Lettuce and Spinach

26 downloads 16 Views 3MB Size Report
May 12, 2014 - Bakersfield in the west side of the San Joaquin Valley of California ... tion occurs in the low deserts of California (Coachella, Imperial, and Palo ...

Published May 12, 2014

4 Lettuce and Spinach Ivan Simko, Ryan J. Hayes, Beiquan Mou, and James D. McCreight* A bs t rac t

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) are cultivated in many countries around the world. Their production in the United States is concentrated mostly in California and Arizona, where they are grown year-round. U.S. lettuce products are categorized into three market uses: whole heads, bulk harvest (for salad processing, food service, or value-added products), and “baby leaf” or “spring mix.” The three main lettuce types produced in the United States are iceberg  (L. sativa L. var. capitata L.), romaine (L. sativa L. var. longifolia L.), and leaf (L. sativa var. crispa L.). Iceberg yield increased 183% from 1950 to 2012, romaine yield increased 12% from 1992 to 2012, and leaf yield increased 14% from 1992 to 2012. Comparative yield trials of old and modern lettuce cultivars have not been done. Yield components were identified for each market use. Spinach market uses are fresh, which may be bunched, bagged [with small (baby) or intermediate sized leaves], or blended into spring mix, and processed (frozen or canned). Spinach yield varies with locations and seasons, but gains in yield have largely been attributed to the development of hybrid cultivars that exhibit heterosis. Fresh market spinach yield in California increased 50% from 1961 to 2011. Increased lettuce and spinach yield due to changes in agronomic practices (e.g., wide beds and high plant density) and more uniform and disease- and pest-resistant cultivars are offset to some extent by shifts in market uses (e.g., reduced proportion of the head harvested for romaine lettuce hearts) and early harvest for baby leaf lettuce and spinach. Sustained and increased lettuce and spinach yield depend on further optimized agronomic practices and productive cultivars with desirable quality, uniformity, and disease and pest resistance that are adaptable to variable environmental conditions and have increased water and nitrogen use efficiency.

Abbreviations: DPP, days post-planting; LIYV, Lettuce infectious yellows virus; QTL, quantitative trait locus; SPWF; Sweet potato whitefly. I. Simko ([email protected]), R.J. Hayes ([email protected]), B. Mou (beiquan. [email protected]), and J.D. McCreight, USDA-ARS, Crop Improvement and Protection Research Unit, 1636 E. Alisal St., Salinas, CA 93905. *Corresponding author ([email protected]). The authors contributed equally to this review. doi:10.2135/cssaspecpub33.c4 Yield Gains in Major U.S. Field Crops. CSSA Special Publication 33. Stephen Smith, Brian Diers, James Specht, and Brett Carver, editors. © 2014. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison, WI 53711-5801, USA.

53

54

Simko, Hayes, Mou & McCreight

Cultivated lettuce

is a self-fertilizing diploid species (2n = 2x = 18) from the Compositae family. Lettuce is the most popular, commercially produced leafy vegetable and is cultivated mainly in moderate climates in many countries around the world. Over 79% of the world production that totaled 24.3 million tonnes in 2011 (FAOSTAT, 2013) originated from four countries: China, with 55.2% of the total production (by weight), the United States (16.0%), India (4.4%), and Spain (3.6%). Lettuce cultivars are divided into eight horticultural types on the basis of the shape and size of the head; the shape, size, and texture of leaves; stem length; and seed size (Fig. 4–1). The leaves of crisphead (which includes two subtypes, iceberg and Batavia), romaine, butterhead, leaf, and Latin types are typically eaten

Fig. 4–1. Lettuce types frequently grown in the United States: (top row, left) iceberg; (top row, right) Batavia; (second row, left) romaine; (second row, right) speckled romaine; (third row, left) green leaf; (third row, right) red leaf; (bottom row, left) red leaf; and (bottom row, right) butterhead.

Lettuce and Spinach

55

fresh. The stem type is cultivated mainly for edible stems, fresh or cooked. The oil type is used for cooking oil from its relatively large seeds. There are no modern cultivars of the stem or oilseed types commercially grown in the United States. Detailed descriptions of each lettuce type were provided by Rodenburg (1960) and Ryder (1999) and are only summarized here. Crisphead cultivars are known for their thick, crisp leaves that cup and form a spherical head weighing approximately 0.8 to 1 kg (1.8–2.2 lb). Butterhead cultivars produce spherical heads that weigh approximately 0.2 to 0.4 kg (0.44–0.88 lb); the leaves of this type are known for their pliability and oily texture. Romaine cultivars exhibit leaves that are much longer than wide and are typically upright to form an elongated head. Heads of commercially produced romaine weigh approximately 0.75 kg (1.65 lb). The top of the romaine head may or may not close over the inner leaves. Latin types produced quite small heads, less than 0.3 kg (5%. Lettuce processed into salad requires even higher stringencies. Tipburn occurs during a narrow period of time immediately preceding harvest. The occurrence of tipburn is correlated with environmental conditions that either decrease transpiration from the leaf surface or promote rapid growth, both of which impair the plants ability to supply sufficient calcium to growing tissues, which then results in tipburn (Barta and Tibbitts, 2000; Thibodeau and Minotti, 1969). These conditions include low air movement (Goto and Takakura, 1992), artificial or natural enclosure of the leaves (Barta and Tibbitts, 1986), high relative humidity during the daytime (Collier and Tibbitts, 1982), high temperatures (Cox et al., 1976; Misaghi and Grogan, 1978; Yanagi et al., 1983), high radiation levels (Tibbitts and Rao, 1968), long photoperiods (Koontz and Prince, 1986), and high fertilization levels. Growers cannot control all of the environmental factors involved in tipburn, and breeding for tipburn resistance is the best long-term solution. Most breeding for tipburn resistance is conducted by selective culling of plants, families, and lines with symptoms. Using this approach, iceberg lettuce cultivars have been bred with levels of resistance that are adequate for most planting slots (Ryder and Waycott, 1998), although no cultivars are completely resistant (Nagata and Stratton, 1994). Genetic improvements for tipburn resistance are needed most in the romaine gene pool (Jenni and Hayes, 2010). Screening cultivars, breeding lines, and segregating families for tipburn resistance can be performed in the field or in controlled environments, but the results are not always consistent (Cox et al., 1976; Nagata and Stratton, 1994). Tipburn incidence is subject to genotype ´ environment interaction (Jenni and Hayes, 2010), and extensive field testing is needed to fully characterize resistance in cultivars or breeding lines. Little is known regarding the genetics of tipburn resistance. While cultivars exhibited extensive genetic variation for the incidence of the disorder, plant architecture is a major factor influencing the prevalence of the disorder, with open top and slower maturing cultivars expressing lower tipburn incidence (Jenni and Hayes, 2010). The dependence of tipburn incidence on plant architecture makes comparison of resistance across market types virtually impossible. Resistance genes that are independent of morphology are most valuable, as they could improve resistance in all market types. The high level of resistance in iceberg cultivars such as Salinas (Ryder, 1979b) and Tiber (Ryder and Waycott, 1998) have been proposed as sources of resistance to breed resistance in other types (Jenni

Lettuce and Spinach

79

and Hayes, 2010). Six QTLs for tipburn resistance were discovered in two intraspecific recombinant inbred line populations tested in Arizona, and four of the loci cosegregated with head closure, core height, or head maturity (Hayes and Simko, 2010). Global climate change may affect agriculture more through its impact on water availability than on temperature. All lettuce and spinach production in California and Arizona are surface irrigated, but future water availability for growers is expected to decrease. Water is a precious resource and has become increasingly scarce because of population growth, environmental needs, and frequent drought. Climate change has resulted in less predictable precipitation, less snow pack, and earlier snowmelt, leading to periods of water shortages in California (Weare, 2009). Court orders limit the pumping of Northern California water to farms in San Joaquin Valley, severely restricting the leafy vegetable production. Coastal Monterey County faces water shortage and seawater intrusion and has planned the construction of several desalination plants for residential uses. Conversely, ever tighter regulations on farm runoffs call for crop varieties with reduced irrigation requirement and better water use efficiency (WUE). Cultivars with improved WUE will tolerate water deficit stress to the degree that product quality and yield are maintained, significantly reducing growers’ irrigation costs. As the costs of land, labor, fuel, fertilizer, pesticides, seeds, packing material, cooling, transportation, and overhead including food safety continue to rise, it is essential to reduce production costs of leafy vegetables to benefit producers as well as consumers. With the limited water supply, decreases in crop water requirements could result in proportional increases in lettuce and spinach production area. In addition to the conservation of water resources, the decreased irrigation needs of drought-tolerant lettuce and spinach may reduce farm runoff and pesticides leaching into groundwater, helping growers with regulatory compliance and alleviating the pressure on the environment. Research to increase yield in production systems that use limited irrigation is a priority for lettuce breeding but is still in its infancy. Cultivated lettuce is reliant on frequent irrigation and high input of nutrients because of its short taproot and prolific lateral branches in the upper layers of the soil (Jackson, 1995). Contrary to cultivated lettuce, L. serriola, its wild progenitor, develops a long taproot and relies on water from deep soil zones during periods of surface soil drought (Jackson, 1995). The wild L. serriola is, therefore, a potential source of agriculturally important alleles to optimize water and fertilizer use efficiency (Johnson et al., 2000) when integrated with improved irrigation and fertilizer practices. A single QTL was identified in an L. sativa ´ L. serriola population controlling increased taproot length per gram of plant biomass. This QTL was independent of QTL for shoot biomass and the percentage of biomass allocated to roots (Johnson et al., 2000). These results suggest that breeding for a reallocation of root biomass may develop cultivars that can access nutrients from deeper soil depths. Selection for increased root biomass may not be advantageous, as gains are likely to come at the expense of shoot growth and therefore yield (Johnson et al., 2000). Weed problems will become more prominent with global warming, as weeds are expected to adapt to the changing environment better than crops (Clements and DiTommaso, 2012). Weeds in leafy vegetables increase production costs and reduce yields and quality. Weed cover of 25% reduces lettuce yield by 20 to 40%,

80

Simko, Hayes, Mou & McCreight

and >25% weed cover may cause complete yield loss. Baby lettuce, a primary component of spring mix, and spinach have zero tolerance for weed contamination, yet high plant densities prevent mechanical cultivation. Herbicides are essential for profitability, but few herbicides are registered for lettuce and spinach in California, and they are subject to cancellation by manufacturers because of their relatively small acreage and low sales volumes, marginal profitability, and high regulatory costs. The lettuce industry has depended on pronamide (Kerb) as the major herbicide. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency stopped the use of Kerb on leaf lettuce in 2009 because of crop group reclassifications. There is no certainty that Kerb will be reregistered on leaf lettuce, as the herbicide has been classified as a B2 carcinogen and found to leach into groundwater in Virginia (Bruggeman et al., 1995). Herbicide producer Helm Agro suspended in 2008 to 2009 the production of RoNeet, the primary herbicide for spinach. Bayer Co. recently stopped production of Spin-Aid, an herbicide for processing spinach. The prospect of losing effective herbicides is a constant threat for California leafy greens industry. A decade of searching for new lettuce and spinach herbicides has failed, as the crops are very sensitive to herbicide damage. Kerb does not effectively control some weeds, for example, sowthistle (Sonchus spp.) and groundsel (Senecio spp.), and there is no postemergence broadleaf herbicide available for these crops. The loss of Kerb or RoNeet with no adequate herbicide replacement may have a considerable adverse effect on the industry. The loss of Kerb for leaf lettuce has significantly increased production costs by >US$371 per hectare (>US$150 per acre) because of hand weeding (Haar and Fennimore, 2003). Increased hand weeding costs often mark the difference between profit and loss for leafy greens producers. A simple, reliable, and sustainable weed management system might be developed through the use of herbicide-tolerant lettuce and spinach cultivars. A herbicide-tolerant crop is an attractive option, since a broad-spectrum herbicide can remove weeds without injuring the tolerant crop. Herbicide tolerance is a proven approach to weed control as 73% of corn (Zea mays L.), 93% of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and 80% of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops in the United States were planted with herbicide-tolerant varieties in 2012 (USDA-ERS, 2012). No transgenes are currently used in lettuce and spinach production. On the basis of feedback from the industry, lettuce and spinach cultivars developed by conventional breeding, the same method used successfully in the creation of herbicide-tolerant sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), will be more easily and widely accepted by growers, the industry, and consumers than transgenic crops. Such a breeding program for herbicide-tolerant lettuce and spinach is currently underway in our project by screening mutants in these crops (Fennimore et al., 2012). This project may provide efficient and much more effective weed control tools than growers have now and improve the profitability and sustainability of lettuce and spinach production.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank K. Nolte for providing photographs of lettuce and spinach production in Arizona, K.V. Subbarao for the figure of the lettuce production areas, and A. Atallah for help with editing figures and the revised version of the manuscript.

Lettuce and Spinach

81

References

Argyris, J., P. Dahal, E. Hayashi, D.W. Still, and K.J. Bradford. 2008. Genetic variation for lettuce seed thermoinhibition is associated with temperature-sensitive expression of abscisic acid, gibberellin, and ethylene biosynthesis, metabolism, and response genes. Plant Physiol. 148:926–947. doi:10.1104/pp.108.125807 Argyris, J., M.J. Truco, O. Ochoa, S.J. Knapp, D.W. Still, G.M. Lenssen, J.W. Schut, R.W. Michelmore, and K.J. Bradford. 2005. Quantitative trait loci associated with seed and seedling traits in Lactuca. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111:1365–1376. doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0066-4 Bakker, M.I., W.J. Baas, D.T.H.M. Sijm, and C. Kollöffel. 1998. Leaf wax of Lactuca Sativa and Plantago major. Phytochemistry 47:1489–1493. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(97)01084-4 Barrons, K.C., and T.W. Whitaker. 1943. Great Lakes, a new summer head lettuce adapted to summer conditions. Mich. Agric. Exp. Stn. 25:1–3. Barta, D.J., and T.W. Tibbitts. 1986. Effects of artificial enclosure of young lettuce leaves on tipburn incidence and leaf calcium concentration. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111:413–416. Barta, D.J., and T.W. Tibbitts. 2000. Calcium localization and tipburn development in lettuce leaves during early enlargement. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125:294–298. Bradley, G.A., W.A. Sistrunk, E.C. Baker, and J.N. Cash. 1975. Effect of plant spacing, nitrogen, and cultivar on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) yield and quality. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 100:45–48. Bragdø, M. 1962. Breeding of polyploidy spinach. Euphytica 11:143–148. doi:10.1007/BF00033786 Bremer, A.H. 1931. Einfluss der tageslänge auf die wachstumsphasen des salats. Genetische Untersuchungen I. Gartenbauwissenschaft 4:469–483. Bremer, A.H., and J. Grana. 1935. Genetische Untersuchungen mit Salat II. Gartenbauwissenschaft 9:231–245. Brown, P.R., and R.W. Michelmore. 1988. The genetics of corky root resistance in lettuce. Phytopathology 78:1145–1150. doi:10.1094/Phyto-78-1145 Bruggeman, A.C., S. Mostaghimi, G.I. Holtzman, V.O. Shanholtz, S. Shukla, and B.B. Ross. 1995. Monitoring pesticides and nitrate in Virginia’s groundwater–a pilot study. Trans. ASAE 38:797–807. doi:10.13031/2013.27894 Bull, C.T., P.H. Goldman, R.J. Hayes, L.V. Madden, S.T. Koike, and E.J. Ryder. 2007. Genetic diversity of lettuce for resistance to bacterial leaf spot caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians. Plant Health Prog. 10.1094/PHP-2007–0917–02-RS. Cavagnaro, T., L. Jackson, and K. Scow. 2006. Climate change: Challenges and solutions for California agricultural landscapes. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA. Clements, D.R., and A. DiTommaso. 2012. Predicting weed invasion in Canada under climate change: Evaluating evolutionary potential. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92:1013–1020. doi:10.4141/ cjps2011-280 Collier, G.F., and T.W. Tibbitts. 1982. Tipburn of lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109(2):128–131. Correll, J.C., T.E. Morelock, M.C. Black, S.T. Koike, L.P. Brandenberger, and F.J. Dainello. 1994. Economically important diseases of spinach. Plant Dis. 78:653–660. doi:10.1094/PD-78-0653 County of Monterey Agricultural Commissioner. 2011. Monterey County Crop Report, County of Monterey Agricultural Commissioner. http://ag.co.monterey.ca.us/assets/resources/ assets/252/cropreport_2011.pdf (accessed 24 July 2012). Cox, E.F., J.M.T. McKee, and A.S. Dearman. 1976. The effect of growth rate on tipburn occurrence in lettuce. J. Hortic. Sci. 51:297–309. Davis, R.M., K.V. Subbarao, R.N. Raid, and E.A. Kurtz. 1997. Compendium on lettuce diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. FAOSTAT. 2010. Production. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (accessed 19 Dec. 2012). FAOSTAT. 2013. Crops data for 2011. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org (accessed 21 Feb. 2013). Fennimore, S.A., R. Smith, and B. Mou. 2012. Weed management systems for leafy greens. Annual report. California Leafy Greens Research Program, Salinas, CA. Fukuda, M., S. Matsuo, K. Kikuchi, Y. Kawazu, R. Fujiyam, and I. Honda. 2011. Isolation and functional characterization of the FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog, the LsFT gene, in lettuce. J. Plant Physiol. 168:1602–1607. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2011.02.004 Fukuda, M., S. Matsuo, K. Kikuchi, W. Mitsuhashi, T. Toyomasu, and I. Honda. 2009. The endogenous level of GA1 is upregulated by high temperature during stem elongation in lettuce through LsGA3ox1 expression. J. Plant Physiol. 166:2077–2084. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.06.003

82

Simko, Hayes, Mou & McCreight

German-Retana, S., J. Walter, and O. Le Gall. 2008. Lettuce mosaic virus: From pathogen diversity to host interactors. Mol. Plant Pathol. 9:127–136. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00451.x Goto, E., and T. Takakura. 1992. Prevention of lettuce tipburn by supplying air to inner leaves. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 35:641–645. Grube, R.C., E.J. Ryder, S.T. Koike, J.D. McCreight, and W.M. Wintermantel. 2003. Breeding for resistance to new and emerging lettuce diseases in California. In: Th.J.L. van Hintum et al., editors, Proceedings of the EUCARPIA Meeting on Leafy Vegetables Genetics and Breeding, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. 19–21 March. Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 25–30. Grube, R.C., W.M. Wintermantel, P. Hand, R. Aburomia, D.A.C. Pink, and E.J. Ryder. 2005. Genetic analysis and mapping of resistance to lettuce dieback: A soilborne disease caused by tombusviruses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:259–268. doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1825-3 Haar, M.J., and S.A. Fennimore. 2003. Evaluation of integrated practices for common purslane management in lettuce. Weed Technol. 17:229–233. doi:10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0229 :EOIPFC]2.0.CO;2 Hartman, Y., D.A.P. Hooftman, M.E. Schranz, and P.H. van Tienderen. 2012. QTL analysis reveals the genetics architecture of domestication traits in crisphead lettuce. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 10.1007/s10722–012–9937–0. Hayes, R.J., W. BoMing, and K.V. Subbarao. 2011a. A single recessive gene conferring short leaves in romaine ´ Latin type lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) crosses, and its effect on plant morphology and resistance to lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger. Plant Breed. 130:388–393. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01822.x Hayes, R.J., K. Maruthachalam, G.E. Vallad, S.J. Klosterman, I. Simko, Y. Luo, and K.V. Subbarao. 2011b. Iceberg lettuce breeding lines with resistance to Verticillium wilt caused by race 1 isolates of Verticillium dahliae. HortScience 46:501–504. Hayes, R.J., K. Maruthachalam, G.E. Vallad, S.J. Klosterman, and K.V. Subbarao. 2011c. Selection for resistance to Verticillium wilt caused by race 2 isolates of Verticillium dahliae in accessions of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). HortScience 46:201–206. Hayes, R.J., L.K. McHale, G.E. Vallad, M.J. Truco, R.W. Michelmore, S.J. Klosterman, K. Maruthachalam, and K.V. Subbarao. 2011d. The inheritance of resistance to Verticillium wilt caused by race 1 isolates of Verticillium dahliae in the lettuce cultivar La Brillante. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123:509–517. doi:10.1007/s00122-011-1603-y Hayes, R.J., E.J. Ryder, and C.T. Bull. 2008a. Notice of release of six F6:8 and one F4:5 iceberg breeding lines of lettuce germplasm with resistance to bacterial leaf spot caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vitians. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC. Hayes, R.J., E.J. Ryder, and W.M. Wintermantel. 2008b. Genetic variation for big-vein symptom expression and resistance to Mirafori lettuce big-vein virus in Lactuca virosa L., a wild relative of cultivated lettuce. Euphytica 164:493–500. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9738-x Hayes, R.J., and I. Simko. 2010. Spring harvested lettuce tipburn resistance research. Arizona Department of Agriculture. http://www.azda.gov/act/Spring_Harvested_Lettuce.pdf (accessed 13 Mar. 2013). Hayes, R.J., G.E. Vallad, Q.-M. Qin, R.C. Grube, and K.V. Subbarao. 2007. Variation for resistance to Verticillium wilt in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant Dis. 91:439–445. doi:10.1094/ PDIS-91-4-0439 Hayes, R.J., B.M. Wu, B.M. Pryor, P. Chitrampalam, and K.V. Subbarao. 2010. Assessment of resistance in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) to mycelial and ascospore infection by Sclerotinia minor Jagger and S. sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary. HortScience 45:333–341. Huo, H., P. Dahal, K. Kunusoth, C.M. McCallum, and K.J. Bradford. 2013. Expression of 9-cis-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE4 is essential for thermoinhibition of lettuce seed germination but not for seed development or stress tolerance. Plant Cell 28:884–900. Jackson, L.E. 1995. Root architecture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Plant Cell Environ. 18:885–894. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00597.x Jagger, I.C. 1940. Brown blight of lettuce. Phytopathology 30:53–64. Jenni, S. 2005. Rib discoloration: A physiological disorder induced by heat stress in crisphead lettuce. HortScience 40:2031–2035. Jenni, S., and R.J. Hayes. 2010. Genetic variation, genotype × environment interaction, and selection for tipburn resistance in lettuce in multi-environments. Euphytica 171:427–439. doi:10.1007/s10681-009-0075-5

Lettuce and Spinach

83

Johnson, W.C., L.E. Jackson, O. Ochoa, R. van Wijk, J. Peleman, D.A. St. Clair, and R.W. Michelmore. 2000. Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and Lactuca serriola, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1066–1073. doi:10.1007/s001220051581 Jones, H.A., D.M. McLean, and B.A. Perry. 1956. Breeding hybrid spinach resistant to mosaic and downy mildew. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. 68:304–308. Karl, T.R., and K.E. Trenberth. 2003. Modern global climate change. Science 302:1719–1723. doi:10.1126/science.1090228 Koike, S.T., M. Cahn, M. Cantwell, S. Fennimore, M. Lestrange, E. Natwick, R.F. Smith, and E. Takele. 2011. Spinach production in California. Publication 7212. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/VegetableCropProductioninCalifornia/7212.aspx (accessed 3 Jan. 2013). Koontz, H.V., and R.P. Prince. 1986. Effect of 16 and 24 hours daily radiation (light) on lettuce growth. HortScience 21:123–124. Lebeda, A., B. Mieslerová, I. Petrželová, P. Korbelová, and E. Česneková. 2012. Patterns of virulence variation in the interaction between Lactuca spp. and lettuce powdery mildew (Golovinomyces cichoracearum). Fungal Ecol. 5:670–682. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2012.03.005 Liu, H.Y., J.L. Sears, and B. Mou. 2009. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a new natural host of Impatiens necrotic spot virus in California. Plant Dis. 93:673. doi:10.1094/PDIS-93-6-0673C Maisonneuve, B., M.C. Chupeau, Y. Bellec, and Y. Chupeau. 1995. Sexual and somatic hybridization in the genus Lactuca. Euphytica 85:281–285. doi:10.1007/BF00023957 Matheron, M.E., J.D. McCreight, B.R. Tickes, and M. Porchas. 2005. Effect of planting date, cultivar, and stage of plant development on incidence of Fusarium wilt of lettuce in desert production fields. Plant Dis. 89:565–570. doi:10.1094/PD-89-0565 McCreight, J.D. 2008. Potential sources of genetic resistance in Lactuca spp. to the lettuce aphid, Nasanovia ribisnigri (Mosely) (Homoptera: Aphididae). HortScience 43:1355–1358. McHale, L.K., M.J. Truco, A. Kozik, T. Wroblewski, O.E. Ochoa, K.A. Lahre, S.J. Knapp, and R.W. Michelmore. 2009. The genomic architecture of disease resistance in lettuce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118:565–580. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0921-1 Mikel, M.A. 2007. Genealogy of contemporary North American lettuce. HortScience 42:489–493. Mikel, M.A. 2013. Genetic composition of contemporary proprietary U.S. lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 60:89–96. doi:10.1007/s10722-012-9818-6 Misaghi, I.J., and R.G. Grogan. 1978. Effect of temperature on tipburn development in head lettuce. Phytopathology 68:1738–1743. doi:10.1094/Phyto-68-1738 Morelock, T.E., and J.C. Correll. 2008. Spinach. In: J. Prohens and F. Nuez, editors, Handbook of plant breeding, Vegetables I, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae. Springer, New York. p. 189–218. Mou, B., S. Koike, and L. du Toit. 2008. Screening for resistance to leaf spot diseases of spinach. HortScience 43:1706–1710. Mou, B., and Y.B. Liu. 2004. Host plant resistance to leafminers in lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 129:383–388. Mou, B., K. Richardson, S. Benzen, and H.Y. Liu. 2012. Effects of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus in spinach cultivars. Plant Dis. 96:618–622. doi:10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0748 Mukhanova, Y.I., K.A. Trebukhina, and O.I. Kozlova. 1979. The production of heterotic hybrids of spinach. Ref. Zh. 8:310. Nagata, R.T., and M.L. Stratton. 1994. Development of an objective test for tipburn evaluation. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 107:99–101. Nolte, K. 2010. Baby leaf or spring mix. University of Arizona. http://cals.arizona.edu/fps/sites/cals. arizona.edu.fps/files/cotw/Baby Leaf or Spring Mix.pdf (accessed 21 Feb. 2013). Obermeier, C., J.L. Sears, H.Y. Liu, K.O. Schlueter, E.J. Ryder, J.E. Duffus, S.T. Koike, and G.C. Wisler. 2001. Characterization of distinct tombusviruses that cause diseases of lettuce and tomato in the western United States. Phytopathology 91:797–806. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.8.797 O’Malley, P.J., and R.W. Hartmann. 1989. Resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus in lettuce. HortScience 24:360–362. Parlevliet, J.E. 1968. The influence of sowing date and germination temperature on yield of spinach and chervil. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 16:53–57. Reynes-Chin-Wo, S., Z. Wang, C. Beitel, A. Kozik, S. Chi, W. Chen, M.J. Truco, X. Xu, L. Froenicke, D. Lavelle, B. Yang, I. Korf, J. Wang, and R. Michelmore. 2012. Lettuce genome update. Paper

84

Simko, Hayes, Mou & McCreight

presented at: Plant & Animal Genomes XX Conference. Town & Country Convention Center, San Diego, CA 12–16 Jan. Abstract W188. Robinson, R.W., J.D. McCreight, and E.J. Ryder. 1983. The genes of lettuce and closely related species. In: J. Janick, editor, Plant breeding reviews. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. p. 267–293. Rodenburg. 1960. Varieties of lettuce: An international monograph. Varietal Descr. 3, Inst. voor de Verdeling van Tuinbouwgewassen, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Ryder, E.J. 1979a. Leafy salad vegetables. AVI Publ. Co., Westpoint, CT. Ryder, E.J. 1979b. ‘Salinas’ lettuce. HortScience 14:283–284. Ryder, E.J. 1983. Inheritance, linkage, and gene interaction studies in lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:985–991. Ryder, E.J. 1988. Early flowering time in lettuce as influenced by a second flowering time gene and seasonal variation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113:456–460. Ryder, E.J. 1999. Lettuce, endive and chicory. CAB Int., New York. Ryder, E.J., and D.C. Milligan. 2005. Additional genes controlling flowering time in Lactuca sativa and L. serriola. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 130:448–453. Ryder, E.J., and B.J. Robinson. 1995. Big-vein resistance in lettuce: Identifying, selecting, and testing resistance cultivars and breeding lines. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120:741–746. Ryder, E.J., and W. Waycott. 1998. Crisphead lettuce resistant to tipburn: Cultivar Tiber and eight breeding lines. HortScience 33:903–904. Sackett, C. 1975. Spinach. Fruit and vegetable facts and pointers. United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association, Washington, DC. Schwember, A.R., and K.J. Bradford. 2010. A genetic locus and gene expression patterns associated with the priming effect on lettuce seed germination at elevated temperatures. Plant Mol. Biol. 73:105–118. doi:10.1007/s11103-009-9591-x Scott, J.C., S.C. Kirkpatrick, and T.R. Gordon. 2010. Variation in susceptibility of lettuce cultivars to fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lactucae. Plant Pathol. 59:139–146. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02179.x Simko, I. 2009. Development of EST-SSR markers for the study of population structure in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J. Hered. 100:256–262. doi:10.1093/jhered/esn072 Simko, I. 2013. Marker-assisted selection for disease resistance in lettuce. In: R.K. Varshney and R. Tuberosa, editors, Translational genomics for crop breeding, Vol. I: Biotic stresses. WileyBlackwell Publ., Hoboken, NJ. Simko, I., R.J. Hayes, and M. Kramer. 2012. Computing integrated ratings from heterogeneous phenotypic assessments: A case study of lettuce post-harvest quality and downy mildew resistance. Crop Sci. 52:2131–2142. doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.02.0111 Simko, I., R.J. Hayes, K.V. Subbarao, and R.G. Sideman. 2010. SM09A and SM09B: Romaine lettuce breeding lines resistant to dieback and with improved shelf life. HortScience 45:670–672. Simko, I., and J. Hu. 2008. Population structure in cultivated lettuce and its impact on association mapping. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 133:61–68. Simko, I., D.A. Pechenick, L.K. McHale, M.J. Truco, O.E. Ochoa, R.W. Michelmore, and B.E. Scheffler. 2009. Association mapping and marker-assisted selection of the lettuce dieback resistance gene Tvr1. BMC Plant Biol. 9:135. Smith, R. 2012. Changing vegetable crop production practices. Growing Produce. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://www.growingproduce.com/article/32166/changing-vegetable-crop-production-practices (accessed 26 Feb. 2013). Smith, R.F., S.A. Fennimore, and M. LeStrange. 2009. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Lettuce. Weed management for organic lettuce production. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r441700511.html (accessed 26 Feb. 2013). Thibodeau, P.O., and P.L. Minotti. 1969. The influence of calcium on the development of lettuce tipburn. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94:372–376. Thompson, A.E. 1956. The extent of hybrid vigor in spinach. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 67:440–444. Thompson, R.C., and E.J. Ryder. 1961. Descriptions and pedigrees of nine varieties of lettuce. Tech. Bull. 1244, USDA, Washington, DC. Tibbitts, T.W., and R.R. Rao. 1968. Light intensity and duration in the development of lettuce tipburn. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 93:454–461.

Lettuce and Spinach

85

Truco, M.J., H. Ashrafi, A. Kozik, H. van Leeuwen, J. Bowers, S. Reyes Chin Wo, K. Stoffel, H. Xu, T. Hill, A. Van Deynze, and R.W. Michelmore. 2013. An ultra high-density, transcript-based, genetic map of lettuce. G3 (Bethesda) 3:617–631. USDA-ERS. 2012. Recent trends in GE adoption 2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx (accessed 14 Mar. 2013). USDA-ERS. 2013. U.S. lettuce statistics 2011. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID = 1576 (accessed 21 Feb. 2013). USDA-NASS. 2011. National statistics for spinach. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php (accessed 19 Dec. 2012). USDA-NASS. 2012a. California fresh market spinach, 1920–2011. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/California/Historical_Data/index.asp (accessed 10 Feb. 2013). USDA-NASS. 2012b. Vegetable historic data. Spinach 1923–1956. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Washington/Historic_Data/vegetables/spinach.pdf (accessed 19 Dec. 2012). Vance Publishing. 2013. The Packer produce market guide. Vol. CXX. No. 54. Vance Publ., Lenexa, KS. Waycott, W.W. 1995. Photoperiodic response of genetically diverse lettuce accessions. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120:460–467. Weare, B.C. 2009. How will changes in global climate influence California? Calif. Agric. 63:59–66. doi:10.3733/ca.v063n02p59 Welch, J.E., R.G. Grogan, F.W. Zink, G.M. Kihara, and K.A. Kimble. 1965. Calmar: …A new lettuce variety resistant to downy mildew. Calif. Agric. 19:3–4. Whitaker, T.W. 1974. Lettuce: Evolution of a weedy Cinderalla. HortScience 9:512–514. Whitaker, T.W., and D.E. Pryor. 1941. The inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum) in lettuce. Phytopathology 31:534–540. Whitaker, T.W., E.J. Ryder, V.E. Rubatzky, and P.V. Vail. 1974. Lettuce production in the United States. Agric. Handb. 221. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC. Wisler, G.C., and J.E. Duffus. 2000. A century of plant virus management in the Salinas Valley of California, ‘East of Eden’. Virus Res. 71:161–169. doi:10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00196-9 Wurr, D.C.E., and J.R. Fellow. 1991. The influence of solar radiation and temperature on the head weight of crisp lettuce. J. Hortic. Sci. 66:183–190. Wurr, D.C.E., J.R. Fellow, and K. Phelps. 1996. Investigating trends in vegetable crop response to increasing temperature associated with climate change. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 66:255– 263. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00925-9 Yanagi, A.A., R.M. Bullock, and J.J. Cho. 1983. Factors involved in the development of tipburn in crisphead lettuce in Hawaii. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:234–237. Zink, F.W. 1956. Growth and nutrient absorption in spring spinach. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 83:675–679.