Diurnal behaviour of wintering Wigeon Anas penelope at ... - Wildfowl

1 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
Mayhew & Houston 1989; Tamisier &. Pradel; 1992; Brunckhorst & Rösner;. 1998; Mathers et al. 2000) but has received little attention in North Africa,.
51

Diurnal behaviour of wintering Wigeon Anas penel ope at Lac d e s Oiseaux, n or th eas t Algeria M . Hou hamdi & B. Samrao ui

Laboratoire de R e c h e rc h e d e s Z o n e s H u m id e s, University of A n naba , 4 rue Hassi-B e i'da, A nnaba, Algeria. Email: h o u h a m d i m o u s s a @yahoo. fr; b s a m r a o u i@ hotm ail. co m

Over a p erio d of f o u r y ears , th e d iu r n a l b e h a v io u r of W ig e o n A nas p e n e ­ lope w a s m o n i t o r e d at Lac des Oiseaux, a s h a ll o w f r e s h w a t e r lake, p a rt of th e N u m id i a n w e t l a n d c o m p le x located in n o r t h e a s t A lg e ria . W ig eo n a rr iv e a ro u n d late O c t o b e r and o v e r w in t e r f o r 5 -6 m o n t h s , w i t h n u m b e r s f l u c t u a t in g b e tw e e n 200 and 3, 000 birds. Th e y o ccu p y th e c e n t r a l area of th e lake and n o r t h w e s t e r n p a rts d o m in a te d by B u l r u s h S cirpu s la cu stris and Sea C l u b - r u s h S. m a ritim u s , f a r f r o m

any h u m a n

d is tu rb a n c e .

R e s u lts s h o w a s e a s o n a l c h a n g e in b e h a v io u r t h r o u g h o u t t h e s tu d y p e r i ­ od and h i g h l ig h t th e fa c t t h a t fe ed in g fo r m e d an i m p o r t a n t p a r t of th e b ir ds' d iu r n a l a ctivit ie s at Lac des Oiseaux, w h i c h is used bo th as a f e e d ­ ing area and a roost. T h e se r e s u l t s d if fe r f r o m data o b ta in e d in p a r t s of Europe, w h e r e fe e d in g is m a i n ly a n o c t u r n a l activity. P ossib le fa c t o rs i n f lu e n c in g th e g e o g ra p h ic v a ria tio n in th e d iu r n a l b e h a v io u r of W ig eo n are d is cusse d.

Key Words: Anatidae, dabbling ducks, wetlands, tim e budget, w in tering ecology, conser­ vation, North Africa

The eco logy of W ig eon A nas p e n e ­ lope

has been stu died

inten siv e ly in

received little a tt e n tio n in N o r th Africa, where

lo c a l

w e tla n d s

a re

under

Europe [Owen 1973; C a m p re d o n 1982;

i n c r e a s in g

Pirot et al. 1984; A llo u c h e e t al. 1989;

(Bredin e t al.

M ayhe w & H ou ston 1989; T a m i s ie r &

1992; T a m i s ie r & B o u d o u re s q u e 1994).

P ra del; 1992; B r u n c k h o r s t & R ösner;

A s tu d y of th e b e h a v io u r of Wig eon, one

1998;

of the m o s t a b u n d a n t w a t e r f o w l in the

M athers

et al.

© W ild fo w l & W e tla n d s T rust

2000)

b ut

has

a n th ro p o g e n ic 1986;

pressure

S a m ra o u i

et al.

W ildfow l (2003] 54: 51-62

52 D iu rnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon

region, is h e lp f u l in o r d e r to u n d e rs ta n d

c o n tr a s t to th e n e ig h b o u r in g M e k h a d a

th e g e o g ra p h ic v a ria tio n in the w i n t e r ­

marsh, where

ing s tr a te g ie s of d u c k s and to identify

relatively str o n g .

key e c o lo g ic a l r e q u ir e m e n t s .

W e e k ly

Several

stu d ie s have s h o w n th a t W igeon are

from

h u n tin g

p re s s u re w a s

o b se rva tio n s

O c to b e r

1996 to

w ere

made

O c to b e r 2000

q uite ad a p ta b le and are able to display

t h r o u g h a 20x60 te le s c o p e and a p a ir of

a t r e m e n d o u s p la s tic ity of b e h a v io u r to

10x50

b in o c u la rs .

In d i v id u a l

counts

m a t c h c h a n g in g e n v ir o n m e n t a l c o n d i­

w e r e c a rr ie d

t io n s w it h in a sp e cif ic habit a t (Owen &

n u m b e r of W ig eon w a s fe w e r th a n 200.

W i ll ia m s

W hen th is n u m b e r w a s exceeded, an

1976; von K änel 1981). The

out w h e n e v e r the to ta l

lack of data on loca l p o p u la tio n s has

e s tim a t e

c o n s id e r a b ly

achieved by dividing th e flo c k into s m a l l

ham pered

c o n s e rv a t io n

of th e

p o p u la tio n

size w as

eff ort s, and, by exp lo rin g the ecology of

e q u a l p a rts and t h r o u g h e xtra p o la tio n .

Wig eo n, th is p a p e r a im s to f i l l s o m e

The s p a tia l d is t rib u tio n w a s re cord ed

gaps in s c ie n tis ts ' k n o w le d g e of the use

on a m a p and the birds' t i m e bud g e t

of lo cal w e t la n d s by w a t e rf o w l.

( O c t o b e r - A p r il )

was

m on ito re d

fro m

0700h to 0930h and f r o m 12 noon to 1430h.

Methods

These

tw o

periods

were

a s s u m e d to be re p re s e n ta tiv e of a f u l l Data

were

c o ll e c t e d

at

Lac

des

Oiseaux [n o r th e a s t e r n A lgeria), a s h a l ­ low f r e s h w a t e r lake of 75ha d o m in a te d by N a r r o w - l e a f C a tta il Typha an g u stifo tia

and

B u lru s h

S c irp u s

Lacustris

(Figure 1). The s tu d y site is p a rt of the e a s te r n

N u m id i a n

w e t la n d

c o m plex,

w h ic h h old s th r e e R a m s a r sites, Lac des

Ois eaux,

Lac

Tonga

and

Lac

Oubeira, as w e l l as a vari e ty of m a r s h ­ es, dun e s l a c k s and se a s o n a l ponds. Lac Tonga and Lac OubeTra are located w ith in

th e

(Stevenson B é la ir

K ala

et at.

N atio n a l

1988;

com plex

such

as

Lac

P a rk

S a m ra o u i

1998). The w e s t e r n

w e tla n d s ite s

El

includes Fetzara

&

N u m id ia n Ramsar and

the

G u e rb e s -S e n h a d ja w e t la n d s (S am rao ui & B é la ir 1997). D urin g the stu dy period th e lake had not yet b e co m e a p r o t e c t­ ed

a re a

but

h u nting

was

rare,

in

day, a lt h o u g h

C a m p re d o n

(1981) has

s h o w n th a t W ig eo n may, at tim e s , d is ­ p la y

an

uneven

p a tte rn

of

d iu rn a l

behaviour. A r a n d o m ly s e le c te d fo ca l d u c k ( A ltm a n n 1974·) w a s fo llo w e d fo r 10 m i n u t e s and its b e h a v io u r divided a r b i t r a r il y into five activ ities: feeding, s w im m in g , p reening, s leeping and fly ­ ing.

A d d itio n a l

obse rva tio n s

were

c a rr ie d out at da w n and d u s k to record th e

d u c k 's

m ovem ents

be tw e e n

Lac

des Oiseau x and any o t h e r a d ja c e n t w e tla n d . A data

m atrix

(42 w e e k s /5

activities) w a s a s s e m b le d and analysed u sing

m u l ti v a r i a t e s t a t is t ic a l analysis

w it h th e A D E -4 p a cka g e (T hioulo use et al. 1997). To c o n f i r m

o b s e rv a tio n s

made

at

Lac des Oiseaux, in F e b ru a ry 2002 the tim e

b u d g e t of W igeon at tw o o th e r

sites, th e M e k h a d a , a s e a s o n a l b r a c k ­ ish m a r s h of 15, 000ha, and Lac Tonga,

Diurnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon 53

Figure 1. M a p s of L a c d e s Oiseaux, no rthe ast Algeria, s h o w in g the location of w in te ring W ig e o n during 1996-1999.

54- D iurnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon

a s h a ll o w f r e s h w a t e r lak e of 2,400ha

bilised f o r s e v e ra l w e e k s before g r a d u ­

was

all y

m o n ito re d

(A ltm a n n

using

scan

s a m p l in g

1974 ). A to t a l of 45 h o u rs

dw in d lin g

d e p a rt u re

in

off

w ith

m id-M arch.

the

b ir d s '

D ur ing

the

w e re devoted to th e s e l a t t e r o b s e rv a ­

s tu d y period, W ig eo n oc cu pied th e lake

tions

f o r 6-7 m o n t h s , w it h an average p o p u ­

at

e ach

si te.

H u n t in g

was

relatively fr e q u e n t t h r o u g h o u t the study

lat ion size of 500 and peaks of aro u n d

period at both sites.

3, 000 birds.

Results

s p a tia l s t r u c t u r e w it h i n th e lake, c o n ­

W ig eo n displa yed a relatively stable c e n tr a ti n g in the ce n tr e and close to of

n o r t h w e s t e r n p a rt s d o m in a te d by b u l ­

October, several w e e k s a f t e r th e firs t

rush S. la custris and scattered patches of

w in t e r in g Teal A. crecca (H o u h a m d i &

b ulrush S. maritimus·, two o th e r species,

W igeon

a r r iv e d

at

th e

end

S a m ra o u i 2 0 0 1). A t f i r s t the n u m b e r of

Eurasian Wa te r Milfoil M y riophyllum s p i­

bir ds flu c tu a te d , a p rob able ind ic atio n

c a tu m

and

Fennel

of tr a n s ie n t birds on t h e i r w ay f u r t h e r

Potamogeton pectinatus,

s o u th ,

there.

then

th e

population

size

incre ased and th e peak w a s reached

Pondweed also

abo und

M o n i to ri n g th e t i m e b u d g e t d u rin g

d u rin g J a n u a r y (Figure 2). T h e re a ft e r,

the f o u r y e a r period (1996-2000), a to t a l

the n u m b e r decre a s e d s h a rp l y and s t a ­

of 209 h ours, ind ic ated th a t fe edin g w a s

Figure 2. W eekly co u n t s of W ig e o n at L ac d e s Oiseaux, n ortheast Algeria, for four periods: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are s tan d ard errors.

D iurnal behaviour of w intering Wigeon 55

Figure 3. (a) Pe rce ntage of time allocated by W ige o n at L ac d e s Oiseaux, n o rth e ast Algeria, to diu rna activities ( ^ · sleeping;

WMås w im m in g :

feeding; 1: ::i preening and I

I flying]. Data have beer

ave ra ge d over fo ur w in tering periods, (b) Pe rce ntage of time allocated by W ig e o n to diu rnal feeding al L a c d e s O ise au x for four perio ds: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are stand ard errors. Ie] Pe rce ntage of time allocated by W ig e o n to diu rnal s w im m in g at L ac d e s O ise au x for four periods: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are stand ard errors.

56 D iu rnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon

Figure

U.(a)

Pe rce n tage of time allocated by W ig e o n to diu rn al preenin g at L a c d e s Oiseaux, northeas t

Algeria, for four periods: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are sta ndard erro rs. (b) Pe rcentage of time allocated by W ig e o n to diu rn al sle e p in g at L ac d e s O is e au x for four periods: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are sta ndard errors, [c) Perce n tage of time allocated by W ig e o n to diu rn al flying at L a c d e s O ise au x for four periods: 1996-1999. Vertical lines are stan d ard errors.

D iurnal behaviour of w intering Wigeon 57

P r e li m i n a r y

th e m a in activity (55% of t i m e spent), fo llo w e d

by s w i m m i n g

(20%), slee p ing

and

(3%) and

pre enin g

re c o rd e d

at the

(2%)

to c o n f i r m re s u lts o b ta in e d at Lac des

(Figures 3-4). In s h a rp c o n tr a s t to t h e i r

Oiseaux. At both sites, feedin g d o m i ­

c o u n te rp a rts

in the

nated o t h e r activities, w ith s w i m m i n g

C am a rg u e , W ig eo n at Lac des Oiseaux

and pree n in g being m o r e fr e q u e n t th a n

spent, overall, a n e g lig ib le p a rt of t h e i r

s lee p in g and flying (Figure 5).

th a t

flying

data

M e k h a d a m a r s h and Lac Tonga se e m

o v e rw in te r

t i m e in sleep and fed actively by day. T im e devoted to fee din g increased

The f a c t o ria l p la n e of th e fi r s t tw o axes of th e c o r r e s p o n d e n c e analysis

ste adily t h r o u g h o u t th e w in t e r in g p e r i ­

(88% of inertia) is s u ffic ie n t to reveal

od, f r o m 45% upon a r r iv a l to n e a rly 60%

th e s t r u c t u r e in th e data by o u tlin in g

p r i o r to th e re t u rn fligh t. P re enin g w as

th e

an i m p o r t a n t activity: the t i m e a llo cate d

b e h a v io u r (Figure 6a). The firs t axis

p ro g re s s iv e

seasonal change

in

to p reening, c a rr ie d out m o s t ly in the

(63% of inertia), w h i c h can be d e e m e d

m o r n in g , r e m a in e d stable th r o u g h o u t

to re p re s e n t th e 'e n e rg y axis' (Figure

th e

6b),

study

p e rio d

S w im m ing

at

aro u n d

20%.

re p re s e n te d , upo n arr ival,

shows

the

c lea r

o p p o s it io n

be tw e e n feeding (actively g ain ing e n e r ­

27% of d iu r n a l activity before fa llin g to

gy)

a ro u n d 18% f o r the rest of th e w in te r in g

e x p e n d itu re at a m i n i m u m ) w h e r e a s

period. S w i m m i n g w a s g e n e ra lly a s s o ­

t h e se co n d axis (25% of inertia) h ig h ­

ciated w it h feeding, and 85% of the

l ig h t s

b ir d s

w ere

r e c o rd e d

feeding

and

s le e p i n g

th e

(k e e p in g

m o n th ly

energy

gradient

w hile

(D e c e m b e r - A p r i l ) th a t s in g le s o u t c o m ­

s w i m m i n g w h e r e a s 15% w e r e observed

f o r t (and poss ibly c o u rts h ip ) activities

to feed on the n o r t h e r n and n o r t h w e s t ­

f r o m flying, w h ic h is m o r e p ro n o u n c e d

e rn ba n ks of the lake. T im e a ll o c a te d to

p r i o r to the W ig e o n 's d e p a rt u re f r o m

sleep displayed a p rogressive decline,

th e s tu d y site.

f r o m 10% at th e s t a r t of th e w in te r in g p eriod to 2 -3 % p r i o r to the r e t u r n of the W igeon to t h e i r bree din g g ro u n d s . This l a t t e r a ctivity w a s clea r ly con fined to th e f i r s t pa rt of th e day.

Flight, in f r e ­

q u e n tly re cord ed and w it h a peak of 4% d u rin g th e f o u r ye a r period, w as m a n i ­ fe st at th e end of the w in t e r in g period and w a s

g e n e r a l ly

p ro voked

by the

p re se n ce of c h ild re n . W igeon w e r e not easily d is tu rb e d by m a r a u d i n g Marsh H a r r i e r Circus aeruginosus and reacted only by flo c k in g in th e c e n tr e of the lake.

58 D iurnal behaviour of w inte ring Wigeon

Figure 6. Plot of factorial plane 1x2 of c o r re s p o n d e n c e an a ly s is of the diu rnal behavio ur of W ig e o n in north e ast Algeria: a] ordination of dates with the cir cles rep re se ntin g the weighted av erage of s a m p lin g w e e k s (sm a ll squ are s]; b] ordination of d iu rn al activities; c] h is to g r a m of eigenvalues.

D iurnal behaviour of w intering Wigeon 59

Discussion

devo ted

la r g e ly to

in t e n s iv e A sizable p ro p o rtio n of W igeon w i n ­ te r

re g u la rly

in

N u m id i a

[ A t k in s o n -

re c o v e ry th r o u g h

f e e d in g

and

p re e n in g .

D e c e m b e r and J a n u a r y see a s u b s t a n ­ tia l inc re a s e in th e t i m e a llo c a te d to

W ille s 19741, w h e r e up to 100, 000 have

s lee p in g

been co un te d . C ounts in re cent years

F e b ru a ry and March th e birds' activ ities

and

s w im m in g ,

have c o n fi r m e d th a t th e region is an

are d o m in a te d by sle e p in g and, once more,

f o r W igeon [I s e n m a n n & M oali 2000).

T a m i s ie r et at. 1995). A n o t h e r fe a tu re

Good

record ed

of the to t a l W igeon

(C am predon

in

i m p o r t a n t w in t e r in g and sta g in g area e s tim a t e s

f e e d in g

whereas

1982;

in the C am a rg u e , s o u th e r n

are

France, is th a t feeding g ro u n d s are d is ­

unava ila ble, but th e bir d s at Lac des

t i n c t f r o m roosts, m a k i n g up fu n c t io n a l

Oiseaux, Lac Tonga and th e Mekhada

u nits' (T a m is ie r 1985).

p o p u la tio n w in t e r in g

in

N u m id i a

m a r s h p robably a m o u n t to a sizeable

The p a tte rn of b e h a v io u r and use of

fr a c tio n of the to t a l c ou nt (Lac Fetzara

w e t la n d s ob served in N u m id ia are not

is the

f u l ly c o n s i s t e n t w i t h

only o t h e r

m ajor

site

in the

region). The

th e

C am argue

m o d e l but are s i m i l a r to th o s e r e c o r d ­ la te

a rriv a l

of

W igeon

in

ed at Lac Ic hke ul, Tunisia (Bredin et at.

N u m id ia is s i m i l a r to th a t recorded in

1986), w h ic h W igeon exp loit as both a

th e C am a rg u e , but s o m e u n c e rt a in t ie s

d iu r n a l fe eding

s u r r o u n d th e s ta tu s of W igeon th a t w i n ­

A lth o u g h

t e r in A lg e ria and Tunisia, w h i c h may

h e ig h te n e d f o r m e t h o d o lo g i c a l re a so n s

g ro u n d

th e s e

and a roost.

diffe re n ce s

may

be

d is t in c t fr o m

(scan vs fo cus m e th o d s , s a m p le size,

th a t w in t e r in g in the C a m a rg u e , w ho se

d iu r n a l and n o c t u r n a l o b s e rv a tio n s vs

belong to a pop u la tio n r e p ro d u c t iv e

grounds

are

in S iberia

(T am isie r & D e h o r t e r 1999). U nfo rtu n a te ly, the p re s e n t stu dy did not

include

fo c u s e d

o n ly

co u rtsh ip on

a c ti v it ie s

d iu rn a l

d iu r n a l data), th e p re s e n t s tu d y points t o w a r d s d is tin c t d iu r n a l use s of w e t ­

and

b e h a v io u r ;

however, W igeo n w e r e s h o w n

not to

devote a sizable p art of t h e i r d iu r n a l

l an d s by W igeon on each side of the M e d ite rr a n e a n . H ow can th e d is c r e p ­ a n c ie s

between

th e s e

patte rn s

be

a c c o u n te d for? It is w o r t h

n o tin g th a t s tu d ie s of

t i m e to c o u r t s h ip (T am isie r & D e h o r te r

t i m e b u d g e ts of W ig eo n w in t e r in g

1999). To o v ercom e the o t h e r l i m i t a ­

E urope have revealed a w id e va ri a tio n

in

tio n s of th e p re s e n t study, n o c t u r n a l

in th e circ a d ia n p a tt e rn of feeding and

data are needed to a ssess the ove ra ll

s leeping (C a m p re d o n 1982). The s p a ­

be h a v io u r of W igeon (B a ld a s s a r re et at.

t i o - t e m p o r a l d is t r ib u tio n

1988).

th e C a m a rg u e and e ls e w h e re has been

The w in t e r in g has

been

divided

phases, w it h

s tr a te g y of W igeon

in

a t t r i b u te d to a fixed life t r a it r a t h e r th a n

d is tin c t

a re c e n t a d a p ta tio n to h u n tin g d i s t u r ­

November

bance [D e h o r t e r & T a m i s ie r 1998). Two

into t h r e e

O cto ber and

obse rved

60 D iurnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon

o t h e r reasons, d is t u r b a n c e and visual

of

se le ctio n of food, have been put fo r w a rd

g la s s w o r t

Baudot

R a n u n c u lu s

b a u d o tii and

S alicornia sp.

(C a m p re d o n

to explain the g e o g ra p h ic a l dis cre pancy

1984). W igeon are also able to i n c o r p o ­

in behaviour. D is tu r b a n c e m ay indeed

rate seed s and a n im a l m a t e r i a l in t h e i r

c o n s tra in d u c k s to s eek safe ty in n u m ­

diet (C ra m p & S im m o n s 1977; D a n e ll &

bers d u rin g the day in roosts, w h e r e a s

Sjöberg 1982; Jac o b s e n 1991).

th ey m a y d is p e r s e m o r e safely and feed

The W i g e o n ’s s m a l l body size and

by n ig ht w h e n pre d a tio n and hun ting

h e rb iv o ro u s diet are c o n s tr a in t s th a t

p re s s u re s are low.

are m e t by its high food intake and r e l ­

D is tu r b a n c e by predators , in clu d in g

a tiv e ly

lon g e r

f e e d in g

h u m a n s , u n d o u b te d ly plays an i m p o r ­

(C a m p r e d o n

ta n t role in the sele ctio n

M a yhew & H ou sto n 1993). In o r d e r to

s i te s

(Owen

&

of feeding

W illia m s

1976).

In

England, fe eding is d iu r n a l in protecte d

1982;

b o u ts

Mayhew

1988;

m e e t its heavy en e rg y r e q u i r e m e n t s , th e

W igeon's

f e e d in g

p la sticity

has

are as and n o c t u r n a l in ha b it a ts e x p e ri­

evolved to a ll o w it to graze a ro u n d the

e n c in g

c lo c k (M ayhew

d if f e r e n t

inte n s itie s

of

1988) and in a gre at

d is tu rb a n c e , w h e r e a s both in England

v a ri e ty of h a b it a ts , ra n g in g f r o m f r e s h ­

and

is

w a t e r lak e s to i n t e r t id a l s a lt m a rs h e s .

in flu e n ce d by the ti m i n g of tid es (Owen

T his p a tt e rn of b e h a v io u r m a y be p a r ­

&

ti c u la r ly i m p o r t a n t at la titu d e s w h e r e

Fra nce,

Thomas

f e e d in g 1979;

in

von

m u d fla ts Kanel

1981;

C a m p re d o n 1982; M a yh ew 1988). It is

en e rg y r e q u i r e m e n t s

possible th a t the d iu r n a l d is tu rb a n c e

due to lo w e r w i n t e r t e m p e r a tu r e s . The

m a y be

h ig h e r

e n c o u n te r e d by W ig eon in N u m id ia is

t o t a l feedin g t i m e p e r day in N u m id ia

b e lo w a specif ic t h r e s h o ld . Data on th is

a p p e a rs to be m a r k e d l y s h o r t e r th an

a s p ect are needed u rg e n tly as h u m a n

t h a t found e ls e w h e re (12-16 hours), but

e n c r o a c h m e n t is e v e r-in c re a s in g and

fu rth e r

inve stig a tio n s

of

no ctu rn a l

Lac des Oiseaux m i g h t w e l l beco m e

b e h a v io u r of W igeon are needed before

u n s u ita b le f o r w in t e r in g birds.

fa c to rs u n d e rly in g s uch dif fe re n c e s can

The second c o n s tra in t, m a n ife ste d

be a d d re s s e d safely.

in the need to se le c t food visually in a

The w id e g e o g ra p h ic d if fe re n ce in

h e te r o g e n e o u s e n v ir o n m e n t, is linked

the p a tte rn of fe eding and use of w e t ­

to the W igeon 's diet, w h ic h short

grass

Mayhew

&

swards Houston

inclu d e s

(Owen 1989).

1973; In

th e

lands need not be induced by a single fa ctor, and it s e e m s likely th a t it may re fle ct the i n te ra c tio n of hydrology, p ro ­

C am a rg u e , the diet of W igeon has been

d u c tiv ity ,

fou nd

pro c e s s e s d if fic u lt to ide n tif y by o b s e r ­

to be com p o se d , to a sizable

d is t u r b a n c e

a lo n e .

Clea rly,

and more

o th e r

extent, of D itc h g r a s s Ruppia cirrhosa,

vation

d e ta ile d

D w a rf E e lg rass Zostera noltil, Fennel

s tu d ie s are ne eded to u n ra v e l th e f u l l

Pondweed, L e s s e r P ondweed P. p u s il­

ra nge of b e h a v io u r d isplay ed by W igeon

lus, E u ra sia n W a te r Milfoil, B u tte rc u p

in N o r th A fric a , and th is e ff o rt s h o u ld

D iu rnal behaviour of w intering Wigeon 61

o b s e rv a tio n

Bunckhorst, H. & Rosner, H-U. 1998. Das

s it e s t h a t h o ld l a r g e r n u m b e r s of b ir d s .

V o rko m m en von Pfeifenten Anas penelope

in c l u d e t h e

use of m o re

im

s c h l e s w ig - h o ls t e in is c h e n

W a tte n -

meer. Corax 1 7 : 81 -96.

Acknowledgements

Campredon, P. 1981. Hivernage du Canard T h e a u t h o r s a r e m o s t g r a t e f u l to Dr. A. T a m i s i e r f o r m a k i n g

h e lp fu l c o m ­

m e n t s a n d s u g g e s t i o n s w h i c h g r e a t ly im p ro v e d

a

p re v io u s

v e rsio n

of

the

m a n u s c rip t.

References

S if f le u r

en

C a m a rg u e .

France.

Statio nne m en ts et activités. Alauda 49: 169-193. Campredon, P. 1982. Dém ographie et écolo­ gie du Canard S iffle u r Anas penelope L. pe nd ant son h iv erna ge en France. Docto ral thesis, USTL, M ontp ellier; 161 PP-

Allouche, L., Dervieux, A., Lespinasse, P. &

Campredon P. 1984. Régime a lim en ta ire du

Tamisier, A. 1989. Sélection de l'habitat

Canard S iffle ur Anas penelope L. pendant

diurne pa r trois espèces d'oiseaux d'eau

son hivernage en Camargue. L'Oiseau et la

h e rb iv o re s h iv e rn a n t en C a m argu e [France). Acta Oecotogica/Oecoiogia Applicata 10: 197-212.

RFO 54: 189-200. Cramp, S. & S im m ons, K. E. L. 1977. The

Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 1. Altm an n, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: Sam pling m ethods. Behaviour 49: 227-267.

University Press, Oxford. Danell, K. & Sjöberg, K. 1982. Seasonal and diel changes in the feeding behaviour of

A tkin so n-W illes,

G. 1974. The nu m e ric a l

distributio n of ducks, swans and coots as a guide in assessing the im p o rta n c e of w e tlan ds in midwinter. In: Proceedings of

the International Conference on Wetlands and Waterfowl, Peiligenhafen 1974, (ed. M. Smart). Intern atio n al W aterfow l Research Bureau, Slim brid ge; pp. 199-254.

ry:

te c h n iq u e s

for

w a te r fo w l.

t im in g In:

ing

la ke

in

n o r th e r n

Sweden.

Ornis

Scandinavica 13: 129-134. Dehorter, 0. & Tamisier, A. 1998. Hunting v u l n e ra b ilit y and w i n t e r in g s tra te g y am ong w a te rfo w l in Camargue, France.

Wildlife Biology 4: 13-21.

Baldassarre, G.A., Paulus, S. L., Tamisier, A. & Titman, R. D. 1988. W orkshop s u m m a ­ w i n t e r in g

som e dabbling duck species on a breed­

activ ity

of

Waterfowl in

H o u h a m d i, M. & S a m ra o u i, B. 2001. Occupation s p a tio -te m p o re lle du Lac des Oiseaux, N o rd-est algérien par l'avifaune aquatique. Alauda 70: 301-310.

Winter, (ed. M. W. Weller). University of Minnesota Press, Min neapolis; pp. 181188.

P. & Moali, A. 2000. Oiseaux dAlgérie. Société d'Etudes Ornithologiques

Isenmann,

de France. Bredin, D., Skinner, J. & Tamisier, A. 1986. D istributio n s p a tio -te m p o re lle et activités

Jacobsen, O.W. 1991. Feeding behaviour of

des Anatidés et foulq ues s u r l'lchkeul,

breeding Wigeon Anas penelope in rela­

grand

tio n

q u a rtie r d'hiver tunis ie n.

Etude

pré lim inaire. Acta Oecologica/Oecologica Generalis 7: 55-73.

to

seasonal

s w a r m in g b e h a vio u r Ardea 79: 409-418.

em ergence of

and

c h ir o n o m id s .

62 D iurnal behaviour of w in te ring Wigeon

R. &

Samraoui, B., de Bélair, G. & Benyacoub, S.

Montgomery, W. I. 2000. A study of the im pact of human distu rbance on Wigeon

1992. A m uch threatened lake: Lac des Oiseaux in n o rth e a s te r n Alg eria .

Anas penelope and Brent Geese Branta

Environmental Conservation 19: 264-267,

bernicla

276.

M athers,

R. G., Watson,

hrota

on

S., Stone,

an

Irish

sea

loch.

Wildfowl 51: 67- 81. Mayhew, P.W. 1988. The daily energy intake of

European W ig eon

in winter. Ornis

P.W.

Feeding site

&

Houston ,

D.

C. 1989.

selection by Wigeon

Anas

penelope in relation to water. Ibis 131: 1-8. Mayhew, P.W. & Houston, D. C. 1993. Food th r o u g h p u t tim e

rons, Algeria. An ecological evaluation. Environmental Conservation 15: 335-348.

Scandinavica 19: 217-223. Mayhew,

Stevenson, A . C., Skinner, J. & Smart, M. 1988. The El Kala National Park and envi­

in European Wigeon

Tamisier, A. 1985. Some consid eratio ns on the social re q uire m en ts of du cks in w i n ­ ter. Wildfowl 36: 104-108. Tamisier, A.

&

B oudouresque,

C.

1994.

Aquatic bird po pulatio ns as possible in di­

Anas penelope and oth er grazing w a t e r ­

ca to rs

fowl. Wildfowl 44: 174-177.

Ic h k e u l Lake, Tunisia. 279/280: 149-156.

of

se a s o n a l

n u t rie n t

flo w

at

Hydrobiologia

Owen, M. 1973. The w in t e r feeding ecology of Wigeon at B rid g e w a te r Bay, Somerset. Ibis 115: 227-243. Owen, M. & Thomas, G.J. 1979. The feeding

Tamisier, A. & D e ho rte r 0. 1999. Camargue, canards et foulques. Fonctionnement et devenir d'un prestigieux quartier d'hiver. Centre O rnithologique du Gard, Nîmes.

ecology and conservation of Wigeon w i n ­ terin g the Ouse Washes, England. Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 795-809.

Tamisier, A. & Pradel, R. 1992. Analyse s ta ­ tistiq ue de l'habitat hivernal diu rne du Canard

Owen, M. & W illia m s, G. 1976. W in te r d is tr i­ bu tio n

and

h a b ita t

r e q u ir e m e n ts

of

S if f le u r Anas penelope

C a m argu e.

Persp ectiv e s

de

L.

en

gestion.

Revue d'Ecologie Terre et Vie 47: 135-150.

Wigeon in Britain. Wildfowl 27: 83-90. T am is ier, A., A llo u c h e , Pi rot, J-Y., Chessel, D. & Tamisier, A. 1984. Exploita tion

a l im e n ta ir e

des

zones

hum id e s de Cam argue par 5 espèces de canards de surface en hivernage et en

L., Aubry,

F. &

Dehorter, 0. 1995. W intering strategies and breeding success: hypothesis for a tra d e off in som e w a te r fo w l species. Wildfowl 46: 76-88.

transit: m odélisatio n spatio -tem p orelle . Revue d'Ecologie Terre et Vie 39: 169-192.

Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Dolédec, S. & Olivier, J . M. 1997. ADE-4: a m ultivaria te

Samraoui, B. & de Bélair, G. 1997. The Guerbes-Senhadja wetlands. Part I: an

analysis and graphic al display software. Statistics and Computing 7: 75-83.

overview. Ecologie 28: 233-250. Samraoui, B. & de Bélair, G. 1998. Les zones hu m id es de la N um id ie orientale: bilan des conna issan ces et perspectives de gestion. Synthèse 4: 1-90.

von Känel, A. 1981. W in te r feeding ecology of Wigeon Anas penelope at the Ouse Washes, England. Ibis 123: 438-449.