Nov 21, 2008 - aConsultant Mel Mason and Associates Enterprise, 478 Marmion Street, ..... and Hobbs (1973), Singh and Yusuf (1979), and Sheppard and ...
This article was downloaded by: [Department of Agriculture & Food], [Mr R. F. Brennan] On: 17 September 2013, At: 23:53 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Plant Nutrition Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lpla20
Comparison of growth response and nitrogen uptake by canola and wheat following application of nitrogen fertilizer a
M. G. Mason & R. F. Brennan
b
a
Consultant Mel Mason and Associates Enterprise, 478 Marmion Street, Myaree, Western Australia, 6154, Australia b
Albany Regional Office, Agriculture Western Australia, Albany, Western Australia, 6330, Australia Published online: 21 Nov 2008.
To cite this article: M. G. Mason & R. F. Brennan (1998) Comparison of growth response and nitrogen uptake by canola and wheat following application of nitrogen fertilizer, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21:7, 1483-1499 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365497
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor
Downloaded by [Department of Agriculture & Food], [Mr R. F. Brennan] at 23:53 17 September 2013
& Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-andconditions
Downloaded by [Department of Agriculture & Food], [Mr R. F. Brennan] at 23:53 17 September 2013
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 21(7), 1483-1499 (1998)
Comparison of Growth Response and Nitrogen Uptake by Canola and Wheat Following Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer M. G. Masona and R. F. Brennanb,1 a
Consultant Mel Mason and Associates Enterprise, 478 Marmion Street, Myaree, Western Australia 6154, Australia b Agriculture Western Australia, Albany Regional Office, Albany, Western Australia 6330, Australia
ABSTRACT The seed yield response of canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to application of nitrogen (N), applied as urea (46% N), was measured in two field experiments in south Western Australia. Wheat produced significantly more seed than canola at all levels of applied N fertilizer, including the no-N control. There was a small (
