NPS10 [Compatibility Mode]

3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Nov 9, 2010 - Terpene Thermal Rearrangement ... Highly functionalized molecules: building blocks for fine ... Linalool: used in flavor/fragrance industry,.
Terpene Thermal Rearrangement Chemistry : a Kinetic Study Nick M. Vandewiele, Kevin M. Van Geem, Marie-Françoise Reyniers, Guy B. Marin

Laboratory for Chemical Technology, Ghent University http://www.lct.UGent.be

Terpenes / Terpenoids • Oligomers of isoprene • Highly functionalized molecules: building blocks for fine chemicals Isoprene • Stereo-isomerism / chirality : flavour/odor-active components • Occurence in the extractives of biomass, e.g. Pines • Source of volatile organic compounds, green house gases

Limonene

Steroid skeleton

Vitamin A

9 november 2010 Eur JOC 2006, 15, 3317

2

Industrial Production Kraft pulping process • Wood chips conversion into cellulosic fibers • Crude Sulfate Turpentine (CST), byproduct stream, highly concentrated in pinenes (~90%) CST

9 november 2010

3

Industrial terpenes • Acyclic functionalized terpenes are of industrial importance • Acyclic compounds obtained via rearrangement of bicyclic isomers • Industrial route: gas phase thermal isomerization, relevant due to high selectivity (~80%)

Gajewski et al., Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6943 9 november 2010

Lemée et al., Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 1313

Ohloff et al., Tetrahedron 1962, 18,37

4

2-Pinanol rearrangement into linalool • Linalool: used in flavor/fragrance industry, precursor of vitamin A • Cis- & trans-2-pinanol, diastereomers: available for experiments • 2-pinanol-to-linalool: last step in route from biomass (pinenes) to linalool

Cis-2-pinanol

Trans-2-pinanol

Can we model the behaviour and mutual differences between the diastereomers in terms of elementary 9 november 2010 reactions?

5

Experiments • Isothermal plug flow reactor (4mm ID, • Methane dilution: 64 1.47m length) & 89 mol% CH4 • 59 experiments (35 cis , 24 trans) • Conversion: 7 – 97 % • Analysis: GC + FID (off• T: 485 – 590 °C line sampling) • P: 120 & 440 kPa

9 november 2010

6

2-Pinanol chemistry: linalool route Linalool H3 C

H3C

OH

Plinol H3 C

OH

OH CH

C H3C H3 C

Cis-2-pinanol

OH

Plinol isomers: lumped

CH3 CH3

Stepwise cyclobutane fragmentation Concerted fragmentation (Woodward-Hoffmann) 9 november 2010

CH3

Pericyclic ene cyclization: concerted reaction through 6membered transition state

7

Side-routes Linalool H3C

H3C

Plinol

OH

H 3C

OH

OH CH H3C OH C

H 3C H3C

Cis-2-pinanol

CH3

OH

CH3

[1,5]H-shift

H 3C

Cis-β-terpineol

CH3

O

CH3 CH3

Alternative cyclobutane fragmentation

CH3

H3 C OH CH3 C CH3

H3C

OH

OH

Retro-ene

CH

Isolinalool 9 november 2010

H3C

Not observed Ene 8 cyclization

Stereo-aspects Plinol

Linalool H3C

H3 C

OH

OH

H 3C

OH CH H3 C

OH

C H 3C

H 3C

Trans-2-pinanol

CH3

Stereo-aspects of ene-cyclization not taken into account

OH

Trans-β-terpineol

H3 C

O

CH3

CH3 CH3

CH3 H 3C

OH CH3 CH3

C CH3 CH

H 3C

OH

H 3C

OH

Isolinalool 9 november 2010

9

Reactivity / Selectivity Differences Cis-2-pinanol more selective towards linalool than trans-2pinanol

Cis-2-pinanol more reactive than trans-2-pinanol 9 november 2010

Vandewiele et al., submitted to J. of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2010

10

Kinetic modelling: methodology Only elementary reactions considered

Pre-exponential factors fixed to literature values, equal in both models Activation energies estimated Thermodynamic consistency applied Calculated from TD properties of species via Benson group additivity scheme

9 november 2010

11

Kinetic models: results H3 C

OH

H3C

OH

Cis-2Pinanol H3C

OH CH H 3C OH C

H3C

H3C

OH

CH 3

CH3 CH3

H3C OH CH 3 C CH3 CH

H3 C

OH

H3 C

OH

H3 C

O

CH3 CH3

Trans-2Pinanol

CH3

Kinetic models: good agreement with experimental data for all response 12 variables

9 november 2010

Cyclobutane Fragmentation A = 1014 s-1

Ea (kJ/mol)

Cis

206±2

Trans

211±2

Linalool H3C

OH CH

C H3C

H3C

OH

Small Δ Ea : reactivity, selectivity difference

CH 3

CH3 CH3

H3C OH CH 3 C CH3

A = 1014 s-1

Ea (kJ/mol)

Cis

225±2

Trans

225±2

9 november 2010

CH

H

13

Biradical Rearrangements H3 C

OH

A = 1013.8 s-1 Ea (kJ/mol)

H3C

Cis

88±6

Trans

88±6

OH CH H 3C OH

A = 1011.2 s-1 Ea (kJ/mol)

C H3C

H3C

OH

CH 3

Cis

67±6

Trans

67±6

CH3 CH3

H3C OH CH 3 C CH3 CH

9 november 2010

H3 C

OH

Same kinetics for both models despite connectivity & stereodifferences 14

Pericyclic Ene - cyclizations H3 C

OH

H 3C OH

H3C

OH

A = 108 s-1

Ea (kJ/mol)

Cis

122±2

Trans

122±2

Ene – cyclizations: Same kinetics for both reactions

CH 3 C CH3

H3 C

OH

H3 C

OH

H3 C

O

CH3 CH3

9 november 2010

Fast  invisible

CH3

15

Conclusion • Kinetic models: – Elementary reactions – Describe chemistry and kinetics of cis/trans 2-pinanol

• Reactivity and selectivity disparities: – Determined by one elementary reaction

• Substituents of the bicycloheptane system – influence initial cyclobutane fragmentation – negligible effect on downstream reactions  Generalization to other terpenes?

9 november 2010

16

Acknowledgements • Aäron Vandeputte • Special Research Fund UGent B/10681/02 – BOF09/DOC/374 • Long Term Structural Methusalem Funding by the Flemish Government - grant number BOF09/01M00409. • Fund for Scientic Research - Flanders (FWO)

17

Questions?

9 november 2010

18

Backup: generalization Mechanism: Substituents of the bicycloheptane system have little or no influence on isomerization chemistry of thermal rearrangements

OH O

HO

O OH

OH

OH HO

HO

Kinetics: Substituents of the bicycloheptane system influence the initial cyclobutane fragmentation, but have no influence on downstream reactions? 9 november 2010

19

Backup: kinetic parameters Table 1: Pre-exponential factors and fitted activation energies for the two possible cyclobutane rupture reactions (A and B), for the biradical rearrangements (C, D and E), for the ene cyclizations (F and G) and the retro-ene reaction (H) used in the kinetic models of cis- and trans-2-pinanol

Reaction

Cis-2-pinanol Log10A (s-1)

Ea (kJ mol-1)*

A B C D E

14.0 14.0 13.8 11.2 13.8

206±2 225±2 88±6 67±6 88†

F G H

Log10 A (s-1) 8.0 8.0 11.3

Trans-2-pinanol Log10A Ea (kJ mol-1)* (s-1) 14.0 211±2 14.0 225±2 13.8 88±6 11.2 67±6 13.8 88† Ea (kJ mol-1) 122±2 122±2 100#

*

95% confidence level



Kinetic parameters of the subsequent biradical rearrangement E were taken equal to the fitted parameters of

the analogous rearrangement reaction C #Kinetic parameter not estimated

9 november 2010

20

Duplication of reaction channels

Ohloff et al., Tetrahedron 1962, 18,37

9 november 2010

21

Kinetic models: results

5

90

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

3

40

100

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

Kinetic models: good agreement with experimental data for all response variables

80 70 60 50 40 30

30

20

10

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

20

2

1

10

4

0

0 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

3

2

10

20

30

40

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Linalool

Cis-2-pinanol

1

100

0

1

2

3

0

1

2

3

4

5

Isolinalool

B-terpineols Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

5

Ketone compound

4

80 70 60 50 40 30

30

20

10

20 3

10 0

0 0

2

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Trans-2-pinanol

1

9 november 2010

40

90

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

0

Reconstructed weight fraction (%)

0

100

0

10

20

30

Analytical weight fraction (%)

Plinol 22

0 0

1

2

3

4

Analytical weight fraction (%)

5

40