From ancient genes to modern communities: the ... - Wiley Online Library

17 downloads 6278 Views 148KB Size Report
Adaptations to limitation buffer metabolism against variability in external resource supply; internal ... with molecular damage-repair mechanisms. 4. The cellular ...
Functional Ecology 2005 19, 763–776

REVIEW

S. E Cellular ssay Pierce Review stress etPublishing, al. response and2005 evolution of plant strategies Blackwell Oxford, Functional FEC British ?0269-8463 19 2005 Ecological UK Ecology Society, Ltd.

From ancient genes to modern communities: the cellular stress response and the evolution of plant strategies S. PIERCE†, A. VIANELLI and B. CERABOLINI Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Via J.H. Dunant 3, 21100 Varese, Italy

Summary 1. Two major plant strategy theories attempt to explain how phenotype determines community structure. Crucially, CSR plant strategy theory suggests that stress and sporadic resource availability favour conservative phenotypes, whereas the resource-ratio hypothesis views the spatial heterogeneity of resources as selecting for optimal foraging in chronically unproductive habitats. Which view is most realistic? 2. The ecophysiology literature demonstrates that stress is comprised of two processes: (1) limitation of resource supply to metabolism; and (2) damage to biomembranes, proteins and genetic material (chronic stress). Thus stress is defined mechanistically as the suboptimal performance of metabolism. 3. Adaptations to limitation buffer metabolism against variability in external resource supply; internal storage pools are more consistent. Chronic stress elicits the same ancient cellular stress response in all cellular life: investment in stress metabolites that preserve the integrity and compartmentalization of metabolic components in concert with molecular damage-repair mechanisms. 4. The cellular stress response was augmented by morphological innovations during the Silurian–Devonian terrestrial radiation, during which nutrient limitation appears to have been a principal selection pressure (sensu CSR theory). 5. The modern stress–tolerator syndrome is conservative and supports metabolism in limiting or fluctuating environmental conditions: standing resource pools with high investment/maintenance costs impose high internal diffusion resistances and limit inherent growth rate (sensu CSR theory). 6. The resource-ratio hypothesis cannot account for the cellular stress response or the crucial role of ombrotrophy in primary succession. CSR theory agrees with current understanding of the cellular stress response, terrestrial radiation and modern adaptations recorded in chronically unproductive habitats, and is applicable as CSR classification. Key-words: adaptive radiation, CSR plant strategy theory, optimality, plant functional type, plant strategy. Functional Ecology (2005) 19, 763–776 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01028.x

Introduction CSR plant strategy theory (Grime 1974, 1977, 1979, 2001) and the resource-ratio hypothesis (Tilman 1985, 1988) both aim to provide a functional explanation of plant phenotypes and their role in community processes. Although the two theories advocate profoundly opposing views, particularly concerning the nature of stress and plant responses, indecisive analysis of ‘the debate between Grime and Tilman’ (e.g. Grace 1991) has prolonged the impasse that hinders community © 2005 British Ecological Society

†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]

ecology research. Specifically, Grime invokes stress as one of the principal forces influencing plant communities, with plant responses being conservative in nature. Tilman does not believe stress is a concept applicable to vegetation (Grace 1991), and advocates foraging and optimized resource acquisition as a survival strategy in chronically unproductive habitats. Both theories assume that community composition is a product of the strategies of component species. Thus the aim of this article is to review experimental evidence of the mechanisms underpinning survival in chronically unproductive habitats, to consider which theory is most realistic. We start by summarizing the two theories before discussing the concept of stress and reviewing 763

764 S. Pierce et al.

plant adaptations in chronically unproductive habitats and the evolution of phenotype throughout the terrestrial radiation.

     

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Grime (1979, 2001) suggests that while plants in productive habitats acquire resources via foraging, chronically unproductive environments select for stricter control of growth and development, including the resistance of suboptimal periods for resource acquisition and growth. Nutrient limitation, characterized by long periods of stress punctuated by resource pulses, is proposed as central to the evolution of economic resource use and persistent, unpalatable organs that can rapidly resume assimilation when resources become available. Insufficient stress tolerance, and destructive events such as herbivory, fire, soil erosion or the most extreme climatic conditions, result in tissue death. This is a state from which tissues cannot recover, representing the threshold between stress and disturbance. Regular disturbance events elect for rapid completion of the life cycle within temporal windows of opportunity and survival as seeds (ruderalism). These concepts are distilled into CSR theory, which considers the interplay between competition (autogenic inhibition of biomass production); stress (allogenic inhibition); and disturbance (tissue destruction) in shaping phenotype. Characteristic developmental traits are inherent to competitive (C), stress-tolerant (S) and ruderal (R) strategists, with intermediate strategies apparent. Tilman (1985, 1988) suggests that plants mediate limitations to growth by optimal foraging – allocating photosynthate between root and shoot meristems in a highly plastic manner, thereby regulating the biomass of assimilatory organs to optimize resource acquisition. Two environmental factors, nitrogen availability and light intensity, are considered in this resource-ratio hypothesis – allocation to roots is favoured when N is the most limiting resource; when light is the most limiting resource shoot allocation is favoured. The resource-ratio hypothesis is primarily concerned with plant succession and thus encompasses both unproductive and productive habitats. It assumes that resource availability gradients and competition for resources are the prime determinants of phenotype and thus vegetation change through succession. A fundamental difference between CSR theory and the resource-ratio hypothesis is that the former can account for the influence of intermittent resource acquisition on the evolution of phenotype (phenotypes that can ‘stand by’ ready to intercept resource pulses), whereas the latter does not consider short-term temporal fluctuation in resource availability as a selection pressure influencing phenotype. Surprisingly, this has not previously entered into the debate between Grime and Tilman, or into evaluations of CSR theory (Tilman 1988; Grace 1991; Oksanen & Ranta 1992; Wilson & Lee 2000).

    Environmental conditions change daily and seasonally due to the movement of the planet about its axis and the precession of the axis throughout the year. Thus habitats are characterized by combinations of environmental variables that may be interdependent, or that change in intensity relative to one another throughout the day and as the year progresses. For example, ‘drought’ is not a lack of water, but a period where high evaporation rates outweigh rainfall, dependent on temperature and ultimately light intensity, all of which interact to affect plant growth (Lüttge 1997). In terms of plant growth, it is perhaps more valuable to consider ‘arid’ habitats as characterized by brief periods of optimal water availability, rather than by drought. Similarly, forest understorey plants experience extensive low light limitation briefly interrupted by sunflecks. Even then, high temperatures associated with direct sunlight limit potential carbon gain (Leakey et al. 2003). Indeed, plants rarely experience optimum conditions – even in productive habitats, light intensities may vary between zero (night) and excessively high over diel periods, with only a brief window when optimal light intensity, temperature and resource availability allow entirely unfettered photosynthesis. Thus stress is often the rule, and optimal conditions the ephemeral exception. However, environmental stress factors appear to take radically different forms. What exactly is stress, and is a single underlying adaptive strategy really appropriate? Grime (1979, 2001) defines stress as ‘the external constraints which limit the rate of dry matter production of all or part of the vegetation.’ Larcher (2003) views stress as ‘a significant deviation from the optimal condition of life.’ Crucially, these definitions are not restricted to the resources needed for growth, but also encompass stress factors (stressors) such as temperature or salinity that impose metabolic injury (that is, that damage metabolic machinery, mainly enzymes, biomembranes and genetic material). In the light of the evidence presented in Table 1, stress can be subdivided into two processes: (1) low internal resource supply rates to metabolism; and (2) metabolic injury. These can be interpreted, respectively, as ‘limitation’ and ‘chronic stress’, although ‘stress’ is a useful umbrella term covering both. Thus stress is experienced within cells, and can be defined mechanistically as the suboptimal performance of metabolism. Larcher’s (2003) clear distinction between stress (an internal state) and stressor (the stress stimulus) is essential. Clearly, stress is a state of cells that affects individuals, but can this extend to communities? If we accept that the behaviour of individuals (e.g. growth rate, mortality) can affect the composition of the community (implicit in both theories), then the stress responses of individuals will inevitably result in community-scale effects. Indeed, variation in the prevalence of different stressors favours different species, resulting in a

765 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776 Table 1. Examples of inherent plant adaptations to abiotic stress and underlying mechanisms Stressor/stress-tolerance or avoidance mechanisms

How does the adaptation work?

Example taxa

Citation

Stabilization of membranes, proteins and DNA (via chromatin stabilization) Maintenance of a temperature suitable for metabolism

Retama raetam (Fabaceae)

Merquiol et al. (2002)

Pitcairnia integrifolia (Bromeliaceae), and probably all plants

Lüttge (1997); Beerling et al. (2001)

Pinus taeda (Pinaceae), Lotus japonica (Fabaceae), Mesembryanthemum crystalinum (Aizoaceae), Ceratopteris richardii* (Parkariaceae), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii* (Chlamydomonadaceae) Arabidopsis thaliana† (Brassicaceae), Oryza sativa† (Poaceae) Espeletia schultzii (Asteraceae)

Graumann & Marahiel (1998); Karlson & Imai (2003); Gimalov et al. (2004)

Inhibition of the growth and recrystallization of ice crystals, thereby protecting membranes, proteins and DNA

Ammopiptanthus mongolicus (Fabaceae), Lolium perenne (Poaceae)

Binds to thylakoid membranes, providing stability and integrity Protection of metabolic components against intracellular ice crystal formation

Brassica oleracea† (Brassicaceae)

Wang et al. (2003); Griffith & Yaish (2004) and references therein Sror et al. (2003)

Vitis riparia (Vitaceae)

Jones et al. (2000)

Reactive oxygen species Antioxidant enzyme production (e.g. superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase) and increased SOD activity

Controls free radicals, protecting nucleic acids, polysaccharides, proteins and membrane lipids

Poa sphyondylodes, Bromus inermis, Elymus nutans (Poaceae), Xerophyta viscosa (Velloziaceae), Mesembryanthemum crystalinum (Aizoaceae)

Antioxidant production (carotenoids and anthocyanin)

Blocks light, inhibits free radicals and protects components of metabolism

Craterostigma spp. (Scrophulariaceae)

Hurst et al. (2004); Vicré et al. (2004) and references therein; Zhou & Zhao (2004) Vicré et al. (2004) and references therein

High temperature Plastic expression of heat-shock proteins Evaporative cooling Chilling Expression of cold-shock proteins (CSP)

Production of phospholipids with a greater degree of unsaturation in their fatty acid tails Meristems surrounded by protective tissues

Freezing Expression of antifreeze proteins (AFP)

Expression of cryoprotectin Supercooling – tough bud scales and pectin decrease apoplast permeability, preventing ice crystal penetration into meristematic tissue

RNA stabilization during translation, membrane stabilization

Maintenance of membrane fluidity and thus the compartmentalization and function of metabolism A stress-avoidance mechanism that produces a favourable microclimate, buffers meristematic tissue against low temperatures (that would otherwise decrease membrane fluidity)

Sung et al. (2003) and references therein Smith (1974)

766 S. Pierce et al.

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776 Table 1. Continued Stressor/stress-tolerance or avoidance mechanisms

How does the adaptation work?

Example taxa

Citation

Hypoxia A variable proportion of root aerenchyma tissue (lacunar gas transport system)

Redistribution of O2 from photosynthesis to roots, maintaining internal supply

Senecio aquaticus (Asteraceae), 10 Poaceae and two Cyperaceae from Australia Avicennia spp. (Verbenaceae), Sonneratia spp. (Sonneratiaceae), Xylocarpus spp. (Meliaceae) Phleum pratense (Poaceae), Isoetes alpinus* (Isoetaceae)

Crawford (1989); McDonald et al. (2002)

Eleocharis baldwinii (Cyperaceae)

Ueno (2004)

Aechmea dactylina, Tillandsia usneoides (Bromeliaceae) Werauhia capitata (Bromeliaceae)

Haslam et al. (2002); Pierce et al. (2002) Pierce et al. (2001, 2002)

Geum montanum (Rosaceae), Laminaria digitata, L. saccharina* (Laminariaceae), Delesseria sanguinea* (Delesseriaceae), Phyllophora pseudoceranoides* (Phyllophoraceae), Plocamium cartilagineum* (Plocamiaceae) Yucca brevifolia (Agavaceae), Laminaria saccarina* (Laminariaceae), Cladophora glomerata* (Cladophoraceae), Bryum pseudotriquetrum* (Bryaceae), Ceratodon purpureus* (Ditrichaceae), Grimmia antarctici* (Grimmiaceae) Bauhinia variegata, Ricinus communis (Fabaceae)

Manuel et al. (1999); Dring et al. (2001)

Pneumatophores with lenticels

Stress avoidance – enhancement of external resource supply (O2)

Slow glycolytic metabolism. Expression of anaerobic proteins (including alcohol dehydrogenase)

Delayed exposure to hypoxia. Maintenance of energy supply via fermentation, breakdown of harmful waste products (ethanol)

Low CO2 supply (submergence or water on leaves) Change of photosynthetic pathway (C3 to C4) Recycling of CO2 from respiration via CAM, plastic CAM expression Water-repellent epicuticular wax powder

CO2-concentration mechanism provides a consistent supply of substrate for metabolism Maintains internal CO2 supply during and after stomatal blockage (when external supply is unavailable) Water repellency keeps stomata free of water and maintains CO2 supply

High light intensity (photosynthetically active radiation) Energy dissipation via thermal relaxation of excited electrons in chlorophyll (a.k.a. radiationless transition – measured using associated chlorophyll fluorescence)

Photoprotection (diversion of energy away from photosystem proteins and pigments)

Variable expression of xanthophyll cycle pigments, thermal relaxation

Variable photoprotection in response to a fluctuating stressor

Light screening via transient anthocyanin pigment production

Shields photosystems and provides photoprotection (particularly for young leaves lacking a well developed xanthophyll cycle) Stress-avoidance involving photoprotection

Light screening via anthraquinone pigment (parietin) synthesis Light reflectance by trichomes or epicuticular wax, thermal relaxation

Combined stress-tolerance (energy dissipation) and avoidance (light reflectance) ultimately providing photoprotection

Xanthoria parietina* (Teloschistaceae) Encelia farinosa (Asteraceae), Cotyledon orbiculata, Cotyledon paniculata (Crassulaceae), Tillandsia spp. (Bromeliaceae)

Crawford (1989)

Bertrand et al. (2001); Sorrell (2004)

Ensminger et al. (2001); Barker et al. (2002); Gevaert et al. (2002); Lovelock & Robinson (2002)

Smillie & Hetherington (1999); Manetas et al. (2002); reviewed by Steyn et al. (2002) Solhaug & Gauslaa (2004) Ehleringer (1976); Robinson et al. (1993); Martin et al. (1999); Pierce (2005)

767 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776 Table 1. Continued Stressor/stress-tolerance or avoidance mechanisms Low/variable light intensity Seasonal internal reorganization of leaf anatomy and cell structure (palisade extent, chloroplast number, chloroplast size, thylakoid size and structure) Investment in high chlorophyll and Rubisco contents CAM provides a high photosynthetic capacity

Leaf ‘pattern-gene’ colour variegation

How does the adaptation work?

Example taxa

Citation

Maintains appropriate light interception

Guzmania monostachia (Bromeliaceae)

Maxwell et al. (1999)

Maintenance of photosynthetic capacity – photosynthesis ‘stands by’ for rapid utilization of high light intensities during sunflecks Photoprotection and efficient resource use – photosynthesis ‘stands by’ for rapid utilization of high light energy during sunflecks Leaves have areas of differential light absorbance and light response

Shorea leprosula (Dipterocarpaceae)

Leakey et al. (2003)

Aechmea magdalenae (Bromeliaceae)

Skillman et al. (1999)

Tillandsia butzii (Bromeliaceae)

Pierce (2003)

Pigments shield underlying metabolism

Mesembryanthemum crystalinum (Aizoaceae) Sanionia uncinata* (Amblystegiaceae), Sinapis alba† (Brassicaceae) Lycopersicon esculentum†, Nicotiana tabacum† (Solanaceae), Oryza sativa†, Zea mays† (Poaceae)

Ibdah et al. (2002) Batschauer (1993); Lud et al. (2002) Xu et al. (1998)

Larrea tridentata (Zygophyllaceae)

Ogle & Reynolds (2002)

Umbilicus rupestris (Crassulaceae), Clusia minor (Clusiaceae), Sedum integrifolium (Crassulaceae), Peperomia obtusifolia (Piperaceae) Kalanchoë diagremontiana (Crassulaceae), Polypodium crassifolium, Platycerium veitchii, Microsorium punctatum (all Polypodiaceae)*

Cushman & Borland (2002) and references therein

Anastatica hierochuntica (Brassicaceae)

Hoekstra et al. (2001)

Craterostigma plantagineum (Scrophulariaceae)

Vicré et al. (2004) and references therein

Ultra-violet radiation Expression of betacyanin and acylated flavonol glycosides Photoreactivation

DNA repair

Nucleotide excision repair

DNA repair

Drought Regulation of stomatal and cuticular transpiration Change of photosynthetic pathway (C3 to CAM)

Plasticity in CAM expression

Expression of stress proteins (dehydrin, osmatin) and sugars (raffinose, trehalose) Expression of late embryogenesis-abundant (LEA) proteins, ABA-regulated expression of LEA-like CdeT27-45. Regulation of transpiration by leaf folding

Maintenance of cell water potential and thus functioning of metabolic components Increased water-use efficiency maintains cell water potential and thus functioning of metabolic components, maintenance of resource supply (CO2) Maintenance of resource supply (CO2) following periods of stomatal closure. Increased water-use efficiency maintains cell water potential and thus functioning of metabolic components Stabilization of membranes and proteins Stabilization of membranes and proteins. Maintenance of cell water potential and thus metabolic context

Holtum & Winter (1999); Griffiths et al. (2002)

768 S. Pierce et al.

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776 Table 1. Continued. Stressor/stress-tolerance or avoidance mechanisms

How does the adaptation work?

Example taxa

Citation

Expression of compatible solutes (proline, glycine betaine, polyols)

Stabilization of membranes and enzymes

Ammophila arenaria (Poaceae), Puccinellia martima (Poaceae)

Aquaporin-mediated regulation of root hydraulic conductance Differences in Rubisco large subunit amino acid sequences

Maintenance of cell water potential and thus metabolic context Altered Rubisco specificity factor results in forms that have a greater carboxylase activity (cf. oxygenase activity), increasing carboxylation efficiency and thus water-use efficiency

Agave deserti (Agavaceae)

Smirnoff & Stewart (1985); Crawford (1989) and references therein North et al. (2004)

24 species of diverse taxonomy and ecology native to the Balearic Islands

Galmés et al. (2005)

Maintenance of consistent internal resource supply (N)

Lolium perenne (Poaceae)

Pilbeam (1992)

Maintenance of consistent internal resource supply (P) Stress avoidance by enhancement of external resource supply (N) – carnivory supplies ≈50% of the plant’s N

Schoenus unispiculatus (Cyperaceae) Drosera rotundifolia (Droseraceae)

Shane et al. (2005) Millett et al. (2003)

Maintenance of cytoplasm ionic balance and thereby enzyme function Maintenance of cytoplasm ionic balance

Puccinellia tenuiflora (Poaceae)

Peng et al. (2004)

Thellungiella halophila (Brassicaceae)

Volkov et al. (2003)

Maintenance of cytoplasm ionic balance and thereby enzyme function, increased water-use efficiency (maintenance of cell water potential and thus metabolic context) Maintenance of cytoplasm ionic balance

Mesembryanthemum crystalinum (Aizoaceae)

Winter & Gademann (1991); Adams et al. (1998)

Atriplex spp. (Chenopodiaceae)

Maintenance of enzyme function in younger tissues

Juncus maritimus (Juncaceae)

Crawford (1989) and references therein Crawford (1989)

Avoids damage to plasma membrane, avoids enzyme inhibition (e.g. ATPase, nitrate reductase) Avoids inhibition of cell division, regulates cell wall assembly, ion fluxes, plasma membrane stability, lipid peroxidation

Thlaspi caerulescens (Brassicaceae)

Assuncao et al. (2001)

Picea abies (Pinaceae)

Nagy et al. (2004)

Low nutrient availability Biotypes with slower respiratory rate and growth have longer-lived leaves, retaining and conserving more nutrients Dauciform root production Carnivorous syndrome Salinity Na+ exclusion by a suberized root endodermis, ion channels with greater affinity for K+ than for Na+ Selective Na+ and K+ uptake by root plasma membrane channels Change of photosynthetic pathway (C3 to CAM). Salt dilution in succulent tissues and foliar bladder cells Excretory salt glands Salt removal – NaCl accumulation in older leaves followed by leaf dehiscence Metal toxicity Removal of ions (Zn) from cytosol to the vacuole using elevated expression of high-affinity transporters High cationic exchange capacity of cell walls and high constitutive expression of peroxidases and chitinases limit Al diffusion through cell walls. Root mucilage binds Al

*, Non-angiosperm taxa; †, taxa that may have undergone artificial selection.

769 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

characteristic community structure (Körner 2003). As the community is composed of species suited to the particular regime of stressors, it should not be regarded as ‘stressed’ under a typical environmental regime (Körner 2003, 2004). However, should the environmental regime change too rapidly for community structure to follow suit, then the existing community will include stressed individuals that exhibit lower productivity (conforming to Grime’s definition). Chronically stressed individuals may not die immediately, introducing a lag between the imposition of an unusual environmental regime and species replacement: for woody vegetation a lag of up to ‘several hundred years’ could be expected, during which the vegetation is exposed to a suboptimal environmental regime that favours the formation of a different community (e.g. tree-line–climate relationships; Körner 1999). Thus, although stable climax communities should not be described as ‘stressed’, stress ultimately influences the character of communities and is a driver of temporal community-change processes such as desertification or succession. Stress is therefore a valid, indeed vital, concept for community ecology. Furthermore, Grime’s community-scale definition is entirely compatible with a molecular view of stress: ‘the external constraints which limit [metabolism and thus] the rate of dry matter production of all or part of the vegetation’.

   Different stressors act in essentially the same way: by reducing metabolic performance. Do apparently dissimilar stress adaptations also share a common principle? As demonstrated by the examples in Table 1, adaptations to stress involve investment of resources into three main areas: (1) maintenance of internal resource supply to primary metabolism (limitation avoidance); (2) protection of primary metabolism against structural and functional disruption; and (3) the repair or removal of damaged metabolic components. These are discussed in turn in the following paragraphs, although they are not mutually exclusive and typically occur together.

 

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Adaptations that maintain resource supply do not aid resource acquisition per se, but rather guarantee consistency of supply to metabolism. For example, CO2 supply to leaves is not constant, as rainwater on leaf surfaces can obstruct stomata. In humid habitats such as tropical montane cloud forests, plants may use acuminate ‘drip-tips’, hypostomy and water-repellent indumenta to avoid stomatal blockage (Pierce et al. 2001), but some rely on physiological plasticity in C uptake and storage. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) provides a C-storage pool and flexible CO2 uptake in response to leaf surface wetness, and thus a more consistent internal supply of CO2 to carboxylation (Pierce et al. 2002). Additionally, the main enzyme

used in CAM CO2 uptake, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, has a higher affinity for its substrate than Rubisco. This is advantageous for aquatic taxa, such as Eleocharis spp. and Littorella uniflora, that use CAM or C4 photosynthesis to maintain a consistently high CO2 concentration in chloroplasts (Robe & Griffiths 1990; Ueno 2004). Lüttge (2004) points out that CAM is primarily ‘a strategy for variable, flexible and plastic niche occupation rather than lush productivity.’ Lack of lush productivity for CAM plants can be ascribed to denser, succulent leaves (low specific leaf area, SLA) with higher internal diffusion resistances that lead to slower growth rates (Maxwell et al. 1997). C3 species have a similar approach to maintaining a consistent internal C supply: the grasses Festuca ovina and Nardus stricta maintain a continuous flux of C through storage carbohydrate pools, rather than simply depositing carbohydrates for use in future growth (Atkinson & Farrar 1983). Continuous access to stored carbohydrates buffers growth against variation in instantaneous photosynthesis, but requires leaves to be substantial enough to contain standing storage pools. This leads to high maintenance costs, denser tissues (low SLA) with high internal resistance to CO2 diffusion, and thus low growth rates (Atkinson & Farrar 1983). Low growth rates also result from investment in structural tissues (41–51% of C assimilated each day was used for structural growth; Atkinson & Farrar 1983). Thus the internal supply of resources to metabolism may periodically be divorced from external resource supply, and the ability to grow rapidly is sacrificed for the ability to grow consistently in an inconsistent environment.

    The function of biomembranes, enzymes and genetic material is intrinsically linked to their structure. Stressors induce stress by distorting these structures, thereby changing the properties of biomolecules and inhibiting metabolic processes. For example, chilling acts mainly on cell membranes, decreasing phospholipid movement and membrane fluidity, ultimately decreasing transport across the membrane (Lyons et al. 1964). Chloroplasts are the most sensitive site of chilling, characterized by distorted thylakoid membranes (Kratsch & Wise 2000). Acclimation to chilling involves the production of phospholipids with a greater degree of unsaturation in their fatty acid tails (phospholipids are more widely spaced and the membrane is more fluid at low temperature; Sung et al. 2003); elaboration of the chloroplast envelope to enhance transport (Kratsch & Wise 2000); and cold-shock proteins that act as chaperones – physically holding and stabilizing biomembranes (Gimalov et al. 2004). This is essentially the same situation as heat stress, also characterized by membrane and protein disruption and a similar plant response; heat-shock proteins bond weakly with specific portions of proteins and DNA to form a supporting ‘exoskeleton’ (visualized

770 S. Pierce et al.

by Littlefield & Nelson 1999). Expression of heat-shock proteins responds to temperature over hourly time-scales (Merquiol et al. 2002), but these chaperones are also expressed in response to chilling, reactive oxygen species and salinity (Sabehat et al. 1996; Wang et al. 2004). Similarly, cryoprotectin protects against freezing by binding and stabilizing thylakoid membranes (Sror et al. 2003). However, antifreeze proteins, recorded in organisms as diverse as bacteria, fish, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms, work in a different way: not by binding metabolic components, but by binding ice crystals and preventing crystal growth (Griffith & Yaish 2004). Nonetheless, the role of antifreeze proteins is, in effect, the same as cold-shock and heat-shock proteins: the protection of metabolic components. Metabolic protection is also a key characteristic of other freezingtolerance mechanisms such as supercooling (Table 1). Stress responses traditionally involve two processes: stress tolerance (the ability of the protoplasm to resist stress); and stress avoidance (the isolation of metabolism from stressors) (Larcher 2003). Both protect metabolism. For example, direct sunlight is extremely energetic and exposed habitats are a hostile environment for photosystem proteins and pigments. All photosynthetic organisms rely on energy dissipation systems, such as thermal relaxation and the xanthophyll cycle, to provide photoprotection (Table 1), and these may be particularly well developed in exposed situations (Barker & Adams 1997). Highly specialized foliar trichomes or epicuticular waxes may also reflect sufficient light to photoprotect leaves (Robinson et al. 1993; Pierce 2005). Stress avoidance is also common in habitats experiencing temperature extremes: Raunkiaer (1910) recognized that plant architecture and the position of buds is important, determining the extent to which extremities are exposed during adverse seasons – buds are defensive structures that shield delicate, dormant meristematic tissues from stressors. These stress-avoidance mechanisms typically form part of a syndrome including stress-tolerance traits, all of which protects metabolism.

  

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

No protective mechanism can be 100% effective. Thus plants use a variety of mechanisms to prevent the accumulation of defective macromolecules, repairing DNA (Xu et al. 1998) and also repairing or removing damaged proteins (Klütz 2005). Nucleotide excision repair is one of the most flexible DNA-repair mechanisms, operating by recognizing, excising and replacing damaged portions of DNA (Hoeijmakers 1994), strong evidence for which has been demonstrated in a range of higher plant families (Xu et al. 1998; Table 1). However, the most common repair mechanism is photoreactivation, during which photolyase, energized by blue light or UV-A, repairs the pyrimidine dimers of DNA (Sancar 1990). This has been demonstrated for both lower and higher plants (Batschauer 1993; Lud et al. 2002). Additionally, enzymes such as FtsH may be

expressed that aid in the repair or removal of partially unfolded proteins (Herman et al. 2003).

     In the light of the above evidence, the common principle shared by apparently disparate stress-tolerance mechanisms is the safeguarding of metabolic function. This includes tolerance to chronic stress, which requires a more detailed definition: the preservation of the integrity and arrangement of molecules that comprise metabolism. Clearly, cells become stressed by more than simply a lack of resources, and plants in chronically unproductive habitats cannot rely solely on instantaneous resource acquisition for survival. Although the resource-ratio hypothesis and CSR theory both essentially have resource-based views of stress, the importance of cellular acclimation mechanisms is recognized by Grime (1979, 2001) and is consistent with CSR theory’s conservative stress tolerance. CSR theory is thus compatible with existing life forms in real situations (Table 1), whereas the resource-ratio hypothesis is not. Stresses that occur over time-scales as short as minutes or hours, such as those encountered during sunflecks or cold shock, cannot be countered by growing new leaves or roots. When plants experience pervasive ‘nonresource’ stressors such as chilling, growing out of trouble is clearly not an option – the only viable strategy is resilience and readiness to act when conditions allow. Indeed, ecophysiologists have expressed essentially the same view of stress and a general, conservative stress response (Larcher 2003) – although lacking the wider context of community ecology. What events selected for this common stress response?

        Metabolism in all cellular life is based on the same underlying biophysical principles, depending ultimately on the bonds between atoms, molecules and parts of molecules. The process of energy capture during photosynthesis illustrates that life relies on interactions between energy and matter, and the consequent state of matter. Energy can be either used or dissipated, or will alter matter in a way that could damage metabolism. Conversely, a lack of energy (or suitable matter) stymies biochemical reactions and affects structure. Exposure of metabolism to energy sources is thus a necessary risk that requires regulation – molecular protective mechanisms are an inevitable characteristic of metabolism. Contemporary molecular mechanisms of stress tolerance have been inherited from the earliest forms of life. Chronic stress was a hallmark of life in ocean surface layers and shallow-water benthic habitats during the Archean era (3·8–2·5 Ga b.p.). As the Earth lacked substantial atmospheric oxygen and had no ozone layer, higher UV-B intensities and UV-C exposure

771 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

probably caused DNA damage rates three orders of magnitude greater than today (Cockell 2000), and were probably a major influence on the evolution of early life (Sagan 1973; Pierson et al. 1993). Modern analogues of Archean micro-organisms produce a range of UVscreening and antioxidant pigments (Garcia-Pichel & Castenholz 1991; Wynn-Williams et al. 2002), detoxifying enzymes (Miyake et al. 1991; Lancaster et al. 2004), and suites of enzymes facilitating DNA excision repair or photoreactivation (Karentz et al. 1991; Jeffrey et al. 1996) – all mechanisms demonstrated by modern higher plants that fall within our definition of stress tolerance. Chloroflexus aurantiacus (a contemporary analogue of Archean shallow-water stromatolites) is extremely resistant to UV-C exposure, clearly a relict trait as the ozone layer now shields the biosphere from UV-C (Pierson et al. 1993). Stromatolites experience periodic UV stress, depending on the inclination of the sun throughout the day and variation in sea level, determined by tidal forces. Thus the motion of the solar system imposes inescapable periodic stresses that undoubtedly influenced the evolution of ancient life. Ancient origins for stress tolerance are confirmed by the fact that all cellular life shares ≈300 stress proteins: the ‘minimal stress proteome’ conserved as part of a ‘cellular stress response’ (Klütz 2005). The cellular stress response also includes numerous DNA repair mechanisms, the genes and proteins of which are similar for a range of plant and animal families (Ahmed et al. 1997; Xu et al. 1998). Indeed, the minimal stress proteome includes five chaperone proteins that assist in the recognition, removal or refolding of damaged proteins (cylophilin, DnaJ/Hsp40, DnaK/Hsp70, GrpE & Hsp60; Klütz 2005). Plant cold-shock proteins are ‘nearly identical to prokaryotic CSPs in size and sequence’, supporting an early origin for these chaperones (Karlson & Imai 2003). The ubiquity and operation of these proteins illustrates that the cellular stress response is a general response expressed regardless of the nature of the stress (Klütz 2005). Indeed, ‘overlaps among stress responses extend from the transcriptional level to the intracellular signalling pathways that regulate gene expression … a primary stress exposure might lead to increased resistance to a subsequent stress, a phenomenon known as cross-tolerance’ (Stratmann 2003). Archean life was probably subject to a combination of chronic stresses necessitating crosstolerance, including oxidative stress, high ion densities, high and variable temperatures and extreme pH gradients (Garcia-Pichel 1998; Klütz 2005). Thus the cellular stress response is an ancient, general response that forms the basis of stress tolerance for all cellular life.

      © 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Multicellular plants differ from their single-celled progenitors in that cellular stress tolerance is only a part of a greater stress syndrome involving specialized

tissues, organs and whole-plant architectures, characterized by ‘inherently slow rates of growth, the evergreen habit, long-lived organs, sequestration, and slow turnover of C, mineral nutrients, water, infrequent flowering and the presence of mechanisms which allow the intake of resources during temporarily favourable conditions’ (Grime 2001). The cellular stress response alone does not appear to be sufficient to account for this higher level of organization. For instance, Grime (2001) notes that fast-growing species may also be found in unproductive habitats if local soil conditions provide sufficient nutrients, even in habitats characterized by stressors such as chilling. Furthermore, mineralization occurs in pulses over time-scales as short as hours, and necessitates maintenance of long-lived roots that can stand by, ready to assimilate resources (Campbell & Grime 1989). Mineral nutrient limitation thus appears to be a more important constraint to community productivity than factors such as temperature, and one that Grime (2001) argues is the principal pressure selecting for long tissue life span. Did nutrient limitation have a central role in the evolution of modern phenotypes? Basal land plants were related to modern liverworts (Bryophyta, Hepaticae), evolving ≈490 Ma b.p. (Ordovician period; Kenrick & Crane 1997 and references therein; Sanderson et al. 2004). Extant liverworts are intimately associated with N-fixing cyanobacterial symbionts (Wong & Meeks 2002) and mycorrhizae (Russell & Bulman 2005), suggesting that mineral nutrition could have been a major selection pressure acting on early land plants. Nitrogen is a critical resource that plants never evolved the ability to assimilate directly from plentiful atmospheric N2, with local microbial mineralization being a major bottleneck to productivity. However, basal land plants were not ‘stress-tolerators’ as they relied on turgor for support, lacking the specialized vascular and supporting tissues that also confer constitutive defence (toughness) against herbivory. They also lacked stomata and were restricted to humid, probably riparian, habitats. The Silurian–Devonian terrestrial radiation (439– 363 Ma b.p.) marks the transition from a reliance on the cellular stress response (e.g. the minimum stress proteome, energy-dissipation systems) to a combination of cellular and morphological stress-tolerance mechanisms. Mosses (Bryopsida) appeared in the early/ mid-Silurian (Kenrick & Crane 1997) and were probably capable of suspending metabolism during drought. Proctor (2000) warns that this is often misinterpreted as the ‘ultimate expression of vascular-plant drought tolerance’ and that mosses are actually mesomorphic, ‘ectohydric’ plants that must maintain contact with external water for growth. Thus the cellular stress response presides during drought, but novel morphological adaptations govern growth, specifically the ‘ombrotrophic’ ability of the shoot to hold rainwater − and absorb dissolved NO3 . Moss ombrotrophy may dominate N cycling in primary succession, as N is

772 S. Pierce et al.

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

assimilated and concentrated in shoot tissues to be released following senescence decades later, and areas devoid of moss-derived organic matter experience severe leaching (Bowden 1991; Jónsdóttir et al. 1995). (Note that optimal foraging is highly improbable for these plants as the shoot assimilates all resources, enlargement of which simultaneously increases both light and nutrient interception.) Ombrotrophic ecosystems are more dependent on climatic inputs than on substrate nutrient/water status, allowing colonization of exposed rock. Bowden (1991) measured inputs of 6·1 kg N ha−1 year−1 from precipitation and 0·6 kg N ha−1 a−1 from associated cyanobacterial N2 fixation – small amounts, but highly substantial if accumulated for millions of years. Thus the Siluro–Devonian radiation could be viewed as a similar primary succession, with advancing moss communities producing a suitable edaphic environment for later life forms. By the Mid Silurian, Cooksonia spp. had stomata and a simple vascular system (all advantageous for controlled nutrient uptake and transport), and probably lived in nutrientlimited ecosystems (Edwards 1996 and references therein). Until the Devonian (409–363 Ma b.p.), ‘competition among plants was restricted by their tenuous hold on the abiotic landscape’ (Bateman et al. 1998). However, by this time soils were extensive enough to support more substantial life forms such as Equisetaceae. Extant Equisetum species in unproductive Arctic habitats have deep roots that convey nutrients from soil horizons beyond the reach of sympatric species, concentrating nutrients in tissues and forming nutrientrich litter (Marsh et al. 2000). Equisetum also has mycorrhizal partners and rhizomes (Dhillion 1993; Andersson & Lundegardh 1999) – mycorrhizae were undoubtedly present by the Early Devonian, and probably much earlier (Remy et al. 1994). Although this genus has a later Cenozoic origin (Des Marais et al. 2003), and several species are successful in productive habitats, Equisetum demonstrates that a Devonian body plan had the potential for effective nutrient management and could strongly influence nutrient cycling. Equisetum species also exhibit enhanced constitutive defence in the form of a tough stele and silica deposits in epidermal cell walls (Holzhüter et al. 2003), augmenting the chemical defences also found in liverworts and algae (Perry et al. 2003). Devonian ecosystems may have included arthropod herbivores, although detritivores and their predators were probably the main animal component (Edwards 1996; Kenrick & Crane 1997). Thus vascular plant strategies probably represent the culmination of a protracted liberation from severe nutrient limitation – this can explain why the terrestrial radiation took so long to get fully under way. Soil development was undoubtedly a prerequisite for the Devonian explosion of life forms, during which burgeoning global vegetation cover depleted atmospheric CO2 and increased O2 concentrations (Beerling & Woodward 1997). Limiting CO2 concentrations prompted higher stomatal densities, also allowing greater evapo-

rative cooling and facilitating the evolution of laminate leaves that did not overheat despite greater interception of sunlight (Beerling et al. 2001). By the end of the Middle Devonian, competition for light probably favoured the evolution of lignin, lateral meristems (cambium), and thus tree life forms (Kenrick & Crane 1997). Subsequent to these physiologically driven radiations, regenerative innovations such as seeds (Late Devonian) and flowers (a Cretaceous response to earlier winged insects) facilitated incursions of novel tree life forms into an established canopy. Nutrient limitation has also been a principal selection pressure during Cenozoic radiations (65 Ma b.p. to present). For the African grass genus Ehrharta (crown age 11·3–4·5 Ma b.p.), molecular phylogenetics demonstrates that all ancestral forms are slow-growing stress-tolerators (sensu Grime) native to oligotrophic (nutrient-deficient) habitats, from which faster-growing ruderal species later radiated, partly in response to more fertile substrates (Verboom et al. 2004). Similarly, primitive Bromeliaceae (≈65 Ma b.p.) are tough-leaved C3 herbs of humid, oligotrophic habitats, whereas all xerophytic CAM epiphytes are extant (Benzing 2000 and references therein). In this case, stress-tolerators from a chronically unproductive habitat laid the foundation for successful adaptive radiation into a range of even more unproductive niches that required further specialization. Indeed, nutrient-absorbing foliar trichomes (a defining feature of Bromeliaceae) maintain an absorptive function despite modification to mediate high light stress for extant taxa (Pierce 2005). Bromeliads could not have evolved the epiphytic/lithophytic habit were it not for this ability to absorb mineral nutrients via foliar trichomes and to use these meagre resources efficiently (Benzing & Renfrow 1980). These are also ombrotrophic plants for which optimal foraging cannot operate. Indeed, Benzing (2000) concludes that nutrient limitation encourages investment in persistent leaves at the expense of growth rate and reproduction, with this robust habit preadapting many species to further stressors such as drought and salinity. Furthermore, slow tissue replacement following disturbance places bromeliads at particular disadvantage, necessitating investment in defensive chemistry and ‘strengthening polymers’ (sensu CSR theory). This constitutive defence may be exaggerated in extant life forms such as the spiny subfamily Bromelioideae (reviewed by Benzing 2000). Thus the cellular stress response and adaptations to nutrient limitation are both conservative responses, but nutrient limitation appears to have played a further role in the evolution of the stress-tolerant syndrome for modern terrestrial plants. This is an appealing hypothesis, because it can explain radiation from basal taxa relying on cellular stress-tolerance mechanisms and chemical defence, through true stress-tolerator phenotypes with additional constitutive defence, to highly specialized stress-tolerators with flexible photosynthetic modes and more effective physical defence (e.g. Cactaceae).

773 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

         CSR theory is well supported by the above functional evidence. However, are CSR theory and the resourceratio hypothesis useful? It could be argued that the resource-ratio hypothesis has a focused goal – aiming to explain how resource availability governs species composition along environmental gradients – and appears to provide a coherent solution. However, the environment includes short-term fluctuations that can be significant survival risks, and includes stressors other than resource limitation. The failure of the resource-ratio hypothesis to consider these aspects of the environment as selection pressures can explain why it conflicts with real phenotypes in chronically unproductive habitats. Additionally, the model of root competition inherent to the resource-ratio hypothesis is too simple to approximate real systems (Craine et al. 2005). More importantly, it lacks unambiguous experimental support (Gleeson & Tilman 1994), with optimality models contradicting real plant responses to nutrient addition in chronically unproductive habitats (partitioning to roots is favoured in response to higher nutrient availability, enhancing luxury consumption in support of future growth; Van Wijk et al. 2003). The only conceivable situation in which the resource-ratio hypothesis could be useful is on planets that do not experience environmental fluctuations imposed by rotation and precession. CSR theory appears to provide a realistic theoretical framework for the functional classification of terrestrial plants: species endemic to unproductive habitats rely on augmenting metabolism (S) or, in extremis, avoiding disturbance (R), and those of productive habitats rely on foraging (C). However, in nature all plants possess a minimal stress response. Conversely, stresstolerant species are capable of some morphological plasticity, as illustrated by root proliferation of the late-successional alpine Carex curvula in response to nutrient patches (Körner 1999). Thus absolutely pure primary strategies, such as the extreme C, S and R corners of Grime’s triangle, are unlikely to exist in nature – actual adaptive strategies represent variations within this theoretical framework. Can real plants, growing in situ, be classified according to this system? CSR classification (Hodgson et al. 1999) achieves just this, and has been used successfully to investigate the mechanisms underpinning a primary succession on a glacier foreland (Caccianiga et al. 2005). This developing methodology undoubtedly provides the most promising opportunity for future research into vegetation processes.

Conclusion © 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

The resource-ratio hypothesis disagrees with a vast body of literature representing a contemporary, multidisciplinary view of stress, stress responses and terres-

trial adaptive radiation. In contrast, CSR theory includes a realistic view of adaptive radiation in response to stress and is useful for understanding community processes.

Acknowledgements We thank Roberta M. Ceriani for discussion during the conception of this article, and Alessandra Luzzaro and Rossella De Andreis for pointing out several references. S.P. was supported by the Native Flora Centre (Centro Flora Autoctona), via the University of Insubria.

References Adams, P., Nelson, D.E., Yamada, S. et al. (1998) Tansley Review 97: Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Aizoaceae). New Phytologist 138, 171–190. Ahmed, M., Jarillo, J.A., Klimczak, L.J. et al. (1997) An enzyme similar to animal type II photolyases mediates photoreactivation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9, 199–207. Andersson, T.N. & Lundegardh, B. (1999) Growth of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense) under low light and low nitrogen conditions. Weed Science 47, 41– 46. Assuncao, A.G.L., Da Costa Martins, F., De Folter, S., Vooijs, R., Schat, H. & Aarts, M.G.M. (2001) Elevated expression of metal transporter genes in three accessions of the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 217–226. Atkinson, C.J. & Farrar, J.F. (1983) Allocation of photosynthetically-fixed carbon in Festuca ovina L. & Nardus stricta L. New Phytologist 95, 519–531. Barker, D.H. & Adams, W.W. (1997) The xanthophyll cycle and energy dissipation in differently oriented faces of the cactus Opuntia macrorhiza. Oecologia 109, 353–361. Barker, D.H., Adams, W.W. III, Demming-Adams, B., Logan, B.A., Verhoeven, A.S. & Smith, S.D. (2002) Nocturnally retained zeaxanthin does not remain engaged in a state primed from energy dissipation during the summer in two Yucca species growing in the Mojave Desert. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 95–103. Bateman, R.M., Crane, P.R., DiMichele, W.A. et al. (1998) Early evolution of land plants: phylogeny, physiology, and ecology of the primary terrestrial radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 263–292. Batschauer, A. (1993) A plant gene for photolyase: an enzyme catalysing the repair of UV-light-induced DNA damage. Plant Journal 4, 705–709. Beerling, D.J. & Woodward, F.I. (1997) Changes in land plant function over the Phanerozoic: reconstructions based on the fossil record. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 124, 137–153. Beerling, D.J., Osborne, C.P. & Chaloner, W.G. (2001) Evolution of leaf-form in land plants linked to atmospheric CO2 decline in the Late Palaeozoic era. Nature 410, 352– 354. Benzing, D.H. (2000) Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Benzing, D.H. & Renfrow, A. (1980) The nutritional dynamics of Tillandsia circinnata in southern Florida and the origin of the ‘air plant’ strategy. Botanical Gazette 141, 165 –172. Bertrand, A., Castonguay, Y., Nadeau, P. et al. (2001) Molecular and biochemical responses of perennial forage crops to oxygen deprivation at low temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 1085 –1093.

774 S. Pierce et al.

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Bowden, R.D. (1991) Inputs, outputs, and accumulation of nitrogen in an early successional moss (Polytrichum) ecosystem. Ecological Monographs 61, 207–223. Caccianiga, M., Luzzaro, A., Pierce, S., Ceriani, R.M. & Cerabolini, B. (2005) The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. Oikos in press. Campbell, B.D. & Grime, J.P. (1989) A new method of exposing root systems in controlled patchiness in mineral nutrient supply. Annals of Botany 63, 395 – 400. Cockell, C.S. (2000) Ultraviolet radiation and the photobiology of Earth’s early oceans. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 30, 467– 499. Craine, J.M., Fargione, J. & Sugita, S. (2005) Supply preemption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytologist in press. Crawford, R.M.M. (1989) Studies in Plant Survival. Ecological Case Histories of Plant Adaptation to Adversity. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK. Cushman, J.C. & Borland, A.M. (2002) Induction of Crassulacean acid metabolism by water limitation. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 295–310. Des Marais, D.L., Smith, A.R., Britton, D.M. & Pryer, K.M. (2003) Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of extant horsetails, Equisetum, based on chloroplast DNA sequence data (rbcl and trnL-F). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164, 737–751. Dhillion, S.S. (1993) Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas of Equisetum species in Norway and the USA – occurrence and mycotrophy. Mycological Research 97, 656–660. Dring, M.J., Wagner, A. & Lüning, K. (2001) Contribution of the UV component of natural sunlight to photoinhibition of photosynthesis in six species of subtidal brown and red seaweeds. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 1153–1164. Edwards, D. (1996) New insights into early land ecosystems: a glimpse of a Lilliputian world. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 90, 159–174. Ehleringer, J.L., Björkman, O. & Mooney, H.A. (1976) Leaf pubescence: effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a desert shrub. Science 192, 376–377. Ensminger, I., Xyländer, C., Hagen, C. & Braune, W. (2001) Strategies providing success in a variable habitat. II. Dynamic control of photosynthesis in Cladophora glomerata. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 769–779. Galmés, J., Flexas, J., Keys, A.J. et al. (2005) Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 28, 571–579. Garcia-Pichel, F. (1998) Solar ultraviolet and the evolutionary history of cyanobacteria. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 28, 321–347. Garcia-Pichel, F. & Castenholz, R.W. (1991) Characterization and biological implications of scytonemin, a cyanobacterial sheath pigment. Journal of Phycology 27, 395 – 409. Gevaert, F., Creach, A., Davoult, D., Holl, A.-C., Seuront, L. & Lemoine, Y. (2002) Photo-inhibition and seasonal photosynthetic performance of the seaweed Laminaria saccharina during a simulated tidal cycle: chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and pigment analysis. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 859–872. Gimalov, F.R., Baymiev, A.Kh, Matniyazov, R.T., Chemeris, A.V. & Vakhitov, V.A. (2004) Initial stages of low-temperature induction of cabbage cold shock protein gene Csp5. Biochemistry (Moscow) 69, 575–579. Gleeson, S.K. & Tilman, D. (1994) Plant allocation, growth rate and successional status. Functional Ecology 8, 543– 550. Grace, J.B. (1991) A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman. Functional Ecology 5, 583–587. Graumann, P.L. & Marahiel, M.A. (1998) A superfamily of proteins containing the cold shock domain. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23, 286–290.

Griffith, M. & Yaish, M.W.F. (2004) Antifreeze proteins in overwintering plants: a tale of two activities. Trends in Plant Science 9, 399–405. Griffiths, H., Helliker, B., Roberts, A. et al. (2002) Regulation of Rubisco activity in crassulacean acid metabolism plants: better late than never. Functional Plant Biology 29, 689–696. Grime, J.P. (1974) Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250, 26–31. Grime, J.P. (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111, 1169–1194. Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, Chichester, UK. Grime, J.P. (2001) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UK. Haslam, R.P., Borland, A.M. & Griffiths, H. (2002) Shortterm plasticity of crassulacean acid metabolism expression in the epiphytic bromeliad, Tillandsia usneoides. Functional Plant Biology 29, 749–756. Herman, C., Prakash, S., Lu, C.Z., Matouschek, A. & Gross, C.A. (2003) Lack of a robust unfoldase activity confers a unique level of substrate specificity to the universal AAA protease FtsH. Molecular Cell 11, 659–669. Hodgson, J.G., Wilson, P.J., Hunt, R., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. (1999) Allocating CSR plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos 85, 282–294. Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. (1994) DNA repair, incisions for excision. Nature 371, 432– 435. Hoekstra, F.A., Golovina, E.A. & Buitink, J. (2001) Mechanisms of desiccation tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6, 431– 438. Holtum, J.A.M. & Winter, K. (1999) Degrees of crassulacean acid metabolism in tropical epiphytic and lithophytic ferns. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26, 749 –757. Holzhüter, G., Narayanan, K. & Gerber, T. (2003) Structure of silica in Equisetum arvense. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 376, 512–517. Hurst, A.C., Grams, T.E.E. & Ratajczak, R. (2004) Effects of salinity, high irradiance, ozone, and ethylene on mode of photosynthesis, oxidative stress and oxidative damage in the C3/CAM intermediate plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 187–197. Ibdah. M., Krins, A., Seidlitz, H.K., Heller, W., Strack, D. & Vogt, T. (2002) Spectral dependence of flavonol and betacyanin accumulation in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum under enhanced ultraviolet radiation. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1145 –1154. Jeffrey, W.H., Aas, P., Lyons, M.M., Coffin, R.B., Pledger, R.J. & Mitchell, D.L. (1996) Ambient solar radiation-induced photodamage in marine bacterioplankton. Photochemistry and Photobiology 64, 419 – 427. Jones, K.S., McKersie, B.D. & Paroschy, J. (2000) Prevention of ice propagation by permeability barriers in bud axes of Vitis vinifera. Canadian Journal of Botany 78, 3–9. Jónsdóttir, I.S., Callaghan, T.V. & Lee, J.A. (1995) Fate of added nitrogen in a moss–sedge Arctic community and effects of increased nitrogen deposition. Science of the Total Environment 160/161, 677–685. Karentz, D., Cleaver, J.E. & Mitschell, D.L. (1991) Cell survival characteristics and molecular responses of Antarctic phytoplankton to ultraviolet-B radiation. Journal of Phycology 27, 326–341. Karlson, D. & Imai, R. (2003) Conservation of the cold shock domain protein family in plants. Plant Physiology 131, 12–15. Kenrick, P. & Crane, P.R. (1997) The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389, 33–38. Klütz, D. (2005) Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annual Reviews in Physiology 67, 225–257. Körner, C. (1999) Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

775 Cellular stress response and evolution of plant strategies

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Körner, C. (2003) Limitation and stress – always or never? Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 141–143. Körner, C. (2004) Individuals have limitations, not communities – a response to Marrs, Weiher and Lortie et al. Journal of Vegetation Science 15, 581–582. Kratsch, H.A. & Wise, R.R. (2000) The ultrastructure of chilling stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 337–350. Lancaster, V.L., LoBrutto, R., Selvaraj, F.M. & Blankenship, R.E. (2004) A Cambialistic superoxide dismutase in the thermophilic photosynthetic bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus. Journal of Bacteriology 186, 3408–3414. Larcher, W. (2003) Physiological Plant Ecology, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Leakey, A.D.B., Press, M.C. & Scholes, J.D. (2003) Hightemperature inhibition of photosynthesis is greater under sunflecks than uniform irradiance in a tropical rain forest tree seedling. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1681–1690. Littlefield, O. & Nelson, H.C.M. (1999) A new use for the ‘wing’ of the ‘winged’ helix-turn-helix motif in the HSF– DNA cocrystal. Nature Structural Biology 6, 464 – 470. Lovelock, C.E. & Robinson, S.A. (2002) Surface reflectance properties of Antarctic moss and their relationship to plant species, pigment composition and photosynthetic function. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1239–1250. Lud, D., Moerdijk, T.C.W., Van de Poll, W.H., Buma, A.G.J. & Huiskes, A.H.L. (2002) DNA damage and photosynthesis in Antarctic and Arctic Sanionia uncinata (Hedw.) Loeske under ambient and enhanced levels of UV-B radiation. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1579–1589. Lüttge, U. (1997) Physiological Ecology of Tropical Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Lüttge, U. (2004) Ecophysiology of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM). Annals of Botany 93, 629–652. Lyons, J.M., Wheaton, T.A. & Pratt, H.K. (1964) Relationship between the physical nature of mitochondrial membranes and chilling sensitivity in plants. Plant Physiology 39, 262–268. Manetas, Y., Drinia, A. & Petropoulou, Y. (2002) High contents of anthocyanins in young leaves are correlated with low pools of xanthophyll cycles components and low risk of photoinhibition. Photosynthetica 40, 349–354. Manuel, N., Cornic, G., Aubert, S., Choler, P., Bligny, R. & Heber, U. (1999) Protection against photoinhibition in the alpine plant Geum montanum. Oecologia 119, 149–158. Marsh, A.S., Arnone, J.A. III, Bormann, B.T. & Gordon, J.C. (2000) The role of Equisetum in nutrient cycling in an Alaskan shrub wetland. Journal of Ecology 88, 999–1011. Martin, C.E., Tüffers, A., Herppich, W.B. & von Willert, D.J. (1999) Utilization and dissipation of absorbed light energy in the epiphytic Crassulacean acid metabolism bromeliad Tillandsia ionantha. International Journal of Plant Science 160, 307–313. Maxwell, K., von Caemmerer, S. & Evans, J.R. (1997) Is a low internal conductance to CO2 a consequence of succulence in plants with Crassulacean acid metabolism? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24, 777–786. Maxwell, K., Marrison, J.L., Leech, R.M., Griffiths, H. & Horton, P. (1999) Chloroplast acclimation in leaves of Guzmania monostachia in response to high light. Plant Physiology 121, 89 –95. McDonald, M.P., Galwey, N.W. & Colmer, T.D. (2002) Similarity and diversity in adventitious root anatomy as related to root aeration among a range of wetland and dryland grass species. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 441–451. Merquiol, E., Pnueli, L., Cohen, M. et al. (2002) Seasonal and diurnal variations in gene expression in the desert legume Retama raetam. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1627–1638. Millett, J., Jones, R.I. & Waldron, S. (2003) The contribution of insect prey to the total nitrogen content of sundews (Drosera spp.) determined in situ by stable isotope analysis. New Phytologist 158, 527–534.

Miyake, C., Michihata, F. & Asada, K. (1991) Scavenging of hydrogen-peroxide in prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae – acquisition of ascorbate peroxidase during the evolution of cyanobacteria. Plant Cell Physiology 32, 33 –43. Nagy, N.E., Dalen, L.S., Jones, D.L., Swenson, B., Fossdal, C.G. & Eldhuset, T.D. (2004) Cytological and enzymatic responses to aluminium stress in root tips of Norway spruce seedlings. New Phytologist 163, 595 – 607. North, G.B., Martre, P. & Nobel, P.S. (2004) Aquaporins account for variations in hydraulic conductance for metabolically active root regions of Agave deserti in wet, dry, and rewetted soil. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 219–228. Ogle, K. & Reynolds, J.F. (2002) Desert dogma revisited: coupling of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in the desert shrub, Larrea tridentata. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 909–921. Oksanen, L. & Ranta, E. (1992) Plant strategies along mountain vegetation gradients: a test of two theories. Journal of Vegetation Science 3, 175–186. Peng, Y.-H., Zhu, Y.-F., Mao, Y.-Q., Wang, S.M., Su, W.-A. & Tang, Z.-C. (2004) Alkali grass resists salt stress through high [K+] and an endodermis barrier to Na+. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 939–949. Perry, N.B., Burgess, E.J., Foster, L.M. & Gerard, P.J. (2003) Insect antifeedant sesquiterpene acetals from the liverwort Lepidolaena clavigera. Tetrahedron Letters 44, 1651–1653. Pierce, S. (2003) Variegated foliage and photosynthesis. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 53 (216–220), 240. Pierce, S. (2005) The jeweled armor of Tillandsia – multifaceted or elongated trichomes provide photoprotection. Aliso in press. Pierce, S., Maxwell, K., Griffiths, H. & Winter, K. (2001) Hydrophobic trichome layers and epicuticular wax powders in Bromeliaceae. American Journal of Botany 88, 1371–1389. Pierce, S., Winter, K. & Griffiths, H. (2002) The role of CAM in high rainfall cloud forests: an in situ comparison of photosynthetic pathways in Bromeliaceae. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 1181–1189. Pierson, B.K., Mitchell, H.K. & Ruff-Roberts, A.L. (1993) Chloroflexus aurantiacus and ultraviolet radiation: implications for Archean shallow-water stromatolites. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 23, 243–260. Pilbeam, C.J. (1992) Effect of nitrogen supply on the growth and senescence of leaves of Lolium perenne with contrasting rates of leaf respiration. Annals of Botany 70, 365–370. Proctor, M.C.F. (2000) The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought. Plant Ecology 151, 41–49. Raunkiaer, C. (1910) Statistik der Lebensformen als Grundlage für die biologische Pflanzengeographie. Beihefte Zum Botanischen Centralblatt 27, 171–206. Remy, W., Taylor, T.N., Hass, H. & Kerp, H. (1994) Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 11841–11843. Robe, W.E. & Griffiths, H. (1990) Photosynthesis of Littorella uniflora grown under two PAR regimes: C3 and CAM gas exchange and the regulation of internal CO2 and O2 concentrations. Oecologia 85, 128–136. Robinson, S.A., Lovelock, C.E. & Osmond, C.B. (1993) Wax as a mechanism for photoprotection against photoinhibition – a study of Cotyledon orbiculata. Botanica Acta 106, 307–313. Russell, J. & Bulman, S. (2005) The liverwort Marchantia foliacea forms a specialized symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the genus Glomus. New Phytologist 165, 567–579. Sabehat, A., Weiss, D. & Lurie, S. (1996) The correlation between heat-shock protein accumulation and persistence and chilling tolerance in tomato fruit. Plant Physiology 110, 531–537.

776 S. Pierce et al.

© 2005 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 19, 763–776

Sagan, C. (1973) Ultraviolet selection pressure on the earliest organisms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 39, 195–200. Sancar, G.B. (1990) DNA photolyase: physical properties, action mechanism, and roles in dark repair. Mutation Research 236, 147–160. Sanderson, M.J., Thorne, J.L., Wikström, N. & Bremer, K. (2004) Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. American Journal of Botany 91, 1656 –1665. Shane, M.W., Dixon, K.W. & Lambers, H. (2005) The occurrence of dauciform roots amongst Western Australian reeds, rushes and sedges, and the impact of phosphorus supply on dauciform-root development in Schoenus unispiculatus (Cyperaceae). New Phytologist 165, 887–898. Skillman, J.B., Garcia, M. & Winter, K. (1999) Whole-plant consequences of Crassulacean acid metabolism for a tropical forest understorey plant. Ecology 80, 1584 –1593. Smille, R.M. & Hetherington, S.E. (1999) Photoabatement by anthocyanin shields photosynthetic systems from light stress. Photosynthetica 36, 451– 463. Smirnoff, N. & Stewart, G.R. (1985) Stress metabolites and their role in coastal plants. Vegetatio 62, 273–278. Smith, A.P. (1974) Bud temperature in relation to nyctinastic leaf movement in an Andean giant-rosette plant. Biotropica 6, 263 –266. Solhaug, K.A. & Gauslaa, Y. (2004) Photosynthates stimulate the UV-B induced fungal anthraquinone synthesis in the foliose lichen Xanthoria parietina. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 167–176. Sorrell, B.K. (2004) Regulation of root anaerobiosis and carbon translocation by light and root aeration in Isoetes alpinus. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 1102–1111. Sror, H.A.M., Tischendorf, G., Sieg, F., Schmitt, J.M. & Hincha, D.K. (2003) Cryoprotectin protects thylakoids during a freeze-thaw cycle by a mechanism involving stable membrane binding. Cryobiology 47, 191–203. Steyn, W.J., Wand, S.J.E., Holcroft, D.M. & Jacobs, G. (2002) Anthocyanins in vegetative tissues: a proposed unified function in photoprotection. New Phytologist 155, 349– 361. Stratmann, J. (2003) Ultraviolet-B radiation co-opts defense signalling pathways. Trends in Plant Science 8, 526–533. Sung, D.Y., Kaplan, F., Lee, K.J. & Guy, C.L. (2003) Acquired tolerance to temperature extremes. Trends in Plant Science 8, 179–187. Tilman, D. (1985) The resource ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist 125, 827–852. Tilman, D. (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA. Ueno, O. (2004) Environmental regulation of photosynthetic metabolism in the amphibious sedge Eleocharis baldwinii and comparisons with related species. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 627–639. Van Wijk, M.T., Williams, M., Gough, L., Hobbie, S.E. & Shaver, G.R. (2003) Luxury consumption of soil nutrients: a possible competitive strategy in above-ground and

below-ground biomass allocation and root morphology for slow-growing arctic vegetation. Journal of Ecology 91, 664 – 676. Verboom, G.A., Linder, H.P. & Stock, W.D. (2004) Testing the adaptive nature of radiation: growth form and life history divergence in the African grass genus Ehrharta (Poaceae: Ehrhartoideae). American Journal of Botany 91, 1364 –1370. Vicré, M., Farrant, J.M. & Driouich, A. (2004) Insights into the cellular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance among angiosperm resurrection plant species. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 1329–1340. Volkov, V., Wang, B., Dominy, P.J., Fricke, W. & Amtmann, A. (2003) Thellungiella halophila, a salt-tolerant relative of Arabidopsis thaliana, possesses effective mechanisms to discriminate between potassium and sodium. Plant, Cell & Environment 27, 1–14. Wang, W., Wei, L. & Wang, G. (2003) Multistep purification of an antifreeze protein from Ammopiptanthus mongolicus by chromatographic and electrophoretic methods. Journal of Chromatographic Science 41, 489 – 493. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O. & Altman, A. (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9, 244 –252. Wilson, J.B. & Lee, W.G. (2000) C-S-R triangle theory: community-level predictions, tests, evaluation of criticisms, and relation to other theories. Oikos 91, 77–96. Winter, K. & Gademan, R. (1991) Daily changes in CO2 and water vapour exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and leaf water relations in the halophyte Mesembryanthemum crystallinum during the induction of crassulacean acid metabolism in response to high NaCl salinity. Plant Physiology 95, 768–776. Wong, F.C.Y. & Meeks, J.C. (2002) Establishment of a functional symbiosis between the cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme and the bryophyte Antheroceros punctatus requires genes involved in nitrogen control and initiation of heterocyst differentiation. Microbiology 148, 315–323. Wynn-Williams, D.D., Edwards, H.G.M., Newton, E.M. & Holder, J.M. (2002) Pigmentation as a survival strategy for ancient and modern photosynthetic microbes under high ultraviolet stress on planetary surfaces. International Journal of Astrobiology 1, 39 – 49. Xu, H., Swoboda, I., Bhalla, P.L., Sijbers, A.M., Zhao, C., Ong, E.-K., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. & Singh, M.B. (1998) Plant homologue of human excision repair gene ERCC1 points to conservation of DNA repair mechanisms. Plant Journal 13, 823–829. Zhou, R. & Zhao, H. (2004) Seasonal pattern of antioxidant enzyme system in the roots of perennial forage grasses grown in alpine habitat, related to freezing tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 121, 399 – 408. Received 18 March 2005; revised 23 May 2005; accepted 26 May 2005