Investigations of Spectroscopic Factors and Sum Rules from the ...

5 downloads 196 Views 389KB Size Report
oratory in Garching, Germany. The reaction ejectiles were momentum analyzed using a Q3D spectrograph, and 130 levels have been identified up to 4.2 MeV of ...
EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 02056 (2014) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/ 20146602056  C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2014

Investigations of Spectroscopic Factors and Sum Rules from the Single Neutron Transfer Reaction 111 Cd(~d,p)112 Cd D.S. Jamieson1 , a , P.E. Garrett1 , G.C. Ball2 , G.A. Demand1 , T. Faestermann3 , P. Finlay1 , K.L. Green1 , R. Hertenberger4 , R. Krücken3 , K.G. Leach1 , A.A. Phillips1 , C.S. Sumithrarachchi1 , S. Triambak1 , and H.-F. Wirth4 1

Department of Physics, University of Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A3, Canada 3 Physik Department, Technische Universitat München, D-85748 Garching, Germany 4 Fakulat für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, D-85748m Garching, Germany 2

Abstract. Cadmium isotopes have been presented for decades as excellent examples of vibrational nuclei, with low-lying levels interpreted as multi-phonon quadrupole, octupole, and mixed-symmetry states. A large amount of spectroscopic data has been obtained through various experimental studies of cadmium isotopes. In the present work, the 111 Cd(~d,p)112 Cd reaction was used to investigate the single-particle structure of the 112 Cd nucleus. A 22 MeV beam of polarized deuterons was obtained at the Maier-Leibnitz laboratory in Garching, Germany. The reaction ejectiles were momentum analyzed using a Q3D spectrograph, and 130 levels have been identified up to 4.2 MeV of excitation energy. Using DWBA analysis with optical model calculations, spin-parity assignments have been made for observed levels, and spectroscopic factors have been extracted from the experimental angular distributions of differential cross section and analyzing power. In this high energy resolution investigation, many additional levels have been observed compared with the previous (d,p) study using 8 MeV deuterons [1]. There were a total of 44 new levels observed, and the parity assignments of 34 levels were improved.

1 Introduction The energy spacings and spin-parity values of low-lying levels in the cadmium isotopes have a compelling similarity to the spectrum of a spherical harmonic vibrational system. Vibrational nuclear structure involves highly collective modes of excitation, where a 1-phonon state is a superposition over many two quasi-particle states near the Fermi surface. Quadrupole and octupole single-phonon and multi-phonon states have been proposed in the cadmium isotopes, as well as coupled quadrupoleoctupole states. The 111 Cd(~d,p)112 Cd single neutron transfer reaction probes the single-particle components of states in 112 Cd, which provides a good test of the assignments made for phonon states within 112 Cd. The vibrational interpretation of excited states in 112 Cd must be consistent with the distribution of single-particle transfer strength among the excited states. A highly collective state, such a multi-phonon excitation, should be weakly populated in a single nucleon transfer. a e-mail: [email protected]

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article available at http://www.epj-conferences.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20146602056

Differential cross section (mb/str)

EPJ Web of Conferences

Bojowald et. al (1988) Daehnick, Childs, and Vrcelj (1980) An and Cai (2006) Han, Shi, and Shen (2006)

1000

1

Analyzing powers

0.6 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10

20

30

40 50 60 70 80 90 Centre-of-mass angle (degrees)

100 110 120 130

0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0

100 110 120

Figure 1: Elastic scattering angular distributions of differential cross section and analyzing power from polarized deuterons on 111 Cd, with DWBA calculations from global optical model potentials [2, 3, 6, 7].

2 Spectroscopic factors and sum rules ~ p)112 Cd single-neutron transfer experiment was conducted at the Maier-Leibniz LabA 111 Cd(d, oratory in Germany using an MP tandem Van de Graaff accelerator. Polarized deuterons from Stern-Gerlach ion source were accelerated to 22 MeV, and 80% polarization was achieved. The deuterons impinged on a 111 Cd target with a thickness of 150 µg·cm−2 . Outgoing protons were detected using the Q3D magnetic spectrometer. Spectra were collected from angles ranging from 10◦ to 60◦ in increments of 5◦ . Polarized deuteron elastic scattering data were also collected for 111 Cd between angles of 15◦ and 115◦ in 5◦ increments. The angular distributions from the elastic scattering of deuterons on the 111 Cd is shown in Figure (1), along with several DWBA calculations using standard global optical model potentials. The deuteron elastic scattering data were used to fix which global optical parameters to use in the DWBA analysis of the transfer data. A sample spectrum from the transfer data is shown in Fig. (2). The potential from reference [3] was chosen. Proton optical model parameters from reference [4] were chosen on the basis of elastic scattering data of protons on 112 Cd from the EXFOR database. The proton elastic scattering data was originally published in reference [5]. Adiabatic Distorted Wave Approximation (ADWA) calculations were also used. Both calculations are shown with sample experimental angular distributions of Fig. (3). The DWBA and ADWA calculations were performed using the code FRESCO [8].

02056-p.2

INPC 2013 4000

617, 2

+

+

2301, 0 2373, 5

3500

2 + 2122,

500 0 2818, 6 2373, 5

5000

-

3108, 0

2156, 2

-

2005, 3 + 2082, 4

+

1312, 2

1000

+

1224, 0

+

1500

+

1871, 0

+

2231, 2

2000 1433.2, 0 + 1469, 2

Counts

2500

+

GS, 0

+

3000

+

-

-

-

4112, 5,6

-

3888, 5

3781, 1,2

+

+

3704, 1

3432, 2,3 + 3480, 2 + 3557, 1 + 3612, 2

+

3179, 2 +

3231, 1 + 3301, 1 + 3342, 2

+

3067, 0,1

+

+

2899, 5 -

2962, 4

-

2506, 2

+

2231, 2

2082, 4 + 2122, 2 + 2156, 2

+

2005, 3

1000

-

2000

2570, 5 + 2635, 2 + 2674, 2 + 2724, 2 + 2766, 2

+

3000 2301, 0

Counts

4000

0 100

200

300

400

500

600

Channel Number

Figure 2: Spectra of the low-lying (top) and high-lying (bottom) excitations in 112 Cd from the (d,p) transfer reaction. The spectra collected during this experimental investigation had energy resolutions of 6-7 keV. The high resolution of the data allowed us to identify 130 levels of 112 Cd. The angular distributions and analyzing powers, along with DWBA and ADWA calculations, allowed for the identification of the dominant ℓ and j involved in the transfer. Where the levels were previously observed in an (n, n′ γ) experiment [9], the spin-parity of the observed level could be verified, and in some cases made firm. The ground state of the 111 Cd target nucleus has J π = 1/2+ . There were 44 new levels observed in this experiment, and parity assignments were improved for 34 levels. Sum rules for spectroscopic factors were investigated using results from a previous study of the 111 Cd(~d, t)110 Cd reaction [10]. Our total observed ℓ = 0 strength from the (d,p) transfers was ∼ 1.4. The observed ℓ = 0 strength from the (d,t) pick-up was ∼ 1.1. According to the sum rules, the total strength from these reactions should be equal to 2 j + 1. The results differ with the sum rule by about 25%, but the two values agree well since the choice of optical potential for the DWBA analysis introduces about a 30% systematic uncertainty. Spectroscopic factors from the ADWA calculations differed from ones obtained with DWBA calculation by about 20% on average, so the dominant uncertainty is due to choice of parameters rather than choice of reaction model. The ADWA calculations generally, but with some exceptions, reproduced the transfer angular distributions better than the DWBA calculations. Most of the other ℓ transfers add to much less than the sum rule predicts. This indicates that much of the strength for these other ℓ transfers is fragmented above 4.2 MeV.

02056-p.3

EPJ Web of Conferences

[ µb sr ]

dσ dΩ

0

10

l=0 gs π + J =0

-1

10

j=1/2 Slj=0.09

-2

10

-1

10

[ µb sr ]

dσ dΩ

Ay

l=2 j=3/2 2122 π + Slj=0.02 J =2

0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0.4

-1

10

Ay l=3 2962 π J =4 j=7/2 Slj=0.01

-2

10

-2

10

0.2

0

l=4 2082 π + J =4

-0.2

0.4 0.2 0

0

-2

10

j=7/2 Slj=0.01

-0.2 l=2 2724 π + J =2

-1

10

0 j=5/2 Slj=0.04

-2

-1

10

l=5 j=11/2 2373 π - Slj=0.4 J =5

-0.2 -0.4 0.2 0

-0.2 -0.2

10

10 20 30 40 50 60

10 20 30 40 50 60

10 20 30 40 50 60

10 20 30 40 50 60

Figure 3: 111 Cd(~d,p)112 Cd angular distributions and analyzing powers with calculations from the FRESCO code. The red curves are ADWA and the blue curves are DWBA calculations. Both curves have been scaled to the experimental data, and the scaling factor (Sℓ j ), is the spectroscopic factor.

3 Summary and outlook Spectroscopic factors have been obtained for 130 populated levels in 112 Cd from the (d,p) transfer reaction. Angular distributions of cross sections and analyzing powers from the experiment are well reproduced by the DWBA and ADWA calculations using global OMPs. Spin-parities have been assigned to each observed level. The standard interpretation of 112 Cd as a vibrational nucleus will be reassessed in light of the new spectroscopic data from this experiment, including the distribution of single-particle strength for the transfer.

References [1] P. D. Barnes, J. R. Comfort, and C.K. Bockelman, Phys. Rev. 155, 1319, (1967). [2] J. Bojowald et al., Phys. Rev. C 38, 1153 (1988). [3] W.W. Daehnick, J.D. Childs, and Z. Vrcelj, Phys. Rev. C 21, 2253, (1980). [4] A.J. Koning and J.P. Delaroche, Nuc. Phys. A 713, 231, (2003). [5] R.M. Petit et. al., J. Phys. G 20, 1955, (1994). [6] Haixia An and Chonghai Cai, Phys. Rev. C 73, 054605 (2006). [7] Y. Han, Y. Shi, and Q. Shen, Phys. Rev. C 74, 044615 (2006). [8] I.J. Thompson, Comp. Phys. Rep. 7, 167, (1988). [9] P.E. Garrett et al., Phys Rev. C 64, 024316, (2001). [10] N. Blasi et al., Nuc. Phys. A 536, 1, (1992).

02056-p.4