Enterocytozoon bieneusi Genotypes in Dogs in Bogota ... - CiteSeerX

0 downloads 0 Views 48KB Size Report
Reetz J, Rinder H, Thomschke A, Manke H, Schwebs M, Brud- erek A, 2002. First detection of the microsporidium Enterocy- tozoon bieneusi in non-mammalian ...
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(2), 2008, pp. 215–217 Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Enterocytozoon bieneusi Genotypes in Dogs in Bogota, Colombia Mónica Santín,* Jesús A. Cortés Vecino, and Ronald Fayer Environmental Microbial Safety Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland; Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Bogotá, Colombia

Abstract. Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected in dogs in Bogota, Colombia for the first time. Of 120 dogs, 15% were positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Infected dogs ranged from 2 to 14 years of age, and more male than female dogs were infected with E. bieneusi (20% versus 5%). All PCR-positive specimens were sequenced and three genotypes were identified. A dog-specific genotype (PtEbIX) was identified in feces from 16 dogs. For two dogs, the nucleotide sequences obtained were genetically identical to the E. bieneusi Peru 5 and K genotypes previously reported as human pathogens. This is the first time that Peru 5 and K genotypes have been identified in dogs. This study confirms that dogs are infected with both human pathogenic and host-specific genotypes.

Microsporidian infections in humans have been reported worldwide, and Microsporidia are recognized as emerging opportunistic pathogens of humans. Enterocytozoon bieneusi, the most common species reported in humans,1 is responsible for chronic diarrhea and a wasting diathesis in immunocompromised patients, such as in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and organ transplant recipients.2–8 This species also infects immnunocompetent persons.9–12 The transmission routes and sources of human infections are not known. Animals are a likely source of human infections because microsporidia have been found in fecal specimens of many domestic and wild mammals, as well as birds.13–19 Molecular methods have shown considerable genetic variation among isolates of E. bieneusi. Analyses of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences have identified more than 70 genotypes of E. bieneusi.15,16,20–22 Some of these genotypes have been recognized as host-specific, and others have been found to infect humans and animals, supporting the likelihood of zoonotic transmission.3,13,15,21 For example, in a recent study the E. bieneusi genotype Peru16 was detected in the feces of seven household guinea pigs and in the stool of a child living in the same house.23 To date, there is little information available on the prevalence of E. bieneusi in companion animals. There have been only relatively few studies of cats and dogs.13,19,21,24–26 Zoonotic genotypes of E. bieneusi have been identified in cats in Portugal and Colombia13,19 and in dogs in Portugal.19 Only 13 natural infections of dogs with E. bieneusi have been documented, and molecular information was included for only 9 of those dogs.19,24–26 The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of E. bieneusi in dog feces using molecular methods and sequence analysis of the ITS region of ribosomal DNA to identify E. bieneusi genotypes.

that were labeled, sealed, cooled, and shipped overnight to the U.S. Department of Agriculture laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland. Dogs ranged from days to years of age and were grouped as follows: < 6 months (n ⳱ 16), 6–12 months (n ⳱ 8), and > 2 years (n ⳱ 96) (Table 1). Feces were cleaned of debris by using CsCl to concentrate spores and total DNA was extracted from each CsCl-cleaned fecal specimen using a DNeasyTissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) with a slightly modified protocol as described.27 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed using a set of nested primers specific for E. bieneusi that amplified the ITS region as well as a portion of the flanking large and small subunit ribosomal RNA genes.20 The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and visualized by staining the gel with ethidium bromide. Negative and positive controls were included in all PCRs. Negative controls from the first PCR were amplified in a second reaction to check for low-level contamination. All PCR-positive samples were purified using EXO-SAP enzyme (U.S. Biochemical Corporation, Cleveland, OH). Purified PCR products were sequenced on both strands with the same primers used for the secondary PCR amplification using Big Dye™ chemistry and an ABI3100 sequence analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequence chromatograms from each strand were aligned and inspected using the Lasergene software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI). Sequences of these fragments were compared with sequences in the GenBank database by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool analysis (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). Nucleotide sequences of E. bieneusi isolates from dogs were deposited in GenBank under accession nos. EU650271 to EU650273. The prevalence of E. bieneusi was compared between sexes of dogs. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data and differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Fecal samples from 120 stray dogs (80 males and 40 females) from Bogota, Colombia were placed in plastic bags

Of 120 dog fecal samples tested for the presence of E. bieneusi, 18 (15%) were positive (Table 1). Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected only in adult dogs (16 of 80) (Table 1) that ranged from 2–14 years of age (Table 2). More male (16 of 80) than female (2 of 40) dogs were infected with E. bieneusi (P ⳱ 0.0320, by Fisher’s exact test) (Table 1). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the ITS region showed three distinct genotypes of E. bieneusi. Of the 18 E. bieneusi

INTRODUCTION

* Address correspondence to Mónica Santín, Environmental Microbial Safety Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, BARC-East, Building 173, Beltsville, MD 20705. E-mail: [email protected]

215

216

SANTI´ N AND OTHERS

TABLE 1 Number of dogs examined, number of dogs positive, and prevalence (%) of Enterocytozoon bieneusi by age and sex Characteristic

No. of dogs

Age groups < 6 months 6–12 months > 2 years Sex Male Female Total

No. (%) positive

16 8 96

0 (0) 0 (0) 18 (19)

80 40 120

16 (20) 2 (5) 18 (15)

sequences that were generated, 16 isolates were identical to published nucleotide sequences from one dog from Portugal (genotype PtEb IX; GenBank accession no. DQ885585) and three dogs from Switzerland (GenBank accession no. AF059610). One isolate was identical to the published E. bieneusi ITS sequences from genotype K (also identified as genotypes IV, BEB5, and Peru2) isolated from humans, cattle, and cats (GenBank accession nos. AF267141, AF242478, AY371277, AY331009, DQ885579, and DQ836343). Another isolate was identical to the E. bieneusi ITS sequences from genotype Peru 5 (also identified as genotype WL11) isolated from humans, cats, and foxes (GenBank accession nos. AY371280, AY237219, and DQ836344). Mixed infections with more than one genotype of E. bieneusi were not detected. DISCUSSION The present study confirms the presence of E. bieneusi in dogs from Colombia. A PCR assay showed that the overall prevalence of E. bieneusi in 120 dogs was 15% as assessed by examination of one fecal sample from each dog. However, the true prevalence might be higher because excretion of spores can be intermittent.16 In a survey conducted in Germany, 60 dogs were tested by nested PCR for E. bieneusi but none were positive.21 Only 13 other natural infections with E. bieneusi have

TABLE 2 Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes determined by sequence analysis in each positive dog Age, years

Sex

E. bieneusi genotype*

2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5.5 6 6 6 6 11 11 12 12 14

Male Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Male

PtEbIX K PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX PtEbIX Peru5 PtEbIX PtEbIX

* Genotype PtEb IX (GenBank Accession nos. DQ885585 and AF059610); genotype K is identical to IV, BEB5 and Peru2 (GenBank accession nos. AF267141, AF242478, AY371277, AY331009, DQ885579, and DQ836343); Peru 5 is identical to WL11 (GenBank accession nos. AY371280, AY237219, and DQ836344).

been documented in dogs from Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland.19,24–26 The prevalence in Colombia is slightly higher than obtained by microscopy in Spain (10.8% and 11.7%),23,24 and by PCR in Switzerland (8.3%).26 Our results suggest that E. bieneusi could be a common parasite in dogs, one that has remained unrecognized because it is not possible to detect this parasite by routine coproscopic methods. It is unclear why infections were not observed in dogs less than two years of age. The prevalence was significantly higher in males than females (20% versus 5%). Higher prevalences in males than in females have been observed in fur-bearing wild mammals and cats13,15 but the underlying reason for this difference is not known. The genetic analysis of the ribosomal DNA ITS of E. bieneusi from dogs showed three genotypes. The genotype PtEbIX (GenBank accession nos. DQ885585 and AF059610) was the most prevalent genotype identified in 16 (89%) of the 18 positive dogs. Until now this genotype had been identified only in dogs in Portugal and Switzerland. Although data on the epidemiology of E. bieneusi in animals are still spare, our findings suggest that this genotype is dog specific.19,24,26 The other two genotypes found in the present study, Peru5 and K, have not been identified in dogs. Genotype Peru5 (also known as WL11) has been identified in humans in Peru,3 in a cat in Colombia,13 and in a fox in the United States15 (GenBank accession nos. AY371280, DQ836344, and AY237219), and genotype K (also identified as genotypes IV, PtEbIII, BEB5, and Peru2) has been identified in humans in Cameroon, France, Gabon, Germany, Niger, Peru, Uganda, and the United Kingdom,3,5–7,11,21,28 in cats in Colombia and Portugal,13,19 and in cattle in Portugal and in the United States29 (GenBank accession nos. AF242478, AF267141, AY371277, DQ836343, DQ885579, and AY331009). Therefore, this is the first time that genotypes K and Peru5, which are considered zoonotic genotypes, have been found in dogs. The current data indicate that dogs appear to be infected with human pathogenic and host-adapted genotypes. Our results also imply the existence of two distinct E. bieneusi populations cycling in dogs, with the dog-specific genotype appearing to have a dog-to-dog transmission and genotypes K, Peru5, Peru6, and Peru9 appearing to have the potential for zoonotic transmission from dogs to humans and vice versa. Although only a small portion of the E. bieneusi identified in dogs have the potential to infect humans, dogs could serve as a potential reservoir host for zoonotic E. bieneusi genotypes. Therefore, our findings strongly suggest that properly designed studies are needed to assess the role of dogs as a source of zoonotic microsporidiosis. On the basis of our results, dogs should be tested for E. bieneusi, especially in homes with high risk inhabitants such as immunocompromised persons. Received January 8, 2008. Accepted for publication May 5, 2008. Authors’ addresses: Mónica Santín and Ronald Fayer, Environmental Microbial Safety Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Building 173, BARC-East, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705. Jesús A. Cortés Vecino, Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Bogotá, Colombia.

REFERENCES 1. Mathis A, Weber R, Desplazes P, 2005. Zoonotic potential of the Microsporidia. Clin Microbiol Rev 18: 423–445.

ENTEROCYTOZOON BIENEUSI IN DOGS

2. Rabodonirina M, Bertocchi M, Desportes-Livage I, Cotte L, Levrey H, Piens MA, Monneret G, Celard M, Mornex JF, Mojon M, 1996. Enterocytozoon bieneusi as a cause of chronic diarrhea in a heart-lung transplant recipient who was seronegative for human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 23: 114–117. 3. Sulaiman IM, Bern C, Gilman R, Cama V, Kawai V, Vargas D, Ticona E, Vivar A, Xiao L, 2003. A molecular biologic study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in HIV-infected patients in Lima, Peru. J Eukaryot Microbiol 50: 591–596. 4. Guerard A, Rabodonirina M, Cotte L, Liguory O, Piens MA, Daoud S, Picot S, Touraine JL, 1999. Intestinal microsporidiosis occurring in two renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Transplantation 68: 699–707. 5. Liguory O, Sarfati C, Derouin F, Molina JM, 2001. Evidence of different Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 39: 2672–2674. 6. Sadler F, Peake N, Borrow R, Rowl PL, Wilkins EG, Curry A, 2002. Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in AIDS patients from the north west of England. J Infect 44: 39–42. 7. Espern A, Morio F, Miegeville M, Illa H, Abdoulaye M, Meyssonnier V, Adehossi E, Lejeune A, Cam PD, Besse B, GayAndriev F, 2007. Molecular study of microsporidiosis due to Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients from two geographical areas: Niamey, Niger, and Hanoi, Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2999–3002. 8. Bern C, Kawai V, Vargas D, Rabke-Verani J, Williamson J, Chavez-Valdez R, Xiao L, Sulaiman I, Vivar A, Ticona E, Navincopa M, Cama V, Moura H, Secor WE, Visvesvara G, Gilman RH, 2005. The epidemiology of intestinal microsporidiosis in patients with HIV/AIDS in Lima, Peru. J Infect Dis 191: 1658–1664. 9. Tumwine JK, Kekitiinwa A, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Ndeezi G, Downing R, Feng X, Akiyoshi DE, Tzipori S, 2005. Cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis in Ugandan children with persistent diarrhea with and without concurrent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 921–925. 10. Gumbo T, Gangaidzo IT, Sarbah S, Carville A, Tzipori S, Wiest PM, 2000. Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection in patients without evidence of immunosuppression: two cases from Zimbabwe found to have positive stools by PCR. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 94: 699–702. 11. Breton J, Bart-Delabesse E, Biligui S, Carbone A, Seiller X, Okome-Nkoumou M, Nzamba C, Kombila M, Accoceberry I, Thellier M, 2007. Biodiversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes from humans in Gabon and Cameroon includes a new highly divergent sequence. J Cli Microbiol 45: 2580–2589. 12. Nkinin SW, Asonganyi T, Didier ES, Kaneshiro ES, 2007. Microsporidian infection is prevalent in healthy people in Cameroon. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2841–2846. 13. Santín M, Trout JM, Cortés Vecino JA, Dubey JP, Fayer R, 2006. Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in cats from Bogota (Colombia) and genotyping of isolates. Vet Parasitol 141: 334–339. 14. Fayer R, Santín M, Trout JM, 2003. First detection of microsporidia in dairy calves in North America. Parasitol Res 90: 383–386.

217

15. Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Lal AA, Trout JM, Schaefer FW III, Xiao L, 2003. Molecular characterization of Microsporidia indicates that wild mammals harbor host-adapted Enterocytozoon spp. as well as human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 4495–4501. 16. Breitenmoser AC, Mathis A, Bürgi E, Weber R, Deplazes P, 1999. High prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine with four genotypes that differ from those identified in humans. Parasitology 118: 447–453. 17. Reetz J, Rinder H, Thomschke A, Manke H, Schwebs M, Bruderek A, 2002. First detection of the microsporidium Enterocytozoon bieneusi in non-mammalian hosts (chickens). Int J Parasitol 32: 785–787. 18. Lobo ML, Xiao L, Cama V, Magalhães N, Antunes F, Matos O, 2006. Identification of potentially human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in various birds. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 7380–7382. 19. Lobo ML, Xiao L, Cama V, Stevens T, Antunes F, Matos O, 2006. Genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in mammals in Portugal. J Eukaryot Microbiol 53: S61–S64. 20. Buckholt MA, Lee JH, Tzipori S, 2002. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine: an 18-month survey at a slaughterhouse in Massachusetts. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2595–2599. 21. Dengjel B, Zahler M, Hermanns W, Heinritzi K, Spillmann T, Thomschke A, Loscher T, Gothe R, Rinder H, 2001. Zoonotic Potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. J Clin Microbiol 39: 4495–4499. 22. Leelayoova S, Subrungruang I, Suputtamongkol Y, Worapong J, Petmitr PC, Mungthin M, 2006. Identification of genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from stool samples from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Thailand. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3001–3004. 23. Cama VA, Pearson J, Cabrera L, Pacheco L, Gilman R, Meyer S, Ortega Y, Xiao L, 2007. Transmission of Enterocytozoon bieneusi between a child and guinea pigs. J Clin Microbiol 45: 2708–2710. 24. del Aguila C, Izquierdo F, Navajas R, Pieniazek NJ, Miró G, Alonso AI, da Silva AJ, Fenoy S, 1999. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in animals: rabbits and dogs as new hosts. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46: S8–S9. 25. Lores B, del Aguila C, Arias C, 2002. Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia) in faecal samples from domestic animals from Galica, Spain. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97: 941–945. 26. Mathis A, Breitenmoser AC, Deplazes P, 1999. Detection of new Enterocytozoon genotypes in faecal samples of farm dogs and a cat. Parasite 6: 189–193. 27. Fayer R, Trout JM, Craczyk TD, Lewis EJ, 2000. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Eimeria infections in postweaned and adult cattle on three Maryland farms. Vet Parasitol 93: 103–112. 28. Tumwine JK, Kekitiinwa A, Nabukeera N, Akiyoshi DE, Buckholt MA, Tzipori S, 2002. Enterocytozoon bieneusi among children with diarrhea attending Mulago hospital in Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67: 299–303. 29. Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Yang C, Santin M, Matos O, Xiao L, 2004. Molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in cattle indicates that only some isolates have zoonotic potential. Parasitol Res 92: 328–334.