Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN: 1025-5842 (Print) 1476-8259 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gcmb20
Finite element model and ergonomic pertinent choice for stirrup sensors location D. Prin-Conti, W. Bertucci & K. Debray To cite this article: D. Prin-Conti, W. Bertucci & K. Debray (2017) Finite element model and ergonomic pertinent choice for stirrup sensors location, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 20:sup1, 163-164, DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1382913 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1382913
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 27 Oct 2017.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 57
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=gcmb20
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2017 VOL. 20, NO. S1, S163–S164 https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1382913
OPEN ACCESS
Finite element model and ergonomic pertinent choice for stirrup sensors location D. Prin-Conti, W. Bertucci and K. Debray GRESPI, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne KEYWORDS Stirrup; ergonomic; location; strain gauge
1. Introduction The scope of this paper is to export our results to create a device able to quantify the forces applied on the stirrups. The subject is to determine the ergonomic and pertinent choice for sensor location. French research in equine sports performance publishes articles that present significant results, such as the 43rd Equine Research Days organized by IFCE in partnership with ‘The French Equine School’. We haven’t found any scientific paper that has validated the proposed experimental methodology. Some experimental results only used sensor to determine the specificity of the stirrup sensor without any valid test (Cosson 2012; Van Beek et al. 2012; Martin et al. 2016; Biau 2017). The difficult is to discover the strain and the real frictions applied on the different parts of the stirrups fasteners.
2. Methods 2.1. Simulation To obtain the ideal strain gauge location, we realized a finite element model to calculate longitudinal stress due to the connection (a horse strap) between the stirrup and on the saddle knife. Given the dimensions, the small thickness makes it possible to use in 2D, the theory of plane stresses two-dimensional Constant Strain Triangle elements using three nodes (CST). All these calculus were carried out using the code Aster (https://www.code-aster. org). 2.2. Experimental methods The mounted bracket on the chassis of the traction machine is tied to the knife with a horse strap. A displacement imposed by a crosspiece is applied to the
CONTACT D. Prin-Conti
knife, which makes it possible to apply the assembly in a coherent, realistic context until reaching the limit load of 1500 N, using a load in the strap axis with a 100 N increment (0–1500 N) with an INSTRON 8872 traction/ compression machine. The soft used is Instron Weave maker-Editor. Three set of strain measurements were used. To satisfy our needs we used little and pertinent strain gauges adapted to the constraints friction load during horse riding [encapsulated gauge WA 350 (CEA-06250UW-350) strain ±1.5% non-linear at strain level over ±0.5], correctly glued on the substrate. The gauge factor announced is 106. In constant temperature, we performed comparative experimental results using strain gauge on the lateral caliper’s parts (gauge 3, see Figure 1), one on the upper parts of the caliper (gauge 1) and on the external face of the saddle knife (gauge 2). We have used a half Wheatstone bridge for the connecting input of the gauges 2 and 3 and a quarter Wheatstone bridge for the gauge 1. The gauges were connected to deltalab strain gauge type EI 616. The values were read step by step on the digital bridge and transcribed on a spreadsheet file.
3. Results and discussion The data associated with the lateral gauge located the stirrup (gauge 2 on Figure 1) and shown in red symbols in Figure 2 presented an approximately constant strain value equal to zero when varying the load from 0 to 1500 N. We conclude that this site is not suitable for laying gauges. It would seem that our gauge rental is in the middle part of the structure that works in bending stress. In this case, the set of stretching stresses of the upper part of the assembly is compensated by the set of stresses of the lower part which works in compression. We note that the sum of the constraints remains at zero, so the outputs are constant. For the gauge located on the upper edge of the stirrup
[email protected]
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
S164
D. P.-CONTI ET AL.
1
2
3 a) stirrup
4
b) saddleknife
Figure 1. Longitudinal stress numerical results and gauges location.
(gauge 1 on Figure 1), experimental data (blue diamond symbols on Figure 2) curve shows a linear behavior. A linear regression was performed and resulted in a function y = 0.541x + 16.301 with a coefficient R2 close to 1. The experimental results relative to the gauge 3 (green triangle symbols on Figure 2) showed no strain in a region where the gauge where placed on the knife; and these experimental results were in agreement with those obtained using the finite element model. An incorrect location has been chosen; the lateral stresses (where the gauge has been placed) are lower than those on the lateral face of the stirrup, whereas on the upper face of the stirrup the calculated stresses are the strongest (gauge 1 on Figure 1, the red part). In fact, it would have been more interesting to set the gauge up on the thinnest part (location 4 on Figure 1). Unfortunately, this part is in contact with the leather strap, so we shifted them in a ‘steep’ location on knife which explains the null strain seen with the maximum loads applied.
4. Conclusions The numerical analysis of stresses promises to find the right and appropriate location, in situ analysis confirms the finite element model. We have several constraints for the gauge’s location: the specific shape of the knife and stirrups, the particular passage of the strap that connects these two pieces. We cannot use the upper side of the knife or the underside of the stirrup because of the leather strap. So, the only available location is the upper side of the
Figure 2. Strain curves.
stirrup. The difficulties of using the strain gauges related to the methodology and the precision of installation (adhesive ad hoc, time and temperature of bonding, protective varnish, friction and contact with the rider’s legs) do not allow easy use outside laboratories. The choice is made by the alternative to use dynamometers mounted in series between the strap and the caliper. Our research also turns on the encrustation of a gauge inside the strap, or even the creation of a conductive fabric with force capture.
Acknowledgements We thank the Reims GRESPI laboratory’s technician for experimental procedure and CEREBIOS laboratory for the financial support for this study.
References Biau S. 2017. 43ème Journée de la Recherche Équine. IFCE. https://mediatheque.ifce.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_ display&id=56271. Cosson O. 2012. La mesure au service de la performance. Equ’idÉe. 54. Martin P, Chèze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Château H. 2016. Effect of the rider position during rising trot on the horse’s biomechanics (back and trunk kinematics and pressure under the saddle). J Biomech. 49(7):1027–1033. Van Beek FE, de Cocq P, Timmerman M, Muller M. 2012. Stirrup forces during horse riding: a comparison between sitting and rising trot. Vet J. 193(1):193–198.
