'taxa were present as 104 to 105 cells mlâ1 melted sam- ple' should read 'taxa were present as 104 to 105 cells lâ1 melted sample'. In Discussion, paragraph 4:.
313
Erratum Large viruses in Ross Sea late autumn pack ice habitats Marcia M. Gowing, Blake E. Riggs, David L. Garrison, Angela H. Gibson, Martin O. Jeffries Mar Ecol Prog Ser 241: 1–11, 2002 In 4 places, per ml erroneously appeared instead of per liter: In Abstract: ‘taxa were present as 104 to 105 cells ml–1 melted sample’ should read ‘taxa were present as 104 to 105 cells l–1 melted sample’. In Discussion, paragraph 4: ‘abundant (>105 cells ml–1 melted sample) autotrophs’ should read ‘abundant (>105 cells l–1 melted sample) autotrophs’. ‘diatoms were present in abundance >104 ml–1 melted sample’ should read ‘diatoms were present in abundances >104 l–1 melted sample’. ‘abundant (>105 ml–1 melted sample) heterotrophs’ should read ‘abundant (>105 cells l–1 melted sample) heterotrophs’.
Erratum Phytoplankton composition, photosynthesis and primary production during different hydrographic conditions at the Northwest Iberian upwelling system G. H. Tilstone, F. G. Figueiras, L. M. Lorenzo, B. Arbones Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252: 89–104, 2003 • In Fig. 1a the dots representing the sampling stations were accidentally omitted. The corrected panel is shown here:
• In the Literature Cited, Figueiras FG should not have been included among the authors of Alvarez-Salgado et al. (1993). The correct cite is therefore: Alvarez-Salgado XA, Rosón G, Pérez FF, Pazos Y (1993) Hydrographic variability off the Rías Biaxas (NW Spain) during the upwelling season. J Geophys Res 98: 14447–14455
