The Caspase-8 Homolog Dredd Cleaves Imd and ...

THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 289, NO. 29, pp. 20092–20101, July 18, 2014 © 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A.

The Caspase-8 Homolog Dredd Cleaves Imd and Relish but Is Not Inhibited by p35*□ S

Received for publication, December 19, 2013, and in revised form, May 16, 2014 Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 2, 2014, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M113.544841

Chan-Hee Kim1,2, Donggi Paik1, Florentina Rus, and Neal Silverman3 From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 Background: During the Drosophila immune response, both Imd and Relish are cleaved in a manner dependent on the caspase-8 homolog Dredd. Results: Dredd cleaves Imd and Relish, but not the caspase inhibitor p35, without interdomain autoprocessing. Conclusion: Imd and Relish are direct substrates for full-length Dredd. Significance: Dredd is similar to some mammalian initiator caspases, which can function without interdomain cleavage.

The Imd pathway is one of two NF-␬B signaling pathways controlling antimicrobial peptide (AMP)4 induction in the Drosophila immune response. Diaminopimelic acid-type peptidoglycan (PGN), from Gram-negative and some Gram-positive bacteria, stimulates the Imd pathway through receptors PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE, and leads to the activation of Relish, a NF-␬B precursor protein similar to mammalian p100 and p105. Unlike p100 or p105

* This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant AI60025 (to N. S.) and by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Grants NRF-357-2007-1C00085 (to C. K.) and NRF-352-2009-1-C00105 (to D. P.). □ S This article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S4. 1 Both authors contributed equally to this work. 2 Present address: Global Research Laboratory of Insect Symbiosis, College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, 2 Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 609-735, South Korea. 3 To whom correspondence should be addressed: 364 Plantation St., Worcester, MA 01605. Tel.: 508-856-5826; Fax: 508-856-8447; E-mail: [email protected]. 4 The abbreviations used are: AMP, antimicrobial peptide; PGN, peptidoglycan; Ac, acetyl; AMC, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; Z, benzyloxycarbonyl; fmk, fluoromethyl ketone.

20092 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

processing, Relish is activated by endoproteolytic cleavage, and then translocates to the nucleus where it drives robust (100-fold or more) AMP gene expression (recently reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). In this pathway, the Imd protein plays a central role as receptor proximal adapter (3). Imd interacts directly with both PGRP-LC or -LE receptors (4), as well as with the Drosophila FADD homolog, which in turn recruits the caspase-8-like Dredd (5, 6). Upon PGN stimulation, Imd is endoproteolytic cleaved, at aspartate residue 30 within a caspase recognition site. Genetic studies demonstrated that this signal-induced cleavage is dependent on Fadd and Dredd. Once cleaved, Imd exposes a new N terminus that contains inhibitor of apoptosis binding motif. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Iap2 associates with cleaved Imd through the newly exposed inhibitor of apoptosis binding motif, and rapidly conjugates Imd with K63-linked polyubiquitin. K63 polyubiquitin chains are suggested to function as a scaffold to activate Tak1 and IKK kinases (Ird5 and Kenny), which are critical for Relish activation and AMP gene induction (7). In the absence of immune stimulation, Relish is found in the cytoplasm in its full-length form, but upon immune stimulation, Relish is cleaved at aspartate 545 within a preferred caspase target site. Subsequently, the N-terminal fragment containing the Rel-homology domain translocates to the nucleus to act as a transactivator. Again, genetic data show that this cleavage requires Dredd and Fadd (8 –10). Caspases, including Dredd are cysteine proteases that play crucial roles in apoptosis and inflammation. Mammalian caspases can be sorted into two subgroups based on their functions. Apoptotic caspases integrate intrinsic and extrinsic signals and execute apoptosis, whereas inflammatory caspases cleave pro-inflammatory cytokines, processing them into their mature forms (reviewed in Refs. 11 and 12). The Drosophila genome is known to encode seven caspases. Three of them, Nedd2-like caspase (Nc)/Dronc, Dredd, and Dream/Strica have long prodomains typical of apical or initiator caspases. Four others (Ice, Dcp1, Damn, and Decay) have short prodomains, characteristic of executioner caspases (13). Nc, the fly homolog of mammalian caspase-9, is an initiator caspase with a single caspase-recruitment domain that is responsible for most cell death along with the executioner caspases, Ice VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29 • JULY 18, 2014

Downloaded from http://www.jbc.org/ by guest on January 20, 2016

In Drosophila, the Imd pathway is activated by diaminopimelic acid-type peptidoglycan and triggers the humoral innate immune response, including the robust induction of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. Imd and Relish, two essential components of this pathway, are both endoproteolytically cleaved upon immune stimulation. Genetic analyses have shown that these cleavage events are dependent on the caspase-8 like Dredd, suggesting that Imd and Relish are direct substrates of Dredd. Among the seven Drosophila caspases, we find that Dredd uniquely promotes Imd and Relish processing, and purified recombinant Dredd cleaves Imd and Relish in vitro. In addition, interdomain cleavage of Dredd is not required for Imd or Relish processing and is not observed during immune stimulation. Baculovirus p35, a suicide substrate of executioner caspases, is not cleaved by purified Dredd in vitro. Consistent with this biochemistry but contrary to earlier reports, p35 does not interfere with Imd signaling in S2* cells or in vivo.

Imd and Relish Are Dredd Substrates

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Cell Culture—Drosophila S2* cells were maintained in Schneider’s Drosophila media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Valley Biomedical), 1% GlutaMAX (Invitrogen), and 0.2% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 27 °C. D.mel-2 cells were maintained in serum-free SFX-insect cell culture media (HyClone) supplemented with 20 mM glutamine and 0.2% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 27 °C with shaking after adaptation to serum-free conditions. Plasmids—cDNA of the Dredd-␦* isoform was obtained from John Abrams and used throughout this study (17, 18). Full-length ORFs of Dredd, six other Drosophila caspases, imd, Relish, and p35 were amplified by PCR using primers harboring indicated epitope tag sequences and cloned into pMT/V5-His vector (Invitrogen) or pRmHa-3 vector (19). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to introduce point mutations or insertion using a QuikChange II Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). Transfection—Drosophila S2* cells and D.mel-2 cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method as described previously (20). For experiments in Figs. 3 and 5C, cells were transiently transfected. For all other experiments, stable cell lines were established with either hygromycin (24 units/ml) or G418 (800 ␮g/ml) selection. PGN Stimulation—For PGN stimulation, cells were plated at a density of 0.5 ⫻ 106 cells/ml and grown for 16 h, and then treated with 1 mM 20-hydroxyecdysone (Sigma) for an additional 24 h. Expression of V5-tagged Dredd was then induced with 5 (Fig. 4) or 500 ␮M (Fig. 5, A and B) copper sulfate for 4 h. Cells were stimulated with 1 ␮g/ml of PGN extracted from Escherichia coli strain 1106 (ATCC 35581). JULY 18, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation—Following stimulation with PGN or induction with CuSO4, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM sodium chloride, 25 mM ␤-glycerolphosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1⫻ protease inhibitor mixture). For whole cell lysate analysis, 50 ␮g of total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Imd (7) or anti-Rel-C (8) antibodies. Images were captured using LAS4000 imager following ECL detection and quantified with ImageJ. For Fig. 1B, the percent of Relish cleavage was calculated based on the fraction of cleaved product relative to the density of total (cleaved and full-length) Relish in each lane. For detection of caspases, 200 –500 ␮g of total protein extract was used for immunoprecipitation with anti-V5 antibody (Sigma) or anti-T7 antibody (Millipore) and subjected to immunoblotting. Purification of Recombinant Proteins—Stably transfected S2* cells expressing FLAG-DreddWT-V5, FLAG-DreddCA-V5, FLAG-RelishWT, and FLAG-RelishD545A were plated at a density 0.5 ⫻ 106 cells/ml and incubated for 20 h. Cells were treated with 500 ␮M copper sulfate to induce expression of recombinant proteins for 4 h. Cells were harvested, washed with 1⫻ PBS, and kept at ⫺80 °C. Cells were lysed in 50 ml of lysis buffer without glycerol per 1 liter of culture and centrifuged at 20,000 ⫻ g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and loaded onto 0.5 ml of anti-FLAG-agarose affinity media (Tricorn 5/20; GE Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer without glycerol and protease inhibitor mixture at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. Unbound materials were washed with 100 ml of washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 500 mM sodium chloride 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT) at 0.5 ml/min. After washing, bound materials were eluted with 5 ml of 3⫻ FLAG-peptide (100 ␮g/ml; Sigma) at 0.1 ml/min. 5 ml of eluted proteins from an anti-FLAG affinity column was concentrated to 500 ␮l using a centrifugal filter with a 10-kDa cut-off (Centricon; Millipore), added to 100 ␮l of 100% glycerol and then analyzed by Coomassie Blue staining after separation by SDS-PAGE. For His-ImdWT-T7 and His-ImdD545A-T7, 500 ml of SFX insect medium supplemented with 20 mM glutamine was inoculated with 30.0 ⫻ 106 of stably transfected D.mel-2 cells. 20 h later, cells were treated with 500 ␮M copper sulfate for 4 h for induction. Cells were harvested, washed with 1⫻ PBS, and lysed in 200 ml of lysis buffer without glycerol per 500 ml of culture and centrifuged at 20,000 ⫻ g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and loaded onto 1 ml of a immobilized nickel affinity column (HisTrap; GE Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer without glycerol and protease inhibitor mixture at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Unbound materials were washed with 400 ml of washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 500 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM imidazole) at 2 ml/min. After washing, bound materials were eluted with 20 ml of washing buffer containing 250 mM imidazole at 1 ml/min. 20 ml of eluted proteins from the nickel affinity column was dialyzed with lysis buffer without glycerol, and concentrated to 800 ␮l using a centrifugal filter with 10-kDa cut-off (Centricon; Millipore), added to 200 ␮l of 100% glycerol, and analyzed by Coomassie Blue staining after separating by SDS-PAGE. To monitor autoprocessing of Dredd after caspase assay with fluorogenic peptide substrates, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

20093


and Dcp1 (reviewed in Ref. 14). Dream/Strica has a novel serine/theronine-rich prodomain, and plays redundant roles with Nc in certain apoptotic contexts (15, 16). Dredd includes a prodomain with two Death effector domains and is similar to mammalian caspase-8 (17, 18). As outlined above, Dredd is an essential component of the Imd signaling pathway. In Dredd mutant animals or Dredd knockdown cells, neither Imd nor Relish are cleaved and AMP genes are not induced. Moreover, forced expression of Dredd in S2 cells causes cleavage of Imd and Relish even in the absence of immune stimulation, and immunoprecipitated Dredd was able to cleave Relish in vitro (7, 10). Altogether, these results suggest that both Imd and Relish are direct substrates for Dredd-mediated cleavage. In this report, we aim to verify that Imd and Relish are direct Dredd substrates and provide further insights on the mechanisms of Dredd activity. We show that Dredd is the only caspase that can trigger Imd and Relish cleavage, and that partially purified recombinant Dredd can cleave Imd and Relish in vitro. Moreover, Dredd activity does not require interdomain cleavage and this autoprocessing is not observed during immune activation. Additionally, we show that baculovirus p35, a potent suicide inhibitor of some caspases, does not inhibit Dredd activity and does not block the Imd signal transduction pathway, contrary to previous reports.


***

FIGURE 1. Dredd is uniquely able to process Imd and Relish. A, Dredd, both wild type and catalytically inactive, as well as six other Drosophila caspases were expressed with C-terminal V5-epitope tags from the copper-inducible metallothionein promoter, in stably transfected S2* cells. Whole cell lysates were analyzed for caspase expression by immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by immunoblotting (IB) with V5-antibody (top panels). All caspases were expressed, although Dream expression was notably weaker than the others. Cleavage of endogenous Imd (middle panels) or Relish (bottom panels) was analyzed in the same lysates by immunoblotting. Only wild type Dredd caused the proteolytic cleavage of Imd and Relish proteins. Lysates from parental S2* cells, before and after PGN immune stimulation, were similarly analyzed as controls (left most panels). Black arrowhead, full-length Imd or Relish; white arrowhead, cleaved forms of Imd or Relish. Note, the untreated cells show weak but detectable levels of spontaneous Relish cleavage, which is further enhanced by PGN stimulation or Dredd expression. Data shown in A are typical of at least 4 independent assays, whereas B displays a quantification of Relish cleavage in these 4 independent assays; t tests show that Relish cleavage is significantly enhanced only in parental S2* cells treated with PGN or in cells over expressing wild type Dredd. *, p ⬍ 0.05; ***, p ⬍ 0.001; error bars, mean ⫾ S.E.

reaction mixtures were TCA precipitated with 10 ␮g of BSA carrier and analyzed by immunoblotting. Caspase Assays Using Purified Recombinant Dredd—Caspase assays were performed as previously described with modifications (21). 200 ng of wild type and catalytically inactive Dredd were assayed in 100 ␮l of caspase assay buffer (100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10% sucrose, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% CHAPS, 10 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF) or sodium citrate buffer (0 to 1.4 M sodium citrate, pH 7.4, 10 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF) at 30 °C for 2– 4 h using 10 ␮M fluorogenic peptide substrates, Ac-IETD-AMC (caspase-8 substrate), Ac-LEHD-AMC (caspase-9 substrate), and AcYVAD-AMC (caspase-1 substrate). For in vitro cleavage assay of Imd and Relish, 50 ng of ImdWT and ImdD30A or RelishWT and RelishD545A were incubated with 100 ng of wild type and catalytically inactive Dredd in 20 ␮l of caspase assay buffer at 30°C for 2 h. The reaction mixtures were directly analyzed by immunoblotting to monitor cleavage of Imd and Relish.


RNA Analysis—Total RNA was extracted and analyzed by Northern blotting or real-time RT-PCR as previously described (20). Fly Stocks—Yp1-Gal4 (3), GMR-rpr (22), and UAS-p35 (23) were previously described. Yp1-Gal4/⫹ and UAS-p35/⫹ flies were generated by crossing homozygous transgenic lines to w1118, whereas the Yp1-Gal4/UAS-p35 animals were generated with a cross between these same lines.

RESULTS Dredd Is Unique Among Drosophila Caspases in Processing Both Imd and Relish—Previously, we showed that over-expression of Dredd in S2* cells was sufficient to drive cleavage of both Imd and Relish in the absence of immune stimulation (7, 10). To more fully characterize the caspases potentially involved in these immune signaling events, we established and analyzed stable cell lines over-expressing each of the seven Drosophila caspases, using the copper-inducible metallothionein promoter. The proteases examined included three apical caspases, VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29 • JULY 18, 2014


*


Dredd, Nc, and Dream, and four effector caspases, Ice, Dcp1, Damm, and Decay, as well as a catalytically inactivate variant of Dredd. Of the caspases assayed, only wild type Dredd promoted the cleavage of Relish or Imd (Fig. 1). The degree of Imd cleavage observed in the cell line expressing wild type Dredd was similar (or higher) to that detected in the parental S2* cells stimulated with peptidoglycan. On the other hand, the degree of Relish cleavage, caused by Dredd over-expression, was lower but still robust and reproducible. Of note, Decay expressing cells displayed an atypical Relish processing event, even without copper induction, suggesting a possible Decay cleavage site in Relish. However, this cleavage has no known link to Imd pathway activation. Overall, these data suggest that only Dredd, among the 7 Drosophila caspases, is involved in Imd and Relish cleavage. Purified Recombinant Dredd Cleaves Imd and Relish Proteins in Vitro—To test whether Imd and Relish are substrates for Dredd, we purified recombinant wild type and catalytically inactive FLAG-Dredd-V5 from stably transfected S2* cells, using anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel capture and FLAG peptide elution. The resulting Dredd preparations were partially pure, with a major full-length Dredd band, around 52 kDa, at least two Dredd cleavage products, and 3 to 6 copurifying bands visible by Coomassie Blue staining (supplemental Fig. S1). A small fraction of wild type Dredd underwent spontaneous autoJULY 18, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29

processing to generate several fragments, which are not observed with the catalytically inactive Dredd (supplemental Figs. S1 and S2). These Dredd preparations were next used to monitor proteolytic activity with fluorogenic peptide substrates. Using the fluorogenic “caspase-8” substrate Ac-IETD-AMC, along with increasing concentrations of the kosmotropic salt sodium citrate, wild type but not the catalytically inactive Dredd exhibited strong activity. This activity was dependent on sodium citrate, reaching maximal levels with 1.2 M sodium citrate, suggesting that Dredd requires multimerization for full activity (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, the presence of kosmotropic salt appeared to inhibit autoprocessing; that is, less autoprocessed Dredd fragments were detected in reactions with the highest sodium citrate concentrations (Fig. 2B, white arrowheads). Supplemental Fig. S2 shows that the production of these Dredd fragments required catalytically active Dredd, arguing that they are all autocleavage products. Dredd also cleaved the “caspase-9” substrate Ac-LEHD-AMC, with similar activity, but showed little activity for the “caspase-1” substrate Ac-YVAD-AMC (Fig. 2C). Caspase inhibitors such as Z-VAD-fmk, Ac-IETD-fmk, and AcLEHD-fmk were all capable of inhibiting Dredd in a dose-dependent manner, using the Ac-IETD-AMC assay, although Ac-IETDfmk was most potent at concentrations below 5 ␮M (Fig. 2D). JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

20095


FIGURE 2. Affinity-purified Dredd cleaves Imd and Relish in vitro. A, recombinant Dredd proteins (FLAG-DreddWT-V5 and FLAG-DreddCA-V5) were purified by anti-FLAG affinity chromatography, and assayed with fluorogenic Ac-IETD-AMC substrate in reactions with increasing concentrations of sodium citrate. The IETD hydrolase activity of wild type Dredd reached maximal levels in 1.2 M sodium citrate buffer, whereas catalytically inactive Dredd showed no activity in any condition. B, reaction mixtures after the cleavage assay in A were precipitated with TCA and subjected to immunoblotting (IB) to confirm equal loading of recombinant protein. Only wild type Dredd is shown here, but see supplemental Fig. S2 for the catalytically inactive Dredd immunoblot (IB). Maximal Ac-IETD-AMC cleavage activity correlates with reduced autoprocessing activity. Black arrowhead, full-length Dredd; white arrowheads, p30-related forms of Dredd; asterisk, possible p10-like fragment. C, Dredd cleaved Ac-IETD-AMC caspase-8 and Ac-LEHD-AMC caspase-9 substrates but not Ac-YVAD-AMC caspase-1 substrate. D, Dredd activity, as assayed with the Ac-IETD-AMC substrate, was potently inhibited by caspase inhibitors, Z-VAD-fmk, Ac-IETD-fmk, and Ac-LEHDfmk. E, in vitro cleavage reactions with DreddWT or DreddCA and purified Imd (top panel) or Relish (bottom panel) assayed by immunoblotting. Wild type Dredd, but not the catalytically inactive protein, cleaved both Imd and Relish but not mutants with altered cleavage sites, ImdD30A and RelishD454A. Black arrowhead, full-length Imd or Relish; white arrowhead, cleaved forms of Imd or Relish. Results shown are representative of at least three sets of assays performed with at least two different preparations of purified Dredd.


To generate protein substrates, His-tagged Imd and FLAGtagged Relish were similarly expressed in stably transfected D.mel2 or S2* cells and purified by nickel capture and imidazole elution or anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel and FLAG-peptide elution, respectively. These proteins were incubated with wild type or catalytically inactive recombinant Dredd in caspase assay buffer, and assayed by immunoblotting. Wild type Dredd cleaved recombinant Imd and Relish proteins in vitro, whereas catalytically inactive Dredd did not. Moreover, this cleavage occurred at the established cleavage site for each substrate, as the uncleavable mutants of Imd (D30A) and Relish (D545A) were not processed by Dredd in vitro (Fig. 2E). Together, these data show that Imd and Relish are both direct substrates for Dredd. Autoprocessing of Dredd—In the experiments above, we observed a few processing intermediates from wild type Dredd. A fragment just above the 31-kDa standard, which we named p30, was most prominent in Coomassie staining and V5-immunoblotting after purification (supplemental Fig. S1). A similar fragment was also observed in extracts from stably transfected cells and the appearance of this fragment also required Dredd activity (Figs. 1 and 3). Based on its size, we hypothesize that this fragment arises from a cleavage between the prodomain and catalytic domains (see Fig. 3A). To identify possible processing sites in Dredd, two aspartate residues in the linker region between the prodomain and catalytic domain were changed to alanine (D2A), but this mutant was still processed to p30 (although the migration of this p30 band is slightly altered)


and was still able to cleave Imd and Relish when over-expressed (Fig. 3B, note the dotted line for comparison). This suggests that processing to generate p30 either does not occur at either of these two aspartate residues (260 and 271) or can occur at a nearby alternative sites when these two aspartates are mutated. We similarly analyzed the role of inter-domain cleavage, which would separate the putative large and small catalytic subunits of Dredd (Fig. 3A). In immunoblotting either the cell-based overexpression assays or the in vitro cleavage reaction, the small subunit (p10) was almost never detected (Figs. 1 and 2B). In the bottom of Fig. 2B, a very faint signal for a possible p10-like product can be observed, but only in the 0.2 M sodium citrate reaction, where the peptide substrate were not cleaved (marked by an asterisk). Thus, the detection of p10 does not correlate with active Dredd. To examine interdomain cleavage further, three aspartate residues in the region separating the putative large and small subunits were substituted with alanine (D3A). This mutant, as well as the D5A mutant lacking all five candidate processing site aspartates, showed greatly reduced Imd or Relish cleavage (Fig. 3B). Single aspartate to alanine mutants were analyzed to deconvolute the D3A mutant, and only the D436A mutant failed to cleave Imd and Relish (Fig. 3C), suggesting that processing at this site may be required for Dredd function. However, the Asp 3 Ala substitution is a dramatic change that may effect overall protein structure, so a more conservative D436N substitution was similarly tested. Surprisingly, D436N subVOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29 • JULY 18, 2014


FIGURE 3. Uncleavable Dredd mutants still support Imd and Relish cleavage. A, schematic representation of the Dredd and the mutant constructs analyzed here. Candidate sites (aspartate residues) for autoproteolysis, based on the homology between Drosophila Dredd and human caspase-8, were mutated to alanine or asparagine. B–D, different mutants of Dredd were expressed from the copper-inducible metallothionein promoter in stably transfected S2* cells, and Dredd autoprocessing (top) as well as, Imd (middle), and Relish cleavage (lower) were monitored by immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (IB) for Dredd-V5, or straight immunoblotting for Imd and Relish. The putative small subunit, p10, was never detected in these assays. Dotted line in panel B contrasts different mobilities of p30 fragments between D2A and wild type Dredd. Black arrowhead, full-length Dredd, Imd, or Relish; white arrowhead, cleaved forms of Dredd, Imd, or Relish. Results shown are representative of at least three independent assays.


JULY 18, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29

FIGURE 4. Processing of Dredd is not detectable during activation of the Imd signaling pathway. FLAG-DreddWT-V5 and FLAG-DreddCA-V5 were expressed from the metallothionein promoter at a low but detectable level, with 5 ␮M copper sulfate for 4 h, and then the cells were stimulated with PGN for various times, as indicated. Dredd processing, as monitored by anti-V5 immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (IB), was not particularly robust nor PGN induced. On the other hand, Imd and Relish cleavage products, indicative of Dredd-mediated cleavage and immune activation, were readily detectable following PGN stimulation (lower panels). Note that the catalytically inactive Dredd functions as a dominant-negative, even when expressed at these modest levels, interfering with both Imd and Relish cleavage. Black arrowhead, full-length Dredd, Imd, or Relish; white arrowhead, cleaved forms of Dredd, Imd, or Relish. Data shown are representative of at least three independent assays.

were even found in the same immunoprecipitated complex with p35 in immunoprecipitation-immunoblot experiments (supplemental Fig. S4B). Of note, Damm but not Decay, which are two other effector caspases from Drosophila, cleaved p35 but to a lesser extent (Fig. 5C). In vitro caspase assays showed that recombinant Dredd did not cleave purified p35, whereas commercial human Caspase-3 readily cleaved p35 (Fig. 5D). These data strongly argue that p35 is not a substrate for Dredd in vitro and, accordingly, it does not inhibit cleavage of Imd or Relish in cells. Based on these in vitro results, we next re-examined the effects of p35 on Imd signaling in adult animals. We ectopically expressed p35 in the fat bodies of adult female flies using a UAS-p35 transgene and the Yp1-Gal4 driver. Importantly, this assay included three controls genotypes: w1118 is the genetic background for these strains; the UAS-p35 transgene crossed into the w1118 background; and Yp1-Gal4 crossed into the w1118 background. These last two control genotypes were omitted from earlier studies (3, 26). These four genotypes were left unmanipulated, or were injected with either sterile PBS or live E. coli, to maximally stimulate the Imd pathway. Six hours later, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

20097


stitution still autoprocessed and cleaved both Imd and Relish similar to wild type (Fig. 3D). We also substituted the interdomain region with the tobacco etch virus protease recognition site and cotransfected this version of Dredd with increasing concentrations of a tobacco etch virus protease expressing plasmid (supplemental Fig. S3). Although this construct generated a clearly detectable p10 fragment in a tobacco etch virus-dependent manner, it did not drive the cleavage of Imd or Relish. These results suggest that interdomain cleavage of Dredd, separating the large and small subunits, is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause its activation and cleavage of downstream targets. To monitor the processing of Dredd in a more immunologically relevant situation, we induced Dredd expression at a moderate level with low copper sulfate (5 ␮M) in stably transfected S2* cells. This level of Dredd expression did not trigger the cleavage of Imd or Relish. These cells were then stimulated with 1 ␮g/ml of PGN and lysates were prepared at various time points up to 30 min poststimulation. The full-length and putative cleavage products of Dredd were immunoprecipitated with the C-terminal V5 tag and then immunoblotted. Although robust immune activation and signaling was observed, as monitored by the PGN-induced cleavage of both Imd and Relish, no processing of Dredd was observed; the full-length protein remained intact for the duration of the experiment and the protein banding pattern was indistinguishable from catalytically inactive Dredd (Fig. 4). All together, these results suggest that interdomain cleavage of Dredd, both to remove the prodomain and/or to separate the large and small subunits, is not involved in the immune activation of Dredd nor a critical part of the Imd signaling cascade. Baculovirus p35 Does Not Inhibit Dredd-mediated Cleavage of Imd and Relish—Baculovirus p35 is a highly specific inhibitor of caspases that prevents apoptotic cell death in mammalian and Drosophila cells (23, 24). p35 itself is a substrate of caspases and remains covalently bound to the catalytic cysteine to inhibit activity (25). Two previous reports have concluded that p35 inhibits Imd signaling, presumably by inhibiting Dredd (3, 26). However, other reports have claimed that p35 specifically inhibits effector caspases, like Ice, but not apical caspases like Nc (27, 28). The inhibitory activity of p35 on Dredd has not been carefully examined. To address this apparent contradiction, we first expressed p35 from the copper-inducible metallothionein promoter in stably transfected S2* cells. These cells were stimulated with 1 ␮g/ml of PGN for 10 min, and whole cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by immunoblotting for Imd and Relish cleavage (Fig. 5A and supplemental Fig. S4A). Surprisingly, expression of p35 did not affect the immune-induced cleavage of Imd or Relish. Also, the PGN-induced expression of Diptericin, Attacin A, and Cecropin A1 was unaffected by p35 in these cell lines (Fig. 5B). As p35 is cleaved by the caspases it targets, we next determined which of the seven Drosophila caspases are capable of this processing. For this assay, p35 and each of the Drosophila caspases were transiently transfected into S2* cells. As expected, p35 was efficiently processed in Dcp1 and Ice overexpressing cells, but no cleavage product was observed in the Dredd overexpressing cells (Fig. 5C, top panel). Dcp1 and Ice


RNA was isolated and the induction of Diptericin was quantified by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. In comparison to the w1118 strain, it is immediately clear that the amplitude of Diptericin gene expression is dramatically muted in the Yp1-Gal4 strain, although the fold-induction remains comparable (309fold in w1118 versus 176-fold in Yp1-Gal4). Thus, it is critical to compare the Yp1-Gal4/UAS-p35 animals to this driver-alone control; in this comparison, it is clear that p35 expression has no negative effect on Diptericin induction. In fact, the levels are increased over the control Yp1-Gal4 strain (474-fold increase in E. coli infected flies compared in uninfected flies). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis, in the lower panel of Fig. 6A, showed that p35 is expressed, as expected, in the Yp1-Gal4/UAS-p35 animals. To ensure that the UAS-p35 transgene functions prop-


erly, i.e. that is capable of inhibiting caspase-mediated cell death (22), the same UAS-p35 transgene was expressed in the developing eye imaginal discs with the GMR-Gal4 driver along with the apoptotic inducer reaper (rpr) (Fig. 6B). Expression of p35 efficiently suppressed the reaper-induced small and rough eye phenotype, as previously reported (22). Taken together, these results demonstrate that p35 is not an inhibitor of Dredd and does not interfere with immune signaling and AMP gene expression through the Imd pathway.

DISCUSSION In this study, we have focused on two key steps in the Drosophila Imd signaling pathway. Previous work has shown that both Imd and Relish are cleaved in a caspase-dependent VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29 • JULY 18, 2014


FIGURE 5. Baculovirus p35 protein does not inhibit Dredd-mediated cleavage of Imd and Relish proteins. A, stably transfected S2* cells expressing p35 protein from the metallothionein promoter were stimulated with PGN for 10 min. Expression of p35-T7 was confirmed by immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (IB) with anti-T7 antibody (top). See supplemental Fig. S4A for straight immunoblotting with anti-T7 antibody. Lysates were also assayed for Imd (middle panel) and Relish (bottom panel) cleavage by immunoblotting. p35 expression had no affect on Imd or Relish cleavage. Black arrowhead, full-length p35, Imd, or Relish; white arrowhead, cleaved forms of p35, Imd, or Relish. B, the same cells in A were stimulated with PGN for 6 h, total RNA was extracted, and the induction of Diptericin, Attacin, and Cecropin transcription was analyzed by Northern blotting. Rp49 was probed as a loading control. p35 expression had no affect on AMP gene induction. C, S2* cells were transiently transfected with plasmids expressing p35-T7 and each of the seven Drosophila caspases. Cleavage of p35-T7 protein was monitored by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting using anti-T7 antibody (top panel). Expression of caspases was confirmed using V5 antibody (bottom panel). p35 was not processed in cells overexpressing Dredd or Decay, whereas all other caspases promoted varying degrees of p35-T7 cleavage, suggesting that p35 does not target Dredd or Decay. Black arrowhead, full-length p35; white arrowhead, cleaved form of p35. D, p35 or Imd were used as substrates in cleavage reactions with either FLAG-purified Dredd or commercial human caspase-3. Cleavage of either substrate was monitored by immunoblotting with anti-T7 antibody. Human caspase-3 efficiently cleaved p35, whereas Dredd cleaved Imd but not p35. Black arrowhead, full-length Imd or p35; white arrowhead, cleaved Imd or p35.


manner, and genetic studies suggested that the caspase-8like Dredd was responsible for both of these proteolytic events. Here, we present compelling evidence that Dredd, uniquely among the 7 Drosophila caspases, is able to directly cleave both of these proteins. One caveat remains with the in vitro biochemical assays presented here, as all proteins were expressed and purified from Drosophila S2* cells, rather than a heterologous system. Thus, our protein preparations may contain co-purifying/interacting factors that contribute to these cleavage reactions. Nonetheless, the cell-based overexpression results combined with the biochemical assays strongly argue that Dredd is uniquely and directly cleaving both Imd and Relish. Caspases often autocleave, both to remove their prodomain and to generate mature p20 and p10 catalytic subunits (29). However, the putative small catalytic subunit (p10) of Dredd was almost never detected in our assays with either over-expressed S2* cell-based assays or purified Dredd in vitro. In contrast, mammalian caspase-8 requires interdomain cleavage for its activation during apoptosis (30). Perhaps, more similar to our results with Dredd, activation of caspase-8 does not require interdomain cleavage in certain non-apoptotic roles, such as LPS-induced B-lymphocyte proliferation or when complexed with FLIPL (31, 32). Caspase-9 is another example of initiator caspase that does not require interdomain cleavage for its activation and apoptotic function (33–35). Like Caspase-9, unprocessed Dredd is likely to function as part of a multimeric complex in the Imd signaling pathway. JULY 18, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29

Although the mature p10 domain was not detected in the purified and active Dredd samples, we repeatedly observed several p30-related fragments, possibly indicating multiple cleavage sites between the prodomain and the catalytic domains. Two candidate cleavage site aspartates were substituted with alanine (D2A), however, these failed to prevent generation of p30-related fragments, although the processed fragment in the D2A mutant displayed a slightly faster migration on SDS-PAGE, suggesting alternative cleavage sites. Regardless of the exact location(s) of cleavage to generate the p30-related fragments, this processing does not appear to be critical for the Dredd activity. In our in vitro assays, increasing levels of the kosmotropic agent sodium citrate actually decreased these cleavage events, whereas increasing the level of substrate cleavage. Likewise, p30-related fragments were not observed following immune stimulation in cells expressing moderate (but easily detectable) levels of dual-tagged Dredd. Both in vitro and in cells, production of p30-related fragments does not correlate with either processing of Imd and Relish, or with immune activation more generally. Thus, this prodomain processing is unlikely to be important for Dredd activation during immune signaling, and may even function to inactivate Dredd. Instead, the Death effector domain prodomain is likely critical to form a higher order muiltimeric complex of Dredd along with Fadd, through Death effector domain homotypic interactions, and this complex likely also includes Imd, which interacts with Fadd through the JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

20099


FIGURE 6. Baculovirus p35 protein does not block the Imd pathway signaling in vivo. A, p35 was ectopically expressed in female fat bodies using the Gal4/UAS system and theYp1-Gal4 driver. p35 expressing animals and control genotypes (w1118, UAS-p35 alone, and Yp1-Gal4 alone) were injected with either PBS or live E. coli 1106, whereas uninfected flies were included as a control. After 6 h of immune challenge, real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed to quantify Diptericin induction (top panel) as well as p35 expression (bottom panel). Rp49 was used as reference for normalizing expression. The level of Diptericin induction was notably lower in the Yp1-Gal4 alone animals compared with the wild type strain. Expression of p35, in the UAS-p35/Yp1-Gal4 animals, actually increased Diptericin expression, relative to the driver-only control. Error bars indicate S.D, from two biological replicates. B, the same UAS-p35 transgene was expressed in the developing eye using GMR-Gal4. Expression of p35 strongly suppressed reaper-induced apoptosis in the eye, as expected. Images shown are representative from multiple number of animals for each group.



ble for cleaving Imd and Relish, or if Dredd forms distinct complexes to target each of these substrates. Acknowledgments—We thank John M. Abrams for plasmids, Michael H. Brodsky and Yicktung T. Ip for fly stocks, and Mei Tong for critical reading of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Ganesan, S., Aggarwal, K., Paquette, N., and Silverman, N. (2011) NF-␬B/ Rel proteins and the humoral immune responses of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 349, 25– 60 2. Kleino, A., and Silverman, N. (2014) The Drosophila IMD pathway in the activation of the humoral immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 42, 25–35 3. Georgel, P., Naitza, S., Kappler, C., Ferrandon, D., Zachary, D., Swimmer, C., Kopczynski, C., Duyk, G., Reichhart, J. M., and Hoffmann, J. A. (2001) Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD) is a death domain protein that activates antibacterial defense and can promote apoptosis. Dev. Cell 1, 503–514 4. Kaneko, T., Yano, T., Aggarwal, K., Lim, J. H., Ueda, K., Oshima, Y., Peach, C., Erturk-Hasdemir, D., Goldman, W. E., Oh, B. H., Kurata, S., and Silverman, N. (2006) PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE have essential yet distinct functions in the Drosophila immune response to monomeric DAP-type peptidoglycan. Nat. Immunol. 7, 715–723 5. Naitza, S., Rossé, C., Kappler, C., Georgel, P., Belvin, M., Gubb, D., Camonis, J., Hoffmann, J. A., and Reichhart, J. M. (2002) The Drosophila immune defense against gram-negative infection requires the death protein dFADD. Immunity 17, 575–581 6. Hu, S., and Yang, X. (2000) dFADD, a novel death domain-containing adapter protein for the Drosophila caspase DREDD. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30761–30764 7. Paquette, N., Broemer, M., Aggarwal, K., Chen, L., Husson, M., ErtürkHasdemir, D., Reichhart, J. M., Meier, P., and Silverman, N. (2010) Caspase-mediated cleavage, IAP binding, and ubiquitination: linking three mechanisms crucial for sDrosophila NF-␬B signaling. Mol. Cell 37, 172–182 8. Stöven, S., Ando, I., Kadalayil, L., Engström, Y., and Hultmark, D. (2000) Activation of the Drosophila NF-␬B factor Relish by rapid endoproteolytic cleavage. EMBO Rep. 1, 347–352 9. Stoven, S., Silverman, N., Junell, A., Hedengren-Olcott, M., Erturk, D., Engstrom, Y., Maniatis, T., and Hultmark, D. (2003) Caspase-mediated processing of the Drosophila NF-␬B factor Relish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5991–5996 10. Ertürk-Hasdemir, D., Broemer, M., Leulier, F., Lane, W. S., Paquette, N., Hwang, D., Kim, C. H., Stöven, S., Meier, P., and Silverman, N. (2009) Two roles for the Drosophila IKK complex in the activation of Relish and the induction of antimicrobial peptide genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9779 –9784 11. Fuentes-Prior, P., and Salvesen, G. S. (2004) The protein structures that shape caspase activity, specificity, activation and inhibition. Biochem. J. 384, 201–232 12. Green, D. R. (2011) Means to an end: Apoptosis and Other Cell Death Mechanisms, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 13. Vernooy, S. Y., Copeland, J., Ghaboosi, N., Griffin, E. E., Yoo, S. J., and Hay, B. A. (2000) Cell death regulation in Drosophila: conservation of mechanism and unique insights. J. Cell Biol. 150, F69-F76 14. Hay, B. A., and Guo, M. (2006) Caspase-dependent cell death in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 623– 650 15. Baum, J. S., Arama, E., Steller, H., and McCall, K. (2007) The Drosophila caspases Strica and Dronc function redundantly in programmed cell death during oogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 14, 1508 –1517 16. Lee, G., Wang, Z., Sehgal, R., Chen, C. H., Kikuno, K., Hay, B., and Park, J. H. (2011) Drosophila caspases involved in developmentally regulated programmed cell death of peptidergic neurons during early metamorphosis. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 34 – 48

VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29 • JULY 18, 2014


homotypic Death Domain interface. The quaternary structure of this complex is currently unclear, as well it is not known if this complex is preformed, and activated by PGN stimulation, or if it forms upon immune activation through association with the receptor PGRP-LC. As shown in Figs. 1 and 2E, we observed that only a small fraction of Imd undergoes cleavage following immune stimulation, or forced expression of Dredd in cells, or with purified Dredd in vitro. One explanation of these observations is that Imd has a relatively low affinity for active site of Dredd. Alternatively, it is also plausible that only a fraction of Imd has a cleavage site that is available to Dredd. For example, it was recently shown that RIP1 and RIP3, mammalian counterparts of Imd, form a functional amyloidal signaling complex in vitro and in vivo (36). If Imd similarly forms amyloidal complexes, many of these molecules could have their Dredd cleavage sites obscured within the fibrils. A third possibility is that some of the Imd protein is found in compartments of the cell not available to Dredd. Consistent with this, a large proportion of Imd is found in nucleus (37). On the other hand, most of the Relish expressed in S2* cells was rapidly cleaved following PGN stimulation, suggesting that this process is very efficient. However, forced expression of Dredd was able to cleave only a fraction of Relish. This implies that forced expression of Dredd lacks some unknown factor(s) or modification(s) that are required for efficient cleavage of Relish. One possible modification is polyubiquitination of Dredd and/or Imd. We recently showed that K63-polyubiquitination of both Imd and Dredd are important for Imd signal transduction and these polyubiquitin chains are suggested to form molecular platforms for downstream signaling events (7, 38). We hypothesize that these K63-polyubiquitin chains may enhance Dredd-mediated Relish cleavage, and they are lacking when Dredd is over-expressed. Further studies are required to investigate this hypothesis. Baculovirus p35 protein inhibits many caspases in vitro and apoptosis in vivo (39, 40). Co-crystal structure of p35 and caspase-8 revealed that the aspartate of p35 in the reactive loop forms a thioester with the active cysteine of caspase-8 and undergoes a dramatic conformational change that prevents hydrolysis of this thioester (25). Expression of p35 inhibits Nc-dependent apoptosis by antagonizing effector caspases Ice and Dcp1, but it does not inhibit Nc itself (27, 28). Two earlier reports concluded that p35 inhibits Imd signaling, thus suggesting that p35 inhibits Dredd (3, 26). On the other hand, here we present biochemical and genetic evidence demonstrating that p35 is not a Dredd inhibitor and accordingly does not inhibit Imd and Relish cleavage, nor AMP gene induction. Importantly, our genetic assays include critical control genotypes, which were absent from earlier studies. The Yp1-Gal4 driver alone is particularly critical, as it shows a marked reduction in AMP expression compared with other wild type strains. In this study, we show that Dredd is the only Drosophila caspase that can promote Imd and Relish cleavage, and that Imd and Relish are direct substrates of Dredd. It will be interesting to learn if it is the same Dredd complex that is responsi-


JULY 18, 2014 • VOLUME 289 • NUMBER 29

Chem. 285, 16632–16642 31. Kang, T. B., Oh, G. S., Scandella, E., Bolinger, B., Ludewig, B., Kovalenko, A., and Wallach, D. (2008) Mutation of a self-processing site in caspase-8 compromises its apoptotic but not its nonapoptotic functions in bacterial artificial chromosome-transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 181, 2522–2532 32. Pop, C., Oberst, A., Drag, M., Van Raam, B. J., Riedl, S. J., Green, D. R., and Salvesen, G. S. (2011) FLIP(L) induces caspase 8 activity in the absence of interdomain caspase 8 cleavage and alters substrate specificity. Biochem. J. 433, 447– 457 33. Stennicke, H. R., Deveraux, Q. L., Humke, E. W., Reed, J. C., Dixit, V. M., and Salvesen, G. S. (1999) Caspase-9 can be activated without proteolytic processing. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8359 – 8362 34. Denault, J. B., Eckelman, B. P., Shin, H., Pop, C., and Salvesen, G. S. (2007) Caspase 3 attenuates XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein)-mediated inhibition of caspase 9. Biochem. J. 405, 11–19 35. Malladi, S., Challa-Malladi, M., Fearnhead, H. O., and Bratton, S. B. (2009) The Apaf-1䡠procaspase-9 apoptosome complex functions as a proteolyticbased molecular timer. EMBO J. 28, 1916 –1925 36. Li, J., McQuade, T., Siemer, A. B., Napetschnig, J., Moriwaki, K., Hsiao, Y. S., Damko, E., Moquin, D., Walz, T., McDermott, A., Chan, F. K., and Wu, H. (2012) The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell 150, 339 –350 37. Boyer, L., Magoc, L., Dejardin, S., Cappillino, M., Paquette, N., Hinault, C., Charriere, G. M., Ip, W. K., Fracchia, S., Hennessy, E., Erturk-Hasdemir, D., Reichhart, J. M., Silverman, N., Lacy-Hulbert, A., and Stuart, L. M. (2011) Pathogen-derived effectors trigger protective immunity via activation of the Rac2 enzyme and the IMD or Rip kinase signaling pathway. Immunity 35, 536 –549 38. Meinander, A., Runchel, C., Tenev, T., Chen, L., Kim, C. H., Ribeiro, P. S., Broemer, M., Leulier, F., Zvelebil, M., Silverman, N., and Meier, P. (2012) Ubiquitylation of the initiator caspase DREDD is required for innate immune signalling. EMBO J. 31, 2770 –2783 39. Miller, L. K. (1999) An exegesis of IAPs: salvation and surprises from BIR motifs. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 323–328 40. Zhou, Q., Krebs, J. F., Snipas, S. J., Price, A., Alnemri, E. S., Tomaselli, K. J., and Salvesen, G. S. (1998) Interaction of the baculovirus anti-apoptotic protein p35 with caspases. Specificity, kinetics, and characterization of the caspase/p35 complex. Biochemistry 37, 10757–10765

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

20101


17. Chen, P., Rodriguez, A., Erskine, R., Thach, T., and Abrams, J. M. (1998) Dredd, a novel effector of the apoptosis activators reaper, grim, and hid in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 201, 202–216 18. Rodriguez, A., Oliver, H., Zou, H., Chen, P., Wang, X., and Abrams, J. M. (1999) Dark is a Drosophila homologue of Apaf-1/CED-4 and functions in an evolutionarily conserved death pathway. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1, 272–279 19. Bunch, T. A., Grinblat, Y., and Goldstein, L. S. (1988) Characterization and use of the Drosophila metallothionein promoter in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 1043–1061 20. Aggarwal, K., Rus, F., Vriesema-Magnuson, C., Ertürk-Hasdemir, D., Paquette, N., and Silverman, N. (2008) Rudra interrupts receptor signaling complexes to negatively regulate the IMD pathway. PLoS Pathog. 4, e1000120 21. Denault, J. B., and Salvesen, G. S. (2008) Apoptotic caspase activation and activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 414, 191–220 22. White, K., Tahaoglu, E., and Steller, H. (1996) Cell killing by the Drosophila gene reaper. Science 271, 805– 807 23. Hay, B. A., Wolff, T., and Rubin, G. M. (1994) Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development 120, 2121–2129 24. White, E., and Stillman, B. (1987) Expression of adenovirus E1B mutant phenotypes is dependent on the host cell and on synthesis of E1A proteins. J. Virol. 61, 426 – 435 25. Xu, G., Cirilli, M., Huang, Y., Rich, R. L., Myszka, D. G., and Wu, H. (2001) Covalent inhibition revealed by the crystal structure of the caspase-8/p35 complex. Nature 410, 494 – 497 26. Guntermann, S., and Foley, E. (2011) The protein Dredd is an essential component of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway in the Drosophila immune response. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 30284 –30294 27. Hawkins, C. J., Yoo, S. J., Peterson, E. P., Wang, S. L., Vernooy, S. Y., and Hay, B. A. (2000) The Drosophila caspase DRONC cleaves following glutamate or aspartate and is regulated by DIAP1, HID, and GRIM. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 27084 –27093 28. Meier, P., Silke, J., Leevers, S. J., and Evan, G. I. (2000) The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. EMBO J. 19, 598 – 611 29. Pop, C., and Salvesen, G. S. (2009) Human caspases: activation, specificity, and regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 21777–21781 30. Oberst, A., Pop, C., Tremblay, A. G., Blais, V., Denault, J. B., Salvesen, G. S., and Green, D. R. (2010) Inducible dimerization and inducible cleavage reveal a requirement for both processes in caspase-8 activation. J. Biol.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The Caspase-8 Homolog Dredd Cleaves Imd and Relish but Is Not Inhibited by p35* Chan-Hee Kim1, Donggi Paik1, Florentina Rus and Neal Silverman2 From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605

SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS Figure S1. Affinity purification of recombinant Dredd proteins. (A) 500 ng of affinity purified Dredd was analyzed by Coomassie Blue staining. (B) 50 ng of purified Dredd protein was used for immunoblotting (right). Black arrowhead; full length Dredd, white arrowhead; cleaved forms of Dredd. Figure. S2 Affinity-purified Dredd cleaves Imd and Relish in vitro. Reaction mixtures after cleavage assay with FLAG-DreddCA-V5 in Figure 2A were TCA-precipitated and analyzed by immunoblotting to confirm equal loading of recombinant protein per reaction. Note the lack of auto-processed p30 fragment. Black arrowhead; full length Dredd. Figure S3. TEV protease-mediated processing of Dredd fails to induce activity. (A) TEV cleavage site was engineered in the linker between the predicted large and small subunits of Dredd. (B) DreddTEV and increasing amounts of a TEV expressing plasmid were co-transfected into S2* cells and processing was monitored by IP-IB. Increasing TEV-6His expression produced the expected p10-like fragment (top panel, asterisk) but failed to drive cleavage of either Imd or Relish, as seen with expression of wild type Dredd. Black arrowhead; full length Dredd, Imd, Relish, white arrowhead; cleaved forms of Dredd, Imd, Relish. Figure S4. Expression of baculovirus p35 protein does not inhibit Dredd-mediated cleavage of Imd and Relish proteins in S2* cells. (A) p35 expression, from copper inducible metallothionein promoter in stably transfected S2* cells in Figure 5A, was monitored by straight immunoblotting with anti-T7 antibody. Black arrowhead; p35-T7. (B) Reciprocal IP-IB from experiments in Figure 5C show interactions between p35 and caspases.

FL

FL

AG

AG FL 150 102 76

150 102 76

52

52

38

38

31

31

24

24

17

17

Coomassie Blue

FL -Dr AG ed -D d WT re dd C V5 A -V 5

r AG edd W -D T re dd C V5 A -V 5

B

-D

A

IB : α-V5

Kim et.al. Figure S1

FLAG-DreddCA-V5 NaCit (M)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

kDa 76 52 38 31 24 17

IB: α-V5


A Prodomain (29.44 kDa) FLAG

DED

DED

Catalytic Domain (29.24 kDa) Large subunit QACQE 408

Small subunit

B FLAG-DreddTEV-V5

FL

TEV plasmid (μg) 10 0 0.1 0.5 1 2 4 6

A FL G-D AG re -D dd W T re dd C -V A 5 -V 5

Wild type FRIDVTTVSPDQHIDMLR TEV-cleavable FRIDVTTVSENLYFQSLR 425 432 436

76 52 38 IP : α-V5 31 IB : α-V5 24 17 12

IB : α-His

31 24

* TEV

38

IB : α-Imd

31 24 150 102

IB : α-Rel-C

76 52 38


V5

A

FLAG-p35-T7 ++

Cu PGN IB : α-T7

- - + + - + - +

52 38 31 24

B

Dr

ea Dr m-V5 ed Dr d WT e -V Nc dd CA 5 -V Ice 5 V5 Dc V5 p De 1-V5 c Da ay-V 5 m p3 m-V 5-T 5 7

FLAG-p35-T7

52

IP : α-T7 38 IB : α-V5 31 24


The Caspase-8 Homolog Dredd Cleaves Imd and Relish but Is Not Inhibited by p35 Chan-Hee Kim, Donggi Paik, Florentina Rus and Neal Silverman J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289:20092-20101. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.544841 originally published online June 2, 2014

Access the most updated version of this article at doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.544841 Alerts: • When this article is cited • When a correction for this article is posted

Supplemental material: http://www.jbc.org/content/suppl/2014/06/02/M113.544841.DC1.html This article cites 39 references, 20 of which can be accessed free at http://www.jbc.org/content/289/29/20092.full.html#ref-list-1


Click here to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alerts