New Channel Estimation Scheme Exploiting ... - Semantic Scholar

0 downloads 0 Views 102KB Size Report
systems have been adopted in several wireless standards such as digital audio broadcasting (DAB), terrestrial digital video broadcasting (DVB-T), the IEEE ...
9.1-6 New Channel Estimation Scheme Exploiting Reliable Decision Feedback Symbols for OFDM Systems† Jung-Hyun Park, Mi-Kyung Oh, Yong-Ho Cho and Dong-Jo Park Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-42-869-5438, Fax: +82-42-869-8038 E-mail: {junghyunpark, ohmik, spawn}@kaist.ac.kr, [email protected]

I. INTRODUCTION The orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems have been adopted in several wireless standards such as digital audio broadcasting (DAB), terrestrial digital video broadcasting (DVB-T), the IEEE 802.11a/g wireless local area network (WLAN) standard, IEEE 802.16a and HiperLan/2. Undoubtedly, the OFDM scheme is one of the potential air interface candidates for the next generation mobile wireless systems [1]-[3]. For the coherent modulation schemes in the OFDM systems, channel state information (CSI) is required to compensate channel distortion. Among the various channel estimation schemes, the pilot-aided schemes show good performances. The conventional pilot-aided OFDM systems use the fixed number of pilots to estimate the CSI [4]. The more number of pilots are employed, the more correctly estimated CSI is obtained. However, the increased number of pilot tones decreases the number of data to transmit, resulting in the low bandwidth efficiency. The double maximum likelihood (ML) channel estimation is proposed in [5] to enhance the bandwidth efficiency. First, the CSI is estimated based on the ML estimation scheme by the original pilot symbols, and this CSI compensates the channel distortion. Next, the quasi-pilots are extracted from the decision symbols located in the midpoint position between the original pilot locations. The quasi-pilot means the decision symbols that will be employed as the pilots but not always correct (in fact, the term, “quasi-pilot” is not used in [5]). Finally, the double ML method applies both quasi-pilots and pilots to refine the channel estimate based on the ML estimation scheme. Hence, the channel estimation error of the double ML channel estimation (MLCE) scheme is lower than that of the conventional ML channel estimation scheme. However, these quasi-pilots are not reliable. Therefore, the channel estimation can be deterred by unreliable quasi-pilot † This work was supported in part by the MIC, Korea, under the ITRC Support Program.

0-7803-9459-3/06/$20.00 ¤2006 IEEE

symbols. To overcome this problem, we propose new channel estimation scheme exploiting reliable quasi-pilot symbols for the OFDM systems. II. PROPOSED SCHEME The reliability of the decision feedback symbols depends on their error rate. In other words, the reliable symbol has a low symbol error rate. Channel gain versus SER 2 channel gain sample function symbol error rate

1.8 1.6

yŒ“ˆ‰“ŒG˜œˆšT—“–›G™ŒŽ–•š

1.4 Channel gain or SER

Abstract — The conventional pilot-aided channel estimation schemes use the fixed number of pilots to estimate the channel. In this paper, the channel estimator exploits reliable decision feedback symbols as quasi-pilots. This new channel estimation scheme is commercially attractive without additional hardware in the receiver using DSP chips for the OFDM systems.

1.2 1 0.8 0.6

›™Œš–“‹

0.4 0.2 0

0

200

400

600 Subcarriers

800

1000

1200

Fig. 1. Relation between channel gain, symbol error rate, and reliable quasi-pilot regions at 10 dB with 1024 subcarriers.

As shown in Fig. 1, the symbol error rate is inversely proportional to the channel gain. Hence, the reliable quasipilots can be extracted in the subcarrier region whose channel gain is greater than the certain threshold. For example, the threshold can be defined as channel gain where symbol error rate is 0.05 at the threshold channel gain. The symbol error rate of reliable quasi-pilots is smaller than 0.05 because the reliable quasi-pilots are extracted based on their channel gain whose magnitude is greater than the threshold. To estimate the channel, the following process is required. In the first place, the CSI is estimated employing the MLCE scheme by the pilot symbols, and this CSI compensates the channel distortion. Next, the detection process for the transmitted symbols is operated. From the decision symbols, the quasi-pilots are extracted based on their reliability using the estimated channel gain. Both the quasi-pilots and the original pilots are exploited to estimate the CSI again using the MLCE method. This proposed method gives more accurate estimated channel and lower bit error rate (BER) than the conventional methods. The block diagram of the proposed

367

scheme is illustrated in Fig. 2, where x is the transmitted symbol and y is the received symbol.  x1

xˆ 1

y

hˆ 1  x(quasi-pilots) x( pilots)

y

hˆ 2

xˆ 2

 x2

the reliable quasi-pilots is defined as the channel gain where 0.05 symbol error rate occurs at that threshold channel gain. Hence, the symbol error rate of reliable quasi-pilots is below 0.05. Fig. 3 shows the mean square error (MSE) of the estimated channel of various methods. All pilot case means that all symbols are considered as pilots. The proposed scheme outperforms the conventional MLCE and the double MLCE methods. In the high SNR region (above the 25 dB), the proposed scheme approaches to the all pilot case, i.e., ideal estimated channel. Fig. 4 shows BER curves with several channel estimation schemes. The proposed scheme shows better results than the ML and double ML schemes. IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Fig. 2. The proposed channel estimation systems.

III. SIMULATION RESULTS Mean Square Error of Channel Estimation

0

10

ML Double ML New proposed scheme All pilot case

-1

10

-2

MSE

10

-3

10

-4

10

-5

10

0

5

10

15 20 Eb/No (SNR per bit)

25

30

Fig. 3. MSE of the estimated channel.

In this paper, we propose a new channel estimation scheme exploiting reliable decision feedback symbols in the OFDM systems over the frequency selective fading channel. The reliability of the decision feedback symbols depends on its error rate. In other words, the reliable symbol has a low symbol error rate. The proposed scheme employs more number of (quasi-)pilot symbols than the conventional MLCE scheme. Differently from the double MLCE method, the reliable quasi-pilot symbols have low error rate with the certain threshold. These two factors improve the channel estimation performance. The simulation results show that the MSE of the estimated channel is better than that of existing methods, and BER of our scheme is lower than that of conventional schemes. The proposed method can be implemented on the DSP chip in the receiver without additional hardware. Hence, it is commercially attractive to any coherent OFDM systems to improve the channel estimation performance with low cost. This compatibility is another benefit of the proposed scheme. REFERENCES

BER Performance

0

10

QPSK with CSI QPSK MLCE using pilots QPSK Double MLCE using pilots New proposed scheme

-1

Bit Error Rate

10

-2

10

-3

10

-4

10

0

5

10

15 20 Eb/No (SNR per bit)

25

30

Fig. 4. BER of the various channel estimation schemes

The HiperLan/2 channel model B is used to generate the channel with its length 16. The total number of subcarriers is 1024 and the number of pilot tones is 16. Each symbol employs QPSK modulation scheme. The threshold to extract

[1] H. Yang, “A road to future broadband wireless access: MIMO-OFDM-Based air interface,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Volume: 43 , Issue: 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 53~60. [2] Z. Wang and G. B. Giannakis, “Wireless multicarrier communications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Volume 17, Issue 3, May 2000 pp. 29~48. [3] R. Van Nee and R. Prasad, “ODFM for wireless multimedia communications,” Artech House Publishers, 2000. [4] M. Morelli and U. Mengali, “A comparison of pilot-aided channel estimation methods for OFDM systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Volume 49, Issue 12, Dec. 2001 pp. 3065~3073. [5] Y. Ma, Y. Huang, N. Yi and F. Liu, “Combined channel estimator for pilot-assisted wireless OFDM communication systems,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC 2004-Spring. IEEE 59th, Volume 4, May, 2004 pp. 1888~1891.

368