Personality profiles in patients with alcohol ...

1 downloads 0 Views 180KB Size Report
congruencies/differences in self/informant scores of personality profiles in alcohol dependent patients with and without comorbid personality pathology.
Personality profiles in patients with alcohol dependence and relapse - Congruencies and differences in self and informant scores Authors - Soundarya Soundararajan, Gitanjali Narayanan, Pratima Murthy RESULTS Shouldnt you mention affiliations? Personality assessments form important aspects in alcohol use Spearmann correlations between self and informant Mention N; no99 need of with 34.3%

INTRODUCTION m an importnat aspect of evaluation

disorders. Studies examining the association between personality traits and comorbid personality pathologies in alcohol dependence are limited. We aimed at identifying congruencies/differences in self/informant scores of personality profiles in alcohol dependent patients with and without comorbid personality pathology.

RESEARCH QUESTION Do patients with alcohol dependence perceive themselves differently from their significant others particularly when there is a personality pathology?

METHODS

Participants

with mean age 37(±8.42) years

Patients with personality disorders Informant Self N=31 scores

NEO-PI-R (Revised NEO Personality Inventory) and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ) Assessed for relapse/abstinence at 3 months

Statistical Analysis was performed using R software. Paired-t and Spearman correlations were used to compute differences between scores and correlations.

abstainers

Self scores were significantly higher among patients with personality disorders

Facets

P value

E4-Activity

Correlation coefficient (r) 0.204

E6-Positive Emotions

0.205

0.042

O5-Ideas

0.223

0.027

A5-Modesty

0.247

0.014

65.7% relapsers

No significant differences noted between the self/informants in the domains/facets of NEO-P-R at baseline/treatment outcome

scores

Adult participants with alcohol dependence(DSM-IV)

82.8% followed up at 3 months

scores

0.042

Patients without personality disorders Personality disorders (by PDQ) InformantN=68 Self scores

Paranoid, histrionic, anti-social, obsessive-compulsive, schizoid, narcissistic, negativistic, suspicious, schizotypal

NEO-PI-R DOMAINS Neuroticism Extraversion Openness to experience Agreeableness Conscientiousness

scores

Informant scores were higher in patients without any personality disorders

On which facets were there significant differences Was it uniformly on all domains/or with specific PDs DISCUSSION Though patients with alcohol dependence did not differ in their personality scores when compared with scoring of immediate family member, the congruence reached significance only in a few facets of the five factor model. There was significant agreement especially in the domains of extraversion(E4,E6) Openness and agreeableness. Our study alsoconclusion suggests that when a comorbid pathology, patients says rate themselves across So all domains. Thethe reliability of the self scoring Your only there talksisof patientspersonality with PD. As Gitanjali it is truehigher for both. perhaps conclusion becomes questionable in thisinformation regard. is that collateral from significant othersCONCLUSION may provide a more balanced understanding of personality

assessment and management Our study suggests that as patients with alcohol dependence and a comorbid is personality disorder tend to rate themselves higher across all domains of the five factor model, careful attention should be given in assessing and treating them.