High-resolution profiles of gene expression and DNA methylation ...

2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Mar 31, 2017 - also by the appropriate balance between mitochondrial fission and ... that mitochondrial dysfunction may be the determining factor of impaired ...
Advance Publication by J-STAGE Journal of Reproduction and Development

Accepted for publication: February 16, 2017 Published online: March 31, 2017



High-resolution profiles of gene expression and DNA methylation highlight mitochondrial



modifications during early embryonic development



Likun Ren1)*, Chao Zhang1)*, Li Tao1)*, Jing Hao1), Kun Tan1), Kai Miao1), Yong Yu1), Linlin Sui1),



Zhonghong Wu1), Jianhui Tian 1), Lei An1)



1) Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture,



National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology,



China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P. R. China



* Likun Ren and Chao Zhang contributed equally to this work.



Running head: Mitochondrial modifications in embryos

10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25 

Corresponding author: Lei An (email: [email protected])  

26 

Abstract

27 

Well-organized mitochondrial functions and dynamics are critical for early embryonic development

28 

and are operated via a large number of mitochondria-related genes (MtGs) encoded by both the

29 

nuclear and the mitochondrial genome. However, the mechanisms underlying mitochondrial

30 

modifications during the critical window between blastocyst implantation and postimplantation

31 

organogenesis are poorly understood. Herein, we performed high-resolution dynamic profiling of

32 

MtGs to acquire a more detailed understanding of mitochondrial modifications during early

33 

development. Our data suggest that the resumption of mitochondrial mass growth is not only

34 

facilitated by increased mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication, but

35 

also by the appropriate balance between mitochondrial fission and fusion. In addition, increased levels

36 

of reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from enhanced mitochondrial functions may be the critical

37 

inducer for activating the glutathione (GSH)-based stress response system in early embryos. The

38 

appropriate balance between the mitochondrial stress response and apoptosis appears to be significant

39 

for cell differentiation and early organogenesis. Furthermore, we found that most MtGs undergo de

40 

novo promoter methylation, which may have functional consequences on mitochondrial functions and

41 

dynamics during early development. We also report that mtDNA methylation can be observed as early

42 

as soon after implantation. DNMT1, the predominant enzyme for maintaining DNA methylation,

43 

localized to the mitochondria and bound to mtDNA by the implantation stage. Our study provides a

44 

new insight into the involvement of mitochondria in early mammalian embryogenesis. We also

45 

propose that the epigenetic modifications during early development are significant for modulating

46 

mitochondrial functions and dynamics.

47 

Key words: Mitochondria, Early embryos, Reactive oxygen species, Glutathione, DNA methylation

48 

 

49 

Introduction

50 

Mitochondria not only provide the energy required to maintain cellular survival and growth but

51 

also participate in a number of pathways that maintain cellular homeostasis, including ion homeostasis,

52 

amino acid metabolism, glycolysis, fatty acid metabolism, signal transduction, and apoptosis [1].

53 

Well-organized mitochondrial dynamics and functions are of prime importance for early embryonic

54 

development. During the period between the blastocyst and the postimplantation stages, which

55 

overlaps with implantation and organogenesis initiation, the mitochondrion undergoes dramatic

56 

modifications, including mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication, a

57 

shift from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, and changes in the mitochondrial ultrastructure [2]. These

58 

mitochondrial modifications are essential for successful implantation and survival. However, the

59 

comprehensive mechanism underlying mitochondrial dynamics during this critical developmental

60 

period remains largely elusive.

61 

The orchestrated mitochondrial functions and dynamics are highly regulated by both the nuclear

62 

(nDNA) and mitochondrial genomes (nuclear-mitochondrial cross-talk). In addition to the 37

63 

mtDNA-encoded genes, it is estimated that approximately 1200 proteins encoded by nDNA can enter

64 

the mouse mitochondrial matrix or bind to its membrane [3]. These mitochondria-related genes (MtGs)

65 

have been targeted in high-resolution gene expression analysis to evaluate the involvement of

66 

mitochondrial dysfunctions in cardiac pathology [4] and cancer [5]. Recently, our own studies

67 

suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction may be the determining factor of impaired development of

68 

in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos through disturbed oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), reduced

69 

mitochondrial biogenesis, and dysregulated responses to oxidative stress [6].

70 

In this study, we performed a dynamic high-resolution expression profiling of MtGs during early

71 

embryonic development, using samples from E3.5 blastocysts, epiblasts from E7.5 embryos (E7.5

72 

epiblasts), and E10.5 embryos. The targeted profiling of a specific gene set leads to a more efficient

73 

enrichment of the involved mitochondrial functions, thereby providing a more detailed and

74 

comprehensive understanding of mitochondrial dynamics and functions during early development.

 

75 

In addition to the expression profiling, we also highlighted the DNA methylation dynamics of

76 

MtGs for the period between the blastocyst and the postimplantation stages. One of the most important

77 

epigenetic events during this critical developmental period is the re-establishment of DNA methylation

78 

patterns, termed de novo DNA methylation. The progression of this. epigenetic event highly coincides

79 

with the mitochondrial modifications taking place by the implantation stage, such as the ‘embryonic

80 

shift’ from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism and the resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis. In

81 

addition, previous studies demonstrated that the DNA methylation status of nDNA-encoded MtGs

82 

underlies tissue- or cell type-dependent mitochondrial functions and dynamics [7, 8] as well as

83 

mitochondrial pathology [9-11]. These facts lead us to investigate whether de novo DNA methylation

84 

may play a regulatory role in the mitochondria during early development.

85 

Materials and Methods

86 

Animal preparation

87 

F1 female mice (ICR, 5–6 weeks old) and F1 male mice (ICR, 8–9 weeks old) were fed ad

88 

libitum and housed in a room with a controlled light cycle (12L:12D). F1 females were naturally

89 

mated with F1 males. All studies were specifically approved by and performed in accordance with the

90 

guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University. 

91 

Embryo preparation and collection

92 

The criteria for sampling embryos were based on developmental progress and morphology.

93 

Embryos showing typical morphological features according to the well-established landmarks [12]

94 

were sampled for further analyses. All sampled embryos for RNA and DNA isolation were serially

95 

washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; GIBCO, Life Technologies, NY, USA) and immediately

96 

stored in liquid nitrogen for future use. In addition, to avoid cross-contamination between embryonic

97 

and extraembryonic tissues, we controlled the efficiency of the dissection procedure by detecting the

98 

expression of markers specific to the extraembryonic ectoderm (ETS-related transcription factor, Elf5),

99 

ectoplacental cone (Achaete-scute like 2, ASCL2, also known as Mash2), and epiblasts (fibroblast

100 

growth factor 5, Fgf5) at E7.5 [13].

 

101 

In vitro fertilization and culture

102 

To generate in vitro fertilized embryos, female ICR mice were superovulated by an

103 

intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 5 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Ningbo Hormone

104 

Product Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China), followed by an i.p. injection of 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin

105 

(hCG; Ningbo Hormone Product Co., Ltd.) 48 h later. At 14 h after hCG treatment, cumulus-enclosed

106 

oocyte complexes were recovered from oviducts and cumulus cells were removed by digestion with

107 

hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3–5 min. The oocytes were rinsed in human

108 

tubal fluid (HTF) medium (Sage, Bedminster, NJ, USA), and placed into 60 μl drops of HTF medium

109 

covered with paraffin oil, before being equilibrated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Sperm was

110 

collected from the cauda epididymis and capacitated for 1 h in HTF medium at 37°C and 5% CO2.

111 

Oocytes were inseminated 15 h post-hCG with 106 spermatozoa. After 4 h in the incubator, oocytes

112 

and zygotes were washed several times in potassium simplex optimization medium containing amino

113 

acids (KSOM + AA; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and then transferred to 60 µl drops of KSOM

114 

medium. The zygotes, determined by the presence of two pronuclei, were cultured to the blastocyst

115 

stage at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Well-developed late-cavitating blastocysts of similar

116 

morphology were sampled at 106–112 h post-hCG after culturing in KSOM medium [14].

117 

Pseudopregnant female mice were mated with vasectomized males 3.5 days prior to embryo transfer.

118 

Twelve IVF blastocysts were transferred to a single recipient, with six embryos placed in each uterine

119 

horn.

120 

High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and biological analysis

121 

Total RNAs were extracted from embryos at different stages with the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen,

122 

Carlsbad, CA, USA). Polyadenylated RNAs were isolated using the Oligotex mRNA Midi Kit (Qiagen,

123 

Valencia, CA, USA). The RNA-seq libraries were constructed using the SOLiD Whole Transcriptome

124 

Analysis Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the standard protocol and

125 

sequenced on the SOLiD platform (Applied Biosystems) to generate high-quality single-end reads.

126 

The raw reads were aligned to genome sequences, trimming off a nucleotide from each of the 5′ and 3′

 

127 

ends and allowing up to two mismatches. Reads mapped to multiple locations were discarded and only

128 

uniquely mapped reads were used for the subsequent analysis. Gene expression levels were measured

129 

in reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (RPKM). A single pooling strategy for

130 

relatively large sample sizes was used, as described previously [15, 16].

131 

DAVID v6.7 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) was used to annotate biological themes (gene

132 

ontology, GO). REVIGO analysis (http://revigo.irb.hr) was also performed to visualize the interactive

133 

relationship among enriched processes. The KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg) was used to

134 

determine the associated pathways. Data on MtGs were fed into STRING (http://string.embl.de) to

135 

build an interaction network. The phenotype annotations of MtGs were analyzed based on the Mouse

136 

Genome Informatics (MGI; http://www.informatics.jax.org/phenotypes.shtml) database.

137 

Apoptosis analysis

138 

Collected blastocysts were washed three times with 0.1% PVA/PBS and then transferred to PBS

139 

supplemented with 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and 0.5% Triton X-100 for simultaneous fixation and

140 

permeabilization at 37°C for 45 min. Apoptotic nuclei were detected using the In Situ Cell Death

141 

Detection Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The number of apoptotic nuclei was determined under a

142 

BX51epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

143 

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

144 

Total RNA extraction from embryos was performed using TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s

145 

instructions. Reverse transcription (RT) was carried out using a commercially available first-strand

146 

cDNA synthesis kit (iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit; Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Real-time PCR was

147 

performed in the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR System using SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix

148 

(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Used primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

149 

MtDNA copy number determination by qPCR

150 

The nuclear-encoded β-actin gene and the mitochondria-encoded ND5 gene were used to

151 

determine the mtDNA copy numbers with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1. Standard

152 

curves were constructed using recombinant plasmids that were serially diluted 103–108 times. The

 

153 

mtDNA and nDNA copy numbers were calculated from the threshold cycle number (CT) and

154 

corrected using the standard curve. The overall number of mtDNA copies per cell was calculated using

155 

the following formula: mtDNA copies per cell = ND5 copy number / (β-actin copy number/2).

156 

Measurement of reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG)

157 

The contents of intracellular reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in each

158 

blastocyst were determined using commercially available kits (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) according to

159 

the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was measured at 412 nm using the Infinite M200 PRO

160 

NanoQuant microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Approximately 30 E3.5 blastocysts

161 

and 20 E7.5 epiblasts were used for measurements.

162 

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-sequencing (MeDIP-seq)

163 

Global genomic DNA, including both nDNA and mtDNA, was isolated from embryonic samples

164 

using the DNeasy Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of each DNA

165 

sample with respect to integrity, purity, and concentration was assessed using a DN-1000

166 

Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Genomic DNA was then

167 

fragmented using a Covarias sonication system (Covarias, Woburn, MA, USA). After sonication, the

168 

fragments were denatured to produce single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Following denaturation, the

169 

ssDNA was incubated with antibodies recognizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC). Magnetic beads

170 

conjugated to anti-mouse-IgG were then used to bind the anti-5mC antibodies and unbound DNA was

171 

removed along with the supernatant. Finally, DNA was released by digesting the antibodies with

172 

proteinase K and collected. Sequencing was carried out in 50 bp reads on the Illumina Hiseq 2000

173 

(Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong,

174 

China) following the standard protocol.

175 

MeDIP-qPCR

176 

Global DNA was isolated using the Solar MicroElute Genomic DNA Kit (Solar Technologies Inc.,

177 

Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Sonicated DNA (fragment length: 100–600 bp) was treated with the

178 

EpiQuik MeDIP Ultra Kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA) to enrich methylated DNA fragments.

 

179 

Briefly, samples were precipitated with anti-5-mC, while samples precipitated with non-immunized

180 

IgG served as a negative control. The enriched methylated DNA was quantified by qPCR using

181 

specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) and the enrichment efficiency of MeDIP-qPCR was

182 

measured as fold enrichment (FE) with the following formula: FE (%) = 2(IgG CT –Sample CT) × 100%, as

183 

presented in the product manual.

184 

Results

185 

General dynamic profiling of MtGs during early development

186 

We gathered information for over 1000 MtGs, as reported by Mootha’s study [3], from the

187 

transcriptomic data obtained from E3.5 blastocysts, E7.5 epiblasts, and E10.5 embryos

188 

(Supplementary Table S2). The hierarchical clustering heatmap showed that all MtGs can be sorted

189 

into three main groups based on expression dynamics, namely whether they were most abundant at

190 

E3.5, E7.5, or E10.5. Each group can be further divided into two clusters (Fig. 1A). Compared with

191 

E3.5 blastocysts, E7.5 epiblasts and E10.5 embryos were clustered more tightly, with similar MtG

192 

expression patterns. Functional analysis showed that each cluster was significantly associated with

193 

many aspects of mitochondrial functions or related processes, including OXPHOS, oxoacid and amino

194 

acid metabolism, and apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. 1A), implying that mitochondrial dynamics

195 

during early development are orchestrated via complicated expression patterns involving MtGs

196 

(Supplementary Fig. 1B).

197 

To further explore the involvement of mitochondrial functions and dynamics during early

198 

embryonic development, the expression patterns of MtGs at E3.5, E7.5, and E10.5 were compared

199 

consecutively, i.e., E7.5 versus E3.5 and E10.5 versus E7.5. These two transitions encompass a series

200 

of important developmental events, such as implantation, cellular differentiation, and organogenesis.

201 

In the first transition, i.e., from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts, 920 MtGs displayed significant

202 

changes in expression (P < 0.05), accounting for approximately 80% of identified MtGs. During the

203 

transition from E7.5 epiblasts to E10.5 embryos, the expression of 843 MtGs changed significantly (P

204 

< 0.05), accounting for approximately 73% of identified MtGs. Both percentages were higher than the

 

205 

corresponding values of the global transcriptome, which were approximately 70% and 64%,

206 

respectively (Fig. 1B), implying that expression of MtGs is highly dynamic during early development.

207 

These observations also suggest that mitochondrial features may undergo a more dramatic transition

208 

from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts, in accordance with the results of the hierarchical clustering.

209 

A Venn diagram analysis was performed to screen MtGs consistently up- or downregulated (FC >

210 

2) during the transition E3.5 to E10.5. According to the results of the analysis, 58 MtGs showed

211 

consistent upregulation while 31 MtGs were consistently downregulated (Fig. 1C). Considering that

212 

the expression of these MtGs consistently changed during early development, they may contribute

213 

significantly to the highly dynamic mitochondrial functions taking place during this stage.

214 

Detailed functional profiling of MtGs during early development

215 

To further understand the comprehensive mechanism underlying mitochondrial functions and

216 

dynamics during early development, high-resolution functional profiling was performed for the MtGs

217 

whose expression significantly changed (P < 0.05, FC > 2) during the transition from E3.5 to E7.5

218 

(Supplementary Table S3) as well as from 7.5 to E10.5 (Supplementary Table S4).

219 

GO classification of biological processes indicated that ‘Oxoacid metabolic process’, ‘Coenzyme

220 

metabolic process’, ‘Cellular amine metabolic process’, and ‘Fatty acid metabolic process’ were the

221 

four most significantly enriched terms in the transition from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts,

222 

suggesting that metabolic changes are the most evident feature of mitochondrial modifications during

223 

this period. In addition, ‘Apoptotic mitochondrial changes’ and ‘Response to ROS’ may also be

224 

significantly involved in this transition. Similar processes were enriched in the transition from E7.5

225 

epiblasts to E10.5 embryos (Fig. 2A and B). Next, we performed REVIGO analysis to visualize the

226 

interactive relationship among the enriched processes. Results from both transitions suggest that

227 

‘Transmembrane transport’ may play a key role in regulating mitochondrial metabolism and

228 

mitochondria-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 2C and D).

229 

KEGG pathway analysis provided us with more detailed insights into mitochondrial

230 

modifications. For the transition from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts, the altered mitochondrial

 

231 

energy metabolism included ‘TCA cycle’, ‘OXPHOS’, and ‘Fatty acid β-oxidation’, while the changed

232 

amino acid metabolism involved arginine, proline, valine, leucine, glutamate, and glycine. It should be

233 

noted that some pathways of neurodegenerative diseases, including ‘Alzheimer’s disease (AD)’,

234 

‘Parkinson’s disease (PD)’ and ‘Huntington’s disease (HD)’ were also enriched, mainly because of

235 

MtGs associated with ‘OXPHOS’ and ‘apoptosis’. Likewise, changes in energy metabolism and amino

236 

acid metabolism were also significant during the transition from E7.5 to E10.5 embryos (Table 1).

237 

Using dynamically changed MtGs (P < 0.05, FC > 2) as seed nodes, interaction networks were

238 

constructed. In addition to functional clusters similar to those identified by the GO and KEGG

239 

analyses, other processes or functions, such as ‘mitochondrial translation’ and ‘mitochondrial

240 

biogenesis’, were also significantly clustered. Another interesting observation was that some

241 

well-known genes responsible for the regulation of cell pluripotency and differentiation, such as

242 

members of the MAPK (Mapk8 and Mapk12), WNT (Wnt1 and Wnt3), and SMAD (Smad3 and Smad7)

243 

families, were clustered tightly with other MtGs, suggesting an essential role of mitochondrial

244 

functions in the regulation of pluripotency and differentiation in early embryos (Fig. 2E and F).

245 

Mitochondrial modifications required for successful implantation

246 

The above-mentioned functional profiling revealed that many mitochondrial modifications had

247 

undergone evident temporal changes by the implantation stage. The observed changes in the

248 

expression of some key genes of energy metabolism were in accordance with the ‘embryonic shift’

249 

from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism. Accordingly, MtGs associated with mitochondrial biogenesis

250 

showed changes that may accommodate the enhanced aerobic metabolism. It is noteworthy that the

251 

expression of MtGs underlying GSH biosynthesis and functions changed correspondingly, suggesting

252 

a physiological response to the increased ROS levels resulting from the enhanced mitochondrial

253 

functions (Fig. 3A).

254 

To gain further insight into the comprehensive mechanism underlying the increased

255 

mitochondrial biogenesis and GSH production in early embryonic development, we analyzed the

256 

dynamics of MtGs involved in these processes based on the gene list provided by Quick GO

 

257 

(https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO)

and

Wikipathways

258 

(http://www.wikipathways.org/index.php/WikiPathways). Results showed that the expression of most

259 

of the MtGs associated with these processes correspondingly changed from E3.5 to E7.5 (Fig. 3B).

260 

The changes of some selected MtGs were validated using qRT-PCR (Fig. 3C). Next, to understand the

261 

interactive relationship of these processes, we constructed a small network. This revealed a high level

262 

of association among these processes (Fig. 3D). Indeed, the involvement of mitochondrial biogenesis

263 

and GSH-based stress response in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis can also be deduced by the fact

264 

that many MtGs are shared among these terms.

265 

To assess the association between the resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA

266 

replication on the embryonic developmental potential, we compared the mtDNA copy numbers

267 

between in vivo conceived (IVO) and in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos, which are characterized by

268 

higher and lower developmental rates, respectively. Our previous studies showed that IVF embryos

269 

have lower survival rate and weight, as well as greater variability in size and increased growth defects,

270 

compared to their IVO counterparts [6, 13, 17]. Quantitative analysis showed that mtDNA copy

271 

numbers in IVF embryos laid in a significantly lower range compared to those in IVO embryos (Fig.

272 

3E), suggesting that depressed mitochondrial resumption is strongly associated with impaired

273 

embryonic developmental potential.

274 

The presence of enhanced mitochondrial mass and metabolism during the implantation stage led

275 

us to speculate that postimplantation embryos face increased oxidative stress compared to

276 

preimplantation embryos. To this end, we determined the GSH/GSSG ratio, which is a well-accepted

277 

indicator for evaluating oxidative stress status [18], in E3.5 blastocysts and E7.5 epiblasts. We found

278 

the latter to display a significantly higher GSH/GSSG ratio, indicating increased oxidative stress soon

279 

after implantation (Fig. 3F).

280 

Subsequently, because of the significant changes in the expression patterns of apoptotic MtGs

281 

that had taken place by the implantation stage, we decided to compare the occurrence of apoptosis in

282 

E3.5 blastocysts and E7.5 epiblasts. TUNEL analysis showed that E7.5 epiblasts displayed a high rate

 

283 

of apoptosis compared to E3.5 blastocysts (Fig. 3G). Possible false-negative apoptotic nuclei in E3.5

284 

blastocysts can be excluded by the parallel observation of TUNEL-positive apoptotic nuclei in IVF

285 

blastocysts, which have been reported to have a relative higher apoptotic rate [6].

286 

The involvement of MtGs in embryonic survival and organogenesis

287 

To test the potential role of MtGs in embryonic survival and organogenesis, we performed an

288 

MGI analysis using dynamically changed MtGs (P < 0.05, FC >2; Supplementary Tables S5 and S6).

289 

Many MtGs were annotated with phenotypes associated with aberrant embryonic/fetal development,

290 

such as ‘Complete embryonic lethality’, ‘Embryonic growth arrest’, ‘Failure of somite differentiation’,

291 

and ‘Failure of embryo implantation’. In addition, many MtGs were associated with abnormal

292 

morphology or aberrant development of organs, especially of the neurosensory and cardiovascular

293 

systems, as well as with lethality during organogenesis. These observations suggested that orchestrated

294 

mitochondrial functions and dynamics are essential for embryonic survival and normal organogenesis

295 

both during and after implantation. In addition, we found that different mitochondrial modifications

296 

might functionally correlate with each other to regulate early organogenesis (Fig. 4).

297 

Dynamics of promoter DNA methylation of nDNA-encoded MtGs during early development

298 

The dramatic changes of mitochondrial functions and dynamics during early development,

299 

including the resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis and the shift from anaerobic to aerobic

300 

metabolism, coincide with de novo DNA methylation, which is one of the most important epigenetic

301 

events during early development. This led us to hypothesize that the de novo DNA methylation of

302 

MtGs may have an essential regulatory role in the mitochondrial modifications taking place during

303 

early development. To test this hypothesis, nDNA-encoded MtGs whose promoters were methylated at

304 

least once at three time-points (Supplementary Table S7) were hierarchically clustered based on their

305 

promoter DNA methylation levels, as described previously [19]. The resulting heatmap showed a

306 

generally progressive increase in promoter DNA methylation of MtGs during early development,

307 

especially of those belonging to clusters 1 and 2, which correspond to genes that are unmethylated in

308 

E3.5 blastocysts and gain promoter DNA methylation before E7.5 or E10.5, respectively. On the other

 

309 

hand, promoter DNA methylation increased slightly in cluster 3, which includes genes whose

310 

promoters appear methylated throughout early development (Fig. 5A).

311 

To test the correlation between promoter de novo methylation and the expression levels of MtGs

312 

during early development, we integrated the promoter DNA methylation profiles to the expression

313 

profiles of MtGs in clusters 1 and 2 (Fig. 5B; boxed by green and blue dotted lines, respectively). In

314 

cluster 1, 48 MtGs (54.5%) were downregulated during the transition from E7.5 to E10.5, with

315 

increased levels of promoter DNA methylation. In cluster 2, 85 MtGs (45.5%) showed decreased

316 

expression at E7.5 compared to E3.5, and the reduction in expression coincided with promoter de novo

317 

methylation taking place before E7.5. This result suggests that promoter de novo methylation may

318 

have a considerable regulatory effect on the expression of approximately half of MtGs, during early

319 

development.

320 

To further analyze the functional consequences of de novo methylation on mitochondrial

321 

modifications during early development, GO and KEGG analyses were performed for MtGs that were

322 

presumably regulated by increased promoter DNA methylation (indicated by green dots in Fig. 5A).

323 

The results showed that these MtGs were significantly associated with most mitochondrial functions

324 

taking place during both transitions. Amongst others, these included ‘Oxoacid metabolic process’,

325 

‘Cellular amino acid metabolic process’, ‘Electron transport chain’, ‘Mitochondrial transport’, and

326 

‘OXPHOS’ (Fig. 5C and D). It should be noted that although the number of enriched MtGs was very

327 

low (2–7), the levels of significance were very high, which implied that MtG promoter de novo

328 

methylation may profoundly affect mitochondrial functions and dynamics during early development.

329 

MtDNA methylation in postimplantation embryos

330 

Dnmt1 expression was found to be significantly higher in postimplantation than preimplantation

331 

embryos (Fig. 6A). This observation was confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis. As Dnmt1 can also

332 

translocate to the mitochondria for maintaining mtDNA methylation [20], we further investigated the

333 

expression dynamics of a transcript variant of Dnmt1 specifically targeted to mitochondria (mt-Dnmt1),

334 

which is not fully synchronized with the levels of total Dnmt1 (Fig. 6B). Based on the relatively stable

 

335 

expression of mt-Dnmt1 up to the implantation stage, we hypothesized that embryonic mtDNA may

336 

undergo methylation after implantation. This idea was supported by the enrichment of MeDIP reads on

337 

mtDNA in E7.5 epiblasts and E10.5 embryos (Fig. 6C, Supplementary Table S8). We validated this

338 

observation by performing MeDIP-qPCR with a highly sensitive and specific anti-5mC antibody. It

339 

should be mentioned that the primers used for detection were blasted against the mouse nuclear

340 

genome to prevent a possible contamination from nuclear sequences of mitochondrial origin.

341 

Focusing on the MeDIP-qPCR results from both hyper- (ND5, ND6) and hypomethylated (12S

342 

rRNA) regions, as well as a control region (D-loop), we observed that each of these regions was

343 

significantly methylated, with an increasing trend during the transition from E7.5 to E10.5 (Fig. 6D).

344 

Moreover, to confirm that mt-Dnmt1 can translocate to the mitochondria by the implantation stage, we

345 

tested the binding of mt-Dnmt1 to mtDNA by CHIP-qPCR using a non-specific anti-DNMT1 antibody

346 

and primers specific to mtDNA in E6.5 embryos, which represent a stage immediately after

347 

implantation. Results showed a significant enrichment of DNMT1 at two selected hypermethylated

348 

regions (ND5 and ND6) of mtDNA (Fig. 6E).

349  350 

Discussion

351 

It is well documented that mitochondrial functions and dynamics are of prime importance to early

352 

development. Well-organized mitochondrial modifications are thought to be essential for embryonic

353 

survival and growth during implantation, as well as for subsequent differentiation and organogenesis.

354 

Focusing on MtGs, this study provided a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the

355 

mechanisms responsible for the orchestrated mitochondrial modifications taking place during early

356 

development.

357 

During the transition from E3.5 to E7.5, embryos undergo the differentiation of embryonic germ

358 

layers and implantation, two of the most important challenges that enable further embryonic survival

359 

and growth. On the other hand, in the period between E7.5 and E10.5, embryos initiate organogenesis

360 

following the completion of gastrulation [21]. During the transition from the blastocyst to the

 

361 

gastrulation stage, embryos undergo a shift in energy metabolism, in which glycolytic activity

362 

gradually decreases but OXPHOS is rapidly enhanced. Coincident with this shift is the resumption of

363 

mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA replication. Increased mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA

364 

replication in somatic cells are thought to accommodate high energy demands during physiological

365 

and pathological processes [22, 23]. In our study, we found that the expression of many key MtGs

366 

involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA replication significantly increases during

367 

implantation. Among these, some are well-established MtGs considered responsible for the resumption

368 

of mitochondrial biogenesis in early embryos, such as Polg, Polg2, and Tfam [24-26]. Other MtGs that

369 

have been previously reported to play important roles in somatic cells may also be critical for this

370 

resumption. For example, Ssbp1 encodes a subunit of a single-stranded DNA-binding complex that

371 

can maintain the stability of mtDNA by removing mismatches during mtDNA replication [27] and

372 

support mitochondrial protein synthesis and morphology in human osteosarcoma and embryonic

373 

kidney cells [28, 29]. Stoml2, also known as Slp2, codes for a widely expressed mitochondrial inner

374 

membrane protein and can induce mitochondrial biogenesis in human T lymphocytes [30]. Tk2 codes

375 

for a deoxyribonucleoside kinase that localizes to the mitochondria and is required for the replication

376 

and maintenance of mtDNA in cultured human somatic cells [31]. A recent study demonstrated that

377 

Tk2 may be involved in the early development of zebrafish by modulating mtDNA metabolism [32];

378 

however, a role for this gene in the resumption of mtDNA replication in mammalian embryos has not

379 

yet been identified.

380 

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that are constantly undergoing fission and fusion to

381 

maintain mitochondrial homeostasis and morphology [33-36]. An interesting observation of this study

382 

was the increased level of Fis1, which is known to enable mitochondrial fission, as well as the

383 

decreased levels of Mfn1/2 and Opa1, which facilitate mitochondrial fusion. Although the role of

384 

mitochondrial fission and fusion during the period up to the implantation stage has not been

385 

well-defined, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), as well as ES and TS cells from mouse knockout

386 

models displaying deficient fission and fusion, showed evident aberrations in mitochondrial mass and

 

387 

morphology (elongated or fragmented mitochondria) [37-39]. Thus, we predict that the resumption of

388 

mitochondrial growth by the implantation stage is not only facilitated by increased mitochondrial

389 

biogenesis and mtDNA replication, but also by the appropriate balance between fission and fusion (Fig.

390 

7A). In addition, deficient fission and fusion result in disrupted mitochondrial functions, distribution,

391 

and apoptosis, with deficient embryos dying in midgestation [37-39]. These facts imply that fission

392 

and fusion dynamics may also be involved in many aspects of mitochondrial modifications during this

393 

critical period.

394 

Enhanced mitochondrial functions not only provide more ATP but also produce more ROS.

395 

Energy metabolism in mitochondria, including TCA, β-oxidation, and (especially) OXPHOS, is the

396 

major source of ROS. Our results regarding the GSH/GSSG ratio suggested that embryos face

397 

increased oxidative stress soon after implantation. Mitochondria are both a major source and a target

398 

of ROS [40]. Mitochondrial glutathione (mGSH), which is synthesized in the cytosol and then

399 

imported into the mitochondrial matrix, is thought to be the key survival antioxidant for maintaining

400 

the appropriate mitochondrial redox environment [41]. Interestingly, the temporal pattern of GSH

401 

biosynthesis is similar to the dynamics of the resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis by the

402 

implantation stage [42]. Thus, increased GSH biosynthesis may be a physiological response to

403 

enhanced mitochondrial functions and the consequent increase in ROS levels. Indeed, we observed an

404 

evident activation of many key MtGs involved in GSH biosynthesis and metabolism. The expression

405 

of Gclc and Gs (Glul), which code for the enzymes that catalyze the first (rate-limiting) and second

406 

steps of glutathione biosynthesis, increased during implantation. We also found that Nrf1 and Nrf2

407 

were upregulated; these well-known transcription factors can activate GSH-based antioxidative genes,

408 

including Gclc, Gss, Glrxs, and Gpxs [43, 44]. Consistently, Keap1 and Cul3, which code for proteins

409 

that inactivate Nrf2 by forming a KAP1/CUL3/NRF2 complex in the cytosol, were downregulated

410 

during the transition from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts. Previous studies in normal somatic cells

411 

and cancer cells indicated that the inhibition of either Keap1 or Cul3 increases the nuclear

412 

accumulation of Nrf2, leading to the activation of Nrf2-dependent antioxidative gene expression [45,

 

413 

46]. Although the role of ROS in uncoupling NRF2 from the KAP1/CUL3 complex and thereby

414 

upregulating the transcription of GSH-based antioxidative genes has been well documented in many

415 

somatic cell types [47], the involvement of ROS in the Nrf2-induced activation of the GSH system has

416 

never been demonstrated in early embryogenesis. Our data suggest that the enhancement of

417 

mitochondrial functions in embryos by the implantation stage may increase the production of cellular

418 

ROS, activating the expression of the GSH-based antioxidative system via the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling

419 

pathway to protect mitochondria against oxidative stress (Fig. 7B). The transition from E3.5

420 

blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts was also characterized by a marked increase in the expression of many

421 

Gpxs, which are the genes coding for proteins that catalyze the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and

422 

lipid peroxides by GSH. Among these, Gpx3 and Gpx4 are well-known mitochondrial Gpx genes that

423 

are essential for oxidative homeostasis in mitochondria [48, 49].

424 

We also found many apoptotic genes undergoing significant changes during early development.

425 

TUNEL analysis showed that E7.5 epiblasts displayed a high rate of apoptosis compared to E3.5

426 

blastocysts, consistently to previously reported observations in hESCs undergoing differentiation [50].

427 

Compared with MtGs associated with ‘Mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA replication’ and

428 

‘GSH-based antioxidative response’, the gene expression dynamics of ‘Apoptotic mitochondrial

429 

change’ showed a complicated pattern. Indeed, properly controlled mitochondrial apoptotic signaling

430 

is not harmful to early embryos; in contrast, it is considered significant for the survival and

431 

differentiation of early embryos [50, 51]. A PPI analysis showed that the term ‘Apoptotic

432 

mitochondrial change’ was highly associated with ‘GSH-based antioxidative response’ and

433 

‘Mitochondrial biogenesis’. Similarly, REVIGO analysis showed that ‘Apoptotic mitochondrial

434 

change’ interacted significantly with ‘Oxoacid metabolism’. These observations imply that the

435 

apoptotic and survival signals may be balanced by the GSH-based stress response (Fig. 7B).

436 

Our data suggest that, in addition to successful implantation, mitochondrial functions or dynamics

437 

may be also involved in early organogenesis. Using the MGI database, we found that many of the

438 

MtGs whose expression was significantly altered (P < 0.05, FC >2) were associated with embryonic

 

439 

death or aberrant development. At E7.5, when embryos are in an advanced stage of the gastrulation

440 

process and have a formed neural plate, many of these MtGs were annotated with phenotypes such as

441 

‘Decreased neuron number’, ‘Abnormal neural crest cell apoptosis’, and ‘Abnormal neural tube

442 

morphology/development’. From E7.5 to E10.5, the neural plate folds to form the neural tube and the

443 

brain, while structures and organs such as somites, the heart, and the limb buds start developing. MtGs

444 

at this stage were annotated with phenotypes that included ‘Abnormal nervous system morphology’,

445 

‘Abnormal eye development’, ‘Abnormal heart morphology’, and ‘Abnormal limb morphology’. It is

446 

noteworthy that the MAPK and Wnt signaling pathways were tightly clustered with MtGs that are

447 

responsible for mitochondrial functions. Previous studies in mouse and human ES cells indicated that

448 

mitochondrial apoptotic signals might contribute to differentiation programs, probably via the MAPK

449 

and Wnt signaling pathways [50, 51].

450 

Our next step was to investigate whether the well-orchestrated mitochondrial functions and

451 

dynamics taking place by the implantation stage are regulated by epigenetic modifications. Coinciding

452 

with the dramatic mitochondrial changes during early development, embryos undergo de novo DNA

453 

methylation. Aberrant de novo DNA methylation caused by deleting or mutating Dnmts in mice or ES

454 

cells results in embryonic lethality and failed differentiation [52, 53]. Thus, we decided to investigate

455 

the possible functional association of these two early developmental events. Our data showed that

456 

most MtGs (clusters 1 and 2) underwent de novo methylation in their promoter regions during early

457 

development. These observations were very similar to those reported by Borgel et al. [19] and Smith et

458 

al. [54], who demonstrated that embryos undergo global promoter de novo methylation in the period

459 

between the preimplantation and the postimplantation stages. In our study, the integrated analysis of

460 

MtGs that underwent promoter de novo methylation revealed that approximately half of them

461 

displayed reduced expression levels. Many of these MtGs are significantly associated with

462 

mitochondrial functions and diseases. These results demonstrate that de novo DNA methylation, one of

463 

the most important epigenetic events during mammalian embryogenesis, may have considerable

 

464 

functional consequences for the mitochondrial modifications that are essential for embryonic survival

465 

and growth.

466 

Another finding was that the mtDNA of both E7.5 and E10.5 embryos showed significant

467 

enrichment of MeDIP reads. This novel finding suggests that mtDNA methylation, which has been

468 

reported in many somatic cell types [20, 55, 56], can be observed as early as immediately after

469 

implantation. We also showed that this enrichment in early embryos was not limited to regions that

470 

coded for enzymes essential for OXPHOS (ND5, ND6), but also in noncoding regions (12S rRNA) and

471 

a control region (D-loop). In addition, in our study mtDNA methylation appeared to be independent of

472 

CpG density, as it was detected in both high- and low-CpG regions. This result is consistent with the

473 

findings of Bellizzi et al., who reported that both CpG and non-CpG regions of mtDNA can be

474 

methylated in human blood and cultured cells [56]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study

475 

to show that mtDNA becomes methylated in early embryos and that mt-DNMT1 can translocate into

476 

the mitochondria matrix and bind to mtDNA for maintaining mtDNA methylation by the implantation

477 

stage. Indeed, our unpublished data indicate that mtDNA undergoes a process similar to the de novo

478 

DNA methylation of the nuclear genome, thereby demonstrating that highly dynamic DNA

479 

methylation modifications are critical not only for the nuclear genome but also for the mitochondrial

480 

genome.

481 

Overall, our study provided high-resolution dynamic expression profiles of MtGs during early

482 

embryogenesis. Our data indicate that orchestrated MtG expression is critical for the ‘embryonic shift’

483 

in energy metabolism and the resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis, which is of prime importance

484 

for successful embryonic implantation and survival. In addition, the mitochondria-mediated balance

485 

between apoptosis and the stress response plays a significant role in the differentiation and

486 

organogenesis of postimplantation embryos. Our data also suggest that promoter de novo methylation

487 

of nDNA-encoded MtGs may have considerable functional consequences for mitochondrial

488 

modifications. Finally, mtDNA methylation in somatic cells can be observed as early as immediately

489 

after implantation. Our study can serve as a comprehensive reference for the further study of

 

490 

mitochondrial modulations during early mammalian embryogenesis and provides a new insight into

491 

the epigenetic mechanisms modulating mitochondrial functions and dynamics at this stage.

492 

Acknowledgments

493 

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.

494 

31672426 and 31472092) and the National High-Tech R&D Program (2013AA102506).

495  496 

 

References:

497  498  499  500  501  502  503  504  505  506  507  508  509  510  511  512  513  514  515  516  517  518  519  520  521  522  523  524  525  526  527  528  529  530  531  532  533  534  535  536  537  538  539  540 

1. Harvey A, Gibson T, Lonergan T, Brenner C. Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial function in preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Mitochondrion 2011; 11: 829-838. 2. Ramalho-Santos J, Varum S, Amaral S, Mota PC, Sousa AP, Amaral A. Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 553-572. 3. Mootha VK, Bunkenborg J, Olsen JV, Hjerrild M, Wisniewski JR, Stahl E, Bolouri MS, Ray HN, Sihag S, Kamal M, Patterson N, Lander ES, Mann M. Integrated analysis of protein composition, tissue diversity, and gene regulation in mouse mitochondria. Cell 2003; 115: 629-640. 4. Jian B, Yang S, Chen D, Zou L, Chatham JC, Chaudry I, Raju R. Aging influences cardiac mitochondrial gene expression and cardiovascular function following hemorrhage injury. Mol Med 2011; 17: 542-549. 5. Hsiao CP, Wang D, Kaushal A, Saligan L. Mitochondria-related gene expression changes are associated with fatigue in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving external beam radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 2013; 36: 189-197. 6. Ren L, Wang Z, An L, Zhang Z, Tan K, Miao K, Tao L, Cheng L, Zhang Z, Yang M, Wu Z, Tian J. Dynamic comparisons of high-resolution expression profiles highlighting mitochondria-related genes between in vivo and in vitro fertilized early mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2892-2911. 7. Takasugi M, Yagi S, Hirabayashi K, Shiota K. DNA methylation status of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes underlies the tissue-dependent mitochondrial functions. BMC Genomics 2010; 11: 481. 8. Kelly RD, Mahmud A, McKenzie M, Trounce IA, St John JC. Mitochondrial DNA copy number is regulated in a tissue specific manner by DNA methylation of the nuclear-encoded DNA polymerase gamma A. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 10124-10138. 9. Hashemi M, Rezaei H, Kaykhaei MA, Taheri M. Association of the Promoter Methylation of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A With Susceptibility to Metabolic Syndrome. Gene Cell Tissue 2014; 1: e18308. 10. Gemma C, Sookoian S, Dieuzeide G, Garcia SI, Gianotti TF, Gonzalez CD, Pirola CJ. Methylation of TFAM gene promoter in peripheral white blood cells is associated with insulin resistance in adolescents. Mol Genet Metab 2010; 100: 83-87. 11. Barres R, Osler ME, Yan J, Rune A, Fritz T, Caidahl K, Krook A, Zierath JR. Non-CpG methylation of the PGC-1alpha promoter through DNMT3B controls mitochondrial density. Cell Metab 2009; 10: 189-198. 12. Downs KM, Davies T. Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 1993; 118: 1255-1266. 13. Sui L, An L, Tan K, Wang Z, Wang S, Miao K, Ren L, Tao L, He S, Yu Y, Nie J, Liu Q, Xing L, Wu Z, Hou Z, Tian J. Dynamic proteomic profiles of in vivo- and in vitro-produced mouse postimplantation extraembryonic tissues and placentas. Biol Reprod 2014; 91: 155. 14. Giritharan G, Talbi S, Donjacour A, Di Sebastiano F, Dobson AT, Rinaudo PF. Effect of in vitro fertilization on gene expression and development of mouse preimplantation embryos. REPRODUCTION 2007; 134: 63-72. 15. Huang W, Khatib H. Comparison of transcriptomic landscapes of bovine embryos using RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics 2010; 11: 711. 16. Kepkova KV, Vodicka P, Toralova T, Lopatarova M, Cech S, Dolezel R, Havlicek V, Besenfelder U, Kuzmany A, Sirard MA, Laurincik J, Kanka J. Transcriptomic analysis of in vivo and in vitro produced bovine embryos revealed

a developmental change in cullin 1 expression during maternal-to-embryonic transition.

Theriogenology 2011; 75: 1582-1595.  

541  542  543  544  545  546  547  548  549  550  551  552  553  554  555  556  557  558  559  560  561  562  563  564  565  566  567  568  569  570  571  572  573  574  575  576  577  578  579  580  581  582  583  584  585 

17. Nie J, An L, Miao K, Hou Z, Yu Y, Tan K, Sui L, He S, Liu Q, Lei X, Wu Z, Tian J. Comparative analysis of dynamic proteomic profiles between in vivo and in vitro produced mouse embryos during postimplantation period. J Proteome Res 2013; 12: 3843-3856. 18. Zitka O, Skalickova S, Gumulec J, Masarik M, Adam V, Hubalek J, Trnkova L, Kruseova J, Eckschlager T, Kizek R. Redox status expressed as GSH:GSSG ratio as a marker for oxidative stress in paediatric tumour patients. Oncol Lett 2012; 4: 1247-1253. 19. Borgel J, Guibert S, Li Y, Chiba H, Schubeler D, Sasaki H, Forne T, Weber M. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 1093-1100. 20. Shock LS, Thakkar PV, Peterson EJ, Moran RG, Taylor SM. DNA methyltransferase 1, cytosine methylation, and cytosine hydroxymethylation in mammalian mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 3630-3635. 21. Geng X, Oliver G. Elucidating the molecular characteristics of organogenesis in human embryos. Genome Biol 2010; 11: 130. 22. Jornayvaz FR, Shulman GI. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Essays Biochem 2010; 47: 69-84. 23. Lee HC, Wei YH. Mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA maintenance of mammalian cells under oxidative stress. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 37: 822-834. 24. Hance N, Ekstrand MI, Trifunovic A. Mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma is essential for mammalian embryogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14: 1775-1783. 25. Larsson NG, Wang J, Wilhelmsson H, Oldfors A, Rustin P, Lewandoski M, Barsh GS, Clayton DA. Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice. Nat Genet 1998; 18: 231-236. 26. Humble MM, Young MJ, Foley JF, Pandiri AR, Travlos GS, Copeland WC. Polg2 is essential for mammalian embryogenesis and is required for mtDNA maintenance. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22: 1017-1025. 27. Kazak L, Reyes A, Holt IJ. Minimizing the damage: repair pathways keep mitochondrial DNA intact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13: 659-671. 28. He J, Cooper HM, Reyes A, Di Re M, Sembongi H, Litwin TR, Gao J, Neuman KC, Fearnley IM, Spinazzola A, Walker JE, Holt IJ. Mitochondrial nucleoid interacting proteins support mitochondrial protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 6109-6121. 29. Arakaki N, Nishihama T, Kohda A, Owaki H, Kuramoto Y, Abe R, Kita T, Suenaga M, Himeda T, Kuwajima M, Shibata H, Higuti T. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology and cell survival by Mitogenin I and mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1760: 1364-1372. 30. Christie DA, Lemke CD, Elias IM, Chau LA, Kirchhof MG, Li B, Ball EH, Dunn SD, Hatch GM, Madrenas J. Stomatin-like protein 2 binds cardiolipin and regulates mitochondrial biogenesis

and function.

Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31: 3845-3856. 31. Rampazzo C, Fabris S, Franzolin E, Crovatto K, Frangini M, Bianchi V. Mitochondrial thymidine kinase and the enzymatic network regulating thymidine triphosphate pools in cultured human cells. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 34758-34769. 32. Artuso L, Romano A, Verri T, Domenichini A, Argenton F, Santorelli FM, Petruzzella V. Mitochondrial DNA metabolism in early development of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1817: 1002-1011. 33. Bossy-Wetzel E, Barsoum MJ, Godzik A, Schwarzenbacher R, Lipton SA. Mitochondrial fission in apoptosis, neurodegeneration and aging. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15: 706-716. 34. Santel A, Fuller MT. Control of mitochondrial morphology by a human mitofusin. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: 867-874. 35. Chen Y, Liu Y, Dorn GN. Mitochondrial fusion is essential for organelle function and cardiac homeostasis.  

586  587  588  589  590  591  592  593  594  595  596  597  598  599  600  601  602  603  604  605  606  607  608  609  610  611  612  613  614  615  616  617  618  619  620  621  622  623  624  625  626  627  628  629  630 

Circ Res 2011; 109: 1327-1331. 36. Ishihara N, Fujita Y, Oka T, Mihara K. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology through proteolytic cleavage of OPA1. EMBO J 2006; 25: 2966-2977. 37. Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol 2003; 160: 189-200. 38. Chen H, Chomyn A, Chan DC. Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 26185-26192. 39. Ishihara N, Nomura M, Jofuku A, Kato H, Suzuki SO, Masuda K, Otera H, Nakanishi Y, Nonaka I, Goto Y, Taguchi N, Morinaga H, Maeda M, Takayanagi R, Yokota S, Mihara K. Mitochondrial fission factor Drp1 is essential for embryonic development and synapse formation in mice. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11: 958-966. 40. Reinecke F, Smeitink JA, van der Westhuizen FH. OXPHOS gene expression and control in mitochondrial disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1792: 1113-1121. 41. Mari M, Morales A, Colell A, Garcia-Ruiz C, Fernandez-Checa JC. Mitochondrial glutathione, a key survival antioxidant. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009; 11: 2685-2700. 42. Hansen JM, Harris C. Glutathione during embryonic development. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1850: 1527-1542. 43. Yang H, Magilnick N, Lee C, Kalmaz D, Ou X, Chan JY, Lu SC. Nrf1 and Nrf2 regulate rat glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit transcription indirectly via NF-kappaB and AP-1. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 5933-5946. 44. Chepelev NL, Zhang H, Liu H, McBride S, Seal AJ, Morgan TE, Finch CE, Willmore WG, Davies KJ, Forman HJ. Competition of nuclear factor-erythroid 2 factors related transcription factor isoforms, Nrf1 and Nrf2, in antioxidant enzyme induction. Redox Biol 2013; 1: 183-189. 45. Cullinan SB, Gordan JD, Jin J, Harper JW, Diehl JA. The Keap1-BTB protein is an adaptor that bridges Nrf2 to a Cul3-based E3 ligase: oxidative stress sensing by a Cul3-Keap1 ligase. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 8477-8486. 46. Wang R, An J, Ji F, Jiao H, Sun H, Zhou D. Hypermethylation of the Keap1 gene in human lung cancer cell lines and lung cancer tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 373: 151-154. 47. Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT. The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci 2014; 39: 199-218. 48. Passaia G, Fonini LS, Caverzan A, Jardim-Messeder D, Christoff AP, Gaeta ML, de Araujo MJ, Margis R, Margis-Pinheiro M. The mitochondrial glutathione peroxidase GPX3 is essential for H2O2 homeostasis and root and shoot development in rice. Plant Sci 2013; 208: 93-101. 49. Savaskan NE, Ufer C, Kuhn H, Borchert A. Molecular biology of glutathione peroxidase 4: from genomic structure to developmental expression and neural function. Biol Chem 2007; 388: 1007-1017. 50. Qin H, Yu T, Qing T, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Cai J, Li J, Song Z, Qu X, Zhou P, Wu J, Ding M, Deng H. Regulation of apoptosis and differentiation by p53 in human embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 5842-5852. 51. Duval D, Trouillas M, Thibault C, Dembele D, Diemunsch F, Reinhardt B, Mertz AL, Dierich A, Boeuf H. Apoptosis and differentiation commitment: novel insights revealed by gene profiling studies in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 564-575. 52. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999; 99: 247-257. 53. Liao J, Karnik R, Gu H, Ziller MJ, Clement K, Tsankov AM, Akopian V, Gifford CA, Donaghey J, Galonska C, Pop R, Reyon D, Tsai SQ, Mallard W, Joung JK, Rinn JL, Gnirke A, Meissner A. Targeted disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 469-478.  

631  632  633  634  635  636 

54. Smith ZD, Chan MM, Mikkelsen TS, Gu H, Gnirke A, Regev A, Meissner A. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 2012; 484: 339-344. 55. Dzitoyeva S, Chen H, Manev H. Effect of aging on 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in brain mitochondria. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33: 2881-2891. 56. Bellizzi D, D'Aquila P, Scafone T, Giordano M, Riso V, Riccio A, Passarino G. The control region of mitochondrial DNA shows an unusual CpG and non-CpG methylation pattern. DNA Res 2013; 20: 537-547.

637  638 

 

639 

Figure legends

640 

Figure 1. General dynamic profiling of mitochondria-related genes (MtGs) during early development.

641 

(A) Hierarchical clustering analysis based on the dynamic expression levels of MtGs of embryos from

642 

pre- to postimplantation. Normalized expression levels (RPKM) are represented by different colors:

643 

red indicates high abundance and green indicates low abundance. The number of MtGs in each cluster

644 

is presented on the right side. General trends in expression changes are indicated by the average

645 

RPKM value of MtGs in each cluster. (B) Fold change (FC) distribution analysis of MtGs between

646 

E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5 epiblasts as well as between E7.5 epiblasts and E10.5 embryos. Only MtGs

647 

with statistically significant changes in expression were included (P < 0.05). (C) Venn diagrams of

648 

upregulated (left panel, red) and downregulated (right panel, green) MtGs for two developmental

649 

transitions. Tables show the major functions of MtGs that are consistently upregulated (left) or

650 

downregulated (right) during early development.

651 

Figure 2. General functional profiling of MtGs whose expression significantly changed (P < 0.05,

652 

FC >2) during early development. (A-B) Classification of GO terms based on the functional

653 

annotation of biological processes (BPs) enriched in the transition from E3.5 blastocysts to E7.5

654 

epiblasts, as well as from E7.5 epiblasts to E10.5 embryos. The left ordinate represents the number of

655 

enriched MtGs corresponding to each term and the right ordinate represents the enrichment score

656 

(defined as −Log10 P-value). (C-D) Graph visualization of enriched BPs in A and B based on REVIGO

657 

analysis. Bubble color indicates P-value. Functionally associated BPs are linked. (E-F) Interaction

658 

networks of MtGs during early development created by a web-based search of the STRING database.

659 

Boxed regions represent tightly interconnected functional clusters.

660 

Figure 3. Mitochondrial modifications during implantation stage. (A) Model illustrating the

661 

‘embryonic shift’ from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, as well as the resumption of mitochondrial

662 

biogenesis and the enhanced response to oxidative stress. Red text indicates upregulated MtGs, while

663 

green text indicates downregulated MtGs. (B) Fold changes of representative MtGs involved in

664 

essential mitochondrial modifications by the implantation stage. (C) Relative expression levels of

 

665 

some representative MtGs in E3.5 blastocysts and E7.5 epiblasts determined by qRT-PCR. (D)

666 

Interaction networks of MtGs responsible for essential mitochondrial modifications taking place

667 

during the implantation stage. (E) Boxplot quantitative comparison of mtDNA copy numbers between

668 

E10.5 embryos with higher and lower survival rates. (F) Ratios of reduced glutathione (GSH) to

669 

oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in E3.5 blastocysts and E7.5 epiblasts; **P < 0.01. (G) Representative

670 

images of apoptosis detected by TUNEL in E3.5 blastocysts and E7.5 epiblasts. Rightmost panels:

671 

higher magnification of boxed regions in E7.5 epiblasts. The nuclei of blastomeres were labeled with

672 

DAPI. Representative TUNEL-positive apoptotic nuclei are indicated with arrows. Scale bars, 100

673 

μm.

674 

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the functional associations among MtGs that are annotated with

675 

aberrant organogenesis during the postimplantation stage. Colored boxes indicate mitochondrial

676 

modifications that may be essential for embryonic survival and normal organogenesis during the

677 

implantation and postimplantation periods.

678 

Figure 5. Dynamics of promoter DNA methylation of nDNA-encoded MtGs and functional

679 

consequences during early development (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis based on dynamic

680 

methylation levels of MtGs during the transition from pre- to postimplantation embryos. Normalized

681 

methylation levels are represented by different colors: red indicates relatively hypermethylated

682 

promoters and black indicates relatively hypomethylated promoters. The numbers of MtGs in each

683 

cluster are displayed on the right side of the plot. Graphs next to the plot display promoter methylation

684 

levels during early development. The red line (upper graph) indicates total normalized methylation

685 

values while blue lines (three lower graphs) correspond to average normalized methylation levels in

686 

each cluster. (B) Scatter plots of expression changes versus mean differences of methylation for the

687 

MtGs of cluster 1 (upper plot, boxed by green dotted line) and cluster 2 (lower plot, boxed by blue

688 

dotted line) whose promoters underwent de novo methylation before E7.5 and E10.5, respectively.

689 

Green dots indicate MtGs that are downregulated during the process of promoter de novo methylation,

690 

while red dots indicate upregulated MtGs (C-D) Functional profiling of MtGs corresponding to the

 

691 

green dots of the shaded regions of the scatter plots in (B) and may be negatively regulated by

692 

promoter de novo methylation taking place between E3.5 and E7.5 or between E7.5 and E10.5.

693 

Figure 6. MtDNA methylation in postimplantation embryos. (A) Expression dynamics of Dnmt1

694 

during early development as assessed by RNA-seq. (B) Relative expression levels of total Dnmt1 and

695 

mt-Dnmt1 during early development as determined by qRT-PCR. (C) MtDNA methylation levels are

696 

presented as enriched MeDIP-seq reads (y-axis) on mtDNA positions (x-axis) in E7.5 epiblasts (upper

697 

plot) and E10.5 embryos (lower plot). (D) Relative methylation levels at selected regions of mtDNA as

698 

detected by MeDIP-qPCR in E7.5 epiblasts (upper plot) and E10.5 embryos (lower plot). (E) Relative

699 

enrichment of DNMT1 at selected regions (Nd5 and Nd6) of mtDNA as determined by CHIP-qPCR in

700 

E6.5 embryos. Values indicated by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). *P < 0.05;

701 

**P < 0.01.

702 

Figure 7. Schematic diagrams illustrating essential mitochondrial modifications during early

703 

development. (A) The resumption of mitochondrial biogenesis by the implantation stage appears to be

704 

facilitated not only by increased mitochondrial biogenesis and mtDNA replication but also by the

705 

skewed balance between fission and fusion. (B) Enhanced aerobic metabolism by the implantation

706 

stage, especially OXPHOS, leads to increased ROS production, which appears be the inducer of GSH

707 

biosynthesis. The apoptotic and survival signals in early embryos may be balanced by the GSH-based

708 

stress response.

709 

 

710 

Table 1. Enriched KEGG pathways (Top 15) for MtGs significantly changed during early

711 

development E7.5 epiblasts vs. E3.5 blastocysts

KEGG terms

E10.5 embryos vs. E7.5 epiblasts

Count

P-value

KEGG terms

Count

P-value

22

6.56E-16

Alzheimer's disease

24

2.45E-09

Fatty acid metabolism

17

1.60E-11

14

2.57E-09

Alzheimer's disease

31

8.82E-11

Huntington's disease

24

2.74E-09

Butanoate metabolism

14

1.63E-09

Parkinson's disease

18

2.92E-07

15

3.27E-09

Oxidative phosphorylation

17

1.12E-06

Huntington's disease

28

1.03E-08

Propanoate metabolism

8

2.03E-05

Propanoate metabolism

12

1.83E-08

Butanoate metabolism

8

8.60E-05

Pyruvate metabolism

13

7.36E-08

9

2.41E-04

PPAR signaling pathway

17

1.45E-07

ABC transporters

8

3.11E-04

Parkinson's disease

22

1.51E-07

Fatty acid metabolism

8

3.11E-04

Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)

11

3.37E-07

8

3.57E-04

14

5.22E-07

10

0.0010

15

7.23E-07

7

0.0019

Tryptophan metabolism

10

3.48E-05

9

0.0022

beta-Alanine metabolism

7

2.39E-04

6

0.0023

Arginine and proline metabolism

Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis

712 

 

Arginine and proline metabolism

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation Apoptosis Steroid hormone biosynthesis PPAR signaling pathway Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism

92

Cluster 5

203

Cluster 6

50 40 30 20 10

Cluster 5

60 45 30 15 0

Log 2 Fold change

Group 1 Cluster 6

Group 3

144

Cluster 4

Group 3

Cluster 4

10 38

6

107 116 223 248 90 74

2 -2

261 920 188

24

-6

-10 10

Expression levels (RPKM)

Cluster 3

Group 2

100 80 60 40 20

121

172

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

120 100 80 60 40

B

Cluster 2 100 80 60 40 20

Log 2 Fold change

Cluster 1

Group 1

Cluster 1 200 170 140 110 80 50

Group 2

E10.5

306

E7.5

Expression levels (RPKM)

E3.5

Expression levels (RPKM)

A

21

6

175 54 100 260 281 74 42

2 -2 -6

843 127

11

-10 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Log2 average RPKM

C

Functions

Consistently upregulated MtGs (FC>2)

Apoptosis/ proliferation/ differentiation

Nfatc4, Prkca, Smad3, Pak7, Ndn, Ak1, Casp8, Cyp1b1, Stmn1, Dpysl2, Bcl2, Wnt1, Shh, Cav1, Nos3, Mtch1, Stard13

Lipid metabolism

Pla2g4a, Abcd2, Mlycd, Hmgcs2

E7.5 vs. E3.5 193 58

151 31

E10.5 vs. E7.5

94 Mpo, Glrx2, Idh1, Mgst1

transmembra ne transport

Scn1b, Slc8a2, Slc25a25, Cacna1b

Consistently down-regulated mito-genes (FC>2)

Apoptosis/ proliferation/ differentiation

Cyct, Dmc1, Lgals12, Mtus1, Spns1, Ndufs1, Spast

Genetic information

Dmc1, Ppargc1b

Mito-membrane organization

Mtx1, Dsp, Immt, Slc25a41, Efhd1, Timm9, Cacna1d, Myh9

Glucose/ lipid/ amino acis metabolism

Echdc2, Atp5g1, Cox7a2l, Dmgdh, Atg7, Ass1

E7.5 vs. E3.5

111 Anti-oxidation

Functions

E10.5 vs. E7.5

Figure 1

No. of enriched genes

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

60 40 20 0

C

D

E

F

Mitochondrial translation

β-oxidation & TCA

Enrichment score

No. of enriched genes

80

Enrichment score

No. of enriched genes

B 50

25

40

20

30

15

20

10

10

5

0

0

Enrichment score

A

OXPHOS & mitochondria translation & transmembrane transport

Electron transfer chain

Amino acid metabolism Transmembrane transport

OXPHOS

Response to ROS Apoptosis/ proliferation

TCA & β-oxidation & Amino acid metabolism

Mitochondrial biogenesis

Figure 2

Response to ROS & apoptosis & proliferation & differentiation Prostaglandin metabolism

E3.5

B

E7.5

Hk2, Pdha1, Pdha2

Glycolysis Increased ROS OXPHOS

Atp5a1, Atp5b, Atp5d, Atp5e, Atp5f1, Atp5g1, Atp5g2, Atp5h, Atp5j2, Atp5s

Log2 Fold change form E3.5 to E7.5

A

Response to oxidative stress

Gclc, Gs, Gpx3, Gpx7, Glrx5, Gstm1, Slc25a11, Cul3, Keap1

Log2 Fold change form E3.5 to E7.5

Mitochondrial biogenesis

Polg, Slc25a33, Polg2, Tfam, Ssbp1, Dhodh, Fis1, Mfn1, Mfn2

5

MtGs repressing mitochondrial biogenesis

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

GSH-based antioxidative response

MtGs repressing GSH synthesis

E3.5

4

E7.5

3

Log2 Fold change form E3.5 to E7.5

Relative expression levels to E3.5

Mitochondrial biogenesis & mtDNA replication

Cpt1b, Cpt1c, Cpt2

β-oxidation

C

6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

2 1 0

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

Apoptotic mitochondrial change

GSH-based antioxidative response

D

E Apoptotic mitochondrial change

Mitochondrial biogenesis

mtDNA copy number

1500 1200 900 600 300 0

80

G

E7.5 epiblast

Boxed region a

DAPI

100 60 40 20 0 E3.5 (n = 30)

E7.5 (n = 20)

DAPI/ TUNEL

F

Ratio of GSH/ GSSG

E3.5 blastocysts

**

Figure 3

a

b

b

Hk2: abnormal

Lrp5: abnormal eye

neuronal precursor proliferation

development; abnormal limb morphology

Cybb:

Mthfd1: abnormal

cardiac hypertrophy

Mthfd1l:

abnormal neural tube morphology

heart morphology; abnormal neural tube closure

Glucose/ lipid/ amino acid metabolism

vascular endothelial cell morphology

Dnaja3:

enlarged heart; cardiac interstitial fibrosis

Nos3: abnormal heart

morphology; abnormal limb morphology; abnormal neuron morphology; abnormal vascular branching morphogenesis

Cav1: abnormal astrocyte morphology; cardiomyopathy

Drd2: abnormal neuronal

Mitochondrial biogenesis & mtDNA replication

morphology; abnormal sensory capabilities

Shh : abnormal eye Polg: dilated

Abcd2 : abnormal nervous

heart left ventricle

system physiology; abnormal nervous system physiology

development; abnormal heart morphology; abnormal limb morphology; abnormal nervous system morphology

Hspa5 : abnormal

Slc8a2 :

abnormal neuron physiology

bone morphology

Apoptotic changes

abnormal sensory capabilities

abnormal neuron physiology

neuron differentiation/ proliferation

Atp7a: abnormal limb

Transmembrane transport

Cacna1b :

Scn2a1:

migration; abnormal neuron physiology

Nos2: abnormal heart

Abcd1: abnormal lens morphology; abnormal nervous system physiology

Ptrf: abnormal

Pink1: abnormal

neuron physiology; abnormal sensory capabilities

Ucp2: decreased

Vdr : abnormal heart ventricle morphology; abnormal limb bone morphology

Rnf7 : abnormal neuronal

neuron apoptosis

Casp2: abnormal

migration

neuron apoptosis

Response to stress

Bbc3 : abnormal heart left Glrx2 : abnormal

ventricle pressure; abnormal neuron physiology

eye physiology

Sod1 : neurodegeneration

Fxn : neurodegeneration Gstm1 : increased neuron apoptosis

Apaf1 : abnormal neural tube

morphology; abnormal neuronal migration/differentation; increased neuron apoptosis

Figure 4

Log2 Fold change (RNA-seq)

500

Cluster 1

0

Cluster 2 18 15 12 9 6 3 0

10 8 6 4 2

D

0

4

4.5

5

-3

48

Cluster 2

6

102

3 0

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

-3

85

-6

Log2 Fold change (MeDIP-seq)

Cluster 1 10

8

8

6

6

4

4 2

2

0

0

-Log 10 P value

4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

0

Log2 Fold change (MeDIP-seq)

Log2 Fold change (RNA-seq)

3.5 2.8 2.1 1.4 0.7 0.0

40

3

-6

Cluster 2

3.0 2.4 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.0

-Log 10 P value

C

No. of enriched genes

Cluster 3

Cluster 1

6

1000

Cluster 3

69

212

Cluster 2

B

Total 1500

No. of enriched genes

Cluster 1

Ave. normalized Ave. normalized Ave. normalized methylation levels methylation levels methylation levels

103

Total normalized methylation levels

A

KEGG pathway (Cluster 2)

Count

P-value

KEGG pathway (Cluster 1)

Count

Pvalue

Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

5

0.0002

Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism

3

0.001

Alzheimer's disease

7

0.002

Alzheimer's disease

5

0.002

Arginine & proline metabolism

4

0.008

Huntington's disease

5

0.002

Huntington's disease

6

0.012

Parkinson's disease

4

0.008

Alanine, aspartate ,glutamate metabolism

3

0.022

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

3

0.014

Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis

2

0.038

Apoptosis

3

0.032

Figure 5

0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00

b 6

c

4 2

a

0

0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00

E10.5

1.6 1.2

ND5

a a

0.8 0.4 0.0

3.0

**

2.0 1.0 0.0 ND5

ND6 D-loop

Figure 6

IgG

5mC

**

15.0 **

10.0 5.0

**

**

**

**

0.0 **

60.0

E10.5

40.0 ** 20.0

**

**

IgG DNMT1

*

4.0

E7.5 20.0

0.0 12S

a

E3.5 E7.5 E10.5

D

E7.5

0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00

E6.5

2.0

E3.5 E7.5 E10.5

E7.5 E10.5

E

mt-Dnmt1

Methylation level detected by MeDIP-qPCR

Methylation level detected by MeDIP-seq

8

Relative expression levels

0.20

E3.5

C

Total Dnmt1

Relative expression levels

0.25

Fold enrichment

B RPKM of Dnmt1

A

**

**

ND6

A D

Nucleus MtGs for fusion and fission

Nrfs Polg, Polg2, Tfam, Ssbp1, Tk2, Stoml2, Fis1

Fis1, Mfn1, Mfn2, Opa1

Fis1

Opa1 Mfn1/2

E3.5

Fission

E7.5

Fusion

Fusion Fission Mitochondrial biogenesis & mtDNA replication

Casp3

B

Apoptosis

Damage

Cyto C

β-oxidation ROS TCA

Mitochondrion Slc25a11

Cyto C Bax, Bcl2l1, Bid, Bbc3 (Puma)

Damage

GSH

P53 OXPHOS

ROS

Nucleus ROS

GSH Nrf2 Kep1 Cul3

ROS

O-

O2-

Nrf2 Kep1 Cul3

Nrf2 Gs

Reduced glutathione (GSH) Gpx

Gclc, Gs, Gpxs, Gstm1, Glrx2

Gclc Glutamlycysteine

Clycine

Glutamate Cysteine

Gstm1 Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) ROS Prot-SH

Prot-S-SG Glrx2

Gclc

Upregulated genes

Mfn1

Downregulated genes Biochemical reaction Macromolecular damage Transmembrane transport Enhenced aerobic metabolism mtDNA

Figure 7

A

Ten most abundant MtGs in each cluster, enriched GO processes and KEGG pathways 10 most abundant MtGs

GO

Pathway

mt-Nd1, Hspa8, Hsp90ab1, Atp5l, mt-Cytb, mtNd2, mt-Co1, mt-Rnr2, mt-Rnr1, Cox5b

Oxoacid metabolism, Transmembrane transport, Translation, Electron transport chain, Coenzyme metaboliam

Oxidative phosphorylation, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

Cluster 2

Slc25a5, mt-Nd4, mt-Nd5, Ckb, Cox6a1, Ppp1cc, Cox8a, Uqcrc1, Calm1, Cs

Oxoacid metabolism; Fatty acid metabolism; Cellular lipid metabolism;Coenzyme metaboliam; Translation

Fatty acid metabolism, Alzheimer's disease, Propanoate metabolism, Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, Parkinson's disease

Cluster 3

Atp5b; Atp5g3; Atp5a1; Hspd1; Prelid1; Slc2a3; Vdac1; Atp5f1; Atp5e; Phb2

Oxoacid metabolism; Cellular amino acid metabolism, Transmembrane transport,Oxidative phosphorylation, Nitrogen compound biosynthesis

Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Oxidative phosphorylation, Alzheimer's disease, Arginine, proline metabolism

Cluster 4

Rpl10a, Ywhae, Hspe1, Rpl23, Atp5h, Atp5g2, Ddx5, Cd24a, Uqcrh

Oxoacid metabolism; Apoptotic mitochondrial changes, Cellular amine metabolism; Mitochondrial transport; Cellular amino acid metabolism

Huntington's disease; Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; Arginine and proline metabolism; Oxidative phosphorylation

Cluster 5

Slc25a3, Ap2m1, Slc25a4, Atp5o Ndufb8, Atp5j, Ndufs3 Ndufb6, Gpx1, Mtx2

Electron transport chain; Response to reactive oxygen species; Transmembrane transport; Regulation of programmed cell death; Energy derivation by oxidation of organic compounds

Huntington's disease; Parkinson's disease; Alzheimer's disease, Oxidative phosphorylation; Insulin signaling pathway

Cluster 6

Stmn1, Cox7c, Sod1, Chchd2, Atp5j2, Idh2 Ndufa4, Ndufs2, Mdh1 Mtch1

Electron transport chain, Oxoacid metabolis, Fatty acid metabolism, Coenzyme metabolism, Cellular lipid metabolic process

Oxidative phosphorylation; Alzheimer's disease; Huntington's disease; Parkinson's disease; Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation

B

Expression levels (RPKM)

Cluster 1

200 150

100 50 0

Supplementary Fig. 1. Dynamic and functional profiling of MtGs during early development. (A) Ten most

abundant MtGs in each cluster of Figure 1A, as well as enriched functional processes based on Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses. (B) 3D-view of gene expression patterns of MtGs in each cluster of Figure 1A.

Supplementary Fig. 1