Timely Post-Discharge Care Reduces Readmissions for Rural Veterans with. Congestive ... Kaboli, MD, MS, of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA.
September 2009
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Timely Post-Discharge Care Reduces Readmissions for Rural Veterans with Congestive Heart Failure or Acute Myocardial Infarction Policy Brief | September 2009 Kyle Muus, PhD; Alana Knudson, PhD; and Marilyn G. Klug, PhD, of The University of North Dakota Center for Rural Health, Grand Forks; and Jane Gokun, MS; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin, PhD; and Peter Kaboli, MD, MS, of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA.
Objectives
Background
Derive 30-day readmission prevalence for rural veterans with CHF (N = 11,334) and AMI (N = 4,714), and examine the effect of demographic and health-care factors, including post-discharge VA health service use, on these readmissions.
■
Congestive heart failure (CHF) affects an estimated five million Americans, and about 550,000 are diagnosed with CHF annually. CHF is the principal cause of death for approximately 400,000 persons annually in the United States.1
■
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) also levies a heavy toll on the health of Americans, affecting 7.9 million persons and causing 158,000 deaths in 2004.2
■
Hospital readmissions, costly and often wasteful, may indicate poor in-hospital care; insufficient discharge planning; and uncoordinated transition care or inadequate post-discharge care or both.3, 4, 5, 6
■
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has recommended public reporting of hospital-specific readmission rates, with CHF and AMI as priority conditions.
■
In response to this recommendation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid developed 30-day riskstandardized readmission measures for CHF and AMI designed to measure and improve patientcare quality and decrease costs.7
Key Findings
Timely follow-up visits to a primary care provider or cardiologist are fundamental to reducing risk of readmission and should be encouraged as part of discharge planning. Elderly veterans residing in rural areas may be more susceptible to delayed treatment of CHF complications because of transportation challenges and, thus, poorer access to VA care. Veterans who use an ER for outpatient services within 30 days of discharge should be monitored closely because this might indicate the presence of higher condition severity or the receipt of care that is not optimally suited for managing chronic conditions like CHF or both; Older, rural veterans with CHF warrant special attention by VA medical staff for comprehensive discharge planning and follow-up care with primary care providers who are familiar with the patients, their medical histories, health conditions, and current treatment regimens.
1
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Timely Post-Discharge Care Reduces Readmissions for Rural Veterans with Congestive Heart Failure or Acute Myocardial Infarction
Results Prevalence of Avoidable 30-Day Readmissions ■
Of the 11,334 rural veterans hospitalized with CHF, 16.8% were readmitted.
■
Of the 4,714 rural veterans hospitalized with AMI, 14.9% were readmitted. Prevalence of Avoidable Readmissions
16.8%
14.9%
CHF
AMI
Readmission
No Readmission
Use of VA Facilities for Outpatient Services within 30 Days of Discharge ■
About two percent of CHF and AMI patients used the emergency room (ER) for outpatient services.
■
Fifty-two percent of patients with CHF used primary care.
■
Forty-six percent of patients with AMI used primary care.
■
Twenty-two percent of patients with CHF used cardiology.
■
Thirty-one percent of patients with AMI used cardiology.
Percentage of Rural Veterans with CHF and AMI Using Three Types of VA Facilities for Outpatient Services During 30-Day Period After Discharge
60 50 40 %
30 20 10
0
CHF ER
AMI
Primary Care
2
Cardiology
VHA Office of Rural Health
Policy Brief
September 2009
Avoidable Readmissions ■
The number of readmissions was reduced by more than half for CHF patients that saw a primary care physician, and by about three fourths for AMI patients.
■
The number of readmissions was reduced by nearly half for CHF patients who saw a cardiologist, and by two thirds for AMI patients.
■
ER use for outpatient services nearly doubled the risk for CHF or AMI readmission.
Percentage of Avoidable Readmissions in Rural Veterans with
Percentage of Avoidable Readmissions in Rural Veterans with
CHF and AMI that Could Have Been Eliminated by a Visit to a
CHF and AMI that Could Have Been Eliminated by a Visit to a
Primary Care Provider within 30 Days of Discharge
Cardiologist within 30 Days of Discharge
56% Eliminated
CHF
44% Eliminated
73% Eliminated
CHF
AMI
68% Eliminated
AMI
Note: Adjusted by age, eligibility, length of stay, ER outpatient use, and distance
Note: Adjusted by age, eligibility, length of stay, ER outpatient use, and distance
Demographics ■
Being aged 65 and older, having low income or a disability, or having a long hospital stay slightly increased the chance of AMI readmission.
■
Older veterans or those with low income or disability status had less of a reduction in their chance of CHF readmission if they saw a primary care provider.
■
Veterans with low income or disability status had slightly higher risk of readmission even when they saw a primary care provider within 30 days of discharge.
Methods ■
We analyzed VA Patient Treatment File data (October 2005 to September 2007) via 3M Potentially Preventable Readmission grouping software to identify 30-day readmissions for CHF and AMI that may have resulted from deficiencies in the process of care.
■
Veterans were classified as rural if their residential zip code area was located in a non-metropolitan statistical area.
■
We studied 11,334 rural veterans with CHF and 4,714 rural veterans with AMI. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of demographic and health-care factors on readmissions. Adjusted rates were estimated from these results.
3
VHA Office of Rural Health
Policy Brief
September 2009
References Rosamond, W., Flegal, K., Friday, G., et al. (2007 update). Heart disease and stroke statistics: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation,115, e69–e171. 1
Kannel, W. B., & Belanger, A. J. (1991). Epidemiology of heart failure. American Heart Journal,121, 951– 957. 2
Marcantonio, E. R., McKean, S., Goldfinger, M., et al. (1999). Factors associated with unplanned hospital readmission among patients 65 years of age and older in a Medicare managed care plan. American Journal of Medicine, 107,13–17. 3
Hunt, S. A., Baker, D. W., Chin, M. A., et al. (2002). ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplant, 21, 189–203. 4
McAlister, F. A., Lawson, F. M., Teo, K. K., et al. (2001). A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure. American Journal of Medicine,110, 378–384. 5
MedPAC. (2007, June). Promoting greater efficiency in Medicare. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun07_EntireReport.pdf. 6
QualityNet. (2008). Readmission measures overview: CMS 30-day risk-standardized heart failure readmission measure. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer?cid= 1219069855273&pagename=QnetPublic%2FPage%2FQnetTier2&c=Page. 7
4