Probiotics and Nonalcoholic Fatty liver Disease - BioMedSearch

Review Article

129

Probiotics and Nonalcoholic Fatty liver Disease Tannaz Eslamparast1, Sareh Eghtesad2, Azita Hekmatdoost3, Hossein Poustchi2*

1.

2.

3.

National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran Digestive Diseases Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Clinical Nutrition and Diet Therapy, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology, Research Institute Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

ABSTRACT Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, both in adults and in children. NAFLD represents a spectrum of liver diseases that range from hepatic steatosis to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. However, NAFLD is more prevalent in overweight and obese individuals. Evidences thus far suggest that hepatic triglyceride accumulation is not always derived from obesity; gut microbiota can also play a role in the development of insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, necroinflammation and fibrosis. On the other hand, probiotics can strengthen the intestinal wall, reducing its permeability, bacterial translocation, and endotoxemia according to animal and human studies. They can also reduce oxidative and inflammatory liver damage, while improving the histological state in certain situations. This review article focuses on research that has been conducted on probiotics and NAFLD, highlighting their efficacy as a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of this condition. KEYWORDS Probiotics; Nonalcoholic fatty liver; cirrhosis Please cite this paper as: Eslamparast T, Eghtesad S, Hekmatdoost A, Poustchi H. Probiotics and Nonalcoholic Fatty liver Disease. Middle East J Dig Dis 2013;5:129-36.

INTRODUCTION

*

Corresponding Author: Hossein Poustchi, MD, PhD Digestive Diseases Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Tel: +98 21 82415300 Fax:+98 21 82415400 Email: [email protected] Received: 10 Apr. 2013 Accepted: 27 Jun. 2013

“Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease, becoming a serious public health concern, as a result of the obesity epidemic, unhealthy dietary patterns, and sedentary lifestyles.1,2 NAFLD represents a wide spectrum of conditions associated with the deposition of fat in the liver, that ranges from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis.3,4 The pathogenesis of NAFLD is unclear. Initial theories regarding its development have been based on the ‘2-hit hypothesis’, where the “first hit” involves hepatic lipid accumulation, and insulin resistance is proposed to be the key contributing factor for steatosis development.5 Oxidative stress followed by lipid peroxidation, as well as the action of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α), adipokines and mitochondrial dysfunction initiate the second hit, which progresses from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).6-10 In a recent review article, Dowman et al.

Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

130

Probiotics and NAFLD

have referred to a further component, or a ‘third hit’ which also plays a role in NAFLD pathogenesis. This “third hit” is also caused by oxidative stress, which inhibits the replication of mature hepatocytes resulting in the over population of the hepatic oval cells.11 The existing treatment strategies for NAFLD have already focused on reducing metabolic risk factors, with lifestyle modification techniques such as weight loss through diet and exercise, as the key therapy,12,13 as well as pharmacotherapy, and the use of hepato-protective agents such as antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory drugs, to protect the liver from further damage.14-17 Many of these strategies have been shown effective in different pilot studies.18 However, since there is sometimes no relationship between liver histology and serum levels of liver enzymes, the results of trials that use biochemical markers of liver injury as study end points need to be interpreted carefully, especially when there is no control group used in the study design.19,20 An endogenous factor contributing to NAFLD development is gut microbiota.21 Recently, it has been reported that NAFLD might be linked to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), which induces liver injury by gut-derived lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and TNF- α production.22 It has been suggested that gut microbiota increases the liver’s exposure to endotoxins, thus promoting steatohepatitis.22 Possible mechanisms as described by Solga and Diehl include “bacterial overgrowth, release of the LPS constituent of the gram-negative bacteria, and impaired intestinal barrier integrity, resulting in increased endotoxin absorption”.10 Thus, it seems that the manipulation of enteric flora may be a novel therapeutic strategy in the management of NAFLD. Probiotics can modulate the gut flora and influence the gut-liver axis. Available data indicates that probiotics may promote the intestinal mucosal barrier function and mucosal recovery during a pathological condition.23 Because of the close anatomical and functional relationship between the gut and the liver, and the immunoregulatory effects of probiotics, the aim of this review article is to sumMiddle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

marize the use of probiotics in NAFLD, specifically focusing on the probiotics’ mechanisms of action, and highlighting their efficacy as a novel therapeutic option to treat this condition. Gut-liver axis The gut and the liver are closely associated, forming the gut-liver axis.22 The interplay in this axis depends on two things: an intact intestine and a liver that is well-able to handle immunologic responses as well as the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous compounds.22,24 The intestinal mucosa serves as a defense barrier that helps prevent the entrance and the systemic spread of bacteria and endotoxins, most of which are LPS from the cell walls of gramnegative bacteria.25 However, under certain conditions, this intestinal barrier fails, resulting in bacterial and endotoxin invasion into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, after which the pathogens reach systemic organs and tissues; this process is termed bacterial translocation.26 There is also some evidence that a small degree of endotoxemia of gut origin is usually present in the portal circulation (which drains the GI tract), serving as the ideal route of transportation to the liver, for the intestinal bacteria and bacterial products such as LPS. But under normal conditions, this endotoxemia is rapidly cleared by the liver’s reticuloendothelial system.27-30 However, at times of liver disease, or with long-term exposure of the liver to LPS, which are hepatotoxins, a cascade of morphological and functional changes start in the liver, inducing an acute inflammatory response and a build-up of the polymorphonuclear cells.31 Neutrophils then release reactive oxygen metabolites, proteases and other enzymes from the granules, with a worsening of liver damage.31 Because of these factors, the modification of the gut microbiota to treat NAFLD, has produced growing interest in the potential for the use of probiotics as an effective dietary treatment.32 Probiotics Probiotics were originally defined as “microorganisms causing growth of other microorganisms”, and later on as “live microorganisms which when

Eslamparast et al. consumed in adequate amounts, result in healthy benefits to the host”.33 A microorganism is considered to be probiotic when it meets the following conditions: it should be of human origin, non-pathogenic, should highly resist passing through the intestine, should have the ability to adhere to mucus while preventing the adherence of other pathogenic microorganisms, and should be beneficial to the immune system and human health in general.34 Probiotics have been suggested as a treatment for the prevention of chronic liver damage, because they prevent bacterial translocation and epithelial invasion, and also inhibit bacterial mucosal adherence, and the production of antimicrobial peptides, while decreasing inflammation, and stimulation of host immunity.35,36 Probiotics and inflammation Inflammation can develop as a result of both internal and external factors. The most important triggers for inflammation occur when microorganisms are present at locations where they do not belong. The aggressiveness of the pathogenic bacteria can weaken the barrier function of the mucosa and allow penetration of bacterial components into the body. “These components then end up in the liver, and the liver responds with inflammation”.37 Probiotics confer a health benefit to the host by different conceivable mechanisms such as decreasing the invasion of proinflammatory agents from the gut into the body. Bacterial phagocytosis and clearance most extensively occur in the liver and by macrophages called Kupffer cells.38 According to Racanelli and Rehermann, these Kupffer cells, when exposed to LPS or other bacterial products such as lipopeptides, unmethylated DNA, and double stranded RNA, mediate an inflammatory response via pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, all of which impact liver tissue, causing injury.38 As Su explains, these microbial products start proinflammatory actions by mediating through a specific class of receptors, termed Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs detect signature molecules derived from pathogens and enable the host to regulate innate immune responses.39 TLRs are expressed in many different hepatic cell Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

131

types including Kupffer cells, hepatocytes, and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). The extraordinarily powerful effects of TLRs on inflammation and their expression in the liver as well as the hepatic exposure to TLR ligands from the intestine, suggest that TLRs act as an important link between hepatic inflammation, injury, and fibrosis. The intestinal microbiota and TLRs represent a major link between inflammation and wound-healing responses in the liver. Among the many different TLRs, TLR4 has a prominent role in promoting inflammation and injury in conditions such as alcoholic liver disease and NASH.39 TLR4 associates with CD14 on the cell surface to initiate LPS-induced signal transduction, notably, activation of nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and the subsequent production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and cyclooxygenase 2.39,40 As explained by Baldwin, the activation of TLR4 by LPS triggers an essential intracellular inflammatory cascade, includes stress-activated and mitogen-activated protein kinases, c-Jun-N- terminal kinase, p38 and the NFκB pathway. Elimination of the inhibitor of NFκB kinase subunit β (IKK-β), allows NFκB to translocate to the nucleus, where it causes the expression of genes involved in certain inflammatory pathways, producing TNF-α and IL-1β.41 Probiotics have several anti-inflammatory effects that can contribute to their clinical benefits in NAFLD.10 Based on explanations by various researchers, these effects include their competition with pathogenic bacteria for limited nutrients,23 the modification of inflammatory pathways induced by intestinal bacterial overgrowth via alteration of cytokine signaling,42 the amelioration of intestinal barrier function through modulation of cytoskeletal and tight junction proteins,43,44 enhancement of the integrity of the intestinal epithelium by providing essential nutrients particularly in the form of medium-chain fatty acids that inhibit apoptosis, direct inhibition of the production of proinflammatory mediators such as TNF-α,45 induction of anti-inflammatory responses in intestinal epithelial cell–leukocyte cocultures,46 and stimulation of IgA release.47 The role of probiotics in insulin resistance

132


Insulin resistance seems to have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and NASH.48 Besides the suggested role of insulin resistance in the development of steatosis, hepatic insulin resistance can promote hepatocyte injury and inflammation. Gut flora and gut derived endotoxemia are involved in the development of insulin resistance, especially through the LPS–TLR 4–monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 system.45,49-52 Although this evidence has been largely derived from animal models, one study documented elevated plasma levels of LPS among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to matched controls.53 Suppression or modification of SIBO, causing a reduction in proinflammatory cytokine production, leads to a fall in fasting insulin concentrations and decreased insulin resistance.45,54 Administration of probiotics has been shown to lower blood glucose levels by an insulin-independent mechanism in a diabetic rat model.55 Probiotics as an option for anti-fibrotic therapy Chronic liver injury is characterized by fibrosis development in the liver, since repeated and continuous damage to the liver cells causes HSC activation, which are recognized as the main matrix producing cells in liver fibrosis.56 Through an increased portal delivery of endotoxins, intestinal bacteria seem to be able to produce fibrotic liver disease via the activation of Kuppfer cells, induction of TGF-β production and subsequent activation of HSCs. Besides being the main precursors of myofibroblasts, the HSCs are also the “predominant targets through which TLR4 ligands promote fibrogenesis”.37,57 HSCs may also have an important role in generating the liver inflammatory cascade associated with endotoxemia.58,59 TLR4 is expressed, not only on Kupffer cells, but also on HSCs; while Kupffer cells contribute to fibrogenesis through the production of proinflammatory and profibrogenic mediators, HSCs are, as stated, the major source of the extracellular matrix deposited in the fibrotic process.56 Activated HSCs are highly responsive to LPS through a TLR4-dependent pathway.56,59 In HSCs, LPS induces IL-8 and CC-motif chemokine Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

2 production and activates the transcription factors NFκB and c-Jun (now known as transcription factor aP1) through TLR4, indicating that LPSs exert direct effects on HSCs during fibrogenesis.59 Probiotics in NAFLD in animal studies Several animal models have provided evidence that probiotics may reduce NAFLD progression.45,60-63 A study using a type of VSL#3 mixture of three types of bacteria (Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus) for 4 weeks in ob/ob mice showed a reduction in hepatic total fatty acid content and liver inflammation as well as an improvement in hepatic insulin resistance.45 Another study suggested a direct decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines via the down-regulation of NF-κB activity using probiotic treatments.60 In a NAFLD animal model fed a high fat diet (HFD), VSL#3 supplementation reduced the expression of lipid peroxidation markers, TNF-α, iNOS and cyclooxygenase 2 as compared to the control group.62 Furthermore, the administration of VSL#3 improved insulin resistance in liver and adipose tissues and counteracted the development of NASH and atherosclerosis in ApoE(−/−) genetically dyslipidemic mice.64 Recently, it was shown that oral Bifidobacterium supplementation in mice with HFD induced-NASH attenuated hepatic fat accumulation without improvement of intestinal permeability. Histological aspects of the liver showed microvesicular steatosis with basically normal hepatic lobules in the Bifidobacterium group compared to the high-fat fed mice, where the structure of the hepatic lobule was destroyed and was associated with micro and macrovesicular steatosis.65 Only one study assessed the effects of probiotics in liver fibrosis.63 In a methionine choline-deficient (MCD) diet induced mouse model of NASH, Velayudham et al showed that the administration of VSL#3 reduced the progression of liver fibrosis by diminishing the accumulation of collagen and α-smooth muscle actin, but without significant attenuation of steatosis or inflammation. A decrease in the expression of procollagen I α1 and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) was observed in mice fed MCD + VSL#3 as compared to those fed

Eslamparast et al.

133

the MCD diet alone.63 Velayudham et al. demonstrated that VSL#3 administration inhibited fibrosis by triggering the production of pseudoreceptor Bambi. Thus, in the presence of VSL#3, high levels of Bambi could prevent TGF- β-induced signals to release, and control the unrestricted activation of HSCs due to ongoing inflammation.63 This study suggested that VSL#3 may improve fibrosis. Several strains of lactobacillus have demonstrated a protective effect on NAFLD,66-68 whereas a recent meta-analysis pointed out the association of certain species (L. fermentum and L. ingluviei) with weight gain.69

tively or qualitatively. Probiotics are safe, inexpensive and have no known adverse effects with longterm use, and supplementation with probiotics in the management of NAFLD/NASH seems to be a practical therapeutic strategy. Since different probiotic strains may have different effects, further understanding of the diverse functions of the various strains as well as their effects on different diseases is required.

Probiotics in NAFLD in human studies Preliminary data showed that both VSL#3 and a synbiotic (combination of pro/prebiotics) given to NAFLD patients for two to three months, improved liver enzyme levels, TNF-α and oxidative stress markers.70 More recently, two randomized double blind placebo controlled studies, showed a significant decrease in liver aminotransferases with probiotic administration in children71 and in adults.72 Malaguarnera et al. also demonstrated that oral administration of B. longum with fructo-oligosaccharides, combined with lifestyle modification, ameliorated the serum profile of aspartate aminotransferase, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TNF-α and endotoxins, while improving insulin resistance, steatosis and the NASH activity index.73 These promising results are strongly indicative of a great benefit to use probiotics in the treatment of NAFLD. Nonetheless, as stated in a Cochrane meta-analysis, larger randomized studies are still needed.74

REFERENCES

CONCLUSION Given the evidences described above regarding the possible fundamental role of gut-derived microbial factors in the development and/or progression of NAFLD, a logical proposition is that the modification of intestinal microbiota may have a beneficial effect on this pathological condition. Complications of liver disease could potentially be reduced by altering the microbiota either quantitaMiddle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.

1.

Björnsson E. The clinical aspects of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2008;54:7-18.

2.

Angulo P. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1221-31.

3.

Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, NeuschwanderTetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2467-74.

4.

Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, Charlton M,et al The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 2012;142:1592-609.

5.

Day C. Pathogenesis of steatohepatitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002;16:663-78.

6.

Farrell GC, Larter CZ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology 2006;43:S99-S112.

7.

McCullough AJ. Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40 Suppl 1:S17-29.

8.

Duvnjak M, Lerotić I, Barsić N, Tomasić V, Virović Jukić L, Velagić V. Pathogenesis and management issues for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:4539-50.

9.

Kojima H, Sakurai S, Uemura M, Fukui H, Morimoto H, Tamagawa Y. Mitochondrial abnormality and oxidative stress in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007;31:S61-6.

10. Solga SF, Diehl A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: lumen–liver interactions and possible role for probiotics. J Hepatol 2003;38:681-7. 11. Dowman JK, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN. Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. QJM 2010;103:71-83. 12. Hickman I, Jonsson J, Prins J, Ash S, Purdie D, Clouston

134


A, et al. Modest weight loss and physical activity in overweight patients with chronic liver disease results in sustained improvements in alanine aminotransferase, fasting insulin, and quality of life. Gut 2004;53:413-9. 13. Huang MA, Greenson JK, Chao C, Anderson L, Peterman D, Jacobson J, et al. One-year intense nutritional counseling results in histological improvement in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1072-81. 14. Masterton G, Plevris J, Hayes P. Review article: omega-3 fatty acids–a promising novel therapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:67992. 15. Harrison SA, Torgerson S, Hayashi P, Ward J, Schenker S. Vitamin E and vitamin C treatment improves fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2485-90. 16. Merat S, Malekzadeh R, Sohrabi MR, Sotoudeh M, Rakhshani N, Sohrabpour AA, et al. Probucol in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a double-blind randomized controlled study. J Hepatol 2003;38:414-8. 17. Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Heathcote EJ, Harrison ME, Jorgensen R, Angulo P, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of a randomized trial. Hepatology 2004;39:770-8. 18. Emel Pamuk G, Sonsuz A. N-Acetylcysteine in The Treatment Of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:1220-1. 19. Fassio E, Álvarez E, Domínguez N, Landeira G, Longo C. Natural history of nonalcoholic steathepatitis: A longitudinal study of repeat liver biopsies. Hepatology 2004;40:8206. 20. Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol 2005;42:132-8. 21. Farrell G. Is bacterial ash the flash that ignites NASH? Gut 2001;48:148-9. 22. Loguercio C, De Simone T, Federico A, Terracciano F, Tuccillo C, Di Chicco M, et al. Gut-liver axis: a new point of attack to treat chronic liver damage? Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2144-6. 23. Iacono A, Raso GM, Canani RB, Calignano A, Meli R. Probiotics as an emerging therapeutic strategy to treat NAFLD: focus on molecular and biochemical mechanisms. J Nutr Biochem 2011;22:699-711. 24. Zeuzem S. Gut-liver axis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000;15:5982. 25. Laflamme N, Rivest S. Toll-like receptor 4: the missing link of the cerebral innate immune response triggered by circulating gram-negative bacterial cell wall components. FASEB J 2001;15:155-63. 26. Berg RD, Garlington AW. Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenMiddle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

teric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Infect Immun 1979;23:403-11. 27. Jacob A, Goldberg P, Bloom N, Degenshein G, Kozinn P. Endotoxin and bacteria in portal blood. Gastroenterology 1977;72:1268. 28. Nolan JP. Endotoxin, reticuloendothelial function, and liver injury. Hepatology 1981;1:458-65 29. Mathison JC, Ulevitch RJ. The clearance, tissue distribution, and cellular localization of intravenously injected lipopolysaccharide in rabbits. J Immunol 1979;123:2133-43. 30. Ruiter D, Van der Meulen J, Brouwer A, Hummel M, Mauw B, Van der Ploeg J, et al. Uptake by liver cells of endotoxin following its intravenous injection. Lab Invest 1981;45:38-45. 31. Jirillo E, Caccavo D, Magrone T, Piccigallo E, Amati L, Lembo A, et al. Review: The role of the liver in the response to LPS: experimental and clinical findings. J Endotoxin Res 2002;8:319-27. 32. Compare D, Coccoli P, Rocco A, Nardone O, De Maria S, Cartenì M, et al. Gut–liver axis: The impact of gut microbiota on non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2012;22:471-6. 33. Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:361S-4S. 34. Vanderhoof JA, Whitney DB, Antonson DL, Hanner TL, Lupo JV, Young RJ. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. J Pediatr 1999;135:564-8. 35. Cesaro C, Tiso A, Del Prete A, Cariello R, Tuccillo C, Cotticelli G, et al. Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2011;43:431-8. 36. Frazier TH, DiBaise JK, McClain CJ. Gut Microbiota, Intestinal Permeability, Obesity-Induced Inflammation, and Liver Injury. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011;35:14S20S. 37. Hakansson A, Molin G. Gut microbiota and inflammation. Nutrients 2011;3:637-82. 38. Racanelli V, Rehermann B. The liver as an immunological organ. Hepatology 2006;43:S54-S62. 39. Su GL. Lipopolysaccharides in liver injury: molecular mechanisms of Kupffer cell activation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2002;283:G256-65. 40. Tobias PS, Soldau K, Gegner JA, Mintz D, Ulevitch RJ. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein-mediated complexation of lipopolysaccharide with soluble CD14. J Biol Chem 1995;270:10482-8. 41. Baldwin Jr AS. The NF-κB and IκB proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol 1996;14:649-83. 42. Madsen K, Cornish A, Soper P, McKaigney C, Jijon H, Yachimec C, et al. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 2001;121:580-91.

Eslamparast et al.

135

43. Resta-Lenert S, Barrett K. Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Gut 2003;52:988-97.

Exposure to bacterial cell wall products triggers an inflammatory phenotype in hepatic stellate cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005;289:G571-8.

44. Ghosh S, Van Heel D, Playford R. Probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: is it all gut flora modulation? Gut 2004;53:620-2.

59. Paik YH, Schwabe RF, Bataller R, Russo MP, Jobin C, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates inflammatory signaling by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 2003;37:1043-55.

45. Li Z, Yang S, Lin H, Huang J, Watkins PA, Moser AB, et al. Probiotics and antibodies to TNF inhibit inflammatory activity and improve nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2003;37:343-50. 46. Haller D, Bode C, Hammes W, Pfeifer A, Schiffrin E, Blum S. Non-pathogenic bacteria elicit a differential cytokine response by intestinal epithelial cell/leucocyte co-cultures. Gut 2000;47:79-87. 47. Grönlund M, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Lehtonen O, Isolauri E. Importance of intestinal colonisation in the maturation of humoral immunity in early infancy: a prospective follow up study of healthy infants aged 0–6 months. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000;83:F186-92. 48. Pagano G, Pacini G, Musso G, Gambino R, Mecca F, Depetris N, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome: further evidence for an etiologic association. Hepatology 2002;35:367-72. 49. Farrell GC. Signalling links in the liver: knitting SOCS with fat and inflammation. J Hepatol 2005;43:193-6. 50. Brun P, Castagliuolo I, Di Leo V, Buda A, Pinzani M, Palù G, et al. Increased intestinal permeability in obese mice: new evidence in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007;292:G518-25. 51. Kim JJ, Sears DD. TLR4 and insulin resistance. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010;2010. pii: 212563. 52. Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, Poggi M, Knauf C, Bastelica D, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007;56:1761-72. 53. Creely SJ, McTernan PG, Kusminski CM, Da Silva N, Khanolkar M, Evans M, et al. Lipopolysaccharide activates an innate immune system response in human adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007;292:E740-7. 54. Peraldi P, Spiegelman B. TNF-α and insulin resistance: summary and future prospects. Mol Cell Biochem 1998;182:169-75. 55. Al-Salami H, Butt G, Fawcett JP, Tucker IG, GolocorbinKon S, Mikov M. Probiotic treatment reduces blood glucose levels and increases systemic absorption of gliclazide in diabetic rats. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2008;33:101-6. 56. Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2005;115:209-18. 57. Seki E, De Minicis S, Österreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-β signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med 2007;13:1324-32. 58. Brun P, Castagliuolo I, Pinzani M, Palù G, Martines D. Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013

60. Ma X, Hua J, Li Z. Probiotics improve high fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance by increasing hepatic NKT cells. J Hepatol 2008;49:821-30. 61. Nardone G, Compare D, Liguori E, Di Mauro V, Rocco A, Barone M, et al. Protective effects of Lactobacillus paracasei F19 in a rat model of oxidative and metabolic hepatic injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010;299:G669-76. 62. Esposito E, Iacono A, Bianco G, Autore G, Cuzzocrea S, Vajro P, et al. Probiotics Reduce the Inflammatory Response Induced by a High-Fat Diet in the Liver of Young Rats. J Nutr 2009;139:905-11. 63. Velayudham A, Dolganiuc A, Ellis M, Petrasek J, Kodys K, Mandrekar P, et al. VSL#3 probiotic treatment attenuates fibrosis without changes in steatohepatitis in a diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis model in mice. Hepatology 2009;49:989-97. 64. Mencarelli A, Distrutti E, Renga B, D’Amore C, Cipriani S, Palladino G, et al. Probiotics Modulate Intestinal Expression of Nuclear Receptor and Provide Counter-Regulatory Signals to Inflammation-Driven Adipose Tissue Activation. PLoS One 2011;6:e22978. 65. Xu R, Wan Y, Fang Q, Lu W, Cai W. Supplementation with probiotics modifies gut flora and attenuates liver fat accumulation in rat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease model. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2012;50:72-7. 66. Wang Y, Xu N, Xi A, Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Bai X. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum MA2 isolated from Tibet kefir on lipid metabolism and intestinal microflora of rats fed on high-cholesterol diet. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;84:341-7. 67. Lee H-Y, Park J-H, Seok S-H, Baek M-W, Kim D-J, Lee K-E, et al. Human originated bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus PL60, produce conjugated linoleic acid and show anti-obesity effects in diet-induced obese mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1761:736-44. 68. Yadav H, Jain S, Sinha PR. Antidiabetic effect of probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei in high fructose fed rats. Nutrition 2007;23:62-8. 69. Million M, Angelakis E, Paul M, Armougom F, Leibovici L, Raoult D. Comparative meta-analysis of the effect of Lactobacillus species on weight gain in humans and animals. Microb Pathog 2012;53:100-8. 70. Loguercio C, Federico A, Tuccillo C, Terracciano F, D’Auria MV, De Simone C, et al. Beneficial Effects of a Probiotic VSL#3 on Parameters of Liver Dysfunction in Chronic Liver Diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:5403.

136


71. Vajro P, Mandato C, Licenziati MR, Franzese A, Vitale DF, Lenta S, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain GG in Pediatric Obesity-related Liver Disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011;52:740-3.

73. Malaguarnera M, Vacante M, Antic T, Giordano M, Chisari G, Acquaviva R, et al. Bifidobacterium longum with Fructo-Oligosaccharides in Patients with Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57:545-53.

72. Aller R, De Luis DA, Izaola O, Conde R, Gonzalez Sagrado M, Primo D, et al. Effect of a probiotic on liver aminotransferases in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011;15:1090-5.

74. Lirussi F, Mastropasqua E, Orando S, Orlando R. Probiotics for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and/or steatohepatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:CD005165.

Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases/ Vol.5/ No.3/ July 2013