1
Supplementary information
2
Noble metal-free bifunctional oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction acidic media electro-
3
catalysts
4
Prasad Prakash Patel1, Moni Kanchan Datta2,3, Oleg I. Velikokhatnyi2,3, Ramalinga Kuruba2,
5
Krishnan Damodaran4, Prashanth Jampani2, Bharat Gattu1, Pavithra Murugavel Shanthi1, Sameer
6
S. Damle1, Prashant N. Kumta1,2,3,5,6*
7
1
8
of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
9
2
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University
Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh,
10
Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
11
3
12
USA.
13
4
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260
14
5
Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Swanson School of Engineering, University of
15
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
16
6
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA.
17
*
Corresponding author: Prof. Prashant N. Kumta (
[email protected])
18
Department of Bioengineering, 815C Benedum Hall, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
19
Tel: +1-412-648-0223, Fax: +1-412-624-3699
Center for Complex Engineered Multifunctional Materials, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261,
20
Table of contents:
21
Section S1: Methanol tolerance test of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Pt/C
22
Section S2: Synthesis of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F via ball-milling
23
Figure S1. SEM micrograph with elemental x-ray maps of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
24
Figure S2. EDX spectrum of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
25
Figure S3. HRTEM image showing lattice fringes with spacing of ~0.249 nm corresponding to
26
the (113) interplanar spacing of cubic Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
27
Figure S4. The XPS spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F showing Cu 2p3/2 peak
28
Figure S5. The XPS spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F showing Mn 2p3/2 peak
29
Figure S6. 19F MAS NMR spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F and
30
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:20F; spinning side bands are marked by asterisks
31
Figure S7. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4
32
Figure S8. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F
33
Figure S9. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
34
Figure S10. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F
35
Figure S11. The polarization curve of chemically synthesized and ball-milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
36
using total loading of 1 mg/cm2 and in-house synthesized IrO2 using total loading of 0.15 mg/cm2
37
obtained in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 400C with a scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction
38
Figure S12. Galvanostatic (constant current) measurement of electrochemical activity of
39
chemically synthesized and ball milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading1 mg/cm2) and in-house
40
synthesized IrO2 (total loading0.15 mg/cm2) performed in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution at
41
400C at a constant current of 2 mA/cm2
42
Figure S13. The Tafel plot (for ORR) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F,
43
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F
44
Figure S14. The polarization curve for ORR of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading 50 g/cm2) at
45
different rotation speeds measured in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 260C with a scan rate
46
of 5 mV/sec
47
Figure S15. The Koutechy-Levich plot for ORR of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F at 0.6 V (vs RHE)
48
Figure S16. The polarization curve of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4
49
solution at 260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction
50
using total loading of 50 g/cm2, with and without 1 M methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte
51
solution
52
Figure S17. The polarization curves of Pt/C obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at
53
260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction using Pt
54
loading of 30 gPt/cm2 for Pt/C, with and without 1 M methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution
55
Figure S18. The polarization curves of chemically synthesized and ball-milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
56
and Pt/C obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm
57
and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction using total loading of 50 g/cm2 for
58
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Pt loading of 30 gPt/cm2 for Pt/C
59
Figure S19. The iRΩ corrected polarization curve of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading 1 mg/cm2)
60
obtained after 24 h of chronoamperometry test in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 400C with a scan rate
61
of 5 mV/sec
62
Figure S20. Theoretical and experimentally measured concentration of O2 gas, measured (for 6 h)
63
during chronoamperometry test of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading1 mg/cm2), performed in 0.5
64
M H2SO4 solution under a constant potential of 1.55 V (vs RHE) at 400C
65
Figure S21. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F measured in N2 saturated 0.5 M
66
H2SO4 at 260C at scan rate of 5 mV/sec using total loading of 50 g/cm2, initial and after 6000
67
cycles
68 69
Section S1: Methanol tolerance test:
70
In DMFCs, methanol cross-over from anode to cathode has detrimental effect on the fuel cell
71
performance due to the undesired reaction with O2 and cathode electro-catalyst.1 Hence, methanol
72
tolerance of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F is studied by conducting polarization studies in O2-saturated (1 M
73
methanol + 0.5 M H2SO4) electrolyte solution at 260C using a scan rate of 5 mV/sec and rotation
74
speed of 2500 rpm employing a total loading of 50 g/cm2 for Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:F. For comparison,
75
methanol tolerance of commercial Pt/C is also studied with Pt loading of 30 gPt/cm2 under
76
identical operating conditions. The polarization curves of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Pt/C with and
77
without presence of methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution are shown in the
78
Supplementary Figs. S17-S18, respectively. The significant increase in overpotential (400 mV)
79
in methanol containing electrolyte solution is observed for Pt/C (Supplementary Fig. S18) mainly
80
due to the competition between ORR and methanol electro-oxidation, which is similar to that
81
reported earlier.2 However, only a minimal increase in overpotential (7 mV) is seen for
82
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F in methanol containing electrolyte solution (Supplementary Fig. S17)
83
suggesting the excellent methanol tolerance of the oxide electro-catalyst which is significantly
84
superior to Pt/C. Hence, we believe Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F is indeed a promising cathode electro-
85
catalyst for ORR in DMFCs.
86 87
Section S2: Synthesis of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F via ball-milling:
88
Mixtures of CuO (Alfa Aesar, 99.5%),MnO (Alfa Aesar, 99.5%) and (NH4F, 98%, Alfa Aesar)
89
corresponding to the stoichiometric composition were subjected to high energy mechanical milling
90
in a high energy shaker mill for 5 h in a stainless steel (SS) vial using 20 SS balls of 2 mm diameter
91
with a ball to powder weight ratio 10:1. The milled powder was then heat treated in air at 5000C
92
for 4 h (Ramp rate=100C/min).
93 94 95 96
97 98 99
Figure S1. SEM micrograph with elemental x-ray maps of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
100 101 102 103
Figure S2. EDX spectrum of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
104 105
Figure S3. HRTEM image showing lattice fringes with spacing of ~0.249 nm corresponding to
106
the (113) interplanar spacing of cubic Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
107 108
109 110 111
Figure S4. The XPS spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F showing Cu 2p3/2 peak
112 113 114 115 116
Figure S5. The XPS spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F showing Mn 2p3/2 peak
117 118
Figure S6. 19F MAS NMR spectra of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F and
119
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:20F; spinning side bands are marked by asterisks
120
121 122 123
Figure S7. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4
124 125 126
Figure S8. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F
127 128 129
Figure S9. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
130 131 132 133
Figure S10. The Tafel plot (for OER) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F
134 135
Figure S11. The polarization curve of chemically synthesized and ball-milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
136
using total loading of 1 mg/cm2 and in-house synthesized IrO2 using total loading of 0.15
137
mg/cm2 obtained in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 400C with a scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ
138
correction
139
140 141
Figure S12. Galvanostatic (constant current) measurement of electrochemical activity of
142
chemically synthesized and ball milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading1 mg/cm2) and in-house
143
synthesized IrO2 (total loading0.15 mg/cm2) performed in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte solution at
144
400C at a constant current of 2 mA/cm2
145
146 147
Figure S13. The Tafel plot (for ORR) after iR correction of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4, Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:5F,
148
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:15F
149
150 151
Figure S14. The polarization curve for ORR of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading 50 g/cm2) at
152
different rotation speeds measured in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 260C with a scan rate
153
of 5 mV/sec
154
155 156 157
Figure S15. The Koutechy-Levich plot for ORR of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F at 0.6 V (vs RHE)
158 159
Figure S16. The polarization curve of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4
160
solution at 260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction
161
using total loading of 50 g/cm2, with and without 1 M methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte
162
solution
163
164 165
Figure S17. The polarization curves of Pt/C obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at
166
260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction using Pt
167
loading of 30 gPt/cm2 for Pt/C, with and without 1 M methanol in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte
168
solution
169
170 171
Figure S18. The polarization curves of chemically synthesized and ball-milled Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F
172
and Pt/C obtained in O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 260C with rotation speed of 2500 rpm
173
and scan rate of 5 mV/sec after iRΩ correction using total loading of 50 g/cm2 for
174
Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F and Pt loading of 30 gPt/cm2 for Pt/C
175
176 177
Figure S19. The iRΩ corrected polarization curve of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading 1
178
mg/cm2) obtained after 24 h of chronoamperometry test in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 400C with a
179
scan rate of 5 mV/sec
180
181 182
Figure S20. Theoretical and experimentally measured concentration of O2 gas, measured (for 6
183
h) during chronoamperometry test of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F (total loading1 mg/cm2), performed in
184
0.5 M H2SO4 solution under a constant potential of 1.55 V (vs RHE) at 400C
185
186 187
Figure S21. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) of Cu1.5Mn1.5O4:10F measured in N2 saturated 0.5
188
M H2SO4 at 260C at scan rate of 5 mV/sec using total loading of 50 g/cm2, initial and after 6000
189
cycles
190 191 192 193 194 195 196
197
References:
198 199 200
1.
Lee K, Zhang L, Zhang J. Ir x Co 1− x (x= 0.3–1.0) alloy electrocatalysts, catalytic activities, and methanol tolerance in oxygen reduction reaction. Journal of Power Sources 170, 291-296 (2007).
2.
Wang D, et al. Facile Synthesis of Carbon-Supported Pd–Co Core–Shell Nanoparticles as Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts and Their Enhanced Activity and Stability with Monolayer Pt Decoration. Chemistry of Materials 24, 2274-2281 (2012).
201 202 203 204 205 206