Low power quantum-cascade laser photoacoustic ...

1 downloads 0 Views 450KB Size Report
The development of a novel type of highly sensitive multipass resonant PA cell for trace-gas detection enables the use of new compact low-power laser sources ...
Published in Analytical Sciences 17, Special issue, s497-s499, 2001 which should be used for any reference to this work

1

Low power quantum-cascade laser photoacoustic spectrometer for trace-gas monitoring Markus Nägele1, Daniel Hofstetter2, Jérome Faist2 and Markus W. Sigrist1 1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Institute of Quantum Electronics, Laboratory for Laser Spectroscopy and Environmental Sensing, http://www.iqe.ethz.ch/irp/ CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland, e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Neuchâtel, Institute of Physics, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland The development of a novel type of highly sensitive multipass resonant PA cell for trace-gas detection enables the use of new compact low-power laser sources such as quantum-cascade lasers (QCLs) because the effective power present in the cell is increased by a factor of ~ 20 compared to a one-pass arrangement. Based on an existent mobile CO2 -laser photoacoustic (PA) spectrometer we implemented additionally a pulsed QCL with a tunable emission wavelength between 981.5 cm-1 and 983.5 cm-1 working near room temperature as pump source. Its average power is ≤ 1.7 mW and the laser-line width is < 0.2 cm-1. With reference to HITRAN data a minimum measurable absorption coefficient αmin = 2.2×10-5cm-1 corresponding to a minimum measurable line intensity Smin = 2.5×10-25 cm-1/(molecule⋅cm-2) is achieved even at the low QCL power. First measurements are presented to characterize the performance of our QCL based system. Experimental In previous work we reported on the implementation of a mobile CO2 -laser based photoacoustic (PA) spectrometer and its successful application for in-situ multicomponent monitoring of trace gases in different environments [1]. Recently we have developed a novel type of multipass resonant PA cell to further increase the detection sensitivity of the system [2]. This highly sensitive PA sensor is particularly attractive in combination with new compact low-power lasers such as quantum-cascade lasers (QCLs) [3-5] as pump sources. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the mobile experimental set-up. As light source we use either a line-tuneable sealed-off 12 16 C O2 - or 13C16O2 -laser with an active power stabilisation based on a Piezo-driven outcoupling mirror or, alternatively, a QCL. p ie z o re g u la tio n (P C -c o n tro lle d )

lin e -tu n a b le C O 2-la s e r

p o w e r s u p p ly s te p m o to r c o n tro l (P C -c o n tro lle d )

p o w e r m e te r F L

C h o p p e r (P C -c o n tro lle d )

b e a m e x p a n d e r m u ltip a s s p h o to a c o u s tic c e ll

B S

p o w e r m e te r

B S q u a n tu m c a sc a d e la s e r

lo c k -in a m p lifie r (P C -c o n tro lle d )

H e N e la s e r

M

s p e c tru m a n a ly s e r

v a c u u m p u m p

g a s in le t (g a s m ix in g u n it, a m b ie n t a ir)

h u m id ity m e te r m e te o ro lo g ic a l d a ta lo g g e r

d a ta c o lle c to r (P C -c o n tro lle d )

p re ssu re g a u g e C O , C O 2-, N O -m o n ito r

Fig. 1: Experimental set-up of the laser photoacoustic spectrometer (BS – beam splitter, FL – flipper mirror, M – mirror) The pulsed QCL used in our study is operated near room temperature. The emission wavelength is varied by changing the temperature (controlled by a Peltier cooler). The coefficient for the laser wavelength tuning is -0.06 cm-1/K in the temperature region between -5 and -40°C (resulting in a tuning range of ≈ 3 cm-1). The average power coupled into the cell is ≤ 1.7 mW and the laser-line width is < 0.2 cm-1. The QCL operates at a duty cycle of < 4% with a pulse duration around 30 ns.

The optical adjustment of the system and particularly of the PA cell can be checked with the visible beam of a HeNe-laser coupled into the optical path via a flipper mirror. The wavelength of the different CO2-laser emission lines can be checked by a spectrometer. After expanding the laser beam by a telescope it is coupled into the photoacoustic (PA) cell. Additionally to the PA amplitude and phase we measure further data (such as CO-, NO-, CO2-concentration, humidity, wind velocity, wind direction, solar radiation, different system temperatures ...) as depicted in Fig. 1. Measurements are done without any pre-concentration or pre-treatment of the gas. Figure 2 illustrates the set-up of the resonant multipass PA cell, basically consisting of two parts: A resonant PA cell [6,7] is integrated into a Herriott-multipass arrangement [8,9] with 36 passes (extendable to up to 78 passes) resulting in an optical path length of 24 m. In the centre of the cell a microphone array (with 16 microphones) is implemented for detection of the first longitudinal resonant acoustic mode at 1250 Hz. The cell with a volume of 2.3 l is designed for stop-flow and flow-mode operation (up to 2 litres/min). To reduce acoustic noise, caused by the gas flow and window heating signals from the ZnSeBrewster windows, two buffer volumes adjacent to the resonator are attached. te m p e ra tu re se n so r s p h e ric a l c o n c a v e m irro r

b u ffe r v o lu m e

b u ffe r v o lu m e

g a s o u tle t

ra d ia l m ic ro p h o n e a rra y

g a s in le t

te m p e ra tu re se n so r

fla t m irro r la s e r b e a m

B re w s te r w in d o w

B re w s te r w in d o w

d im e n s io n s : c e ll o v e P A re so b u ffe r v to ta l o p p a th le n

ra ll n a to r o lu m e tic a l p a th le n g th g th w ith in th e P A p a rt

le n g th : 7 0 0 m 1 2 0 m 6 0 m 2 3 6 8 0 m 1 5 1 0 0 m m

m m

m m

d ia m 1 4 0 5 0 1 2 0

e te r: m m m m m m

n u m b e r o f m ic ro p h o n e s : n u m b e r o f b e a m p a sse s: c u rv a tu re ra d iu s o f th e m irro rs :

s p h e ric a l c o n c a v e m irro r

1 6 3 6 1 0 0 0 m m

Fig. 2: Multipass photoacoustic cell with Herriott cell, photoacoustic resonator and cylindrical microphone array.

2

Optical multipass arrangement of the PA cell

Measurements and results

As a result of the optical multipass arrangement a η -times higher laser power is available inside the cell for the generation of the PA signal than in a usual one-pass arrangement. Figure 3 shows the calculated power enhancement factor η versus the number of beam passes taking into account transmission and reflection losses.

The spectral tuning range of our system with a QCL as pump source is demonstrated by a photoacoustic spectrum taken of pure CO2 at atmospheric pressure and room temperature in the wavelength region around 982 cm-1. The 10R(30) and 10R(32) absorption lines of CO2 are clearly resolved as illustrated in Figure 5. The rather small PA signal is due to the non-linear dependence at high gas concentrations as discussed above.

25

1 0.9

+26%

0.8

Transmission

10

0.7

max. number of passes

15

current adjustment

effective power enhancement factor η

20

0.6 0.5

a

0.4 0.3

5

0.2 0.1 0 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 920

80

number of passes

Fig. 3: Calculated effective power enhancement factor η in dependence of the number of beam passes in the Herriott cell

940

960

980

1000 1020 Wavenumber [cm-1]

1040

1060

1080

1100

12 baseline corrected Lorentz-Fit photoacoustic signal

10R(30)

10

Non-linear dependence of the PA signal on gas concentration At high trace-gas concentrations the radiation absorption by the gas is not neglectable any more for the calculation of the power enhancement factor η introduced above. The consequence is a non-linear dependence of the PA signal on the gas absorption coefficient α (ν~ ) as depicted in Figure 4. Using low-power pump sources like QCLs implies small PA signals. Hence, only higher gas concentrations (assuming a comparable PA signal amplitude and identical absorption coefficient) are measurable in comparison to the CO2 -laser based system. However, the manufacturing process of the QCls permits the tailoring of the emission wavelength which can thus be adapted to the maximum absorption of the gas.

10R(32)

photoacoustic signal [mV/W]

In general the PA signal is proportional to the absorbed laser power, i.e. to both the incident power and the absorption coefficient ( ~ ) of the absorbing gas. This is one important fact that enables the use of new low-power lasers as pump sources.

b

8

6

4

2 averaged QCL-power @ -2 °C: 0.8 mW

0 981.5

982.0

averaged QCL-power @ -38 °C: 1.7 mW

982.5 983.0 wavenumber [cm -1]

983.5

984.0

Fig. 5 a: Calculated CO2 transmission spectrum (15 m path length = optical path length within the PA part of our cell, 1 bar, room temperature, HITRAN database [10]) b: Photoacoustic spectrum near 982 cm-1 of two CO2absorption lines, recorded with a quantum cascade laser as pump source.

20 18

power enhancement factor η

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.0E-10

1.0E-09

1.0E-08

1.0E-07

1.0E-06

1.0E-05

1.0E-04

1.0E-03

1.0E-02

absorption coefficient α=[cm-1/atm.]

Fig. 4: Calculated effective power enhancement factor versus the gas absorption coefficient α (ν~ )

Figure 6 shows measurements on methanol vapor (CH3OH) buffered in synthetic air (80% N2, 20% O2) at 1 bar and room temperature. The FTIR spectrum of 500 ppmV CH3OH between 980 and 1080 cm-1 is plotted as overview (Fig. 6a) whereas Fig. 6b shows a detailed view with a spectral resolution of 0.2 cm-1 between 981 and 983.5 cm-1. This spectrum can be compared with the QCL-PA spectrum of 100 ppmV CH3OH vapor (Fig. 6c). As depicted in part a, the emission wavelength of the QCL isn’t adapted to the maximum absorption of methanol which occurs at 1033 cm-1. However, it can be measured with a signalto-noise ratio (SNR) ≈ 5 at 983.5 cm-1. The noise decrease with increasing wavenumber is explained by the increasing laser power. These measurements imply a detection limit (with SNR=3) for methanol of 60 ppmV at this spectral position. (Using a QCL with an emission wavelength around 1033 cm-1 and similar power we estimate a detection limit of 5ppmV.)

3

The detection limit and the minimum measurable absorption coefficient αmin of the QCL-PA system can be determined either from the CO2 - or the methanol measurement: With reference to HITRAN CO2 data, αmin = 2.2×10-5cm-1, corresponding to a minimum measurable line intensity Smin=2.5×10-25cm-1/(molecule⋅cm-2), is achieved even at the low QCL average power of ≤1.7 mW. 1. 6

© Galactic Industri es Cor porati on,395 M ain Street,Sal em,NH 03079,USA

a

1. 4

Absorbance

1. 2 1 .8 .6 .4 .2

0

1080

1060

1040

1020 Wavenumber (cm-1)

1000

980

960

© Galac tic Industries Corporation, 395 Main Street,Salem ,N H 03079,U SA

.11

b

.1

Absorbance

.09 .08 .07 .06

Acknowledgement

.05 .04 .03

983

982.5

982

981.5

981

Wavenumber (cm-1)

5 4.5 photoacoustic signal [a.u.]

absorption interferences in multicomponent mixtures that sometimes limit the detection selectivity of the system when operated with a discretely tunable laser. Furthermore, absorption lines of other gases can be recorded in wavelength regions not accessible with CO2 -laser lines. And finally, the dimensions and costs of the system can be reduced substantially. The present limitations of QCLs in laser spectrometers are the rather broad line width, the low power and the limited wavelength availability. By using a QCL with similar output power but other emission wavelength (within the atmospheric windows around 4 and 10 µm where the CO2 - and H2O absorption is negligible) other gases such as CO, NO, N2O, CH4 or NH3 could be monitored with our current system. Up to now, different QCLs with wavelengths around 4.6 µm, 5.2 µm, 7.9 µm, 9.4 µm and 10.2 µm are available [3-5], but most of them operate at temperatures below 80 K which aren’t reachable with a simple Peltier-cooling system as used in our mobile spectrometer. Since our system is optimized for continuous wave lasers as pump sources the acoustic resonance frequency of the cell isn’t adapted to the pulse repetition frequency of the QCL. This results in a correspondingly lower PA signal. Our first QCL-PA measurements could thus not take full advantage of the acoustic resonance enhancement.

c

4

This project is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the ETH Zurich. The QCL is provided by D. Hofstetter and J. Faist from the University of Neuchâtel, Institute of Physics, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. References

3.5

[1]

3 2.5

[2] [3]

2 1.5 1 983.5

983

982.5 982 wavenumber [cm-1]

981.5

981

Fig. 6 a: FTIR spectrum of 500 ppmV methanol (CH3OH) buffered in synthetic air at 1 bar and 300 K (path length 3 m) [11] b: enlarged part of a: in the wavenumber region 981 – 983.5 cm-1 c: PA spectrum of 100 ppmV methanol buffered in synt. air at 1 bar and 300 K measured with our QCL-PA system in the wavenumber region 981 – 983.5 cm-1 Comparison between the CO2 - and the quantum-cascade-laser as pump source The deployment of the described pulsed QCL as pump source results in a minimum measurable absorption coefficient

[4] [5]

[6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

αmin (QCL) = 2.2×10-5cm-1 (SNR=3). With a line-tunable continuous wave CO2-laser as pump source sub-ppbV (< 10-9 per volume)-concentrations can be measured with laser powers of a few Watts [2], corresponding to αmin(CO2) = 2×10-9cm-1 (SNR=3). In comparison to discretely tunable CO2 lasers QCLs offer some advantages: Ideally, the wavelength of QCLs can be tuned to individual molecular absorption lines thereby reducing

[11]

M.A. Moeckli, C. Hilbes and M.W. Sigrist, Appl. Phys. B, 1998, 67, 449. M. Nägele and M.W. Sigrist, Appl. Phys. B, 2000, 70, 895. F. Capasso, J. Faist, C. Sirtori and A.Y. Cho, Solid State Comm., 1997, 102, 231. D. Hofstetter, J. Faist, M. Beck and A. Müller, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999, 75, 665. B.A. Paldus, T.G. Spence, R.N. Zare, J. Oomens, F.J.M. Harren, D.H. Parker, G. Gmachl, F. Cappasso, D.L. Sivco, J.N. Baillargeon, A.L. Hutchinson and A.Y. Cho, Opt. Lett., 1999, 24, 178. A. Karbach, P. Hess, J. Chem. Phys., 1986, 84 (b), 2945. C. Hornberger, M. König, S.B. Rai, W. Demtröder, Chem. Phys., 1995, 190, 171. D. Herriott, H. Kogelnik, R. Kompfner, Appl. Opt., 1964, 3, 523. J.B. McManus, P.L. Kebabian, M.S. Zahniser, Appl. Optics, 1995, 34, 3336. L.S. Rothman, R.R. Gamache, R.H. Tipping, C.P. Rinsland, M.A.H. Simth, D. Chris Benner, V. Malathy Devi, J.-M. Flaud, C. Camy-Peyret, A. Perrin, A. Goldman, S.T. Massie, L.R. Brown, and R.A. Toth, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1992, 48, 469. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (EPA/OAQPS), http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/ftir/welcome.html.