Indirect Hemagglutination Test for Pseudorabies Antibody

1 downloads 0 Views 387KB Size Report
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Pathology and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine,. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Mar. 1980, p. 217-219 0095-1 137/80/03-0217/03$02.00/0

Vol. 11, No. 3

Indirect Hemagglutination Test for Pseudorabies Antibody Detection in Swinet KEITH HAFFER, D. P. GUSTAFSON,* AND C. L. KANITZ Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Pathology and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

An indirect hemagglutination test for the detection of antibodies in swine serum specific for pseudorabies virus is described. The indirect hemagglutination test was less time consuming than the standardized virus neutralization test while being highly sensitive and accurate. Serum samples that were toxic to virus neutralization indicator cells were readily tested in the indirect hemagglutination test. The indirect hemagglutination test may also be more sensitive than the virus neutralization test for determining early titers in pseudorabies virus infections. Complete methodology is described.

Pseudorabies virus (PrV) infection of swine has produced major economic losses to swine producers in the United States in recent years due to the increased incidence and severity of this herpetic disease (2, 4, 6). The screening of sera for PrV-specific antibodies by the virus neutralization (VN) test is presently being used (4). Although the VN test is accurate, it requires several days for completion, expertise to conduct it, and a laboratory equipped for tissue culture (3). Also, serum samples may be toxic to the indicator cells in the test, and a second serum sample must be obtained-to determine PrV serodiagnosis. Indirect hemagglutination (IHA) tests have been used for serodiagnosis of other herpesvirus infections (7, 9, 10). IHA tests can be performed with common laboratory equipment and with average technical skill in 1 to 2 h. The tests are accurate and are not affected by cytotoxic sera. The IHA test also measures serum immunoglobulin M levels reliably in herpesvirus infections (1). Immunoglobulin M levels indicate early infections and may not be detected with other tests (10). This paper describes the adaptation of the IHA test (9) for the detection of PrV antibodies in swine serum. The IHA test was demonstrated to be more accurate and less time consuming than the VN test and was also able to effectively test samples which were toxic in the VN system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Serum samples. Samples were obtained from PrVinfected swine, isolated controls, and field submissions to the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University. All sera were heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min, and 1.0 ml t Journal paper no. 7828, Agricultural Experiment Station, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. 217

of each was absorbed with 0.1 ml of a 50% suspension of washed sheep erythrocytes. VN tests. All sera were heat inactivated and tested for PrV antibodies with a microtitration VN test (4). PrV antigen. The Sullivan strain of PrV (50% tissue culture infective dose, 108/ml) was propagated and irradiated with 60Co as described elsewhere (8). The antigen preparation was pelleted at 50,000 x g for 30 min and resuspended to its original volume in 0.15 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 6.7. Preparation of tanned sheep erythrocytes. Sheep blood was collected in Alsever solution and aged 1 to 3 weeks before use. After the buffy coat was removed, erythrocytes were washed three times in 0.15 M PBS (pH 7.2) and resuspended in the same buffer to a 2.5% suspension. An equal volume of a 1:20,000 dilution of tannic acid was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The cells were centrifuged at 800 x g for 10 min, washed once with PBS, (pH 7.2), and resuspended to a 2.5% suspension in 0.15 M PBS (pH 6.7). Sensitization of tanned erythrocytes. One volume of PrV antigen, suspended in PBS (pH 6.7), was added to one volume of tanned erythrocytes and incubated at 37°C for 30 min (the optimal antigen concentration was previously determined to be 5 x 107 50% tissue culture infective doses of PrV antigen for 10 ml of 2.5% tanned erythrocytes). Cells were washed twice in PBS (7.2) and resuspended to a 1% suspension in PBS (pH 7.2) containing 1% normal rabbit serum, which had previously been heat inactivated and absorbed with sheep erythrocytes. IHA test. Twofold dilutions of serum in 0.025 ml, with 1% normal rabbit serum in PBS as the diluent, were made in U-bottomed Linbro microtitration plates (Flow Laboratories, Hamden, Conn.). Sensitized erythrocytes (0.025 ml) were added to each dilution. Plates were sealed with plastic tape, shaken, and incubated at room temperature for 2 h and then read or refrigerated until read. Erythrocyte settling patterns were read as positive if agglutination of cells was 80% or more of the bottom of the well. Smaller agglutination patterns were read as plus-minus, and buttoning of erythrocytes was read as negative. The IHA titer of

218

J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.

HAFFER, GUSTAFSON, AND KANITZ

a serum was the highest dilution which caused positive agglutination. Known PrV-positive and -negative controls were run with each test, as were erythrocyte controls and serum dilutions with tanned nonsensitized erythrocytes.

RESULTS commonly use procelaboratories Diagnostic dures to screen swine sera for neutralizing antibodies to PrV at dilutions of 1:4 to 1:32. Any serum that neutralizes virus, inclusive of these dilutions, is designated PrV positive, although further titrations may be utilized to ascertain specific titers. The IHA test for PrV was standardized with test sera so that positive agglutination at a 1:4 serum dilution or above was also considered as positive for PrV antibodies. All samples that were positive in the VN test were also positive in the IHA test. However, the IHA test indicated that a small number of samples were PrV positive which were negative by the VN test (Table 1). Samples that were toxic to the indicator cells in the VN test did not affect readability of the IHA test. However, IHA results had to be compared with retests on nontoxic VN serum from these swine, submitted 2 to 10 weeks later. On the second or third retest of these swine, all were negative in the VN test. Sera were not available for IHA retesting, but of the original toxic samples many were positive (Table 2) and had titers of 1:32 or 1:64. An optimum antigen concentration for sensi-

tizing erythrocytes was essential for the sensitivity and reproducibility of the IHA test. In our experiments, irradiated and live virus worked equally well at a concentration of 5 x 107 50% tissue culture infective doses to 10 ml of tanned 2.5% erythrocytes.

DISCUSSION Serodiagnosis is essential for detection and control of PrV infections. Diagnostic tests for PrV include a microimmunodiffusion test (3), which has sensitivity of low order, and a VN test, which is presently being used (4). The VN test is time consuming, requires specialized laboratory conditions, and cannot test samples which are toxic to the indicator test cells. The IHA test for detection of PrV antibodies was compared with the VN test for sensitivity and accuracy on serum samples obtained from experimental and private swine populations. The IHA test results correlated 100% with sera which were positive in the VN test (Table 1). The IHA test also readily tested sera which were toxic in VN tests. The IHA test, however, detected positive samples which were considered negative by the VN test. These discrepancies in test results for these samples may be due to greater sensitivity for certain antibody classes in the IHA test than is possible in the VN test. The sensitivity of the IHA test for detecting small amounts of immunoglobulin M classes of immunoglobulins in herpesvirus infections has been demonstrated previously (1). The accuracy of the IHA tests depends on the TABLE 1. Comparisons between the VN and IHA absorption of test sera with sheep erythrocytes tests for detection of PrV-specific antibodies in to remove all antibodies against sheep-specific swine serum antigens. The testing of absorbed serum diluNo. PrV positivee" (4 positive) tions against nonsensitized erythrocytes should Serum sample" not show the presence of any agglutination. If IHA test VN test agglutination occurs above the undiluted serum Nontoxic in VN 61/232 (26.29) 68/232 (29.31) level, the serum should be further absorbed with test more erythrocytes. Toxic in VN test" 0/64 (0.0)' 10/64 (15.63) The IHA test is a convenient and readily aSera were obtained from experimental and private utilizable diagnostic tool for detection of PrVspecific antibodies. Although we used fresh herds. h Sixty-one of sixty-one (100%) of VN-positive sera erythrocytes, cells may be glutaraldehyde fixed were also positive by IHA. and stored frozen until needed (5, 10). The adToxic to VN indicator cells. aptation of the IHA test for detecting PrV or " Determined from the second or third serum sub- reinforcing VN test results, and for testing toxic missions from these swine 2 to 10 weeks after serum sera, is encouraged. toxicity was determined. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

TABLE 2. Titers of sera positive by IHA and negative by VN

This work was supported in part under cooperative agreement 58-519B-9-818 with the Science and Education Administration of the U. S. I)epartment of Agriculture.

No. of sera at dilution: Serum sample

Nontoxic Toxic

1:4 2 4

1:8 3 2

1:1(3 1

1:32

1:64

l 1

3

LITERATURE CITED Hoffman, and E. H. Lennette. 1978. Analysis of antibocly assay niethotis and classes of viral antihodies in serodiiagnosis of of cytomegalovirus infec-

1. Cremer, N. E., M.

VOL. 11, 1980

IHA FOR PSEUDORABIES ANTIBODY IN SWINE

tion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 8:153-159. 2. Dillman, R. C., and J. J. Andrews. 1974. Pseudorabies in Iowa swine: an increasing problem. Proc. Annu. Meet. Am. Assoc. Vet. Lab. Diag. 17:145-155. 3. Gutekunst, C., E. C. Pirtle, and W. L. Mengeling. 1978. Development and evaluation of a microimmunodiffusion test for detection of antibodies to Pseudorabies virus in swine serum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:207-210. 4. Hill, H. T., R. A. Crandell, C. L. Kanitz, J. P. McAdaragh, G. L. Seawright, R. F. Solorzano, and W. S. Stewart. 1977. Recommended minimum standards for diagnostic tests employed in the diagnosis of Pseudorabies (Aujeszky's Disease), p. 375-390. American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 20th Annual Proceedings. American Association of Veterinary Diagnosticians, Madison, Wis. 5. Palmer, D. F., J. J. Cavallaro, K. Herrmann, J. Stewart, and K. W. Wells (ed.). 1974. A procedural guide to the serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalic inclusion disease, herpes simplex. Immunol Ser. 5:

219

23-56. 6. Stewart, W. C. 1975. Is Pseudorabies (Aujeszky disease) increasing in the United States?, p. 15-22. In Proceedings, Symposium on Pseudorabies. Livestock Conservation Institute, Omaha, Nebr. 7. Stewart, J. A., and K. L. Herrmann. 1976. Herpes simplex virus, p. 416-420. In N. R. Rose and H. Friedman (ed.), Manual of clinical immunology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C. 8. Sun, I. L., D. P. Gustafson, and G. Scherba. 1978. Comparison of Pseudorabies virus inactivated by bromoethylene-imine, 'Co irradiation, and acridine dye in immune assay systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 8:604-611. 9. Waner, J. L., T. H. Weller, and J. A. Stewart. 1976. Cytomegalovirus, p. 423-427. In N. R. Rose and H. Friedman (ed.), Manual of clinical immunology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C. 10. Yeager, A. S. 1979. Improved indirect hemagglutination test for cytomegalovirus using human 0 erythrocytes in lysine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 10:64-68.