Institutionalization of accrual accounting in the ...

1 downloads 0 Views 169KB Size Report
Abstract. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the institutionalization of an accrual accounting system in the Indonesian public sector.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1832-5912.htm

Institutionalization of accrual accounting in the Indonesian public sector Harun Harun

Accrual accounting

257

Faculty of Economics, Tadulako University, Tadulako, Indonesia, and

Karen Van Peursem and Ian Eggleton School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the institutionalization of an accrual accounting system in the Indonesian public sector. Design/methodology/approach – The authors undertake a case study to gain insights relating to the critical features of the institutionalization process of the accrual accounting system (AAS) in one Indonesian public sector municipality. The data are drawn from official documents of the Indonesian Government and from publicly available information about the accrual adoption processes. The authors also interviewed key actors who were involved in the accrual accounting policy formulation, standards development and implementation. The data under investigation cover the period from 1983 to 2010. Findings – The IPM of Dambrin, Lambert and Sponem is employed to evaluate the process by which an AAS was idealized, standardized, implemented and used in one Indonesian municipality. Scott’s pillars of legitimization also inform rationales behind practice. This study reveals how the decision of the Indonesian Government to adopt accrual accounting in 2003 was part of greater political and economic reforms following the financial and political crisis that occurred in 1998. Idealized in the early 1980s by technocrats in the Ministry of Finance, accrual accounting practices were deferred and then enabled by a series of national political events. Their ultimate internalization into our municipality was led by new legislation but also influenced by the habits and histories of the Indonesian local context and was as a result decoupled in many respects from ideals, discourses and techniques established for it. Research limitations/implications – The findings should be understood in the economic, social and historical context of Indonesia. Findings offered here may differ from other applications due to the nature of the economic, social and political contexts. Originality/value – Uniquely employing the IPM model, and drawing from a context which has undergone significant political change but which has benefitted from little research, this study contributes to an understanding of the institutionalization and legitimization process of an accrual accounting system in an emerging-economy public sector. Findings demonstrate how notions of politics and power inform the complexity of institutionalization in this unique political-economic environment. Keywords Accrual accounting, Institutionalization, Indonesia, Efficiency, Transparency, Accounting Paper type Research paper

The authors would like to thank Professors Jan Bell and Prem Sikka and other participants at the Second Global Accounting and Organisational Change Conference in Boston 2010 for their comments and advice. The authors’ sincere thanks also go to Professors James Guthrie and Jesse Dillard for the suggestions they provided during their recent visits to the University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. The authors would also like to thank Professor Stewart Lawrence and other participants for their comments at a seminar held by the Department of Accounting, University of Waikato in April 2010. Finally, the authors give special thanks to the anonymous reviewers of this journal who provided informative and constructive comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change Vol. 8 No. 3, 2012 pp. 257-285 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1832-5912 DOI 10.1108/18325911211258308

JAOC 8,3

258

1. Introduction Political reforms and shifts in political power tend to influence accounting and managerial systems in the public sector generally (Mimba et al., 2007; Chang, 2009). Such influence may also be felt in developing nations. This certainly appears to be the case in Indonesia where accounting system change has occurred in a nation marked by instability and radical change over the last 13-20 years. Under previous administrations, including the Suharto era (1966-1998), the highest office holders (the President and Parliamentary members) as well as governors and mayors at the local level were elected only from state-approved parties (Baswedan, 2007; Fitrani et al., 2005). After the Suharto regime collapse in 1998, reforms occurred which allowed all parties to be represented and were a step in Indonesia’s somewhat uneven movements toward establishment as a modern democratic state. Successive administrations have imposed reform on Indonesian systems, laws and practices. In the Indonesian public sector, such reforms have resulted in movements to decentralize local government management and to “improve” the quality of public sector reporting. In accordance with statutory law approved after 1998, changes were made to the role of Central Government in creating greater independence for its members and in requiring reports that are in accordance with internationally-inspired accounting standards. Many of the government’s initiatives appeared to draw from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2001) and the World Bank as guidance for policies designed to achieve better governance and transparency (Nasution, 2008). These reforms were undertaken by a number of post-Suharto administrations including those led by Presidents B.J. Habibie (1998-1998), Abdurrahman Wahid (1999-2001), Megawati Sukarnoputri (2001-2004) and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (2004-2009, 2009-2011). Under the banner of conducting meaningful change, public budgeting and operational outcomes are now reported, scrutinized and audited in accordance with the managerial practices similar to those used by the private sector. The adoption of the accrual accounting system (AAS) in the Indonesian public sector is thus part of an international trend at the time to ensure that public officials are held to account and that public money is used efficiently and effectively (Alam, 1997; Guthrie, 1998; Ryan, 1999; Saleh and Pendlebury, 2006). Despite such lofty ambitions, studies on such public sector accounting reforms in developed nations – such as Australia and UK – indicate no clear benefits from their adoption (Carlin, 2005; Connolly and Hyndman, 2006; Christensen, 2007). In some cases such changes have wrought unintended, and undesirable, outcomes (Vamosi, 2000; Hassan, 2005; Othman et al., 2006; Andon et al., 2007, Norhayati and Siti-Nabiha, 2009). For example, the adoption of an activity based-costing system in a public sector (company) in Portugal was met with resistance from production engineers and rejection by workers (Major and Hopper, 2005). Similar problems were found to have occurred in a Malaysian public sector organisation by Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007) where institutionalization created conflict and tension among workers. Chow et al. (2007, p. 48) conclude that the global enthusiasm for adopting business-style accounting systems in a public sector context is “[. . .] not supported by strong, detailed empirical evidence”. Drawing from these patterns, and the concerns they raise, it appears that implementing business-style accounting techniques provides no guarantee that efficiency, transparency or effectiveness will occur in response. As Ter Bogt and Van Helden (2000) and Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007) find, the rules about accounting reporting systems may change

and new types of reports may be produced, but these changes do not necessarily improve the attitudes and behaviour of people using them. Therefore, it is important for policy makers and accounting researchers to see the adoption of a private style accounting system as not merely instrumental but also to understand it within its managerial, organizational and social contexts (Bale and Dale, 1998). This is our concern in asking the how one municipality in the Indonesian public sector responds to the imposition of a private-like sector accounting in the post-Suharto era. The paper is structured as follows: the research objective is stated and prior literature is discussed, the theoretical framework and focus of the investigation are then introduced. Methods and data analysis are presented, findings are drawn, theoretical implications of the study’s findings are presented and then conclusions and contributions of the study are clarified. Finally, the paper indicates limitations of the study and suggestions for future studies. 2. Research objective and prior literature This study examines the institutionalization of an AAS in one local government of the Indonesian public sector. Drawing on this purpose the research questions of the study are as follows: RQ1. How and why has the AAS been adopted? RQ2. How has the AAS been implemented in one municipal government? By answering these questions this study will place these events within a social, economic and political context so as to demonstrate the imposition of AAS on one administration within a rapidly-changing developing nation. This study responds to calls for better understandings of the process and implications of a government’s decision to adopt business style accounting techniques in the public sector. Siti-Nabiha and Scapens (2005) and Chow et al. (2007) suggest that such studies not only need to look at the process of institutionalization at the macro level, but also the dynamic features of its institutionalization within an organization. This is important as the features and the institutionalization of an accounting system depend on the actions of actors at the social and organizational levels (Dillard et al., 2004). Such research in developing economies is also needed (Marwata, 2006; Sharma and Lawrence, 2008; Rahaman, 2009). Prior Indonesian studies on post-Suharto public sector accounting are limited to examining legal frameworks and accounting techniques employed (Prodjoharjono, 1999; Marwata, 2006), and potential problems encountered at the national level (Harun, 2007). Although these studies and the concerns they raise have provided reasons to further examine public sector accounting reforms, the institutionalization of such reforms is yet to be understood. There is also a substantial literature that challenges the appropriateness of using business-style systems for public sector organizations generally, some of the more recent of which include, for example, Christensen and Parker (2010), Van Peursem (2009), Christiaens and Rommel (2008), Christensen (2007), Connolly and Hyndman (2006) and Carlin (2005). Public sector accounting research itself has now ventured beyond economic-based theories and has adopted social theory to explain complexities and to uncover roles of power and interest in policy formulation and accounting technology (Covaleski et al., 1993; Rebiero and Scapens, 2005; Nor-Aziah and Scapens, 2007; Hopper and Major, 2007; Monteiro and Aibar-Guzman, 2010). Studies in a number of Western nations have

Accrual accounting

259

JAOC 8,3

260

emerged from this trend, some finding that political reforms and shifts in political power affect economic and managerial arrangements in the public sector (Ryan, 1999; Guthrie, 1998; Lapsley and Pallot, 2000; Siti-Nabiha and Scapens, 2005; Mimba et al., 2007; Chang, 2009). In this sense: [. . .] accounting scholarship is undergoing a reconceptualization in part due to the empirical failure of efficient market theory, agency theory and contingency theory to provide rationales for developing accounting techniques and systems (Dillard et al., 2004, p. 506).

This study also draws on social frameworks to contextualize and explain the need, opportunity and rationales surrounding the institutionalization of accrual accounting into an Indonesian public sector municipality. 3. Theoretical framework One theoretical informant that has been used to evaluate public sector accounting reforms is New Institutional Sociology (NIS). As claimed and practiced by, for example, Covaleski et al. (1993), Broadbent and Laughlin (2005), Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007), Dambrin et al. (2007) and Norhayati and Siti-Nabiha (2009), NIS provides a valuable lens to inform the process of organizational and accounting change. It is said have particular resonance in the public sector because of the need for budgeted organizations to achieve legitimacy with its public fund provider (Fowler, 2009, p. 172). Findings on such matters have indeed emerged. Over a decade ago now, Lapsley and Pallot (2000) used NIS to investigate changes in public sector reporting systems in New Zealand and the UK to discover external legitimation practices and economic pressures. Ter Bogt and Van Helden (2000) applied NIS in The Netherlands’ public sector to find that accrual was made mandatory but did not necessarily translate into practice. It seems that simple adoption of a new accounting practice cannot therefore be assumed to change real attitudes or real practices in the public sector. These studies also highlight the value of examining the social and political contexts in which such public sector accounting policy is formed. In Canada, Baker and Rennie (2006) used NIS to evaluate public sector accrual accounting practices in the Canadian Central Government. Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007) employed NIS to investigate institutionalization in the Malaysian public sector accounting to find that adoption is neither linear nor simple. Also in Malaysia, Norhayati and Siti-Nabiha (2009) found that that the intention to institutionalize a new performance measurement system cannot be realised if there is a lack of (external) pressure, and they point to isomorphic and mimetic influences that lead to ceremonial adoption (also see Burns and Scapens (2000) and Sharma and Lawrence (2005) on similar points). Durocher and Fortin (2010) examine legitimacy motivations in the Canadian Accounting Standards Board to find the presence of cultural – cognitive legitimacy pressures from the USA and internationally. Together, these studies suggest to us that there is a reason to engage in research that looks at broad landscapes within specific contexts and to understand the motivation of actors involved. Although NIS-based studies have been useful in explaining change at the organizational field or level (DiMaggio, 1987; Norhayati and Siti-Nabiha, 2009), “[. . .] less theoretical consideration is given either to the processes whereby new institutional practices are established, transposed and decomposed [within their] [. . .] political context” (Dillard et al., 2004, p. 507). This is important because the direction that the

institutionalization process takes “[. . .] depends precisely on the power of the organizational actors’ translation and use of societal expectations” (Dillard et al., 2004, p. 510). Hopper and Major (2007) also suggest that new practices are framed within their larger social, economic and political parameters and are promoted by strategic actors outside the organization. Therefore, and so as to provide a fuller understanding of the complexities of institutionalization, change should be recognised as part of a broader political engagement (Dillard et al., 2004, p. 510). Taking a broad view would certainly seem to be appropriate for a public sector organization established within governmental policy. Decoupling is also found to be associated with adopting new structures. As Ribeiro and Scapens (2006, p. 97) state, the “[. . .] formal structures and procedures [. . .] acquire legitimacy and guarantee the resources required [. . .] but they are detached from the everyday organization activities”. Durocher and Fortin (2010, p. 497) also found decoupling in their study of a public sector organization. As such decoupling phenomena should be taken into account in fully understanding the complexity of accounting practices within organizations. Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007) call for research into accounting system institutionalization within developing nations, and this study heeds that call within an Indonesian context. The context is primarily of the post-Suharto Indonesian political environment as applied to public sector accounting systems reform. We examine how and why actors come to institutionalize a new accrual system. Institutionalization provides the broad theoretical framework for the study and the Dambrin et al.’s (2007) institutionalization process model (IPM) particularlizes the process by which institutionalization of an AAS occurs. Drawn from a previous model developed by Hasselbladh and Kallinikos (2000) and Dambrin et al. (2007) offer a framework of particular value to this project because it is concerned with process; in particular with how techniques are diffused, developed, adopted and implemented as a social construct. According to Dambrin et al. (2007) and in order to obtain a complete picture, four stages are said to occur: (1) dissemination of new ideals; (2) elaboration of new ideals into policy development (new discourses); (3) development of specific management tools based on new ideals (new techniques); and (4) implementation of specified techniques (internalization) (Table I). The first stage – the dissemination of new ideals – are said to normally begin outside the organization, and later stages are usually internal (also see related discussions in, for example, Dillard et al. (2004)). This may occur in a public sector because certain external authorities are influential in establishing reporting policy. So for example, the ADB may make demands on a nation prior to providing loans for development. This expectation is shown in Figure 1. According to Dambrin et al. (2007) however, institutionalization is not complete until “discourses” and “techniques” have been engaged and until “internalization” has occurred. For an institutionalization process to be “successful” therefore there must be a coherent link between new ideals, new discourses and new techniques (see Kostova and Roth (2002) for a related discussion). That is, an active adoption of accrual accounting occurs only

Accrual accounting

261

JAOC 8,3 Ideals

262

Table I. Stages of institutionalization

Figure 1. Stages of institutionalization

Management culture

Distribution of power

Ambiguous A perverted conception of innovation is slowly emerging (through replication concerns)

Conflicting Shift towards a bypassing of both the doctor and the drug representative

Accountability principles

Conflicting Promotion of a more managerial conception of accountability (sellerside vs scientific side of the drug representative’s job) Discourse In discourse, profitability The dominant department Discourse requiring a is either a means or an end clearly remains the sales greater level of commercial depending on the target department efficiency from drug audience representative is developed Performance measurement Techniques Marketing techniques Recruitment of “less and remuneration system designed to satisfy new scientific profiles” in the become increasingly replication concerns (e.g. sales and marketing profit measurement of departments. Recruitment similar to the one used in of management controllers the consumer goods promotional operations) from the consumer goods industry (behaviour-based added to result-based industry as vectors for assessment) change Internalisation Loose coupling Decoupling Decoupling Decoupling is maintained Techniques are partly used Sales department retains the right to have the final because of both legal and in a ceremonial way but they seem to be say in the decision-making organisational culture constraints increasingly accepted process Source: Dambrin et al. (2007, p. 177)

Source: Dambrin et al. (2007, p. 178)

when the actors “[. . .] view the practice as valuable and become committed to the practice” (Dambrin et al., 2007, p. 176). When institutionalization fails, a policy’s intent may be lost. That is, and according to Dambrin et al. (2007, p. 176): “[. . .] without internalisation, there is loose coupling or decoupling and practices are adopted on a ceremonial basis”. Thus, the success of the institutionalization process lies in the internalization of the rationales for which the new system was required and can only be compete if the initial ideals (such as using “accrual” to improve efficiency and accountability in a public sector) are reflected in the actions of people who adopt it. Institutionalization occurs when “[. . .] the rules are coherently linked to the actions (routines) of actors [in a specific organization]” (Burns and Scapens, 2000, p. 6).

There is thus a relationship, and an order, between new ideals, new discourses, new techniques and internalization (Dambrin et al., 2007, p. 178). Dambrin et al. (2007) found that the process of institutionalization of a management control system in a pharmaceutical company was implemented by managers as a means of enhancing efficiency. However, they also found that it is difficult for a new system to be internalized where existing practices coexist with the emerging ideals, and systems of control occur in ways not intended. They highlighted how discourses of organisational actors even go so far as to contradict the ideals and control techniques intended for the systems (Dambrin et al., 2007, p. 201). Thus, and as applied to the institutionalization of an AAS in a public sector organization, the Dambrin et al. (2007) IPM model is useful to focus the investigation on processes such as: . the formation and communication of the need to implement an AAS (new ideals); . a mobilization by government and lobbyists to create policy that is consistent with that need (new discourses); . the formulation of standards, rules and procedures (new techniques); and . the production of such reports, their dissemination and their use in a manner and for a purpose consistent with this intent (internalization).

Accrual accounting

263

In other words, the institutionalization process of a new accounting system may be formally adopted, but it is another matter as to whether it is also used to produce or apply accounting information in the way intended. Table II illustrates the focus of this investigation in terms of institutionalizaton. 4. Methods and data analysis This study uses a case study to provide a deep analysis of one institutional practice. As Yin (2009) states, a case study is useful when an investigation is set to answer “why” and “how” questions relating to a specific setting. To ensure data completeness, three sources of information are employed: government regulations, publicly available information and interview data. It is offered that the institutionalization of an accounting technology within the public sector may be more complex, or complex in a different way, than what would occur in its “private” sector equivalent. The actors involved may have different agendas and interests in a public sector organization (Nor-Aziah and Scapens, 2007). Such actors may include policymakers, those who apply these reporting rules, and Stages of institutionalization 1. New ideals 2. New discourses 3. New techniques 4. Internalization

Focus of investigation Dissemination of new ideals which require the adoption of AAS in the Indonesian public sector Mobilization by actors leading to the passing of a legislative policy to develop a set of accrual accounting standards The formulation of a set of new accounting standards The production and use of accrual accounting information for the intended purposes highlighted in the Law 17 (2003) and GASt

Table II. Focus of this investigation

JAOC 8,3

264

users of government reports (Mignot and Dolley, 2000). Users of government reports may include managers, politicians, creditors and tax payers. In developing nations, international financial authorities such as the IMF and the ADB are also influential (Sharma and Lawrence, 2008; Rahaman, 2009). Hence any such study should incorporate the interests of these stakeholders. The interviewees at the national level were chosen to capture the view of those who have involved themselves in disseminating AAS ideals in the Indonesian public sector and those formulating the accrual-based Government Accounting Standards (GASt). These participants are or were affiliated with the Indonesian Ministry of Finance (MOF), the National Parliament, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA), the State Audit Board, and the Committee of GASt. At the local level, interviews were conducted with people in the municipality who were directly involved in preparing and (potentially) using the accrual-based reports of the municipality. Those interviewed include senior officials in the divisions of financial and asset management, planning, internal auditing, and human resources. Outside the municipality interviews were conducted with those who assisted the municipality prepare its reports including financial consultants and certified accountants. Potential users interviewed include local parliamentary members and activists of a non-government organization (Table III). Questions asked were formulated in accordance with the roles of each participant. For example, the participants at the national level were asked about the process leading to the formulation of the AAS regulations and standards. Participants from the municipality were asked to discuss the processes for which they were responsible or in which

Group of participants National level

Table III. Details of participants

Organizational position/role of participant

Two former senior officials in MOA One senior official (MOF) Four senior researcher (State Audit Agency) Three parliamentary members (national level) Three members of the Government Accounting Standard Committee One senior official in MIA Two accounting academics Local level (municipal One deputy mayor government under Three officials at the financial and asset management division study) Two officials at planning and budget division Two officials at the inspectorate division Two officials at the human resource management division Three local parliamentary members Two officials at the financial evaluation division for local governments at a provincial government in which the municipal government is part of its jurisdiction Two consultants Two certified public accountants One journalist Two activists of a non-government organization Total

Number of participants 16

20

36

they engaged. We employed a list of interview questions, however to keep the interviews flowing in a natural way, the questions were not used in a strict manner to allow participants to openly reveal relevant information as much as possible. The interview approach is in accordance with the notion that in a case study a researcher can interview people from different settings (organizations) to facilitate multiple levels of analyses (Yin, 2009). Interviewing participants from different groups of stakeholders or professions (i.e. manager of an accounting unit, preparers and users of government reports and media) has been adopted in previous public sector accounting studies (Jones and Puglisi, 1997; Van Peursem and Pratt, 1998; Mignot and Dolley, 2000; Christensen, 2002; Mack and Ryan, 2006). Interviews ran from 60 to 90 minutes. The interviews were held in the offices of participants and recorded, and later transcribed and translated. A summary of each interview was formed and reviewed with each participant as soon as possible after the interview via a separate telephone or personal contact to ensure that their views were appropriately represented. Following Yin’s (2009) recommendations, and once the collection of data was complete, comments were systematically categorized using classifications found within the IPM framework provided by Dambrin et al. (2007). Data was then coded, categorized and labelled. Results reveal patterns which indicate the emergence of ideals calling for accrual accounting information in the Indonesian public sector, the process of formulating government law and policy on AAS, the formulation of accrual-based accounting standards and that which demonstrates how and why the AAS was internalized in one Indonesian municipality. In addition, the data were tabulated into categories such as the period of time, people or organizations and the character of specific actions from specific actors. This was useful in coming to an understanding of the nuances and complexity of the situation. As the interviews were conducted in the Indonesian language, and as most of the documents used are also written in that language, translations to English were undertaken by the first author. To ensure accuracy of translations, a selection of the interviews and documents were reviewed (twice each) by two Indonesian-speaking individuals in New Zealand. The Dambrin et al. (2007) model was helpful in identifying and categorizing the data into specific themes and patterns. The interviews concluded in 2010. 5. Findings and discussion This section introduces the public sector accounting structure in Indonesia followed by a discussion of the institutionalization of the AAS in one municipality within the Indonesian public sector as informed by the IMP model. The public sector accounting system in Indonesia is comprised of reporting systems for a central and for all local governments and entities. The latter includes, for example, municipalities and publicly-owned organizations such as schools, universities, and hospitals and state-owned companies. Before the issuance of Indonesian GASt in 2005, agencies and departments at all levels used the cash based system inherited from the primarily-Dutch colonial era. Exceptions are state-owned companies which have used the private sector reporting standards (Nasution, 2008). The public sector accounting reforms referred to earlier have now required the adoption of AAS for all of these sectors. The following evaluates patterns in terms of IPM’s new ideals, new discourses, new techniques and internalization.

Accrual accounting

265

JAOC 8,3

266

5.1 New ideals Several overlapping events on the national level in Indonesia led to calls for the implementation of AAS in the Indonesian public sector. The first of these was the 1983 oil crisis. It and its effects were said to inspire MOF technocrats (senior economists and accountants) to press for public sector accounting reform that would control government spending and to reflect real performance (Prawiro, 1987; Nasution, 2008). An interviewee states: As far as I know, the rationale behind the idea [the adoption of an accrual based accounting] was to ensure the Government’s spending would be more efficient as the revenue from the oil declined (Interviewee 4).

The 1983 oil-price-driven fiscal crisis was indeed very damaging to the economy and concerns as to its impact was well-publicized. High rates of inflation and public incidents of social tension were in evidence in the late 1980s and 1990s (Hill, 1999; Papenek, 1993; Nasution, 2008). Indonesia’s Central Government was under yet more pressure following the 1997 Asian financial crisis (Boediono, 1999). Internal political divisions and threats of secession raised further warning signs for this government. According to a World Bank report: Latest events in Indonesia bear out the key message of our most recent economic report – that the country’s newfound economic stability remains highly fragile. The sudden upsurge in violence in East Timor and the disturbing implications of the Bank Bali affair have shaken market confidence. These developments have interrupted [. . .] an otherwise steady march toward economic stabilization (World Development Bank, 1999).

There were even questions as to whether Indonesia was a failed state (Wanandi, 2002). Reliance on oil revenues to cover up government expenditures or mismanagement was no longer viable. An academic interviewed shared his view of events: [During the 1980s] we simply needed a better recording system to ensure that public money was properly spent for a better result (Interviewee 2).

Macro-political events ultimately led to the fall of Suharto’s Government in 1998 and the last autocratic regime. The Indonesian bureaucracy, now freed from direct autocratic control, was more able than perhaps ever before to promote transparency. The second major influence appears to have been sourced in western practices which found advocates in Indonesia’s MOF and MIA officials. A number of public sector accounting reforms had recently occurred in Australia, New Zealand and the UK in particular (Van Peursem et al., 1996; Ryan, 1999; Lapsley and Pallot, 2000; Sharma and Lawrence, 2008; Chang, 2009) and this would have been “heard” by Indonesian technocrats. Such reforms were marked by conversions from cash-based to managerialist and accrual-based accounting systems for public sector assets and reporting. Given such economic pressures, and the existence of overseas alternatives, some elements within the Indonesian Government sought to require the adoption AAS. This is clearly indicated by a MOF 1987 initiative. As documented therein, the old cash-based accounting system inherited from the Dutch rule was seem to be insufficient to cope with a fiscal crisis or to be useful for those managing the increasing volume of economic resources now controlled by the State (Prawiro, 1987; Papanek, 1993). The growing democratization of Indonesian Government, and its growing complexity as a result, made it more difficult for cash-based budgets to be acceptable as a means of accounting for the Indonesian public sector. Prawiro (1987, p. 10) himself states:

In broader terms, the accounting and financial reporting systems as practiced in Indonesia today [. . .] [were promulgated for] measuring and reporting compliance with budget limits set by the Parliament. [. . .] the old accounting [systems] [. . .] have failed to keep pace and have become strained beyond their limits.

Such efforts to encourage AAS echoed the sort of rhetoric found in public sector accounting reforms common to the time (Guthrie, 1998; Lapsley and Pallot, 2000). Overseas practices – including AAS – thus became the new “norm” and led to what we consider to be normative institutional pressures for reform. These ideas of the “normative” draw from Deephouse’s (1996) analysis of commercial banking (Deephouse and Suchman, 2008) and Scott’s (1991) analytical framework offering pillars of institutional framing. The “normative”, referring to norms and social obligations, is often acquired in the education of influential professionals (Kury, 2007, pp. 370-372). These influences indeed did occur in Indonesia. In particular, ministry officials did not come by their views in isolation but appear to have been inspired by lessons they brought home from overseas (western) experiences and from the public sector accounting rhetoric of the time. A former senior official in the MOF points to this factor: There were only a few high officials in the Ministry of Finance who [were] concerned with that matter [but] they were mainly educated in Western countries (Interviewee 1).

So for example Budiono, the deputy governor of Bank Indonesia in 1997-1998 who was later MOF received degrees from the University of Western Australia and Monash (Australia), and a doctorate from Wharton (USA). Calls for change led by the MOF, led to other internal voices – such as those within Central Government and Parliament itself – for AAS: They [national Parliamentary members] supported the implementation of a more accountable and transparent [reporting system] in this country (Interviewee 2).

Finally, there was direct pressure for reform from external supporters such as the USA (Chomsky, 1998; Wanandi, 2002). External financial providers also set out expectations including the IMF which had a history of supporting Indonesia (Boediono, 2002), and the ADB via their Country Assistance Plan. ADB documents of the time also revealed serious concerns with the quality of Indonesian accountability (ADB, 2011a, b). This is not surprising as corrupt transfers of government funds had become such a problem in 1997 and 1998 that as much of 30 percent of World Bank funds may have been diverted for corrupt uses (Fried, 2011). Funding providers were demanding accounting system reform (Fried, 2011). Lack of transparency and accountability were thus the root causes for concern, a belief widely held by influential parties both at home and overseas. In a sense, such discourse not only indicated a competition between government and non-government actors as was suggested by Christensen and Parker (2010), but also between and among government actors themselves. Together, a new “norm” was being established as “ideal”, and this encouraged and encompassed the use of AAS in the Indonesian public sector. Prior to Suharto’s demise in 1998 however, these “normative” pillars were not successfully transformed into new ideals. Neither new discourses nor new techniques had been formed at the time.

Accrual accounting

267

JAOC 8,3

268

5.2 New discourses New discourses in the institutionalization of AAS in Indonesia began therefore with the collapse of the Suharto administration in 1998 and culminated in the issuance of laws passed between 1998 and 2006 that put into place mandates for accrual accounting. The problems and pressures that led to the fall of Suharto’s Government, and indeed which led to the introduction of selective democratic practices in Indonesia, form therefore an important part of explaining the reforms that followed. At least with respect to accounting reform, post-1998 governments and parliaments enabled new ideals to be converted into new discourses (laws primarily) and change accounting and reporting expectations. The political and economic reforms undertaken by post-Suharto administrations can be thus said to have been driven by Government’s responses to the economic crisis. It was successive presidents – B.J. Habibie (1998-1999), Abdurrahman Wahid (1999-2001) and Megawati Sukarno Putri (2001-2004) – who led from the front in political, economic and public sector reforms that neither Suharto nor previous leaders had undertaken: Following the fall of Suharto’s regime [. . .] comprehensive reforms were undertaken including the implementation of autonomy policies for local governments, the improvement of the budgetary system, the increasing role of State Audit Board, and the implementation of the accrual accounting system (Interviewee 1).

Such reforms, via statute, included the adoption of direct elections for president and local officials (governor and mayors) and also greater autonomy for local governments (Baswedan, 2007). This is significant as to be discussed later in terms of understanding a local municipality’s budgetary power. One statute issued during this period of time established the new accounting ideals into law. This was Law 17 (2003) which itself uses the language of reformers in Australia and New Zealand: that is, to “enhance accountability, transparency and efficiency” of government institutions (Law 17/2003). Law 17 specified that every government official in the country has the responsibility to ensure that public sector financial management practices are undertaken in accordance with stated principles including, again drawing on Western language, “efficiency, effectiveness, tranparency, public accountability and fairness” (Law 17, para-1). This may not appear to be out of the ordinary for readers accustomed to practices in Western societies, but this introduced new principles into Indonesian law in defining basic principles necessary for the financial management of the Indonesian public sector. Law 17 also required the adoption of AAS: [it required the] public sector to produce accrual based reports (Interviewee 4, An academic).

Law 17 was drafted by MOF bureaucrats, met no formal resistance when tabled and passed Parliamentary vote with little revision or opposition. It was thus a strong statement that led to significant changes in the types and content of government financial reports for organizations at both the national and the local government levels. Other law reforms reinforced or provided the foundation on which these changes could occur. In Laws 22 and 25 (1999) the Central Government of Indonesia grants autonomy to local administrations for financial, management and budgeting arrangements. This means that they are not only held to account at a local level, but are also responsible for reporting in the particular manner required. Law 15 (2006) was imposed to strengthen the role of the State Audit Board. This statute gave the State Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia, now an independent body, the right to perform financial, performance and special purpose audits as they see fit. Under statute, the board has the right to determine

the audit objective and plan, and empowers them with reasonably wide authority to do so. This strengthened the constitutional role and also built on the November 2001 statute (which itself required the use of professional auditors). Also, and in accordance with Law 17 concerning state finance (2003) the promulgation of GASt in 2005 was made possible and was imposed on government departments. Public sector organisations are required to adopt AAS as part of complying with these internationally-inspired accounting standards. Law 17 (2003) and similarly-inspired statutes thus represent a watermark in Indonesian statutory law, influencing public reporting systems at all levels of government. Its enactment also represents the transformation of AAS from a new ideal to the realm of new discourse. So while the need for reporting reform had been introduced as a new ideal in the 1980s, it is important to bear in mind that the issuance of Law 17 (and other relevant statutes) only occurred following on from, and in response to, the Suharto administration collapse in 1998. That is, the new discourses were not only driven by the actors in the MOF and others, but also by dramatic changes in the national political environment and from having new political actors in the highest echelons of power. Therefore, the nature and extent of this reform cannot be isolated from the influence of social and political changes. This accommodates the notion that “an understanding of accounting [. . .] change requires an understanding of various organizational and historical contingencies” (Scapens and Roberts, 1993, p. 30) as this was certainly important toward evaluating the new discourses in accounting in the Indonesian public sector. So while the powers that came to influence these statutes may have been “normative” in the sense of their having established new expectations for reporting and accounting systems, as laws they imposed a form of coercive institutionalism on the Indonesian public sector. This is discussed in the following section where the process of institutionalizing these laws into policy is revealed.

Accrual accounting

269

5.3 New techniques During the new techniques stage, the institutionalization of the AAS is characterized by the formulation and promulgation of accrual-based GASt, a process which was completed in 2005. The new reporting standards are very specific in defining the type and content of reports now required of government departments and of agencies at both the central and local levels. As with the Law 17 (2003) the GASt require government organizations to produce budget realization reports (cash-based reports), balance sheets (accrual), statements of cash flows, and notes to financial statements (Table IV). These reports must be made available at both the provincial level (consolidated reports) and each division (agencies, organisations, hospitals) of a province.

Reporting system

Types of report

Old reporting system 1945-2003 New reporting system accordance with the Law 17 (2003), GASt (2005) and MIA Decrees (2006/2007)

Budget realisation reports (cash base-reports) Budget realisation reports Balance sheet Cash flow Notes to financial statements

Table IV. Types of reports

JAOC 8,3

270

The members of the committee who formulate these standards represent the normative form of Scott’s (1991, 2001) legitimacy pillars as they were “shaped by common formal training and education and [. . .] shared networks” (Fowler, 2009, p. 173). That is, standard setting board members were chosen by the President from subsets of professional society in Indonesia including academia, the State Audit Board and the Indonesian Institute of Accountants. Also, this standard setting body is led by a member of the MOF. Essentially therefore, the policies and the daily activities of the committee are under the control of the MOF (GASt, 2005) and hence also the main body which was influential in forming the new ideals for Indonesian public sector accounting. In 2006 the MIA, which had also lobbied for AAS, issued a separate set of rules for local governments in what is termed the MIA Decree No. 13 (the Decree). The Decree was revised in 2007 and now forms guidance for programs, budgets and annual reports. As with the GASt, the Decree sets out basic principles, frameworks and procedures for planning and reporting, and these are also imposed on all Indonesian local governments. This effectively creates a second complete set of reporting requirements for local governments. That is, on issuance of the MIA Decree, local governments are now not only required to prepare their reports in accordance with GASt, they are also required to comply with this MIA ministerial Decree. As a consequence local governments are now required to produce two complete sets of reports under different standards, whereas before they only had to complete one. The new “norms” seem to have created in themselves a complexity far beyond that envisioned by those who had formed the new ideals of AAS. 5.4 Internalization stage While the municipality under study now produces accrual-based reports, we find little evidence to suggest that the institutionalization of the accrual-based accounting standards has significantly changed how actors in this municipal government employ them. A number of critical issues have been identified as leading to this situation, and these are as to a lack of participation, a low level of compliance, a low level of use and unintended consequences. 5.4.1 Lack of participation. According to the accounting officials in the municipality the new accounting system is said to be difficult to implement. An interviewee points out the root of the problem: It is mainly due to their education and professional backgrounds that differ from accounting (Interviewee 32).

Existing employees in the accounting and finance division of this municipality no longer appear to actively engage in the preparation of the municipal government reports. The preparation is now outsourced to external consultants. This is said to occur because the existing accounting employees lack accrual accounting skills. An auditor at the State Audit Board points out that this problem occurs on a large-scale: Most of local governments in this region including [this] Municipal Government still very much rely on consultants in preparing their reports (Interviewee 33).

Although the GASt requires financial statements for every division and consolidated reports for the municipality as a whole, staff who have the accounting skills necessary to create them is very limited. Of a total of 24 officials in the accounting and bookkeeping section in the municipality’s financial and asset management division, only two

were accounting graduates (Interviewee 21; State Audit Board, 2008). The lack of qualified accountants is not an unusual situation in the Indonesian public sector. Commenting on the issue, a senior auditor at the State Audit Board, who had audited this municipality, states: As far as I know, in this region it is difficult to find qualified people that can accomplish their task either at the top position or technical level. Their backgrounds have nothing to do with accounting (Interviewee 20).

A certified accountant (Interviewee 33), who was involved in assisting our municipality prepare its budgets and financial statements, agreed. Another participant who trained officials in the municipality stated that the accrual based reporting system “has not been well implemented and most of the employees in the financial and accounting division lack basic training or professional backgrounds in the field” (Interviewee 14). Furthermore, the human resource management systems within the Indonesian public sector generally, and for this municipality specifically, have not been reformed in ways that serve the new ideology. So for example, those Indonesians who are experienced and skilled professionals, such as accountants from the private sector, have been reluctant to become civil servants due to the low salary and age limits (McLeod, 2006; Setiyono and McLeod, 2010). Overall, these events have led to cost increases. While departmental cost changes are difficult to determine at this time, adding new bureaucratic layers to an existing base must result in significant cost increases. That is, while the accrual based report preparation is outsourced, existing government “accounting” employees are still paid and employed at the same level as before (Interviewee 22). This cannot be seen to fulfil the intent of those who formed the new ideals, and it supports the notion that with a lack of institutional capacity, unintended consequences can occur. That is, the outcomes and implications of the adoption of a new accounting system seem to run counter to the motives held by the policy makers who sought to implement them (Mimba et al., 2007; Nor-Aziah and Scapens, 2007; Norhayati and Siti-Nabiha, 2009). This may be a matter of having fallen back into old habits, a point which gains resonance as further internalization practices are revealed. 5.4.2 Low level of compliance. Both the GASt and the Decree issued by the MIA require Indonesian local governments to prepare reports for the local government body and for of each of their division and sub-organizations. However, our municipality was only able to provide a set of consolidated reports by 2007, four years after the original requirement was put in place. A similar situation of reports delayed or unmade apparently occur elsewhere and, at least as of 2007, some had as yet to provide any reports at all (State Audit Board, 2007, 2008). This appears to be an ongoing problem, as suggested from an interviewee at the State Audit Board: What we have audited so far are only the consolidated reports of a municipal or a provincial government, not the reports [from their divisions] (Interviewee 26).

Even as at 2010, the consolidated reports of the municipality under study have yet to fully comply with the new GASt or provide the basis on which the State Audit Board can come to an opinion on its reports. Its reports for 2006 and 2007 both received disclaimer opinions from the State Audit Board. Assurance as to the quality of information provided is not, therefore, available.

Accrual accounting

271

JAOC 8,3

272

This failure to receive a “clean” audit opinion prevents a real accounting of this local government and furthermore may provide opportunities to engage in account mismanagement. Indeed, such mismanagement appears to have occurred. In the 2006 and 2007 audits a number of irregularities were identified even as auditors acknowledged their inability to come to an “opinion” overall. The board found irregularities that indicate susceptibilities relating to cash and asset management, to the provision of supporting documents for some transactions and expenditures which were disbursed without apparent or appropriate approval documentation (State Audit Board, 2008). The low level of compliance discovered in our municipality does not appear to be unique, and may exist in most of these local governments. According to the State Audit Board (Table V) only 5 percent of local governments’ reports in 2005 were prepared in accordance with GASt to be awarded unqualified opinions. Counter to what might be expected for systems under reform, this compliance rate decreased to 1 percent in 2006 and 2007 and only slightly bettered itself to 2.7 percent in 2008. Raising another type of concern, there were 7.2 percent of local governments’ reports with adverse opinions in 2008, a worsening situation from 2005 which reported only a 3 percent rate of adverse opinion. As to the reports produced at the central level, and where such reports were prepared at all, the failure to present them in a form complying with GASt has been apparently common (Nasution, 2008). This means that both in terms of production and quality, progress on these matters has been poor. Furthermore, given the patterns over time, it does not appear to be improving; a situation also found in our municipality. Irrespective of the authority of the (new discourse) statutory law, or the clarity of new techniques and the standards it produced, it seems that the New Ideals have not as yet been effectively translated into actual practice. 5.4.3 Low level of use. Although Law 17 (2003) and the GASt and MIA standards require multiple reports in the “new” style, demand for them by users appears to be very low. One reason for this may be in the limited ability to understand or take meaning from them. Among the potential users, the State Audit Board (a national actor) may be one of the only parties with sufficient capacity (in terms of human resources and skills) to evaluate and offer opinions about their content (Nasution, 2008). So while it may be claimed that AAS serves efficiency, transparency and effectiveness “ideals”; there is no evidence which suggests they have been employed for this purpose. Managers appear rather to rely only on the old type of reports (cash and budget realized reports), not the new reports. The Vice Mayor of our municipality gives us a sense of how dire this lack of use may be: As you know, these reports can be accessed by the public after being audited by the State Audit and formally submitted to the [local] parliament. But in this office, I have never seen anyone outside the office come here and ask the reports (Interviewee 13).

Table V. Local governments’ reports by State Audit opinion (%)

Year

Unqualified (%)

Qualified (%)

Disclaimer (%)

Adverse (%)

Total (%)

2005 2006 2007 2008

5 1 1 2.7

85 70 63 74.1

7 23 17 16.0

3 6 19 7.2

100 100 100 100

Note: These audit opinions were issued to 469 local governments (Nasution, 2008)

As agreed by other interviewees who are with MOF and the State Audit Board, respectively (Interviewees 5 and 27), this lack of use reflects a pattern at both the national and local levels. In enquiring of internal managers and of the municipality’s parliamentary members, no clear evidence is found to suggest that they use these reports. In contrast, there is evidence that they have used the cash based reports. Two senior officials in the municipal government state: [. . .] we are still more familiar with the budget realization reports. We have used them for a long time (Interviewee 29). Now we are also required to produce [accrual] balance sheets and cash flows, but we only use these reports as our accountability document to the State Audit Board and the Local Parliament. [. . .] most of us [here] have been more familiarized with that information [of cash based reports] (Interviewee 14).

A local parliamentary member states: We only use the budget realization reports [case-based reports]. It is easier for them to understand (Interviewee 30).

This undermines the value of having accrual-based information for decision making. The lack of a will or means to understand, the reliance on historical cash-based accounts and the lack of technical accounting knowledge generally has led to the situation in which the Internalization of the AAS for this municipality is ineffective for managerial or policy purposes. With respect to the user situation in particular, we suggest that, again as to the internalization of AAS, the “taken-for-granted assumptions and symbolic aspects of social life” (Fowler, 2009, p. 173) as represented by the old cash-based reports continue to dominate. This would seem to comprise a cultural-cognitive/mimetic pillar in the institutionalization of AAS within a municipality of Indonesia. 5.4.4 The emergence of unintended outcomes. Along with the critical problems identified above, internalization of AAS systems and standards has had at least one other unintended consequence: the emergence of a bribe-kickback scheme as part of the process of account and report construction. This information comes directly from interviewees including several of the private consultants who assisted our municipality. Such practices occur during the tendering process when accounting is outsourced to external consultants: The municipal government [under study] spends a lot of money to pay accounting professionals outside the government to prepare these reports. But the situation is worsened by the fact [as the process to outsource the accounting function [would involve] tendering processes which in many cases are vulnerable to bribery and corruption (INT-34).

What occurs is that those who bid for municipal projects tend to be informally called upon to make private cash payments to local authority individuals who have the right to determine the outcome. Such practices exist elsewhere in Indonesian bureaucracy (discussed below) but have found a new outlet in financial report preparation. It is not due to declines in civil service wages, which actually increased in 1999 (World Bank, 1999, p. 2). It appears to an opportunistic event. Because the officials and their employees once prepared the reports themselves, there was no opportunity in the past for “kickbacks” from externals; now however, there is. There is a certain irony in the emergence of such a scheme

Accrual accounting

273

JAOC 8,3

274

from an accounting practice which is idealised as one formed to increase transparency. The decoupling of new ideals from internalization is apparent in this practice. It is difficult to know the extent to which such bribery occurs, though reports of “mismanagement” may give some indication of where such problems lie. So for example and with respect to reporting contracts, the State Audit Board disclosed the presence of similar schemes in their 2007 report. It was also there reported that Rp (rupiah) 383,599,998 (approximately US $38,360) of the municipal government budget in 2006 allocated for the annual costs of the housekeeping of the Mayor were not used, recorded, administered or reported in accordance with relevant rules. Such a finding was but one of multiple irregularities found in 2006 and problems discovered came to a total of 2,439,810, 266 rupiah (approximately US $ 248,931) (State Audit Board, 2007). Together, this indicates either poor financial management practices, unauthorised use of funds, or both. Bribery and kickbacks have been part of tendering processes of government projects in this municipality in the past (State Audit Board, 2008) and in Indonesian public sector organizations generally (KPPOD, 2005; Kuncoro, 2004; World Bank, 2008; Transparency International, 2010). Transparency International (2010) still ranks Indonesia as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Its presence within the report preparation process is not out of line with local practice therefore, but does appear to be new to the financial report preparation process, “in this municipality”. So although political and economic reforms have been undertaken since Suharto left office in 1998, including the adoption of AAS for central and local governments, their internalization has yet to fulfil the hopes of its conceivers. The presence of AAS and accrual-based reports have not focussed the attention or actions of people on “efficiency” or “effectiveness” as the reports are rarely used. “Transparency” does not also appear to be improved given the quality and number of reports that have been produced so far. Furthermore, internalization has, in this case, produced at least one serious unintended consequence: illegal kickback practices. Interested parties, in particular those within the MOF and the MIA internally and the World Bank, ADB externally, would have to be disappointed that the new ideals expressed in the 1980s and the new discourses fought for in laws enacted from 1999 to 2005 (in particular Law 17 (2003)) have not found realisation in practice. Siti-Nabiha and Scapens (2005) refer to the possibility that new systems may be resisted if they challenge “prevailing” institutions. In this vein, the existing attitudes and the behaviours of local actors of the municipal government studied have made real Internalization impossible. Table VI summarizes the evidence in accordance with the IPM model adapted from Dambrin et al. (2007). 6. Theoretical implications Drawing from these findings, we present four theoretical implications of the study. First, as the price of oil dropped in 1983, the technocrats in the MOF lobbied for alternative ways to report and measure government revenues and spending. The presence of a fiscal crisis and the internal and external pressure brought to bear on Indonesia to follow accepted accounting practices of the time facilitated the mobilization of these new ideals. Similar to that discovered by Maguire et al. (2004) in their Canadian study, the technocrats in the Indonesian MOF played a leading role as agents of change in these institutional arrangements and transformed existing understandings through their lobbying,

Stages of institutionalization 1. New ideals (1993-1998)

Main evidence identified

The economic motive was behind the ideal to adopt AAS Technocrats at MOF were the main promoters of the aspiration to adopt accrual accounting Suharto’s tight political control blocked a further effort to reform to change the law on state finance and reporting system 2. New discourses The collapse of the Suharto (1998-2003) administration in 1998 was the main impetus of public sector accounting reforms as part of wider reforms in economic and political system A new law issued (law 17 on state finance) which required the adoption of an accrual reporting system issued in 2003 MOF was the main actor endorsing the Law 17 (2003) 3. New techniques MOF and MOF issued their reporting (2003-2007) rules for local governments GASt issued by a committee back by MOF and MIA issued MIA Decree No. 13 issued in 2006 4. Internali-zation (in The lack of participation from existing municipal government) employees and accounting costs (after 2006) increase Low level of compliances reports to rules Low level of demand on government reports from potential users Underuse of accrual based reports for managerial purposes The emerging of an illegal practice

Domain of institutionalization process Evidence found in this study IPM model National (outside organization)

National level

National (outside organization)

Local (organizational level)

National (outside organization)

Local (organizational level)

Accrual accounting

275

Local Local (organizational (organizational level) level)

government regulation (laws and decrees) and standard-setting process of public sector accounting practices in the country. Ja¨rvenpa¨a¨ (2009) points out that while distinctions are evoked at different points in the institutionalization process, pillars of institutionalization can and “do” occur through their own distinctive mechanisms and processes. That is, pillars of legitimation can emerge at different stages of the process, something that seems to have occurred here. Normative influences are apparent in the calls for AAS in the 1980s and during the formation of new ideals through the efforts and involvement of the MOF, the State Audit Board, Parliament and the MIA.

Table VI. Issues identified based on the IPM model of Dembrin et al. (2007)

JAOC 8,3

276

Second, the fall of Suharto’s government in 1998 was an event that allowed these new accounting ideals to be realised in the form of real public (new) discourses. Such reforms as were made from 1998 to 2005 cannot be understood independently of the domestic upheavals and international pressures of which they were a part. There were also open and public demands for a more accountable bureaucracy and a transparent government. While pressures for change existed prior to Suharto’s fall, the Indonesian Government did not (or could not) react to them until regime change forced a form of democracy onto the nation as a whole. The idea that different organizations react differently to cognitive-cultural pressures finds support here, as AAS reform was also dependent on Indonesian Government reform. That is, and during Suharto’s Government, neither the oil crisis of 1983, the Asian crisis of 1997, the aspirations of MOF technocrats, nor encouragement from overseas players were, alone, effective in creating reporting practice change. Yet when this firmly-established order was replaced with new regimes after 1998, those behind public sector accounting reforms could mobilize as part of these wider political and economic reforms and convert the new ideals into new discourses and new techniques. Without support from the top echelons of power following the fall of Suharto’s regime in 1998, it does not seem probable that change could have occurred beyond Dambrin et al.’s (2007) conception of new ideals. Yet even at that point, the transition to new discourses was not smooth. Regulatory/coercive pillars were apparent in the construction of laws and standards now imposed on municipalities such as the one under study. The established and traditional roles of the MOH and the MIA as coordination ministries for local administrations led to the creation of duplicate reporting regimes. Why this occurred is not entirely clear, although there may be a competitive element between the two ministries not fully acknowledged by these interviewees. Irrespective, the existence of two separate sets of standards has made the implementation of the AAS unreasonably complex, particularly for these preparers and these users (Interviewees 10 and 26; State Audit Board, 2008); and probably more complicated than was necessary to meet the intent of these new ideals. As has been found or theorised elsewhere (Hassan, 2005), interests and the powers of regulating agencies have shaped how these accounting rules were formulated. As the standards and requirements of these agencies and institutions are subsequently internalized, another pattern emerges. This is our third point and relates to the application to practice of what appears to be cultural norms of Indonesian society. In particular, the ongoing “use” of cash-based reports by managers, and their failure to prevent (and perhaps to be complicit in) a kickback scheme in outsourcing their preparation draws from traditions and a culture present long before AAS had emerged onto the public agenda. A related influence is that the technical capacity and resource dependence of actors who internalized this accounting system seems to have determined the extent to which it was ultimately realised. As we find, the internalization of an AAS by the actors in this municipality is far from complete; and there is nothing to suggest that this is unusual within the Indonesian public sector. In other words there is a decoupling phenomenon between the intended outcome of new ideals, discourses and techniques and their Internalization into report preparation and use. This is indicated by these two primary sources of evidence: (1) that the existing employees in this municipal government lack the accrual accounting skills to prepare such reports, leading to new (and kickback-enhancing) costs to achieve the result; and

(2) that the potential users of these accrual-based reports lack the expertise, knowledge and interest to effectively use the information for the managerial decisions it was intended.

Accrual accounting

Nevertheless, although existing employees and bureaucrats lack such skills and understandings, the municipal government is starting to produce these reports, albeit at a very slow pace. There is a coercive element here however. These municipalities rely on Central Government for a significant portion of their finance. In 2006 financial support from the Central Government to municipalities accounted for more than 90 percent of our municipality’s annual budget (State Audit Board, 2007). The Vice Mayor stresses:

277

It is the obligation of the local government [local bureaucracy] to implement all regulations imposed to them by the central government (Interviewee 14).

So there is a strong incentive to produce them. As we have seen however, the form they have taken has turned out to be both incomplete and, in great part, of an unacceptable quality. Therefore, and from an institutional perspective, this local government in Indonesia may be adopting accrual accounting under duress, and a coercive isomorphism appears to be taking place (Baker and Rennie, 2006, p. 87). It is in the interest of this municipal government to conform to the rules imposed by Central Government. This inevitability also explains why the institutionalization of AAS in this municipality has been dominated by actors at the central level; in particular, national presidents after 1998 and leaders in the Central Government MIA and Finance. The dominant role of the MOF emerged even before Suharto’s fall. That is, the new ideals were, in this case, formed at a point before the time in which those ideals could reasonably be converted into the new discourse and new techniques. Furthermore, and until the government itself fell and became newly democratized, such new ideals found only fallow ground in which to grow. Yet, even radical change at the top, when it did occur, did not cause new ideals to be fully institutionalized as intended, in particular during the internalization process. The State Audit Board is found to be the only apparent user of local governments’ accrual-based reports. Managers do not use them, nor do other senior officials. Nor do they or their employees even prepare them any longer, leaving that task to contracted external consultants. The new standards for reporting have therefore added yet another layer of bureaucracy to this municipality and opened it up to other means by which quiet illegalities in the form of “kickbacks” can be allowed to occur. Finally, some “seeking legitimacy” patterns may also be revealed insofar as new discourses (through law) and the new techniques (via new standards) mirror overseas language and practices. While there may or may not have been a desire to achieve homogeneity with other jurisdictions, this influence is difficult to know. What we do know however is that the primary agents of change (MOF and MIA bureaucrats) returned from their overseas’ experiences with new ideals consistent with such views at the time. In an era where there was little competition for Western powers on the global accounting stage, it is perhaps not surprising that it was their principles and their standards that were brought to bear on this administration. The relationship between actors and stages is shown in Figure 2. We wonder what could have been done to have modified the effect of such distorting influences. Perhaps if this municipality had provided resources to train existing employees in accounting, there would have been no need to outsource the preparation of

JAOC 8,3

Fiscal stress (1983)

International trend

New ideals

278 National actors: • MOF • MIA • State Audit Board

• Economic and political shocks (financial and political crisis in 1997 and 1998) • Domestic & international pressures for better accountability & democratic government

New discourses Political system & behaviour of powerful actors

Interest & power

New techniques

Local actors: • Senior officials • Local consultants

As Idealised

Figure 2. The pattern of the institutionalization of AAS in the Indonesian public sector

Internalization (in one municipality) Improve ‘efficiency’ & ‘transparency’

‘Use’ not made, ‘kickbacks’

Technical capacity & resource dependence

Power, old habits and social context & local actors

Note: = Influence from outside Indonesian public sector = Influence from inside Indonesian public sector = Flow of institutionalization process

its reports. Budgetary constraints could not reasonably form an excuse for not training up its own staff; after all, there were resources for contracting consultants. In thinking about this, it may be important to recall that kickbacks also emerged from this internalization process, and it may not have been in management’s interest to train their own staff. Irrespective, this does suggest to us the power of local actors and personal incentives to divert the intent of government policy. As Hopper and Major (2007, p. 66) discovered “[. . .] criteria for allocating material and human resources are linked to domination [by powerful actors at organizational level]”. In this case, these new ideals were effectively defeated at the level of these local managers and bureaucrats. In any case, our findings demonstrate how calls for greater financial efficiency through accounting system reform did not, in this case, translate to effective accounting practice. This appears to primarily be because new ideals, new discourses and new techniques were not internalized. The nature of the political system and the behaviour of powerful actors within this municipality are powerful reasons that institutionalization failed to occur.

7. Conclusion and contribution The purpose of the study is to examine the institutionalization of the AAS in one municipality within the Indonesian public sector by answering two research questions: how and why the AAS has been adopted and how it has been implemented in one municipal government. Through a case study, this investigation collected the data from document sources and interviews. Drawing from the institutionalization model of Dambrin et al. (2007) there are found to be two primary conclusions of the study. First, the ideals promoting the use of accrual-based reporting system launched by the technocrats at the MOA in the early 1980s responded to the fiscal crisis. However, the formal adoption of the AASs could not occur until regime change occurred at the very top of Indonesian Government. Accounting events in Indonesia’s public sector cannot be isolated therefore from the broader economic and political reforms undertaken by post-Suharto regimes. Changes at the national level opened up the opportunity for technocrats in the MOF and others to transform the new ideals into accrual accounting standards and rules. Such a development indicates that both economic and political factors shaped policy formulation related to new accounting rules in the public sector. As such, the findings of this study support the need, expressed by Dillard et al. (2004), Nor-Aziah and Scapens (2007), Hopper and Major (2007) and Monteiro and Aibar-Guzman (2010) who offer that institutional theory would do well to incorporate notions of politics and power so as to better capture the macro-complexity of the processes and dynamics which lead to change. Second, technical capacity, power and the old habits and social history of actors in this organization were important in determining the extent to which AAS was internalized. In this case and despite Indonesian Government efforts to reform public sector accounting as a part of greater political and economic changes, the process by which that institutionalization occurred is far more complex and its road less straightforward than its idealists may have envisioned. In the end, that achieved contradicts in several respects the intended benefits of this change. There is a gap between the idealised purpose of nurturing efficiency and transparency and that which is now revealed. The findings remind us that the processes of institutionalization of a new accounting system is determined by a multitude of factors, including those which are external (Burns and Scapens, 2000) and “the organization activities, processes and routines that may or may not accepted as institutions” (Hassan, 2005, p. 126). Drawing on the IPM model of Dambrin et al. (2007) the study contributes to an improved understanding of a system which has been destabilised by regime-changing political-economic events. In this case, what occurred not only a change in “government”, but also change in the nature of that government. While a study about policy formulation and internalization of accounting systems in a public sector context, it is also as to change on a broad nation-based political spectrum. This study contributes therefore to existing research about the roles of actors within their social and institutional contexts surrounding the institutionalization of an accounting system within a context that has been rarely explored. The lessons learned here could usefully be taken into account by policy makers in informing how a process of institutionalization can be complex and its outcomes diverted. Beyond this, the study fills a gap in research-based knowledge about public sector accounting practices in developing and emerging economies generally.

Accrual accounting

279

JAOC 8,3

280

8. Limitations and recommendations for future studies The findings of the study are not free from limitation. First, as one of the sources of the data was drawn from one municipal government the results of the study cannot be taken to represent a general pattern attributable to other local governments in Indonesia or elsewhere. Second, given the qualitative and complex nature of the study, it is possible the interpretation offered here may not be the only one. Nonetheless, the methods employed are such that the analysis derives from the views and documents relevant to the situation. Furthermore, the project contributes to research generally in that the findings can be used to explore, and tested against, other public management practices in Indonesia such as that having to do with public sector audit, performance measurement, and output based budget systems. Dambrin et al.’s (2007) IPM model used in the study also has the potential to illuminate the details of institutionalization processes within other organizations, and it is shown how it can be used to reveal the interaction between institutions and actors at a local, national and national level. Moreover, it is revealed how the model can be used both to identify the actors involved in an institutionalization process and to explain the behaviours of actors. From a historical perspective, this study helps map an important period of accounting and political change in Indonesia. A future study could duplicate the approach to undertake a comparison among local administrations in Indonesia, or to compare it with situations in other contexts and in other political environments. Moreover, as accounting is not merely a technical device, future studies should also consider the nature and the social and institutional features of accounting as a tool for mobilizing powers and control on people or organizations. In this case, social, economic, political, and institutional aspects of accounting provide interesting grounds for future studies. References ADB (2001), “Indonesia: 2001-2003”, Asian Development Bank, available at: www.adb.org/ documents/caps/ino/default.asp (accessed 28 June 2011). ADB (2011a), “Audit board Indonesia”, paper produced by the Professional Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions as Part of the United Nations Task Force, available at: www. intosaiiaudit.org/mandates/writeups/indonesia.htm (accessed 29 June). ADB (2011b), The Jakarta Post, Asian Development Bank. Alam, M. (1997), “Budgetary process in uncertain context: a study of state-owned enterprises in Bangladesh”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 147-67. Andon, P., Baxter, J. and Chua, W.F. (2007), “Accounting change as relational drifting: a field study of experiments with performance measurement”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 273-308. Baker, R. and Rennie, M.D. (2006), “Forces leading to the adoption of accrual accounting by the Canadian government: an institutional perspective”, Canadian Accounting Perspectives, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 83-112. Bale, M. and Dale, T. (1998), “Public sector reform in New Zealand and its relevance to developing countries”, World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 103-21. Baswedan, A. (2007), “Indonesia politics in 2007: the presidency, local elections and the future of democracy”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economics Studies, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 323-40. Boediono (1999), “Addressing the social impacts”, Speech Delivered to The Meeting on Development Cooperation: Responding to the Asian Crisis, Sydney, 5 March.

Boediono (2002), “The IMF support program in Indonesia: comparing its implementation under three presidents”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 38 No. 3. Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2005), “Organisational and accounting change: theoretical and empirical reflections and thoughts on a future research agenda”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 7-26. Burns, J. and Scapens, R. (2000), “Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3-25. Carlin, T.M. (2005), “Debating the impact of accrual accounting and reporting in the public sector”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 309-36. Chang, L. (2009), “The impact of political interest upon the formulation of performance measurements: the NHS star rating system”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 145-65. Chomsky, N. (1998), “Indonesia, master card in Washington’s hand”, Indonesia, Vol. 66, pp. 1-5. Chow, D., Humphrey, C. and Moll, J. (2007), “New development: in pursuit of WGA – research findings from the UK”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 27-54. Christensen, M. (2002), “Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales government”, Accounting History, Vol. 7, pp. 93-124. Christensen, M. (2007), “What we might know (but aren’t sure) about public sector accrual accounting”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 51-65. Christensen, M. and Parker, L. (2010), “Using ideas to advance professions: public sector accrual accounting”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 246-66. Christiaens, J. and Rommel, J. (2008), “Accrual accounting reforms: only for businesslike (part of) government”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 309-36. Connolly, C. and Hyndman, N. (2006), “The actual implementation of accruals accounting: caveats from a case within the UK public sector”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 272-90. Covaleski, M.A., Dirsmith, M.W. and Michelman, J.E. (1993), “An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18, pp. 65-80. Dambrin, C., Lambert, C. and Sponem, S. (2007), “Control and change – analysis of the process and institutionalization”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 172-208. Deephouse, D.L. and Suchman, M. (2008), “Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism”, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlen, K. and Suddaby, R. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage, London, pp. 49-77. Dillard, J.F., Rigsby, J.T. and Goodman, C. (2004), “The making and remaking of organization context: duality and the institutionalization process”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 506-42. DiMaggio, P.J. (1987), “Interest and agency in institutional theory”, in Zucker, L.G. (Ed.), Institutional Patterns in Organizations, Culture and Environment, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3-21. Durocher, S. and Fortin, A. (2010), “Standard-setting institutions’ user-oriented legitimacy management strategies”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 476-504. Fitrani, F., Hofman, B. and Kaiser, K. (2005), “Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralizing Indonesia”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 57-97.

Accrual accounting

281

JAOC 8,3

282

Fowler, C. (2009), “Performance management, budgeting, and legitimacy-based change in educational organisations”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 168-96. Fried, S. (2011), The World Bank: Corruption in Indonesia, Timeline 1997-1998, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY, available at: www.edf.org/article.efm?/contentID-1579 (accessed 29 June). Guthrie, J. (1998), “Application of accrual accounting in Australian public sector: rhetoric or reality?”, Financial Accounting and Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-19. Harun, H. (2007), “Obstacles to Indonesian public sector accounting reforms”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economics Studies, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 365-75. Hassan, M.K. (2005), “Management accounting and organizational change: an institutional perspective”, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 125-40. Hasselbladh, H. and Kallinikos, J. (2000), “The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of neo-Institutionalism in organization studies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 697-720. Hill, H. (1999), The Indonesian Economyu in Crisis: Causes, Consequences and Lessons, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. Hopper, T. and Major, M. (2007), “Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: regulation and activity-based costing in Portuguese telecommunications”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 59-97. Ja¨rvenpa¨a¨, M. (2009), “The institutional pillars of management accounting function”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 444-58. Jones, S. and Puglisi, N. (1997), “The relevance of AAS 29 to Australian public sector: a case for doubt”, Abacus, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 1-18. KPPOD (2005), Regional Investment Attractiveness 2004: A Survey of 214 Districts/Municipalities in Indonesia (Daya tarik investasi kabupaten/kota di Indonesia Tahun 2004), Komite Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah (Regional Autonomy Watch), Jakarta. Kuncoro, A. (2004), “Bribery in Indonesia: some evidence from micro-level data”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 329-54. Kury, K.W. (2007), “Decoupled earnings: an institutional perspective of the consequences of maximizing shareholder value”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 31, pp. 370-83. Lapsley, I. and Pallot, J. (2000), “Accounting, management and organizational change: a comparative study of local government”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 213-22. McLeod, H.M. (2006), “Private sector lessons for public sector reform in Indonesia”, Agenda, Vol. 13, pp. 275-88. Mack, J. and Ryan, C. (2006), “Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general-purpose financial reports of Australian government departments”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 592-612. Maguire, S., Hardy, C. and Lawrence, T.B. (2004), “Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, pp. 657-79. Marwata, M.A. (2006), “The interaction amongst reform drivers in governmental accounting changes: the case of Indonesian local government”, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 144-63.

Mignot, H. and Dolley, C. (2000), “Are AAS financial statements useful?”, Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 51-61. Mimba, N.S.H., Van Helden, G.J. and Tillema, S. (2007), “Public sector performance measurement in developing countries”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 192-208. Monteiro, S.M. and Aibar-Guzman, B. (2010), “Organizational and accounting change within the context of the environmental agenda: evidence from Portugal”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 404-35. Nasution, A. (2008), Perbaikan keuangan Negara dan daerah (Reforming the State and Local Government Financial Management), State Audit Board, Jakarta. Nor-Aziah, A.K. and Scapens, R.W. (2007), “Corporation and accounting change: the role of accounting and accountants in a Malaysian public utility”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 209-47. Norhayati, M.A. and Siti-Nabiha, A.K. (2009), “A case study of the performance management system in a Malaysian government linked company”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 243-76. Othman, R., Che Senik, Z., Ahmad Domil, A.K., Abdullah, N. and Hamzah, N. (2006), “A case study of balanced scorecard implementation in a Malaysian company”, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 55-72. Papanek, G.F. (1993), “The oil boom and after: Indonesian economic policy and performance in the Suharto Era (a review article)”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 129-40. Prawiro, R. (1987), “Reforming financial management in government: the Indonesian agenda”, International Journal of Government Auditing, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 9-17. Prodjoharjono, S. (1999), “Accrual accounting in Indonesian local government”, unpublished PhD thesis, Birmingham University, Birmingham. Rahaman, A. (2009), “Independent financial auditing and the crusade against government sector financial mismanagement in Ghana”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 224-46. Ribeiro, J.A. and Scapens, R.W. (2006), “Institutional theories in management accounting changes: contributions, issues and path for development”, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 94-111. Ryan, C. (1999), “Australian public sector financial reporting: a case of cooperative policy formulation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 561-82. Saleh, Z. and Pendlebury, M.W. (2006), “Accruals accounting in government developments in Malaysia”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 421-35. Scapens, R.W. and Roberts, J. (1993), “Accounting and control: a case study of resistance to accounting change”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-32. Scott, W.R. (1991), “Unpacking institutional arguments”, in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 164-82. Scott, W.R. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Setiyono, B. and McLeod, M.H. (2010), “Civil society organisations’ contribution to the anti-corruption movement in Indonesia”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 347-70.

Accrual accounting

283

JAOC 8,3

284

Sharma, U. and Lawrence, S. (2005), “Public sector reform, global trends vs local needs: the case of a state rental organization in Fiji”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 141-64. Sharma, U. and Lawrence, S. (2008), “Stability and change at FPTL: an institutional perspective”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 25-34. Siti-Nabiha, A.K. and Scapens, R.W. (2005), “Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 44-73. State Audit Board (Badan Pameriksa Keuangan) (2007), Audit Reports on Palu Municipal Government (Laporan Audit atas Kota), State Audit Board, Jakarta. State Audit Board (Badan Pameriksa Keuangan) (2008), Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun Anggaran 2008 (Summary of Audit Reports for the First Semester of 2008), State Audit Board, Jakarta. Ter Bogt, H.J. and Van Helden, G.J. (2000), “Accounting change in Dutch government: exploring the gap between expectations and realizations”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 263-79. Transparency International (2010), “Corruption index”, available at: www.transparency.org/ policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi_2009_table (accessed 5 December). Vamosi, T. (2000), “Continuity and change: management accounting during processes of transition”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 27-63. Van Peursem, K.A. (2009), “Conceptual framework for PBE reporting: a meaningful basis for ‘sector neutrality’”, Financial Reporting, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-30. Van Peursem, K.A. and Pratt, M.J. (1998), “Are private sector standards enough? An example from hospitals in New Zealand”, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22, pp. 123-40. Van Peursem, K.A., Pratt, M.J. and Tower, G. (1996), “Reporting for the New Zealand health sector: a history of public or private interest?”, Accounting, Business & Financial History, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 183-201. Wanandi, Y. (2002), “Indonesia: a failed state?”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 135-46. World Bank (1999), “Indonesia: macroeconomic update – current developments, policy implementation and assessment”, Indonesia: From Crisis to Opportunity, World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank (2008), “The World Bank supports the revitalization of budget system in Indonesia”, available at: http://go.worldbank.org/H2DOTH5780 (accessed 21 October 2010). Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. Further reading DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Journal Review, Vol. 48, pp. 147-60. Hopwood, A.G. (2000), “Understanding financial accounting practice”, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 25, pp. 763-6. Lu¨der, K.G. (1992), “A contingency model of governmental accounting innovations in the political-administrative environment”, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, Vol. 7, pp. 99-127. State Audit Board (Badan Pameriksa Keuangan) (2009), available at: www.bpk.go.id/doc/ hapsem/2008i/disk1/Pdf_IHPS/IHPS_I_TA_2008.pdf (accessed 18 February).

Indonesian statutes and government policy documents used Law 22 (1999), About local government. Law 25 about financial arrangement between the central and local governments. Law 17 (2003), About state finances. Law 15 (2006), On the State Audit Board. Ministry of Internal Affairs Decree (MIA) No. 13 (2006), On financial management for local government. Ministry of Internal Affairs Decree (MIA) No. 59 (2007), On the revision of financial management for local governments. GASt (2005), standar akuntansi pemerintah (Government Accounting Standards), Depkeu, Jakarta.

About the authors Harun Harun is a Lecturer in Accounting at Tadulako University, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia and a PhD Student in accounting at Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Harun Harun is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: [email protected] Karen Van Peursem is a Professor in Accounting and Auditing at the School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Ian Eggleton is a Professor in Management, Public Sector and Behavioural Accounting and he is also the Head of the School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected] Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

Accrual accounting

285