Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Gene ... - Semantic Scholar

1 downloads 1 Views 930KB Size Report
Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Gene Expression in the Bovine Brain: Anatomical Localization and Regulation by Ovarian State'. G.D. WEESNER,2 '4 ...

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 49, 431-436 (1993)

Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Gene Expression in the Bovine Brain: Anatomical Localization and Regulation by Ovarian State' G.D. WEESNER, 2 '4 P.G. HARMS, '6 N.H. McARTHUR, 6 J.M. WILSON,5 D.W. FORREST,S T.J. WU,3 '5 and D.W. PFAFF 4 Laboratory of Neurobiology and Behavior,4 The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021 Departments of Animal Science 5 and Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health,6 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT Experiments were conducted to identify neurons in the bovine brain that express the LHRH gene and to determine whether LHRH mRNA levels are influenced by the ovaries. Two groups of postpubertal heifers were utilized: heifers killed during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle (LUTEAL, n = 5) and heifers killed 14-16 wk following ovariectomy (OVX, n = 5). In situ hybridization was performed through use of a 52P-end-labeled deoxyoligonucleotide (59 mer) complementary to the human LHRH mRNA sequence. LHRH-expressing neurons were identified in the diagonal band of Broca, the preoptic area, and the anterior hypothalamus in a manner consistent with immunocytochemical localization. Reduced silver grains, proportional to LHRH mRNA content, were quantified (in pixels, 45x objective) with an image analysis system. Expected serum hormone concentration differences between endocrine states were confirmed by radioimmunoassay for progesterone (LUTEAL > OVX, p < 0.01) and for LH (OVX > LUTEAL, p < 0.01). Compared to the OVX group, LUTEAL heifers had 34% fewer LHRH-expressing neurons (p < 0.05); on the average, these neurons possessed 28% fewer pixels/cell (p < 0.01), indicating fewer copies of LHRH mRNA per cell. When the numbers of pixels in all labeled cells were totalled, LUTEAL animals had 57% fewer pixels (p < 0.05) than did the OVX females-probably reflecting a decrease in LHRH synthetic capacity in the LUTEAL animals. Therefore, during the mid-luteal phase of the bovine estrous cycle, ovarian steroid (i.e., luteal progesterone) suppression of LHRH release (as reflected by serum LH) is coincident with decreased LHRH mRNA in the brain. In summary, the quantity of LHRH mRNA, as well as the number of detectable LHRH-expressing neurons in the bovine brain, is influenced by the ovaries.

INTRODUCTION Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) is a decapeptide synthesized by neurons in the rostral preoptic area of the bovine brain. It is then transported to the median eminence (infundibulum), where it is released into the hypothalamic-hypophyseal portal system and delivered to the pituitary. The pulsatile release of LH by the pituitary is tightly coupled to the pulsatile release of LHRH in pigs [1], sheep [2,3], rats [4], and monkeys [5]. Immunocytochemical analysis has revealed that the distribution of LHRH neurons forms a loosely arranged continuum in the diagonal band of Broca, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT), medial preoptic area (POA), and the rostral-most anterior hypothalamus in the bovine brain [6, 7]. A similar distribution of LHRH neurons was reported in the sheep [8, 9]. In rats, expression of the LHRH gene fluctuates with the endocrine status of the animal. In general, LHRH mRNA levels are increased when LH release is high. For example, levels of LHRH mRNA are elAccepted April 12, 1993. Received September 18, 1992. 'This research was supported in part by NRSA fellowship HD07373 (G.D.W.) and by HD05751 (D.W.P.), both from NIH. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Paper No. 31091 '2Correspondence: Dr. Gary D. Weesner, USDA-ARS Animal Physiology Unit, Animal Science Research Center, S-107, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. FAX: (314) 884-4789. 3Current address: Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.

431

evated during the preovulatory LH surge as well as during an estrogen-induced LH surge [10-13], and levels are decreased in pentobarbital-treated [10] and prazosin-treated rats [14]. In domestic animals, it is unknown whether expression of the LHRH gene responds to changes in the endocrine status of the animal. Therefore, we designed an experiment to examine cellular levels of LHRH and mRNA in the brains of cows representing two different endocrine states-one with (presumably) high LHRH secretion and one with low LHRH secretion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals Ten crossbred heifers (18-26 mo of age) were divided into two groups. One group, designated OVX, consisted of five heifers ovariectomized 14-16 wk before the study. The second group, designated LUTEAL, consisted of five heifers killed during the mid-luteal phase (Days 9-10, Day 0 = estrus) of the estrous cycle. Serum concentrations of progesterone were used to verify stage of the estrous cycle. All heifers were slaughtered in the abattoir of the Texas A&M University Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center. Slaughter procedures conformed to State and Federal guidelines for humane slaughter of animals. After stunning was performed by captive bolt, a tissue fragment was dissected from each brain. The anterior border of the frag-

432

WEESNER ET AL.

ment was approximately 1 cm rostral to the optic chiasm, 1 cm on each side of midline, and 1 cm dorsal to the ventral surface of the brain. The caudal border was the posterior edge of the mammillary bodies, 0.5 cm lateral to midline, and 1 cm dorsal to the ventral surface. The tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 0C until further processing. Blood samples were collected following exsanguination, processed as serum, and stored at -20°C. In Situ Hybridization Brains were sectioned (7 pxm) on a cryostat and mounted onto organosilane-subbed slides. Sections were collected throughout the diagonal band of Broca, POA, and the rostral hypothalamic area. Sections were also collected from the mediobasal hypothalamus of two of the brains (one per group). Mounted brain sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4), immersed in triethanolamine, then dehydrated in ethanol. For in situ hybridization, we used a 59-mer deoxyoligonucleotide complementary to the region of the human LHRH mRNA coding for amino acids -5 to +15 of prepro-LHRH [15]. This probe shows 90% homology to the rat LHRH gene [16] and is presumably similar to the bovine sequence. The oligomer was 5' end-labeled with 32p using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The probe was dissolved in 1:1 denatured hybridization buffer:formamide [17] to yield approximately 9 x 106 cpm/ml. Alternate sections then received 50 R1l of this solution. The remaining sections were hybridized with either an identically labeled "sense" control probe or with no probe. As an additional control, some sections were pretreated with RNAse A (100 ptg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to eliminate all mRNA. Hybridization proceeded at 37°C for 48 h. Slides were rinsed in SSC (singlestrength SSC = 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.2) to a final stringency of 0.5-strength SSC, then dehydrated and dipped in photographic emulsion (Kodak NTB3, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY); the autoradiograms were exposed at 4C for four wk. Finally, the sections were developed (Kodak D-19 and fixer) and lightly counterstained with cresyl violet. Quantificationof LHRH mRNA All sections were carefully examined under a light microscope; and for each brain, the region showing maximal numbers of LHRH-expressing neurons was determined. Then, three brain sections (per animal) from this region, selected at 100-ptm intervals, were further analyzed to determine: number of cells expressing the LHRH gene; number of grains per labeled cell; and total number of grains in all labeled cells. The number of labeled cells per section was determined by visual observation. The reduced silver grains, proportional to LHRH mRNA [17], were quantified in each labeled cell (in pixels) via a Bioquant System IV image anal-

ysis system. For all labeled cells, the number of pixels was at least five times background. Analysis of LH and Progesterone Concentration Serum concentration of LH was determined by the double-antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA) originally described by Niswender et al. [18] with the following modifications: 1) anti-ovine LH serum (TEA #35) at a final dilution of 1:500 000 in 0.1% egg white PBS, pH 7.0, was used as the first antibody; 2) bovine LH (USDA-bLH-I-2), radioiodinated (Iodogen method) with 1251, was added on the second day; 3) sheep anti-rabbit gammaglobulin (P-4, Antibodies, Inc., Davis, CA), used at a dilution of 1:40 in 10% polyethylene glycol in PBS, was added on the third day; 4) 24 h after the addition of the second antibody, the assay tubes were centrifuged and supernatant was aspirated and precipitate counted with a Micromedic MACC system; and 5) all values were expressed in terms of the NIH-bLH-B-10 reference preparation. Sensitivity of the LH assay was 0.1 ng/tube. The intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) for standardized serum from ovariectomized cows was 4.73%. Serum progesterone concentrations were quantified by the radioimmunoassay described by Mosley et al. [19]. The first antibody was GDN-337 and was used at a final dilution of 1:17 500. The sensitivity of the assay and the intraassay coefficients of variation were 7.8 pg/tube and 4.4%, respectively. StatisticalAnalyses The Wilcoxin Rank Sum test was used to compare number of LHRH-expressing neurons between experimental groups as well as for comparing total numbers of pixels representing LHRH and mRNA. This test was also used to evaluate differences in serum concentrations of LH and progesterone between the groups. The Kolmolgorov-Smirnov Two-Sample test was used to test for differences in distributions of the number of grains per cell between the groups [20]. RESULTS LHRH mRNA-containing neurons were well labeled throughout the diagonal band of Broca, OVLT, and the rostral-most anterior hypothalamic area. Figure 1 is a drawing of a representative tissue section showing the locations of labeled neurons. This tracing was made with the use of a Zeiss microscope with a camera lucida attachment. Typically, labeled neurons had greater than 1000 pixels covered by silver grains and were clearly distinguishable from unlabeled neurons which typically possessed fewer than 50 pixels. Figure 2 is a photomicrograph showing four LHRHexpressing neurons in the bovine POA as well as several unlabeled cells. The distribution of the labeled neurons was very similar to the immunocytochemical results described by Leshin et al. [6]. For all animals, the medial POA was the

REGULATION OF LHRH mRNA IN THE BOVINE BRAIN

433

AC

*

*,

*

* *

*

/ *

OC FIG. 1. Camera lucida tracing of a representative bovine brain section through the POA showing locations of individual neurons () expressing LHRH mRNA as demonstrated by in situ hybridization. (Abbreviations: OC, optic chiasm; AC, anterior commissure.)

FIG. 3. Relative number of cells expressing the LHRH gene and the total LHRH mRNA as detected by in situ hybridization (mean + SEM). For each comparison, the average of the OVX group was assigned a value of 100%. *p < 0.05 compared to OVX.

brain region with the highest number of labeled cells, with fewer cells found in the more rostral and caudal areas. Additionally, some cells were found in the septum and the nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Serum Hormone Concentrations Radioimmunoassay of serum samples for LH and progesterone confirmed expectations regarding the hormonal differences between the two experimental groups. The OVX

FIG. 2. Photomicrograph of a group of four labeled LHRH-expressing neurons. Grains cover and surround the LHRH cell bodies in a manner consistent 32 P-oligomer for in situ hybridization. with the use of a

434

WEESNER ET AL. %Cella

of 3619 ± 280 pixels/cell with an even distribution above and below the mean. The LUTEAL animals had a mean of 2592 + 379 pixels/cell, with a distribution significantly skewed to the left (p < 0.01) of the OVX group as represented in Figure 4. This shift indicates that LHRH neurons from the LUTEAL animals had fewer copies of LHRH mRNA per cell than the OVX animals.

(a)

OVX

Total Number of Pixels 6.0

7.2

8.4

(b)

The number of pixels in all labeled neurons was totalled to yield a measure of total LHRH mRNA in brain tissue samples from each animal. LUTEAL animals averaged 57% fewer (p < 0.05) total pixels than the OVX animals (59 096 + 19 700 pixels vs. 138 534 23 714 pixels respectively; Fig.

3).

LUTEAL

DISCUSSION

0

1.2

2.4 3.6 4.8 6.0 Pixels/Cell (x 1000)

7.2

8.4

FIG. 4. Frequency distribution histograms showing numbers of grains per positively identified LHRH-expressing cell in (a) OVX and (b) LUTEAL groups. The distribution of the LUTEAL group is shifted to the left of the OVX group (p < 0.01), indicating significantly fewer copies of LHRH mRNA per LHRH neuron in the LUTEAL group compared to OVX.

females had higher serum concentrations of LH than the LUTEAL group (2.61 + 0.85 vs. 0.39 + 0.05 ng/ml; p < 0.01). The LUTEAL group had higher serum progesterone concentrations than the OVX group (2.0 0.37 vs. 0.08 0.007 ng/ml; p < 0.01), verifying that each animal in the LUTEAL group was indeed in the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Number of Labeled LHRH Cells For each analyzed section (three per animal), the number of labeled cells was determined by visual observation using a light microscope. The analyzed brain sections from OVX cows averaged 12.6 + 1.6 labeled LHRH neurons per section while the LUTEAL group brain sections averaged just 8.3 - 1.1-a 34% decrease (Fig. 3,p < 0.05). It appears that an ovarian factor, in likelihood progesterone, suppresses some LHRH neurons to a point at which they either stop expressing the LHRH gene or express it only at undetectable levels. Amount of LHRH mRNA Per Cell For all labeled cells, the number of pixels per cell (proportional to reduced silver grains) was determined. This value is proportional to number of LHRH mRNA copies per cell [17]. The LHRH neurons from OVX animals had a mean

One goal of the present project was to determine whether expression of the LHRH gene in the bovine brain was dependent on ovarian status of the female. We chose two groups of animals expected to have very different LHRH secretory patterns-with the OVX having a high rate of LHRH release and LUTEAL having a lower rate. Studies in sheep [21] and rats [4,22] have demonstrated that the in vivo LHRH pulse frequency is significantly higher in gonadectomized animals than in gonad-intact animals or in those under the negative feedback effects of ovarian steroids [23, 24]. The LHRH pulse frequency is also dependent on the stage of the estrous cycle in sheep [25]. On the basis of previous experiments, we expected that the LHRH pulse generator in the OVX group would produce about 30 LH pulses per 24 h [26, 27] while the LUTEAL animals would have only 6-8 LH pulses per 24 h [28, 29]. Although it was not possible to directly measure the in vivo release of LHRH in these animals, it is likely that the 6-7fold difference in serum LH concentrations between the two groups reflects differences in LHRH release. As a prerequisite for this project, we had to determine whether measurement of LHRH mRNA was possible in the bovine brain, given that the bovine LHRH gene has not yet been sequenced. The deoxyoligonucleotide probe utilized for this study is 100% complementary to the human LHRH mRNA sequence and is complementary to 90% of the rat sequence. We feel confident that our probe was hybridizing to bovine LHRH mRNA because 1) sections not receiving this probe revealed no labeled neurons; 2) the use of a 32p. labeled "sense" control oligomer, identical in sequence to the LHRH mRNA sequence, yielded no hybridization signal; 3) the cells that were labeled by our probe showed an anatomical distribution similar to that of LHRH neurons identified by immunocytochemistry [6, 7]; and 4) treatment of the sections with RNAse eliminated all hybridization signal. We found that LHRH mRNA-containing neurons were scattered throughout the diagonal band of Broca, OVLT, POA,

REGULATION OF LHRH mRNA IN THE BOVINE BRAIN

and the anterior hypothalamic area. Additional neurons were found in the medial septum and the nucleus of the stria terminalis. The majority of the neurons were located around the OVLT and medial POA (see Fig. 1), with significantly fewer neurons observed at locations rostral and caudal to this region. Occasionally, clusters of 2-5 labeled cells were observed (Fig. 2). The anatomical distribution of our labeled neurons was not different from that described in cattle by Leshin et al. [6] or from the pattern described for the sheep [8, 9]. It was also similar to that described by Dees and McArthur [7], except that we found no labeled cells in the mediobasal hypothalamus. Our results demonstrate that in the bovine forebrain, content of LHRH mRNA is influenced by the ovary. Heifers killed during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle, that is, while under the inhibitory influence of ovarian steroids (i.e., luteal progesterone), had significantly fewer detectable LHRH neurons and fewer copies of LHRH mRNA per labeled neuron. Overall, the LUTEAL phase animals had 57% fewer pixels, representing LHRH mRNA, than did the OVX females. It is likely that this measure reflects a decrease in LHRH synthetic capacity in the LUTEAL females. Examination of cellular levels of LHRH mRNA in all evaluated labeled cells (n = 125 cells for LUTEAL, n = 189 cells for OVX) revealed that those from LUTEAL females had fewer copies of LHRH mRNA. As shown in Figure 4, cells from OVX animals had what may be a bimodal distribution of pixels/cell. In the LUTEAL females, the distribution was significantly shifted to the left of the OVX distribution, showing one mode around 2000 pixels/cell and no secondary mode. Decreases in LHRH mRNA have also been reported in other experimental models. We have reported that blocking the estrogen-induced LH surge with an alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist (prazosin) prevented the increase in LHRH mRNA that accompanies the surge [13]. Also, prazosin decreased the LHRH mRNA by 47% in OVX rats [14]. Administration of an estrogen receptor antagonist into the POA prevented the diurnal increase in LHRH mRNA observed in estrogen-treated rats [12]. Similarly, pentobarbital administration prevented the proestrus rise in detectable LHRH cell number [10]. Ovarian steroids can either stimulate or inhibit LH release-depending on the dosage, its duration, and the time of day examined. Our results in the cow are consistent with the theory that there is a positive temporal relationship between LHRH release (as reflected by LH) and levels of LHRH mRNA in the POA. In the rat, LHRH mRNA increases in association with steroid-induced LH surges [10,11,13,15], naturally occurring preovulatory LH surges [10,30], and NMDA-induced increases in LH release [31]. Decreases in LHRH mRNA have been observed when LH concentrations are suppressed by the inhibitory effects of gonadal steroids [32, 33]. Thus, increases in LHRH gene expression may frequently be consequent to increased LHRH release.

435

Results presented here demonstrate that the levels of LHRH mRNA and serum LH are suppressed in the LUTEAL vs. the OVX cow. The difference in LHRH release between the two experimental groups is correlated with differences in LHRH mRNA levels. The actual cause for the decreased LHRH mRNA levels in the LUTEAL animals could be twofold: the signal that suppresses LHRH secretion might also suppress LHRH mRNA levels, or the mRNA level may be regulated by the activity of the LHRH neuron such that the decrease results from the relative quiescence of LHRH neurons during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle. On the basis of the current results, we predict that expression of the LHRH gene would also be low during periods of chronically inhibited LHRH secretion. In domestic animals, these periods include pregnancy and lactation, seasonal anestrus, and periods of stress-induced reproductive deficits. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Appreciation is given to Dr. DJ. Bolt, USDA Animal Hormone Program, Beltsville, MD, and to Dr. JJ. Reeves, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, for materials used in the LH assay and to Dr. G.D. Niswender, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, for materials used in the progesterone assay. The authors also extend appreciation to Ms. Pat Chen and Ms. Sandra Scarborough for their technical assistance.

REFERENCES 1. Leshin LS, Kraeling RR, Barb CR, Rampacek GB. Associated luteinizing hormonereleasing hormone and luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized gilts. Dom Anim Endocrinol 1992; 9:77-88. 2. Clarke IJ, Cummins JT. The temporal relationship between gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes. Endocrinology 1982; 111:1737-1739. 3. Levine JE, Pau K-YF, Ramirez VD, Jackson GL. Simultaneous measurement of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone release in unanesthetized, ovariectomized sheep. Endocrinology 1982; 111:1449-1455. 4. Levine JE, Duffy MT. Simultaneous measurement of luteinizing hormone (LH)releasing hormone, LH, and follicle-stimulating hormone release in intact and short-term castrate rats. Endocrinology 1988; 122:2211-2221. 5. Levine JE, Normal RL, Gleissman PM, Oyama TT, Bangsberg DR, Spies HG. In vivo gonadotropin-releasing hormone release and serum luteinizing hormone measurements in ovariectomized, estrogen-treated rhesus macaques. Endocrinology 1985; 117:711-721. 6. Leshin LS, Rund LA, Crim JW, Kiser TE. Immunocytochemical localization of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and proopiomelanocortin neurons within the preoptic area and hypothalamus of the bovine brain. Biol Reprod 1988; 39:963975. 7. Dees WL, McArthur NH. Immunohistochemical localization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the bovine hypothalamus and infundibulum. Anat Rec 1981; 200:281-85. 8. Lehman MN, Robinson JE, Karsch FJ, Silverman A-J. Immunocytochemical localization of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) pathways in the sheep brain during anestrus and the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle. J Comp Neurol 1986; 244:19-35. 9. Caldani M, Batailler M, Thiery JC, Dubois MP. LHRH-immunoreactive structures in the sheep brain. Histochemistry 1988; 89:129-139. 10. Park O-K, Gugneja S, Mayo KE. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression during the rat estrous cycle: effects of pentobarbital and ovarian steroids. Endocrinology 1990; 127:365-372. 11. Rosie R, Thomson E, Fink G. Oestrogen positive feedback stimulates the synthesis of LHRH mRNA in neurones of the rosrtal diencephalon of the rat. J Endocrinol 1990; 124:285-289. 12. Petersen SL, Cheuk C, Hartman RD, Barraclough CA Medial preoptic microimplants of the antiestrogen, keoxifene, affect luteinizing hormone-releasing hor-

436

13.

14.

15. 16.

17. 18. 19.

20. 21. 22.

23.

WEESNER ET AL.

mone mRNA levels, median eminence luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone concentrations and luteinizing hormone release in ovariectomized, estrogen-treated rats. J Neuroendocrinol 1989; 1:279-283. Weesner GD, Krey LC, Pfaff DW. Alpha-I adrenergic regulation of estrogen-induced increases in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone mRNA levels and release. Mol Brain Res 1993; 17:77-82. Weesner GD, Bergen HT, Pfaff DW. Differential regulation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and galanin mRNA levels by alpha-I adrenergic agents in the ovariectomized rat. J Neuroendocrinol 1992; 4:331-336. Rothfield J, Hejtmancik JF, Conn PM, Pfaff DW. In situ hybridization for LHRH mRNA following estrogen treatment. Mol Brain Res 1989; 6:121-125. Adelman JP, Mason AJ, Hayflick JS, Seeburg PH. Isolation of the gene and hypothalamic cDNA for the common precursor of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prolactin release-inhibiting factor in human and rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:179-183. McCabe JT, Pfaff DW. In situ hybridization: a methodological guide. Methods Neurosci 1989; 1:98-126. Niswender GD, Reichert LEJr, Midgley ARJr, Nalbondov AV. Radioimmunoassay for bovine and ovine luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 1969; 84:1166-1173. Mosley WM, Forrest DW, Kaltenbach CC, Dunn TG. Effect of norgestomet on peripheral levels of progesterone and estradiol-17[ in beef cows. Theriogenology 1979; 11:331-341. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of statistics: A biometrical Approach, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1980. Caraty A Locatelli A. Effect of time after castration on secretion of LHRH and LH in the ram. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 82:263-269. Dluzen DE, Ramirez VD. In vivo activity of the LHRH pulse generator as determined with push-pull perfusion of the anterior pituitary gland of unrestrained intact and castrate male rats. Neuroendocrinology 1987; 45:328-332. Caraty A, Locatelli A, Martin GB. Biphasic response in the secretion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in ovariectomized ewes injected with oestradiol. J Endocrinol 1989; 123:375-382.

24. Karsch FJ, Cummins JT, Thomas GB, Clarke IJ. Steroid feedback inhibition of pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe. Biol Reprod 1987; 36:1207-1218. 25. Clarke 1J,Thomas GB, Yao B, Cummins JT. GnRH secretion throughout the ovine estrous cycle. Neuroendocrinology 1987; 46:82-88. 26. Kinder JE, Garcia-Winder M, Imakawa K Day ML, Zalesky DD, D'Occhio ML, Stumpf 'IT, Kitrtock RJ, Schanbacher BD. Circulating concentrations of 171-estradiol influence pattern of LH in circulation of cows. Dom Anim Endocrinol 1991; 8:463469. 27. Wolfe MW, Roberson MS, Stumpf TTr,Kittock RJ, Kinder JE. Circulating concentrations and pattern of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in circulation are changed by circulating concentration of 17p-estradiol in the bovine male and female. J Anim Sci 1992; 70:248-253. 28. Rahe CH, Owens RE, Fleeger JL, Newton HJ, Harms PG. Pattern of plasma luteinizing hormone in the cyclic cow: dependence upon the period of the cycle. Endocrinology 1980; 107:498-503. 29. Walters DL, Schams D, Schallenberger E. Pulsatile secretion of gonadotrophins, ovarian steroids and ovarian oxytocin during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle in the cow. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 71:479-491. 30. Zoeller RT, Young III WS. Changes in cellular levels of messenger ribonucleic acid levels gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the anterior hypothalamus of female rats during the estrous cycle. Endocrinology 1988; 123:1688-1689. 31. Petersen SL, McCrone S, Keller M, Gardner E. Rapid increase in LHRH mRNA levels following NMDA. Endocrinology 1991; 129:1679-1681. 32. Zoeller RT, Seeburg PH, Toung III WS. In situ hybridization histochemistry for messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) encoding gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH): effect of estrogen on cellular levels of GnRH mRNA in female rat brain. Endocrinology 1988; 122:2570-2577. 33. Selmanoff M, Shu C, Petersen SL, Barraclough CA, Zoeller RT. Single cell levels of hypothalamic messenger ribonucleic acid encoding luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in intact, castrated, and hyperprolactinemic male rats. Endocrinology 1991; 128:459-466.

Suggest Documents