Fecundity, egg weight and longevity in relation to ... - Springer Link

2 downloads 0 Views 455KB Size Report
to multiple matings in females of the monarch butterfly. L. Sv~ird and C. Wiklund. Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1988) 23:39-43

9 Springer-Verlag 1988

Fecundity, egg weight and longevity in relation to multiple matings in females of the monarch butterfly L. Sv~ird and C. Wiklund Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Received December 2, 1987/Accepted March 10, 1988

Summary. In many insects nutrients transferred by the male at mating are later incorporated into both the eggs and soma of the mated females. Accordingly, it has been suggested that insect females can use these male-derived nutrients for somatic maintenance and enhancement of their fecundity and fitness of their offspring. In this paper we tested the validity of these predictions by studying the longevity and reproductive output of 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 times mated female monarchs Danaus plexippus, a nectar-feeding butterfly that is long-lived and strongly polyandrous and emerges as an adult without mature eggs. Females mated five times received ejaculates that corresponded to an average of 38% of their body weight at eclosion. However, we found that the number of times females had mated had no effect on their longevity, life-time fecundity, or egg weight. Although negative evidence should always be interpreted with caution, our study suggests that male-derived nutrients are less important for female longevity and reproductive output than are larval and adult food.

Introduction

In many insects ejaculate nutrients transferred by the male at mating are later incorporated in both the eggs and soma of the mated females (Friedel and Gillott 1977; Boggs and Gilbert 1979; Boggs 1981 a; Boggs and Watt 1981 ; Bowen et al. 1984). Accordingly, it has been suggested that insect females can use male-derived nutrients for somatic maintenance and enhancement of their fecundity and fitness of their offspring (Thornhill and Alcock 1983; Gwynne 1984a; Rutowski 1984; Simmons 1988). However, although females have the physiological opportunity to use these nutrients, it has proven exceedingly difficult to demonstrate any

positive effect of them on female longevity or fecundity (Walker 1980; Greenfield 1982; Gwynne et al. 1984; Jones et al. 1986). Resources allocated to reproduction by females can also be derived from larval and adult feeding (Labine 1968; Boggs 1981b). The difficulty in demonstrating an effect of male-derived nutrients is thus understandable if they contribute less to female longevity and fecundity than do larval and adult feeding. This line of reasoning is supported by the observation that a positive effect of male-derived nutrients on female egglaying rate in two orthopterans was visible only when females were maintained on a restricted or low-quality diet (Gwynne 1984b; Gwynne et al. 1984; Butlin et al. 1987; Simmons, 1988). Male-derived nutrients could be especially important for female survivorship and fecundity in long-lived species in which eggs mature relatively late (after mating) and in which adult feeding contributes little to reproductive output of females, as in nectar-feeding insects (Boggs and Gilbert 1979; Boggs 1981 a, b; Gwynne 1984 b). Moreover, the potential importance of male-derived nutrients should correlate positively with the size of the male ejaculate and the degree of female polyandry. The monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus has been suggested as a suitable candidate for investigating the possible role of male-derived nutrients in female reproductive output and survivorship (Gwynne 1984a). In the monarch females corporate male-derived nutrients in their soma and eggs (Boggs and Gilbert 1979); females eclose without mature eggs in their abdomen (Urquhart 1960; Barker and Herman 1976; Zalucki 1981); it is a long-lived species by butterfly standards (Urquhart 1960; Munger and Harriss 1969); and adults feed exclusively on nectar (Boggs and Gilbert 1979). Sv/ird and Wiklund (in press) report that ejaculate weights transferred by previously unmated males make up an average of 7.5% of female body

40

weight, and Pliske (1973) reported that females mate up to eight times, old females having an average of between four and five spermatophores in their bursa. In this laboratory study we investigated the possible influence of male ejaculates on female lifetime fecundity, egg weight, and survivorship by comparing the values of these parameters for females allowed to mate between one and five times.

Methods The experiments were performed in April and May and in October and November 1986. Pupae of Danaus plexippus were flown in from Florida and kept at approximately 25~ and a 16 h light : 8 h dark cycle. After eclosion, the butterflies were individually marked and weighed on a Sauter A R 1014 automatic electrobalance and put in a 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.5 m flight cage. The butterflies were given a 25% sucrose solution every day and were kept in the flight cage until mating took place between four and ten days after eclosion from the pupa. By means of a lottery procedure females were assigned to one of five groups in which females were allowed to mate 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 times. The number of females in each group were 11, 5, 5, 4, and 5, respectively. Immediately after the first mating, females were transferred together with a potted Asclepias curassavica, one of their natural host plants, to egglaying cages measuring 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 m. As previously, the females were fed every day. Dixon et al. (1978) reported that in their experiments the majority of monarch egglaying occurred between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. ; therefore, we maintained a 6 h light: 18 h dark cycle for egglaying females in order to give females ample time for ovipositing. The temperature was kept at 25 ~ C during the dark period and 28~ ~ C during the photophase. Remating of females always took place after the end of the 6 h egglaying period, and all copulations ended before the start of the next photophase. Thus females were never hindered in their egglaying because of copulation time overlapping egglaying time. Females were remated at 3-4 day intervals, and all rematings occurred 4-14 days after the first mating (cf. Fig. 1), in an attempt to imitate the timing of rematings in natural populations of the monarch as indicated by Pliske (1973). Throughout the lives of all 31 females, eggs laid by each individual female were removed, counted, and weighed daily on a Cahn 28 Automatic electrobalance. After weighing, the eggs were kept in 5 ml plastic capsules for a week and egg fertility was assessed by counting the number of larvae hatched from the laid eggs. Males used for rematings were always allowed a three-day period of rest between matings after which they produced ejaculates as large as those delivered by unmated males (Svfird and Wiklund (unpublished). Since we wanted to study the possible influence of malederived nutrients on female survivorship, the longevity of females was measured from the day of their first mating.

Results

The number of matings and the weight of the female had no significant effect on female lifetime

Table 1 a-c. Multiple regression of number of matings and fe-

male weight on: a) female life-time fecundity, b) mean egg weight, c) female longevity. Significance was tested by analysis of variance Variable

Coefficient

SE

Significance level

343.841 0.706 29.217

0.123 0.837 0.550

0.045 0.000 0.004

0.000 0.615 0.937

10.176 0.021 0.865

0.001 0.317 0.853

a) female life-time fecundity Constant Female weight Number of matings n=31 Overall F = 0.227 R z =0.016

547.029 0.147 17.700 P = 0.789

b) mean egg weight Constant Female weight Number of matings n:31 Overall F = 0.140 R 2 =0.010

0.376 0.000 0.000 P = 0.869

c) female longevity Constant Female weight Number of matings n-31 Overall F = 0.520 RZ=0.036

38.201 -0.021 0.162 P = 0.600

fecundity, mean egg weight, or female longevity (Table 1). We also did not find any short-term effect of male secretion when daily egg production, daily egg mass production and mean daily egg weight were examined (Fig. 1; t-test P > 0 . 0 5 for all of the three parameters throughout all of the 16 days analyzed). These parameters were compared for females mated once and females mated more than once. One multiple-mated female that died before the 16th day was omitted from this test. Monarch females laid an average of 663 +_42 eggs (mean • SE) and lived 28 +_ 1 days after mating for the first time. The mean egg weight was 0.399+0.005 mg and egg fertility was close to 100% for all females throughout the egglaying period. Discussion

The hypothesis that male-contributed nutrients can be used by females to increase their reproductive output has been tested previously in four lepidopterans by analyzing the number of eggs laid by females that had all mated once but had received ejaculates of different sizes. In these studies material passed to the females at mating varied

41

E

40

X3 O

30

l -...... i.

l

~ 2o cn

9~

10

D

t c o

75

',, ........; -,.../ l

~ 50

o

25

19

o. Z: 0,40

11

19

Ill

!,

i

/

i !,'9 T 9!;;;!\ ...'"

~

o 0.36

11

11

t

t

%

f

t

,, 1'6

Days since first mating

Fig. 1. Daily reproductive performance of 11 females mated once, and another group of females mated 2, 3, 4, or 5 times. Vertical lines above or below each point indicate the standard error. The number above or below each point indicates the sample size. Rematings are indicated by arrows. The sample size in the remating group decreases with time since 19 females were mated twice; out of these 19, 14 were mated three times; out of the 14, 9 were mated four times; out of the 9, 5 were mated five times ( e . . . 9 ~ mated once, 9 1 4 9 ~ mated more than once)

by a factor of not more than two. In Colias eyrytheme female fecundity correlated positively with the size of the ejaculate they had received (Rutowski et al. 1987), but in Plodia interpunctella, Euphydryas editha, and E. chalcedona male-contributed nutrients had no discernible effect on female fecundity or on egg fertility (Greenfield 1982; Jones et al. 1986). In the present study we increased the variance in the amount of materials transferred to the females at mating by allowing one group of females to mate repeatedly while another group

of females was allowed to mate only once. Since the female monarchs in our study weighed an average of 486 mg and male ejaculates weighed an average of 37 mg (Sv/ird and Wiklund, in press), females that mated five times received a male contribution corresponding to 38% of their body weight at eclosion, whereas females that mated only once received an ejaculate corresponding to 7.5% of their body weight. (By comparison, in the seven butterfly species for which data were given by Rutowski et al. 1983, females received on an average ejaculates corresponding to only 4.9% of their body weight.) However, in spite of the large amount of ejaculate received by multiple mated females and the fact that Boggs and Gilbert (1979) have shown that male-derived nutrients are rapidly incorporated into both the female eggs and soma of the monarch, we found no short- or long-term effect of male-derived nutrients on female fecundity, reproductive output, or egg fertility. Male-derived nutrients have been shown to increase female reproductive output in three orthopterans : Requena verticalis (Gwynne 1984b), Chorthippus brunneus (Butlin et al. 1987), and Gryllus bimaculatus (Simmons 1988), but the effect is only discernible if females are maintained on a restricted or low quality diet. Even though we agree with Jones et al. (1986) that more studies must be conducted before safe generalizations can be made, the studies performed to date on both orthopterans and lepidopterans suggest that the reproductive output by females in benign environments is not increased by malederived nutrients, whereas that of females in harsh environments may be. In the Lepidoptera, females (and males) generally feed on a more protein-rich food in the larval stage than in the adult stage (Labine 1968; Dunlap-Pianka et al. 1977; DunlapPianka 1979; Boggs 1981 b), and therefore female reproductive output should be strongly dependent on the resources accumulated in the larval stage. In contrast, the food of adult orthopterans is as protein-rich as that of the larvae; (the spermatophylax that is delivered by the male at mating along with the sperm ampulla is consumed as any other morsel of food). Because adequate nutrients for egg production are probably limited in many lepidopterans, Gwynne (1984 a) argued t h a t " longlived species of Lepidoptera with multiple-mating females are thus the most likely candidates for increased male nutrient investment". However, the fact that females of four out of five investigated species of Lepidoptera do not use male-derived nutrients to increase their reproductive output sug-

42

gests that lepidopteran females should not be regarded as equivalent to undernourished orthopterans. Furthermore, the composition of lepidopteran spermatophores, about 85% water and only about 7% protein (Boggs 1981 a), make their nutritional contribution even less likely. At the present time we feel that the possible role of male investment in female fecundity and longevity is uncertain; therefore, the question remains why males produce these copious secretions. Our explanation is that males of polyandrous species produce large ejaculates in order to cope with the high degree of male competition in those species (Sv/ird 1985; Sv/ird and Wiklund, unpublished). The rationale for this is as follows: Since there is a high degree of sperm displacement in butterflies, it would be to the male's advantage if he could prevent or delay further matings by the female, thereby increasing the number of eggs being fertilized by his sperm. A larger size of the ejaculate may mechanically prevent other males from being able to inseminate females. In addition, the size of the ejaculate has a positive influence on the time period females are unwilling to remate (Sugawara 1979). Another question that arises, if male investment lacks importance for female fecundity or longevity, is why females mate more than once. Walker (1980) and Drummond (1984) give several alternative reasons why females may benefit from polyandry: (1) to achieve an adequate sperm supply, (2) to increase genetic diversity of offspring, or (3) to minimize loss of time and energy required to resist insistent males. In view of the high fertility of eggs in our study, there is little that indicates monarch females need to replenish sperm supply. The second hypothesis is more or less untestable. In reference to (3), evidence indicates that male butterflies transfer antiaphrodisiacs to females at mating (Gilbert 1976; Wiklund and Forsberg 1985), and since courtship by male monarchs appears brutal (Pliske 1975; Rothschild 1978), receiving antiaphrodisiacs through repeated matings might be beneficial to female monarchs. However, since male monarchs can enforce copulation on females (Pliske 1975; Rothschild 1978), this could be a satisfactory explanation for the high degree of polyandry observed in wild monarch butterflies.

References Barker JF, Herman WS (1976) Effect of photoperiod and temperature on reproduction of the monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus. J Insect Physiol 22:1565-1568

Boggs CL (1981 a) Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investment at mating in Heliconiine butterflies. Evolution 35 : 931-940 Boggs CL (1981b) Nutritional and life-history determinants of resource allocation in holometabolus insects. Am Nat 117: 692-709 Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies : evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206: 83-84 Boggs CL, Watt WB (1981) Population structure of pierid butterflies. IV. Genetic and physiological investment in offspring by male Colias. Oecologia 50: 3213~324 Bowen BJ, Codd CG, Gwynne DT (1984) The katydid spermatophore (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae): Male nutritional investment and its fate in the mated female. Aust J Zool 32: 23-31 Butlin RK, Woodhatch CW, Hewitt G M (1987) Male spermatophore investment increases female fecundity in a grasshopper. Evolution 41 : 221-225 Dixon CA, Erickson JM, Keller DN, Rothschild M (1978) Some adaptations between Danaus plexippus and its food plant, with notes on Danaus chrysippus and Eploea core (Insecta: Lepidoptera). J Zool 185:437-467 Drummond BC (1984) Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York Dunlap-Pianka HL (1979) Ovarian dynamics in Heliconius butterflies: correlations among daily oviposition rates, egg weights, and quantitative aspects of oogenesis. J Insect Physiol 25 : 741-749 Dunlap-Pianka HL, Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1977) Ovarian dynamics in Heliconiine butterflies: Programmed senescence versus eternal youth. Science 197 : 487-490 Friedel T, Gillott C (1977) Contribution of male-produce proteins to vitellogenesis in Melanoplus sanguipes. J Insect Physiol 23:145-151 Gilbert LE (1976) Postmating female odor in Heliconius butterflies: a male-contributed antiaphrodisiac. Science 193:419-420 Greenfield MD (1982) The question of paternal investment in Lepidoptera: male-contributed proteins in Plodia interpunctella. Int J Invert Reproduc 5 : 323-330 Gwynne DT (1984a) Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York Gwynne DT (1984b) Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307 : 361-363 Gwynne DT, Bowen B J, Codd CG (1984) The function of the katydid spermatophore and its role in fecundity and insemination (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae). Aust J Zool 32:15-22 Jones KN, Odendaal FJ, Erlich PR (1986) Evidence against the spermatophore as paternal investment in the checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas: Nymphalidae). Am Midl Nat 116:1-6 Labine PA (1968) The population biology of the butterfly Euphydryas editha. VIII. Oviposition and its relation to patterns of oviposition in other butterflies. Evolution 22: 799-805 Munger F, Harriss TT (1969) Laboratory production of the monarch butterfly Danausplexippus. J Res Lepid 8 : 16%176 Pliske TE (1973) Factors determining mating frequencies in some New World butterflies and skippers. Ann Ent Soc Amer 66:164~169 Pliske TE (1975) Courtship behaviour of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus. Ann Ent Soc Amer 68:143 151

43 Rothschild M (1978) Hell's angels. Antenna 2:38-39 Rutowski RL (1984) Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating behavior. J Res Lepid 23:125-142 Rutowski RL, Newton M, Schaefer J (1983) Interspecific variation in the size of the nutrient investment made by male butterflies during copulation. Evolution 37:708-713 Rutowski RL, Gilchrist GW, Terkanian B (1987) Female butterflies mated with recently mated males show reduced reproductive output. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20 : 319322 Simmons LW (1988) The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus birnaculatus). Ecol Entomol (in press) Sugawara Y (1979) Mating frequency in females of the small cabbage white, Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Kontyu 47:335-339

Svfird L (1985) Paternal investment in a monandrous butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oikos 45:66-70 Svfird L, Wiklund C (1988) Prolonged mating in the monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus, and nightfall as a cue for sperm transfer. Oikos 51:351-354 Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Urquhart FA (1960) The monarch butterfly. University of Toronto Press, Toronto Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115 : 780-799 Wiklund C, Forsberg J (1985) Courtship and male discrimination between virgin and mated females in the Orange Tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines. Anim Behav 34:328-332 Zalucki MP (1981) The effect of age and weather on egg laying in Danaus plexippus L. (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Res Popul Ecol 23:318-327