Highly dispersed platinum honeycomb reforming ... - Springer Link

3 downloads 0 Views 301KB Size Report
48, No. I, 315-323 (1992). RKCL2087. HIGHLY DISPERSED PLATINUM HONEYCOMB REFORMING CATALYSTS: SINTERING BEHAVIOR AND ACTIVITY a.
React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., Vol. 48, No. I, 315-323 (1992)

RKCL2087 HIGHLY

DISPERSED

PLATINUM

SINTERING F. F r u s t e r i

a,

HONEYCOMB

BEHAVIOR

A. P a r m a l i a n a b ,

CNR-TAE,

bDipartimento Messina C.P.

Salita

CATALYSTS:

AND ACTIVITY

A. M e z z a p l c a

P. T s i a k a r a s a * a n d aIstituto Italy

REFORMING

a

, A.L.

Chuvilin c,

N. Giordano a

S. Lucia

S. Lucia,

Messina,

di Chimica Industriale, U n i v e r s i t ~ degli 29, 98166 S. Agata, Messina, Italy

Studi di

CInstitute of Catalysis, Prospekt 630090 N o v o s i b i r s k 90, Russia

39,

98126

Akademika

Lavrentieva

5,

Received May 12, 1992 Accepted June 19, 1992

The influence

of chlorine

ment and of operation

conditions

tion of m e t h y l c y c l o h e x a n e chlorided

Pt/y-Al203

vestigated

by means

copy

(TEM).

The

the sintering

while

the reaction

honeycomb

by steam treat-

in the dehydrogenaon the dispersity

catalysts

of transmission

chlorine

testing

for the d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n

An original sensitive

of MCH on highly

in-

micros-

greatly

does not affect

structure

of

has been

electron

of small Pt crystallites

of the catalysts.

of the antipathetic Pt catalyst

(MCH)

loss of surface

motes

dispersities

regulation

pro-

( 0.85)

Pt/y-Al203 catalysts

e i t h e r in o x i d i z i n g or r e f o r m i n g conditions. N e i t h e r has the r e a c t i v i t y of small m e t a l p a r t i c l e s been a d e q u a t e l y addressed. s e n s i t i v e character, tion

Indeed,

in r e f o r m i n g c a t a l y s i s the c o n c e p t of s t r u c t u r e in-

g e n e r a l l y c l a i m e d for t y p i c a l d e h y d r o g e n a -

reactions, m e r i t s to be r e v i s e d for the c a t a l y t i c

with a metal dispersity Therefore,

systems

(D) h i g h e r than 0.5 [7].

this w o r k is aimed

(i) to i n v e s t i g a t e the sin-

tering of h i g h l y d i s p e r s e d Pt r e f o r m i n g c a t a l y s t s d u r i n g both the c h l o r i n e r e g u l a t i o n t r e a t m e n t and the o p e r a t i n g conditions, and

(ii) to g i v e

p r e l i m i n a r y insights into the i n f l u e n c e of

Pt p a r t i c l e size on the specific a c t i v i t y of r e f o r m i n g cata-

316

FRUSTERI et al. : HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

lysts

in the d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n

of MCH.

EXPERIMENTAL A 0.26% Pt/AI203 wet i m p r e g n a t i o n

solution a c c o r d i n g Catalysts

honeycomb

catalyst

of a w a s h - c o a t e d

to the p r o c e d u r e

For comparison,

(cat Z-l) was used.

catalyst

Z-I was

Z-2).

further

ticle

size was d e t e r m i n e d

ultrasonically

dispersed

ited on a thin carbon

flowing h y d r o g e n ticle

size

5 ~),

film s u p p o r t e d

at 400

~

and p r o c e d u r e differential frequency

Further

details

have been d e s c r i b e d

s -1)

in

the m e a n par-

formulae were used by sample.

were carried out at 400 operating

concerning

elsewhere

calculations,

depos-

copper grid.

for each c a t a l y s t

conversion measurements,

(TOF,

samples,

for 2 h. To estimate

flow f i x e d - b e d m i c r o r e a c t o r

pressure.

(JEOL I00 CX

on a standard

statistical

Pt par-

finely ground and

the samples were r e d u c e d

at least 500 p a r t i c l e s

in a c o n t i n u o u s

atmospheric

1 are listed

contents.

catalyst

Tests on the MCH d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n ~

the HCI ac-

In Table

using

(in ethanol)

(dn) , the normal

considering

method.

for 40 h

by d i s s o l u t i o n

by e l e c t r o n m i c r o s c o p y

Prior to the TEM m e a s u r e m e n t s

honeycomb

"as received"

acid and t i t r a t i n g

used w i t h their Pt and chlorine

TEM, point to point r e s o l u t i o n

[8].

a C-I

to d e c h l o r i n a t i o n

c o n t e n t was d e t e r m i n e d

sulfuric

to the V o l h a r d - C h a r p e n t e r

the c a t a l y s t s

0.24% Pt/AI203

An aliquot of the

subjected

The chlorine

of the c a t a l y s t w i t h cording

elsehwere

for 15 and 40 h, r e s p e c -

a commercial

catalyst

(cat.

described

~

by

with a H2PtCI 6

C-2 and C-3 were o b t a i n e d by treating

sample in a wetted N~ flow at 500 tively.

(C-l) was p r e p a r e d

honeycomb

[83.

suitable

at

the apparatus In addition,

for turnover

have been performed.

RESULTS AND D I S C U S S I O N Sintering (PSD's)

of the

behavior. "fresh"

shown in Fig. I. despite

being

reduction

The p a r t i c l e

C-l,

It is w o r t h n o t i n g

subjected

at 400 ~

size d i s t r i b u t i o n s

C-2 and C-3 c a t a l y s t

that the c a t a l y s t

to c a l c i n a t i o n

presents

samples

at 500 ~

an a p p r e c i a b l e

are

C-l,

and s u b s e q u e n t

retention

of 317

FRUSTERI et al.: HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

Table Chlorine

regulation

Catalyst

i

of P t / y - A I 2 0 3

Pt content

C1 content

(wt. %)

(wt. %)

C-I

0

0.24

1.75

C-2

15

0.24

0.95

C-3

40

0.24

0.53

Z-I

0

0.26

1.00

Z-2

40

0.26

0.50

(see Table

by a q u a s i - u n i m o d a l lower than

PSD c o m p r i s i n g

to the chlorine

sintering

a wide b r o a d e n i n g fact,

i) and a high Pt d i s p e r s i t y

at 400 ~

(see Table

with d

of this

i), causes

of the small Pt c r y s t a l l i t e s

n sample,

a sig-

w h i c h allows

in the PSD's of the C-2 and C-3 samples.

such s a m p l e s d i s p l a y

w i t h particle

loss

characterized

Pt c r y s t a l l i t e s

i0 ~. The steam t r e a t m e n t

in addition nificant

time

catalysts

(h)

chlorine

Treatment

honeycomb

a non-homogeneous

sizes in the range of 4-30 ~

In

Pt d i s t r i b u t i o n (cat. C-2)

and 8-40

(cat. C-3). Moreover, values,

the mean particle

summarized

in Table

2, evidence

Z-i c a t a l y s t does not undergo chlorination is similar

treatment,

a relationship

stability,

for the c o m m e r c i a l

In order to r a t i o n a l i z e

500 ~

chlorine

C-l,

unaffected

content

loss we

and Pt

C-2 and C-3 c a t a l y s t s by the chlorine

such findings,

chlorine

of our c a t a l y s t s

are very

[5]. Then, 318

between

(Table i). Therefore,

the de-

loss,

Z-I catalyst.

count that the Pt(IV) on the surface

effect during

though the extent of its chlorine

for the highly d i s p e r s e d

and a r e m a r k a b l e

that the c o m m e r c i a l

any sintering

to that of the s~mple C-I

have o b s e r v e d mobility

sizes and m e t a l d i s p e r s i t y

stable

containing during

in the p r e s e n c e

we take into ac-

complexes

[5], formed

the air c a l c i n a t i o n

at

of steam up to 600 ~

we argue that the d e c h l o r i n a t i o n

of our r e f o r m i n g

FRUSTERI et al.: HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

100 0

~

8O

50

o"

4O

2o

H

L.

0

"

4

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 35 40

8 12 16 20 2/, 28 32 36 40

dn(~)

100

80 60

,-

0

40 ',

20

4 8 1216202428323640 dn(~) Fig.

i.

Particle C-2

size d i s t r i b u t i o n

(b) and C-3

of "fresh"

(c) Pt/y-Al203

C-I

honeycomb

(a), cata-

lysts catalysts

involves

only the depletion

the AI203

surface.

Such a lower

ults

in a higher

mobility better

surface

chlorine

containing

Then,

Pt complexes,

to explain

to hypothesize

that it occurs

face m i g r a t i o n

of Pt particles.

content

Pt crystallites chlorine

content)

chlorine

Pt complexes

of catalyst (4 ~), while

C-I

content

nor their

the lower

to a

obvious

step by sur-

the higher

the m i g r a t i o n

surface

of the C-2 and C-3 samples

of

mobility

it seems

the reduction

impedes

res-

leading

surface

In particular,

to

favor the

the d e c o m p o s i t i o n

the Pt sintering, during

anchored

which would

if neither

can be invoked

chlorine

surface

availability

of the c h l o r i n e - c o n t a i n i n g

Pt distribution.

of chlorine

acidity

weakens

of small (lower

the in319

FRUSTERI et al. : HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

Table Mean particles

2

size and Pt d i s p e r s i o n honeycomb

Catalyst

of P t / y - A l 2 0 3

catalysts

Mean p a r t i c l e size

Dpt

(~)

(~)

C-i

5

I00

C-2

13

82

C-3

21

60

C-I after testing

10

i00

C-2 after testing

14

80

C-3 after testing

18

63

Z-I

50

23

Z-2

53

22

teraction favoring

between

Pt crystallites. ples,

surface

the m o b i l i t y

The a n a l o g o u s

also c o n t r o l l e d according

w i t h the support

higher

than 500

samples

in Fig.

Pt/y-Al203

which

availability.

catalysts [9].

is

In fact,

for larger Pt

growth can occur at T

the PSD's of the C-l,

in MCH d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n

2. By c o m p a r i n g

only

Pt/Al203

signals

a larger number of i n t e r a c t i o n

i, it g e n e r a l l y preserve

contents,

[9], we think that

In addition,

conditions,

of the

of Z-I and Z-2 sam-

c r y s t a l l i t e size

and further

6 h testing

catalysts

cal r e f o r m i n g sintering,

~

after

are shown in Fig.

320

et al.

(>50 ~) there exists

points

reported

"initial"

support [2],

agglomeration

chlorine

on the c h l o r i d e d

by the

to S t r a g u z z i

particles

and AI203

dispersity

in spite of their d i f f e r e n t

that the Pt m o b i l i t y

C-3

Pt species

and the c o n s e q u e n t

these patterns emerges

C-2 and

at 400 ~

w i t h those

that our c h l o r i d e d

their high d i s p e r s i t i e s

in typi-

sample C-I e x p e r i e n c e s a s l i g h t

in any case does not affect

the Pt surface

FRUSTERI et al.: HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

100

100 SO

80

,-

60

60

~

40

40

v

0

B

i,

200~ , 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40

4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 dn(.~)

100 80 0

'-

60

~s

4o

L,-

u_

20

4 8 12 IB Z0 24 2B 32 38 40

dn(~) Fig.

2.

Particle and C-3

size d i s t r i b u t i o n (c) P t / y - A l 2 0 3

ter t e s t i n g

Catalytic

activity

of the c r y s t a l l i t e catalysts

honeycomb

(a), C-2

size on the

dehydrogenation. specific

studied

[7] c l a i m i n g

crystal

[i0]. No d a t a are a v a i l a b l e

its s t r u c t u r e

at 400

The

activity

dehydrogenation

sensitivity

af~

influence

of n o b l e m e t a l

has b e e n

on this

(b)

catalysts

in M C H d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n

in M C H

in c y c l o h e x a n e

of C-I

extensively

on a Pt s i n g l e

issue

for M C H de-

hydrogenation. In T a b l e genation

3 are

at 400

~

summarized on d i f f e r e n t

the TOF v a l u e s

for M C H d e h y d r o -

sized Pt/y-Al203

honeycomb

catalysts. For Pt m e a n p a r t i c l e TOF v a l u e

of ca.

sizes

5 s -I has b e e n

ranging between found,

while

5 and

on l a r g e r

21 ~ a Pt c r y s -

321

FRUSTERI et al. : HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

Table TOF values

3

for MCH d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n honeycomb

Catalyst

at 400 ~

on P t ~ - A I 2 0 3

catalysts

Mean particle

size

TOF

(~) C-I

(s-1)

5

5.0

C-2

13

4.8

C-3

21

5.4

Z-I

50

13.0

Z-2

53

12.0

tallites

(50-53 ~)

findings

are d i a g n o s t i c

character

it equals

ca.

12-13 s -I. These p r e l i m i n a r y

of an a n i t p a t h e t i c

[7] of MCH d e h y d r o g e n a t i o n

structure

of highly d i s p e r s e d

forming catalysts.

Such an unusual c r y s t a l l i t e

could be e x p l a i n e d

by assuming

(D > 0.5) both the ensemble in d e t e r m i n i n g

re-

size dependence

that for high m e t a l d i s p e r s i o n s

and e l e c t r o n i c

the o b s e r v e d negative

size on the specific

sensitive

effects

influence

[7] concur

of particle

activity.

REFERENCES I. 2.

K. Foger, J.P.

H. Jaeger:

Bournonville,

G. Martino:

B. D e l m o n and G.F. Publ., 3.

J.P.

Amsterdam

M.J.

Krueger: 5.

J. Catal.,

322

III",

H. Lieske, 81,

p.

(1985).

159. Elsevier

G. Martino:

G. Poncelet, Publ.

B.V.,

Science

17

109,

407

P. Grange,

C.J.

P.A.

Jacobs

1983.

Carr,

M.H.

(1988).

H. Spindler,

(1983).

in "Prepara-

Amsterdam

Jr., D a v i d R. Monroe,

J. Catal.,

G. Lietz,

170

in "Catalyst D e a c t i v a t i o n "

(Eds)

J.P. Franck,

81. E l s e v i e r

D'Anielle,

96,

1980.

tion of C a t a l y s t s

4.

Froment

Bournonville,

(Eds), p.

J. Catal.,

W. Hanke,

J. Volter:

FRUSTERI et al. : HONEYCOMB CATALYSTS

6.

J. Barbier,

7.

M. Che,

D. Bahlou,

P. Marecot:

Catal.

Lett.,

8,

327

(1991). C.O.

H. Pines, Inc., 8.

A. Parmaliana,

i0.

G.I.

iii,

Straguzzi,

171

(1980).

R.K.

Herz,

J. Catal.,

Advances

P.B. Weisz,

San Diego

J. Catal., 9.

Bennett:

W.D. 67,

Eds),

in Catalysis

Vol.

(D.D. Eley,

36, p. 55. Academic

Press.

1989. F. Frusteri, 235 H.R.

Aduriz,

Gillespie, 371

A. Mezzapica,

N. Giordano:

(1988). C.E.

E.E.

Gigola:

Petersen,

J. Catal., G.A.

6_~6,

Somorjai:

(1981).

323