Design of Experiment - ANSYTech

9 downloads 107 Views 764KB Size Report
Entering Data in Minitab ... Solution. Stat → DOE → Define Custom Factorial Design ... An experiment is run in a chemical process using a 32 factorial design.
Design of Experiment ANSY Tech. Inc. Muhammad Sohail Ahmed, Ph.D. Mubashir Siddiqui

© AnsyTech 2008

Day 7 Factorial Design – 3 Levels

© AnsyTech 2008

Factorial Designs § § § §

(Day 7)

2k Factorial with Center Point 32 Factorial Design 33 Factorial Design Confounding

© AnsyTech 2008

Methods to Obtain Curvature Estimate §

2k design with center points

§

3-Level Designs

§

Response Surface Method

© AnsyTech 2008

2k Factorial with Center Point k

First Order Model

y = β 0 + ∑ β jx j + j =1

∑∑ β i< j

x xj +ε

ij i

To model CURVATURE in Response Function k

k

j =1

j =1

y = β 0 + ∑ β jx j + ∑ β jjx 2j + ∑∑ β ij xi x j + ε i< j

where ßjj: pure second order or quadratic effects

B High

b A-B +

Let nc be the observations at center point (0,0) Let yF be the observations at corner points

ab

.

A+B +

(0,0)

Low

A+B -

A-B (1)

a

Low

High

A

© AnsyTech 2008

Problem Response: Yield of a chemical process Factors: Reaction Time and Reaction Temperature (a) Find significant factors, their effects. (b) Is there any evidence of curvature?

© AnsyTech 2008

Entering Data in Minitab

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution Stat à DOE à Define Custom Factorial Design

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Stat à DOE à Analyze Factorial Design

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d)

No evidence of second order curvature for the region tested © AnsyTech 2008

32 Design

Low level

Intermediate Level

High Level

© AnsyTech 2008

32 Design Model

Low level

Intermediate Level

High Level

Notice the quadratic nature of the model © AnsyTech 2008

Problem An experiment is run in a chemical process using a 32 factorial design. The design factors are temperature and pressure, and the response variable is yield. Data is shown in the table. (a) Using ANOVA, which factor has significant effects? (b) Analyze the residuals. (c) Verify that the second order model could be written, in natural variables, as y = -1335.63 + 18.56T + 8.59P – 0.072T2 – 0.0196P2 – 0.0384TP (d) Verify that if we let low, medium, and high levels be represented by -1, 0, and +1, then the second order model for yield is y = 86.81 + 10.4x1 + 8.42x2 – 7.17x12 – 7.86x22 – 7.69x1x2

Pressure (psig)

Temperature 0C

100

120

140

80

47.58, 48.77

64.97, 69.22

80.92, 72.60

90

51.86, 82.43

88.47, 84.23

93.95, 88.54

100

71.18, 92.77

96.57, 88.72

76.58, 83.04 © AnsyTech 2008

Solution Entering Data in Minitab P

T

Y

100

80

47.58

100

90

51.86

100

100

71.18

120

80

64.97

120

90

88.47

120

100

96.57

140

80

80.92

140

90

93.95

140

100

76.58

100

80

48.77

100

90

82.43

100

100

92.77

120

80

69.22

120

90

84.23

120

100

88.72

140

80

72.6

140

90

88.54

140

100

83.04

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution Solution (a) Using ANOVA, which factors are significant? Stat à ANOVA à Two-Way Select Y as response and Pressure and Temperature as Factors. Click on Graphs, Select Four in One for Residual Plots.

Pressure and Temperature are significant. Their interaction is not.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Solution (b) Analyze residuals. We will get residuals plot by selecting Four in One for Residual Plots. Residual Plots for Y Normal Probability Plot

Versus Fits

99 10 Residual

Percent

90 50 10

0 -10

1 -20

-10

0 Residual

10

20

50

60

Histogram

70 Fitted Value

80

90

Versus Order 10

4.5

Residual

Frequency

6.0

3.0 1.5 0.0

0 -10

-15

-10

-5

0 5 Residual

10

15

2

4

6 8 10 12 14 Observation Order

16

18

Residuals seem to be normally distributed in Normal Probability Plot. But the plot of residuals vs fits shows a converging nozzle. Hence there is non-constant variance.

© AnsyTech 2008

Residuals VS Fitted Values n n n n n

As the magnitude of observation increases, the variance increases. Error in measuring instrument. Data follows a non-normal or skewed § distribution. F-test is only slightly affected in balanced designs. In worse cases, data transformation is required.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Solution (c) Verify that the second order model could be written, in natural variables, as y = -1335.63 + 18.56T + 8.59P – 0.072T2 – 0.0196P2 – 0.0384TP

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Stat à Regression à Regression Select Response and Predictors.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Solution (d) Verify that if we let low, medium, and high levels be represented by -1, 0, and +1, then the second order model for yield is y = 86.81 + 10.4x1 + 8.42x2 – 7.17x12 – 7.86x22 – 7.69x1x2

Enter data in Minitab using Coded Variables representing low, medium , and high levels as -1, 0, and +1 respectively. Then get square- and product-columns as shown in C24, C25, and C26.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Stat à Regression à Regression Select Response and Predictors.

© AnsyTech 2008

3-D view Of Response y=f(T,P)

http://www.livephysics.com/ptools/online- 3 d -f u n c t i o n - grapher.php?ymin=- 1 & x m i n = - 1 & z m i n = A u t o & y m a x = 1 & x m a x = 1 & z m a xAuto&f = =86.81%2B%2810.4*x%29%2B%288.42*y%29

-% 2 8 7 . 1 * x % 5 E 2 % 2 9 -% 287.86*y%5E2%29

-% 2 8 7 . 6 9 * x * y % 2 9

© AnsyTech 2008

Same Problem Using Factorial Design Stat à DOE à Define Custom Factorial Design

© AnsyTech 2008

Same Problem Using Factorial Design Stat à DOE à Analyze Factorial Design Select Response

© AnsyTech 2008

33 Design

© AnsyTech 2008

33 Design Three factors are being studied viz bottle type, shelf type, and workers to find their effects on the time it takes to stock 10 cases on shelves. Time data is as shown here. (a) Which of the factors are significant? (b) Specify appropriate levels of factors..

© AnsyTech 2008

Entering Data in Minitab

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution Solution (a) – Significant Factors Stat à DOE à Define Custom Factorial Design Select Factors. Check ‘General Factorial Design’

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Stat à DOE à Analyze Factorial Design Select Response. Click Graphs. Select Four In One under Residuals Plot.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Residual Plots for Time Versus Fits 0.4

90

0.2 Residual

Percent

Normal Pro bability Plot 99

50 10 1 -0.50

-0.25

0.00 Residual

0.25

0.0 -0.2 -0.4

0.50

3

4

Histogram

5 Fitted Value

6

Versus Order 0.4

Residual

Frequency

8 6 4

0.0 -0.2

2 0

0.2

-0.32

-0.16

0.00 Residual

0.16

0.32

-0.4

1

5

10

15 20 25 30 35 40 Observation Order

45 50

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Solution (b) Stat à DOE à Factorial Plots Main Effects Plot for Time Data Means W orker

5.6

Bot tle Type

5.2 4.8

Mean

4.4 4.0 1

2

3

1

2

3

Shelf Type

5.6 5.2 4.8 4.4 4.0 1

2

3

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Interaction Plot for Time Data Means 1

2

3

1

2

3 6

5

Wor ker

Work er 1 2 3

4 6

5

Bo ttle T ype

Bottle Ty pe 1 2 3

4

She lf T ype

Shortest Time: Worker: 1 (or 3) Shelf Type:1

© AnsyTech 2008

Confounding

© AnsyTech 2008

Confounding n

n

n n

Block 1 (1) ab

Block 2 a b

Confounding is a design technique for arranging a complete factorial experiment in blocks, where the block size is smaller than the number of treatment combinations in one replicate. A confounding design is one where some treatment effects (main or interactions) are estimated by the same linear combination, of the experimental observations, as some blocking effects. In this case, the treatment effect and the blocking effect are said to be confounded. Thus confounding causes some information, usually about higher order interactions to be indistinguishable from blocks.

© AnsyTech 2008

Confounding Runs

A

B

Combination

1

-

-

(1)

2

+

-

a

3

-

+

b

4

+

+

ab

Assignment of four runs of a 22 Design in Two BLOCKS Block 1 (1) ab

Block 2 a b

Main effect of A = A = 21n [−(1) + a − b + ab ] Main effect of B = B = 21n [−(1) − a + b + ab ] Interaction Effect = AB = 21n [ab + (1) − a − b]

Which effects are confounded? See the SIGNS in Main and Interaction Effects. Here AB effect is confounded. © AnsyTech 2008

Problem Four factors are studied to find their effects on Filtration Rate. They are: Temperature(A), Pressure(B), Concentration of formaldehyde(C), and Stirring Rate(D). All combinations cannot be run using one batch of raw materials. So there will be two blocks. A B C D Comb Block 1 (1)=25 ab=45 ac=40 bc=60 ad=80 bd=25 cd=55 abcd=76 ABCD = +

Block 2 a=71 b=48 c=68 d=43 abc=65 bcd=70 acd=86 abd=104 ABCD = -

-1

-1

-1

-1

(1)

1

-1

-1

-1

a

-1

1

-1

-1

b

1

1

-1

-1

ab

-1

-1

1

-1

c

1

-1

1

-1

ac

-1

1

1

-1

bc

1

1

1

-1

abc

-1

-1

-1

1

d

1

-1

-1

1

ad

-1

1

-1

1

bd

1

1

-1

1

abd

-1

-1

1

1

cd

1

-1

1

1

acd

-1

1

1

1

bcd

1

1

1

1

abcd

© AnsyTech 2008

Entering Data in Minitab

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution Stat à DOE à Define Factorial Design Select Low/High and select Worksheet Data as Coded. Click on Designs, and specify the block column.

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d)

© AnsyTech 2008

Solution (cont’d) Normal Plot of the Effects (response is Y, Alpha = .05) 99 A

95 90

Percent

F actor A B C D

AD D

80

C

70 60 50 40 30

Effect Typ e No t Sig nificant Sig nific ant Nam e Tem p Pre ss C onc Rate

20 10 5 1

AC

-20

-10

0 Effect

10

20

Lenth's PSE = 3.1875

© AnsyTech 2008

End of Day 7

© AnsyTech 2008