danger to the popliteal artery in - CiteSeerX

1 downloads 0 Views 407KB Size Report
Oct 20, 1994 - DANGER. TO THE POPLITEAL. ARTERY. IN. HIGH. TIBIAL. OSTEOTOMY. S. H. A. ZAIDI,. A. G. COBB. G. BENTLEY. From the Royal. National.
DANGER HIGH

TO THE TIBIAL

S. H. A. ZAIDI,

From

We

report

case

Orthopaedic

in

which

upper tibial of fiexion.

9O

We

used

duplex

the

the

to the posterior surface degrees of fiexion of the knee. in 12 of 20 knees the popliteal

popliteal

artery Joint

Received

artery

was

performed

tibia,

Surg

from (Br!

21 October

ten the

healthy popliteal

of the tibia at various Our results showed that artery was closer to the

after

revision

of the

tibial

plateau.

likely to be injured when the knee allows the artery to fall back from Crenshaw 1987; Adams 1992),

we could

injury. Accepted

level

but

20 October

supported

by

any

published

studied the movement plane during flexion embalmed cadavers. artery

kinked

varied

very

applied Our

to the tibia. study used

1994

Repair

recovery. popliteal

by

artery

direct is less

is flexed to 90#{176} since this the tibia (Coventry 1973; but this concept is not

work.

Vernon

et

al

(1987)

of the popliteal artery in the sagittal of the knee using angiography in nonThey noted that the femoral part of the

during little,

flexion,

but

maintaining duplex

that

the

a constant

tibial

section

curve

closely

ultrasonography

relationship of the popliteal and to assess the protection

l995:77-B:384-6. 1 993:

at the

artery

suture resulted in an uncomplicated It is generally believed that the

in from

England

with is believed to

of knee fiexion than in full extension. performing upper tibial osteotomy should that flexing the knee does not protect the

9iO

J Bone

the

distance

artery

Middlesex,

popliteal

ultrasonography

to measure

tibia in Surgeons be aware

Hospital,

osteotomy This position

allow it to fall safely back from find no published confirmation. volunteers

IN

G. BENTLEY

National

a

divided during the knee in

ARTERY

OSTEOTOMY

A. G. COBB.

the Royal

POPLITEAL

to

artery to the back afforded by flexing

define

the

of the tibia the knee.

ANATOMY

Injury to the popliteal artery is rare: only one case was operations reported

of

popliteal ton and

artery after such Bouchard 1990).

during reported

upper tibial osteotomy in a review of 804

in ten series (Insall 1984). Two cases have been the formation of a false aneurysm in the an osteotomy We report

(Rubens, one case

Wellingof severe

Anatomical only to the position in ly down to into

description of the popliteal artery usually refers extended knee. The artery is in a slightly lateral the intercondylar fossa and then passes obliquethe lower border of popliteus where it divides

the anterior

and posterior

occasionally above the anterior artery descends

arteries.

applied

Case report. A 63-year-old woman had osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee and a varus deformity. With the knee flexed to 90#{176}, a laterally-based wedge of tibia was removed using an osteotome. When the tourniquet was

ed from the bone as the soleal line

released exploration

the level of a high tibial osteotomy, below the joint line, and winds round muscles. The medial inferior geniculate

was showed

profuse complete

arterial bleeding. division of

Immediate the popliteal

1990). The

lateral

In most

specimens

by the popliteus (Warwick and

inferior

geniculate

The

popliteus, of this

injury.

there

to the tibia.

tibial

level of in front

division

and muscle,

the artery

muscle Williams artery

is

then the closely is separat-

as far inferiorly 1973; McMinn

takes

origin

at about

between 1 and 2 cm the tibia deep to the artery arises higher.

Soleus and the lateral head of the gastrocnemius are posterior to the artery at this level; they are close to their origins and, free S. H. A. Zaidi, MA, MB, BChir, Senior House Officer A. G. Cobb, BSc, FRCS, Senior Lecturer in Orthopaedic Surgery G. Bentley, ChM, FRCS, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery The Institute of Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Trust, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP, UK. Correspondence Thane Villas,

should Finsbury

©1995 British 030l-620X/95/3994

Editorial

384

be sent to Dr S. H. A. Zaidi Park, London N7 7PE, UK. Society

$2.00

of Bone

and

Joint

at 3 Thane

NHS

being

embedded

to move. The lower

forward vessels,

half

in the deep of the

popliteal

fascia artery

against the popliteus muscle the soleus and the lateral head

of the

leg,

is therefore

are

not held

by the geniculate of gastrocnemius.

Mansions.

METHODS Surgery

We

attempted

to

image THE

the JOURNAL

popliteal OF BONE

artery AND

at JOINT

various SURGERY

DANGER

TO THE

POPLITEAL

ARTERY

IN HIGH

TIBIAL

385

OSTEOTOMY

;j:.: Fig. I Diagram to show artery and the the

the distance tibia.

X measured

degrees of flexion of the knee from the artery to the posterior the joint line We used (Advanced colour-flow image the volunteers were

(Fig. an

I). ATL

uppermost.

on

popliteal

and to determine the distance tibial cortex at 1 .5 cm below

Ultramark

The

their

probe

fossa. The colour-flow popliteal artery and between surface

9

sides, was

with

Duplex

the

placed

imaging the posterior

Fig. 2

machine

In one

against

to be the

popliteal

fully

performed images.

extended

and

on one

knee

at

of any

structures

which

might

affect

its mobility.

RESULTS Duplex teal

ultrasonography. artery

and

the

The posterior

distance tibial

between cortex

the poplivaried

from

VOL.

77-B.

minimally

No. 3, MAY

larger 1995

in the

other

8. The

reduction

popliteal

artery

(P)

and

the

the popliteal artery and angles of knee flexion

the tibial

(degrees)

20

60

90

110

4.2 3.9

4.3 3.2

5.5 4.0

4.7 4.2

6.3 4.7

0.5 0.3

2 L

7.5

5.2

4.9

4.6

5.9

-2.9

R

6.4

5.1

5.7

5.9

6.5

-0.7

3 L R

9.8 10.8

8.0 8.4

8.1 7.6

8.3 7.6

9.2 8.7

-1.5 -3.2

Subject I L R

0

Difference (9OtoO)

L

7.2

5.1

5.2

5.0

6.1

R

6.8

4.8

4.7

5.1

5.9

-2.2 -1.7

5 L R

8.5 8.9

6.3 6.5

6.7 6.2

6.6 7.3

7.2 7.5

-1.9 -1.6

6 L R

5.7 5.4

5.8 5.6

5.5 5.9

6.1 5.7

6.6 6.5

0.4 0.3

7 L R

6.1 6.9

6.4

6.2

6.4

6.7

0.3

7.4

7.4

7.9

8.1

1.0

5.1

4.8

4.6

4.9

5.2

-0.2

R

5.4

5.3

5.1

5.1

6.3

-0.3

L R

7.8 6.9

6.2 5.9

6.4 6.2

5.9 6.1

6.3 6.6

-1.9 -0.8

L R

5.6 5.8

6.2 5.4

6.1 5.7

6.1 6.4

7.2 7.1

0.5 0.6

4

3.9 mm to 10.8 mm in normal knees in full extension (Table I). Change in this distance between full extension and 90#{176} 9 of flexion varied from -3.2 mm to +1.0 mm (mean 10 -0.75 mm). The distance became smaller with flexion in I 2 and

the

flexion

8 L

knees,

showing

(T).

Knee

for

anatomical specimen from a 66-year-old woman 70 kg was dissected to discover the tissues supthe popliteal artery behind the upper tibia, and the

position

tibia

scan

Table 1. Distance in mm between in ten normal subjects at various

tested

the anterior border of the artery and the of the tibia at 1.5 cm distal to the articular

volunteer, MRI was with the ultrasound

comparison

leg

Ultrasound

made it easy to identify the tibial cortex (Fig. 2). The

surface was measured with the knee 20#{176}, 60#{176}, 90#{176} and I 10#{176} of flexion.

One weighing porting

the

Technology Laboratory, Letchworth, UK) with doppler and a 7.5 MHz linear-array probe to popliteal arteries of both knees in ten healthy (six female, age 27 to 69 years). The subjects

examined

distance posterior

between

cortex

S. H. A. ZAIDI.

386

produced

by

(p < 0.01 ; paired The distance increased from at full extension The image

flexion

reached

t-test

for 0#{176} and

statistical

significance

increased in all knees when flexion 90#{176} to 1 10#{176}, but remained smaller than in 9 of the 20 knees (Table I).

minimised

this

resonance

bone

on the ultrasound of points on the

error.

imaging.

was

measured

as 1 1 mm

at 20#{176} flexion. Difficulty from the scan pictures

to only ±1 mm, but those from ultrasound.

Anatomical

dissection.

and

dissection the lateral

as well passing

At the level

confirmed the close head of gastrocnemius

as the origin anteriorly.

of the lateral

at full

in choosing reduced the

measurement sistent with omy

error may direction. however,

In the right knee of subject was possible only in full extension and at 20#{176} of because of the dimensions of the coil. The artery to

space

8 mm points

was that

image representing the bone and the artery was and open to two types of error: interobserver systematic error by one observer. The use of one

Magnetic

the

results

of a high

extension

and

reproducible accuracy were tibial

conosteot-

geniculate

artery

that

popliteal to injury

artery during

away high

flexion

of the knee

does

not move

of the popliteus

minority,

high

muscle,

but

means

that

branching

the anterior tibial artery is closely applied to the tibia deep to this muscle (Warwick and Williams 1973; McMinn 1990). Ultrasonography showed a significant mean decrease in the distance and it may be that the changing bulk of the popliteus muscle accounted for this variation. The artery would probably be at greater risk under the tension of full extension, but the typical patient undergoing tibial osteotomy may not have much arterial elasticity. Although it would seem wise to continue the practice of performing high tibial position of some flexion. fails to confer that the artery No benefits commercial article.

Adams JC. Churchill

osteotomies with the knee in a we have shown that flexion to 90#{176}

any advantage. Surgeons should remains in a vulnerable position.

in any form party related

have been directly

Standard Livingstone,

Ort/iopaedic 1992:398-9.

received or will or indirectly to

be

aware

be received the subject

from a of this

the

from the tibia; it remains vulnerable tibial osteotomy. In most cases the

Operations.

4th

ed.

Edinburgh:

Coventry MB. Osteotomy about the toid arthritis: indications, operative Siity [A,n] 1973:55-A:23-48.

knee for degenerative technique, and results.

and rheumaJ Bone Joint

Crenshaw, AH. Campbell CV Mosby Co. 1987.

orthopaedics.

ed. St Louis:

s operative

Insall J. Osteotomy. Suien Livingstone. 1984:551.

Rubens tibial

shown

by the bulk small

McMinn RMH, ed. Edinburgh: Churchill

DISCUSSION We have

is protected

REFERENCES

of

apposition of the soleus to the popliteal artery. inferior

G. BENTLEY

in an important

operator minimised the former. Any systematic have skewed the results in a positive or negative Recording changes rather than absolute distances,

3, this flexion,

artery

90#{176}).

accuracy of the measuring cursor was ±0.2 mm, but the selection

ultrasound subjective error and

A. G. COBB.

F, Wellington osteotomy:

of the

Last

knee.

I St

Seventh ed.

Regional I 990:173.

c Anato,n

Livingstone,

Edinburgh: and

JL, Bouchard AG. Popliteal report of two cases. Can J Surg

Applied. artery

Williams 1973.

PL,

THE

eds.

Gravc

JOURNAL

Anato,n

OF BONE

8th injury

ed. after

1990:33:294-7.

Vernon P, Delattre JF, Johnson EJ. Palot JP, Clement modifications of the popliteal arterial axis in the sagittal flexion of the knee. Surg Radio/ Anat 1987:9:37-41. Warwick R, Longman,

Churchill

35th

AND

C. Dynamic plane during ed.

JOINT

Edinburgh:

SURGERY