Semester 1 2011/2012. School of Bioprocess Engineering. ERT 423 Final Year
Project. Rubric Assessment For Proposal Defence Presentation. Criteria.
Semester 1 2011/2012 School of Bioprocess Engineering
ERT 423 Final Year Project Rubric Assessment For Proposal Defence Presentation Marginal Adequate Good Excellent 1-2 Marks 3-5 Marks 6-8 Marks 9-10 Marks Problem Statement – The description of the The description of the The description of the The description of the Concise description of the project problem statement project problem statement project problem project problem statement is issues that needs to be is unclearly addressed. statement is generally clearly addressed. is somewhat addressed. addressed. addressed. Criteria
Objectives and Scopes – The objectives and scopes The objectives and scopes Sufficiency for final year description of the project description of the project is somewhat describes the is unclear. degree level. project.
The objectives and scopes description of the project is generally describe the project.
The objectives and scopes description of the project is strongly describe the project.
Marginal 1-4 Marks Literature Review – The pieces of evidence are Relevance of information relevant and accurate, but are isolated, addressing presented one aspect of the project.
Adequate 5-10 Marks The evidence is relevant, accurate and covers several aspects of the project. Little evidence of an overall view of the causes.
Good 11-16 Marks The evidence presents a good appreciation of general trust of the project. Good coverage with relevant and accurate support.
Excellent 17-20 Marks As in “Good” but with higher degree of originality and evidence of internalization into personalize model of practice.
Methodology – Accuracy of information presented and availability of equipments
Overview of methods is omitted, methodological details are emphasized. Process flow of the experiments/ simulations is partly explained.
Methods are generally described. Process flow of the experiments/ simulations that strengthen or contribute to results is explained.
Methods are clearly described. Process flow of the experiments/ simulations that strengthen or contribute to results is strongly supported with suitable detail.
Criteria
Methods are not described, or incorrectly described. Process flow of the experiments/simulations is confused.
Semester 1 2011/2012 School of Bioprocess Engineering
Criteria Adequacy of Engineering Components in the Project – Design elements, synthesis, modelling, simulation etc. Project Gantt Chart – Relevance to complete the project within the allocated time frame. Delivery I – Communication (Q/A)
Marginal 1-2 Marks Application of engineering elements such as design, synthesis, mathematical modelling, or simulation in the project is lack. Project gantt incoherent.
chart
Adequate 3-5 Marks Application of engineering elements such as design, synthesis, mathematical modelling, or simulation in the project is adequate.
is Project gantt adequate.
chart
Answer at least one question correctly. Need clarification.
Good 6-8 Marks Application of engineering elements such as design, synthesis, mathematical modelling, or simulation in the project is good. is Project gantt chart is clear.
Answer most questions correctly. Need clarification sometimes. Delivery II – Presentation Bare organization and Basic organization and skills preparation. preparation. Lack of confidence and Confident in only some familiarity in some parts of parts of the presentation. the presentation.
Note: Any work that fails to reach the marginal standard will be given 0 point.
Answer most questions correctly and concisely.
Excellent 9-10 Marks Application of engineering elements such as design, synthesis, mathematical modelling, or simulation in the project is strongly used. Project gantt chart excellent organized.
is
Handle difficult questions with ease and confidence. Illustrative explanation.
Good organization and Excellent organization and preparation. preparation. Confident in most parts Confident and relaxed in the of the presentation. whole presentation.
