Problems Experienced by Pre-School Teachers While

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 (2012) 3936 – 3941

WCES 2012

Problems experienced by pre-school teachers while applying assessment and evaluation methods Ela Furat a *, H.Gonca Usta Sayin b, Muge Ulumanc a Ankara University, Ankara , Turkey Cumhuriyet University, Sivas , Turkey a KastamonuUniversity, Kastamonu, Turkeyc a

Abstract Assessment and evaluation are inseparable and supplementary parts of education. When planning and implementation stages of education are examined, it is seen that assessment and evaluation are seen as important elements completing the process. In education, assessment and evaluation are used to determine the student's development level, readiness and learning difficulties. elopment and to determine learning difficulties. Checklists, observation forms and portfolios are measurement tools frequently used. Since assessment and evaluation in this period are critical, it is quite important that pre-school teachers determine the problems while using assessment and evaluation methods. This research is a qualitative study trying to determine the problems of pre-school teachers in Ankara while using the assessment and evaluation methods.In this study, random sampling is used among probability sampling methods. In the research, data is collected by using half structured interview form prepared by researchers.Data is analyzed by using descriptive analysis method and is summarized according to themes determined by researchers.

12Published Published by Elsevier Ltd. and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu © 2012 by Elsevier Ltd. Selection Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.

Keywords: Presc Pre-school, Assessment, Evaluation

1.

Introduction

Education is a process from birth to death of a person. During this process, various data, skill, attitude and values are taught. These learnings cause considerable changes of a person. (Erden, 1998) According to modern scientific understanding, education is the physical, emotional, mental and social abilities of a person itself and also the process Education process is divided into some stages in order to serve the education to people in a more effective way. First and the most important of all is the one called pre school period. The first years of life, this education process has an important role in development and education of a child. In fact, pre school education is a period, including the er period from birth to primary school, focusing on developments of same

* Corresponding Author name.Ela FURAT Tel.: +90-534-404 56 86 E-mail address: [email protected]

1877-0428 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.175

Ela Furat et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 (2012) 3936 – 3941

3937

In this process, being the peak of curiosity and exploring, one has to be very careful about the education,

Skills, which a child gains during pre school period, are the basis of what these children will gain in the future. Between 0 6 ages, the blanks, which cannot be filled in pre school period, are very difficult to fill later. Thus, pre school education institutes carry importance about preparing the children to primary school. In pre school education institutions, at first children learn to be an individual without their parents. This is the first step to make the children gain maturity both mentally and socially. In pre school education institutions, children are not taught literacy but they are gained literacy maturity and in addition to this some line, concept and numerical studies are performed among the children. Children learn to obey the rules, eat meals, use the toilets, clean, play When considered the effects of the learnings during pre school period upon later life, observation and analysis of the development of this period is quite important. Supporting the development of children in cognitive, affective, psychomotor fields can be controlled by analyzing the child objectively. This can be possible by recognizing and analyzing. Also, getting enough and sufficient feedback about how the education program runs, including necessary corrections, must decisions in education facilities, all have to base on assessment and evaluation.(Erkus, 2006) As a result of education facilities, determining how much the desired aims are gained, the learning difficulties, the efficiency of education programs, method and techniques, the analysis aimed at guiding the students are all valid and base on reliable assessment results. (Kan, 2009) As a part of program, what the teachers working in pre school education are expected are that they should not make the evaluation just for only facility, should realize various facilities as observations during the day, and should fill the observation results in registry forms. In pre school education institutions, development, education and health of every child should be filled in an observation development file, in direction of these, an acquisition evaluation file is held (Pre School Education Institutions Regulations, Clause 55, 56). In pre school institutions, at least a well prepared development report is given to families every term. In development reports, observation results are presented by concrete examples. This report is prepared like a school report; good, medium, bad or joined, not joined. Teacher keeps an acquisition evaluation file for each child and imprints the student file information with development reports prepared according to acquisition evaluation file information to e school system ( Pre School Education Institutions Regulations, Clause 20 ). Teacher makes use of such evaluation methods as development reports, portfolios (development files), standard tests, development control lists, anectode registries, observation registries while identifying and evaluating the pre school children. (URL, 2010.) In pre school period, feedback, gained from assessment and evaluation, is very important to follow the development of students. To use the assessment and evaluation tools in right time and correctly is as important as nature of assessment. In this sense, determining the problems experienced while using assessment and evaluation equipments and methods, watching and evaluating the development of students are all important to guide the Method Pattern of Research This is a qualitative study trying to determine the problems of pre school teachers, working in Ankara, while using assessment and evaluation equipment and methods. In this study, case study pattern is used. Case study is handled by certain sampling on subject and extent; thus, it is focused on that pre assessment and evaluation applications, their problems and solutions (Yin, 1994).

3938


Participants In this study, among the purposeful sampling methods, accessible case sampling is used. For this reason, 15 volunteer teachers, working in Ankara, are the sampling of this research. Collection and Analysis of Data In this research, semi formed interview form is used to collect data. The questions on interview form are prepared by reviewing assessment and evaluation methods used in National Education program, and according to Pre School Education Institutions Regulations. Scholar opinion is taken about increasing the validity and reliability of the study. Among the teachers in the group, interviews are made through recorders. Two researchers encoded the data independently. Then, coding results are compared. It is seen that their coding results are the same. At the final stage, coarse data and analyzed data are controlled by two researchers. ( Analysis of the data is made through depictive analysis method. Data, gained from interview form, is Findings and Comment In this part, answers, which teachers gave in interview form, are presented through research aim. Findings gained from research data are presented as part of themes formed in data analysis. Interview findinds are summarized in Table 1. Table 1.Views and Divisions of Pre

School Teachers about Assessment and Evaluation Applications

Views

Participants

I am using portfolios, control lists and acquisition evaluation form as required. The assessment and evaluation equipment are fit fot purpose; but they have to be corrected and developed. Because the items in evaluation forms are many, I think they have to be reduced to fit for purpose. Acquisitions about daily life in acquisition evalution form have to be many. Language of evaluation forms must be degraded to much easier than the report language. Appropriate rating options are not in forms for every acquisition and this aggravates the evaluation. plans. I think the training of assessment and evaluation is not sufficient for graduate education. We must take applied in service training at certain intervals about assessment and evaluation in pre school education.

Teach

K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12, K13, K14, K15 K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12, K13, K14, K15 K1, K2, K4, K5, K6, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12, K13, K14 K1, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10, K12, K13, K15 K2, K3, K5, K7, K8, K11, K12, K15 K2, K4, K5, K6, K8, K9, K10, K11, K13, K14, K15 K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K10, K11, K13, K14, K15 K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12, K13, K14, K15 K1, K2, K3, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10, K11, K12, K13, K14, K15

f

%

15

100

15

100

12

80

12

80

8

53

11

73

13

87

15

100

14

93

3939


1.

EffectiveUse of Assessment and Evaluation Methods

Table 2: Views

f

%

I am using portfolios, control lists and acquisition evaluation form as required.

15

100

As seen in Table 2, all the teachers interviewed said that they used portfolios, control lists and acquisition forms as required. Assessment and evaluation equipment, proposed in program, are used by teachers in the direction of instructions. 2.

The suitability of Assessment and Evaluation Methods Used assessment and evaluation methods in direvtion of program are given in Table 3 Table 3: The suitability of Assessment and Evaluation Methods Used Views

f

%

The assessment and evaluation equipment are fit fot purpose; but they have to be corrected and developed. Because the items in evaluation forms are many, I think they have to be reduced to fit for purpose.

15 12

100 80

All teachers said the assessment and evaluation equipment were fit fot purpose; but they had to be corrected and developed. K1 and K9 common views are below: I think we are using the best equipment for Pre School education. But I have to say that K1, K9,: these equipment is not enough as we use them. These equipment has to be corrected and developed. 80 percent of teac The items of acquisition evaluation form are so long. A student fills for 3 or 4 paper K2: imformation and my class has 25 students. It takes much time. I suggest that we use daily acquisition in less numbers. It is seen that assessment and evaluation equipment is fit for purpose in programs but there are some difficulties because the contents are so extensive. In addition, the fact that there are many items in contents is an observed factor preventing effective use of these forms in classrooms in which there are many students. That these forms include daily acquisitons is a factor increasing the use of these forms by teachers. 3.

The Contents of Evaluation Forms Used Views of teachers about the content of sample forms given in programs are given in Table 4. Table 4: The Contents of Evaluation Forms Used

Views

f

Acquisitions about daily life in acquisition evalution form have to be many. Language of evaluation forms must be degraded to much easier than the report language. Appropriate rating options are not in forms for every acquisition and this aggravates the evaluation. ns which are in plans.

12 8 11 13

% 80 53 73 87

3940


life and they say that these expressions have to be increased. About this topic, view of K5 is below: I see that there is much acquisition, which takes part in daily life and not in evaluation K5: form. Yet, a pre school student may experience more special situation is below:

53 percent of teachers say that language of evaluation forms must be degraded. About this topic, K12

The evaluation forms we use are written in report language. Clearly, I sometimes have K12: difficulty in understanding what these expressions mean. I prefer that these expressions are written in a more simple language 73 pe rating.About this topic, K8 K8

sufficient for some acquisitions. For example; in cognitive field: there is an for a student there is not an expression. In form, more detailed

87 percent of teachers say that there is not a detailed instruction about the sample form application. About this topic, K4 when to fill the K4 forms and how to fill the forms. We have some information about this subject with more experienced teachers The forms in the program, which teachers have to fill, have to include the situations of some special students. Also, the ratin That the instruction about the application is limited, especially young teachers could make these applications by the help of experienced teachers is observed. Content of the evaluation forms in program is limited and not enough from the point of defined proficiencies, rates and instruction. 4.

Proficiency of Teachers Views of teachers about assessment and evaluation lesson they had at university, and about the in education they had when they were teachers are given in Table 5.

service

Table 5:Proficienct of Teachers Views I think that the education we had at university about the assessment and evaluation is not sufficient. We must take applied in service training at certain intervals about assessment and evaluation in pre education..

school

f

%

15

100

14

93

All of the teachers say that their education during school time about assessment and evaluation is not sufficient. Views of K7 and K15 are below: The assessment and evaluation lessons were absolutely insufficient. I recognized what K7: assessment and evaluation was while I was going to courses after graduation. During our lessons were different and we graduated insufficiently

3941


K15: reason, we were doing different applications. I think that if we had our lectures from our assessment and evaluation lecturers, we would be more conscious now 93 percent of teachers said that during in service seminars, they wanted to take applied assessment and evaluation lessons at certain intervals. Views of K10 are above: Richer assessment and evaluation in service seminars should be made. And these K10: education should be funny and applied in order to make it more effective It is seen that at universities, assessment and evaluation lectures are not aimed at applications. And teachers have difficulty when they start work. Besides this, there is no in service training about assessment and evaluation and the education is only in theory. It is also seen that pre school teachers see themselves insufficient about assessment and evaluation. DISCUSSION AND RESULT The rapid development of a child in early childhool will have a big impact on later life. For this reason, it is very important to observe and evaluate this development. Supporting the development of children in cognitive, affective, psychomotor fields can be controlled by analyzing the child objectively. This can be possible by 72 months education, recognition and recognizing the child. In Ministry of National Education, during 36 evaluation of child; collection of information about the child from various systematic ways, their registry and the child can then be evaluated with this database. But it is seen that pre school teachers only use the assessment and evaluation forms which the program suggests. These forms are difficult for content and to fit for purpose in not suitable for evaluating the students separately and for seeing the real performance of children. They neither have education about the assessment and evaluation nor have they in service training while they are teachers. school teachers use only acquisition evaluation forms and developments reports for velopment. Because these are applied only at the end of term, they lack time and so cannot follow the real developments of children. Thus, it is observed that the necessity of various assessment methods, emphasized in this program, at certain intervals is not in forms and appliance. It is seen that pre

In sum, it is agreed that the assessment and evaluation methods used in pre schools should be made richer. It is the common expectation of teachers that in order to emphasize the importance of assessment and evaluation, there should be some applied training about this subject. REFERENCES , (22), 24,25. Farkl sosyo Yay mlanmam Erden, M. (1998). Erkus, A. (2006).

n okul olgunlu stanbul.

s ndan kar la t r lmas

-47. -karamlar ve uygulamalar. (Gelistirilmis

1997).

M.E.B. , Ankara,

Bilimler URL:

-30. (2010). eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/.../TR_TR.pdf. Er

Sosyal bilimlerde nitel aras Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods. London: SAGE.