Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoS is ... - CiteSeerX

Microbiology (2004), 150, 843–851

DOI 10.1099/mic.0.26703-0

Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoS is controlled by quorum sensing and RpoS Michael Hogardt,* Maximilian Roeder,* Anna Maria Schreff, Leo Eberl3 and Ju¨rgen Heesemann Correspondence Ju¨rgen Heesemann [email protected]. uni-muenchen.de

Received 13 August 2003 Revised

6 January 2004

Accepted 8 January 2004

Max von Pettenkofer-Institut fu¨r Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 9a, D-80336 Munich, Germany

In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, virulence determinants and biofilm formation are coordinated via a hierarchical quorum sensing cascade, which involves the transcriptional regulators LasR and RhlR and their cognate homoserine lactone activators C12-HSL [N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone] and C4-HSL (N-butanoyl-L-homoserine lactone), which are produced by LasI and RhlI, respectively. The exoenzyme S regulon of P. aeruginosa, comprises genes for a type III secretion system and for four anti-host effector proteins (ExoS, T, U and Y), which are translocated into host cells. It is a reasonable assumption that this ExoS regulon should be downregulated in the biofilm growth state and thus should also be under the regulatory control of the Las/Rhl system. Therefore, an exoS9-gfp reporter construct was used, and the influence of the Las and Rhl quorum sensing systems and the effect of the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS on regulation of the exoS gene was examined. Evidence is provided for downregulation of exoS during biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa PAO1. The rhlI mutant PDO100 and rhlR mutant PDO111, but not the lasI mutant PDO-JP1, showed approximately twofold upregulation of the exoS9-gfp reporter in comparison to PAO1. Upregulation of exoS9-gfp in the PDO100 mutant could be repressed to normal level by adding C4-HSL autoinducer, indicating a negative regulatory effect of RhlR/C4-HSL on exoS expression. As RhlR/C4-HSL is also involved in regulation of RpoS, the P. aeruginosa rpoS mutant SS24 was examined and the exoS9-gfp reporter was found to be fivefold upregulated in comparison to PAO1. For the first time evidence is reported for a regulatory cascade linking RhlR/RhlI and RpoS with the expression of the anti-host effector ExoS, part of the exoenzyme S regulon. Moreover, these data suggest that the exoenzyme S regulon may be downregulated in P. aeruginosa biofilms.

INTRODUCTION Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an increasingly prevalent opportunistic human pathogen, is the most common Gram-negative bacterium found in infections of immunocompromised patients and of individuals suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF). Once P. aeruginosa has taken residence in the lungs of CF patients, it contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality in this population. The pseudomonads, which are seldom eradicated by antibacterial chemotherapy, chronically colonize the bronchoalveolar lumen of CF lungs and lead to recurrent pulmonal *Michael Hogardt and Maximilian Roeder contributed equally to this work. 3Present address: Lehrstuhl fu¨r Mikrobiologie, Technische Universita¨t Munich, Freising, Germany. Abbreviations: AHL, N-acylhomoserine lactones; C4-HSL, N-butanoyllactone; C12-HSL, N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone; CF, cystic fibrosis; GFP, green fluorescent protein; SM, stimulation medium; TTSS, type III secretion system; VB, Vogel–Bonner. L-homoserine

0002-6703 G 2004 SGM

Printed in Great Britain

exacerbations, resulting in a progressive decline in lung function. Various virulence determinants have been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa. The production of multiple of these virulence factors, including elastase, alkaline protease, LasA protease, phospholipase C, exotoxin A, rhamnolipid and pyocyanin relies on a cell-tocell communication system known as quorum sensing (van Delden & Iglewski, 1998; Winzer & Williams, 2001). These regulatory systems enable P. aeruginosa to produce virulence factors in a coordinated, cell-density-dependent manner. P. aeruginosa contains two separate quorum sensing systems, termed Las and Rhl (Latifi et al., 1996; Pearson et al., 1997). Each of these systems possesses a homoserine lactone synthase (LasI or RhlI, respectively), a regulator protein (LasR or RhlR, respectively) that modulates gene transcription, and their cognate activators, N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone (C12-HSL) and N-butanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL). Moreover, the P. aeruginosa genome encodes a type III secretion system (TTSS) similar to that found on the virulence plasmid 843

M. Hogardt and others

of Yersinia (Frank, 1997; Hueck, 1998). The TTSS of P. aeruginosa, also known as the exoenzyme S regulon, includes four secreted effectors: ExoS, ExoT, ExoU and ExoY. Exoenzyme S (ExoS) and exoenzyme T (ExoT) have ADP-ribosylating activity toward low-molecular-mass GTP-binding proteins of the Ras family (McGuffie et al., 1998). Exoenzyme Y (ExoY) is an adenylate cyclase whose activity is associated with profound morphological changes in epithelial cells (Yahr et al., 1998). Exoenzyme U (ExoU), which displays lipase activity in vitro (Sato et al., 2003), is responsible for the acute cytotoxity of P. aeruginosa toward epithelial cells (Finck-Barbancon et al., 1997) and macrophages (Hauser & Engel, 1999). Expression of these exoenzymes is primarily regulated by a transcriptional activator, ExsA, in response to various environmental signals, including low calcium and direct contact with tissue culture cells (Yahr & Frank, 1994; Yahr et al., 1995, 1996; Hornef et al., 2000). Despite this capacity to produce an arsenal of multiple exoproduct virulence determinants P. aeruginosa is able to grow in biofilms which also exist in the lungs of CF patients (Singh et al., 2000; Costerton, 2001). P. aeruginosa biofilms consist of bacterial communities embedded in an exopolysaccharide matrix. Interestingly, bacteria growing in biofilms possess characteristics distinct from their planktonic counterparts, including increased resistance against antimicrobial agents (Whiteley et al., 2001). Moreover, recent investigations have shown that gene expression differs remarkably during various stages of biofilm formation (Whiteley et al., 2001; Sauer et al., 2002) and that both the Las and the Rhl systems are differentially expressed (Davies et al., 1998; De Kievit et al., 2001). As the exoenzyme S regulon is triggered by eukaryotic cell contact, we assume that pseudomonads embedded in bacterial biofilms should not exhibit a remarkable activity of type III effectors, which primarily are used to provoke eukaryotic cell intoxication. If this is the case, this also would raise the question if quorum sensing signals (Las and Rhl systems), which are known to coordinate biofilm formation, are involved in the downregulation of the exoenzyme S regulon, in particular of the exoS gene. To examine this hypothesis, we initially determined ExoS production in P. aeruginosa biofilms and in mutants of the Las and Rhl quorum sensing systems. As green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter strategies are a valuable tool for determining the expression of type III-dependent effector proteins at the single-cell level, we used an exoS9-gfp translational reporter fusion (Jacobi et al., 1998; Hornef et al., 2000). Our experiments revealed that under inducing conditions for type III secretion the ExoS production in sessile P. aeruginosa cells growing in a biofilm is downregulated, but stimulated in planktonic bacteria. Moreover, we have demonstrated that ExoS production is upregulated in the rhlI mutant PDO100 and the rhlR mutant PDO111, whereas the lasI mutant showed no difference in exoS9-gfp expression compared to parent strain PAO1. As exoS9-gfp upregulation in PDO100 and PDO111 was growth-phase-dependent and most 844

notably during the stationary phase, we further tested exoS9-gfp expression in the rpoS mutant SS24. It has been reported that RpoS and the Rhl system are coordinately regulated (Latifi et al., 1996; Whiteley et al., 2000) and that RpoS is involved in biofilm formation (Xu et al., 2001; Heydorn et al., 2002). Indeed, we could show that in the rpoS mutant SS24 upregulation of exoS9-gfp was significant in comparison to strain PAO1. These data suggest a negative regulatory effect of the Rhl system and the stationaryphase sigma factor RpoS on exoS expression and possibly on the exoenzyme S regulon. In the following report we provide evidence that P. aeruginosa downregulates the exoS gene and possibly downregulates the exoenzyme S regulon during formation of biofilms.

METHODS Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions. All bacterial

strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Unless indicated otherwise, P. aeruginosa was routinely grown at 37 uC in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar plates. Standard methods were used for preparation of electrocompetent cells and for plasmid electroporation into P. aeruginosa (Smith & Iglewski, 1989). To study growth-phase-dependent exoS gene expression by flow cytometry, we used the recently described pExoS-gfp reporter plasmid. This plasmid carries a SacI–BamHI fragment from strain PAO1 comprising orf1 and 215 codons of the exoS gene ligated to gfp (exoS9-gfp reporter). Where required P. aeruginosa were grown under inducing conditions for type III secretion [tryptone soy broth supplemented with 10 mM nitrilotriacetic acid, 100 mM monosodium glutamate and 1 % glycerol, designated stimulation medium (SM); Yahr et al., 1997; Hornef et al., 2000]. To ensure stable carriage of plasmid pExoS-gfp, chloramphenicol (200 mg ml21) was incorporated into the growth medium. In supplementation experiments with exogenous N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs), P. aeruginosa strains were cultivated for 3 h in SM, harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in an equal volume of fresh SM supplemented with synthetic AHLs (from P. Williams, University of Nottingham). Where indicated, C12-HSL or C4-HSL was added to SM prior to inoculation, at concentrations of 4 and 5 mM, respectively. Bacterial cells were incubated for an additional 9 h and reexamined for ExoS9-GFP fluorescence by flow cytometry. Static biofilm experiments. For investigation of exoS9-gfp expression during biofilm formation, P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring plasmid pExoS-gfp was grown in SM-filled Petri dishes containing polypropylene slides (76626 mm) cut out from square Petri-dishes (Greiner Labourtechnik). An overnight culture grown in Vogel– Bonner (VB) medium (Vogel & Bonner, 2001) and diluted 1 : 100 in fresh stimulation medium was used as inoculum. Chloramphenicol (200 mg ml21) was added to the growth medium to ensure the stable carriage of plasmid pExoS-gfp. Slides with attached bacteria were removed at 24 h, washed extensively at least three times with sterile PBS and fixed with 3?7 % formalin for 30 min. After fixation slides were rinsed with sterile PBS and dried at room temperature. Staining was performed with 1 mg propidium iodide ml21 for 1 min to visualize attached bacteria. Planktonic bacteria growing in the supernatant were harvested in parallel, formalin-fixed and stained with propidium iodide. Images were obtained using a Leica Aristoplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with a standard filter set (Leica Microsystems) and a SPOT digital camera system (Diagnostic Instruments). Flow cytometric measurements of cell-density-dependent ExoS§-GFP production. Overnight cultures (VB medium) of

P. aeruginosa PAO1, PAO-JP1, PDO-100, PDO111 and SS24, Microbiology 150

Control of P. aeruginosa exoS expression

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study Strain or plasmid P. aeruginosa PAO1 (PAO1a) PAO1 (PAO1b) PAO-JP1 (lasI) PDO100 (rhlI) PDO111 (rhlR) SS24 (rpoS) PAO1(pExoS-gfp) PAO1(pExoU-gfp) PAO1(pKT-gfp) PAO-JP1(pExoS-gfp) PAO-JP1(pExoU-gfp) PDO100(pExoS-gfp) PDO100(pExoU-gfp) PDO111(pExoS-gfp) SS24(pExoS-gfp) SS24(pExoU-gfp) Plasmids pExoS-gfp pExoU-gfp

Description

Reference or source

Wild-type strain Wild-type strain lasI mutant derived from PAO1; Tcr rhlI mutant (rhlID : : Tn501-2) derived from PAO1, Hgr rhlR mutant derived from PAO1 rpoS mutant derived from PAO1 PAO1 with plasmid pExoS-gfp PAO1 with plasmid pExoU-gfp PAO1 with plasmid pKT-gfp PAO1-JP1 with plasmid pExoS-gfp PAO1-JP1 with plasmid pExoU-gfp PDO100 with plasmid pExoS-gfp PDO100 with plasmid pExoU-gfp PDO111 with plasmid pExoS-gfp SS24 with plasmid pExoS-gfp SS24 with plasmid pExoU-gfp

Suh et al. (1999) Pearson et al. (1997) Pearson et al. (1997) Brint & Ohman (1995) Brint & Ohman (1995) Suh et al. (1999) This study This study This study This study This study This study This study This study This study This study

pKT248 carrying the exoS9-gfp translational fusion pKT248 carrying the exoU9-gfp translational fusion

Hornef et al. (2000) Hornef et al. (2000)

harbouring plasmid pExoS-gfp, were diluted in fresh SM without chloramphenicol to an OD600 of 0?1 and were grown at 37 uC with shaking (200 r.p.m.). Samples were taken approximately every 2 h followed by determination of OD600. Prior to ExoS9-GFP measurement, bacterial cells were washed twice with PBS and finally resuspended in 1 ml PBS. P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring the control plasmid pKT-gfp (pKT248 carrying the gfp gene without the exoS promoter) was used as negative control (Hornef et al., 2000). A Coulter Epics flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) equipped with an argon 488 nm laser was used to measure the intensity of fluorescence of ExoS9-GFP-producing bacteria. In vitro stimulated bacteria were detected by side scatter as described by Russo-Marie et al. (1993). The intensity of fluorescence was determined and a gate was set corresponding to the bacterial population obtained from liquid culture. Fluorescence data and scatter data were collected for 50 000 events and mean fluorescence intensity was calculated. Flow cytometric results were verified by microscopy using a Leica Aristoplan epifluorescence microscope. Immunoblot analysis of ExoS§-GFP in bacterial cell lysates.

For analysis of ExoS9-GFP production via immunoblotting, pseudomonads were grown in SM to identical OD600 values of about 2?0, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in Laemmli electrophoresis buffer (Laemmli, 1970). The protein concentration of cell lysates was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Prior to electrophoresis, SDS, b-mercaptoethanol and bromophenol blue were added to about 10 mg protein, samples were boiled and were loaded onto SDS 12 % polyacrylamide gels and either stained with Coomassie brilliant blue or electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. Blotted ExoS9-GFP was detected with monoclonal rabbit anti-GFP (BD Biosciences) and visualized on immunoblots using enhanced chemoluminescence (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (see Fig. 4a). This experiment was performed on each of the strains PAO1, SS24, PAO-JP1 and PDO100 with plasmid pExoS-gfp to visualize ExoS9-GFP. RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis. Total RNA of

P. aeruginosa PAO1, SS24, PAO-JP1 and PDO100 (all lacking http://mic.sgmjournals.org

plasmid pExoS-gfp) was isolated with the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics). For Northern blots, RNA was isolated from stationary-phase cells (OD600 of about 2?0) grown in SM, separated in a denaturating formaldehyde gel and transferred to Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The exoS probe was generated by PCR using the primers exoS1 (59-ACCCTGACACCGGAAGGACT-39) and exoS2 (59-CATACCTTGGTCGATCAGCT-39) with chromosomal DNA of PAO1 as a template. The probe was labelled with UTP using PCR procedures. Hybridization and washings were performed using the DIG Easy Hyb System (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fragment sizes were estimated by comparison with the 0?3–6?9 kb RNA ladder from Roche Diagnostics (see Fig. 4b).

RESULTS Production of ExoS§-GFP in P. aeruginosa biofilms and in planktonic growing bacteria P. aeruginosa PAO1 harbouring the reporter plasmid pExoS-gfp was grown at 37 uC in SM-filled Petri dishes containing polypropylene slides until a subconfluent bacterial biofilm was formed on the slides. Chloramphenicol was added to the growth medium to ensure that bacteria did not lose plasmid pExoS-gfp. At about 18 h, sessile bacteria visualized by propidium iodide staining (Fig. 1a) were distributed over the slide, partly arranged as mushroom-like structures. Sessile bacteria growing in a biofilm and planktonic bacteria remaining in the broth supernatant were examined separately for ExoS9-GFP production. As shown in Fig. 1, sessile bacteria on the biofilm did not show GFP fluorescence (Fig. 1b), whereas planktonic bacteria emitted a bright green fluorescence, indicating expression of the exoS9-gfp reporter gene (Fig. 1d). Under inducing 845


Fig. 1. Propidium iodide-stained P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm attached to polypropylene slides (a). Planktonic bacteria growing in the supernatant (c). Synthesis of ExoS9-GFP translational fusion in sessile P. aeruginosa growing in a biofilm (b) in contrast to ExoS9-GFP expression in free-floating bacterial cells remaining in the broth supernatant (d) after incubation for 18 h in ExoS SM. Bars, 5 mm.

conditions for type III secretion, exoS9-gfp expression increased with time and the difference in ExoS9-GFP fluorescence between bacteria attached to polypropylene slides and suspended cells was most pronounced after 18–24 h (Fig. 1). Covering of polypropylene slides with fresh SM led to detachment of numerous bacteria, whereas adherent bacteria showed no GFP fluorescence. These results indicate that P. aeruginosa downregulates exoS during the formation of biofilms. Cell-density-dependent ExoS§-GFP synthesis in mutants of the P. aeruginosa Las and Rhl systems To examine whether the expression of exoS in P. aeruginosa is influenced by quorum sensing regulatory pathways, we electroporated pExoS-gfp into P. aeruginosa las and rhl mutants, respectively, and determined the intensity of fluorescence of ExoS9-GFP-producing bacteria in relation to cell density. The parental PAO1 strain harbouring the plasmid pKT-gfp was used as a negative control and showed virtually no fluorescence (Fig. 2). This indicates that there 846

was no cell-density-dependent gfp expression, possibly caused by other upstream-located promoters of the control plasmid. In contrast, P. aeruginosa PAO1 with plasmid pExoS-gfp showed a rise in GFP fluorescence per bacterial cell with increasing cell density. When compared to parental strain PAO1, the lasI mutant PAO-JP1 showed no difference in ExoS9-GFP fluorescence, whereas the rhlI mutant PDO100 exhibited a notable increase in exoS9-gfp expression, particularly in the late stationary growth phase (Fig. 2). These data suggest that in P. aeruginosa a regulatory link between exoS expression and Rhl-dependent quorum sensing pathways exists. In agreement with these results, the rhlR mutant PDO111 also exhibited increased ExoS9-GFP fluorescence compared to that of PAO1 (Fig. 2). Moreover, to corroborate the influence of the Rhl system on type III secretion we analysed the expression of the exoU9-gfp reporter in the quorum sensing mutant strains PDO100 and JP-1. As expected, at an OD600 of 1?5 we found a 2?6fold upregulation of ExoU9-GFP in strain PDO100 (rhlI) in comparison to PAO1, but not in strain JP1 (lasI) (data not shown). Microbiology 150


Fig. 2. Cell-density-dependent synthesis of the ExoS9-GFP translational fusion. Plasmid pExoS-gfp was introduced into strains PAO1, PDO100, PDO111 and PAO-JP1. PAO1 harbouring plasmid pKT-gfp was used as a negative control. The displayed values are the mean fluorescence intensity of 50 000 collected events corresponding to the bacterial population obtained from liquid culture and detected by side scatter. Type III-dependent ExoS secretion was stimulated in TSB supplemented with 0?01 M nitriloacetic acid, 0?1 M glutamic acid and 1 % glycerin. The data shown are the means of three different measured values. This experiment is representative and was performed at least twice for each strain.

ExoS§-GFP synthesis is upregulated in the rpoS mutant SS24 Previous studies reported that Rhl quorum sensing activates the expression of rpoS. RpoS, the stationary-phase sigma factor, originally identified in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, is responsible for the transcription of a variety of genes expressed after cells enter stationary phase or during starvation and stress conditions. Expression of rpoS increases during entry into stationary phase and was found to be elevated in P. aeruginosa biofilms (Xu et al., 2001). From this we hypothesized that RpoS might be involved in the negative regulation of exoS expression. To address this issue we measured the expression of the exoS9gfp reporter gene activity in the rpoS mutant SS24. Fig. 3 shows that strain SS24 exhibited a remarkable upregulation of exoS9-gfp in comparison to PAO1. In agreement with the data from the rhl mutants PDO100 and PDO111, the GFP fluorescence in SS24 was found to be dependent on cell density and reached its maximum during late stationary phase with approximately 2?5- and 5?0-fold higher GFP fluorescence at an OD600 of 2?0 than PDO100 and PAO1, respectively (Figs 2 and 3). To verify the flow cytometric results, ExoS9-GFP production and exoS mRNA of strains PAO-JP1, PDO100, SS24 and PAO1 were detected by immunoblotting with a monoclonal GFP-specific antibody and by Northern blotting with an exoS-specific probe, respectively. Fig. 4(a) shows the immunoblot of ExoS9GFP production of all the different strains. PAO1a (parent strain of rpoS mutant SS24) and PAO1b (parent strain of rhlI mutant PDO100) produced comparable amounts of ExoS9-GFP (only PAO1a is shown). In agreement with the cytofluorometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorter) analyses, PAO1-JP1 displayed no notable difference in ExoS9-GFP synthesis, whereas PDO100 and SS24 showed an increase in ExoS9-GFP production compared to PAO1. For exoS transcript analysis RNA was isolated from http://mic.sgmjournals.org

stationary-phase cells (all lacking plasmid pExoS-gfp), separated by a formaldehyde gel, transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with an exoS probe. In spite of some degradation of the RNA, this Northern blot analysis confirmed the increased transcription of exoS in strains PDO100 and SS24 (Fig. 4b). In summary, these data demonstrate that, especially in the stationary phase, exoS expression is downregulated by both the Rhl quorum sensing system and RpoS. Interestingly, in contrast to exoS9-gfp, we found no upregulation of the exoU9-gfp reporter in strain SS24, indicating that the exoS and the

Fig. 3. Cell-density-dependent ExoS9-GFP synthesis in strains PAO1 and SS24 analysed by flow cytometric analysis. PAO1 harbouring plasmid pKT-gfp was used as a negative control. 847


(a) 1

kDa

2

3

4

122 79 ExoS'-GFP 47 (b)

1

2

3

4

Fig. 4. (a) Western blot analysis of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (lane 1) and mutant strains SS24 (lane 2), PAO-JP1 (lane 3) and PDO100 (lane 4) using monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (all strains carrying pExoS-gfp). Each lane was loaded with 10 mg protein. The blot of whole-cell lysates was developed using enhanced chemiluminescence. The molecular mass standard is labelled on the left side of the figure. The relative mobility of ExoS9-GFP is indicated. (b) Northern blot analysis of exoS transcripts. RNA was isolated from strains PAO1 (lane 1), SS24 (lane 2), PAO-JP1 (lane 3) and PDO100 (lane 4) and harvested during stationary phase. RNA (1 mg) was separated in a denaturating formaldehyde gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane. The exoS structural gene was amplified using primers exoS1 and exoS2 and genomic DNA of PAO1 as template. The resulting PCR product was labelled with digoxigenin (DIG)-UTP and used as a probe for hybridization.

exoU genes are differentially regulated in the rpoS mutant (data not shown). Exogenously added C4-HSL reduced the exoS§-gfp upregulation in the rhlI mutant PDO100 to wild-type level The putative rhl-dependent downregulation of exoS expression was further confirmed by supplementation experiments with exogenous AHLs. Disruption of the autoinducer synthase gene, rhlI, abolished C4-HSL production. Therefore, we determined whether exoS9-gfp expression in PDO100 could be repressed by exogenously added C4-HSL. For this purpose, strains PAO1, PDO100 (rhlI) and PAO-JP1 (lasI) were grown in SM to mid-exponential phase and inoculated with fresh medium containing either 5 mM C4HSL or 4 mM C12-HSL. After 9 h incubation the GFP fluorescence intensity of PDO100 was found to be similar to that of PAO1 and PAO-JP1, indicating that addition of C4-HSL represses exoS9-gfp expression in the rhlI mutant as expected (Fig. 5a and b). In contrast, addition of C12-HSL had only a slight effect on exoS9-gfp expression of the rhlI mutant. As expected, neither the addition of C4-HSL nor of C12-HSL to PAO1-JP1 (lasI) led to a change in ExoS9-GFP production (Fig. 5c). Finally, we 848

Fig. 5. ExoS9-GFP production by parent strain PAO1 and mutants PDO100 (rhlI) and PAO1-JP1 (lasI), all harbouring plasmid pExoS-gfp in the absence of exogenously added AHLs and in the presence of 5 mM C4-HSL or 4 mM C12-HSL, respectively (indicated by arrow). Strains were grown for 3 h in SM prior to inoculation with AHLs (t=0). Bacterial cells were incubated for an additional 9 h and re-examined for ExoS expression by flow cytometry. The results represent the means of three different measured values and were performed three times for each strain. Microbiology 150


could demonstrate that addition of C4-HSL to the liquid culture of rpoS mutant SS24 did not change the expression of the exoS9-gfp reporter (data not shown), suggesting that RpoS is downstream of the Rhl-RpoS-ExoS regulatory cascade. In summary, these data provide further evidence that, especially in stationary phase, exoS expression is negatively regulated by Rhl quorum sensing and RpoS.

DISCUSSION The major sets of secreted pathogenicity factors of P. aeruginosa can be divided into two groups. One group includes the exotoxin ExoA and diverse degrading enzymes such as proteases and lipases, which are released into the environment by the type II protein secretion system Xcp. The expression of the Xcp machinery and the cognate substrates are positively regulated by autoinducer systems (Gambello et al., 1993; Chapon-Herve et al., 1997). The second group of secreted pathogenicity factors comprises cellular modulins such as the exotoxins ExoS, T, U and Y, which are secreted and translocated into host cells through an ‘injection needle’ of the TTSS (Psc apparatus), known as the exoenzyme S regulon. Presumably, secreted proteases (e.g. LasA and LasB) impair the surface-exposed portion of the Psc apparatus and, therefore, it appears reasonable that the Xcp and the Psc systems should be coordinately, possibly reciprocally regulated. In this work, we focussed on the regulatory cascade linking quorum sensing and RpoS with the exoS gene, a representative of the exoenzyme S regulon. We have taken advantage of the exoS9-gfp reporter translational fusion to determine regulation of the exoS gene at the single-cell level, which allowed direct monitoring of differential expression in planktonic and sessile bacteria. As a first approach we have demonstrated that exoS9-gfp is downregulated when P. aeruginosa forms biofilms (Fig. 1). This appears to be reasonable, because Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms covering solid substrates do not require a sophisticated TTSS protein injection apparatus to be directed against phagocytic cells. Biofilm formation and autoinducer production has been demonstrated for P. aeruginosa colonizing the respiratory tract of CF patients (Erickson et al., 2002; Favre-Bonte et al., 2002). In this case exoenzyme S might not be required to protect P. aeruginosa against the cellular host defences (Frank, 1997) because the microbes are organized as alginate-embedded microcolonies and thus are sufficiently protected. Next we studied the involvement of the autoinducer system in regulation of exoS expression by exoS9-gfp measurement. Starting with the late-exponential growth phase (Fig. 2), ExoS9-GFP fluorescence increased significantly in the rhlI and rhlR mutants. These results were confirmed by adding C4-HSL (the cognate autoinducer of RhlR) to the liquid culture of the rhlI mutant which led to an ExoS9-GFP level comparable to that of parental strain PAO1 (C4-HSLproducer). Due to the Las/Rhl hierarchical relationship we would also expect upregulation of exoS9-gfp in the lasI http://mic.sgmjournals.org

mutant in comparison to the parent strain PAO1. However, this could not be demonstrated, which underlines the complexity of cross-regulation between the Las/Rhl system and several other regulators such as the quorum sensing controlled repressor QscR and the recently reported heterodimerization between QscR and LasR and RhlR in the absence of AHLs (Ledgham et al., 2003). Furthermore, we checked the transcription of exoS (Northern blotting) and the production of ExoS9-GFP (immunoblotting) of the lasI mutant PAO-JP1, the rhlI mutant PDO100, the rpoS mutant SS24 and PAO1 (Fig. 4), and can confirm the results obtained with the exoS9-gfp reporter. In conclusion, we have no clear results with lasI or rhlI mutants which allows interpretation in terms of the hirarchical organization of the quorum sensing regulatory cascade. However, the results obtained from rhlI and rhlR mutants were consistent, suggesting that the Rhl system regulates the expression of the exoS gene. This finding was strengthened by the analysis of the exoU9-gfp reporter, which was upregulated in the rhlI mutant as well. Moreover, we have demonstrated that the sigma factor RpoS may also be involved in exoS regulation, although there are conflicting results with respect to the link between rpoS and RhlR/C4HSL (Latifi et al., 1996; Whiteley et al., 2000). Although the negative regulatory effect of RpoS on ExoS9-GFP expression was not found for ExoU9-GFP, our results have clearly shown a significant upregulation of the exoS9-gfp reporter fusion (Fig. 3) and the exoS gene (Northern blot, Fig. 4b) when RpoS is lacking. The difference in the expression of ExoS9-GFP and ExoU9-GFP in strain SS24 implies that exoS and exoU, which do not naturally coexist in the P. aeruginosa chromosome and which represent an ADPribosyltransferase and a lipase, respectively, are differentially regulated. However, there are no data which could explain a direct repressive effect of RpoS on exoS transcription. Alternatively, it is also conceivable that RpoS induces the expression of a transcriptional repressor acting on the exoenzyme S regulon. It is known that exoS is upregulated by the transcriptional activator ExsA which is suggested to bind upstream of the exoS promoter. Moreover, ExsD functions as negative regulator or antiactivator of additional TTSS genes by interaction with ExsA (McCaw et al., 2002). Unfortunately, nothing is known about dissociation conditions of ExsD/ExsA heterodimers. Recently, it was shown that the cAMP-binding protein Vfr, which also acts on the transcriptional control of the Las system (Albus et al., 1997), positively regulates the P. aeruginosa TTSS, including effector genes, genes of the Psc apparatus, and the regulatory exsC-exsA and exsD-pscL operons (Wolfgang et al., 2003). In summary, Vfr and ExsA are central regulators of TTSS in P. aeruginosa. Interestingly, in E. coli and probably in P. aeruginosa Vfr is involved in RpoS repression (Venturi, 2003; Bertani et al., 2003), possibly counteracting RpoS-dependent downregulation of exoS expression. Moreover, microarray experiments have revealed that both exsC (PA1710) and exsB (PA1712) (which regulates type III-dependent ExoS secretion) are 849


downregulated in P. aeruginosa biofilms (Whiteley et al., 2001; Wagner et al., 2003). These data fit well with the downregulation of exoS shown in this study. In contrast to P. aeruginosa TTSS, the TTSS of the LEE pathogenicity island of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) has been described as being upregulated by the quorum sensing regulator QseA which activates the LEE-encoded regulator Ler, and thus LEE operons (Sperandio et al., 1999, 2002a, b). In these cases EPEC and EHEC do not form typical biofilms or microcolonies, but rather form a monolayer on the surface of mucosal epithelial cells and the LEE operons which may be triggered by AHLs produced by gut bacteria. Thus, the infection strategy of these enteric E. coli is completely different from Pseudomonas. In conclusion, our data have shown that in P. aeruginosa the Rhl system and RpoS exhibit an inhibitory effect (directly or indirectly) on exoS expression and are probably embedded in a complex regulatory pathway which controls the action of the type III secretion machinery of P. aeruginosa. Further studies are currently underway to analyse the role of RpoS on exsD and vfr regulation and the trigger mechanism for ExsA activation to elucidate the regulatory link between quorum sensing and TTSS.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by a grant of the Mu¨nchner Medizinische Wochenschrift. We thank P. Williams for the generous gift of synthetic AHLs.

REFERENCES Albus, A. M., Pesci, E. C., Runyen-Janecky, L. J., West, S. E. & Iglewski, B. H. (1997). Vfr controls quorum sensing in Pseudomonas

Erickson, D. L., Endersby, R., Kirkham, A., Stuber, K., Vollman, D. D., Rabin, H. R., Mitchell, I. & Storey, D. G. (2002). Pseudomonas

aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems may control virulence factor expression in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun 70, 1783–1790. Favre-Bonte, S., Pache, J. C., Robert, J., Blanc, D., Pechere, J. C. & van Delden, C. (2002). Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-

cell signals in lung tissue of cystic fibrosis patients. Microb Pathog 32, 143–147. Finck-Barbancon, V., Goranson, J., Zhu, L., Sawa, T., WienerKronish, J. P., Fleiszig, S. M., Wu, C., Mende-Mueller, L. & Frank, D. W. (1997). ExoU expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa correlates

with acute cytotoxicity and epithelial injury. Mol Microbiol 25, 547–557. Frank, D. W. (1997). The exoenzyme S regulon of Pseudomonas

aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 26, 621–629. Gambello, M. J., Kaye, S. & Iglewski, B. H. (1993). LasR of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a transcriptional activator of the alkaline protease gene (apr) and an enhancer of exotoxin A expression. Infect Immun 61, 1180–1184. Hauser, A. R. & Engel, J. N. (1999). Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces

type-III-secretion-mediated apoptosis of macrophages and epithelial cells. Infect Immun 67, 5530–5537. Heydorn, A., Ersboll, B., Kato, J., Hentzer, M., Parsek, M. R., TolkerNielsen, T., Givskov, M. & Molin, S. (2002). Statistical analysis of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development: impact of mutations in genes involved in twitching motility, cell-to-cell signaling, and stationary-phase sigma factor expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 2008–2017. Hornef, M. W., Roggenkamp, A., Geiger, A. M., Hogardt, M., Jacobi, C. A. & Heesemann, J. (2000). Triggering the ExoS regulon of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a GFP-reporter analysis of exoenzyme (Exo) S, ExoT and ExoU synthesis. Microb Pathog 29, 329–343. Hueck, C. J. (1998). Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial

pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 379–433. Jacobi, C. A., Roggenkamp, A., Rakin, A., Zumbihl, R., Leitritz, L. & Heesemann, J. (1998). In vitro and in vivo expression studies of yopE

from Yersinia enterocolitica using the gfp reporter gene. Mol Microbiol 30, 865–882. Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the

aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 179, 3928–3935.

assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.

Bertani, I., Sevo, M., Kojic, M. & Venturi, V. (2003). Role of GacA,

Latifi, A., Foglino, M., Tanaka, K., Williams, P. & Lazdunski, A. (1996). A hierarchical quorum-sensing cascade in Pseudomonas

LasI, RhlI, Ppk, PsrA, Vfr and ClpXP in the regulation of the stationary-phase sigma factor rpoS/RpoS in Pseudomonas. Arch Microbiol 180, 264–271. Brint, J. M. & Ohman, D. E. (1995). Synthesis of multiple exoproducts

in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is under the control of RhlR-RhlI, another set of regulators in strain PAO1 with homology to the autoinducerresponsive LuxR-LuxI family. J Bacteriol 177, 7155–7163.

aeruginosa links the transcriptional activators LasR and RhIR (VsmR) to expression of the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS. Mol Microbiol 21, 1137–1146. Ledgham, F., Ventre, I., Soscia, C., Foglino, M., Sturgis, J. N. & Lazdunski, A. (2003). Interactions of the quorum sensing regulator

QscR: interaction with itself and the other regulators of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasR and RhlR. Mol Microbiol 48, 199–210.

Chapon-Herve, V., Akrim, M., Latifi, A., Williams, P., Lazdunski, A. & Bally, M. (1997). Regulation of the xcp secretion pathway by

McCaw, M. L., Lykken, G. L., Singh, P. K. & Yahr, T. L. (2002).

multiple quorum-sensing modulons in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 24, 1169–1178.

ExsD is a negative regulator of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion regulon. Mol Microbiol 46, 1123–1133.

Costerton, J. W. (2001). Cystic fibrosis pathogenesis and the role of

McGuffie, E. M., Frank, D. W., Vincent, T. S. & Olson, J. C. (1998).

biofilms in persistent infection. Trends Microbiol 9, 50–52.

Modification of Ras in eukaryotic cells by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S. Infect Immun 66, 2607–2613.

Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W. & Greenberg, E. P. (1998). The involvement of

cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280, 295–298. De Kievit, T. R., Gillis, R., Marx, S., Brown, C. & Iglewski, B. H. (2001). Quorum-sensing genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms:

their role and expression patterns. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 1865–1873. 850

Pearson, J. P., Pesci, E. C. & Iglewski, B. H. (1997). Roles of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J Bacteriol 179, 5756–5767. Russo-Marie, F., Roederer, M., Sager, B., Herzenberg, L. A. & Kaiser, D. (1993). Beta-galactosidase activity in single differentiating

bacterial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90, 8194–8198. Microbiology 150

Control of P. aeruginosa exoS expression Sato, H., Frank, D. W., Hillard, C. J. & 9 other authors (2003). The

mechanism of action of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa-encoded type III cytotoxin, ExoU. EMBO 22, 2959–2969. Sauer, K., Camper, A. K., Ehrlich, G. D., Costerton, J. W. & Davies, D. G. (2002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes

during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184, 1140–1154. Singh, P. K., Schaefer, A. L., Parsek, M. R., Moninger, T. O., Welsh, M. J. & Greenberg, E. P. (2000). Quorum-sensing signals indicate

that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms. Nature 407, 762–764.

Wagner, V. E., Bushnell, D., Passador, L., Brooks, A. I. & Iglewski, B. H. (2003). Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas

aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulons: effects of growth phase and environment. J Bacteriol 185, 2080–2095. Whiteley, M., Parsek, M. R. & Greenberg, E. P. (2000). Regulation of

quorum sensing by RpoS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 182, 4356–4360. Whiteley, M., Bangera, M. G., Bumgarner, R. E., Parsek, M. R., Teitzel, G. M., Lory, S. & Greenberg, E. P. (2001). Gene expression in

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 413, 860–864.

Smith, A. W. & Iglewski, B. H. (1989). Transformation of Pseudo-

Winzer, K. & Williams, P. (2001). Quorum sensing and the regulation

monas aeruginosa by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 10509.

of virulence gene expression in pathogenic bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol 291, 131–143.

Sperandio, V., Mellies, J. L., Nguyen, W., Shin, S. & Kaper, J. B. (1999). Quorum sensing controls expression of the type III secretion

gene transcription and protein secretion in enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 15196–15201. Sperandio, V., Li, C. C. & Kaper, J. B. (2002a). Quorum-sensing

Wolfgang, M. C., Lee, V. T., Gilmore, M. E. & Lory, S. (2003).

Coordinate regulation of bacterial virulence genes by a novel adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling pathway. Dev Cell 4, 253–263. Xu, K. D., Franklin, M. J., Park, C. H., McFeters, G. A. & Stewart, P. S. (2001). Gene expression and protein levels of the stationary phase

Escherichia coli regulator A: a regulator of the LysR family involved in the regulation of the locus of enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island in enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Infect Immun 70, 3085–3093.

sigma factor, RpoS, in continuously-fed Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 199, 67–71.

Sperandio, V., Torres, A. G. & Kaper, J. B. (2002b). Quorum sensing

trans-regulatory locus which controls exoenzyme S synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 176, 3832–3838.

Escherichia coli regulators B and C (QseBC): a novel two-component regulatory system involved in the regulation of flagella and motility by quorum sensing in E. coli. Mol Microbiol 43, 809–821. Suh, S. J., Silo-Suh, L., Woods, D. E., Hassett, D. J., West, S. E. & Ohman, D. E. (1999). Effect of rpoS mutation on the stress response

and expression of virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 181, 3890–3897. van Delden, C. & Iglewski, B. H. (1998). Cell-to-cell signaling and

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis 4, 551–560. Venturi, V. (2003). Control of rpoS transcription in Escherichia coli and pseudomonas: why so different? Mol Microbiol 49, 1–9.

Yahr, T. L. & Frank, D. W. (1994). Transcriptional organization of the

Yahr, T. L., Hovey, A. K., Kulich, S. M. & Frank, D. W. (1995).

Transcriptional analysis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S structural gene. J Bacteriol 177, 1169–1178. Yahr, T. L., Goranson, J. & Frank, D. W. (1996). Exoenzyme S of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is secreted by a type III pathway. Mol Microbiol 22, 991–1003. Yahr, T. L., Mende-Mueller, L. M., Friese, M. B. & Frank, D. W. (1997). Identification of type III secreted products of the Pseudo-

monas aeruginosa exoenzyme S regulon. J Bacteriol 179, 7165–7168.

Vogel, H. & Bonner, D. M. (2001). Acetylornithinase of Escherichia

Yahr, T. L., Vallis, A. J., Hancock, M. K., Barbieri, J. T. & Frank, D. W. (1998). ExoY, an adenylate cyclase secreted by the Pseudomonas

coli, partial purification and properties. J Biol Chem 218, 97–106.

aeruginosa type III system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 13899–13904.

http://mic.sgmjournals.org

851