Differential Expression of Two Distinct MyoD Genes in ... - CiteSeerX

2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Edmondson,. D. G., and. Olson ... M., Pierce, J. W., and Baltimore,. D. Protein- ... Baltimore,. D. Multiple nuclear factors interact with the immunoglobulin enhancer.
Vol.

2, 619-629,

December

Differential Xenopus1

Jon B. Scales, Department Texas

Cell

1991

Expression

Eric N. Olson,

of Biochemistry

M. D. Anderson

and Michael

and Molecular

Cancer

Center,

Biology,

Houston,

of Two

of

Texas 77030

Abstract We previously

for

reported

the isolation of several Xenopus Iaevis that encode distinct MyoD proteins. Two of these genes, XImfl and X1mf25, appear to represent a gene duplication as a consequence of the polyploid Xenopus genome. Although both MyoD genes are expressed exclusively in skeletal muscle in adult animals, they have very different temporal patterns of expression in early development. In the present work, we show that XImfl complementary

DNAs

to high

levels

1011/2 fibroblasts In addition, both

to a myogenic proteins directly

shortly

induction

in Xenopus

To whom

Biochemistry

Anderson 77030.

supported

by

NIH

grants

to M.

P. and

E. N. 0.

Cancer

Molecular

Center,

Biology,

1515

The

Holcombe

University

Boulevard,

of

hierarchy,

genes. reported

in embryogenesis,

have

referred

at a position

be-

the

identification

of two

sepa-

prior

to

expression

pseudotetraploidy

of Xenopus

polyploid

species

pairs

functionally

are

Iaevis.

have shown

of

the

differen-

similarity of the Xlmfthat observed between which suggests that they genes resulting from the Studies

with

other

that some duplicated

hemizygous,

whereas

gene

both

genes

in other pairs remain active (19). Furthermore, the expression of duplicated genes in some pairs is coordinately regulated, as seen with the Xenopus skeletal actin genes (2), whereas is independently

the expression of genes in other pairs regulated (20, 21, and references show here that the Xenopus MyoD genes

therein). We are similar to the latter class of duplicated genes based on their temporal pattern of expression. X1mf25 mRNA is a maternal transcript present throughout the early stages of development, whereas Xlmfl mRNA was not detectable until after the midblastula transition. Both XImf proteins induced myogenic conversion and transactivated

fected

a muscle-specific

mouse

regulatory

element

in trans-

fibroblasts.

Results XImfl and X1mf25 Have Different Temporal Patterns of Expression during Embryogenesis. Previous workers detected maternal Xenopus MyoD transcripts by Northern analysis using an XImfl probe (termed XMyoD; 22) and nibonuclease

protection

with

a probe

analogous

to

E. N. 0.

Investigator of the American Heart Association. requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department and

in a regulatory

tiated muscle phenotype. The encoded proteins is greater than other pairs of myogenic factors, may be products of duplicated

by

2

sequence,

genes encoding MyoD-like products, designated X!mfl and Xlmf2S (17). These genes, like myogenin and MyoD in mouse embryos (18), are expressed very early

used a host of markers to characterize at the molecular level the extracellular factors and intracellular signals involved in this process. These markers frequently correspond to genes encoding structural proteins expressed in specific cell types, such as the cardiac and skeletal muscle-specific isoforms of the actin gene family (1, 2). Recent studies of the events that regulate differentiation in cultured muscle cells have illustrated the importance of a family of transcriptional regulatory factors for expression of the skeletal muscle phenotype (reviewed in Ref. 3). Genes in this family, including MyoD (4), myogenin (5, 6), myfs (7), and MRF4 (8), are expressed exclusively

Received 5/3i/9i. 1 This work was is an Established

to a consensus

rate

trans-

embryos

binding

muscle-specific We recently

Introduction of mesoderm

in

tween the extracellular signals that initiate mesoderm induction and the expression of previously characterized

activated reporter genes linked to muscle-specific regulatory elements. XImfl was twice as active in this regard as X1mf25 and required a carboxy-terminal domain for its function. The absence of apparent effect of the maternally expressed myogenic gene in early embryos, but not in transfected fibroblasts, suggests the existence of regulatory mechanisms that repress the function of this gene in cells with nonmuscle fates during early amphibian development.

Studies

efficient

to function

genome at the midblastula transition. In contrast, X1mf25 was expressed as a maternal transcript that was maintained at a relatively constant level throughout early development. X1mf25, like XImfl, was capable of converting phenotype.

Genes

619

to as an E-box (CANNIG), found in the regulatory regions of many muscle-specific genes (10, 12, 13) and in immunoglobulin gene enhancers (14, 15). Forced expression of myogenic factors in many nonmuscle cell types results in their conversion to the muscle phenotype (4, 5, 7, 16). The myogenic regulatory gene family appears

from

transcripts rapidly accumulated after activation of the zygotic

MyoD

& Differentiation

in skeletal muscle in adults. The encoded proteins contam a highly conserved region postulated to adopt a HLH3 conformation that functions as an interface for protein-protein interactions (9, 10). The formation of heterodimers with ubiquitously expressed HLH proteins, such as the products of the E2A gene (1 1), is necessary

Perry2 The University

Distinct

Growth

Texas

Houston,

M.

The abbreviations

of

3

D.

complementary

TX

amphenicol dium

dodecyl

used are HLH, DNA;

MCK,

acetyltransferase; sulfate;

bp,

helix-loop-helix;

muscle-specific

MBS, base

pair(s).

modified

nt, nucleotide;

creatine

Barth’s

kinase;

solution;

cDNA,

CAT,

chlor-

SDS, so-

620

Differential

Expression

of Xenopus

MyoD

Genes

LI,

A

oc

LILt)

N

Flours

0)

6t

L4 9

0

-

Lt 10

-

c’,

I

L(

1

!__-

II2

i i

0.0. o

to

0

I 1

3’fi-;it-i#{244}-T-if4 i 131 MJiTsl

293-

232

#{149}1 -p

Hours

.1..

Stage

L

L-OS L-±J0

N

.

6

9



10

C’J

C’

i

Fig.

_____

Accumulation

RNA from Xlmfl-specitic

12T13I’14J27I41kfi

fl11

1.

using

an

protection

analysis

X1mf25-specific

ribo-

probe. Arrow, the resistant fragments

Xlmf25-

-

WWWWWW

w

specific

I

232-s .

w

expected

hybridization

of

embryo

equivalent

of

loaded

in

lane

stages

20 and

an

used.

Transcript

ribonuclease-

for

probes

to homologous transcripts. Lanes are indicated by stages (25) or hours after fertilization as tollows: 0, oocyte; FE, fertilized egg; 6-43, stages; M, adult muscle (5 pg); 5, synthetic RNA (iO or 50 pg, as indicated). A single

of

C

Xlmfl

embryos using an riboprobe. B, ri-

bonuclease 298.-

220-

of

and X1m125 transcripts during early development. A, ribonuclease protection analysis of total

Numbers

scripts

bar,

14-

each

one-half

equivalent

C,

quantitation

in

millions/embryo.

was

except

27, where

embryo

Xlmfi

RNA

was

bar,

IranSolid X1mf25).

fragment

was

; hatched

of

12. (0

2io

x 0. 0

U

Xnf1

0

Xfrnf2S

VS 0

I-

Stage

llours

(termed MyoDa; 23). In our previous studies, we did not detect maternal Xlmftranscripts usinga full-length Xlmfl probe under high-stringency hybridization condi-

X1m125

tions (17). To investigate nibonuclease protection that distinguish between

Fig. 1A shows specific

probe

the result and

total

this in more detail, we used a assay using gene-specific probes XImIl and X1m125 transcripts. of such an assay using the XlmflRNA from oocytes, eggs, staged

embryos,

and

protected

from

adult

leg

nuclease

muscle.

A 230-nt

digestion

after

hybridization

of

this probe with Xlmfl transcripts but not after hybnidization with X1mf25 transcripts. Notably, Xlmfl transcripts were not detected in oocytes, eggs, or preblastula embryos but were first observed at stage 10, approximately

9 h after

fertilization,

tion

initiation

and

shortly of zygotic

after

the midblastula

transcription.

The

transinumber

Cell

of transcripts

present

was quantitated

by comparison

was approximately equal embryo (stage 20).

to that

present

4IIII:III:Iiii:I-----------I#{149}---------9BS XlmfI -

in a late

B



a result

contains

including

the

binding

and

of aberrant

amino

basic

and

splicing

acids HLH

(1 7). The

1 through regions

heterodimerization.

No

transcripts

for

for

competition

of the

longer,

more

of the

abundant

message with the shorter, presumably less abundant XImfl 1 transcripts for hybridization to the riboprobe. Hybridization of the niboprobe to synthetic XImfl 1 RNA was not affected by an excess of Xlmfl RNA. Since approximately iO copies (1 pg) of synthetic XImfll RNA

was

less than iO copies/embryo. Is Myogenic and Activates Endogenous Myogenic Regulatory Genes in Mouse Fibroblasts whereas XImfl 1 Cannot. Constitutive expression of XImfl in stably

X!mf25

transfected mouse fibroblasts resulted in the formation of multinucleated cells expressing endogenous musclespecific genes (17). To investigate the myogenic activity of Xlmfl 1 and X1mf25, we assayed their ability to convert fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype. Xlm125 and Xlmfl were inserted into an expression vector as described previously for XImfl (1 7) to create peMX25 and peMXl respectively, and these plasmids were stably transfected

C3H1OT1/2

cells. expressed

These

plasmids

neomycin

also resistance

#{149}.

186nt

‘y .q

.

J

J

J

0

(12

O

#{149}.v #{231}a

Sy

4-

Xlmf

11

I,

I

contain gene,

Fig.

2.

Analysis

that stained

were easily detected with this assay, we estimate that the abundance of Xlmfl 1 transcripts, if they were present,

into

.

11

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1011

of

Xlmfl

1 expression.

A,

diagram

of

XImfl

and

X/mfl

1

thereby allowing for selection of transfectants containing stably integrated plasmids in G418-containing medium. Several cell lines expressing stably integrated X1mf25 were converted to a myogenic phenotype after differentiation in mitogen-depleted medium. These cells were characterized by the appearance of multinucleated cells

XImfl

constitutively

4.i CO

XImf Probe 336nt

cDNAs indicating the riboprobe, 9BS, used to distinguish between the two transcripts. Boxed areas, coding regions; heavy line, noncoding sequence. Solid boxes, conserved carboxy-terminal regions. The probe was produced from a cloned BamHI-Saul restriction fragment (B, BamHI; 5, Saul). A 336-nt fragment is protected by Xlmfl transcripts, whereas XImfl 1 RNA protects a 186-nt fragment. B, ribonuclease protection analysis of oocyte and embryo RNA with the 9BS probe. The Xlmfl(upper arross’) and Xlmfl 1-specific(/owerarrow)fragmentsare indicated. Synthetic Xlmul (Lane 8, 10 pg) and Xlmfl 1 (Lane 9, 1 pg) RNAs were used as positive controls. Lane 10 contains a mixture of 10 pg Xlmfl and 1 pg Xlmfl 1 RNA. Lane 1 shows nonspecific fragments arising from incomplete digestion of the probe. The bands visible between those indicated as Xlmul and Xlmfl 1 arise from incomplete digestion products, as does the larger band (396 nt) present in every lane.

DNA

size expected from XImfl 1 were previously detected by Northern analysis. We therefore assayed for the presence ofXlmfl 1 transcripts using nibonuclease protection assays with RNA from oocytes, gastrulae, neurulae, and swimming tadpoles. A niboprobe was used that spans the 3’ breakpoint between the XIm(l and XImfl 1 cDNAs, thereby allowing the specific detection of each transcript (Fig. 2A). Hybridization of XImfl 1 RNA to this probe should protect a 186-nt fragment from subsequent ribonuclease digestion. This fragment was not observed with any of the endogenous RNA samples even though hybridization to Xlmfl transcripts was apparent (Fig. 2B, Lanes 3-7). Synthetic XImfl and Xlmfl 1 RNAs were analyzed separately (Lanes 8 and 9) and together (Lane 10)

to test

0

(5,

I

encoded

178 of Xlmf 1,

necessary

.

0

k

stage 24 cDNA library (17). We previously reported the nucleotide sequence of a third cDNA, Xlmul 1, that is identical in sequence to XImfl except for the deletion of nucleotides 658 through 1009, protein

(

F.’

621

Xlmf

Xlmfll

4) O”vO

V

In contrast to the expression of Xlmfl, X1mf25 transcripts were present in oocytes, in fertilized eggs, and in early cleavage stages (Fig. 1B) well before the detection of Xlmfl transcripts. The number of X1mf25 transcripts was relatively constant (approximately 1 x 106 copies/ embryo) from fertilization through late gastrula (stage 1 1 Y2), increased 2-3-fold by stage 20, and then decreased (Fig. 1C). The relative amount of the Xlmf transcripts between stages 20 and 27 corresponded approximately with the relative abundance of these cDNAs in a

potentially

& Differentiation

A

of

the amount of probe protected in each sample to that protected by predetermined amounts of synthetic sense RNA. An appreciable amount (1 0 copies/embryo) of the Xlmfl mRNA was detected in midgastrula-stage embryos (stages 1 0-1 0Y2). The number of Xlmfl transcripts steadily increased, reaching a maximum of 1.4 x iO copies by stage 20, and then subsequently decreased. The amount ofXImfl mRNA in 5 jzg of cellular RNA from adult skeletal

muscle neurula

Growth

1

1, a

with

a myosin-specific

monoclonal

antibody

(Fig. 3). We obtained no cell lines stably expressing the XImul 1 cDNA that also converted to a myogenic phenotype even after prolonged culture in differentiation medium. Transcripts of the size expected for expression of the exogenous X1mf25 and XImfl 1 genes were present in the corresponding cell lines (Fig. 4). The myogenic conversion of fibroblasts by X1mf25 and apparent lack of conversion by Xlmul 1 was further characterized at the molecular level by examining the comesponding cell lines for expression of the endogenous myogenic regulatory genes MyoD and myogenin. RNA obtained from representative cell lines expressing XImfl (TX.2), X1mf25 (TX25.8), and XImfl 1 (TX.1), cultured under proliferative and differentiation conditions, was subjected to Northern analysis. The forced expression of XImul and X1mf25 was clearly capable of activating expression of both endogenous myogenic factors when

622

Differential

Expression

of Xenopus

MyoD

Genes

fig. .3. Conversion of 1OT1/2 fibroblasts after stable transfection with Xlmf25. A, phase-contrast photomicrograph of difterentiated TX25.8 cells stably expressing Xlmf2S showing the formation of myotubes. B, immunofluorescence photomicrograph of same field as A, showing expression of skeletal muscle-specific genes as demonstrated by staining with an anti-skeletal myosin heavy-chain antibody.

cells were allowed to differentiate (Fig. 4, Lanes 1-4). We did not detect expression of endogenous muscle regulatory genes in proliferating TX2 or TX2.8 cells or in cells expressing Xlmfl 1 after exposure to differentiation medium for up to 8 days (Fig. 4, Lanes 5-7). XImfl 1 contains the regions (basic and HLH) shown to be sufficient for myogenic conversion by MyoD (24); however, it lacks the carboxy-terminal 1 1 0 amino acids of Xlmfl , containing instead 1 1 amino acids that are not present in either Xlmfl or Xlmf25. The present results suggest that the camboxy terminus of Xlmfl is necessary for myogenic conversion of mouse fibroblasts, perhaps reflecting a required interaction of this region of the amphibian protein with the mouse transcriptional apparatus. Studies using fusions between the Gal 4 DNA-binding domain

and

4

regions

1. ShwartL

from

myf5

and E. Olson,

(25) and myogenin4

nianuscript

in preparation.

have

led to

the conclusion that a transcriptional activation domain is present in the carboxy termini of these muscle factors. Interestingly, two conserved regions rich in senine and

threonine and HLH

residues are present downstream of the basic regions in myf5, MyoD, Xlmfl, and X1mf25. The

latter region of homology is also present in myogenin (26) and MRF4 but is absent from XImfll; the absence of this evolutionarily conserved region may contribute to the inactivity of XImfl 1 . We did not independently assay the expression of the Xlmfl 1 protein. It is possible that this protein is susceptible to rapid degradation under

differentiation inactivity. Xlmfl

thereby

contributing

to

its

XImf25 Can Bind and Activate the Murine The previous experiments showed that XImfl and X1mf25 both convert nonmuscle cells to a myogenic phenotype. In each case, myogenic conversion was accompanied by activation of the endogenous myogenic factors MyoD and myogenin. To determine whether XImfl, XImfll, and X1mf25 were capable of

MCK

and

conditions,

Enhancer.

Cell Growth

Tx1_.2

Tx25__8

DG

G

Tx11-3

D

623

C2

00

G

& Differentiation

GD

XLMF

18S>

MoD

18S>

2\..

.

,

,

-.

MYOGENIN

18S>

1

activating

regulatory

the

element

trans-activation

transiently

and

expression

potentials, XImf reporter

well-characterized sensitive

MCK assay

myogenic factors vate cotransfected muscle-specific

of

a muscle-specific

to quantitatively

expressed

of a cotransfected This

5

4

their

we measured the ability of genes to activate expression gene under the control of the

promoter

has been

compare

used

and enhancer to show

that

(27, 28). different

vary remarkably in their ability to actireporter genes under the control of regulatory

elements

(29)

and

to

define

positive control mutations in myogenin that prevent myogenesis without affecting DNA binding (30). In the absence of a cotransfected muscle regulatory factor, the MCK transcriptional regulatory elements were inactive in fibroblasts,

and

and B). Expression cDNAs

6

7

of endogenous myogenic factors in C3H1OT1/2 cells stably expressing medium for 4 days (D) were analyzed for expression of the transfected from cells expressing XlmIl (TX,.2, Lanes 1 and 2), Xlmf2S (TX25.8, Lanes RNA in Lane 7 was isolated from TX,, , cells maintained in differentiation

Fig. 4. Activation in differentiation RNA was isolated (Lanes 8 and 9).

directly

23

resulted

CAT

activity

was

not

of either the XImfl, in the transcriptional

detected X1mf25, activation

(Fig.

5, A

or MyoD of the

89

Xenopus MyoD cDNAs. Proliferating cells (C) and cells placed cDNA (XImf( and endogenous factors (MyoD and myogenin(. 3 and 4), and Xlmfl 1 (TX,,.3, Lanes 5-7), and from C2 myoblasts medium for 8 days.

MCK enhancer as demonstrated by an increase in CAT activity. XImfl reproducibly showed approximately 2-fold greater trans-activation of the reporter gene than either X1m125 or MyoD. Analysis of RNA from parallel transfections showed that XImfl and Xlmf25 transcripts were present at similar levels (data not shown). In contrast, expression of Xlmul 1 did not activate transcription of the

MCK-CAT

reporter

of its inability

gene;

to induce

this was not surprising myogenic

fibroblasts. The expression

of the

ogenin genes was tures by Northern

examined analysis

conversion

endogenous in parallel (Fig. SC).

in light of mouse

MyoD and mytransfected culSince transcripts

from neither gene were detected, we concluded that the amphibian myogenic factors XImfl and X1mf25 most likely

activated

The possibility

the

MCK

that Xlmfl

regulatory

1 might

elements

negatively

directly.

regulate

the

624

Differential

Expression

of Xenopus

MyoD

Genes

ability

A

tested

1.2

of 1.0

0.8

0 V > 0 V

XImf25

to activate

the

MCK

enhan-

for cotransfecting

the

MCK-CAT

reporter

the XImfl 1 expression vector and either XImfl In these tests, XImfl 1 did not affect the ability

either

Xlmfl

enhancer

(data

or

X1mf25

to

trans-activate

the

MCK

not shown).

Xlmfl-E12 and X1mf25-E12 Heterodimers Have Different Abilities to Interact with DNA. The differential trans-activation potentials shown by XImfl and X1mf25 with respect to the MCK enhancer could be based on several properties, including differences in their ability to

U I-

and

as above

gene with or Xlmf25.

>‘

>

of XImfl

cer, by competing either for oligomenization with a cellular partner or for binding to the MCK enhancer, was

0.6

form

0.4

complexes

elements 0.2

in

binding None

XImfl

Xtmfl

1

X1mf25

MyoD

.

properties

of

the

C...

E-box

synthetic

DNA-binding

however,

all three

0

5

1234

6

‘;j’,

less efficiently

the MCK

proteins

complexes

with

capable

of binding

de-

this site (Fig. 6A); this

sequence

and Xlmf25-E12

of the amount

of probe

bound

in the

absence of competitor suggests that Xlmfl-E12 complexes bind more efficiently to the MCK E-box than the corresponding complexes containing X1mf25 (Fig. 6B, Lanes 1 and 5). In the absence of competitor, the amount

of probe

bound

by the complexes

containing

XImfl

was

for

the

observed

differences

in trans-

ence of a vast excess (l000x) of the homologous unlabeled oligonucleotide (Fig. 7A). This kinetic property can be determined independently of the ability of the MyoD proteins required complexes

plexes

to interact with E12. We found that the time for dissociation of 50% ofthe X1mf25-containing (1 .7 mm) was slightly faster than for the com-

with

XImfl

(2.6

mm).

These

from the slope of the linear fit through Fig. 7A, are similar to results obtained

C2 myohlasts

might

as a I)ositive

(28).

formed

reduced binding may contribute to 1 to function in the previous assays.

11g. 5. Trans-activation of MCK-CAT reporter constructs by transient expression of XIrnl genes in C3H1OT1/2 cells. A, graph of CAT activities normalized with respect to pSV2CAT activity. B, autoradiograph of a representative CAT assay. Lane 1 , no trans-activator; Lane 2, XImtl ; Lane 3, Xlnifi 1 ; Lane 4, XImf25; Lane 5, moose MyoD; and Lane 6, pSV2CAT. C, Northern analysis (if RNA from parallel transtections of peMXi , peMX1 1, PeMX25, and peM34O (MyoD) analyzed for expression of the endogenous Slyol) and myogenin genes. Total RNA from differentiated luded

enhancer

alone

of

activation. Altered DNA binding could be a consequence of a difference in the ability of the Xlmf proteins to form heterodimens with E12, an altered affinity of Xlmf-E12 complexes for the binding site, or both. We first determined the relative affinity of both XImf-E12 oligomeric complexes for the MCK E-box by measuring the rates of dissociation of the protein-DNA complexes in the pres-

‘1i.;;;

ifl(

DNA-

performed

amounts corresponding

than the XImfl-E12

This of Xlmfl

be responsible

.

MYOGENIN

was

we

approximately 50% greater than the amount bound by those containing X1mf25, which is consistent with their relative abilities to trans-activate the MCK-CAT reporter gene. This similarity suggested that a difference in the DNA-binding abilities between Xlmfl and X1mf25 could

#{149}ya?

it.

from

XImf

were

A comparison

.,

proteins,

the labeled probe was inhibited by increasing amounts of the unlabeled homologous oligonucleotide [shown for Xlmfl (Lanes 2-4) and X1mf25 (Lanes 6-8)]. The XImfl 1E12 heterodimers interacted with the MCK E-box motif heterodimers. the inability

C

Xlmf

regulatory

investigate

assays using equimolar and an oligonucleotide

tectable

much

C

To

upon the addition of synthetic E12, presumably as a consequence of the formation of heterodimers (Fig. 6B, Lanes 1, 5, and 9). The binding of these complexes to

S..

0

to muscle-specific

enhancer.

of the

to the downstream None

bind

MCK

gel mobility shift synthetic proteins

Transoctivator

B

that the

control

(Lane

5).

(31) slightly

and

indicate greater

MCK downstream To investigate have

that affinity

XImfl-E12 (approximately

values,

calculated

the data points in for mouse MyoD

complexes 1 .5-fold)

have for

a the

E-box than XImf25-E12 complexes. the possibility that Xlmfl and X1mf25

different

interaction

efficiencies

with

the

Cell

A

Fig. 6. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using synthetic proteins and a MCK E-box binding site. A, synthetic Xlmfi, XImf25, XImfll, and E12 proteins (Lanes 2-5, respectively) were incubated individually with a labeled oligonucleotide containing the downstream E-box motif from the murine MCK enhancer. Synthetic MyoD and E12 incubated together after translation generated a complex that binds to the E-box probe Lane 6). Proteins synthesized from BMV RNA did not bind to the probe (Lane 1).

B

Growth

& Differentiation

625

t)

Ic.’I

ZYc’%d

5’7

5’;7

.#{231}*

p

31030

0

31030

:C

B, synthetic Xlmfl, X1mt25, and Xlmfl 1 proteins were incubated with synthetic E12 and the MCK E-box probe (Lanes 1-9). Increasing amounts of the homologous unlabeled oligonucleotide were added to the reactions contaming Xlmfl Lanes 2-4) and X1mf25 (Lanes 6-8). The mass ratio of competitor to probe is indicated above each lane (:C).

123456

heterodimer

partner

E12, we

measured

123456789

the amount

of

DNA-binding complex formed at various concentrations of XImf and a constant amount of E12. Since Xlmfl and Xlmf25 do not bind the MCK E-box motif in the absence of E12, the amount of DNA-binding complexes at different concentrations of XImf should be proportional to the ability of each protein to interact with El 2. A protein that interacts strongly with E12 should form a DNA-binding

complex at a lower concentration than a protein that interacts with El2 less efficiently. The amount of probe bound in each reaction was normalized to the maximum amount bound and plotted as a function of the amount of synthetic Xlmf protein added (Fig. 7B). When analyzed

in this

manner,

XImfl

and Xlmf25

in their ability to form heterodimers The maximum amount of probe was 1.4 times the amount bound ing the relative affinities of these (Fig. 7A). Taken together, the results of gest that the observed difference E12 complexes to the E-box motif

in protein-DNA

interactions

interactions.

the

basic

XImfl

and

and

HLH

and heterodimer nation for their E12. Differences

appeared

these experiments sugin binding of the Xlmfis due to a difference

rather

X1mf25

domains

equivalent

with synthetic E12. bound by Xlmfl-E12 by X1mf25-E12, reflectcomplexes for this site

then

are

that

formation. This ability to interact in DNA binding

protein-protein

highly

mediate

conserved

DNA

in

binding

provides a facile explaindistinguishably with may be due to amino

Discussion The present study shows that two distinct genes encoding similar MyoD-like proteins are unexpectedly differentially expressed during development. X1m125 transcripts were present in oocytes, eggs, and early embryos, whereas Xlmfl transcripts did not accumulate until after

activation

of zygotic

transcription

at the midblastula

tran-

sition. The biphasic expression of the Xenopus MyoD genes in early development is the consequence of the overlapping patterns of expression of XImfl and XIm 125. These results reconcile our previous studies (17) with those of Hopwood et a!. (22) and Harvey (23), who also showed the presence of a low level of maternal MyoD transcripts in oocytes and early embryos. A largely random distribution of maternal MyoD transcripts to daughter cells could account for the unlocalized distribution of this mRNA in blastula embryos (23). In addition, these groups demonstrated that the initiation of zygotic MyoD transcription requires the induction of mesoderm and is restricted to cells that will subsequently form somites. Maternal MyoD transcripts and multiple MyoD genes have not been found in other animals; however, there is precedent for differential regulation of apparently duplicate genes in Xenopus (32). It is likely that the Xenopus MyoD genes are a consequence of a genomic duplication (20) rather than products of variant alleles.

The mechanism

underlying

the differential

expression

to the F-box motif than either XImf-E12 or X1mf25-E12 oligomers. Although it is not known whether this difference is due to altered protein-protein interactions or protein-DNA interactions, the fact that XImfl and XImfl 1

of the Xenopus MyoD genes is not known. Activation of zygotic MyoD transcription occurs at the right time and in the appropriate cells for its participation in the activation of muscle genes in developing somites. The kinetics of accumulation of zygotic MyoD transcripts suggest that their synthesis is initiated with, or very soon after, activation of zygotic transcription at the midblastula transition. Therefore, the temporal and spatial regulation of MyoD transcription in developing embryos appears to be

are identical

throughout

their

a consequence

suggests that ability to bind

the XImfl DNA.

carboxy

acid and

acid

differences X1mf25

region).

that

(four

exist

in the

nonidentical

XImfll-E12

basic

residues

oligomems

region in this

bind

basic

and

terminus

of XImf 1 20-amino

less efficiently

HLH

domains

enhances

its

ably and

include nonmuscle

of localized muscle-specific trans-acting

maternal

factors

that presum-

transcriptional mepressors. These

activators observa-

626

Differential

Expression

of Xenopus

Myot)

Genes

A 0

C 0 fig. 7. Analysis of DNA-binding properties of Xlmfi-E12 and Xlmt25-E12 complexes. A, rates of dissociation in the presence of 1000-fold molar excess of oligo-

10

.0

0 L

0 >

nucleotide

were

0 0

5.0

Time

(mm)

competitor.

removed

reaction

Xlmfl

0

Xlmf25

70

ucts

after

normalizing

electrophoresis

on

gels

and

to methionine

con-

tent. The perentage of probe bound relative to the 1:1 ratio for XImf:E12 was plotted versus the proportion of Xlmt in the reaction. 0, Xlmtl; #{149}, Xlmf25.

II,

I0 >

2 sl of syn0.5, 1, or or Xlmf25, giving 0, 0.25,

SDS-polyacrylamide

60

50 0

0

and

relative molar ratios of 0, 0.125:1, 0.25:1, 0.5:1, and 1:1, respectively. The relative amounts of each protein were determined iy measuring the amount of [‘5Slmethionine incorporated into translation prod-

80 C

contained Ei2

2 MI of Xlmti

go

-U

1, 1.5, 2,

2.5, and 5 mm after addition of the homologous oligonucleotide competitor and analyzed with the gel mobility shift assay (inset). The percentage of probe bound at each time point relative to the zero time point was plotted versus time. 0, XImfl; 0, XImf25. B, efficiencies of heterodimerization of Xenopuc MyoD proteins with E12. Each binding thetic

100

Aliquots

0, 0.5,

30

o.0

0.2

Ratio XImf/E12

tions suggest a scenario that might account for the differential expression of the Xenopus MyoD genes. We suggest that the maternally expressed gene has escaped the negative control that normally prevents MyoD transcrip-

tion in nonmuscle cells, perhaps of a negative regulatory element. acting factor that by studies with

however, MyoD

cannot

represses somatic

by deletion or mutation The existence of a trans-

MyoD expression cell hybrids (33).

be sufficient

to account

is suggested This alone,

for maternal

transcription because of the strict muscle-specific of Xlm125 in adult tissues. Therefore, we furthem suggest that a maternal transcriptional activator, required for MyoD expression in embryos, may accu-

expression

mulate scniption

during oogenesis and result in the selective tranof Xlm125 in oocytes. Zygotic MyoD transcnip-

tion would presumably require the activity ofthe positive maternal activator and the removal of negative control. Forced

expression

of mammalian

a variety of nonmuscle battery of muscle-specific myogenic

factors

(34).

myogenic

factors

in

cells induces expression of a genes, including endogenous It has been

autoregulation of MyoD expression mitment to the myogenic pathway

suggested

that

positive

is important by allowing

for commainteof MyoD and MyoD genes

nance and amplification of the expression other myogenic factors (34). Both Xenopus display the functions generally described for their

mam-

Cell Growth

malian counterparts. Expression of the Xenopus MyoD cDNAs in stably transfected mouse fibroblasts results in expression of the muscle phenotype upon differentiation, including the formation of multinucleated myotubes, expression of muscle-specific gene products, and activation of endogenous myogenic regulatory genes. In transient assays, the Xenopus MyoD genes are capable of directly trans-activating the murine MCK enhancer. Although X!mfl displayed a slightly greater trans-activation potential than XImf2S, suggesting that there may be functional differences between these proteins, the major conclusion from these studies is that both Xenopus genes are clearly capable of initiating myogenesis. Because XImf2S is myogenic when expressed

muscle

mouse

suggests

that

cells,

its presence

regulatory

mechanisms

MyoD

as a maternal prevent

RNA

MyoD

ac-

tivity in the precursors of cells with nonmuscle fates during early development. Recent studies provide evidence for positive regulation of MyoD activity in developing embryos. Hopwood and Gurdon (35) showed that ectopic expression of MyoD (X!mfl ) in Xenopus embryos activated muscle-specific actin transcription in ectodermal cells that do not normally form muscle but did not induce myogenesis or otherwise alter embryonic development.

These

absence

from

essential

for complete

regulation

results

were

ectodermal

myogenesis.

of myogenic

studies with cultured or certain peptide

interpreted

to

cells of a positive Evidence

factor

cells. growth

indicate

factor

activity

the

that is

for negative

has come

High concentrations factors, including

from

of serum fibroblast

growth factor and transforming growth factor 13, can block muscle cell differentiation and the activity of constitutively expressed myogenic factors in cultured cells through

a mechanism

that

may

involve

the

dominant

(17).

initial

ume

of water-saturated

and

transforming

growth

Xenopus

dichotomy positive

embryos

(38, reviewed

suggests signals

for

that, inducing

in Ref.

in addition a subset

role in the muscle in

39). This

apparent

to functioning of ectodermal

as cells

to become mesoderm, peptide growth factors might inhibit MyoD activity in the early embryo and thereby allow the continued proliferation of nonmuscle lineages. It should

be

pointed

out

that

the

timing

and

sites

of

MyoD protein synthesis during amphibian development are unknown; it is possible that MyoD synthesis is translationally regulated so that the maternal MyoD mRNA is not expressed before mesoderm induction. In view of the ability of MyoD to activate its own expression, it will be interesting to investigate whether translation of the maternal MyoD mRNA precedes zygotic activation of MyoD transcription.

extraction

by the addition

T3 RNA transcripts

factor

and Methods

Embryo Studies. Adult Xenopus females (from Xenopus!, Ann Arbor, Ml) were primed for ovulation by injection with 500-100 units of pregnant mare serum (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) into the dorsal lymph sac followed 1 day later by injection with 500 units of human chorionic gonadotropin (Sigma). Eggs were manually stripped on the third day and fertilized with a suspension

was

isolated

from

performed

phenol

of 0.5 volume

X/mf25-specific

cloned initiation

oocytes

and

by adding

with

vortexing,

of chloroform

and

0.5

vol-

followed a second

probe

(25Sty)

was

prepared

from

a

genomic fragment that spans the transcription site by digestion with Styl and transcription with polymerase. from the

This probe hybridizes to X!m125 transcription initiation site to nucleo-

tide 163 of the sequence reported previously for this clone (17). The 9BS probe used to distinguish between XImfl and XImfl 1 transcripts was made by subcloning a fragment of XImfl between the BamHl site and Saul sites into

pBluescript.

This

template

was

digested

with

Xbal

and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase. Protection of this probe by XImfl RNA generates a 336-nt fragment, whereas the XImfl 1 transcript protects a 186-nt fragment. Antisense RNA probe synthesis and ribonuclease protection assays were performed essentially as described

by Krieg (42). Briefly, probes were synthesized in a meaction containing 1 zg of template DNA-10 mi dithiothreitol-0.1 mg/mi bovine serum albumin-40 mt’i TrisHCI, pH 7.5-6 mM MgCl2-2 m’i spemmidine-40 units RNAsin-500 MM each GTP, CTP, ATP-10 fLM UTP-35 zCi [a-32P]UTP-20 units of T3 or T7 bacteriophage RNA polymerase. for 1 h at

Materials

was

vortexing. A phenol:chloroform (1:1) solution was used for subsequent extractions. Nucleic acids were precipitated by the addition of 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 2.5 volumes of 95% ethanol. The resulting pellet was resuspended in homogenization buffer without proteinase K and extracted once with phenol-chloroform and once with chloroform. After precipitation as described above, the resulting nucleic acid pellet was washed in 70% ethanol and resuspended in sterile water. Ribonuclease Protection Analysis. The plasmid 9Apa, containing nucleotides 98-331 of the XImfl cDNA, was used to prepare an X/mIl-specific riboprobe by digestion with EcoRl and transcription with T3 RNA polymerase.

of the

growth

RNA

The

The

fibroblast

Total

staged embryos by homogenization in 50 m&i Tris-HCI, pH 7.5-50 mM NaCl-5 mi EDTA-0.5% SDS-400 ig/ml proteinase K. The homogenate was extracted three times with phenol:chloroform (1:1), and once with chloroform.

negative inhibitor of differentiation, Id (36), or postsynthetic modifications that inhibit trans-activation without affecting DNA binding (37). Interestingly, growth factors factor f families are thought to play a pivotal specification of mesoderm and, subsequently,

627

of frog sperm in MBS (40). Fertilized eggs were dejellied in 2.5% i-cysteine-0.6% Tris, pH 7.9, and then washed extensively in MBS. Approximately 5 h after fertilization, embryos were placed in 0.lx MBS. Developmental stages were determined according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (41). Embryos at desired developmental stages were transferred to plastic microcentrifuge tubes, and the excess fluid was removed; they were then quickly frozen on dry ice. Frozen embryos were stored at -80#{176} C until further use. RNA Isolation. Total cellular RNA was isolated from adult frog tissues and cultured cells as described previously

in non-

& Differentiation

Synthesis 4#{176}C.The

reactions template

were allowed to proceed DNA was removed by

treatment with DNase I, and the full-length probe was obtained by isolation from a 5% acrylamide-50% urea gel. For each RNA sample, 2-5 X iO cpm of probe were used. For all assays involving embryo RNA, one embryo equivalent of RNA was used unless otherwise indicated. Cell Culture and DNA Transfection. C3H 1OT1 /2 fibroblasts (43) and C2 cells (44) were maintained in Dulbecco’s

modified

Eagle’s

medium

supplemented

with

20%

628

Differential

Expression

fetal bovine cloned into vided

of Xenopus

Genes

MyoD

serum. The X!mfl 1 and X!mf2S the expression vector peM33O

by S. Pearson-White

and

C. Emerson)

cDNAs (kindly

were pro-

as previously

described for Xlmf (17). These vectors, designated peMXl peMXl 1 and peMX25, were transfected separately into 1OT1/23 cells, and clones harboring stably integrated plasmids were selected by their resistance to G4l8. Duplicate 15-cm dishes were transfected; clones were isolated from one dish while its duplicate was placed in differentiation medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium with 2% horse serum) and later immunostained for the presence of myosin heavy chain as described previously (1 7). The expanded clones obtained for pmMXl 1 and pmMX25 were also immunostained for ,

myosin

,

heavy

chain

after

exposure

to differentiation

me-

dium. Trans-activation of MCK gene regulatory elements was performed with pCKCATE4, a CAT reporter gene fused to 246 bp of the MCK promoter with a 300-bp region of the MCK enhancer, from -1351 to -1050, inserted into the BamHl site downstream of the CAT gene (15). The expression plasmids peMXl, peMX25, peMXll, and peM34O (MyoD) were cotransfected with pCKCATE4 into duplicate cultures of lOTl/2 cells, and the cells were placed in differentiation medium 16-20 h after transfection. Forty-eight h later, the cells were hamvested; extracts were prepared from one set of dishes for measurement of CAT activity (1 5), and RNA was purified from

the

other

set of dishes

to analyze

expression

of the

transfected In Vitro

and endogenous myogenic factors. Transcription and Translation. The plasmids pBS/XImul, pBS/XImfl 1, and pBS/X1m125 were previously described (17). The E12-containing plasmid was a gift of C. Murre and D. Baltimore (9). RNA was synthesized in a l00-zl reaction volume for 1 h at 37#{176}C using 1 zg of linearized DNA and T3 or T7 RNA polymerase, as appropriate, in the presence of RNAsin and mRNA cap analogue (New England Biolaboratories, Beverly, MA). Proteins were produced by in vitro translation of synthetic RNA using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega, Madison, WI) in a 50-zl reaction. A 5-zl aliquot of each translation reaction was incubated with 10 zCi of [35S] methionine. The synthesis of radiolabeled proteins was analyzed by electrophoresis on 10% acrylamide-SDS gels and subsequently quantitated by scanning the dried gel with a Betascope model 603 blot analyzer (Betagen, Waltham, MA) to determine the relative amounts of protein produced in each translation reaction. The unlabeled portion of each translation reaction was used in DNA-binding

assays.

DNA-binding taming

the

Assays. downstream

A 30-bp E-box

oligonucleotide in

the

MCK

conenhancer

(underlined below) was formed by annealing two singlestranded 26-bp oligonucleotides and filling the ends with Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and [a-32P]dATP. One strand of this oligonucleotide has sequence 5’AGCTTCCCCCAACACCTGCTGCCTGAAGCT. Binding reactions were performed in a total volume of 20 zl consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5-50 mti NaCI-1 m&i dithiothreitol-1 mi EDTA-5% glycerol-i ag of polydeoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic

acid

(Pharmacia,

Piscataway,

NJ)-l-3 MI of synthetic protein-i-2 X i0 cpm oligonucleotide probe. Components were incubated together for 5 mm, probe was added, and the incubation continued for an additional 20 mm. Reticulocyte lysates contaming Xlmfs and E12 were premixed for 5-10 mm at

room temperature before adding to the binding reaction. The Teactions were loaded onto 6% acrylamide-0.3% bis-acrylamide-0.5x TBE (0.5x TBE is 45 mti Tris-45 mri boric acid-l mM EDTA) gels and electrophoresed at 150 V. For the kinetic determinations, DNA binding reactions were assembled as above except that 1000-fold molar excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide was added to the reaction after the 20-mm incubation with labeled DNA. Aliquots were removed at timed intervals and immediately loaded onto a running gel. Quantitation was performed on dried gels as described above. Acknowledgments We thank D. Lu for isolating and sequencing Xlmf2S genomic sequences, S. Jassar for performing tissue culture, and Bill Klein and craig Hinkley for comments on the manuscript. Oligonucleotides were synthesized in the Macromolecular Synthesis Facility at M. D. Anderson cancer center.

References 1. Mohun, 1. J., Brennan, S., Dathan, N., Fairman, S., and Gurdon, J. B. Cell type-specific activation of actin genes in the early amphibian embryo. Nature (Lond.), 31 1: 716-721, 1984. 2.

Mohun,

actin

1. J., Garret,

N., Stutz,

F., and

gene

Xenopus

is expressed during laevis. J. Mol. Biol., 202:

3. Olson,

E. N. MyoD

Dev., 4: 1454-1461,

4. Davis, transfected

family:

early 67-76,

Spohm,

G. A third

development 1988.

a paradigm

striated

in the

muscle

amphibian

for development?

Genes

&

1990.

R. L., Weintraub, cDNA converts

H., and Lassar, A. B. Expression of a single fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell, 51: 987-1000,

1987. 5.

Edmondson,

D.

myc similarity region sufficient to activate 3: 628-640, i989.

G.,

and

Olson,

of MyoDl the muscle

E. N.

A gene

is expressed differentiation

with

Wright, W. E., Sassoon, D., and Lin, V. K. Myogenin, myogenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD. i989.

6.

7.

Braun,

1.,

Buschhausen-Denker,

C.,

Arnold, H. H. A novel human muscle MyoDi induces myogenic conversion 709, 1989. 8. Rhodes, S. J., and Konieczny, member of the muscle regulatory 2050-206i,

homology

to

during myogenesis program. Genes

Bober,

E.,

the

and is & Dev.,

a factor regulating Cell, 56: 607-617, Tannisch,

E.,

and

factor related to but distinct from in 1011/2 cells. EMBO J., 8: 701 -

S. F. Identification factor gene family.

of MRF4: a new Genes & Dev., 2:

1989.

9. Murre, C., McCaw, C., and Baltimore, D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell, 56: 777-783, 1989. 10. Murre, C., McCaw, P. 5., Vaessin, H., Caudy, M., Jan, L. Y., Jan, Y. N., Cabrera, C. V., Buskin, J. N., Hauschka, S. D., Lassar, A. B., Weintraub, H., and Baltimore, D. Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence. Cell, 58: 537-544, 1989. 11. tion

Sun, X-H., and Baltimore, D. An inhibitory domain factor prevents DNA binding in E12 homodimers

heterodimers. 12.

Brennan,

Cell,

64: 459-470,

1. 1. and

Olson,

of Ei2 transcripbut

not

in

E12

1991. E. N. Myogenin

acquires high affinity for a conserved ization. Genes & Dev., 4: 582-595,

enhancer 1990.

resides

in the

element

nucleus

and

on hetemodimer-

i3. Lassar, A. B., Buskin, J. N., Lockshon, D., Davis, R. L., Apone, S., Hauschka, S. D., and Weintraub, H. MyoD is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein requiring a region of myc homology to bind to the muscle creatine kinase enhancer. Cell, 58: 823-831, 1988. 14. Lenardo, M., Pierce, J. W., and Baltimore, D. Protein-binding sites in Ig gene enhancers determine transcriptional activity and inducibility. Science (Washington DC), 236: 1573-1577, 1987. 1 5.

Sen.

R., and

immunoglobulin

Baltimore,

enhancer

D. Multiple

sequences.

nuclear

factors

Cell, 46: 705-716,

interact

with

the

1986.

16. Weintraub, H., Tapscott, S. I., Davis, R. L., Thayer, M. J., Adam, M. A., Lassar, A. B., and Miller, D. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 5434-5438, 1989.

Cell Growth

17. Scales, with

J. B., Olson,

homology

E. N., and Perry,

M. Two distinct

to MyoDl

embryogenesis.

Mol.

are expressed before Cell. Biol., 10: 1516-1524,

somite

Xenopus genes formation in early

1990.

18. Sassoon, 0., Lyons, G., Wright, W. E., Lin, v., Lassar, A., Weintraub, H., and Buckingham, M. Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoDi during mouse embryogenesis. Nature (Lond.), 341: 303-307, 1989. 19.

Ferris,

idisation.

S. D., and Whitt, Nature

(Lond.),

256:

G. S. Loss of gene 258-260, 1977.

20. Kobel, H. R., and Pasquier, 1. D. Genetics TrendsGenet., 2:310-315, 1986. 21.

expression

after

of polyploid

Whitt,

G. S. Evolution of isozyme loci and their differential and J. L. Reveal (eds.), Evolution Today, of the Second International Congress of Systematic and Biology, pp. 271-289. University of British Columbia, 1981. In: G. G. E. Scudder

22. the

Hopwood, N. D., Pluck, A., and Gurdon, I. B. MyoD forming somites is an early response to mesoderm Xenopus embryos. EMBO I., 8: 3409-3417, 1989.

23. Harvey, R. P. The Xenopus mRNA predates lineage restricted velopment, 108: 669-680, 1990.

32.

in in

MyoD gene: an unlocalised maternal expression in the early embryo. De-

D. G., and Olson,

E. N. corrigendum.

Genes

& Dev.,

Gossett, 1. A., Kelvin, 0. J., Sternberg, E. A., and Olson, E. N. A new myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor recognizes a conserved element associated with multiple muscle-specific genes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9: 27.

5022-5033,

1989.

29.

Yutzey,

ogenin

K. E., Rhodes, associated

and NRF4.

with

Mol.

cell.

S. J., and the

Konieczny,

muscle regulatory Biol., 10: 3934-3944,

S. F. Differential factors

MyoDl,

1989.

35. Hopwood, N. D., and Gurdon, J. B. Activation of muscle without myogenesis by ectopic expression of MyoD in frog embryo Nature (Lond.), 347: 197-200, 1990. 36. Benezra, R., Davis, R. 1., Lockshon, H. The protein Id: a negative regulator proteins. Cell, 61: 49-59, 1990.

trans my-

1990.

30. Brennan, 1. J., chakraborty, T., and Olson, E. N. Mutagenesis of the myogenin basic region identifies an ancient protein motif critical for activation of myogenesis. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 5675-5679, 1991.

genes cells.

D., Turner, 0. L., and Weintraub, of helix-loop-helix DNA binding

37. Chakraborty, 1., Brennan, T., and Olson, E. Differential trans-activation of a muscle-specific enhancer by myogenic helix-loop-helix proteins is separable from DNA binding. J. Biol. chem., 266: 2878-2882, 1991.

1., Vale, embryocell, 63:

38. Thomsen, G., Woolf, 1., Whitman, M., Sokol, S., vaughan, W., and Melton, D. A. Activins are expressed early in Xenopus genesis and can induce axial mesoderm and anterior structures. 485-493, 1990. 39. Smith, J. C. Mesoderm induction and mesoderm-inducing early amphibian development. Development, 105: 665-677,

factors 1989.

in

40. Colman, A. Translation of eukamyotic messenger RNA in Xenopus oocytes, In: B. D. Hames and S. J. Higgins (eds.), Transcription and Translation: A Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press, 1984. 41. laevis

28. Sternberg, E. A., Spizz, G., Perry, W. M., vizard, D., Weil, T., and Olson, E. N. Identification of upstream and intragenic regulatory elements that confer cell-type-restricted and differentiation-specific expression on the muscle creatine kinase gene. Mol. cell. Biol., 8: 2896-2909, 1988. activation

expression of two EMBO J., 8: 4091 -

34. Thayer, M., Tapscott, S. J., Davis, R. 1., Wright, W. E., Lasser, A. B., and Weintraub, H. Positive autoregulation ofthe myogenic determination gene MyoDl . Cell, 58: 241 -248, 1989.

regulation. Proceedings Evolutionary

25. Braun, T., Winter, B., Bober, E., and Arnold, H. H. Transcriptional activation domain of the muscle-specific gene-regulatory protein myfs. Nature (Lond.), 346: 663-665, 1990. Edmondson, 4: 1450, 1990.

S., Taylor, M., and M#{233}chali,M. Differential proto-oncogenes during development.

c-myc

33. Thayer, M., and Weintraub, H. Activation and repression of myogenesis in somatic cell hybrids: evidence for trans-negative regulation of MyoD in primary fibroblasts. Cell, 63: 23-32, 1990.

24. Tapscott, S. I., Davis, R. 1., Thayer, M. J., cheng, P. F., Weintraub, H., and Lassar, A. B. MyoDl : a nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science (Washington DC), 242: 405-411, 1988.

26.

vriz,

4097,

Xenopus.

expression induction

629

31. Weintraub, H., Davis, R., Lockshon, D., and Lassar, A. MyoD binds cooperatively to two sites in a target enhancer sequence: occupancy of two sites is required for activation. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 56235627, 1990. Xenopus

polyplo-

& Differentiation

P. 0., and Faber, J. (eds.). Normal Ed 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland

Nieuwkoop, (Daudin),

table of Xenopus Publishing Co.,

1967.

42. Krieg, polymerase. Technology.

P. A. Synthesis In:

I. W.

London:

Dale

of RNA probe using SP6, 17 and and P. G. Sanders (eds.), Methods

JAI Press,

T3 RNA in Gene

in press.

43. Kimes, B. W., and Brandt, B. L. Characterization of two putative smooth muscle cell lines from rat thoracic aorta. Exp. Cell Res., 98: 1 15133, 1976. 44. Yaffe, D., and Saxel, 0. Serial ogenic cells isolated from dystrophic 725-727, 1977.

passaging and differentiation of mymouse muscle. Nature (Lond.), 270: