Nr. 28 (2/2011) - Universitatea din Craiova

A

n

a

l

e

l

e

Universităţii din Craiova S e r i a:

Filosofie Nr. 28 (2/2011)

ANNALES DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE CRAIOVA – SERIE DE PHILOSOPHIE, nr. 28 (2⁄2011) 13 rue Al. I. Cuza, Craiova ROUMANIE On fait des échanges des publications avec des institutions similaires du pays et de l‘étranger ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA – PHILOSOPHY SERIES, nr. 28(2⁄2011 Al. I. Cuza street, no. 13, Craiova ROMANIA We exchange publications with similar institutions of our country and abroad Editor-in-Chief : Adriana Neacşu, University of Craiova Editorial Board: Anton Adămuţ, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi Alexandru Boboc, Romanian Academy Giuseppe Cacciatore, University of Naples Federico II Giuseppe Cascione, University of Bari Teodor Dima, Romanian Academy Gabriella Farina, Università di Roma III Ştefan Viorel Ghenea, University of Craiova Vasile Muscă, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca

Niculae Mătăsaru, University of Craiova Adrian Niţă, University of Craiova Ionuţ Răduică, University of Craiova Vasile Sălan, University of Craiova Giovanni Semeraro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Alexandru Surdu, Romanian Academy Tibor Szabó, University of Szeged Cristinel Nicu Trandafir, University of Craiova Gheorghe Vlăduţescu, Romanian Academy

Secretar de redacţie: Cătălin Stănciulescu Responsabil de număr: Adriana Neacşu

ISSN 1841-8325 e-mail: [email protected] webpage: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/analele_universitatii/filosofie/ Tel./Fax: +40-(0)-251-418515 This publication is present in Philosopher‘s Index (USA), in European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH, Philosophy) and meets on the list of scientific magazines established by l‘Agence d‘évaluation de la recherche et de l‘enseignement supérieur (AERES)

CUPRINS ISTORIA FILOSOFIEI CHRISTOPHER VASILLOPULOS

Euripides and Socrates Nietzsche’s unnatural enemies Part II

5

GEORGE BONDOR

Metafizică şi fenomenologie în gândirea lui Hegel

15

ION TĂNĂSESCU

Categoriile mereologiei brentaniene

32

FILOSOFIE ROM]NEASCĂ 47 ANTON ADĂMUȚ

De la intuiționism și fenomenologie la substanțialism ANA BAZAC

Existența tragică la D. D. Roșca și Emil Cioran

64

CĂTĂLIN CIOABĂ

Devenire fără timp. Câțiva pași de la Heidegger la Noica și înapoi

81

ESTETICĂ ȘI FILOSOFIE SOCIAL-POLITICĂ CLAUDE KARNOOUH

L’artiste, le poète, le penseur et le Politique au XX e siècle ou le radicalisme de l’engagement

99

BRICE POREAU

La reconnaissance du génocide: l'exemple de Jean-Paul Sartre

120

LOGICĂ ȘI ONTOLOGIE MARC PEETERS

Le problème des définitions dans l’Ecole de Lwow- Varsovie. Lesniewski versus Kant

129

VLAD VASILE ANDREICA

Critica kantiană a argumentului ontologic şi depăşirea acesteia din perspectiva conceptului de existență necesară

147

Analele universităţii din Craiova - S e r i a F i l o s o f i e • 28 (2/2011)

4

FILOSOFIA RELIGIEI HERBERT HRACHOVEC

Heilige, Avatare und Übermenschen

158

ADRIANA NEACȘU

Explicația în teologie

174 FILOSOFIE APLICATĂ

ANTONIO SANDU

Un model afirmativ-apreciativ în Consilierea filosofică

203

AUTORS/CONTRIBUTORS

223

CONTENTS

225

EURIPIDES AND SOCRATES NIETZSCHE’S UNNATURAL ENEMIES Part II CHRISTOPHER VASILLOPULOS1 Abstract: In Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche sees in Euripides the destroyer of tragedy. In the process of condemning Euripides, Nietzsche also caricatures Socrates, the ‘demon logician.’ Accusing Euripides of being the ‘mask’ of Socrates, Nietzsche conjures up an anti-tragic monstrosity, the twin ‘spectators,’ Euripides/Socrates, who in tandem ushered in the Age of Rationalism, including its anti-poetic horrors, including the twentieth century’s global wars, which he prophetically anticipates. Contending that Nietzsche intentionally distorts the two Greeks, this paper offers an interpretation of his thought which may account for his attacks. Keywords: Nietzsche, Euripides, Socrates, Greek Tragedy.

-----Words are only metaphors; indeed, they are doubly metaphorical: `One designates only the relations of things to man, and to express them, one calls on the boldest of metaphors. A nerve stimulus, first transposed into an image —the first metaphor. The image, in turn, imitated by a sound—second metaphor.' Nietzsche, On Truth, I 2 IV. Sabotaging the Socratic Logic Machine Nietzsche is no more trying to present an accurate portrait of Socrates than of Euripides. Not only are they metaphors in the sense that all words are metaphorical, they are metaphors in the sense that neither ‘Socrates’ nor ‘Euripides’ signify men that once lived in fifth century Athens. They signify all that is anti-tragic. As Knight says, ‘Socrates is the perfect example