Integrating Supply and Demand SUMMER 2015
At many companies, sales generation activities have become disconnected from the operational activities required to fulfill that demand — resulting in conflicting objectives and foregone business opportunities. Bringing the supply and demand sides of an enterprise together can represent a significant opportunity for efficiency and value creation.
Wendy L. Tate Diane Mollenkopf Theodore Stank Andrea Lago da Silva
Vol. 56, No. 4
Reprint #56403
http://mitsmr.com/1SkY5QL
INTELLIGENCE
[OPERATIONS ]
Integrating Supply and Demand At many companies, sales generation activities have become disconnected from the operational activities required to fulfill that demand — resulting in conflicting objectives and foregone business opportunities. Bringing the supply and demand sides of an enterprise together can represent a significant opportunity for efficiency and value creation. BY WENDY L. TATE, DIANE MOLLENKOPF, THEODORE STANK AND ANDREA LAGO DA SILVA
Many companies compete in multiple product or customer categories, each of which requires a distinct supply chain capability. Such companies are challenged to develop capabilities in both cost leadership and product or service differentiation — a tall order, given that the ability to compete in different strategic segments at the same time requires precise coordination of the sales side of the company with supply chain operations. This is especially tricky given the fact that in many organizations, the two sides are completely disconnected, a perennial problem that management thinker Peter Drucker considered one of the “great divides” in management. The divide between demand and supply is a key reason that companies are so often trapped into selling excess products well below market rates or losing sales because an inventory shortage makes it impossible to fulfill demand. As remarkable as it might seem in this age of big data and justin-time delivery, our research suggests that the divide between demand and supply is as serious a problem today as it was in Drucker’s time. Despite all of our technological and managerial advances, most companies are still trying to play off of three different sheets of music — the financial plan, the marketing plan and the operations plan — with results that seldom end in three-part harmony. Our research suggests that most companies still do not know how to serve their most important customers in a way that maximizes the value to their customers and to themselves. To understand more about how a few companies have managed to bridge this divide, we conducted interviews with managers and senior executives at eight different organizations who worked at different roles on either side of the gap between sales and production. We found that value requirements often vary significantly across customers or segments of choice, demanding cost efficiency in some cases and product and service differentiation in others. Unlike sales, which has learned to tailor its offerings to the customer, the operational side of the enterprise is often incapable of altering its service proposition. The upshot is that a company may have an excellent sales and marketing team and a top-flight operations team and still deliver the wrong benefits to a 16 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMER 2015
customer — cost efficiency to customers who want high levels of service, or service to customers who want a very basic product. Or a company may simply overlook opportunities with those customers who could make the most difference to the business.
Toward Demand and Supply Integration Traditional attempts at coordinating demand and supply have generally focused on functional levels of the organization. The lower levels of the organization have been left to go through the motions of integration without the appropriate mindset, knowledge, motivation, incentives or structure to actually execute the plan. Our research suggests that companies that develop demand and supply integration have done far more than merely implement a single initiative. The successful ones tend to pass through five stages, each of which demands patience and perseverance: Stage 1. Develop a relevant value focus. Senior leaders must cultivate a focus on creating value for the organization and for
To compete in different strategic segments at the same time, companies need close coordination between the sales side of the company and supply chain operations.
SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU
customers. Achieving this typically requires developing crossresource allocation allows the company to make better trade-off functional structures and installing dashboard metrics that keep decisions. For example, an initiative that might not make sense the business focused on implementing demand and supply from a purely functional perspective, such as the introduction of a integration. new product to a particular grocery chain, may be approved by the Stage 2. Share knowledge across the organization. Managers team anyway, once it is understood to be part of the company’s must work on building inter-functional collaboration within the strategic growth initiative with that customer. company, building external collaboration with supply chain partBetter planning is also allowing the company to improve its exners and adopting technology that facilitates collaboration. ecution. More comprehensive information about key customer Stage 3. Allocate resources strategically. Once the entire orprofitability enables managers to make short-term decisions to ganization shares the same set of facts, the company can then flex their operational capacity in a way that maximizes their marbegin to make more thoughtful analysis of where and where not gins. The joint business-planning process focuses on a 12- to to allocate resources based on which customers deserve priority. 24-month time horizon, enhancing day-to-day execution capabilExecutives in sales and marketing can ities and reducing the need for the meet with the operations executives to reactive decision making that domimake decisions about how to create and nated previous operations. Without an understanding fulfill demand for customers of choice. A key factor facilitating this dialogue of which customers matStage 4. Learn to walk the talk. Execis a balanced scorecard methodology. ter most, every decision utives at this stage make individuals A scorecard is a helpful method for within a company accountable not just for their own unit’s translating an organization’s strategy becomes a territorial performance but for the overall perforinto specific, quantifiable operational battle across the demand mance of the organization. They goals and metrics that span demand and empower them to make decisions that supply activities in a way that ultimately and supply divide. maximize overall value and develop new improves financial performance. Maneducation and training systems that enagers say it has become such a regular courage collaboration. Finally, they develop new incentive systems part of their conversation that it now drives behavior at all levels that encourage employees to stay focused on how to provide susof the organization and sparks far more cross-functional diatainable value to high-priority customers. logue. As one manager told us, “We are living the balanced Stage 5. Balance capacity and demand. All of the work in scorecard every day now.” Executives at Company A say the evolustages 1 through 4 is just a prerequisite to the final goal: To make tion is not yet complete, but given that the company’s financial sure that the company’s most important customers’ needs can be results are now improving, it seems likely that the momentum tosatisfied profitably. This typically requires streamlining processes ward even deeper integration will continue. and then developing flexibility and fluid scheduling to meet variCompany B: High-Tech Consumer Goods Historically, Comable demand. pany B chased market share to the exclusion of other goals and Two Fortune 500 companies, now well on their way toward paid for that quest with high levels of obsolete inventory. A culdeveloping demand and supply integration, offer good examples tural change brought about by senior leaders has helped the of how this process works in practice. company develop a more balanced approach. Company A: Food Manufacturer Company A recently began to Past forecast errors led to distrust between the demand and conduct joint business planning with its top customers. Managers supply sides of the organization. Now, managers are working hard now focus on balancing supply chain capacity with the demand to develop a shared interpretation of knowledge across the organibeing created. This change, generated by the highest leadership, is zation, based on one master sales plan and one production plan. a significant cultural shift for the entire organization. The new The supply side also had bad relationships with its suppliers, rejoint business-planning processes are changing the way managers flecting an earlier focus on price concessions that were needed to think about prioritizing and allocating resources. Both marketing/ offset the cost of unsold inventory. To be fair, the company’s cost sales and operations/supply chain teams are involved in planning focus, exacerbated by the fast-paced nature of change in the indusand subsequent resource allocation. They prioritize resources try, makes it challenging to build truly open, collaborative supplier around key customers and jointly determine opportunities, balrelationships. However, the company is striving to make progress (Continued on page 18) ancing them with capacity constraints. This holistic approach to in this area and has a good SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU
SUMMER 2015 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 17
INTELLIGENCE
Integrating Supply and Demand (Continued from page 17)
supplier-relationship model in place with its third-party logistics providers, who have been asked to teach the supply chain organization better ways to manage knowledge across the supply chain network. As one senior manager at Company B told us, the organization has evolved from a “make what we can sell” approach to “how best to serve each customer.” Trade-offs are addressed by taking a holistic approach to understanding total costs relative to revenue potential. Both demand-side and supply-side managers are routinely involved in these conversations. Sales teams own the customer management processes but are also held accountable for customer profitability, which helps facilitate financial resource decisions. On the operations side, a cross-organizational focus has eliminated an earlier tendency to nurture pet projects rather than focus on customer value. The company’s operations are now becoming much more nimble. Executives say that changes to the company’s supply base, logistics operations and network design allow them to have more flexible operations and mobilize quickly as market opportunities emerge. Capitalizing on market opportunities, however, is based on an overall focus on serving their customers of choice. Flexibility doesn’t always mean “fast” to this company; rather, it means making appropriate decisions for each customer so that day-today decisions are made with an eye toward capacity availability relative to key customer requirements. Not surprisingly, daily execution is now much smoother than it used to be.
Key Insights for Managers Demand and supply integration is not a functional-level process or even a process that exclusively focuses on integration between functional processes. It’s an organization-wide orientation that spans functional domains and company politics to provide a basis on which to effectively and efficiently run an entire business enterprise. Building that capability takes time and effort. Leaders need to create the right organizational climate for demand and supply integration and establish goals and metrics that align functions to organizational goals that enable the entire organization to create relevant value for customers of choice. Integrated knowledge is needed to guide demand and supply integration decisions. Organizations do not create value for themselves or their customers without closely collaborating across both internal functions and with their supply chain partners to share knowledge about customer value, supply chain capabilities and constraints. Arrangements made with partners become much more than simple buy-sell transactions and include joint coordination and planning, and, most importantly, a willingness to share both information and risk. Structures and processes need to be 18 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMER 2015
HOW WELL DOES YOUR COMPANY INTEGRATE DEMAND AND SUPPLY? To take a short questionnaire to help you assess the current stage of your company’s demand and supply integration, visit the online version of this article at http://sloanreview.mit .edu/x/56403 and see the “How Well Does Your Company Integrate Demand and Supply?” section of the article.
put in place to facilitate information flow and create visibility across the organization and its partners. Pursuit of relevant value requires making choices. Without an understanding of which customers matter most, every decision within a company becomes a territorial battle across the demand and supply divide. Strategic direction is required to better manage supply and meet demand. A deep understanding of which customers are the most important to the company helps managers make the best decisions about how to invest their time and money. Excellence is not enough. Daily execution requires coordination between operations and demand-generating functions to deliver the required level of value to each customer on each transaction so that it generates economic profit. Flexibility and fluidity of process are required, fostered by internal alignment across operational activities. Rules, work arrangements and incentives may all need to be revised to keep everyone focused on the success of the partnership. If an organization only makes incremental improvements, it should expect only incremental increases to its profits. More dramatic gains in profitability require a radical overhaul to high-level organizational thinking. Our research suggests that demand and supply integration offers one such pathway to creating a culture that recognizes that an organization cannot simultaneously be all things to all customers. Instead, demand and supply integration helps companies get ahead by enabling organizations to make tough decisions about how to allocate scarce resources to optimize creation of value — and for which customers. Wendy L. Tate and Diane Mollenkopf are both associate professors of supply chain management at the Haslam College of Business, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Theodore Stank is a professor of logistics and supply chain management at the Haslam College of Business. Andrea Lago da Silva is an associate professor of industrial engineering at the Federal University of São Carlos in Brazil. Comment on this article at http://sloanreview.mit.edu/x/56403, or contact the authors at
[email protected].
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are grateful for the financial support granted by FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation) through the processes n° 2011/06008-8 and nº 2014/02389-5. Reprint 56403. Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. All rights reserved. SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU
MIT SL SLO OAN MANA MANAGEMEN GEMENT T REVIEW OPERA OPERATIONS TIONS
PDFs
Reprints
Permission to Copy
Back Issues
Articles published in MIT Sloan Management Review are copyrighted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology unless otherwise specified at the end of an article. MIT Sloan Management Review articles, permissions, and back issues can be purchased on our Web site: sloanreview.mit.edu or you may order through our Business Service Center (9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET) at the phone numbers listed below. Paper reprints are available in quantities of 250 or more. To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan Management Review articles by electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying or archiving in any information storage or retrieval system) requires written permission. To request permission, use our Web site: sloanreview.mit.edu or E-mail:
[email protected] Call (US and International):617-253-7170 Fax: 617-258-9739 Posting of full-text SMR articles on publicly accessible Internet sites is prohibited. To obtain permission to post articles on secure and/or passwordprotected intranet sites, e-mail your request to
[email protected].
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. All rights reserved.
Reprint #56403
http://mitsmr.com/1SkY5QL
