Glucose-Regulated Gene Expression Maintaining the ... - Diabetes

2 downloads 0 Views 364KB Size Report
Glucose-Regulated Gene Expression Maintaining the. Glucose-Responsive State of -Cells. Frans Schuit, Daisy Flamez, Anick De Vos, and Daniel Pipeleers.
Glucose-Regulated Gene Expression Maintaining the Glucose-Responsive State of ␤-Cells Frans Schuit, Daisy Flamez, Anick De Vos, and Daniel Pipeleers

The mammalian ␤-cell has particular properties that synthesize, store, and secrete insulin in quantities that are matched to the physiological demands of the organism. To achieve this task, ␤-cells are regulated both acutely and chronically by the extracellular glucose concentration. Several in vivo and in vitro studies indicate that preservation of the glucose-responsive state of ␤-cells is lost when the extracellular glucose concentration chronically deviates from the normal physiological condition. Experiments with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide suggest that the maintenance of the functional state of ␤-cells depends on protein(s) with rapid turnover. Analysis of newly synthesized proteins via two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and highdensity gene expression microarrays demonstrates that the glucose-dependent preservation of ␤-cell function is correlated with glucose regulation of a large number of ␤-cell genes. Two different microarray analyses of glucose regulation of the mRNA profile in ␤-cells show that the sugar influences expression of multiple genes involved in energy metabolism, the regulated insulin biosynthetic/secretory pathway, membrane transport, intracellular signaling, gene transcription, and protein synthesis/degradation. Functional analysis of some of these regulated gene clusters has provided new evidence for the concept that cataplerosis, the conversion of mitochondrial metabolites into lipid intermediates, is a major metabolic pathway that allows ␤-cell activation independently of closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Diabetes 51 (Suppl. 3):S326 –S332, 2002

ifferentiated pancreatic ␤-cells exhibit a phenotype enabling a complex cellular response to changes in the extracellular glucose concentration within the physiological range (i.e., between 3 and 10 mmol/l). This response can be dissected into several pathways and orders of magnitude of the following time kinetics. Within minutes of exposure to elevated extracellular glucose, profound effects are observed at the level of metabolic flux, adenine nucleotide potential ([ATP]/[ADP] as well as [NAD(P)H/[NAD(P)⫹]), cellular electrical activity, and cytosolic [Ca2⫹] (1). As a

D

From the Diabetes Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Frans C. Schuit, MD, PhD, Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]. Received for publication 2 April 2002 and accepted in revised form 8 May 2002. FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; K⫹ATP channel, ATP-sensitive potassium channel. The symposium and the publication of this article have been made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier, Paris. S326

consequence, exocytosis of a readily releasable pool of insulin secretory granules is triggered (1). After this first phase of insulin release (⬃10 min), a second wave of release builds up by recruiting new granules into the pool that is exocytosis competent (1,2). In the meantime, ribosomes accelerate translation (3) by speeding up both initiation (4) and elongation (4,5) steps. Translational rates of certain proteins such as preproinsulin accelerate preferentially over that of other (housekeeping) proteins (3). This result could be explained (at least in part) because there is some indication that within 1 hour of incubation in high glucose, transcriptional activity of the insulin gene (6) is increased, enlarging the pool of transcripts to be translated. After hours of glucose stimulation, the activity of many other genes is altered, resulting in an altered ␤-cell phenotype, as evidenced by the cellular responsiveness to glucose. Glucose itself seems responsible for the maintenance of this phenotype, at least in vitro (7). Exposing rat ␤-cells for 9 days to low glucose (6 mmol/l) reduces the cellular responsiveness to glucose compared with cells cultured at 10 mmol/l glucose (7). Preferential translation of preproinsulin is diverted into synthesis of non-insulin proteins (7). When cultured at even lower glucose concentrations for several days, the cells are committed to programmed cell death (8). Conversely, ␤-cells exposed for days to weeks to a supra-physiological glucose concentration lose part of their differentiated phenotype as well (9 –11) and assume a “basal” state of hyperactivity (7). Depending on the genetic background, this adaptation can result in activation of signaling pathways that promote growth and proliferation (12). Glucose-stimulated growth of the islet ␤-cell mass as well as glucose protection against apoptosis (8) imply that glucose not only regulates the phenotype of existing ␤-cells, but also regulates cell number. A major challenge in diabetes research is understanding the pleiotropic effects of glucose on ␤-cells in molecular terms, understanding their sites of dysregulation in diabetic patients, and finding drugs that can cure disease by restoring abnormal function. From this point of view, understanding the function of various proteins that are directly responsible for the glucose-responsive ␤-cell phenotype is of great interest. Also, it is relevant to investigate which of this set is a primary culprit in the pathogenesis of diabetes, either by loss or by abnormal gain of function. Consequentially, it should be explored how abnormal function can be restored to normal by selective drugs. With the exception of the diverse subtypes of maturityonset diabetes of the young (13), this level of molecular understanding of the ␤-cell and diabetes is still largely lacking. The present review will focus on glucose regulaDIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

F. SCHUIT AND ASSOCIATES

FIG. 1. Functional clusters of glucose-responsive genes in FACS-purified rat ␤-cells. To assess which genes are responsible for the glucose-responsive phenotype of rat ␤-cells, mRNA profiles of ␤-cells cultured for 24 h in 3 or 10 mmol/l glucose, were compared via Affymetrix rat Genome U34A oligonucleotide arrays, as described by Flamez et al. (16).

tion of ␤-cell gene expression related to the maintenance of the differentiated phenotype. MULTIPLE GENES ARE REGULATED IN ␤-CELLS BY GLUCOSE

In general, the acute minute-to-minute effects of glucose regulation of ␤-cells primarily depend on the allosteric or covalent modification of existing effector or regulator proteins. Examples of this type of regulation are the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K⫹ATP channels) by a rise in the cellular [ATP]/[ADP] ratio (14) and GTP-induced activation of the small G-protein Rab-3a, which controls vesicle budding and exocytosis (15). On the other hand, it is widely assumed that the subacute (hours) and chronic (days) effects of glucose require, in addition to the acute regulatory effects, changes in the expression level of the very genes that encode proteins involved in the acute regulation of ␤-cell function. In line with the above examples, we have recently shown that 24-h exposure of rat ␤-cells to 10 mmol/l glucose increases mRNA encoding both subunits of the K⫹ATP channels (SUR1 and Kir6.2) (16), whereas at the same time, mRNA encoding the Rab-geranylgeranyl transferase is reduced compared with cells cultured in 3 mmol/l glucose (D.F., V. Berger, M. Kruhoeffer, T. Orntoft, D.P., F.S., unpublished data). The number and identity of genes undergoing glucose regulation in ␤-cells is not yet known, but knowledge in this field is expanding rapidly (16 –18; D.F., V. Berger, M. Kruhoeffer, T. Orntoft, D.P., F.S., unpublished data). In pioneering studies, Collins et al. (19,20) analyzed via two-dimensional gel electrophoresis 35S-methionine– labeled proteins extracted from whole islets that were exposed in vivo or in vitro to either low or high glucose. Using this technique, ⬃2,000 different islet protein spots were identified. From this pool of islet proteins, ⬃1.5% was reported to be regulated by glucose in the physiological concentration range (20). Assuming that the total number of proteins that are expressed in ␤-cells may be as high as 10,000, the number of glucose-regulated proteins DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

may exceed a few hundred. The need to identify such large numbers of genes involved has shifted research efforts from the “classical” candidate gene approach to representational difference analysis (differential display [18]) or microarrays allowing gene expression analysis (16,17; D.F., V. Berger, M. Kruhoeffer, T. Orntoft, D.P., F.S., unpublished data). Although the candidate gene approach has given useful insights with respect to regulation of insulin (21,22), IAPP (23,24), PC1/3 (25), GLUT2 (26), GAD65 (27), and IA-2 (28) genes, it will not allow full comprehension of the scale and details of a glucose-regulated gene network. The prediction that glucose probably regulates hundreds of ␤-cell genes is borne out of a recent large-scale mRNA expression analysis. The possibility of undertaking such screening depended on high-density microarrays, allowing the measurement of thousands of different transcripts in one particular sample. Using the glucose-responsive murine ␤-cell line MIN6, Webb et al. (17) identified 75 transcripts from which abundance was regulated by altering the glucose concentration in the culture medium from 5.5 to 25 mmol/l. Following a similar approach in primary cultures of fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)purified rat ␤-cells, our laboratory recently identified more than 150 glucose-regulated transcripts for which abundance depended on the glucose concentration (3 vs. 10 mmol/l) during the 24-h tissue culture (16; D.F., V. Berger, M. Kruhoeffer, T. Orntoft, D.P., F.S., unpublished data). Messenger RNAs that were more abundant in G10 cells than in G3 cells (n ⫽ 76) and transcripts with a higher abundance in cells cultured at 3 mmol/l glucose (n ⫽ 103) could be classified into several functional groups (Fig. 1). The glucose-upregulated transcripts encode a number of proteins from which expression was previously reported to be glucose dependent in the candidate gene approach. Examples are both preproinsulins (21), the prohormone convertase PC1/3 (25), the glucose transporter GLUT2 (26), and the major ␤-cell autoantigens GAD65 (27) and IA-2 (28). The analysis of MIN6 (17) and the FACS-purified ␤-cell genes (16) was performed with Affymetrix mouse/ S327

GLUCOSE-REGULATED GENES IN PANCREATIC ␤-CELLS

FIG. 2. Time-dependent loss of the glucose-responsive insulin secretory state by culture in low glucose or high glucose plus cycloheximide. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (10 ␮mol/l) caused a time-dependent decline of the insulin secretory response to a 30-min stimulation with 10 mmol/l glucose (G10) plus 10 nmol/l glucagon-like peptide 1 when added to the culture medium in the presence of 10 mmol/l glucose (f). Cells cultured at 3 mmol/l glucose (G3) (E) are shown in comparison. Control cells (F) were cultured in medium containing 10 mmol/l glucose without cycloheximide. Means ⴞ SE of five experiments are shown. *P < 0.05 vs. control cells.

rat A arrays that cover only part of all genes in these murine genomes. Consequently, it can be predicted that the number of glucose-regulated transcripts in ␤-cells may be a lot higher than currently reported. AN OPTIMAL GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION IS REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE GLUCOSE-REGULATED INSULIN SECRETORY STATE

The phenotype of differentiated ␤-cells is remarkable not only for its production, storage, and secretion of insulin, but also for its unique metabolic organization that may be key to the exquisite glucose responsiveness of the cells. Several aspects of glucose metabolism in the ␤-cells have been previously reviewed (29 –32). Studies on FACS-purified rat ␤-cells have contributed to four particular aspects of metabolic organization in these cells: a low hexokinaseover-glucokinase ratio (33), little anaerobic glycolysis (34), a low [ATP]/[ADP] ratio at basal (5 mmol/l) glucose (14), and high rates of anaplerosis/cataplerosis (16,34). As mentioned above, the insulin secretory phenotype of rat ␤-cells to glucose can be maintained chronically in tissue culture if a glucose concentration of 10 mmol/l is present (7). Both lowering (6 mmol/l) and augmenting (20 mmol/l) the glucose concentration during the culture period resulted in a marked loss of the capacity of the cells to synthesize, store, and secrete insulin upon further acute glucose stimulation (7). ␤-Cells can also be dedifferentiated by chronic hyperglycemia in vivo (10), strongly indicating that this phenomenon is not an artifact of the in vitro S328

serum-free culture system. Similar effects can be obtained by exposing ␤-cells for at least 2 h to either low (3 mmol/l) glucose (16) (Fig. 2) or high glucose in the presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (35) (Fig. 2). From these results, it seems likely that the observed changes in the ␤ phenotype (shift from a glucose-responsive to a glucose-unresponsive state) are linked to an altered presence of at least one critical (regulatory or effector) protein for which function is required for insulin secretion. To explore this possibility, we performed twodimensional gel electrophoresis of 35S-methionine–labeled proteins synthesized over 4 h at 10 mmol/l glucose in FACS-purified rat ␤-cells after 10 days of culture in 6, 10, or 20 mmol/l glucose (Fig. 3). In these conditions, the amount of total protein synthesized per ␤-cell increased from 7.6 ⫾ 2.5 cpm/␤-cell at 6 mmol/l glucose preculture to 13.9 ⫾ 4.0 cpm/␤-cell at 10 mmol/l glucose preculture and remained the same (12.7 ⫾ 6.0 cpm/␤-cell) after culture in 20 mmol/l glucose (mean ⫾ SE; n ⫽ 3). Laser densitometric scanning of spot intensities could distinguish between several different patterns of glucose regulation. A first pattern, concentration-dependent upregulation by glucose (6 –20 mmol/l), was obtained for the proinsulin 2 protein (marked “a” in Fig. 3). Intensity of the two combined proinsulin 2 spots (localized in two-dimensional gels of immunoprecipitated extracts; data not shown) was increased sixfold between 6 and 10 mmol/l glucose and another 2.7-fold between 10 and 20 mmol/l glucose culture. The second pattern exhibited an optimum glucose concentration (10 mmol/l) for translation and lower 35S-incorporation in cells cultured at 6 or 20 mmol/l glucose. This pattern is exemplified by four 82-kDa proteins (labeled “b” in Fig. 3) from which synthesis was between 2.5- and 4-fold higher at 10 mmol/l glucose culture than in the other two culture conditions. This expression pattern is of potential interest because it coincides with the apparent optimal glucose level to maintain the differentiated state of primary ␤-cells both in tissue culture (7–9) and in vivo (10,11). A third pattern (illustrated by “c” in Fig. 3) shows suppression of translation when the culture glucose concentration increases. The experimental setup did not allow further mass spectrometric analysis. Nevertheless, these data underline the point (7) that the protein biosynthetic activity of ␤-cells depends on the glucose concentration to which the cells are chronically exposed. The shift in phenotype (7) seems to be the result of a change in the type of protein that is synthesized, which in turn depends on the mRNA profile of the cells. In our analysis of 24-h glucose-regulated transcripts in FACS-purified rat ␤-cells (16), we observed that most of the 76 transcripts for which abundance was higher after culture in 10 mmol/l glucose encode proteins that are related to specialized ␤-cell function (Fig. 1). Examples are enzymes of glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolism (23 transcripts) as well as proteins involved in regulated insulin synthesis and secretion (12 transcripts upregulated), signaling proteins (13 upregulated in 10 mmol/l glucose), and channels/transporters (8 upregulated). On the contrary, most of the 103 transcripts for which abundance was higher after culture in 3 mmol/l glucose encode proteins involved in general cellular maintenance, repair, protein synthesis/degradation, transcription, and RNA DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

F. SCHUIT AND ASSOCIATES

FIG. 3. Effect of chronic glucose concentration on protein synthesis in rat ␤-cells. Rat FACS-purified ␤-cells were cultured for 10 days in HAM’s F-10 medium containing 6, 10, and 20 mmol/l glucose, after which the cells were labeled for 4 h in the presence of 10 mmol/l glucose and 35S-methionine. Samples of newly synthesized proteins from the cell lysates (106 cpm per gel; corresponding to 4.5, 2.5, and 2.0 ⴛ 104 cells, respectively) were separated via two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using precast Immobiline DryStrip gels (pH range 4 –7) for the first dimension and precast ExcelGel SDS gels (gradient 8 –18%) for the second dimension. Gels were exposed to autoradiographic films (␤-max Hyperfilm; Amersham, Bucks, U.K.) for 60 h at room temperature. Spot intensities were quantified using a laser densitometer (Ultroscan XL; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and Gelscan XL Software. Intensity of the two spots in area “a” [coinciding with (pro)insulin 2] was upregulated more than 10-fold between 6 and 20 mmol/l glucose. The four upper spots in area “b” (molecular weight ⬃82 kDa) were maximally expressed at 10 mmol/l glucose. Several spots in “c” represent proteins for which synthesis was suppressed by culture in 10 or 20 mmol/l glucose.

DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

splicing. To further study the functional role of these glucose-regulated transcripts in rat ␤-cells, we recently concentrated on two gene clusters that appear involved in the triggering and amplifying pathway of glucose-induced insulin release (16). For the triggering pathway, we observed higher expression of GLUT2, suppression of inactivating kinase of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, and upregulation of several subunits of the respiratory chain (16). These changes correlated to higher rates of glucose oxidation. Moreover, transcripts encoding both subunits (SUR1 and Kir6.2) of the K⫹ATP channels and the calcium sensor calmodulin were more abundant in cells cultured at 10 mmol/l glucose. In the same study, we reported that expression of multiple genes involved in cataplerosis, the export of mitochondrial metabolites into the cytosol for the production of lipid intermediates, was higher in cells cultured at 10 mmol/l glucose than at 3 mmol/l glucose (16). The identified transcripts encode the first common step, ATP-citrate lyase, several enzymes of fatty acid synthesis and desaturation, and cholesterol or isoprene biosynthesis. These changes correlated well with enhanced abundance of the transcription factor ADD1 (SREBP1c) (36) as well as with enhanced rates of incorporation of 14C-labeled carbon from glucose into hydrophobic molecules that could be extracted from the cells. The functional importance of the ATP-citrate lyase reaction for maintaining stimulated insulin release was documented using two pharmacological inhibitors, radicicol and (⫺)-hydroxycitrate, which abrogated part of the acute secretory capacity of the cells (16). These data support the idea (37) that cataplerosis is important to maintain the functional state of the ␤-cells. In contrast to the well-defined triggering pathway of insulin release (1,38), the molecular targets and precise signaling molecules involved in cataplerosis remain poorly understood. They can vary from increased metabolic flux through various NADPH-generating cycles such as the citrate/pyruvate and citrate/malate cycles. It was previously estimated (34,39 – 41) that pyruvate carboxylation accounts for a high percentage of total pyruvate metabolism in ␤-cells. What fraction of carboxylated pyruvate serves to feed citrate/pyruvate and citrate/malate cycles may become clear by following a novel nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic approach (41). Interestingly, ␤-cells cultured in 10 mmol/l glucose simultaneously upregulate expression of ATP-citrate lyase and downregulate expression of isocitrate dehydrogenase (16), an enzyme that would draw citrate substrate away from the two above-mentioned cycles. Alternatively, the cataplerotic flux through the ATP-citrate lyase reaction can serve primarily to generate building blocks for membrane biogenesis, which most likely will be enhanced under conditions of increased insulin biosynthesis, processing, and exocytosis. Balancing the relative contribution of fatty acid unsaturation and cholesterol production would affect significant functional membrane variables such as lipid raft density, membrane fluidity, or protein lipidation (42– 44). The produced long-chain acyl-CoAs may also play a role in signaling as direct metabolic precursors of diacylglycerol, an activator of protein kinase C, or eicosanoids. Finally, it is conceivable that amplification effects are generated at the level of an integrated transcriptional S329

GLUCOSE-REGULATED GENES IN PANCREATIC ␤-CELLS

FIG. 4. Molecular pathways of glucoseregulated gene expression. Multiple regulatory pathways can alter the concentration and/or the activity of transcription factors (TFs) when glucose stimulates ␤-cells. For an explanation, see MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF GLUCOSEREGULATED GENE EXPRESSION IN ␤-CELLS.

response because glucose metabolism not only induces the synthesis of transcription factors that promote lipogenic gene expression (16), it generates (still unknown) ligands for various nuclear receptors (for example, the HNF family). MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF GLUCOSE-REGULATED GENE EXPRESSION IN ␤-CELLS

Relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms that are involved in glucose regulation of ␤-cell gene expression. Over the past decades, insight into control of mammalian insulin gene expression has markedly progressed, both at the level of gene transcription (45) and at post-transcriptional steps (46); therefore, this information can be taken as a paradigm of glucose-regulated genes in ␤-cells. Unraveling the daunting complexity of the regulatory network of metabolites, signaling molecules, kinases/ phosphatases, and transcription factors (Fig. 4) seems to be a formidable task for one gene and almost impossible for a whole network of interacting genes. At the transcriptional level, glucose metabolism can alter gene expression directly by (in)activation of proteins that are already bound to the preinitiation complex on the gene promoter. This may be achieved via kinases/phosphatases that sense the abundance of metabolic flux in the ␤-cells or the overall energy status of the cell. Some of the (in)activation pathways may depend on glucose-induced influx of calcium in the cells (which triggers activation of calciumdependent kinases and phosphatases) or, even more S330

indirectly, on glucose activation of insulin release and insulin interactions with insulin receptors on ␤-cells (Fig. 4). Changes in the concentration of the transcription factor protein in the nucleus can be obtained via translocation of existing molecules or glucose-induced changes in the balance between synthesis and degradation of transcription factors. A leverage effect can be obtained for transcription factors encoded by glucose-responsive genes because of the overall stimulatory effect of glucose on the translation rate of produced mRNA (3,4). An interesting example of interacting kinases in glucosestimulated gene expression is found in the L-type pyruvate kinase gene, which is nutrient responsive in ␤-cells (47) and in liver (48). The molecular mechanism that is involved has been studied in most detail in liver tissue (48 –50). Transcription is stimulated by carbohydrate response element binding protein (48) via mechanisms involving both cAMP-mediated phosphorylation (49) and inactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase (50). It was suggested that glucose-dependent transcription of the L-type pyruvate kinase gene in MIN6 cells also depends on inactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase because the henomenon can be suppressed by the AMP analog 5aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AICA)-riboside and mimicked by intracellular injection of antibodies directed against the AMP-activated protein kinase ␣-2 or ␤-2 chains (51). An example of glucose regulation of gene expression via signaling pathways involving elevated intracellular calcium has recently been documented for the insulin gene DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

F. SCHUIT AND ASSOCIATES

(52). Synergism between glucose (nutrient stimulation) and cAMP (glucagon-like peptide 1 stimulation) at the level of insulin gene expression was reported to integrate at the level of nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT). Studies with the calcineurin inhibitor FK506 and the calcium chelator BAPTA further suggest that the transcriptional response requires activation of calcineurin, a Ca2⫹-calmodulin– dependent protein phosphatase. A long signaling loop can be proposed in which high extracellular glucose elevates intracellular calcium, stimulates exocytosis, raises extracellular insulin, and causes insulin activation of receptors on ␤-cells (Fig. 4). It has been suggested (6) that such a signaling loop contributes in a rapid manner to the glucose-induced pool of preproinsulin mRNA in the ␤-cell. The fast-time kinetics of this process seem to some extent contradictory with earlier observations (53). This potentially interesting novel observation suggests that insulin action on ␤-cells contributes to the glucose-induced transcriptional response to glucose. This finding could explain why mice with ␤-cell–specific disruption of insulin receptor gene expression have defects in glucoseinduced insulin release and diabetes (54). Glucose not only alters transcription of many genes but also accelerates the translation of existing transcripts. This was first demonstrated for proinsulin mRNA (4,5,53). It is possible that glucose effects on overall rates of translation require direct intervention of metabolite(s), nutrient-derived signals or second messengers, or kinases/ phosphatases at the level of the ribosome. The nature of these signals is yet unknown. The preferential translation of preproinsulin mRNA over that of other ␤-cell mRNAs (3) was proposed to depend on glucose-dependent relief of the signal peptide recognition particle (SRP)-mediated arrest of elongation (5). Alternatively, it may be linked to interactions with (still poorly characterized) proteins on the 3⬘ and 5⬘ untranslated regions of the transcript (55). Translational effects of glucose on ␤-cells could also interact with the long signaling loop that is outlined in Fig. 4, which requires the activation of insulin receptors, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinases, and protein kinase B. This pathway has been shown in other mammalian cell types to require the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which activates the initiation factor eIF-4E by phosphorylation of its binding protein 4E-BP1 (56). In line with this idea, rat islets exposed to glucose exhibit rapid phosphorylation of 4E-BP1, which could be mimicked by adding exogenous insulin and could be suppressed by rapamycin (57). In summary, a new area of ␤-cell research is rapidly unfolding. The behavior of large groups of genes under different conditions of ␤-cell stimulation can be studied in vitro using relatively low amounts of RNA. So far, this approach has been used for the study of glucose effects on the mRNA profile of rodent ␤-cells. When applied to human ␤-cells from nondiabetic and diabetic pancreases, a novel strategy for drug discovery can be planned by identifying innovating targets for pharmacological intervention in ␤-cells. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grant 9.0130.99 from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO Vlaanderen), DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002

the Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Departement Onderwijs (Geconcerteerde Onderzoeksactie 1807), and the Belgian Program on Interuniversity Poles of Attraction, initiated by the Belgian State (IUAP-PAI). The authors thank E. Quartier and V. Berger for valuable technical support. REFERENCES 1. Henquin JC: Triggering and amplifying pathways of regulation of insulin secretion by glucose. Diabetes 49:1751–1760, 2000 2. Bratanova-Tochkova TK, Cheng H, Daniel S, Gunawardana S, Liu YJ, Mulvaney-Musa J, Schermerhorn T, Straub SG, Yajima H, Sharp GW: Triggering and augmentation mechanisms, granule pools, and biphasic insulin secretion. Diabetes 51 (Suppl. 1):S83–S90, 2002 3. Schuit FC, In’t Veld PA, Pipeleers DG: Glucose stimulates proinsulin biosynthesis by a dose-dependent recruitment of pancreatic beta cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:3865–3869, 1988 4. Permutt MA: Effect of glucose on initiation and elongation rates in isolated rat pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 249:2738 –2742, 1974 5. Welsh M, Scherberg N, Gilmore R, Steiner DF: Translational control of insulin biosynthesis: evidence for regulation of elongation, initiation and signal-recognition-particle-mediated translational arrest by glucose. Biochem J 235:459 – 467, 1986 6. Leibiger B, Wahlander K, Berggren PO, Leibiger IB: Glucose-stimulated insulin biosynthesis depends on insulin-stimulated insulin gene transcription. J Biol Chem 275:30153–30156, 2000 7. Ling Z, Kiekens R, Mahler T, Schuit FC, Pipeleers-Marichal M, Sener A, Kloppel G, Malaisse WJ, Pipeleers DG: Effects of chronically elevated glucose levels on the functional properties of rat pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 45:1774 –1782, 1996 8. Hoorens A, Van de Casteele M, Kloppel G, Pipeleers D: Glucose promotes survival of rat pancreatic beta cells by activating synthesis of proteins which suppress a constitutive apoptotic program. J Clin Invest 98:1568 – 1574, 1996 9. Jonas JC, Sharma A, Hasenkamp W, Ilkova H, Patane G, Laybutt R, Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC: Chronic hyperglycemia triggers loss of pancreatic beta cell differentiation in an animal model of diabetes. J Biol Chem 274:14112–14121, 1999 10. Laybutt DR, Sharma A, Sgroi DC, Gaudet J, Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC: Genetic regulation of metabolic pathways in beta-cells disrupted by hyperglycemia. J Biol Chem 277:10912–10921, 2002 11. Weir GC, Laybutt DR, Kaneto H, Bonner-Weir S, Sharma A: Beta-cell adaptation and decompensation during the progression of diabetes. Diabetes 50 (Suppl. 1):S154 –S159, 2001 12. Steil GM, Trivedi N, Jonas JC, Hasenkamp WM, Sharma A, Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC: Adaptation of beta-cell mass to substrate oversupply: enhanced function with normal gene expression. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280:E788 –E796, 2001 13. Bell GI, Polonsky KS: Diabetes mellitus and genetically programmed defects in beta-cell function. Nature 414:788 –791, 2001 14. Detimary P, Dejonghe S, Ling Z, Pipeleers D, Schuit F, Henquin JC: The changes in adenine nucleotides measured in glucose-stimulated rodent islets occur in beta cells but not in alpha cells and are also observed in human islets. J Biol Chem 273:33905–33908, 1998 15. Lang J: Molecular mechanisms and regulation of insulin exocytosis as a paradigm of endocrine secretion. Eur J Biochem 259:3–17, 1999 16. Flamez D, Berger V, Kruhoffer M, Orntoft T, Pipeleers D, Schuit FC: Critical role for cataplerosis via citrate in glucose-regulated insulin release. Diabetes 51:2018 –2024, 2002 17. Webb GC, Akbar MS, Zhao C, Steiner DF: Expression profiling of pancreatic beta cells: glucose regulation of secretory and metabolic pathway genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5773–5778, 2000 18. Minami K, Yano H, Miki T, Nagashima K, Wang CZ, Tanaka H, Miyazaki JI, Seino S: Insulin secretion and differential gene expression in glucoseresponsive and -unresponsive MIN6 sublines. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 279:E773–E781, 2000 19. Collins HW, Buettger C, Matschinsky F: High-resolution two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis reveals a glucose-response protein of 65 kDa in pancreatic islet cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:5494 –5498, 1990 20. Collins H, Najafi H, Buettger C, Rombeau J, Settle RG, Matschinsky FM: Identification of glucose response proteins in two biological models of beta-cell adaptation to chronic high glucose exposure. J Biol Chem 267:1357–1366, 1992 S331

GLUCOSE-REGULATED GENES IN PANCREATIC ␤-CELLS

21. Ling Z, Heimberg H, Foriers A, Schuit F, Pipeleers D: Differential expression of rat insulin I and II messenger ribonucleic acid after prolonged exposure of islet beta-cells to elevated glucose levels. Endocrinology 139:491– 495, 1998 22. Shushan EB, Cerasi E, Melloul D: Regulation of the insulin gene by glucose: stimulation of trans-activation potency of human PDX-1 Nterminal domain. DNA Cell Biol 18:471– 479, 1999 23. Hou X, Ling Z, Quartier E, Foriers A, Schuit F, Pipeleers D, Van Schravendijk C: Prolonged exposure of pancreatic beta cells to raised glucose concentrations results in increased cellular content of islet amyloid polypeptide precursors. Diabetologia 42:188 –194, 1999 24. Ding WQ, Holicky E, Miller LJ: Glucose and forskolin regulate IAPP gene expression through different signal transduction pathways. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E938 –E945, 2001 25. Alarcon C, Lincoln B, Rhodes CJ: The biosynthesis of the subtilisin-related proprotein convertase PC3, but no that of the PC2 convertase, is regulated by glucose in parallel to proinsulin biosynthesis in rat pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 268:4276 – 4280, 1993 26. Ferrer J, Gomis R, Fernandez Alvarez J, Casamitjana R, Vilardell E: Signals derived from glucose metabolism are required for glucose regulation of pancreatic islet GLUT2 mRNA and protein. Diabetes 42:1273–1280, 1993 27. Hao W, Li L, Mehta V, Lernmark A, Palmer JP: Functional state of the beta cell affects expression of both forms of glutamic acid decarboxylase. Pancreas 9:558 –562, 1994 28. Seissler J, Nguyen TB, Aust G, Steinbrenner H, Scherbaum WA: Regulation of the diabetes-associated autoantigen IA-2 in INS-1 pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 49:1137–1141, 2000 29. Newgard CB, McGarry JD: Metabolic coupling factors in pancreatic beta-cell signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 64:689 –719, 1995 30. Deeney JT, Prentki M, Corkey BE: Metabolic control of beta-cell function. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:267–275, 2000 31. Maechler P, Wollheim CB: Mitochondrial function in normal and diabetic beta-cells. Nature 414:807– 812, 2001 32. Rutter GA: Nutrient-secretion coupling in the pancreatic islet beta-cell: recent advances. Mol Aspects Med 22:247–284, 2001 33. Schuit F, Moens K, Heimberg H, Pipeleers D: Cellular origin of hexokinase in pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 274:32803–32809, 1999 34. Schuit F, De Vos A, Farfari S, Moens K, Pipeleers D, Brun T, Prentki M: Metabolic fate of glucose in purified islet cells: glucose-regulated anaplerosis in beta cells. J Biol Chem 272:18572–18579, 1997 35. Garcia-Barrado MJ, Ravier MA, Rolland JF, Gilon P, Nenquin M, Henquin JC: Inhibition of protein synthesis sequentially impairs distinct steps of stimulus-secretion coupling in pancreatic beta cells. Endocrinology 142: 299 –307, 2001 36. Foretz M, Pacot C, Dugail I, Lemarchand P, Guichard C, Le Liepvre X, Berthelier-Lubrano C, Spiegelman B, Kim JB, Ferre P, Foufelle F: ADD1/ SREBP-1c is required in the activation of hepatic lipogenic gene expression by glucose. Mol Cell Biol 19:3760 –3768, 1999 37. Farfari S, Schulz V, Corkey B, Prentki M: Glucose-regulated anaplerosis and cataplerosis in pancreatic beta-cells: possible implication of a pyruvate/citrate shuttle in insulin secretion. Diabetes 49:718 –726, 2000 38. Aguilar-Bryan L, Clement JP 4th, Gonzalez G, Kunjilwar K, Babenko A, Bryan J: Toward understanding the assembly and structure of KATP channels. Physiol Rev 78:227–245, 1998 39. Khan A, Ling ZC, Landau BR: Quantifying the carboxylation of pyruvate in pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 271:2539 –2542, 1996 40. MacDonald MJ: Estimates of glycolysis, pyruvate (de)carboxylation, pentose phosphate pathway, and methyl succinate metabolism in incapacitated pancreatic islets. Arch Biochem Biophys 305:205–214, 1993

S332

41. Lu D, Mulder H, Zhao P, Burgess SC, Jensen MV, Kamzolova S, Newgard CB, Sherry AD: 13C NMR isotopomer analysis reveals a connection between pyruvate cycling and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:2708 –2713, 2002 42. Simons K, Toomre D: Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1:31–39, 2000 43. Kim YC, Ntambi JM: Regulation of stearoyl-CoA desaturase genes: role in cellular metabolism and preadipocyte differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 266:1– 4, 1999 44. Deeney JT, Gromada J, Hoy M, Olsen HL, Rhodes CJ, Prentki M, Berggren PO, Corkey BE: Acute stimulation with long chain acyl-CoA enhances exocytosis in insulin-secreting cells (HIT T-15 and NMRI beta-cells). J Biol Chem 275:9363–9368, 2000 45. Melloul D, Marshak S, Cerasi E: Regulation of insulin gene transcription. Diabetologia 45:309 –326, 2002 46. Goodge KA, Hutton JC: Translational regulation of proinsulin biosynthesis and proinsulin conversion in the pancreatic beta-cell. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:235–242, 2000 47. Kennedy HJ, Viollet B, Rafiq I, Kahn A, Rutter GA: Upstream stimulatory factor-2 (USF2) activity is required for glucose stimulation of L-pyruvate kinase promoter activity in single living islet beta-cells. J Biol Chem 272:20636 –20640, 1997 48. Yamashita H, Takenoshita M, Sakurai M, Bruick RK, Henzel WJ, Shillinglaw W, Arnot D, Uyeda K: A glucose-responsive transcription factor that regulates carbohydrate metabolism in the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9116 –9121, 2001 49. Kawaguchi T, Takenoshita M, Kabashima T, Uyeda K: Glucose and cAMP regulate the L-type pyruvate kinase gene by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the carbohydrate response element binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:13710 –13715, 2001 50. Kawaguchi T, Osatomi K, Yamashita H, Kabashima T, Uyeda K: Mechanism for fatty acid “sparing” effect on glucose-induced transcription: regulation of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein by AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 277:3829 –3835, 2002 51. da Silva Xavier G, Leclerc I, Salt IP, Doiron B, Hardie DG, Kahn A, Rutter GA: Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation by glucose of islet beta cell gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4023– 4028, 2000 52. Lawrence MC, Bhatt HS, Easom RA: NFAT regulates insulin gene promoter activity in response to synergistic pathways induced by glucose and glucagon-like peptide-1. Diabetes 51:691– 698, 2002 53. Itoh N, Okamoto H: Translational control of proinsulin synthesis by glucose. Nature 283:100 –102, 1980 54. Kulkarni RN, Bruning JC, Winnay JN, Postic C, Magnuson MA, Kahn CR: Tissue-specific knockout of the insulin receptor in pancreatic beta cells creates an insulin secretory defect similar to that in type 2 diabetes. Cell 96:329 –339, 1999 55. Wicksteed B, Herbert TP, Alarcon C, Lingohr MK, Moss LG, Rhodes CJ: Cooperativity between the preproinsulin mRNA untranslated regions is necessary for glucose-stimulated translation. J Biol Chem 276:22553– 22558, 2001 56. Proud CG, Wang X, Patel JV, Campbell LE, Kleijn M, Li W, Browne GJ: Interplay between insulin and nutrients in the regulation of translation factors. Biochem Soc Trans 29:541–547, 2001 57. Xu G, Marshall CA, Lin TA, Kwon G, Munivenkatappa RB, Hill JR, Lawrence JC Jr, McDaniel ML: Insulin mediates glucose-stimulated phosphorylation of PHAS-I by pancreatic beta cells: an insulin-receptor mechanism for autoregulation of protein synthesis by translation. J Biol Chem 273:4485– 4491, 1998

DIABETES, VOL. 51, SUPPLEMENT 3, DECEMBER 2002