Reference values of hematological parameters for ...

3 downloads 6 Views 915KB Size Report
Tripathi NK, Latimer KS and Burnley VV. (2004). Hematologic reference intervals for koi. (Cyprinus carpio), including blood cell morphology, cytochemistry, and.

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 169

ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜›ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱCyprinus carpio M. Witeska*, K. Lugowska and E. Kondera Department of Animal Physiology, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 12, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

Abstract —Š•¢œ’œȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ’œȱœ˜–Ž’–ŽœȱžœŽȱ˜›ȱŠœœŽœœ–Ž—ȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ‘ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ—ȱ™‘¢œ’˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱœŠžœǰȱ‹˜‘ȱ’—ȱŠšžŠŒž•ž›ŽȱŠ—ȱ›ŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ǯȱ ˜ ŽŸŽ›ǰȱŽŽ›–’—Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ ŸŠ•žŽœȱ’—ȱ꜑ȱ’œȱ–žŒ‘ȱ–˜›Žȱ’ĜŒž•ȱ‘Š—ȱ’—ȱ‘’‘Ž›ȱŸŽ›Ž‹›ŠŽœȱžŽȱ˜ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ™˜’”’•˜‘Ž›–¢ȱŠ—ȱ‘’‘ȱ spatial, temporal and individual variability. In the present paper we summarized the data obtained ’—ȱŘŖŖŜȬŘŖŗŚȱ˜›ȱ›˜ž™œȱ˜ȱ›˜–ȱŚŗȱ˜ȱŗŚŜȱǻ˜›ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œǼȱŒ•’—’ŒŠ••¢ȱ‘ŽŠ•‘¢ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ǰȱ śȬŞȱ–˜—‘ȱ˜•ȱ“žŸŽ—’•Žœǰȱ‘Š›ŸŽœŽȱ’—ȱŠžž–—ȱ›˜–ȱ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ™˜—œȱŠ—ȱŠŒŒ•’–ŠŽȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱ ›ŽŒ’›Œž•Š˜›¢ȱœ¢œŽ–ȱ˜›ȱřȬŚȱ ŽŽ”œȱŠȱŗŜȬŗŞǚǯȱ‘ŽȱşśƖȱŒ˜—ꍮ—ŒŽȱ•ŽŸŽ•œȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱœž’Žȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ  Ž›ŽDZȱ ȱŘŚǯŖȬŘśǯśƖǰȱ ‹ȱŜŘǯŚȬŜşǯŜȱȦǰȱȱŗǯřśȬŗǯśŗȱƼȱŗŖ6ȦΐǰȱȱŗŝŞǯŜȬŘŖŖǯŗȱǰȱ ȱŚŝǯřȬśřǯŗȱ ™ǰȱ ȱŘśŜǯŜȬŘŞŚǯşȱȦǰȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱŽ›¢‘›˜‹•ŠœœȱŘǯŗȬŚǯŗƖǰȱȱśŗǯřȬŜŖǯŞȱƼȱŗŖ3Ȧΐǰȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ ˜DZȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢ŽœȱŞŝǯřȬşŗǯŝƖǰȱ—Žž›˜™‘’•œȱśǯŜȬŞǯşƖȱŠ—ȱ–˜—˜Œ¢ŽœȱŖǯŝȬŘǯŖƖǰȱȱŗŚǯŚȬŘśǯŚȱƼȱŗŖ3Ȧΐȱ Š—ȱœ™˜—Š—Ž˜žœȱ˜¡’Š’ŸŽȱ–ŽŠ‹˜•’ŒȱŠŒ’Ÿ’¢ȱ˜ȱ™‘Š˜Œ¢ŽœȱŖǯşŗȬŗǯŗŗȱȦȱ˜ȱ˜›–Š£Š—ǯȱ‘Žȱ›Žœž•œȱ Š•œ˜ȱ›ŽŸŽŠ•Žȱ’쎛Ž—ȱŸŠ›’Š‹’•’¢ȱ˜ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œǰȱœ˜–Žȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–ȱ‹Ž’—ȱœŠ‹•Žȱ ǻŽǯǯȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢ŽœǼǰȱ–˜œȱȮȱ–˜Ž›ŠŽ•¢ȱŸŠ›’Š‹•ŽȱǻŽȱ ‹ǰȱǰȱǰȱ ȱŠ—ȱ Ǽǰȱ  ‘’•Žȱ˜‘Ž›ȱȬȱ‘’‘•¢ȱŸŠ›’Š‹•ŽȱǻŽȱȱŠ—ȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱ™‘Š˜Œ¢ŽœǼǯ

Introduction Hematological analyses including complete ‹•˜˜ȱŒŽ••ȱŒ˜ž—ȱŠ—ȱŽŸŠ•žŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ‹’˜Œ‘Ž–’ŒŠ•ȱ or immunological parameters are sometimes Š™™•’Žȱ˜›ȱŠœœŽœœ–Ž—ȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ‘ŽŠ•‘ȱŠ—ȱ™‘¢œ’-

ŽŽ›œȱ˜›ȱ‘ž–Š—ȱ™˜™ž•Š’˜—œȱ–Š¢ȱ‹ŽȱŽę—ŽȱŠœȱ –ŽŠ—ȱƹȱŗǯşŜȱȱ˜›ȱ—˜›–Š••¢ȱ’œ›’‹žŽȱŠŠȱ or values at 2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile ˜›ȱ—˜—Ȭ—˜›–Š••¢ȱ’œ›’‹žŽȱŠŠǯȱ

˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱœŠžœȱŠ—ȱ–Š¢ȱ‹ŽȱžœŽȱŠœȱ’—’ŒŠ˜›œȱ˜ȱ ’œŽŠœŽœǰȱ—ž›’’˜—Š•ȱŽęŒ’Ž—Œ’Žœȱ˜›ȱœ›ŽœœȱŒŠžœŽȱ ‹¢ȱž—ŠŸ˜›Š‹•ŽȱŽ—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—Š•ȱŒ˜—’’˜—œǯȱ

˜ ŽŸŽ›ǰȱ’—ȱ꜑ŽœȱŽŽ›–’—Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ

—ȱ‘ž–Š—ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜¢ȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱŠ›Žȱ

œ›˜—ȱŽ™Ž—Ž—ŒŽȱ˜ȱ™‘¢œ’˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™›˜ŒŽœœŽœȱ Š—ȱ–ŽŠ‹˜•’Œȱ›ŠŽȱ˜—ȱŽ¡Ž›—Š•ȱŠŒ˜›œȱŠ–˜—ȱ

ŽŽ›–’—ŽȱŠœȱşśƖȱŒ˜—ꍮ—ŒŽȱ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ ™˜™ž•Š’˜—ǰȱ‹¢ȱŽ¡Œ•ž’—ȱ‘Žȱ˜™ȱŠ—ȱ‹˜Ĵ˜–ȱ

ŸŠ•žŽœȱ’œȱ–žŒ‘ȱ–˜›Žȱ’ĜŒž•ȱ‘Š—ȱ’—ȱ‘’‘Ž›ȱ vertebrates due to their poikilothermy and

which water temperature plays probably the

ŘǯśƖȱ˜ȱœŠ–™•Žœȱ˜›ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›ȱǻŽ”Ž•‘Š›’—ȱ et al., 2010). According to Ambayya et al. (2014),

most important role. According to Leard et al. ǻŗşşŞǼǰȱ˜›ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ‘Šȱ˜ȱ—˜ȱŒ˜—œ’Ž›Š‹•¢ȱ

‘Žȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ’—Ž›ŸŠ•ȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–-

vary a single baseline range is appropriate,

* Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]

170, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016

 ‘’•Žȱ˜›ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ‘Šȱœ‘˜ ȱ’œ’—ŒȱœŽŠœ˜—Š•ȱ ̞ŒžŠ’˜—œȱ’ȱ’œȱ—ŽŒŽœœŠ›¢ȱ˜ȱŽŸŽ•˜™ȱœŽŠœ˜—Š•ȱ˜›ȱ–˜—‘•¢ȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ›Š—ŽœǯȱŒŒ˜›’—ȱ˜ȱ žœ”˜ŸŠȱǻŗşşśǰȱŗşşŝǼǰȱ‘ŽȱŒ˜—ŒŽ™ȱ˜ȱȃ—˜›–Š•Ȅȱ Š—ȱȃ—˜ȱ—˜›–Š•Ȅȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ’—ȱ꜑ȱ ’œȱ‘’‘•¢ȱ›Ž•Š’ŸŽȱŠ—ȱ‘Ž›Žȱ’œȱ—˜ȱœ‘Š›™•¢ȱŽę—Žȱ ’쎛Ž—ŒŽȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱ‘Ž–ǯȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š-

‘ŽȱŠ’–ȱ˜ȱ™›ŽœŽ—ȱ™Š™Ž›ȱ Šœȱ˜ȱœž––Š›’£Žȱ˜ž›ȱ own data concerning hematological parameters ’—ȱŒ•’—’ŒŠ••¢ȱ‘ŽŠ•‘¢ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ˜ȱ similar size and age, reared in pond and then acclimated to the laboratory environment, col•ŽŒŽȱ˜ŸŽ›ȱŠȱ™Ž›’˜ȱ˜ȱşȱ¢ŽŠ›œǯ

tological parameters may considerably vary

Materials and methods

Š–˜—ȱ’—’Ÿ’žŠ•œȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱœŠ–Žȱœ™ŽŒ’ŽœȱŠ—ȱ

‘Žȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›ȱŠŠȱ›˜–ȱśȬŞȱ

Š›ŽȱŠěŽŒŽȱ‹¢ȱ‹˜‘ȱ’—›’—œ’ŒȱǻŽȱ ›ž‹ŽŒȱŽȱŠ•ǯǰȱ 2001; Svetina et al., 2002; Bastami et al., 2009)

months old clinically healthy common carp

and environmental (eg Orun and Erdemli, 2002; Morgan et al., 2008; Langer et al., 2013; Gupta et

60.7 g were collected and evaluated. The results ’—Œ•žŽȱŠŠȱ›˜–ȱŚŗȬŗŚŜȱŠ—Š•¢œŽœȱ™Ž›ȱ›˜ž™ȱ ˜ȱ꜑ǰȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ›˜–ȱŘŖŖŜȱ˜ȱŘŖŗŚȱǻ—˜ȱŠ••ȱ™Š-

Š•ǯǰȱŘŖŗřǼȱŠŒ˜›œǯȱŒŒ˜›’—ȱ˜ȱžœ”˜ŸŠȱǻŗşşśǼǰȱ ‘ŽȱŽ›–œDZȱ—˜›–Š•ǰȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ˜›ȱœŠ—Š›ȱ’—ȱ’Œ‘thyohematology should be replaced by wider •’–’œȱ˜ȱ—˜›–Š•’¢ȱȮȱŠȱȃ™‘¢œ’˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ›Š—ŽȄǯȱ ‘Ž›Ž˜›Žǰȱ’—ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱœž’Žœȱ˜—ȱ꜑ȱ‘Žȱ ›Žœž•œȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ˜›ȱŽ¡™Ž›’–Ž—Š•ȱ›˜ž™œȱ–žœȱ

(Cyprinus carpioǼȱ˜ȱ‹˜¢ȱ–Šœœȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱŘŖǯŜȬ

›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ Ž›ŽȱŽŸŠ•žŠŽȱ˜›ȱŠ••ȱ꜑Ǽǯȱ‘Žȱ꜑ȱ  Ž›Žȱ‘Š›ŸŽœŽȱ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ™˜—œȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ Inland Fisheries Institute in Zabieniec or the Š–˜”•¿œ”’ȱ’œ‘ȱŠ›–ȱ’—ȱ Š–’˜—”Šǰȱ˜•Š—ǰȱ Šȱ‘ŽȱŽ—ȱ˜ȱŽ™Ž–‹Ž›ȱ˜›ȱ’—ȱŒ˜‹Ž›ǰȱŠ—ȱ

be always compared with appropriate with-

›Š—œŽ››Žȱ’—ȱ™˜•¢Ž‘¢•Ž—Žȱ‹ŠœȱꕕŽȱ ’‘ȱ

’—Ȭœž¢ȱŒ˜—›˜•œǯȱ‘ŽȱŽœŠ‹•’œ‘–Ž—ȱ˜ȱ›Ž•’Š‹•Žȱ

water and supplied with pure oxygen to the

›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œǰȱŠȱ•ŽŠœȱ˜›ȱœ™ŽŒ’ꮍȱŽŸŽ•˜™–Ž—Š•ȱœŠŽœȱ˜ȱ—Š–Žȱ꜑ȱœ™ŽŒ’Žœȱ›ŽŠ›Žȱ

•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŽ™Š›–Ž—ȱ˜ȱ—’–Š•ȱ‘¢œ’˜•˜¢ǰȱ’Ž•ŒŽȱ—’ŸŽ›œ’¢ȱ˜ȱŠž›Š•ȱŒ’Ž—ŒŽœȱ

Šȱœ™ŽŒ’ꮍȱŽ—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—Š•ȱŒ˜—’’˜—œǰȱŒ˜ž•ȱ

Š—ȱ ž–Š—’’ŽœǯȱŠ–™•Žœȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ›˜–ȱ‘ŽœŽȱ

help to improve study design, and reduce the

groups were subjected to ichthyopathological

—ŽŽȱ˜›ȱžœ’—ȱ•Š›Žȱ—ž–‹Ž›œȱ˜ȱŠ—’–Š•œȱ’—ȱ‹˜‘ȱ

examination including clinical, anatomopatho-

experimental and control groups.

logical, parasitological and bacteriological eval-

Common carp belong to the most popular

žŠ’˜—ȱ’—ȱ‘ŽȱŽ™Š›–Ž—ȱ˜ȱ’œ‘ȱŠ‘˜•˜¢ȱŠ—ȱ ––ž—˜•˜¢ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ —•Š—ȱ’œ‘Ž›’Žœȱ —œ’žŽȱ

ŠšžŠŒž•ž›Žȱ꜑ȱœ™ŽŒ’Žœȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱ ˜›•ȱŠ—ȱ’œȱ

’—ȱŠ‹’Ž—’ŽŒǯȱ‘Žȱ꜑ȱ‘Ž—ȱ Ž›ŽȱŠŒŒ•’–ŠŽȱ

also widely used in pond and laboratory ex™Ž›’–Ž—œǯȱ Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ“žŸŽ—’•Žȱ

˜›ȱřȬŚȱ ŽŽ”œȱ’—ȱŠŽ›ŠŽȱ̘ Ȭ‘›˜ž‘ȱŠ—”œȱ˜ȱ 250 L at water temperature 16-18oC, and were

common carp were evaluated by many authors ǻŠ‹•ŽȱŗǼȱ‹žȱ–˜œȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–ȱ–ŽŠœž›Žȱ˜—•¢ȱœŽ•ŽŒ-

œž‹œŽšžŽ—•¢ȱ‘Š‹’žŠŽȱ˜›ȱŗȱ ŽŽ”ȱ˜ȱŽ¡™Ž›’–Ž—Š•ȱŠšžŠ›’ŠȱǻŗŖȬŗŘȱ꜑ȱ™Ž›ȱŗŖŖȱǼȱ’—ȱ ‘’Œ‘ȱ

Žȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ’—ȱŠȱ•’–’Žȱ—ž–‹Ž›ȱ˜ȱ’—’Ÿ’žŠ•œǯȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ›Ž™˜›Žȱ‘Ž›Žȱ Ž›Žȱ›˜–ȱŒŠ›™ȱ

water was changed daily by siphoning out 75%

used as control groups in their experiments and ’쎛ȱŒ˜—œ’Ž›Š‹•¢ǰȱ™›˜‹Š‹•¢ȱžŽȱ˜ȱŽ—Ž’ŒȱŠ—ȱ Ž—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—Š•ȱŠŒ˜›œǯ

˜ȱŸ˜•ž–ŽȱŠ—ȱ›Ž™•ŠŒ’—ȱ ’‘ȱ›Žœ‘ȱž—Œ‘•˜›’nated tap water. Water quality parameters in ‘ŽȱŠšžŠ›’Šȱ Ž›Žȱ–ŽŠœž›ŽȱŠ’•¢ȱ‹Ž˜›Žȱ ŠŽ›ȱ renewal. The water temperature in aquaria was similar as in the acclimation tank (16-19oC),

34±1 28±0.5 29±3 44.0±6.0 43.6 43.6±0.18 33.6±3.2 31.8±5.5 22-39 29±3 36±6 26±3 22.0±5.3 29.8±2.7 33.1-34.8 34.7±2.5 27.2 13.7-13.8 31.0±0.5 15.6±1.5 41.5±0.6 29.2±2.7 42.2±0.5 30.9±3.5 22.3±1.4 42.8±4.0

Ht [%]

Hb [g/L]

MCV [fL]

1.27±0.05 91±4 2.00±0.28 55±6 78.3±2.1 2.31±0.16 103.7±0.6 1.81±0.2 69.4±16.0 178.2±31.7 0.90-2.02 37.6-87.6 133.7–248.4 1.64±0.14 86.3±7.6 180.3±15.3 1.68±0.26 98.2±15.4 236.2±24.6 1.05±0.03 68.4±9.2 248.1±36.0 1.51±0.01 70.7±15.2 1.58±0.10 50.0±0.0 189.3±4.2 1.56-1.65 56.5-61.2 202.7-216.7 1.51±0.22 88.6±4.6 190.0±40.0 1.40-1.49 52.2-53.4 186.5-198.0 0.33-0.38 46.3-47.2 367.3-413.7 2.60±0.01 84.0±10.0 1.07±0.09 - 130.9±16.3 2.48±0.20 88.8±10.0 1.63±0.13 74.30±7.35 179.5±13.5 1.80±0.02 112.4±.4.1 234.5±2.0 2.94-2.95 83.8-84.6 1.40±0.09 71.8±13.5 217.2±24.2 2.30±0.2 60 ±3 1.18±0.06 1.37±0.19 94±8 317.9±60.9

RBC [103/μL] 40.2±6.5 36.9–57.8 52.9±4.7 58.8±6.9 65.2±10.0 31.8±2.0 36.1±38.7 54.0±17.2 34.9-39.8 125-139 45.8±4.2 62.5±1.6 51.9±8.2 -

WBC [103/μL] 18 15.5 23±2 22 21.0±1.5 17±1 19.5-19.9 16.5-17.9 27.4±0.4 26.2–27.1 22.5 38.6±0.8 18-26 27.0±1.2 21-24 23±1 23±1 16.8–20.1 20±1 19±2 21.2 25±0.2

يœ˜ ȱŠ—ȱŠ‹›˜ œ”ŠǰȱŗşşŖ Yildiz, 1998 Kopp and Hetesa, 2000 ˜™’Úœ”ŠȱŽȱŠ•ǯǰȱŘŖŖŖ Stosik et al., 2001 Svetina et al., 2002 Harikrishnan et al., 2003 Tripathi et al., 2004 Mikula et al., 2008 Sudova et al., 2009 Velisek et al., 2009 Velisek et al., 2010 Ajani and Akpoilih, 2010 Kumar et al., 2010 Ahmad et al., 2011 Al Ghanim, 2011 Enache et al., 2011 Saravanan et al., 2011 Al-Rudainy and Kadhim, 2012 Gul et al., 2012 Pakravan et al., 2012 Velisek et al., 2012 Gholami-Seyedkolaei et al., 2013 Masud and Singh, 2013 Yonar, 2013 Jagruthi et al., 2014 Jahanbakhshi et al., 2014 Kuhlwein et al., 2014

Age/mass Water Author ˜ȱ꜑ȱǽǾ temp. [°C]

58.8±8.0 62±12 37.8±2.9 26.8±2.9 120±3 36.9±7.9 60-80 20-50 57.3 3.2±0.1 40±10 216±33 24.0±5.6 200 150-320 61.2±7.3 290±20 74.0±28.3 138.3±28.7 257±26 8.2±3.7 15.3±4.6 263±13 85.4±15.5 138.3±28.7 1.4±0.1 19.4±14.1 171±28 143.0±10.0 2-3 171-179 35.5-37.2 55-60 295±13 - Fingerlings 191-196 65-66 293-337 16.8-18.5 8.0±0.4 25.4±0.9 40-50 4.2±4.1 50.9±11.0 2.9±0.8 20±2 255±11 20.5±7.8 297.4±55.6 266±7 22.0±0.1 41.0±0.2 - 18.4-18.5 11.5-19.5 241±31 32.7±3.2 67.5±9.1 - 155.1±2.0 26.3±1.4 9.9±0.2 25 222±33 29.7±7.1 61.9±2.4

MCH MCHC [pg] [g/L]

Table 1.ȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱǻ–ŽŠ—ƹǯǯǼȱ˜ȱ‹Šœ’Œȱ‹•˜˜ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱCyprinus carpio (according to various authors).

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 171

172, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016

Thangam et al., 2014 Wang et al., 2014 Yonar et al., 2014 Bojarski et al., 2015 Marin et al., 2015 Saravanan et al., 2015 ‘Š›’£ŠŽ‘ȱŽȱŠ•ǯǰȱŘŖŗś 28-31 17±2 20 14 25.9±0.1 -

ŠŽ›ȱ™ ȱ›Š—Žȱ›˜–ȱŝǯŖȱ˜ȱŝǯŚǯȱ‘Žȱ꜑ȱ Ž›Žȱ ŽȱŠ’•¢ȱǻ’—ȱ‘Žȱ–˜›—’—Ǽȱ••Ž›ȱšžŠȱ•Šœœ’Œȱ ˜›ȱ••Ž›ȱšžŠȱŽ›˜›–ŠȱŽŽȱ˜ȱŚǯśȱ––ȱ›Š—ž•Žȱ ’Š–ŽŽ›ȱŠȱ‘Žȱ›ŠŽȱ˜ȱŗƖȱ˜ȱ‹˜¢ȱ–Šœœǯȱ ‘Žȱ˜›’’—Š˜›ȱ꜑ȱœŽ›ŸŽȱŠœȱŒ˜—›˜•ȱ›˜ž™œȱ’—ȱ various studies, and blood samples yielding ŠŠȱ˜›ȱ‘ŽȱŒž››Ž—ȱœž¢ȱ ŠœȱŠ”Ž—ȱ›˜–ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ ꜑ȱ˜—ŒŽȱŠȱ‘Žȱ‹Ž’——’—ȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŽ¡™Ž›’–Ž—œȱ ǻ™›ŽȬ›ŽŠ–Ž—ȱœŠ–™•ŽœǼǯȱ ȱ ŠœȱœŠ–™•Žȱœ ’•¢ȱ by heart puncture with heparinized needles ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŒ‘’••Žȱ‘Ž™Š›’—’£Žȱ™™Ž—˜›ȱž‹ŽœǼǯȱ The studies were approved by the III Local ‘’Œœȱ˜––’œœ’˜—ȱ’—ȱŠ›œŠ ǯȱ‹˜žȱŗśŖȱΐȱ ˜ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ ŠœȱŠ”Ž—ȱ›˜–ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ꜑ǰȱŠ—ȱœŠ–™•’—ȱ™›˜ŒŽž›Žȱ•ŠœŽȱŠ‹˜žȱřŖȱœǯȱŠ–™•Žœȱ˜ȱ blood were subjected to routine hematological analysis (Svobodova et al., 1991, with own –˜’ęŒŠ’˜—œǼǯȱ Ž–Š˜Œ›’ȱǻ Ǽǰȱ‘Ž–˜•˜‹’—ȱ concentration (Hb), erythrocyte count (RBC), mean cell volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), leukocyte

phagocytes (NBT) were evaluated. Calcula-

0.90-0.98 0.79±0.15 1.49±0.12 1.47±0.20 1.14-1.46 0.76±0.03 0.83±2.35

230.0±37.9 176.6±13.5 236.8-268.8 191.4±11.1 285.8±78.5

hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular

34.1-55.6 114.3±4.4 76.6±7.6 102.5±8.0 56.4-69.0 49.2±2.7 78±22

51.0±7.5 243±29 78.8±10.0 446±44 47.1-49.5 183-200 65.0±3.5 340±20 91±31 -

18.2-20.6 197.3±6.3 36.0±4.4 43.8±6.8 61.2-62.3 30.4±1.3 41.5±5.0

5-6 11.3±0.1 46.3±7.7 80±5 25-45 5.8±0.8 10-15

ǻŘŖȬřŖȱœŽŒǯǼȱ›˜–ȱ•’ŸŽȱ꜑ȱ ’‘˜žȱŠ—Žœ‘Žœ’Šǰȱ

14.0±3.4 34.2±5.7 24±1 30.6-34.6 14.5±0.9 18±9.1

Age/mass Water Author ˜ȱ꜑ȱǽǾ temp. [°C] WBC [103/μL] MCH MCHC [pg] [g/L] MCV [fL] Hb [g/L] RBC [103/μL] Ht [%]

Table 1.ȱ˜—’—žŽǯȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱǻ–ŽŠ—ƹǯǯǼȱ˜ȱ‹Šœ’Œȱ‹•˜˜ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱCyprinus carpio (according to various authors).

Š—ȱ‘Žȱ’œœ˜•ŸŽȱ˜¡¢Ž—ȱ•ŽŸŽ•ȱ ŠœȱŝǯŖȬşǯŚȱȦǯȱ ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱŠ––˜—’ž–ȱ›Š—Žȱ›˜–ȱŖǯřȱ ˜ȱŗǯŖȱ–ȦǰȱŠ—ȱ˜ȱ—’›’Žȱ›˜–ȱŖǯŖȱ˜ȱŖǯřȱ–Ȧǯȱ

count (WBC), thrombocyte count (PLT) and œ™˜—Š—Ž˜žœȱ˜¡’Š’ŸŽȱ–ŽŠ‹˜•’ŒȱŠŒ’Ÿ’¢ȱ˜ȱ ’˜—œȱ˜ȱŽ›¢‘›˜‹•Šœȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ǰȱŠ—ȱ’쎛Ž—’Š•ȱ •Žž”˜Œ¢ŽȱŒ˜ž—œȱǻ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢Žœǰȱ —Žž›˜™‘’•œȱŠ—ȱ–˜—˜Œ¢ŽœǼȱ Ž›Žȱ™Ž›˜›–Žȱ ›˜–ȱ‹•˜˜ȱœ–ŽŠ›œȱœŠ’—Žȱ ’‘ȱŠ¢ȱ ›ž— Š•ȱ and Giemsa solutions (300 erythrocytes and 100 •Žž”˜Œ¢Žœȱ Ž›ŽȱŸ’Ž ŽȱŠ—ȱ’Ž—’ꮍȱ’—ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ œ–ŽŠ›Ǽǯȱ Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢ŽœȱŠ—ȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢Žœȱ Šœȱ™Ž›˜›–ŽȱŠŒŒ˜›’—ȱ˜ȱŽ‘–Š——ȱ et al. (1994). For Ht evaluation heparinized ŒŠ™’••Š›’Žœȱ ’‘ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ Ž›ŽȱŒŽ—›’žŽȱŠȱŗŘǰŖŖŖȱ

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 173

›™–ȱ˜›ȱśȱ–’—ȱŠ—ȱ‘Ž—ȱ‘Žȱ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ erythrocyte layer in entire blood volume was measured using a Ht reader. Hb was measured

žœ’—ȱŠ’œ’ŒŠȱŗŖȱœ˜ Š›ŽȱǻŠ˜ǰȱǼǯȱ˜›ȱ Š••ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ—˜›–Š•’¢ȱ˜ȱ’œ›’‹ž’˜—ȱ Šœȱ

using spectrophotometric cyanmethemoglobin

and descriptive statistics were calculated:

–Ž‘˜DZȱŗŖȱΐȱ˜ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ Šœȱ–’¡Žȱ ’‘ȱŗȱ–ȱ ˜ȱ›Š‹”’—ȱœ˜•ž’˜—ǰȱŽ¡’—Œ’˜—ȱ Šœȱ›ŽŠȱŠȱśŚŖȱ nm wavelength, and hemoglobin concentration

Š›’‘–Ž’Œȱ–ŽŠ—ǰȱœŠ—Š›ȱŽ››˜›ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ–ŽŠ—ǰȱ

 ŠœȱŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱ›˜–ȱ‘ŽȱŽšžŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ›Ž•Š’˜—œ‘’™ȱ

ŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱŠœȱ‘Žȱ›Š’˜ȱ˜ȱœŠ—Š›ȱŽŸ’Š’˜—ȱ

‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱ‘ŽȱŽ¡’—Œ’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—œȱ˜ȱ

to mean (in percent). For the literature data

standard hemoglobin solutions. For RBC and WBC counts blood was diluted 100 times with

the same parameters were calculated (n is the

Hayem’s solution, and the cells were counted in ž›”Ž›ȱ‘Ž–˜Œ¢˜–ŽŽ›ȱž—Ž›ȱƼŚŖŖȱ–Š—’ęŒŠtion. MCV, MCH, and MCHC were calculated

Œ˜ŽĜŒ’Ž—œȱ Ž›ŽȱŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱ˜ȱŽŸŠ•žŠŽȱ›Ž•Š’˜—œ‘’™œȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ

using Ht, RBC and Hb values according to the

‹˜¢ȱ–ŠœœȱǻŠȱ™ǂŖǯŖśǼǯȱ

ŽŸŠ•žŠŽȱžœ’—ȱ‘Š™’›˜Ȭ’•”ȱŽœȱǻŠȱ™ǂŖǯŖśǼȱ

standard deviation, median, minimum and –Š¡’–ž–ǯȱ˜ŽĜŒ’Ž—œȱ˜ȱŸŠ›’Š’˜—ȱ Ž›ŽȱŠ•œ˜ȱ

—ž–‹Ž›ȱ˜ȱ–ŽŠ—ȱŸŠ•žŽœǼǯȱ™ŽŠ›–Š—ȂœȱŒ˜››Ž•Š’˜—ȱ

™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱŠ—ȱ ŠŽ›ȱŽ–™Ž›Šž›ŽȱŠ—ȱ꜑ȱ

˜›–ž•ŠœDZȱƽǻ ƼŗŖǼȦǰȱ ƽ ‹Ȧǰȱ  ƽǻ ‹ƼŗŖŖǼȦ ǯȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢ŽȱŒ˜ž—ȱǻǼȱ  ŠœȱŽœ’–ŠŽȱ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ—ž–‹Ž›ȱ˜ȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢Žœȱ

Results and discussion

per 100 leukocytes in blood smears and WBC

mal distributions and the obtained ranges

values. Spontaneous oxidative metabolic activ-

ǻ–’—Ȭ–Š¡Ǽȱ Ž›Žȱ ’ŽȱŽ—˜’—ȱ‘’‘ȱ꜑Ȭ˜Ȭ

’¢ȱ˜ȱ™‘Š˜Œ¢Žœȱ Šœȱ–ŽŠœž›ŽȱŠŒŒ˜›’—ȱ˜ȱ Siwicki et al. (1985) using the nitrotetrazolium ‹•žŽȱǻǼȱ›ŽžŒ’˜—ȱŽœDZȱśŖȱΐȱ˜ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ Šœȱ –ŽŠœž›Žȱ ’‘ȱŠ—ȱŽšžŠ•ȱŠ–˜ž—ȱ˜ȱŖǯŘƖȱȱ œ˜•ž’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ’—Œž‹ŠŽȱ˜›ȱŗȱ‘˜ž›ȱŠȱŘŞǚȱǻ–’¡Žȱ

꜑ȱŸŠ›’Š‹’•’¢ȱǻŠ‹•Žȱ؊Ǽǯȱ‘Žȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ–ŽŠ—ȱ ŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ›Žȱ‹•˜˜ȱŒŽ••ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱǻ ǰȱǰȱ Hb, MCV and MCH) were slightly lower, while

ŽŸŽ›¢ȱŗśȱ–’—Ǽǰȱ‘Ž—ȱŗȱ–ȱ˜ȱ’–Ž‘¢•˜˜›–Š-

authors (Table 2b), which might have resulted

mide (DMF) was added to kill the cells and the

˜ȱȱ›ŽžŒ’˜—Ǽǯȱ¡’—Œ’˜—ȱ Šœȱ›ŽŠȱŠȱśŚŜȱ

›˜–ȱ‘ŽȱŠŒȱ‘ŠȱŠ••ȱ˜ž›ȱ꜑ȱ Ž›Žȱ‘Š›ŸŽœŽȱ ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ™˜—œȱ’—ȱŠžž–—ȱ ‘Ž—ȱ‘Ž¢ȱŠ•›ŽŠ¢ȱ œŠ›Žȱ˜ȱ›ŽžŒŽȱ‘Ž’›ȱŽŽ’—ȱŠ—ȱ–ŽŠ‹˜•’Œȱ ŠŒ’Ÿ’¢ǯȱŽŠ—ȱŸŠ•žŽȱ˜ȱȱŠ—ȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱ

nm wavelength using the spectrophotometer,

lymphocytes in our own studies were higher,

Š—ȱ˜›–Š£Š—ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—ȱ ŠœȱŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱ

 ‘’•Žȱ‘Žȱ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ™‘Š˜Œ¢Žœȱ Šœȱ•˜ Ž›ȱ

›˜–ȱ‘ŽȱŽšžŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ›Ž•Š’˜—œ‘’™ȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱ‘Žȱ œŠ–™•ŽȱŠ—ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—œȱ˜ȱœŠ—Š›ȱ˜›-

Œ˜–™Š›Žȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ–ŽŠ—ȱŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱ›˜–ȱ˜‘Ž›ȱ studies. However, some authors reported ex-

mazan solutions.

tremely low WBC values (below 103ȦΐǼǯȱ ’‘ȱ

œŠ–™•Žœȱ Ž›Žȱœ‘Š”Ž—ȱ˜›ȱśȱ–’—ȱ˜ȱ’œ›ž™ȱŒŽ••ȱ –Ž–‹›Š—ŽœȱŠ—ȱ•’‹Ž›ŠŽȱ˜›–Š£Š—ȱǻ‘Žȱ™›˜žŒȱ

‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ–˜œȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱœ‘˜ Žȱ—˜—Ȭ—˜›-

MCHC was slightly higher compared to those ŒŠ•Œž•ŠŽȱ›˜–ȱ‘ŽȱŠŠȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ‹¢ȱ˜‘Ž›ȱ

’쎛Ž—ŒŽœȱ’—ȱȱ–’‘ȱ‘ŠŸŽȱ›Žœž•Žȱ›˜–ȱ ˜›ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ‘Žȱ—ž–‹Ž›ȱ˜ȱ›˜ž™œȱ

’쎛Ž—ȱ–Ž‘˜œȱ˜ȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢ŽȱŒ˜ž—’—ǰȱŽǯǯȱ

Œ˜—›’‹ž’—ȱŠŠȱǻ—Ǽȱ Ž›Žȱ’쎛Ž—DZȱ›˜–ȱŚŗȱ ˜›ȱŽ›¢‘›˜‹•Šœȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱŗŚŜȱ˜›ȱǯȱ‘Žȱ

’•žŽ—œȱžœŽȱ‹¢ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱŠž‘˜›œǯȱ—Š•¢œ’œȱ˜ȱ ’—˜›–Š’˜—ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ›—’—ȱ’•žŽ—œȱžœŽȱ˜›ȱȱ

results were subjected to statistical analysis

Œ˜ž—ȱǻśŖȱ™Š™Ž›œǼȱœ‘˜ Žȱ‘ŠȱřŚƖȱ˜ȱŠž‘˜›œȱ

174, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016

’ȱ—˜ȱ–Ž—’˜—ȱ ‘Šȱ”’—ȱ˜ȱœ˜•ž’˜—ȱ‘Ž¢ȱ žœŽǰȱŘŖƖȱŠ™™•’ŽȱŠĴȬ Ž››’Œ”Ȃœȱœ˜•ž’˜—ǰȱŗŚƖȱ

’—ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ¢ŽŠ›ȱ’––Ž’ŠŽ•¢ȱŠŽ›ȱ‘Š›ŸŽœȱ›ŽŸŽŠ•Žȱ —˜ȱ‹ŠŒŽ›’Š•ȱ˜›ȱŸ’›Š•ȱ’—ŽŒ’˜—œǰȱŠ—ȱ—˜ȱ™Š›Šœ’’Œȱ

Prochazka-Skrobak’s,10% Dacie’s, 8% Turk’s,

’—ŽœŠ’˜—ǯȱ•œ˜ȱ’—ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱ™Ž›’˜ȱ˜ȱ

4% Rees-Ecker’s or Shaw’s, Marcano’s, Giemsa

•’Žȱ—˜ȱœ¢–™˜–œȱ˜ȱ’œŽŠœŽœȱ˜›ȱ–˜›Š•’’Žœȱ

or PBS – each used by 2%. One author (2%) used

 Ž›Žȱ˜‹œŽ›ŸŽǯȱŽ›ŒŽ—ŠŽœȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢Žœǰȱ

‘Žȱ’—’›ŽŒȱ–Ž‘˜ȱ˜ȱŒ˜ž—’—ȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢Žœȱ in smear. Two authors (4%) used automated

neutrophils and monocytes reported by other authors were 50.4-95.9%, 0.8- 28.0% and 0.5%

methods, remaining 94% - manual count in

-13.6%, respectively (Table 1).

Burker or Neubauer hemocytometers. Accord’—ȱ˜ȱŠŸŠ›ŽœȬ’ŠœȱŽȱŠ•ǯȱǻŘŖŖŘǼǰȱŠĴȬ Ž››’Œ”Ȃœȱ

™˜—Š—Ž˜žœȱ˜¡’Š’ŸŽȱ–ŽŠ‹˜•’ŒȱŠŒ’Ÿ’¢ȱ˜ȱ

œ˜•ž’˜—ȱ’—œžĜŒ’Ž—•¢ȱœŠ’—Žȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢ŽœȱŠ—ȱ

phagocytes obtained in the present study was

the WBC value obtained using this diluent was œ’—’ęŒŠ—•¢ȱ•˜ Ž›ȱŒ˜–™Š›Žȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜‹-

similar to that reported by Yonar (2013) and Yonar et al. (2014) (1.04±0.10 and 0.98±0.11

tained using indirect methods. Additionally,

Ȧǰȱ›Žœ™ŽŒ’ŸŽ•¢Ǽȱ˜›ȱŒŠ›™ȱ˜ȱœ’–’•Š›ȱœ’£ŽȱŠ—ȱ

the authors pointed out that this solution also

acclimated in a similar way to the laborato-

œŠ’—Žȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢Žœǰȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢Žȱ›Š–Ž—œȱŠ—ȱ

ry conditions in this study. It was, however,

immature erythrocytes. Our own experiences with Turk’s and Shaw’s solutions revealed that all blood cell nuclei stained which made Œ˜ž—’—ȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢ŽœȱŸŽ›¢ȱ’ĜŒž•ȱžŽȱ˜ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ similarity to erythrocyte nuclei and thrombo-

•˜ Ž›ȱŒ˜–™Š›Žȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ›Žœž•œȱ›Ž™˜›Žȱ˜›ȱ “žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒŠ›™ȱ‹¢ȱ˜œ’”ȱǻŗşşŜǼȱǻŗǯŜŘƹŖǯŜŖȱȦǼȱ

Œ¢Žœǯȱ‘Ž›Ž˜›Žǰȱ ŽȱžœŽȱ Š¢Ž–Ȃœȱœ˜•ž’˜—ȱ ǻŒ˜—Š’—’—ȱ—˜ȱ¢ŽǼȱ˜›ȱ‹˜‘ȱȱŠ—ȱȱ

without any laboratory acclimation period. The ’쎛Ž—ŒŽȱ’—’ŒŠŽœȱ‘Šȱž—Ž›ȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱŒ˜—-

counts. Leukocytes were clearly visible as small

ditions this parameter may decrease, probably

›˜ž—ȱŒŽ••œǰȱŽŠœ’•¢ȱ’œ’—ž’œ‘Š‹•Žȱ›˜–ȱ•Š›Žȱ

žŽȱ˜ȱ•˜ ȱ•ŽŸŽ•ȱ˜ȱ™‘Š˜Œ¢ŽȱŒŽ••œȱ’—ȱ™Ž›’™‘Ž›Š•ȱ

erythrocytes and small oblong thrombocytes.

‹•˜˜ǯȱ‘’œȱ–’‘ȱ‘ŠŸŽȱ›Žœž•Žȱ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ•ŠŒ”ȱ

Tavares-Dias et al. (2002) also compared the

˜ȱ™Š‘˜Ž—œȱž—Ž›ȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱŒ˜—’’˜—œȱŠ—ȱ optimum water quality.

Œ˜ŽĜŒ’Ž—œȱ˜ȱŸŠ›’Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱȱŒ˜ž—œȱ˜‹tained by various authors and revealed that

Š—ȱ’ ’Œ”’ȱŽȱŠ•ǯȱǻŗşŞśǼȱǻŗǯŞŖƹŖǯŘŖȱȦǼǯȱ —ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ studies analyses were carried out immediately ŠŽ›ȱ‘Š›ŸŽœ’—ȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ™˜—ǰȱ

‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ›Š—Žȱ›˜–ȱŞǯŖȱ˜ȱśŖƖǯȱ —ȱ˜ž›ȱœž¢ȱ

‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢ŽȱŒ˜ž—œȱ’—ȱ꜑Žœȱ’œȱ›Š›Ž•¢ȱ™Ž›-

this value was 49%, while pooled data obtained

˜›–ŽȱŠ—ȱ‘ŽœŽȱŒŽ••œȱŠ›Žȱ˜Ž—ȱŒ•Šœœ’ꮍȱ˜ȱ

˜›ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒŠ›™ȱ‹¢ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱŠž‘˜›œȱǻŠ‹•Žȱ؋Ǽȱ

one group with leukocytes due to considerable

showed 104%.

morphological similarity. Our data showed that ‘Ž’›ȱ—ž–‹Ž›ȱ’—ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ˜ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ’œȱ‘’‘•¢ȱ

Š‹•ŽȱŠ—ȱ‘’‘ȱ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢Žœȱ

variable. According to other authors mean PLT

(almost exclusively resting cells were observed,

ŸŠ•žŽœȱ’—ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒŠ›™ȱ–Š¢ȱ›Š—Žȱ›˜–ȱŖǯşƼȱŗŖ3Ȧ

ǻ’ž›ŽȱŗŠǼȱŠ—ȱ•˜ ȱ•ŽŸŽ•ȱ˜ȱ—Žž›˜™‘’•œȱǻ’ž›Žȱ

ΐȱ˜ȱŚŝǯŚȱƼȱŗŖ3ȦΐȱǻŠ‹•ŽȱŗǼǯȱŽȱ’Ž—’ꮍȱ‘›ŽŽȱ

1b) and monocytes (Figure 1c) in our study might have been related to very good health

–˜›™‘˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ˜›–œȱ˜ȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢ŽœDZȱ‘Žȱ–˜œȱ Š‹ž—Š—ȱ™¢”—˜’Œȱ˜›–œȱǻ’ž›ŽȱŗǼǰȱ˜‹•˜—ȱ ǻ’ž›ŽȱŗŠǼǰȱŠ—ȱœ™’—•Žȱ˜›–œȱǻ’ž›ŽȱŗŽǼǯ

œŠžœȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ꜑ȱȮȱŸŽŽ›’—Š›¢ȱŽ¡Š–’—Š’˜—ȱ˜—Žȱ

Ht [%] RBC [106ȦΐǾ

‹ȱǽȦǾ ȱǽǾ MCH [pg]  ȱǽȦǾ Erythroblasts [%] WBC [103ȦΐǾ Lymphocytes [%] Neutrophils [%] Monocytes [%] ȱǽȦǾ PLT [103ȦΐǾ

Parameter

140 146 143 119 122 116 41 134 51 51 51 122 50

# of ꜑ 24.8±0.4 1.43±0.04 66.0±1.8 189.4±5.4 50.2±1.5 270.8±7.1 3.1±0.5 56.0±2.4 89.5±1.1 7.2±0.8 1.4±0.3 1.01±0.05 19.9±2.7

Mean ±SEM 4.5 0.47 21.8 59.2 16.1 76.8 3.1 27.7 7.7 6.0 2.4 0.57 19.4

S.D.

2a

25.0 1.31 65.0 178.7 48.0 278.3 1.0 52.3 92.0 6.0 0.8 0.93 13.2

Median 12.0-36.5 0.61-2.80 22.6-170.0 91.4-379.7 13.7-94.0 80.8-547.9 0.0-9.1 11.0-178.8 58.0-98.3 1.0-34.0 0.0-11.0 0.41-2.50 2.9-115.0

’—ȬŠ¡ȱ

Mean ±SEM

34 29.0±1.5 35 1.49±0.10 34 73.8±3.5 24 227.7±13.6 22 59.8±5.9 23 245.7±15.5 34 42.5±7.6 10 80.2±4.3 10 10.4±3.0 8 3.7±1.6 4 14.2±11.1

# of studies 8.7 0.59 20.5 66.6 27.4 74.2 44.4 13.5 9.5 4.4 22.2

S.D.

2b

30.2 1.49 73.0 216.9 52.4 243.0 31.6 82.7 9.7 2.0 4.3

Median

13.7-43.6 0.33-2.95 37.6-114.3 130.9-412.7 31.8-139.0 120.0-446.0 1.4-197.3 50.4-95.9 0.4-28.0 0.5-13.6 0.9-47.4

’—ȬŠ¡ȱ

Table 2.ȱ Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ›˜–ȱśȬŞȱ–˜—‘œȱ˜•ȱCyprinus carpioȱ‘Š›ŸŽœŽȱ›˜–ȱ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ™˜—œȱ’—ȱŽ™ǯȬŒǯȱŠ—ȱŠŒŒ•’–ŠŽȱ˜›ȱřȬŚȱ  ŽŽ”œȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱŒ˜—’’˜—œȱǻ؊ǰȱ•ŽǼǰȱŒ˜–™Š›Žȱ˜ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ›Ž™˜›Žȱ˜›ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱCyprinus carpio by various authors listed in table 1 (2b, right).

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 175

176, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016

Figure 1.ȱŽž”˜Œ¢ŽœȱŠ—ȱ‘›˜–‹˜Œ¢Žœȱ˜ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽœȱǻȱȮȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢ŽǰȱȱȮȱ–˜—˜Œ¢ŽǰȱȱȮȱ neutrophil, T – thrombocyte).

‘Žȱ›Š—Žœȱ˜ȱ–˜œȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ’—ȱ‹˜‘ȱœŽœȱ

—˜ȱœ’—’ęŒŠ—ȱ›Ž•Š’˜—œ‘’™œȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ

˜ȱŠŠȱ˜ŸŽ›•Š™™Žǰȱ‹Ž’—ȱ ’Ž›ȱ’—ȱ‘˜œŽȱ›Ž-

˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱŠ—ȱ꜑ȱ‹˜¢ȱ

ported by other authors (Table 2b), probably

–Šœœȱ˜›ȱ ŠŽ›ȱŽ–™Ž›Šž›ŽǰȱŽ¡ŒŽ™ȱ˜›ȱ ŽŠ”ȱ

›ŽĚŽŒ’—ȱŠȱ ’Ž›ȱ›Š—Žȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ˜›’’—ǰȱœ’£Žǰȱ •’Žȱ‘’œ˜›¢ǰȱŽŽ’—ǰȱ–Š—ŠŽ–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŠŽ›ȱ

negative relationships between MCV and body –Šœœȱǻ›ƽȬŖǯŚŘǼǰȱŠ—ȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱȱŠ—ȱ ŠŽ›ȱ

šžŠ•’¢ǯȱ‘ŽȱŠŠȱ˜ȱŸŠ›’˜žœȱŠž‘˜›œȱœ‘˜ Žȱ

Ž–™Ž›Šž›Žȱǻ›ƽȬŖǯŚřǼǯȱ

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 177

˜›ȱ–˜œȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱŸŠ›’Š’˜—ȱŒ˜ŽęŒ’Ž—ȱ Ž›Žȱ–˜Ž›ŠŽȱȮȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱŘśȱŠ—ȱśŖƖȱǻ˜›ȱ

‘ŠȱŠ›Žȱ›Ž•ŽŸŠ—ȱ˜›ȱ꜑ȱ˜ȱœ’–’•Š›ȱŠŽȱŠ—ȱœ’£Žǰȱ reared under similar environmental conditions

ǰȱ ‹ǰȱǰȱ ǰȱ ȱŠ—ȱǼǰȱ˜›ȱ œ˜–Žȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱǻ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱŽ›¢‘›˜‹•Šœœǰȱ

Š—ȱœŠ–™•Žȱ’—ȱ‘ŽȱœŠ–ŽȱœŽŠœ˜—ǯȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ

neutrophils and monocytes, PLT and NBT)

’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱ™›ŽœŽ—ȱœž¢ȱ˜›ȱśȬŞȱ month old juvenile common carp harvested in

they were high – over 50%, while low variation ǻ‹Ž•˜ ȱŘśƖǼȱ Šœȱ˜‹œŽ›ŸŽȱ˜—•¢ȱ’—ȱŒŠœŽȱ˜ȱ ȱŠ—ȱ

Šžž–—ȱ›˜–ȱ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ™˜—œȱŠ—ȱŠŒŒ•’–ŠŽȱ ˜ȱ‘Žȱ•Š‹˜›Š˜›¢ȱŒ˜—’’˜—œȱ˜›ȱřȬŚȱ ŽŽ”œȱŠȱ

™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢Žœǯȱ’–’•Š›ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ

ŗŜȬŗŞǚȱŒŠ—ȱ‹ŽȱžœŽȱ˜›ȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱŠ—ȱ™•Š——’—ȱ

ŸŠ›’Š’˜—ȱŒ˜ŽĜŒ’Ž—ȱ Ž›Žȱ˜‹Š’—Žȱ˜›ȱ‘ŽȱŠŠȱ

˜ȱŒ•’—’ŒŠ•ȱ˜›ȱŽ¡™Ž›’–Ž—Š•ȱœž’Žœȱ˜ȱœ’–’•Š›ȱ꜑ȱ

˜ȱ˜‘Ž›ȱœž’ŽœDZȱ–˜Ž›ŠŽȱȮȱ‹Ž ŽŽ—ȱŘśȱŠ—ȱśŖƖȱ

under similar conditions.

˜›ȱ ǰȱǰȱ ‹ǰȱǰȱ ȱŠ—ȱ ǰȱ‘’‘ȱ ǻ˜ŸŽ›ȱśŖƖǼȱ˜›ȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ’Žœȱ˜ȱ—Žž›˜™‘’•œȱŠ—ȱ monocytes, WBC and PLT, while low only in the

Acknowledgements

ŒŠœŽȱ˜ȱ™Ž›ŒŽ—ŠŽȱ˜ȱ•¢–™‘˜Œ¢Žœǯȱ˜–™Š›’œ˜—ȱ

™›˜Ÿ’Žȱ‹¢ȱ‘Žȱ’Ž•ŒŽȱ—’ŸŽ›œ’¢ȱ˜ȱŠž›Š•ȱ Œ’Ž—ŒŽœȱŠ—ȱ ž–Š—’’Žœǰȱ™›˜“ŽŒȱ˜ȱřŞŝȦŗŚȦǯ

˜ȱŸŠ›’Š’˜—ȱŒ˜ŽĜŒ’Ž—œȱ’—ȱ‹˜‘ȱœŽœȱ˜ȱŠŠȱ›ŽŸŽŠ•Žȱ‘Šȱœ˜–Žȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ “žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒŠ›™ȱŠ›Žȱšž’ŽȱœŠ‹•Žȱǻ ǰȱ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱ lymphocytes), some moderately variable (RBC, Hb, MCV, MCH and MCHC), and some are ‘’‘•¢ȱŸŠ›’Š‹•Žȱǻ›ŽšžŽ—Œ¢ȱ˜ȱ—Žž›˜™‘’•œȱŠ—ȱ monocytes and PLT). According to Vosyliene ǻŗşşşǼǰȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ›Žȱ‹•˜˜ȱŒŽ••ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ’—ȱ ꜑ȱŠ›Žȱ›Ž•Š’ŸŽ•¢ȱ—˜—ȬœŽ—œ’’ŸŽȱ˜ȱŽ—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—Š•ȱŠŒ˜›œȱžŽȱ˜ȱŒ˜—œ’Ž›Š‹•ŽȱŒ˜–™Ž—œŠ˜›¢ȱ ™˜ Ž›ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ˜›Š—’œ–ǯ The obtained results and their comparison with ˜‘Ž›ȱŠŠȱ˜›ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱœ‘˜ Žȱ ‘Šȱ ’ȱ ’œȱ ŸŽ›¢ȱ ’ĜŒž•ȱ ˜ȱ ŽœŠ‹•’œ‘ȱ Ž—Ž›Š•ȱ ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŸŠ•žŽœǯȱ —Žȱœ‘˜ž•ȱ‹ŽȱŠ Š›Žȱ‘Šȱ›Š—œŽ›ȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ›˜–ȱ natural environment to the laboratory inevitably ’—Ÿ˜•ŸŽœȱœ˜–ŽȱŽ›ŽŽȱ˜ȱœ›ŽœœȱžŽȱ˜ȱ–Š—’™ž•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŒ˜—ę—Ž–Ž—ǰȱŽŸŽ—ȱ’ȱŠ™™›˜™›’ŠŽȱ acclimation takes place and optimum water šžŠ•’¢ȱ’œȱ–Š’—Š’—Žǯȱ‘Ž›Ž˜›Žǰȱ‘ŽȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱ›ŽŠ›Žȱž—Ž›ȱ laboratory conditions and those sampled di›ŽŒ•¢ȱ›˜–ȱ—Šž›Š•ȱŽ—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—ȱ–Š¢ȱ’쎛ǯȱ It is, however, possible to develop the ranges

‘Žȱ™›ŽœŽ—ȱœž¢ȱ Šœȱꗊ—ŒŽȱ›˜–ȱž—œȱ

References Ahmad SM, Shah FA, Bhat FA, Bhat JIA and Balkhi MH (2011). Thermal adaptability and disease association in common carp (Cyprinus carpio communis) acclimated to ’쎛Ž—ȱǻ˜ž›ǼȱŽ–™Ž›Šž›ŽœǯȱJournal of Thermal Biology 36, 492-497. “Š—’ȱ ȱŠ—ȱ”™˜’•’‘ȱȱǻŘŖŗŖǼǯȱ쎌ȱ˜ȱ chronic copper exposure on haematology Š—ȱ‘’œ˜•˜¢ȱ˜ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱǻCyprinus carpio L.). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 14, 39-45. •ȱ ‘Š—’–ȱ ȱǻŘŖŗŗǼǯȱ –™ŠŒȱ˜ȱ—’Œ”Ž•ȱǻ’Ǽȱ˜—ȱ hematological parameters and behavioral changes in Cyprinus carpio (common carp). African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 1386013866. Al-Rudainy AJ and Kadhim MH (2012).

Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŠ—ȱ—Žž›˜˜¡’ŒȱŽěŽŒœȱ˜ȱ Ž—˜œž•Š—ȱ ™Žœ’Œ’Žȱ ˜—ȱ Œ˜––˜—ȱ ŒŠ›™ȱ Cyprinus carpio. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 36, 58-67. Ambayya A, Su AT, Osman NH, Nik-Samsudin NR, Khalid K, Chang KM, Sathar J, Rajasuriar JS and Yegappan S (2014).

ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ’—ȱŠȱ multiethnic population. Plos One 9(3), 1-7.

178, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016 Bastami KD, Moradlou AH, Zaragabadi AM., Mir SVS and Shakiba MM (2009). ŽŠœž›Ž–Ž—ȱ ˜ȱ œ˜–Žȱ ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ Œ‘Š›ŠŒŽ›’œ’Œœȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ ’•ȱŒŠ›™ǯȱComparative Clinical Pathology 18, 321-323. Bojarski B, Ludwikowska A, Kurek A, Pawlak K, Tombarkiewicz B and Lutnicka H (2015). Hematological alterations in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) exposed to herbicides: ™Ž—’–Ž‘Š•’—ȱŠ—ȱŽ‘˜ž–ŽœŠŽȱŽœŽȱ separately and in mixture. FoliaBiologica (Kraków) 63, 167-174. Enache I, Cristea V, Docan A, and Popescu ȱ ǻŘŖŗŗǼǯȱ Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™›˜’•Žȱ ’—ȱ juvenile carp reared under a recirculating system condition. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation International ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ’˜Ěž¡ȱ˜Œ’Ž¢ 4, 644-650. ‘˜•Š–’ȬŽ¢Ž”˜•ŠŽ’ȱ  ǰȱ ’›ŸŠ‘Ž’ȱ ǰȱ Š›Š‘–Š—ȱ ȱŠ—ȱ ˜œŠ›’ȱȱǻŘŖŗřǼǯȱ쎌ȱ ˜Š•¢™‘˜œŠŽȬ‹ŠœŽ‘Ž›‹’Œ’Ž’—ȱCyprinus carpioDZȱœœŽœœ–Ž—ȱ˜ȱŠŒŽ¢•Œ‘˜•’—ŽœŽ›ŠœŽȱ activity, hematological responses and serum biochemical parameters. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 98, 35–141. Gul A, Benli ACK, Ayhan A, Memmi BK, Selvi M, Sepici-Dincel A, Cakirogullari GC and Erkoc F (2012). Sublethal propoxur toxicity to juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L., 1758): biochemical, hematological, ‘’œ˜™Š‘˜•˜’ŒŠ•ǰȱŠ—ȱŽ—˜˜¡’Œ’¢ȱŽěŽŒœǯȱ Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 31, 2085–2092. Gupta K, Sachar A and Raina S (2013). Seasonal ŸŠ›’Š’˜—œȱ’—ȱ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ Golden Mahseer, Tor putitora. International ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱŒ’Ž—’ęŒȱŠ—ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱž‹•’ŒŠ’˜—œ 3, 895-898. Harikrishnan RM, Rani N and Balasundaram C (2003). Hematological and biochemical parameters in common carp, Cyprinus carpioǰȱ ˜••˜ ’—ȱ ‘Ž›‹Š•ȱ ›ŽŠ–Ž—ȱ ˜›ȱ Aeromonas hydrophilaȱ’—ŽŒ’˜—ǯȱAquaculture 221, 41-50. Hrubec TC, Smith SA and Robertson JL (2001). Age-related changes in hematology and

™•Šœ–ŠȱŒ‘Ž–’œ›¢ȱŸŠ•žŽœȱ˜ȱ‘¢‹›’ȱœ›’™Žȱ ‹Šœœȱǻ˜›˜—ŽȱŒ‘›¢œ˜™œȱƼȱ˜›˜—ŽȱœŠ¡Š’•’œǼǯȱ Veterinary Clinical Pathology 30, 8-15. Jagruthi C, Yogeshwari G, Anbazahan SM, Shanthi Mari LS, Arockiaraj J and Š›’Š™™Š—ȱ ȱ ǻŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ 쎌ȱ ˜ȱ ’ŽŠ›¢ȱ astaxanthin against Aeromonas hydrophila ’—ŽŒ’˜—ȱ’—ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ǰȱCyprinus carpio. ’œ‘ȱǭȱ‘Ž••ęœ‘ȱ ––ž—˜•˜¢ 41, 674-680. Jahanbakhshi A, Hedayati A, Harsij M and Barkhordar M (2014). Hematological and ‹’˜Œ‘Ž–’ŒŠ•ȱ›Žœ™˜—œŽœȱ˜ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ Cyprinus carpioȱ˜ȱ’›ŽŒȱ’—žœ’˜—ȱ˜ȱŒ›žŽȱ oil. Comparative Clinical Pathology 23, 799– 803.

˜™™ȱ ȱ Š—ȱ ŽŽœŠȱ ȱ ǻŘŖŖŖǼǯȱ ‘Š—Žœȱ ˜ȱ ‘ŠŽ–˜˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ’—’ŒŽœȱ ˜ȱ “žŸŽ—’•Žȱ ŒŠ›™ȱ (Cyprinus carpioȱ ǯǼȱ ž—Ž›ȱ ’—ĚžŽ—ŒŽȱ ˜ȱ natural population cyanobacterial water blooms. Acta Veterinaria Brno 69, 131-137.

ž‘• Ž’—ȱ ǰȱŽ››’ꎕȱǰȱŠ •’—ȱǰȱ˜Ž¢ȱ ȱŠ—ȱŠŸ’Žœȱ ȱǻŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ쎌œȱ˜ȱ’ŽŠ›¢ȱ b-(1,3)(1,6)-D-glucan supplementation on ›˜ ‘ȱ™Ž›˜›–Š—ŒŽǰȱ’—Žœ’—Š•ȱ–˜›™‘˜•˜¢ȱ Š—ȱ ‘ŠŽ–Š˜Ȭ’––ž—˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™›˜ę•Žȱ ˜ȱ mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 98, 279–289. Kumar V, Makkar HPS, Amselgruber W and Becker K (2010). Physiological, haematological and histopathological responses in common carp (Cyprinus carpioȱǯǼȱꗐŽ›•’—œȱŽȱ ’‘ȱ’쎛Ž—•¢ȱ Ž˜¡’ꮍȱJatropha curcas kernel meal. Food and Chemical Toxicology 48, 2063-2072. Langer S, Sharma J and Kant KR (2013). Seasonal variations in haematological ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ‘’••ȱœ›ŽŠ–ȱ꜑ǰȱGarra gotyla gotylaȱ›˜–ȱ ‘Š““Š›ȱœ›ŽŠ–ȱ˜ȱ Š––žȱ›Ž’˜—ǰȱ India. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences 3, 63-70. Leard AT, Wagner BA, Camp KL, Wise DJ Š—ȱ Š˜ȱ ȱ ǻŗşşŞǼǯȱ ŽŠœ˜—Š•ȱ ŸŠ•žŽœȱ ˜ȱ œŽ•ŽŒŽȱ‹•˜˜ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱŠ›–Ȭ›Š’œŽȱ Œ‘Š——Ž•ȱ ŒŠęœ‘ȱ ǻIctalurus punctatus) in the Mississippi Delta. Journal of Veterinary

Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016, 179 Diagnostic Investigation 10, 344-349. Lehmann J, Hamers R and Sturenberg F-J (1994).

Š–Š˜•˜’ŽȱŽœȱ”Š›™Ž—œȱǻCyprinus carpio ǯǼǯȱŠ—ŽœŠ—œŠ•ȱǯȱ’œŒ‘Ž›Ž’ȱ˜››‘Ž’—Ȭ ŽœŠ•Ž—ǰȱŝŖȱ™™ǯ žœ”˜ŸŠȱ ȱ ǻŗşşśǼǯȱ ŽŒœȱ ˜ȱ ŠœœŽœœ–Ž—ȱ methods on the physiological normal values ˜ȱœŽ•ŽŒŽȱ‹’˜Œ‘Ž–’ŒŠ•ȱ’—’ŒŽœȱ’—ȱ꜑Žœǯȱ Zivocisna Vyroba 40, 301-306. Luskova V (1997). Annual cycles and normal ŸŠ•žŽœȱ ˜ȱ ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ ’—ȱ ’œ‘Žœǯȱ Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemicae Brno 31, 1-70. Marin M, Nicolae C, Dragotoiu D, Urdes L, Raducuta I and Dinita G (2015). Researches ›ŽŠ›’—ȱ‘Žȱ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™›˜ę•Žȱ˜ȱ juvenile Cyprinus carpio varieties. Œ’Ž—’ęŒȱ Papers Series D Animal Science 58, 209-212 Šœžȱ ȱ Š—ȱ ’—‘ȱ ȱ ǻŘŖŗřǼǯȱ ŽŒȱ ˜ȱ Cypermethrin on some hematological ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱŠ—ȱ™›Ž’Œ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ›ŽŒ˜ŸŽ›¢ȱ ’—ȱŠȱ›Žœ‘ ŠŽ›ȱŽ•Ž˜œǰȱCyprinus carpio. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 7, 852-856. Mikula P, Modra H, Nemethova D, Groch ȱ Š—ȱ Ÿ˜‹˜˜ŸŠȱ ȱ ǻŘŖŖŞǼǯȱ 쎌œȱ ˜ȱ subchronic exposure to LASSO MTX ǻ•ŠŒ‘•˜›ȱ ŚŘƖȱ ȦǼȱ ˜—ȱ ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ’—’ŒŽœȱŠ—ȱ‘’œ˜•˜¢ȱ˜ȱ‘ŽȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ǰȱ Cyprinus carpio L. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 81, 475-479. Morgan AL, Thompson KD, Auchinachie ȱŠ—ȱ’Šžȱ ȱǻŘŖŖŞǼǯȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒȱ˜ȱ seasonality on normal haematological and ’——ŠŽȱ’––ž—Žȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ›Š’—‹˜ ȱ›˜žȱ Oncorhynchus mykiss L. ’œ‘ȱ ǭȱ ‘Ž••ęœ‘ȱ Immunology 25, 791- 799. Orun I and Erdemli AU (2002). A study on ‹•˜˜ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱŠ™˜ŽŠȱ›žĴŠ (Heckel, 1843). International Journal of Biological Sciences 2, 508-511. Pakravan S, Hajimoradloo A and Ghorbani ȱ ǻŘŖŗŘǼǯȱ 쎌ȱ ˜ȱ ’ŽŠ›¢ȱ  ’••˜ ȱ ‘Ž›‹ǰȱ Epilobium hirsutum extract on growth

™Ž›˜›–Š—ŒŽǰȱ ‹˜¢ȱ Œ˜–™˜œ’’˜—ǰȱ haematological parameters and Aeromonas hydrophila challenge on common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture Research 43, 861–869. Ž”Ž•‘Š›’—ȱ ǰȱ ŠžœœȱǰȱŽȱ ˜—Žȱǰȱ˜”‘˜ěȱ J, Sodikromo J, Spaans M, Brouwer R, de Lathouder S and Hinzmann R (2010).

ŠŽ–Š˜•˜¢ȱ ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ ˜›ȱ established and novel parameters in healthy adults. Sysmex Journal International 20(1), 1-9. Saravanan M, Karthika S, Malarvizhi A and Ramesh M (2011). Ecotoxicological ’–™ŠŒœȱ˜ȱŒ•˜ę‹›’ŒȱŠŒ’ȱŠ—ȱ’Œ•˜Ž—ŠŒȱ’—ȱ common carp (Cyprinus carpioǼȱꗐŽ›•’—œDZȱ Hematological, biochemical, ionoregulatory and enzymological responses. Journal of Hazardous Materials 195, 188– 194. Saravanan M, Kim J-Y, Kim H-N, Kim S-B, Ko D-H and Hur J-H (2015). Ecotoxicological ’–™ŠŒœȱ˜ȱ’œ˜™›˜‘’˜•Š—Žȱ˜—ȱ›Žœ‘ ŠŽ›ȱ ꜑ȱCyprinus carpioȱꗐŽ›•’—œDZȱŠȱ–ž•’Ȭ biomarker assessment. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry 58, 491–499. ‘Š›’£ŠŽ‘ȱǰȱ ‘Š›Šȱ ȱŠ—ȱ ‘˜‹Š’ȱȱǻŘŖŗśǼǯȱ 쎌œȱ˜ȱŸ’Š–’—œȱȱŠ—ȱ’‹˜ĚŠŸ’—ȱǻŘǼȱŠ—ȱ Œ˜–‹’—Š’˜—œȱ˜ȱ‘Ž–ȱ˜—ȱ‘Žȱ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ǰȱCyprinus carpio ǯǰȱꗐŽ›•’—œǯȱArchive of Polish Fisheries 23, 107-111. Siwicki AK, Studnicka M and Ryka B (1985). ‘Š˜Œ¢’ŒȱŠ‹’•’¢ȱ˜ȱ—Žž›˜™‘’•œȱ’—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ (Cyprinus carpio L.). The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh 37, 123-128. ˜™’Úœ”Šȱǰȱ ›˜Œ‘˜•ŠȱȱŠ—ȱ’Ž£˜Šȱ ȱǻŘŖŖŖǼǯȱ —ĚžŽ—ŒŽȱ˜ȱ ŠŽ›ȱ™˜••žŽȱ ’‘ȱ‘Ž›‹’Œ’Žȱ ˜ž—ž™ȱ˜—ȱ‘Žȱ˜›Š—’œ–ȱ˜ȱ꜑ǯȱMedycyna Weterynaryjna 56, 593-597 [In Polish] ˜œ’”ȱ ȱ ǻŗşşŜǼǯȱ ŽŠ‹˜•’Œȱ ŠŒ’Ÿ’¢ȱ ˜ȱ neutrophilic granulocytes in normal carps (Cyprinus carpio L.). Medycyna Weterynaryjna 52, 529-531. ˜œ’”ȱǰȱŽ™žÙŠȱǰȱ˜”Š›£ȬŽ™žÙŠȱȱŠ—ȱ Wiktorowicz K (2001). Cytometric analysis

180, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 36(4) 2016 ˜ȱ™Ž›’™‘Ž›Š•ȱ‹•˜˜ȱŠ—ȱ˜ȱ˜¡¢Ž—ȱ‹ž›œȱ’—ȱ —Žž›˜™‘’•’Œȱ›Š—ž•˜Œ¢Žœȱ˜ȱ‘ŽŠ•‘¢ȱŒŠ›™œȱ (Cyprinus carpio). Medycyna Weterynaryjna 57, 832-835. Sudova E, Piackova V, Kroupova H, Pijacek ȱŠ—ȱŸ˜‹˜˜ŸŠȱȱǻŘŖŖşǼǯȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒȱ˜ȱ praziquantel applied per os on selected haematological and biochemical indices in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 35, 599–605. ŸŽ’—ŠȱǰȱŠŠœ’—ȱǰȱ˜Š—ȱǰȱžŒŽ–’•˜ȱȱ and Fijan N (2002). Haematology and some ‹•˜˜ȱŒ‘Ž–’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ¢˜ž—ȱŒŠ›™ȱ ’••ȱ‘ŽȱŠŽȱ˜ȱ‘›ŽŽȱ¢ŽŠ›œǯȱActa Veterinaria Hungarica 50, 459-467. Svobodova Z, Pravda D and Palackova J ǻŗşşŗǼǯȱ—’ꮍȱ–Ž‘˜œȱ˜ȱ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ Ž¡Š–’—Š’˜—ȱ ˜ȱ ꜑ǯȱ Ž‘˜œȱ ˜ǯȱ ŘŖǯȱ ŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱ —œ’žŽȱ ˜ȱ ’œ‘ȱ ž•ž›Žȱ Š—ȱ Hydrobiology, Czech Republic. Tavares-Dias M, Mataqueiro MI and Perecin ȱǻŘŖŖŘǼǯȱ˜Š•ȱ•Žž”˜Œ¢ŽȱŒ˜ž—œȱ’—ȱ꜑Žœȱ by direct or indirect methods? Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 28, 155-161. Thangam Y, Jayaprakash S and Perumayee ȱ ǻŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ 쎌ȱ ˜ȱ Œ˜™™Ž›ȱ ˜¡’Œ’¢ȱ ˜—ȱ ‘Ž–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ˜ȱ›Žœ‘ȱ ŠŽ›ȱ ꜑ȱCyprinus carpio (common carp). IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 8, 50-60. Tripathi NK, Latimer KS and Burnley VV ǻŘŖŖŚǼǯȱ Ž–Š˜•˜’Œȱ ›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ ’—Ž›ŸŠ•œȱ ˜›ȱ”˜’ǯ (Cyprinus carpio), including blood cell morphology, cytochemistry, and ultrastructure. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 33, 74-83. Velisek J, Svobodova Z and Machova J (2009). 쎌œȱ˜ȱ‹’Ž—‘›’—ȱ˜—ȱœ˜–ŽȱŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ǰȱ biochemical and histopathological ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ ˜ȱ Œ˜––˜—ȱ ŒŠ›™ȱ ǻCyprinus carpio L.). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 35, 583–590. Velisek J, Sudova E, Machova J and Svobodova ȱǻŘŖŗŖǼǯȱ쎌œȱ˜ȱœž‹ȬŒ‘›˜—’ŒȱŽ¡™˜œž›Žȱ˜ȱ

terbutryn in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 73, 384–390. Velisek J, Stara A, Machova J and Svobodova ȱǻŘŖŗŘǼǯȱ쎌œȱ˜ȱ•˜—ȬŽ›–ȱŽ¡™˜œž›Žȱ˜ȱ simazine in real concentrations on common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 76, 79–86. ˜œ¢•’Ž—ŽȱȱǻŗşşşǼǯȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒȱ˜ȱ‘ŽŠŸ¢ȱ–ŽŠ•ȱ –’¡ž›Žȱ ˜ȱ ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ ˜ȱ ›Š’—‹˜ ȱ ›˜žǯȱ ŽŠŸ¢ȱ –ŽŠ•œȱ ’—ȱ environment. An integrated approach. D.A. Lovejoy (Ed.) 295-298pp.’ Wang X-F, Li X-Q, Leng X-J, Shan L-L, Zhao ȬȱŠ—ȱŠ—ȱȬȱǻŘŖŗŚǼǯȱ쎌œȱ˜ȱ’ŽŠ›¢ȱ Œ˜Ĵ˜—œŽŽȱ –ŽŠ•ȱ •ŽŸŽ•ȱ ˜—ȱ ‘Žȱ ›˜ ‘ǰȱ hematological indices, liver and gonad ‘’œ˜•˜¢ȱ˜ȱ“žŸŽ—’•ŽȱŒ˜––˜—ȱŒŠ›™ȱǻCyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 428–429, 79–87. Wlasow T and Dabrowska H (1990). Hematology ˜ȱŒŠ›™ȱ’—ȱŠŒžŽȱ’—˜¡’ŒŠ’˜—ȱ ’‘ȱŠ––˜—’Šǯȱ Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 37, 419–428. ’•’£ȱ  ȱ ǻŗşşŞǼǯȱ 쎌œȱ ˜ȱ Ž¡™Ž›’–Ž—Š•ȱ ’—ŽŒ’˜—ȱ ’‘ȱœŽž˜–˜—Šœȱ̞˜›ŽœŒŽ—œȱ˜—ȱ ’쎛Ž—ȱ‹•˜˜ȱ™Š›Š–ŽŽ›œȱ’—ȱŒŠ›™ȱǻCyprinus carpio L.). The Israeli Journal of AquacultureBamidgeh 50, 82-85. ˜—Š›ȱȱǻŘŖŗřǼǯȱ˜¡’ŒȱŽěŽŒœȱ˜ȱ–Š•Š‘’˜—ȱ’—ȱ carp, Cyprinus carpio carpio: Protective role ˜ȱ•¢Œ˜™Ž—ŽǯȱEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety 97, 223–229. Yonar SM, Ural MS, Silici S and Yonar ME (2014). Malathion-induced changes in ‘Žȱ‘ŠŽ–Š˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱ™›˜ę•Žǰȱ‘Žȱ’––ž—Žȱ ›Žœ™˜—œŽǰȱŠ—ȱ‘Žȱ˜¡’Š’ŸŽȦŠ—’˜¡’Š—ȱ œŠžœȱ˜ȱCyprinus carpio carpio: Protective ›˜•Žȱ ˜ȱ ™›˜™˜•’œǯȱ Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 102, 202–209.

Suggest Documents