MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, May 2001, p. 3482–3490 0270-7306/01/$04.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3482–3490.2001 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vol. 21, No. 10
Interaction between hnRNPA1 and IB␣ Is Required for Maximal Activation of NF-B-Dependent Transcription DAVID C. HAY,1 GRAHAM D. KEMP,1 CATHERINE DARGEMONT,2
AND
RONALD T. HAY1*
Institute of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, The North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9ST, Scotland,1 and Institut Jacques Monod, UMR 7592, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France2 Received 30 October 2000/Returned for modification 13 November 2000/Accepted 20 February 2001
Transcriptional activation of NF-B is mediated by signal-induced phosphorylation and degradation of its inhibitor, IB␣. NF-B activation induces a rapid resynthesis of IB␣ which is responsible for postinduction repression of transcription. Following resynthesis, IB␣ translocates to the nucleus, removes template bound NF-B, and exports NF-B to the cytoplasm in a transcriptionally inactive form. Here we demonstrate that IB␣ interacts directly with another nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein, hnRNPA1, both in vivo and in vitro. This interaction requires one of the N-terminal RNA binding domains of hnRNPA1 and the C-terminal region of IB␣. Cells lacking hnRNPA1 are defective in NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation, but the defect in these cells is complemented by ectopic expression of hnRNPA1. hnRNPA1 expression in these cells increased the amount of IB␣ degradation, compared to that of the control cells, in response to activation by EpsteinBarr virus latent membrane protein 1. Thus in addition to regulating mRNA processing and transport, hnRNPA1 also contributes to the control of NF-B-dependent transcription. ubiquitination of IB␣ (26, 43, 56, 62, 67, 70, 74). After IB␣ degradation, NF-B translocates to the nucleus, where it induces the transcription of several genes, including that of its inhibitor, IB␣. Following IB␣ mRNA translation, newly synthesized IB␣ is accumulated in the cytoplasm and also in the nucleus, where it terminates NF-B transcriptional activity (1). Termination of NF-B-dependent transcription is achieved by inhibition of the NF-B–DNA interaction and export of NF-B back to the cytoplasm (2). The mechanism by which IB␣ localizes to the nucleus has not been precisely defined, but IB␣ does not contain a region of basic residues that resembles previously characterized NLSs. However, nuclear entry of IB␣ is conferred by a cis-acting nuclear import sequence located in the second ankyrin repeat which can also functionally substitute for the classical NLS in nucleoplasmin (54). Reconstitution of the nuclear import pathway in vitro indicates that IB␣ is transported into the nucleus by a “piggy-back” mechanism that involves additional uncharacterized NLS-containing proteins that recognize the ankyrin repeats of IB␣ (65). Nuclear export of IB␣ is conferred by leucine-rich nuclear export sequences present in the carboxyterminal (2) and amino-terminal (32) regions of the protein. The nuclear protein CRM1 (exportin 1), which belongs to the karyopherin  family (20), has been identified as the nuclear export sequence receptor (19, 21, 44, 57) and forms a complex with IB␣ in the presence of GTP-bound Ran. It has been proposed that this ternary complex is transported through the nuclear pore complex and dissociates in the cytoplasm due to GTP hydrolysis by Ran, induced by Ran GTPase activating protein (19). While nuclear export of the NF-B–IB␣ complex can be demonstrated during the process of postinduction repression, pharmacological inhibition of CRM1 with leptomycin B leads to the nuclear accumulation of NF-B and IB␣ even in the uninduced state. Thus nuclear and cytoplasmic shuttling of IB␣ is a highly dynamic process which, in unactivated cells, establishes a steady state where NF-B is pre-
The NF-B/Rel family of transcription factors is composed of a number of structurally related, interacting proteins that bind DNA and whose activity is regulated by subcellular location. In vertebrates, this family includes p50 and p105, p52 and p100, and p65 Rel A, c-Rel, or Rel B, which bind DNA in a homo- or heterodimeric fashion and are implicated in regulation of a number of cellular genes involved in immune, inflammatory, and antiapoptotic responses (3, 5). Following cellular activation, NF-B, typically a p50-p65 heterodimer, translocates to the nucleus and activates transcription of NF-Bresponsive genes. NF-B dimerization, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding are facilitated by a conserved region known as the Rel homology domain. NF-B transcriptional activity is controlled by the inhibitor IB proteins, whose association with the NF-B p50 and p65 subunits occludes their nuclear localization signals (NLSs), thereby leading to cytoplasmic sequestration, but also inhibits NF-B DNA binding activity (27). Several IBs have been described, including IB␣ (25), IB (63), IBε (68), Bcl 3 (42), and the precursors of p50 (p105) and p52 (p100), which possess inhibitory ankyrin repeat domains that in isolation are known as IB␥ and IB␦. Following signal induction, IB␣ is phosphorylated on serine 32 and serine 36 (8, 10, 52, 64) by the dimeric IB kinase (16, 38, 47, 71, 75). Subsequently, IB␣ is ubiquitinated on lysine 21 and lysine 22 (4, 51, 55), which targets the protein for degradation by the proteosome 26S complex. Although signalinduced modifications of IB␣ are targeted to the N-terminal domain, the carboxyl-terminal domain of IB␣ is also required for proteasome-mediated degradation (9, 34). Recognition of phosphorylated IB␣ is accomplished by -TrCP, which is a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex which mediates
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, The North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9ST, Scotland, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1334 463396. Fax: 44 1334 462595. E-mail:
[email protected]. 3482
VOL. 21, 2001
INTERACTION BETWEEN IB␣ AND hnRNPA1
dominantly cytoplasmic (13, 23, 28, 32, 35, 48, 53, 61). Although the precise function of IB␣ nuclear export has yet to be defined, the constant surveillance of the nucleus by IB␣ results in tight and finely tuned control of NF-B-dependent transcription. In this study we demonstrate that IB␣ interacts directly and specifically, in vitro and in vivo, with another nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1). This interaction is mediated by the C-terminal region of IB␣ and one of the N-terminal RNA binding domains of hnRNPA1. In cells lacking hnRNPA1, NF-B activation is defective, but reintroduction of hnRNPA1 into these cells restores an efficient NF-B response to signal induction. In the absence of hnRNPA1, IB␣ does not undergo signal-induced degradation, but IB␣ degradation in response to Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (EBV LMP-1) (60) is restored by ectopic expression of hnRNPA1. Thus in addition to regulating splicing, polyadenylation, and mRNA transport (17), hnRNPA1 also contributes to the control of NF-B-dependent transcription. MATERIAL AND METHODS Plasmid construction. pV44ER.LexA and pKV701.VP16 (31) were received from Colin Goding (Marie Curie Research Institute, Oxted, United Kingdom), and pACT (18) was obtained from Stephen Elledge (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.). pLexA-hnRNPA1 and pLexA-IB␣ N-T, the DNA binding domain plasmids in this study, were obtained by subcloning the genes from BamHI/EcoRI sites of pCDNA3 constructs into BamHI/EcoRI-digested pV44ER.LexA. The activation domain plasmids pVP16-IB␣, pACT-lysRS (58), and pACT-Ubch9 (15) were obtained from Lesley Stark and Jill Thomson (University of St. Andrews). The IB␣ wild type and IB␣ S32A S36A SV5 tag were a gift from Manuel Rodriguez (University of St. Andrews). For in vitro protein-protein interactions, the hnRNPA1 wild type and derivatives, IB␣ wild type (49) and derivatives, and -galactosidase (-Gal) chimeras (34) were expressed as [35S]methionine-labeled proteins (Promega in vitro transcriptiontranslation kit). All hnRNPA1 cDNAs and derivatives and IB␣ truncations were amplified by PCR oligonucleotides containing BamHI and an EcoRI site, digested with both enzymes, and cloned into BamHI- and EcoRI-cut pCDNA3. The IB␣ and hnRNPA1 wild types and truncated forms of the proteins were expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. All cDNAs used were amplified by PCR oligonucleotides with a BamHI site and an EcoRI site, digested, and cloned into BamHI- and EcoRI-cut pGEX 2T. To allow expression in vivo, the IB␣ and hnRNPA1 wild-type and truncated forms were amplified by PCR oligonucleotides with a BamHI site and an EcoRI site, digested, and cloned into BamHI- and EcoRI-cut pcDNA3 SV5 (14). The DNA sequences of the inserts in all new constructions were determined by automated DNA sequencing (Alex Houston, St. Andrews DNA sequencing service). Western blot analysis antibodies. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis in 10% polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting as described previously (58). Primary antibodies to p50 (residues 35 to 381), p65 (residues 12 to 317), and IB␣ (residues 1 to 317) were raised in sheep (Scottish Antibody Production Unit, Carluke, Scotland) and were antigen affinity purified. The primary polyclonal antibody to IB␣, C-21, was raised in rabbit and purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Mouse monoclonal antibody 10B, which recognizes IB␣ (30), was obtained from Ellis Jaffray (University of St. Andrews), mouse monoclonal antibody which recognizes the SV5 tag (22) was obtained from Dan Young (University of St. Andrews), mouse monoclonal antibody which recognizes myc-tagged proteins was obtained from Bernie Precious (University of St. Andrews), and monoclonal antibody 4B10, which recognizes hnRNPA1, was a kind gift from G. Dreyfuss (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia). The secondary antibodies used to detect immobilized antibody-antigen complexes were anti-sheep horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (DAKO) and anti-mouse HRP (Amersham). Affinity purification of protein complexes containing IB␣. A frozen cell pellet from a 200-liter culture of B cells (Namalwa) was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM tetra-sodium pyrophoshate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM -glycerophosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM sodium phos-
3483
phate buffer [pH 7.5], 0.5% NP-40) containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors (100 M Pefablock, 1 mM N␣-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone, 50 g of Bestatin/ml, 1 M pepstatin, and 1 M Leupeptin). Following cellular disruption by sonication, the extract was clarified by centrifugation (20,000 ⫻ g) for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and recentrifuged (100,000 ⫻ g) for 60 min at 4°C to remove any particulate material. The supernatant was passed through a 1-ml protein A Sepharose column and then through a 1-ml preimmune column (preimmune sheep immunoglobulin G [IgG] covalently cross-linked to protein A Sepharose), and finally through a 1-ml anti-IB␣ column (antigen affinity-purified IgG from sheep covalently cross-linked to protein A Sepharose). Immunoaffinity matrices were prepared as described previously (24). Anti-IB␣ and preimmune columns were washed with 150 ml of lysis buffer followed by 50 ml of 10 mM triethylamine (pH 8.0). Bound proteins were eluted using 15 ml of 100 mM acetic acid. Proteins eluted from each column were freeze-dried overnight, resuspended in H2O, and trichloroacetic acid precipitated prior to fractionation by electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS. Polypeptides were visualized by staining with Coomassie R450. Protein sequencing. Coomassie-stained polypeptides were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion, microbore high-pressure liquid chromatography fractionation, and protein sequencing as described previously (14). Immunoprecipitation. Preimmune sheep IgG, sheep antigen affinity-purified anti-p65, sheep antigen affinity-purified anti-IB␣, monoclonal 4B10 (antihnRNPA1), and monoclonal 336 (anti-SV5 tag) were covalently cross-linked to protein A beads (24). Antibody-linked beads (10 l) were incubated with cell extract (1 mg of protein) in incubation buffer (100 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM Tris-acetate, 10 mg of bovine serum albumin [BSA]/ml, and 0.05% NP-40 [pH 7.5]), washed three times with the same buffer and once in distilled water. Immobilized complexes were resuspended in loading buffer (1.25% SDS and 0.35 M 2-mercaptoethanol) and resolved by electrophoresis in 10% polyacrylamide gels containing SDS. Following Western blotting, IB␣- and hnRNPA1-containing complexes were detected using monoclonal antibodies 10B and 4B10, respectively. Immobilized antibody-antigen complexes were visualized with anti-mouse HRP and ECL. In vitro binding studies. Glutathione beads (10 l) containing 10 g of the respective fusion protein were blocked for 1 h prior to use in phospate-buffered saline containing 10 mg of BSA/ml. After blocking, beads were washed once with the incubation buffer, resuspended in the same buffer with the appropriate volume of the in vitro transcription and translation product, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with incubation buffer and once in distilled water. Immobilized complexes were resuspended in loading buffer and separated by electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS, and radioactive species were detected using a phosphorimager (Fuji Bas 1500). In vitro transcription and translation. To generate 35S-labeled IB␣ and hnRNPA1 proteins, pCDNA and the appropriate linearized cDNA constructs were used as the template in the TNT coupled-wheat germ extract system (Promega). Proteins were translated in a final volume of 50 l in the presence of 20 Ci of 35S-labeled methionine (Amersham). Proteins expressed were detected and standardized using a phosphorimager (Fuji Bas 1500). Yeast II hybrid analysis. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae L40 reporter strain was used in the yeast II hybrid interaction assay, and transformations were carried out as described previously (58). Cotransformants were grown on Sabouraud’s dextrose plates with differing levels of 3-amino triazole (3AT) (0 to 30 mM), and -Gal activity was measured qualitatively using filter lifts. Purification of GST fusion proteins and recombinant preparation. GST fusion proteins were purified from isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced Escherichia coli by binding to glutathione agarose, essentially as described previously (30). Fusion proteins bound to beads were washed with lysis buffer, and a small fraction of the beads was resuspended in gel loading buffer, and eluted protein was resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Coomassie blue staining using BSA as a standard was used to quantitate GST fusion proteins bound to the glutathione agarose beads. Fusion proteins were eluted from the beads in a solution containing 10 mM glutathione, 0.5 M NaCl, and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and cleaved with thrombin. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM) was added to stop the reaction, and the resulting solution was dialyzed overnight (against phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5 M NaCl and 2 mM dithiothreitol) to remove excess glutathione. GST and incompletely cleaved GST fusion proteins were removed from the protein preparations by passage over a glutathione agarose column. Protein purity was determined by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Electroporation, reporter assays, and Western blotting. Hela or CB3 cells (5 ⫻ 106) were incubated in 50 l of 200 mM NaCl containing 10 g of plasmid DNAs, 30 g of salmon testes DNA (Sigma) and electroporated (Easyject plus; EquiBio) at 240 V and 1,200 mA for 40 ms. Following electroporation, cells were
3484
HAY ET AL.
MOL. CELL. BIOL.
FIG. 1. Affinity purification of IB␣ complexes from a B-cell extract. A protein extract from Namalwa cells was first passed through a column of protein A Sepharose and then through a column of preimmune IgG linked to protein A Sepharose (PI) and finally through a column of anti-IB␣ IgG linked to protein A Sepharose (␣-IB␣). The cell extract prior to passage over the affinity columns (Load) and after passage over the affinity columns (FT) was analyzed by Western blotting (WB) with an IB␣ antibody (A). Proteins bound to the immunoaffinity matrices were eluted with acetic acid (HAc), and each of the fractions (lanes 1 to 4) was analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to IB␣ (B), NF-B p65 (C), NF-B p50 (D), or Coomassie blue staining of the polyacrylamide gel (E). Stained polypeptides were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion, and peptides were sequenced by Edman degradation. The sequence output and identification of the peptides are indicated (F).
incubated in growth medium for 16 h and processed for luciferase and -Gal activity as described previously (50) or ECL Western blotting (58). Oligonucleotide primers. Oligonucleotide sequences are shown in sense orientation with restriction sites underlined. Forward primers were as follows: hnRNPA1 1–320, GTCGGATCCATGTCTAAGTCAGAGTCTCCT; hnRNPA1 196–320, AGAGGATCCATGAGTGGTTCTGGAAACTTTGGT; hnRNPA165– 320, ATTATATGGATCCGTGGAGGAGGTGGATGCAGCT; hnRNPA1 75–320, ATAGGATCCATGAGGCCACACAAGGTGGAT; hnRNPA1 85– 320, TAGGATCCATGGAACCAAAGAGAGCTGTCTCC; hnRNPA1 90–320, CGGATCCATGGTCTCCAGAGAAGATTCT; hnRNPA1 95–320, ATAGGATC CATGTCTCAAAGACCAGGTGCC; hnRNPA1 105–320, GCGGGCGGATCC ATGAAAAAGATATTTGTTGGTGGC; hnRNPA1 142–320, AGTCGGATCCA TGAGTGGCAAGAAAAGGGGCTTT; hnRNPA1 162–320, GCGCCGCGGGA TCCATGATTGTCATTCAGAAATACCAT; hnRNPA1 182–320, CGGGATCC ATGTCAAAGCAAGAGATGGCTAGT; and IB␣ 1-317, GTACTAGGATCCA TGTTCCAGGCGGCCGAG. Reverse primers were as follows: hnRNPA1 320–1, GCCGCGAATTCTTAA AATCTTCTGCCACTGCC; hnRNPA1 320–1(-SC), CGGAATTCAAATCTT CTGCCACTGCC; hnRNPA1 267–1, TATATTAAATTGAATTCGTTGTAAT TCCCAAAATCATT; hnRNPA1 247–1, CGCGGGAATTCAAATCCATTAT AGCCATCCCC; hnRNPA1 227–1, AGAATTCGCCACCACGACCACTGAAG TT; hnRNPA1 207–1, CGAATTCTCCACGACCACCACCAAAGTT; hnRNPA1 196–1, GGAATTCTCGACCTCTTTGGCTGGA; IB␣ 296-1, CGCGAATTCTG ACGTGAACTCTGACTCTGT; IB␣ 303–1, CGAATTCTGACAGCTCGTCCT CTGTGAA; and IB␣ 313-1, CGAATTCTGACTGGCCTCCAAACACACA.
RESULTS hnRNPA1 interacts with IB␣. To identify proteins involved in the activity of the transcription factor NF-B, proteins
bound to the IB␣ inhibitor were isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography. An extract from Namalwa cells was first passed over a column of protein A agarose. The flow-through from this column was then passed over a second column of protein A agarose to which preimmune IgG was linked. Finally the extract was passed over a protein A column to which anti-IB␣ was linked. Both IgG columns were extensively washed, and bound proteins were eluted from the separated columns with acetic acid. Western blot analysis of the load and flow-through fractions with an IB␣ antibody indicated that IB␣ was present in the cell extract but was absent from the flow-through (Fig. 1A). Western blot analysis of the acetic acid eluates indicated that IB␣ along with NF-B p50 and p65 were bound to and eluted from the anti-IB␣ column but were not present in the eluate from the preimmune column (Fig. 1B, C, and D). These data indicate that the immunoaffinity purification procedure was functioning efficiently. Eluted proteins were fractionated by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel containing SDS and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. In addition to the NF-B and IB␣ proteins, a prominent species migrating as a doublet of 34 and 38 kDa was identified (Fig. 1E). After in-gel digestion with trypsin and high-pressure liquid chromatography fractionation, a number of peptides were analyzed by Edman degradation. Sequence analysis indicated that peptides from both species were derived from hnRNPA1
VOL. 21, 2001
INTERACTION BETWEEN IB␣ AND hnRNPA1
3485
TABLE 1. hnRNPA1 interacts with IB␣ in vivoa Construct
pLexA-hnRNP A1, pVP16.701 vector pV44ER.LexA vector, pVP16-IB␣ wt pLexA-hnRNP A1, pVP16-IB␣ wt pLexA-hnRNPA1, pACT-lysRS pLexA-IB␣ N-T, pACT-Ubch9
Growth of yeast
Colony (⫹ His) (⫺ His ⫹ 3AT) color
⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹ ⫹
⫺ ⫺ ⫹ ⫺ ⫹
White White Blue White Blue
a S. cerevisiae reporter strain L40 was cotransformed with the following combinations of plasmid: pLexA-hnRNPA1 and pVP16-IB␣ wt (test plasmids); pLexA-hnRNPA1 and pACT-lysRS (negative control); pLexA-hnRNPA1 and pVP16.701 empty vector; pLexA-IB␣ N-T and pACT-Ubch9 (positive control); and pV44ER.LexA empty vector and pVP16-IB␣ wt. Transformed yeast cells were grown either on medium containing histidine (⫹ His) or on medium lacking histidine but containing 8 mM 3AT (⫺ His ⫹ 3AT). Filter lift assays were used to determine if the yeast expressed -Gal activity. In the presence of chromogenic substrate, colonies which express -Gal are blue and colonies which do not express the enzyme are white.
FIG. 2. Interaction between IB␣ and hnRNPA1 in HeLa cells. (A) Extracts from HeLa cells were immunoprecipitated with preimmune IgG (PI), antibodies to NF-B p65 (␣-p65), or antibodies to IB␣ (␣-IB␣), and immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting with the 4B10 monoclonal antibody to hnRNPA1 (WB ␣-hnRNPA1) or the 10B monoclonal antibody to IB␣ (WB ␣-IB␣). (B) Extracts from HeLa cells were immunoprecipitated with the 4B10 monoclonal antibody (␣-hnRNPA1) or an irrelevant monoclonal antibody (␣-SV5) and analyzed by Western blotting with the 4B10 monoclonal antibody to hnRNPA1 (WB ␣-hnRNPA1) or the 10B monoclonal antibody to IB␣ (WB ␣-IB␣).
(Fig. 1F), which shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and is involved in export of mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. The 34-kDa species is the most abundant form of A1, while the 38-kDa form, termed A1B, is a differentially spliced form of A1 containing an additional exon (11). To confirm the interactions between endogenous hnRNPA1 and IB␣–NF-B complexes, HeLa cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibodies to p65, IB␣, or preimmune IgG. Immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with monoclonal antibodies recognizing hnRNPA1 or IB␣. Both forms of hnRNPA1 were immunoprecipitated by antibodies directed against IB␣ or NF-B p65 but not by preimmune IgG (Fig. 2A). As expected, IB␣ was immunoprecipitated by antibodies to both p65 and IB␣ (Fig. 2A). IB␣ was also detected in immunoprecipitates using an hnRNPA1 monoclonal antibody but was not detected when an irrelevant monoclonal antibody was used (Fig. 2B). The interaction between hnRNPA1 and IB␣ was also examined in a heterologous system using the yeast two-hybrid system. When the yeast L40 reporter strain was cotransformed with the LexA hnRNPA1 and IB␣-VP16 expression constructs, an interaction between the two expressed proteins was detected. Thus the yeast could grow on minimal medium containing 3AT but lacking histidine and could activate the LexAdependent -Gal reporter (Table 1). Appropriate positive and negative controls confirmed the specificity of this interaction (Table 1). hnRNPA1 interacts directly with IB␣ in vitro. To determine that the interaction between hnRNPA1 and IB␣ was direct and was not mediated by a bridging protein present in the human cell extracts or in the yeast, interactions were stud-
ied using bacterially produced recombinant proteins. GSThnRNPA1 was allowed to interact with IB␣ in the presence or absence of NF-B p50 or p65. Bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with an IB␣ antibody. GST-hnRNPA1 bound IB␣ irrespective of whether it was bound to p50 or p65 (Fig. 3A). As a positive control, GST-p65 was shown to interact with IB␣ under all conditions, while no interaction with hnRNPA1 was demonstrable with either GST, GST-IB␥, or GST-NFIII (Fig. 3A). To determine if hnRNPA1 could interact with p65, GST and GST fusion proteins GST-IB␣ and GST-hnRNPA1 were incubated with 35S-labeled in vitro-translated p65. Analysis of the bound proteins indicated that GST and GST-hnRNPA1 did not interact with p65 (Fig. 3B), where-
FIG. 3. hnRNPA1 interacts directly with IB␣ in vitro. (A) Recombinant IB␣ (present in all lanes) and NF-B p50 and NF-B p65 (as indicated) were incubated with either GST, GST-NFIII, GST-IB␥, GST-p65, or GST-hnRNPA1 immobilized on glutathione agarose. Bound proteins were eluted and analyzed by Western blotting with the 10B monoclonal antibody to IB␣. (B) In vitro-translated 35S-labeled p65 was incubated with GST-IB␣, GST-hnRNPA1 fusion proteins, and GST immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging.
3486
HAY ET AL.
FIG. 4. hnRNPA1 binds to the C terminus of IB␣. (A) Diagrammatic representation of IB␣ and truncated versions of IB␣, with their abilities to bind to hnRNPA1 indicated. (B) In vitro-translated, [35S]methionine-labeled hnRNPA1 was incubated with GST, GSTNFIII, GST-IB␥, GST-IB␣ wild type (WT), and GST-IB␣ truncation mutants immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. The location of 35S-labeled hnRNPA1 is indicated (A1). (C) In vitro-translated 35S-labeled -Gal or fusions with either the N terminus of IB␣ (N-T), the C terminus of IB␣ (C-T), or both the N and C termini of IB␣ (CT ⫹ NT) were incubated with either GST or GST-hnRNPA1 immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. (D) In vitro-translated, 35 S-labeled IB␣ wild type (WT) or truncation mutants were incubated with either GST or GST-hnRNPA1 immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. The input in vitro-translated products are shown in the right-hand panel.
as GST-IB␣ bound the 35S-labeled p65. Thus hnRNPA1 interacts directly with IB␣ and does not interact with p65. hnRNPA1 binds to the C terminus of IB␣. To identify the region of IB␣ required for interaction with hnRNPA1, a series of deleted IB␣ molecules were fused to GST (Fig. 4A) and tested for their ability to interact with 35S-labeled in vitrotranslated hnRNPA1. Fusion proteins which contained sequences from the C terminus of IB␣ were capable of binding with wild-type affinity to hnRNP1, while GST fusions which lacked the C-terminal region were unable to interact with hnRNPA1. While the GST fusion containing IB␣ residues 265 to 317 bound hnRNPA1, a fusion containing IB␣ residues 275 to 317 was unable to bind hnRNPA1 (Fig. 4B). Neither GST-IB␥, GST-NFIII, nor GST displayed any interaction with hnRNPA1 (Fig. 4B). To confirm the role of the IB␣ C terminus in the interaction with hnRNPA1, a previously de-
MOL. CELL. BIOL.
scribed series of LacZ molecules linked to either the IB␣ C terminus, N terminus, or both the N and C termini were utilized (34). 35S-labeled in vitro-translated forms of these molecules were tested for interaction with either GST or GSThnRNPA1. While the construct containing only the IB␣ N-terminal domain failed to interact with hnRNPA1, both constructs which contained the IB␣ C-terminal region were bound by GST-hnRNPA1 (Fig. 4C). To delimit the C-terminal boundary of the IB␣ region required for interaction with hnRNPA1, a previously described series of IB␣ molecules (49) with deletions in various regions of the C terminus were used. In vitro-translated 35S-labeled IB␣ molecules were tested for their abilities to interact with either GST or GSThnRNPA1. None of the C-terminally deleted IB␣ molecules bound GST hnRNPA1 (Fig. 4D). Thus the IB␣ region required for interaction with hnRNPA1 has boundaries of between residues 265 and 275 at the N terminus and residues 292 and 317 at the C terminus. An hnRNPA1 RNA binding domain is required for interaction with IB␣. To identify the domain in hnRNPA1 required for interaction with IB␣, a strategy analogous to that employed with IB␣ was adopted. hnRNPA1 is a multidomain protein that contains two RNA binding domains in the Nterminal half of the protein (72), an RGG box, which also constitutes an RNA binding motif (33), in the central region, and the M9 nuclear import and export sequence in the Cterminal region (29) (Fig. 5A). A series of GST-hnRNPA1 fusions were constructed in which sequences from the N and C termini had been progressively deleted. Equal molar amounts of each bacterially expressed fusion protein were incubated with 35S-labeled in vitro-translated IB␣, and bound proteins were collected on glutathione agarose. Removal of sequences between residues 207 and the C terminus (1 to 207) did not affect binding of IB␣, whereas an hnRNPA1 molecule containing only residues 1 to 196 was unable to bind IB␣ (Fig. 5B and C). In addition, GST fusions containing hnRNPA1 sequences between residues 95 and 320 bound IB␣ efficiently, whereas a fusion containing hnRNPA1 residues 105 to 320 was unable to bind IB␣ (Fig. 5D). These data were confirmed using 35S-labeled IB␣ and GST-hnRNPA1 and truncated forms (Fig. 5E). Thus sequences in hnRNPA1 between residues 95 and 207, a region which encompasses a single RNA binding domain, are required for interaction with IB␣. hnRNPA1 enhances NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation. To determine the functional consequences of the interaction between IB␣ and hnRNPA1, we obtained a mouse erythroleukemia cell line (CB3) which lacks endogenous hnRNPA1 (7). It was thus possible to introduce hnRNPA1 into these cells and evaluate its influence on NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation. CB3 cells were electroporated with an NF-B-dependent luciferase reporter and expression constructs for wild-type and mutant forms of hnRNPA1 in either the presence or absence of constructs expressing EBV LMP-1. EBV LMP-1 is a potent inducer of signal transduction pathways that lead to NF-B activation (60), and expression levels of this protein were adjusted to ensure that the NF-B response was not saturated. In the absence of hnRNPA1, EBV LMP-1 expression results in a 13-fold increase in NF-B-dependent reporter activity. In the presence of hnRNPA1 and LMP-1, reporter activity was increased to 101-fold over that
VOL. 21, 2001
FIG. 5. An hnRNPA1 RNA binding domain is required for interaction with IB␣. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the hnRNPA1 molecule with the two RNA binding domains (RBD), the RGG box, and the M9 nuclear transport signal indicated. Truncation mutants used in this study and their abilities to bind IB␣ are indicated. (B and C) In vitro-translated, 35S-labeled hnRNPA1 wild type (WT) or truncation mutants were incubated with either GST, GST-IB␣, or GSTIB␣265–317 immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. (D) In vitrotranslated, 35S-labeled hnRNPA1 wild type (WT) or truncation mutants were incubated with GST or GST-IB␣ immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. (E) In vitro-translated 35S-labeled IB␣ was incubated with GST, GST-hnRNPA1 wild type (WT), or GST-hnRNPA1 truncation mutants immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging.
observed in the absence of hnRNPA1 and LMP-1 (Fig. 6B). hnRNP1 mutants which did not interact with IB␣ (105–320 and 1–196 constructs) failed to substantially increase LMP-1activated NF-B reporter activity, whereas mutants which were capable of interacting with IB␣ (95–320 and 1–207 constructs) increased LMP-1-activated NF-B reporter activity above that for the pCDNA control (Fig. 6B). Western blotting indicated that the wild-type and mutant forms of hnRNPA1 were expressed at comparable levels and that proteins containing the M9 shuttling domain (40) (wild type and 95–320 and 105–320 constructs) were nuclear, whereas proteins lacking the M9 domain (1–196 and 1–207 constructs) were cytoplasmic
INTERACTION BETWEEN IB␣ AND hnRNPA1
3487
FIG. 6. hnRNPA1 enhances NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation. (A and B) The NF-B-dependent luciferase reporter 3 enh conA luc and the RSV-lacZ reporter were electroporated with pCDNA3 empty vector or pCDNA3 expression constructs containing either the wild-type (WT) hnRNPA1 cDNA (A1) or the indicated truncation mutants into CB3 cells which do not express hnRNPA1. (A) Expression levels of hnRNPA1 were determined by Western blotting. (B) To provide an NF-B activation signal, cells were electroporated with an expression construct containing the cDNA for EBV LMP-1 or empty vector. Sixteen hours after electroporation, cells were lysed for determination of luciferase and LacZ activity. The activity of the Rous sarcoma virus LacZ reporter was used as an internal control, and the values indicated represented the ratio of luciferase activity to LacZ activity. Assays were performed in triplicate, and error bars represent 1 standard deviation. (C) The control experiments using ConA Luc and AP1 ConA Luc were performed as described above, in duplicate, and results are quoted in relative light units per milligram of protein.
(Fig. 6A). Neither LMP-1 nor hnRNPA1 had any influence on the activity of a control luciferase reporter lacking NF-B binding sites (Fig. 6B) or on a LacZ reporter with an RSV promoter (data not shown) which was employed as an internal control. An AP1-dependent luciferase reporter which was activated fivefold by cotransfected LMP-1 was not further activated by expression of hnRNPA1 (Fig. 6). Thus a lack of hnRNPA1 expression in CB3 cells results in defective NF-Bdependent transcriptional activation, and this can be rectified by expression of exogenous hnRNPA1.
3488
HAY ET AL.
MOL. CELL. BIOL.
undergo EBV LMP-1-induced degradation (Fig. 7B). To determine the sequences in IB␣ that are required for degradation, C-terminally truncated forms of IB␣ were tested for their ability to undergo EBV LMP-1-induced degradation in the presence of hnRNPA1. While an IB␣ construct containing residues 1 to 303, which interacts with hnRNPA1, was efficiently degraded in the presence of EBV LMP-1 and hnRNPA1, a construct containing residues 1 to 292, which did not interact with hnRNPA1, was not degraded (Fig. 7C). DISCUSSION
FIG. 7. hnRNPA1 enhances IB␣ processing in response to LMP-1 activation. (A, B, and C) IB␣ wild type (WT) and the S32A S36A, 1–292, and 1–303 constructs were electroporated with pcDNA 3 empty vector or pcDNA 3 expression constructs containing either hnRNPA1 cDNA or the indicated truncation mutants into CB3 cells which do not express hnRNPA1. To provide an NF-B activation signal, cells were electroporated with an expression construct containing the cDNA for EBV LMP-1 or empty vector. To control for the level of transfection between the different conditions, the cells were transfected with an expression construct containing the cDNA for pyruvate kinase with a myc tag. Sixteen hours posttransfection the cells were lysed and separated by SDS–10% PAGE. Following separation, cells were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and analyzed using the SV5 monoclonal antibody to SV5-tagged proteins and the myc monoclonal antibody to myc-tagged proteins.
hnRNPA1 enhances NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation by potentiating IB␣ degradation. To determine the level at which hnRNPA1 expression potentiates NF-B activation, plasmids expressing a tagged version of IB␣ and hnRNPA1 were introduced into CB3 cells in the presence or absence of cotransfected DNA encoding EBV LMP-1. Western blotting indicated that LMP-1-induced degradation of IB␣ is not apparent in the absence of hnRNPA1 but is efficient in the presence of hnRNPA1 (Fig. 7A). Analysis of various deletion forms of hnRNPA1 in this assay revealed that in addition to the wild-type form, versions containing amino acids 1 to 207 and 95 to 320 also allowed IB␣ degradation, although this was less efficient with the 95–320 construct. Signal-induced degradation of IB␣ was not observed in the presence of versions of hnRNPA1, the 105–320 and 1–196 constructs which did not interact with IB␣ (Fig. 7A). Transfection efficiency was controlled by cotransfection of myc-tagged pyruvate kinase, which was detected by Western blotting (Fig. 7A). hnRNPA1 constructs were expressed at comparable levels (Fig. 6A). EBV LMP-1-induced degradation of IB␣ in the presence of hnRNPA1 was dependent on phosphorylation of S32 and S36, since an S32A, S36A mutant of IB␣ failed to
The experimental data reported here demonstrate that the IB␣ inhibitor of the transcription factor NF-B interacts directly, both in vivo and in vitro, with hnRNPA1. Cells lacking hnRNPA1 are defective in NF-B-dependent transcriptional activation, but the defect in these cells is complemented by ectopic expression of hnRNPA1. Cells lacking hnRNPA1 do not induce efficient degradation of IB␣ in response to stimuli such as EBV LMP-1. However, an efficient signal-induced degradation of IB␣ is fully restored by expression of hnRNPA1 or a derivative containing residues 1 to 207 and is partially restored with a derivative containing residues 95 to 320. While IB␣ and hnRNPA1 both shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (32, 39, 45, 50), modification of this activity by interactions between IB␣ and hnRNPA1 is unlikely to explain the role of hnRNPA1 in NF-B activation, since an hnRNPA1 molecule lacking the M9 domain, which fails to shuttle, is capable of interacting with IB␣ and restoring the NF-B response in hnRNPA1-deficient CB3 cells (Fig. 6 and 7). Thus hnRNPA1 molecules that are restricted to the cytoplasm can still complement the defect in NF-B signaling in CB3 cells. The region in hnRNPA1 which is required for interaction with IB␣ is located between residues 95 and 207. Not only is this region required for interaction between hnRNPA1 and IB␣, but it is sufficient to complement the defect in NF-B activation in CB3 cells. Amino acids 95 to 207 in hnRNPA1 constitute a single RNA recognition motif (RRM) linked to a fragment of the RGG box, which also represents an RNA binding motif (33). The proteins of an hnRNP complex are involved in diverse aspects of pre-mRNA metabolism. There is considerable evidence that suggests a role for some hnRNPs in the export of mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (39, 40, 45, 66). In addition to its presumed role in pre-mRNA packaging and transport, hnRNPA1 has other activities of biological importance. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that hnRNPA1 has the potential to influence 5⬘ splice site selection in pre-mRNAs that contain multiple 5⬘ splice sites (12, 36, 73) and promotes the renaturation of complementary single-stranded nucleic acids (41, 46). While both RRMs are required for the alternative splicing activity of hnRNPA1, a single RRM is sufficient for the RNA binding and nucleic acid annealing properties of hnRNPA1 (37). Thus it is unlikely that the mRNA transport and alternative splicing activities of hnRNPA1 are involved in the ability of hnRNPA1 to influence NF-B-dependent transcription. On the basis of this information, the possible mechanisms by which hnRNPA1 can participate in NF-B activation are limited. One possibility is that hnRNPA1 acts as a scaffold-like
VOL. 21, 2001
INTERACTION BETWEEN IB␣ AND hnRNPA1
molecule, bringing IB␣ into the optimal environment for signal-induced modification. However, preliminary investigations (data not shown) suggest that hnRNPA1 does not coprecipitate with the dimeric IB kinase ␣ or  molecules. Gel electrophoresis DNA binding assays (data not shown) also demonstrate that hnRNPA1 does not displace NF-B from IB␣; thus NF-B-dependent transcription is not potentiated in this manner. hnRNPA1 interacts with the carboxy-terminal region of IB␣. The carboxy terminus of IB␣ contributes to protein destabilization upon cell activation by different stimuli. Moreover, removal of upstream C-terminal sequences, adjacent to the PEST domain, renders the protein highly refractory to signal-induced proteolysis (6, 10, 49, 59, 69). Although we do not know the exact mechanism by which hnRNPA1 influences NF-B transcription, a potential model would involve hnRNPA1 enhancing IB␣ degradation. In this respect, it is worth noting that the C-terminal region of IB␣, required for interaction with hnRNPA1, is also required for proteasome-mediated degradation of IB␣ (34).
23.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
24.
We thank Alex Houston and Ellis Jaffray, University of St. Andrews, for DNA sequencing and purified GST fusion proteins. We are grateful to Gideon Dreyfuss, University of Pennsylvania, for supplying the 4B10 monoclonal antibody to hnRNPA1 and Yaacov Ben-David, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Canada, for providing the CB3 cell line. This work was funded by the BBSRC and supported in part by the European Union Concerted Action BIOMED II (ROCIO II project). REFERENCES 1. Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., J. Thompson, M. S. Rodriguez, F. Bachelerie, D. Thomas, and R. T. Hay. 1995. Inducible nuclear expression of newly synthesized IB␣ negatively regulates DNA-binding and transcriptional activities of NF-B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2689–2696. 2. Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., P. Turpin, M. Rodriguez, D. Thomas, R. T. Hay, J. L. Virelizier, and C. Dargemont. 1997. Nuclear localization of IB␣ promotes active transport of NF-B from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. J. Cell Sci. 110:369–378. 3. Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore. 1996. NF-B: ten years after. Cell 87:13– 20. 4. Baldi, L., K. Brown, G. Franzoso, and U. Siebenlist. 1996. Critical role for lysines 21 and 22 in signal-induced, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of IB␣. J. Biol. Chem. 271:376–379. 5. Baldwin, A. S. 1996. The NF-B and IB proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:649–683. 6. Beauparlant, P., R. T. Lin, and J. Hiscott. 1996. The role of the C-terminal domain of IB␣ in protein degradation and stabilization. J. Biol. Chem. 271:10690–10696. 7. Ben-David, Y., M. R. Bani, B. Chabot, A. De Koven, and A. Bernstein. 1992. Retroviral insertions downstream of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 gene in erythroleukemia cells: evidence that A1 is not essential for cell growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4449–4455. 8. Brockman, J. A., D. C. Scherer, T. A. McKinsey, S. M. Hall, X. X. Qi, W. Y. Lee, and D. W. Ballard. 1995. Coupling of a signal response domain in IB␣ to multiple pathways for NF-B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2809–2818. 9. Brown, K., G. Franzoso, L. Baldi, L. Carlson, L. Mills, Y. C. Lin, S. Gerstberger, and U. Siebenlist. 1997. The signal response of IB␣ is regulated by transferable N-and C-terminal domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3021–3027. 10. Brown, K., S. Gerstberger, L. Carlson, G. Franzoso, and U. Siebenlist. 1995. Control of IB␣ proteolysis by site-specific, signal-induced phosphorylation. Science 267:1485–1488. 11. Buvoli, M., F. Cobianchi, M. G. Bes´tagno, A. Mangiarotti, M. T. Bassi, G. Biamonti, and S. Riva. 1990. Alternative splicing in the human gene for the core protein A1 generates another hnRNP protein. EMBO J. 9:1229–1235. 12. Caceres, J. F., S. Stamm, D. M. Helfman, and A. R. Krainer. 1994. Regulation of alternative splicing in vivo by overexpression of antagonistic splicing factors. Science 265:1706–1709. 13. Carlotti, F., S. K. Dower, and E. E. Qwarnstrom. 2000. Dynamic shuttling of NF-B between the nucleus and cytoplasm as a consequence of inhibitor dissociation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:41028–41034. 14. Desterro, J. M. P., M. S. Rodriguez, G. D. Kemp, and R. T. Hay. 1999.
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
21. 22.
25.
26.
27. 28.
29. 30. 31.
32. 33. 34.
35. 36. 37. 38.
39. 40.
3489
Identification of the enzyme required for activation of the small ubiquitinlike protein SUMO-1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:10618–10624. Desterro, J. M. P., J. Thomson, and R. T. Hay. 1997. Ubch9 conjugates SUMO but not ubiquitin. FEBS Lett. 417:297–300. DiDonato, J. A., M. Hayakawa, D. M. Rothwarf, E. Zandi, and M. Karin. 1997. A cytokine responsive IB kinase that activates the transcription factor NF-B. Nature 388:548–554. Dreyfuss, G., M. J. Matunis, S. Pinol-Roma, and C. G. Burd. 1993. hnRNP proteins and the biogenesis of mRNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62:289–321. Durfee, T., K. Becherer, P. L. Chen, S. H. Yeh, Y. Yang, A. E. Kilburn, W. H. Lee, and S. J. Elledge. 1993. The retinoblastoma protein associates with the protein phosphatase type 1 catalytic subunit. Genes Dev. 7:555–569. Fornerod, M., M. Ohno, M. Yoshida, and I. W. Mattaj. 1997. CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 90:1051–1060. Fornerod, M., J. van Deursen, S. van Baal, A. Reynolds, D. Davis, K. G. Murti, J. Fransen, and G. Grosveld. 1997. The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88. EMBO J. 16:807–816. Fukuda, M., S. Asano, T. Nakamura, M. Adachi, M. Yoshida, M. Yanagida, and E. Nishida. 1997. CRM1 is responsible for intracellular transport mediated by the nuclear export signal. Nature 390:308–311. Hanke, T., P. Szawlowski, and R. E. Randall. 1992. Construction of solid matrix-antibody-antigen complexes containing simian immunodeficiency virus p27 using tag-specific monoclonal antibody and tag-linked antigen. J. Gen. Virol. 73:653–660. Harhaj, E. W., and S. C. Sun. 1999. Regulation of RelA subcellular localization by a putative nuclear export signal and p50. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7088– 7095. Harlow, E., and D. P. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Haskill, S., A. A. Beg, S. M. Tompkins, J. S. Morris, A. D. Yurochko, A. Sampson-Johannes, K. Mondal, P. Ralph, and A. S. Baldwin. 1991. Characterization of an immediate-early gene induced in adherent monocytes that encodes IB␣ like activity. Cell 65:1281–1289. Hatakeyama, S., M. Kitagawa, K. Nakayama, M. Shirane, M. Matsumoto, K. Hattori, H. Higashi, H. Nakano, K. Okumura, K. Onoe, R. A. Good, and K. Nakayama. 1999. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of IB␣ is mediated by a ubiquitin ligase Skp1/Cul 1/F-box protein FWD1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3859–3863. Hay, R. T., L. Vuillard, J. M. Desterro, and M. S. Rodriguez. 1999. Control of NF-B transcriptional activation by signal induced proteolysis of IB␣. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 354:1601–1609. Huang, T. T., N. Kudo, M. Yoshida, and S. Miyamoto. 2000. A nuclear export signal in the N-terminal regulatory domain of IB␣ controls cytoplasmic localization of inactive NF-B/IB␣ complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1014–1019. Izaurralde, E., A. Jarmolowski, C. Beisel, I. W. Mattaj, G. Dreyfuss, and U. Fischer. 1997. A role for the M9 transport signal of hnRNPA1 in mRNA nuclear export. J. Cell Biol. 137:27–35. Jaffray, E., K. M. Wood, and R. T. Hay. 1995. Domain organization of IB␣ and sites of interaction with NF-B p65. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2166–2172. Jayaraman, P. S., K. Hirst, and C. R. Goding. 1994. The activation domain of a basic helix-loop-helix protein is masked by repressor interaction with domains distinct from that required for transcription regulation. EMBO J. 13:2192–2199. Johnson, C., D. Van Antwerp, and T. J. Hope. 1999. An N-terminal nuclear export signal is required for the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of IB␣. EMBO J. 18:6682–6693. Kiledjian, M., and G. Dreyfuss. 1992. Primary structure and binding activity of the hnRNP U protein: binding RNA through RGG box. EMBO J. 11: 2655–2664. Kroll, M., M. Conconi, M. J. Desterro, A. Marin, D. Thomas, B. Friguet, R. T. Hay, J. L. Virelizier, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and M. S. Rodriguez. 1997. The carboxy terminus of IB␣ determines susceptibility to degradation by the catalytic core of the proteasome. Oncogene 15:1841–1850. Luque, I., W. Zong, C. Chen, and C. Gelinas. 2000. N-terminal determinants of IB␣ necessary for the cytoplasmic regulation of c-Rel. Oncogene 19: 1239–1244. Mayeda, A., and A. R. Krainer. 1992. Regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by hnRNPA1 and splicing factor SF2. Cell 68:365–375. Mayeda, A., S. H. Munroe, J. F. Caceres, and A. R. Krainer. 1994. Function of conserved domains of hnRNPA1 and other hnRNP A/B proteins. EMBO J. 13:5483–5495. Mercurio, F., H. Zhu, B. W. Murray, A. Shevchenko, B. L. Bennett, J. W. Li, D. B. Young, M. Barbosa, M. Mann, A. Manning, and A. Rao. 1997. IKK-1 and IKK-2: cytokine activated IB kinases essential for NF-B activation. Science 278:860–866. Michael, W. M., M. Choi, and G. Dreyfuss. 1995. A nuclear export signal in hnRNPA1: a signal mediated, temperature dependent nuclear protein export pathway. Cell 83:415–422. Michael, W. M., H. Siomi, M. Choi, S. Pinol-Roma, S. Nakielny, Q. Liu, and G. Dreyfuss. 1995. Signal sequences that target nuclear import and nuclear
3490
41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48.
49. 50. 51.
52. 53. 54.
55. 56. 57. 58. 59.
HAY ET AL.
export of pre-mRNA-binding proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 60:663–668. Munroe, S. H., and X. F. Dong. 1992. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 catalyzes RNA. RNA annealing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:895–899. Ohno, H., G. Takimoto, and T. W. McKeithan. 1990. The candidate protooncogene bcl-3 is related to genes implicated in cell lineage determination of cell cycle control. Cell 60:991–997. Ohta, T., J. J. Michel, A. J. Schottelius, and Y. Xiong. 1999. ROC1, a homolog of APC11, represents a family of cullin partners with an associated ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol. Cell 3:535–541. Ossareh-Nazari, B., F. Bachelerie, and C. Dargemont. 1997. Evidence for a role of CRM1 in signal-mediated nuclear protein export. Science 278:141– 144. Pinol-Roma, S., and G. Dreyfuss. 1992. Shuttling of pre-mRNA binding proteins between nucleus and cytoplasm. Nature 355:730–732. Pontius, B. W., and P. Berg. 1992. Rapid assembly and disassembly of complementary DNA strands through an equilibrium intermediate state mediated by A1 hnRNP protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267:13815–13818. Regnier, C. H., H. Y. Song, X. Gao, D. V. Goeddel, Z. D. Cao, and M. Rothe. 1997. Identification and characterization of an IB kinase. Cell 90:373–383. Renard, P., Y. Percherancier, M. Kroll, D. Thomas, J. L. Virelizier, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and F. Bachelerie. 2000. Inducible NF-B activation is permitted by simultaneous degradation of nuclear IB␣. J. Biol. Chem. 275:15193–15199. Rodriguez, M. S., I. Michalopoulos, F. Arenzanaseisdedos, and R. T. Hay. 1995. Inducible degradation of IB␣ in vitro and in vivo requires the acidic C-terminal domain of the protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2413–2419. Rodriguez, M. S., J. Thompson, R. T. Hay, and C. Dargemont. 1999. Nuclear retention of IB␣ protects it from signal-induced degradation and inhibits NF-B transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:9108–9115. Rodriguez, M. S., J. Wright, J. Thompson, D. Thomas, F. Baleux, J. L. Virelizier, R. T. Hay, and F. Arenzana-Seisdedos. 1996. Identification of lysine residues required for signal-induced ubiquitination and degradation of IB␣ in vivo. Oncogene 12:2425–2435. Roff, M., J. Thomson, M. S. Rodriguez, J.-M. Jacque, F. Baleux, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and R. T. Hay. 1996. Role of IB␣ ubiquitination in signal-induced activation of NF-B in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 271:7844–7850. Sachdev, S., S. Bagchi, D. D. Zhang, A. C. Mings, and M. Hannink. 2000. Nuclear import of IB␣ is accomplished by a ran-independent transport pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1571–1582. Sachdev, S., A. Hoffmann, and M. Hannink. 1998. Nuclear localization of IB␣ is mediated by the second ankyrin repeat: the IB␣ ankyrin repeats define a novel class of cis-acting nuclear import sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2524–2534. Scherer, D. C., J. A. Brockman, Z. Chen, T. Maniatis, and D. W. Ballard. 1995. Signal-induced degradation of IB␣ requires site-specific ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11259–11263. Spencer, E., J. Jiang, and Z. J. Chen. 1999. Signal-induced ubiquitination of IB␣ by the F-box protein Slimb/-TrCP. Genes Dev. 13:284–294. Stade, K., C. S. Ford, C. Guthrie, and K. Weis. 1997. Exportin 1 (Crm1p) is an essential nuclear export factor. Cell 90:1041–1050. Stark, L. A., and R. T. Hay. 1998. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral protein R (Vpr) interacts with Lys-tRNA synthetase: implications for priming of HIV-1 reverse transcription. J. Virol. 72:3037–3044. Sun, S. C., J. Elwood, and W. C. Greene. 1996. Both amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal sequences within IB␣ regulate its inducible degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1058–1065.
MOL. CELL. BIOL. 60. Sylla, B. S., S. C. Hung, D. M. Davidson, E. Hatzivassiliou, N. L. Malinin, D. Wallach, T. D. Gilmore, E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus-transforming protein latent infection membrane protein 1 activates transcription factor NF-B through a pathway that includes the NF-Binducing kinase and the IB kinases IKKalpha and IKKbeta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10106–10111. 61. Tam, W. F., L. H. Lee, L. Davis, and R. Sen. 2000. Cytoplasmic sequestration of rel proteins by IB␣ requires CRM1-dependent nuclear export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2269–2284. 62. Tan, P., S. Y. Fuchs, A. Chen, K. Wu, C. Gomez, Z. Ronai, and Z. Q. Pan. 1999. Recruitment of a ROC1-CUL1 ubiquitin ligase by Skp1 and HOS to catalyze the ubiquitination of IB␣. Mol. Cell 3:527–533. 63. Thompson, J. E., R. J. Phillips, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and S. Ghosh. 1995. IB regulates the persistent response in a biphasic activation of NF-B. Cell 80:573–582. 64. Traenckner, E.B.M., H. L. Pahl, T. Henkel, K. N. Schmidt, S. Wilk, and P. A. Baeuerle. 1995. Phosphorylation of human IB␣ on serine 32 and serine 36 controls IB␣ proteolysis and NF-B activation in response to diverse stimuli. EMBO J. 14:2876–2883. 65. Turpin, P., R. T. Hay, and C. Dargemont. 1999. Characterisation of the IB␣ nuclear import pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274:6804–6812. 66. Visa, N., A. T. Alzhanova-Ericsson, X. Sun, E. Kiseleva, B. Bjorkroth, T. Wurtz, and B. Daneholt. 1996. A pre-mRNA-binding protein accompanies the RNA from the gene through the nuclear pores and into polysomes. Cell 84:253–264. 67. Vuillard, L., J. Nicholson, and R. T. Hay. 1999. A complex containing -TrCP recruits Cdc34 to catalyse ubiquitination of IB␣. FEBS Lett. 455: 311–314. 68. Whiteside, S. T., J.-C. Epinat, N. R. Rice, and A. Israel. 1997. IB epsilon, a novel member of the IB family, controls RelA and c-Rel NF-B activity. EMBO J. 16:1413–1426. 69. Whiteside, S. T., M. K. Ernst, O. Lebail, C. Laurentwinter, N. Rice, and A. Israel. 1995. N-terminal and C-terminal sequences control degradation of Mad3/IB␣ in response to inducers of NF-B activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 5339–5345. 70. Winston, J. T., P. Strack, P. Beer-Romero, C. Y. Chu, S. J. Elledge, and J. W. Harper. 1999. The SCF -TRCP-ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in IB␣ and -catenin and stimulates IB␣ ubiquitination in vitro. Genes Dev. 13:270–283. 71. Woronicz, J. D., X. Gao, Z. Cao, M. Rothe, and D. V. Goeddel. 1997. IB kinase-beta: NF-B activation and complex formation with IB kinase-alpha and NIK. Science 278:866–869. 72. Xu, R. M., L. Jokhan, X. Cheng, A. Mayeda, and A. R. Krainer. 1997. Crystal structure of human UP1, the domain of hnRNPA1 that contains two RNArecognition motifs. Structure 5:559–570. 73. Yang, X., M. R. Bani, S. J. Lu, S. Rowan, Y. Ben-David, and B. Chabot. 1994. The A1 and A1B proteins of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoparticles modulate 5⬘ splice site selection in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6924– 6928. 74. Yaron, A., A. Hatzubai, M. Davis, I. Lavon, S. Amit, A. M. Manning, J. S. Andersen, M. Mann, F. Mercurio, and Y. Ben-Neriah. 1998. Identification of the receptor component of the IB␣-ubiquitin ligase. Nature 396:590–594. 75. Zandi, E., D. M. Rothwarf, M. Delhase, M. Hayakawa, and M. Karin. 1997. The IB kinase complex (IKK) contains two kinase subunits, IKK alpha and IKK beta, necessary for IB phosphorylation and NF-B activation. Cell 91:243–252.
