Negative Covariance Suggests Mutation Bias in a Two-Locus ... - NCBI

3 downloads 0 Views 166KB Size Report
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 and ... and two-locus allele associations at the gametic and the.

Copyright  1998 by the Genetics Society of America

Negative Covariance Suggests Mutation Bias in a Two-Locus Microsatellite System in the Fish Sparus aurata Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis,*,† Andrew G. Clark,† Costas Batargias,*,‡ Antonios Magoulas‡ and Eleftherios Zouros*,‡ *Department of Biology, University of Crete, 711 10 Iraklion, Crete, Greece, †Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 and ‡ Genetics Department, Institute of Marine Biology of Crete, 710 03, Iraklion, Greece Manuscript received March 10, 1998 Accepted for publication September 8, 1998 ABSTRACT Constraints on microsatellite length appear to vary in a species-specific manner. We know very little about the nature of these constraints and why they should vary among species. While surveying microsatellite variation in the Mediterranean gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata, we discovered an unusual pattern of covariation between two closely linked microsatellite loci. One- and two-locus haplotypes were scored from PCR amplification products of each locus separately and both loci together. In a sample of 211 fish, there was a strong negative covariance in repeat number between the two loci, which suggests a mechanism that maintains the combined length below a constrained size. In addition, there were two clusters of the same combined haplotype length, one consisting of a long repeat array at one locus and a short array at the other and vice versa. We demonstrate that several models of biased mutation or natural selection, in theory, could generate this pattern of covariance. The common feature of all the models is the idea that tightly linked microsatellites do not evolve in complete independence, and that whatever size dependence there is to the process, it appears to “read” the combined size of the two loci.


HE utility of microsatellite repeats for making inferences about population history hinges on an understanding of the mutational processes that generate their remarkable diversity in populations. Several models have been proposed for the evolution of microsatellites (Goldstein et al. 1995; Zhivotovsky and Feldman 1995; Pritchard and Feldman 1996; Zhivotovsky et al. 1997), but comparatively few experimental studies have quantified the evolutionary dynamics of these sequences (Estoup et al. 1995; Garza et al. 1995; Schloetterer et al. 1997; Schug et al. 1997; Field and Wills 1998). Two mutation processes that have been considered are the stepwise mutation model and the infinite alleles model. Both models succeed in explaining some features of these sequences, but the most likely process entails primarily single-repeat changes, with occasional mutations of multiple-repeat steps (Valdes et al. 1993; Di Rienzo et al. 1994). In addition, several studies have suggested a biased tendency of microsatellite arrays to increase rather than decrease in size (Weber and Wong 1993; Rubinsztein et al. 1995; Amos et al. 1996), although this point remains in question. Garza et al. (1995) studied the mutation and evolu-

Corresponding author: Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, 208 Mueller Lab, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected] Genetics 150: 1567–1575 (December 1998)

tion of microsatellites by comparing the range and variability of the same loci in humans and chimpanzees. They concluded that there must be some constraints on these sequences based on the fact that the difference in average allele size between the two species was too small for their evolutionary distance, given the high mutation rate of microsatellites. They proposed that the possible explanations for their results were a biased mutation process, gene conversion, or natural selection. Slatkin (1995) and Goldstein et al. (1995) proposed metrics for computing distances between populations, but Takezaki and Nei (1996) and Feldman et al. (1997) showed that these metrics are informative only for closely related populations. Constraints on allele size lead to a plateau for sufficiently distantly related populations. Although it is possible to estimate distances in the face of such constraints, the species- and locus-specificity of the constraints makes it exceedingly cumbersome to obtain prior empirical data on the limits of repeat numbers in each context. In the process of studying the population structure of the Mediterranean sea bream, Sparus aurata, we isolated two arrays of tandemly repeated GT dinucleotides that are separated by only 75 nucleotides of unique sequence, each of which shows extensive allelic variation. We could amplify DNA from each gene separately and from the two together from each chromosome of an individual fish. This allowed quantification of one-locus and two-locus allele associations at the gametic and the


E. T. Dermitzakis et al.

Figure 1.—Sequence of SA41 locus. The oligonucleotide primers used are indicated in boxes for loci SA41a and SA41b. Note that the two PCR products overlap by 45 nucleotides.

zygotic levels. The patterns of associations observed provide useful insights into the processes that may constrain microsatellite length variation in a chromosomal region. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sampling procedure: Five geographically distinct samples of Mediterranean sea bream (S. aurata) were obtained: 1. IMBC-1: wild animals collected in 1993 from several regions of the Greek seas (n 5 32). These animals are maintained at the Institute of Marine Biology of Crete (IMBC) for experimental purposes. 2. G2: a sample collected in 1996 from the Mesolongi lagoon, Greece (n 5 40). 3. I2: a sample collected in 1996 from the northern Adriatic, Italy (n 5 40). 4. S4: a sample collected in 1996 from Alicante on the Mediterranean coast of Spain (n 5 51). 5. S3: a sample collected from Cadiz in 1996, on the Atlantic side of Gibraltar (n 5 48). Samples were frozen as soon as possible after collection and transferred to the laboratory for tissue excision. DNA was extracted from frozen livers or from muscle preserved in 70% alcohol. In both cases, the DNA extraction protocol of Pogson and Zouros (1994) was followed. PCR amplification: A battery of microsatellite markers for S. aurata has been developed by Batargias and colleagues (C. Batargias, E. T. Dermitzakis, A. Magoulas and E. Zouros, unpublished results). The two microsatellite markers used here are (GT)n repeats that are separated by a 75-bp unique sequence. They are designated as SA41a and SA41b, and the combined region is called SA41. Primers were designed to amplify each locus separately and both together (Figure 1; EMBL accession numbers Y17262 and Y17263). For the amplification of SA41a locus, primers pSA41Fa and pSA41Ra were used; for SA41b locus, primers pSA41Fb and pSA41b; and for both loci (composite PCR product), primers pSA41Rb and pSA41Fa. For the visualization of the PCR products, one primer for each amplification was end-labeled with [g-32P] ATP. Primers pSA41Ra and pSA41Rb were labeled for loci SA41a and SA41b, respectively, and pSA41Fa was labeled for the combined two-locus product (SA41). All reactions were performed in 0.2 ml PCR tubes, 10 ml reactions consisting of 13 PCR buffer (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), 0.6 mm of each of the two primers, 0.2 mm of each dNTP, 1 mm of MgCl2, and 0.04 mm of the labeled primer, 0.25 units of Taq polymerase (GIBCO BRL), and about 10 ng of total genomic DNA. The conditions for each amplification were: 958 for 2 min (hot start) for 1 cycle, and 958 for 45 sec, 528 for 30 sec, 728 for 30 sec for 35 cycles, and 728 for 10 min at the end. Gel electrophoresis and size scoring: PCR products were

resolved in 6% polyacrylamide denaturing gels. The sequence of the phage plasmid M13 was used as a size marker to determine the genotype of certain individuals, which were subsequently used as size markers. To assure accuracy in sizing, the markers covered the full size range of the sampled PCR products. Size scoring of PCR products from autoradiographs was performed at least three times for each case. Associated pairs of allele sizes (327) of the two loci (haplotypes) were inferred by the presence of their composite PCR product for most of the individuals, which was always equal to the sum of the single locus products minus the 45 nucleotides of overlap. In some cases (z10% of the chromosomes analyzed) one of the two haplotypes of an individual was inferred by deduction, when only one of the composite PCR products was visualized (we assumed that the other pair was associated, although we could not see the composite PCR product). This method was used only in cases where the genotyping of the two loci was unambiguous. We inferred 157 genotypes (that correspond to 314 haplotypes) due to the fact that only one of the two composite products was scorable for 13 individuals. We were able to verify the association of all the pairs of alleles obtained by PCR-scoring for the IMBC-1 sample (60 haplotypes: 18.3% of the total number of haplotypes analyzed), by scoring the genotypes of the offspring of experimental crosses between these individuals, and by observing the cosegregation of the alleles of the two loci to the next generation. In all 60 cases the associated pair observed in the offspring coincided with the associated pair inferred from the PCR assay. Permutation tests: Several permutation tests were applied to assess the statistical significance of properties of the observed microsatellite variation. Initial inspection of the data suggested that the variance in the size of the composite PCR product was lower than that expected from random associations of the alleles of the two loci. This motivated a test designed to compare the observed variance of SA41 allele size, which also represents the variance in repeat number, with the variance of random draws of pairs of allele sizes of loci SA41a and SA41b. Specifically, we generated 1000 samples of 327 pairs of allele sizes by shuffling the observed allele sizes of one locus vs. the other. We also applied the same permutation test to compare the observed covariance of the dinucleotide repeat number in the two loci with that expected by chance, as suggested by Pritchard and Feldman (1996).


Allele and genotype frequencies: Mediterranean populations of S. aurata show no significant genetic heterogeneity with regard to allozyme and mitochondrial DNA variation (A. Magoulas, unpublished data; Magoulas et al. 1995, respectively). The null hypothesis of allele

Microsatellite Mutation Bias

homogeneity for the five samples [using the GENEPOP software of Raymond and Rousset (1995)] was not rejected for locus SA41b (P 5 0.248) but was rejected for SA41a (P 5 0.0065). The large number of alleles at this locus (n 5 43) and the relatively small sample sizes may have contributed to this heterogeneity. This heterogeneity has no effect on our analysis of interlocus associations, because spurious linkage disequilibrium may result from the pooling of samples only if the samples are heterogeneous in allele frequencies at both loci (Appendix by Prout in Mitton and Koehn 1973). We have therefore combined the five samples into one (see Appendix for raw data). The allele frequency distributions in this combined sample are given in Figure 2. In the combined sample, genotype frequencies do not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at either locus [P 5 0.232 and P 5 0.0564 for SA41a and SA41b, respectively, as tested by Fisher’s exact test of GENEPOP software, Raymond and Rousset (1995)]. Linkage disequilibrium: Although a direct estimate of recombination rate between the two loci has not been obtained, the spacing of just 75 nucleotides means that recombination must be very rare. An indication of the low rate of recombination is that we did not observe a single instance of the haplotype composed of the two most frequent alleles (SA41a99 and SA41b152). Given this very tight linkage, linkage disequilibrium between alleles at two loci would be eroded mainly through mutation, which could generate multiple combinations of the same length at each of the two loci, yet these combinations would not be identical by descent. Overall linkage disequilibrium among alleles at the two loci was found to be highly significant by the chisquare test (Raymond and Rousset 1995). The same result was obtained employing the chi-square test proposed by Weir [1979, using the POPGENE software by Yeh et al. (1997)]. With the above method (Weir 1979), we were able to identify haplotypes at the two loci that were either in excess or deficiency. Given the tight linkage, the observation of a high degree of linkage disequilibrium was not unexpected. However, we have further observed that there was a strong correlation between the combined length of alleles at the two loci and the probability that their combination will be in excess or deficiency. The highest values of the two-allele linkage disequilibrium (defined as D 5 Pij 2 PiPj, where Pi is the frequency of allele i of locus SA41a, Pj is the frequency of allele j of locus SA41b, and Pij is the frequency of the haplotype with allele i of SA41a and j of SA41b) were found to cluster in two areas of the plane defined by the allelic size of the two loci. More importantly, the two clusters have about the same combined length (Figure 3). Indeed, the two combinations that were in the highest excess were SA41a99-SA41b182 (combined length 236 nucleotides) and SA41a133-SA41b152 (combined length 240 nucleotides). Overall there was a strong neg-


Figure 2.—Distributions of allele sizes for loci SA41a, SA41b, and for the combined loci SA41.

ative correlation between the sizes of the alleles of the two loci (correlation coefficient r 5 20.229, P , 0.001). Permutation test for random association of SA41a and SA41b alleles: The negative correlation of individual allele length motivated a test that would compare the variance and the covariance of the observed data with 1000 replicates generated by random shuffling of the alleles of the one locus against the other, as described in the materials and methods. The distribution of


E. T. Dermitzakis et al.

Figure 3.—Scatter plot of allele sizes of SA41b against SA41a showing the two main clusters of associated alleles. Points were slightly and randomly offset so that overlapping points could be distinguished. A possible model for the generation of such clustering is proposed in Figure 7.

process for generation of gene genealogies without recombination (Hudson 1990; Valdes et al. 1993). Onto these neutral gene genealogies mutations are placed following a Poisson distribution with mean number of mutations mt for each branch of length t. If strictly stepwise mutations occur at both loci, and there are no range constraints, the simulations correctly produce zero (0) correlation (as indicated by the rightmost point in Figure 5A and the leftmost point in Figure 6). All three models employ the observed sample size of 327 pairs of associated alleles and use a mutation parameter of 4Nm 5 30 for both loci in the nonbottlenecked population. This value was chosen because it generated a distribution with mean variance equal to the observed variance under the null model (no bottleneck, mutation bias, or selection). If the mutation rate is 1024, then 4Nm 5 30 corresponds to a population size of 75,000, which is at least plausible. We also tested some other

variance in fragment size and the covariance (Figure 4) between allele size for the two loci obtained from the 1000 permutations in both cases had no overlap with the observed values, indicating that the probability of getting such an extreme value by chance was ,0.001. The significant negative covariance could be generated by a number of distinct mechanisms, some of which were explored with computer simulations described below. Simulations of models of tandem microsatellite evolution: We considered three models that might a priori be expected to generate negative covariance: recovery from a population bottleneck, mutation bias, and natural selection. We do not test the hypothesis of gene conversion proposed by Garza et al. (1995) because the same size was generated by different combinations of alleles of the two loci, thus giving a different sequence for each case. We simulated all three models as described below, and we compared them with the null model that assumes none of the above mechanisms. Simulations of the models make use of the coalescent

Figure 4.—The distribution of covariance generated by 1000 random combinations of allele sizes of the two loci. The observed covariance of pairs of alleles in observed haplotypes is indicated by the arrow and the solid bar.

Figure 5.—(A) Correlation values between allele sizes for a pair of linked microsatellite loci obtained from simulations with different severities of bottlenecks. The population is reduced to a fraction B of the original size and then steps back to the prebottleneck size. The lowest value of B on the plot is 0.01. The plot indicates that very low values of the bottleneck factor are required to generate strong negative correlation. Error bars indicate 61 standard error. (B) The distribution of covariances for 1000 trials of the bottleneck model for two extreme values of the bottleneck factor (B); for the continuous line, B 5 100% (no bottleneck), and the dots represent the case B 5 0.05. Note that the two distributions are almost identical.

Microsatellite Mutation Bias

values of 4Nm (5, 10, and 60) for the mutation bias, the truncation stringency, and the natural selection models, and the qualitative results were robust over this range. A value of 4Nm outside this range is not likely because of the observed level of variation of the microsatellites under study and the available estimates on S. aurata population size. The first model assumed a population bottleneck early in the coalescent tree. The rationale behind this


model is that negative covariance can be generated by chance only if a small number of haplotypes survive, whose allele sizes of the two loci are negatively correlated. We reduced the effective population size (N) to a certain fraction B, (“bottleneck factor”) of the former size, and kept the population size low for an arbitrary period from node 40 to node 320 (where the earliest node is indexed as node 1). After the bottleneck the population stepped back to the initial size. These changes in population sizes are modeled as changes in the intensity of the coalescence, which alters the branch lengths of the tree. In Figure 5A the correlation between the two arrays of repeats is illustrated for different severities of bottleneck. The striking observation is that there is no correlation in allele sizes even when the population is reduced to 1% of its current size. If the population is reduced to the point that only two lineages survive, then by chance those two could yield a negative covariance, but this degree of bottleneck is highly unlikely for S. aurata based on available data for mtDNA and allozymes (Magoulas et al. 1995; A. Magoulas, unpublished data). The distribution of covariance of allele size across replicate simulations is remarkably similar whether the population is bottlenecked or not (Figure 5B). The same result is obtained if the bottleneck is applied from node 3 to node 16 or from node 4 to node 32. In sum, the bottleneck model fails to explain the observed data. In the second model, we assume that there is a bias to the mutation mechanism (during replication) such that mutations increase the size of the array with probability m[1⁄2 2 a(L 2 T)], where m is the mutation rate, a is the degree of bias, L is the sum of lengths of the alleles at the two loci, and T is the threshold size (Figure 6A). Under this model, when the combined alleles have a length ,T, both repeats tend to mutate to a larger size, and when the combined allele size is .T, both repeats tend to mutate to a smaller size. Another form of mutation bias might occur after DNA replication. This model assumes that there is a postreplication scanning mechanism, which truncates one or the other locus when the summed size gets large. If the combined length of the two repeats is greater than threshold T, then with probability s (the “stringency” of the truncation), one or the other array is shortened by one repeat.

Figure 6.—Correlations of allele sizes for two completely linked microsatellites obtained from simulations of three models described in the text. Coalescent simulations were done to obtain genealogies of alleles. (A) Mutation bias: the probability of a mutation increasing the size of an allele is reduced if the allele is larger than a threshold T, and increased if the allele is smaller than T. (B) Truncation mechanism: after replication the repeat has a higher truncation probability if it is larger than a threshold T. (C) Natural selection: the fitness of the allele declines as its size departs from an optimal (Opt) size. Error bars indicate 61 standard error. All three models are able to generate a negative correlation of the repeat length of the two linked loci.


E. T. Dermitzakis et al.

As the stringency increases, the observed correlation in allele sizes becomes more negative (Figure 6B). The third model assumes that natural selection acts on summed array size (with long arrays having low fitness), together with a mutation bias that favors the increase of the repeat array. In all the simulations of this model, a bias of 2% was used, such that 52% of the mutations increased the array length and 48% decreased it. The fitness associated with each allele was w 5 1 2 (L 2 Opt)s, where L is the summed length of the alleles at the two loci, Opt is the optimal size (which is the original size of the common ancestor), and s is the selection coefficient. Selection was modeled as a haploid process, which is equivalent to additive fitness effects in a diploid model. An approximation to haploid selection is made by having each node in the tree generate an array of descendants, each having fitness w. Descendants are drawn from the array with probability equal to their fitness. Again we see that this model can generate negative correlation in allele sizes (Figure 6C). In sum, Figure 6 illustrates that the plausible parameters of models with mutational bias (during or after replication) or natural selection can produce patterns of negative correlation similar to what was observed. Further empirical work, such as direct scoring of mutations, would be needed to discriminate among these mechanisms, but the common feature of all models is an interdependence of the changes at the two linked repeat arrays. Permutation test for Hardy-Weinberg genotype frequencies: One test that may identify a marked variation in fitness of different SA41 genotypes is to determine whether the genotype frequencies correspond to those expected under random union of gametes. In particular, we want to know whether allele sizes that compose diploid genotypes are drawn at random. We addressed this question with two different tests. The negative covariance seen between alleles on a chromosome may extend to a nonrandom association of haplotypes in genotypes. Such a nonrandom association may occur if the genotypic fitness were affected by allele sizes in some way. A permutation test was used to test for departures of this type. We calculated the variance of the sum of the two haplotypes (the sum of the composite lengths SA41 of the two chromosomes) and the variance of their difference for all 157 genotypes whose allelic composition was unambiguous (see materials and methods). Then we drew random pairs of haplotypes by shuffling the observed haplotypes to produce 1000 sets of 157 genotypes, and we calculated the variance of the sum and difference for each set. We then generated the distribution of the variances and compared it with the observed. In both cases, the observed value of variance was placed in the core of the distribution (P . 0.3), indicating that the association of the haplotypes into diploid genotypes was random. We also performed an exact test for Hardy-Weinberg

equilibrium (Raymond and Rousset 1995) of the association of composite lengths, and equilibrium was not rejected (P . 0.05), suggesting a random association of haplotypes in genotypes. DISCUSSION

This study shows that two closely linked microsatellite arrays, whose repeat numbers might be expected to evolve independently from each other, do in fact behave in such a way that there is a “preferred” intermediate combined length. Permutation tests first established that there is a highly significant negative covariance between the repeat lengths for loci SA41a and SA41b. We consider three competing explanations for this pattern of variation, including population history (e.g., bottleneck), mutation bias, and natural selection. In the first model (population history) we assume that the two most common combinations of alleles (SA41a99SA41b182 and SA41a133-SA41b152) represent two ancestral haplotypes at the SA41 locus whose predominance in the present-day populations of gilthead sea bream occur either because these were the haplotypes in the original population that evolved into S. aurata species, or because at some later time the species, as a whole, experienced a severe bottleneck through which these haplotypes were the ones to survive. One difficulty with this explanation is that the initial preponderance of the two alternative major haplotypes is assumed to have arisen by chance. While this is formally possible, our simulations show that it is very unlikely unless the bottleneck is much smaller than other evidence allows (Magoulas et al. 1995; A. Magoulas, unpublished data). Another difficulty with the assumption that the two haplotypes were the only ones present in an ancestral S. aurata population is that the mutation rate at microsatellite loci is large enough to have caused a decay of the temporarily dominant haplotypes. At the same time, the only way a bottleneck could explain the phenomenon is if it were very severe (reduction of the population to ,1% for many generations), because only then would it be likely to have just two major haplotypes survive. The other two models (natural selection and mutation bias) share the prediction that we should have observed more haplotypes with the same combined length but intermediate to the two clusters observed. Selective pressure on repetitive sequences was proposed by Charlesworth et al. (1986, 1994) and by Stephan (1989). Our selection model assumes that the individuals carrying alleles .236 have a selective disadvantage compared to smaller alleles. This is based on the fact that large stretches of repetitive DNA generally result in the instability of the region of DNA carrying these (e.g., Fragile-X in humans). The observation that the sampled zygotes are random combinations of haplotype lengths argues against this hypothesis, although deviations from the null hypothesis of no selection are ex-

Microsatellite Mutation Bias

pected to be seen only when there are strong viability differences among genotypes. Selection might be much weaker than could be detected by this Hardy-Weinberg test. However, by simulating a model with selection we concluded that, to obtain the negative correlation we observed, the selection coefficient s must be large. Therefore, unless SA41 has special properties, something not indicated by the random association of combined haplotype lengths in the genotypes, it seems unlikely that such strong selection is acting on this sequence. Thus, the selection hypothesis is less plausible as an explanation for the observed data, but it cannot be formally rejected. The mutation bias model (before or after replication) assumes that when the combined length passes a threshold of repeats (which in this case may be a haplotype length close to 236), either the replication mechanism favors the decrease of the number of repeats, or there is another mechanism that truncates repeats after replication from one or the other locus. The only problem with this explanation is that it cannot explain the fact that only two clusters are mainly observed. On the contrary, we should have observed many different haplotypes with the same combined length. However, based on the available data we can propose a possible model on how this clustering was generated. It is proposed, and supported by empirical data (Weber and Wong 1993; Rubinsztein et al. 1995; Amos et al. 1996), that mutations in microsatellite repeats are biased with a tendency to make the array grow larger. At the same time one can assume that if replication slippage is the main mechanism for this expansion, a long repeat allows more replication slippage events than a short one. This is indicated by the fact that repeat length is usually positively correlated with the repeat variance (Goldstein and Clark 1995). Starting with a haplotype composed of two short repeats, say of equal size, then by chance some of them will have an increase in SA41a and others in SA41b. These haplotypes would mutate with the larger one mutating faster than the smaller. When the length-constraint mechanism (mutation bias or natural selection) starts to act, it “eliminates” repeats randomly from one of the two arrays with equal probability. Therefore, the long array will lose repeats with the same rate as the short, but it will gain repeats faster than the short array. If this mechanism is allowed to act for long, it will generate two clusters of about the same size but at the two extremes (Figure 7). Although natural selection cannot be rejected as a possible explanation for our results, mutation bias seems more plausible because it fits better the assumptions currently accepted for the evolution of microsatellite repeats. A mutation bias hypothesis is consistent with several studies suggesting constraints on the length of repeat arrays (Garza et al. 1995; Feldman et al. 1997; Goldstein and Pollock 1997; Zhivotovsky et al. 1997). Wierdl et al. (1997) observed several events of


Figure 7.—A parsimonious model for the generation of allele-size clustering (see text for description).

elimination of repeats from GT arrays in yeast when those were very long. In a recent study (Schug et al. 1998) the constraints of microsatellite length in different species were compared, and it appears that these constraints are species-specific or at least specific to some taxonomic groups. The very low observed microsatellite mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster (Schug et al. 1997) shows that the mechanisms responsible for the mutation and evolution of tandem repeats are not completely random. Whether our observation is a result of natural selection or mutation bias remains to be resolved in future studies of additional tightly linked microsatellite loci. The striking negative correlation in allele sizes of linked microsatellite repeats in S. aurata argues that the two loci are not evolving independently, and that either mutation processes or natural selection are driving the pattern of interlocus disequilibrium. We thank Drs. G. Kotoulas, C. Saavedra, and A. Argyrokastritis for helpful discussions and ideas during this study and all the members of Dr. Zouros’s lab in Crete and Dr. Clark’s lab for their support. We also thank Drs. M. Kentouri, T. Patarnello, M. C. Alvarez, and J. P. Andrande for providing samples. We are also grateful to Dr. A. Civetta and B. Lazzaro for critically reading earlier versions of this manuscript and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. E.T.D. was supported by the Greek Foundation of State Scholarships. The project was supported by AIR3 (AIR CT 94 1926, funded by the European Union) to E.Z. and A.M.

LITERATURE CITED Amos, W., S. J. Sawcer, R. W. Feakes and D. C. Rubinsztein, 1996 Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat. Genet. 13: 390–391. Charlesworth, B., C. H. Langley and W. Stephan, 1986 The evolution of restricted recombination and the accumulation of repeated DNA sequences. Genetics 112: 947–962. Charlesworth, B., P. Sniegowski and W. Stephan, 1994 The evo-


E. T. Dermitzakis et al.

lutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371: 215–220. Di Rienzo, A., A. C. Peterson, J. C. Garza, A. M. Valdes, M. Slatkin et al., 1994 Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3166–3170. Estoup, A., L. Garnery, M. Solignac and J. M. Cornuet, 1995 Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics 140: 679–695. Feldman, M. W., A. Bergman, D. D. Pollock and D. B. Goldstein, 1997 Microsatellite genetic distances with range constraints: analytic description and problems of estimation. Genetics 145: 207– 216. Field, D., and C. Wills, 1998 Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisae, and the different distributions of microsatellites in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisae, result from strong mutation pressures and a variety of selective forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 1647–1652. Garza, J. C., M. Slatkin and N. B. Freimer, 1995 Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 594–603. Goldstein, D. B., and A. G. Clark, 1995 Microsatellite variation in North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 3882–3886. Goldstein, D. B., and D. D. Pollock, 1997 Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 88: 335–342. Goldstein, D. B., A. Ruiz Linares, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and M. W. Feldman, 1995 Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6723–6727. Hudson, R. R., 1990 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 17: 1–44. Magoulas, A., K. Sophronides, T. Patarnello, E. Hatzilaris and E. Zouros, 1995 Mitochondrial DNA variation in an experimental stock of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 4: 110–116. Mitton, J. B., and R. K. Koehn, 1973 Population genetics of marine pelecypods. 3. Epistasis between functionally related isoenzymes of Mytilus edulis. Genetics 73: 493–496 (Appendix by T. Prout). Pogson, G. H., and E. Zouros, 1994 Allozyme and RFLP heterozygosities as correlates of growth rate in the scallop Placopectin magellanicus: a test of the associative overdominance hypothesis. Genetics 137: 221–231. Pritchard, J. K., and M. W. Feldman, 1996 Statistics for microsatellite variation based on coalescence. Theo. Pop. Biol. 50: 325–344.

Raymond, M., and F. Rousset, 1995 GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J. Heredity 86: 248–249. Rubinsztein, D. C., W. Amos, J. Leggo, S. Goodburn, S. Jain et al., 1995 Microsatellite evolution: evidence for directionality and variation in rate between species. Nat. Genet. 10: 337–343. Schloetterer, C., C. Vogl and D. Tautz, 1997 Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics 146: 309– 320. Schug, M. D., T. F. C. Mackay and C. F. Aquadro, 1997 Low mutation rates of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 15: 99–102. Schug, M. D., K. A. Wetterstrand, M. S. Guadette, R. H. Lim, C. M. Hutter et al., 1998 The distribution and frequency of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 7: 57–69. Slatkin, M., 1995 A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457–462. Stephan, W., 1989 Tandem-repetitive noncoding DNA: forms and forces. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6: 198–212. Takezaki, N., and M. Nei, 1996 Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144: 389–399. Valdes, A. M., M. Slatkin and N. B. Freimer, 1993 Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics 133: 737–749. Weber, J. L., and C. Wong, 1993 Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2: 1123–1128. Weir, B. S., 1979 Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 35: 235–254. Wierdl, M., M. Dominska and T. Petes, 1997 Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics 146: 769–779. Yeh, R. C., R-C. Yang, T. B. J. Boyle, Z-H. Ye and J. X. Mao, 1997 POPGENE: the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Center, University of Alberta, Canada. Zhivotovsky, L. A., and M. W. Feldman, 1995 Microsatellite variability and genetic distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 11549– 11552. Zhivotovsky, L. A., M. W. Feldman and S. A. Grishechkin, 1997 Biased mutations and microsatellite variation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 926–933. Communicating editor: M. W. Feldman

Microsatellite Mutation Bias



Suggest Documents