Erratum

8 downloads 0 Views 162KB Size Report
system for percutaneous nephnostomies. Radiology. 1982; 144:174. 5. Clayman. RV, Castaneda-Zuniga. WR, Hunt- en DW, Lange. PH, Amplatz. K. Rapid bal-.
References 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Clayman R, Smith A. Rusnak BM, Herrera M, Amplatz K. Nephrostolithotomy: percutaneous techniques for urinary calculus removal. AJR 1982; 139:721-726. Hare WSC, McOmish D. Nephnostomy lavage set for dissolving renal stones. Radiology 1982; 144:932. Bush WH, Crane RE, Brannen GE. Steerable loop snare for percutaneous retrieval of renal calix calculi. AIR 1984; 142367-368. Rusnak B, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Kotula F, Herrera M, Amplatz K. Improved dilator system for percutaneous nephnostomies. Radiology 1982; 144:174. Clayman RV, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Hunten DW, Lange PH, Amplatz K. Rapid balloon dilatation of the nephrostomy track for nephrostolithotomy. Radiology 1983; 147:884-885. Ricketts HJ, Rudd TG, Marcus VL, Knieger JN. Pneumopyelography: an adjunct to percutaneous nephnostomy and nephnolithotomy. AJR 1984; 143:1093-1095.

ing the initial diagnosis of sclenosing cholangitis in which the cholangiographic appearance is often indistinguishable from cholangiocancinoma. In their series, the histologic diagnosis was obtained by duct biopsy either at lapamotomy on at autopsy. However, biopsy of the bile ducts at surgery fails to detect this

disease

Primary

Sclerosing Cholangitis: Cholangiographic Appearances From:

Alan B. Lumsden, M.D. Jonathan P. Alspaugh, M.D. Departments of Surgery and Radiology Emory

University

Hospital

1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, CA 30322

N.E.

Editor: We read with interest the article entitIed “Cholangiocancinoma Complicating Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Cholangiographic Appearances” by MacCarty et al. (1), and we congratulate them on an excellent

review

of a difficult

subject.

De-

spite identifying marked duct dilatation, progressive duct dilatation, and prognessive stricture formation as indicators of cholangiocarcinoma, they concede that none of these features is specific for malignancy; hence, some doubt usually pensists.

A similar

dilemma

also

occurs

a

Radiology

of cases reliable. treatment

and, of

sclenosing cholangitis at our institution is nonopenative management. The initial diagnosis is largely based on the cholangiographic appearance obtained during eithem percutaneous transhepatic cholangiognaphy on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When possible, treatment with percutaneous cholangioplasty

and

long-term

stenting

is pen-

formed. We have some concern, themefore, that cholangiocancinoma could be misdiagnosed either during the initial diagnosis of sclemosing cholangitis or duning follow-up of a true-positive case of cholangitis

where

often.

We

suggest

that

bile

MacCarty

We

and

and

would

like

Alspaugh

cemning ma

our

for their article

complicating

The

trend

erative liver

colleagues

to thank on

comments

institution

management

until

transplantation

Lumsden

con-

cholangiocancino-

sclenosing

at our

respond:

Drs.

cholangitis.

is also such

becomes

nonop-

time

as

necessary.

We, too, are excited by the potential role of bile cytology in the evaluation of patients with sclenosing cholangitis/cholangiocamcinoma

and

are

just

beginning

to

investigate this potential in a systematic way. As our results become available, we will with

look forward those of Dr.

to comparing Lumsden and

them Dr. Als-

paugh. Robert L. MacCarty, M.D. Department of Diagnostic Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905

Radiology

cholangio-

carcinoma develops as a complication. Consequently, we are currently obtaining bile specimens either by aspiration, brushing, or both during percutaneous cholangioplasty and stenting. The reported sensitivity of bile cytology for detecting malignancy ranges from 34% to 87% (2); however, there are no data in the litenatume concerning its value in sclenosing cholangitis where inflammatory activity may make cytologic interpretation difficult. Further evaluation is necessary. Primary sclemosing cholangitis is now being recognized with increased fmequency, and it is likely that this diagnostic dilemma will be encountered much more

Erratum Radiology

1985;

156:596

The Assessment Centres for diagnostic madiological equipment are operated under the auspices of the Department of Health and Social Security, London, England.

cytology

should be performed on all patients suspected of having sclenosing cholangitis, both initially and intermittently during follow-up,

to rule

out

cholangiocarci-

noma.

References 1.

dun2.

856

to 20%

therefore, is not completely The current trend for

sclenosing

Cholangiocarcinoma Complicating

in up

UDr.

MacCanty RL, LaRusso NF, May GR, et al. Cholangiocancinoma complicating primary sclenosing cholangitis: cholangiographic appearances. Radiology 1985; 156:43-46. Cohan RH, Illescas FF, Newman GE, Braun SD, Dunnick NR. Biliary cytodiagnosis: bile sampling for cytology. Invest Radiol 1985; 20:177-179.

March

1986