Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA-ProSeal)

11 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM (LMA-ProSealTM; Laryngeal Mask Company Limited) is a reusable .... an airway obstruction at laryngeal inlet could.
Case Report

Brunei Int Med J. 2012; 8 (4): 205-209

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA-ProSeal) malfunction causing acute airway obstruction Binu Puthur SIMON and Syed Harun HABIBULLAH Department of Anaesthesiology, RIPAS Hospital, Brunei Darussalam

ABSTRACT The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM (LMA-ProSealTM; Laryngeal Mask Company Limited) is a reusable supraglottic airway device developed to enhance supraglottic airway protection and extend the benefits of the classic LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) to greater number of patients. Added features include an additional drain tube to channel fluid away from the airway and a tighter seal against the glottic opening with no increase in mucosal pressure. Clinicians have extended the use of the LMA-ProSealTM inside and outside the operating theatre including use for difficult airway management and airway rescue. However, even these new devices have their limitations. We report an unforeseen acute airway obstruction caused by LMA-ProSealTM malfunction during ophthalmic surgery. The cuff of the device was deformed with herniation to one side upon insufflation of the balloon.

Keywords: Laryngeal mask airway, malfunction, complications, LMA-ProSeal

INTRODUCTION Laryngeal masks are used broadly for elective

8

and emergency airway management and are

gal nerve stimulator.

an essential part of the American and Europe-

where an unanticipated airway problem arose

1-3

due to a defect in a reusable Laryngeal Mask

Due to their wide use, noticeable complica-

Airway ProSealTM (LMA-ProSealTM) when it was

tions and side effects have been reported

used for an ophthalmic procedure. Upon care-

over the last years. The rare reports of airway

ful investigation post procedure, the inflatable

obstruction directly triggered by the laryngeal

part of the device had weakened and bal-

mask are swelling of the pharyngeal soft tis-

looned out causing deformation of the mask

sues caused by the leakage of irrigation fluid,

resulting in loss of proper fit and seal.

an difficult airway management algorithm.

4

and intermittent obstruction related to a va9

We report the case

herniation of the laryngeal mask airway

cuff,

5-7

foreign bodies (Ascaris lumbricoides),

CASE REPORT A 48-year-old man with a body mass index of

Correspondence author: Binu Puthur SIMON, Department Of Anaesthesiology RIPAS Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan BA 1710 Brunei Darussalam E mail: [email protected]

38.9 kg/m2 was scheduled for Trans Pars Plana Vitrectomy and intra-ocular lens insertion of the left eye under general anaesthesia. His

SIMON and HABIBULAH. Brunei Int Med J. 2012; 8 (4): 206

past medical history was relevant for obs–

After this adjustment, the peak airway pres-

tructive sleep apnoea, hypertension and dia-

sure went up to 29-30cm of H2O and the

betes mellitus.

mean airway pressure was around 17cm of H2O. The end tidal CO2 was maintained at 48

The patient was pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen for three minutes and general

to 50mm of Hg. We managed to continue with this strategy for another 40 minutes.

anaesthesia was induced with 200mgs of propofol and 75mcgs of fentanyl. Anaesthesia

Approximately 10 to 15 minutes be-

was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide

fore completion of surgery, breathing at-

and isoflurane. Mask ventilation was fairly

tempts by the patient were noted and we at-

easy and intravenous atracurium (40mg) was

tempted to manage the patient on spontane-

given for relaxation. A size 4 cuff LMA-

ous ventilation mode with manual assistance.

TM

ProSeal

laryngeal mask airway was suc-

It was noticed that at this point there was

cessfully placed after checking of the cuff with

hardly any end tidal CO2 trace and the reser-

30ml air insufflation. The cuff was inflated

voir bag did not show any movement. The

with 20ml of air. The patient was ventilated

patient seemed to be experiencing acute air-

with pressure controlled ventilation (PCV)

way obstruction during spontaneous attempts

mode with following parameters; inspiratory

of breathing. The patient was paralysed with a

pressure of 15cm H2O, respiratory rate of 12

10mg dose of atracurium. Volume control

per minute and an inspiratory: expiratory

mode was reinstated with the same settings

(I:E) ratio of 1:1. An I:E ratio of 1:1 was pre-

as before. The patient was then satisfactorily

ferred to achieve a higher tidal volume at a

ventilated until the surgical procedure was

lower pre-set inspiratory pressure (normal

completed.

ratio is 1:2). The patient could generate around 550mls of tidal volume with the above

An intravenous dose of neostigmine

settings. As a precautionary measure, a size

and atropine were then administered to re-

12 nasogastric tube was introduced through

verse the residual effect of the muscle relax-

the drain tube of the laryngeal mask airway

ants. When breathing attempts commenced,

(LMA). His end tidal CO2 was 35-40mm of Hg

the patient appeared to be further exhibit air-

(Normal range 35 to 45mm of Hg).

way obstruction. At this point the LMAProSealTM was removed and a Guedel airway

Thirty minutes into the surgery a

(size 4) was inserted. The patient was venti-

gradual decrease in tidal volume (350ml) and

lated with a face mask until a good respirato-

a rise in the end tidal CO2 were noted. An ad-

ry effort was observed. Further recovery was

ditional dose of atracurium (40mg) and fenta-

uneventful. The LMA-ProSealTM was later ex-

nyl (75mcgs) were given on the assumption

amined and it was noted that the cuff was

that the effect of the initial dose was wearing

deformed with herniation to one side (Figure

off, but there was no improvement. Then the

1). A faulty LMA with herniation after insuffla-

ventilator mode was changed to volume con-

tions, together with formation of a fold on the

trol with the following setting; tidal volume of

cuff was suspected as the cause of the airway

500ml and respiratory rate of 12/minute.

problem we had encountered in this case.

SIMON and HABIBULAH. Brunei Int Med J. 2012; 8 (4): 207

Figures 1: a) Inflated ProSeal

TM

showing

herniation of the right side (arrow) and b) View from the other side showing the

a

b

herniation resulting in deformation and loss of seal contour.

DISCUSSION Cases of herniation have been reported with

With intermittent positive pressure

the Classic LMA™ airway. There was a case

ventilation (IPPV) and adjustment to volume

where the plastic layers between the inflated

control we succeeded in ventilating the pa-

cuffs of a disposable LMATM had separated and

tient adequately. Since a constant flow of gas

resulted in a herniation

10

and, another case

is delivered in the volume control mode, more

where the classic reusable LMA had herniated,

tidal volume was achieved with the same air-

probably as a result of material fatigue follow-

way pressure, unlike the decelerating flow

ing repeated sterilisation.

7

noticed in pressure control mode. Moreover an airway obstruction at laryngeal inlet could

In this case, we suspected herniation

generate an auto positive end expiratory

(deformation) of the LMA occurred intra-

pressure (PEEP). This intrinsic PEEP together

operatively causing leakage around the LMA-

with long inspiratory time places the patient

ProSeal

TM

. A fold formed on the cuff facing

the laryngeal inlet (Figure 1 b). The defor-

on a less compliant (over distended) part of the volume pressure curve.

mation led to loss of proper seal causing the subsequent events.

When the patient started breathing spontaneously the obstruction became more

Though we were successful in venti-

severe causing inadequate ventilation. The

lating the patient using the volume control

reasons for almost complete airway obstruc-

mode, the peak airway pressures were high

tion once spontaneous breathing commenced

(30cm of H2O) despite administering a repeat

could be due to the deformed cuff displacing

dose of muscle relaxant. Initially we were

the LMA inlet away from the glottis. This ef-

able to get the same tidal volume at a setting

fect possibly got worse with the negative

of 15 cm H2O with pressure control mode.

pressure caused by spontaneous inspiratory

SIMON and HABIBULAH. Brunei Int Med J. 2012; 8 (4): 208

efforts. In this particular case, LMA-ProSealTM

followed in LMA–Pro SealTM prior to insertion.

was preferred over the endotracheal tube to In

obtain smooth recovery and avoid the stress of extubation occurring after posterior cham11

TM

problem

conclusion, is

when

encountered

with

a

ventilation a

reusable

was used

LMA™, particularly if this had experienced

precautionary

repeated sterilisation, a herniated cuff should

measures against aspiration and gastric dis-

be considered, even if initial testing was in-

tension (like insertion of an orogastric tube).

conspicuous.

Additionally, LMA ProSeal has proven to have

LMA™ and inspection of the cuff should be

ber eye surgery. as

we

could

LMA-ProSeal

take

extra

better seal at higher ventilating pressures.

12

7

Removal of the malfunctioning

considered to rule out this potentially deleterious technical problem.

There have been case reports of herniation of the classic reusable type LMA, pos-

AKNOWLEDGEMENT: We would like to acknow-

sibly as a result of overuse, over inflation or

ledge our colleagues, Dr Salil G NAIR, Dr Anand H

repeated sterilisation.

13

Repeated uses of

KULKARNI and Dr Hj Zulaidi HJ ABDUL LATIF for their help with the management of this patient.

LMA™ airways beyond 40 uses increases the probability of device malfunctions.

15

In this

particular case we were unable to determine

REFERENCES

how often the LMA-ProSealTM had been sub-

1: Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal

jected to repeated use. As a standard practice we utilise a cuff volume of 20-30 ml for LMAProSealTM size 3 in accordance with manufac-

mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005; 52:739-60. 2: Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American

turer recommendations and, our sterilisation

Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Manage-

complies with manufacturer instructions.

ment of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1269–77.

Since the head was draped and cov-

3: Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC.

ered for our case, we did not have access to

Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management

the airway such that, in the worst case scenario of

total airway obstruction we would

have been left with no choice but to stop the

of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59:675–94. 4: Yoshimura E, Yano T, Ichinose K, Ushijima K. Airway obstruction involving a laryngeal mask air-

surgery and replace the faulty LMA with an

way during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. J Anesth

oral endotracheal tube.

2005; 19:325–7. 5: Solaidhanasekaran S, Bharamgoudar M. Airway

Cuff herniation of the LMA-Classic may not be apparent if the cuff is inflated with volume less than the recommended maximal volume (e.g., 30 ml for size 4) and may only become apparent when inflated with a volume of air 50% greater (45 ml).

15

This

obstruction secondary to herniation of the paediatric

laryngeal

mask

airway.

Anaesthesia

2008;

63:785–6. 6: Christelis ND, Doolan GK. Complete airway obstruction caused by cuff herniation of an overused laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36:274–5.

practice is now recommended by the manu-

7: Wrobel M, Ziegeler S, Grundmann U. Airway

facturer. We recommend this practice to be

obstruction due to cuff herniation of a classic reusa-

SIMON and HABIBULAH. Brunei Int Med J. 2012; 8 (4): 209

ble laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2007;

endotracheal tube: ease of insertion, hemodynamic

106:1255–6.

responses and emergence characteristics. Anesthe-

8: Roy K, Kundra P, Ravishankar M. Unusual for-

siology 2003; 99: A571.

eign body airway obstruction after laryngeal mask

13: Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and

airway insertion. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:294–5.

oropharyngeal

9: Bernards CM. An unusual cause of airway ob-

Seal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized

struction during general anesthesia with a laryngeal

paralysed patients. Brit J Anaesthesia 2000; 8:262

mask airway. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1017–8.

–6.

10: England AJ. Respiratory obstruction secondary

14: Overuse and failure to track number of uses of

to

LMATM

laryngeal

mask

failure.

Anaesthesia

2004;

leak

airways.

pressure

Available

with

from:

the Pro

http://

59:1030-1.

www.lmana.com/files/section3-overuse-and-failure

11: Brimacombe J. The ProSeal laryngeal mask

-to-track-lma-424.pdf

airway. Anesthesiol Clinics North Am. 2002; 20:871

2011).

–91.

15: Asai T, Koga K, Morris S. Damage to the laryn-

(Accessed

15th

October

12: El-Ganzouri A, Avramov MN, Budac S, Moric M,

geal mask by residual fluid in the cuff. Anaesthesia

Tuman KJ. Pro Seal Laryngeal mask airway versus

1997; 52:977–81.

Brunei Darussalam — Healthcare in Pictures

Hj Ahmed Yunos Bin Hassan (Dresser) doing his daily round with his team in the surgical ward of the Brunei General Hospital. (Picture courtesy of Dayangku Dr Siti Nur’Ashikin Bte Pengiran Tengah).