens

of the

we were

Esophageal

on,

been

Althoimgh

the lung

from

formed

by esophagoscopy.

timmor

may

for SCLC.

infiltrative

them

of

only

positive

five

of 26

a positive by

diagnostic Sineway et al.#{176}

imi nine

I 98 I 2 I AUGUST,

of

1990

1 1

BAL

513